web
counter
 

Uh, Dude. This Week's Episode of "Lost" Was a Question-Answering Episode?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (87)



112237__hurley_l.jpg

“Lost” is not my beat, so I’m not going to try to offer any opinions or theorize (I’ll leave that to Mr. Carlson). But, I read over a lot of the comments to this week’s “Lost” recap, and one of the many themes in the comments was something along the lines of what I was feeling: Why, with only two and a half hours left to go, are Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse still presenting as many questions as they are answers this late in the game?

Well, Lindelof and Cuse answer that question, kind of, in an extensive interview they did with Alan Sepinwall (who is now part of Hitfix). It’s an interesting interview if you’re into that sort of thing, but the one line that stuck out for me most was this:

This is what an episode of “Lost” that is about answering questions looks like.

For folks like me who actually like tidy resolutions that’s a hard statement to swallow. The entire interview basically intimates that, while the characters of “Lost” will get resolutions, the mystery of “Lost” probably will not. Here’s another frustrating nugget:

It’s easy for people to say what they don’t want the show to be, it’s very difficult for them to say what they want the show to be. Carlton and I and the writers and everyone else who’s creatively involved — it’s it’s our job to figure out what the show is and not what the show isn’t. Usually, when we get criticisms, it’s along the lines of, “I really wish you hadn’t done that.” Or “I wish it had been different.” And you throw it back at them and ask, “Well, what did you want it to be?” And they say, “I wanted to see the statue built,” or “I wanted the Man in Black’s first name,” or “I want to know about the guy Sayid shot on the golf course.” Okay, that’s cool, you wanted those answers and we decided not to provide them to you. It’s not because we’re being cutesie, it’s because that that didn’t fit with our vision of the show.

I respect that. Kind of. I guess my one issue is this: If you’re not going to answer those questions, then why did you bring it up in the first place? I think a lot of folks are under the misconception that every frame and every episode and every action of “Lost” matters, and was driving the entire show toward an end point. There’s a lot of superfluous stuff, and I suppose that’s to be expected from a show of this length. But, man: That doesn’t make it any less frustrating. The jist I got from the interview was this: Only the most obvious questions (and maybe not even all of those) will be answered. Everything else will remain a mystery.

I just hope “Lost” fanatics don’t beat themselves up trying to figure out the answers to those unanswered questions, because I’m pretty sure that 80 percent of them are unanswerable.

Here’s something that will take your mind off it, though. Every single one of Hurley’s “Dudes,” edited together into one dudetastic video.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Film News: Pac Man and Frogger Will Destroy New York City | Of Course, Adam Sandler Is Involved | If Russia Got Cooler, It Would Be Fictional | Devil's Flower Trailer









Comments

You're a brave man starting another Lost thread.

I'm fine with the unanswered questions. Striking the balance is very
challenging and you don't want to disembowel your own franchaise
[cough Matrix cough]. I've been quite obnoxious over on Daniel's
superfantastic recaps about how some viewers can't see the forest for the
trees and how it is a sign of good writing that when things are revealed they
make sense instead of being a total surprise; something which for years
seemed mysterious and baffling now makes absolute sense. I think the
production team is choosing their battles wisely. I would also suspect there
will be a Lost companion published to answer more questions. Dudes have
got to eat.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 13, 2010 9:45 AM

Seriously though, all art forms rely on your own creative interpretation to have any significance. Would you really want Every Single Little Question spelled out for you and tied up in a bow? If they address all of the major mysteries on the show, whats wrong with coming up with your own conclusions for the rest? I think part of the fun in this show is theorizing your own answers from the pieces they give you. If everything got addressed, not only would it be incredibly long and dull, but it just wouldnt be the same show.

Posted by: valerie at May 13, 2010 9:45 AM

WORD, and while I love me some Hurley, I also love me some Sawyer, so there's this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_YHV5fdUiQ

Now if someone will just make me a Desmond vid! What, what's that internet? Awww, you think of EVERYTHING: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq_SURMi1Mo&feature=related

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 9:46 AM

Thank you! This interview really pissed me off. JJ & Co have spun this beautiful, mysterious story and now they’re abandoning the reason I was interested in the show in the first place. While character fans get a resolution, I get a magical white light. Fuck you Lindelof and Cuse! Fuck you to hell.

Posted by: Scully at May 13, 2010 9:47 AM

Aiiii, I understand the frustration, because lord knows the goldy light and the "science" (WTFUCKERY? I'm going to use this non-frozen donkey wheel to channel the water and the light and WHAT?!?!?) left me going SCHWA?!?! But, I mean, what if they DO pull it off?! I'm holding out hope. . .brutha.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 9:49 AM

Oh man. My wife is gonna be PISSED!!! She's already been disappointed by BSG, and she swore she wouldn't get sucked in by another show flaunting religious overtones since they allow for nonsensical leaps of logic in the place of intelligent storytelling. May 23rd is D-Day (copywright D-Day) for Kballs.

"Okay, that’s cool, you wanted those answers and we decided not to provide them to you. It’s not because we’re being cutesie, it’s because that that didn’t fit with our vision of the show."

GO FUCK YOURSELVES YOU PRETENTIOUS FUCKS!!!!!! You decide to open a series of Pandora's Boxes, only now you're too chicken shit or not creative enough to provide answers? Total bitch move. If those primadonnas leave most of the mysteries hanging in the wind, it will negatively affect the viewership of any similar show that pops up for the next decade, if not longer. I certainly won't go in for a mystery-riddled series anytime soon. The backlash will be large scale and absolute. That is a childish explanation for a grown-up problem of their own making. I am EXTREMELY disappointed to find this out now. I'll watch the final 3 1/2 hours, but consider my excitement dampened.

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 9:51 AM

Wait, really you guys? Haven't you ENJOYED this series? And talking about it every week? Never has a TV series provoked so much debate around my circle of friends. Lost has been a fun mind stretcher. I've relished trying to stay one step ahead of the twists and constantly being thrown for a loop. I mean, I'm sorry, I LOVE it because most shows out there are dumb and formulaic and predictable and who are YOU that the writers owe you anything? They've produced something (totally in)consistently entertaining and intriguing and controversial for the past six years and I, for one, am pleased as punch that something so unusual has been allowed to carry on to its possibly vague but still engaging conclusion.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 9:58 AM

@Scully

It's more than the white light though. Of all the MacGuffins in the show
that could turn out to be the MacGuffiniest. It's not about the light or the
statue or the Dharma initiative. It's about what we do with what those items
represent and how we respond to them. Fate, destiny and the enmeshing
of free will within them is the focus of the show and has been consistently
returned to thematically. I like the mythology stuff, but it could have been
angels dancing on the head of a pin and would not change the required
response. How do we become who we were meant to be? How do we free
ourselves from our own painful pasts? The themes of the show are the same
as in every mythology and religion (or non-rejected mythology more
accurately) and it always comes down to the ineffable being unknowable and
how humans respond to their circumstances and .

Lindelof and Cuse created an entire universe replete with its own logic and mythology. That is quite an accomplishment. Now you'll just have to wait for
their version of The Simarillion.

BTW, Mr. Julien and I dream of owning an old english sheepdog
called MacGuffin.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 13, 2010 10:02 AM

Didn't fit with their vision???
Is that a nice way to say they were too damn lazy to figure out the answers to their own mysteries?

See, that's what it is: laziness. They had plenty of time to answer the questions, any and all of them. Just didn't feel like it, I guess. If you're gonna bust out a damn polar bear mysteriously living in the tropics, you better explain that shit. And I don't mean finding rusty cages and fish cookie machines two seasons later, mothereffers. I mean, EXPLAIN THAT SHIT. I should have known right then when it showed up that that's how the show would end - half-assed buffoonery masquerading as "mystery".

Pure laziness. And I fell for it. Figured that since they set their end date so far in advance they'd tie it all up so we'd be satisfied in the end. Some folks are satisfied already (and I don't know how they're doing it), but I am not. They set up an awesome premise, and the thing is, it really seemed to be going somewhere. Many somewheres, as it turns out. But now I think it's going nowhere, and it's a shame, because the show was fun and interesting and now...not so fun. Now it just feels like filler and shenanigans. Lazy-assed shenanigans.

Posted by: Chickaboom at May 13, 2010 10:09 AM

The entire interview basically intimates that, while the characters of “Lost” will get resolutions, the mystery of “Lost” probably will not.

Yeah, this is fine by me. Well, at the moment and not having seen the finale yet, obv. I am mostly hoping for the characters to all get some sort of proper ending, the rest of it...eh, answers would be nice, but not having them isn't going to kill me, and it will probably make viewing Lost in the future still interesting, rather than all wrapped up nicely.

Posted by: Carrie (Teabelly) at May 13, 2010 10:12 AM

Who gives a shit about the dude Sayid blasted on the golf course? Someone SERIOUSLY wants that answered? That's getting down to some real nit-picky shit right there.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at May 13, 2010 10:14 AM

That whole show is shyte...seriously who cares. Nuke em!

Posted by: JaneSpotting at May 13, 2010 10:29 AM

They tried to nuke 'em. We still don't know if it worked. That's one of
the questions.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 13, 2010 10:31 AM

And dude, I love Hurley. They best give him a nice ending!!

Posted by: Carrie (Teabelly) at May 13, 2010 10:34 AM

See, I just actually responded to this idea over in the recap thread. It's not that we want every little question ever brought up answered, it's that we want the stuff answered that was made a big deal of.

Copied and pasted for your pleasure (or disapproval, take your pick):

At this point I think I'd have been ok with them just saying 'Look, it's a magical island, weird shit happens, deal with it,' than trying to explain to me the why of it all.
Posted by: Carrie (Teabelly) at May 13, 2010 5:18 AM

I'd have been totally okay with that too. If they hadn't made such a big effing deal about all the weird stuff that happens from the beginning.

See, I was thinking about this last night. I was thinking about the numbers thing. You (that's the Royal You, not a specific you) remember the numbers, right? Those mysterious numbers that won Hurley the lottery, that he got from crazy Leonard, that were stamped on the inside of the hatch, that were used to reset the timer and stem the flow of electromagnetic energy that would destroy the world, that showed up everywhere from ticket numbers to flight numbers to numbers stenciled on garbage cans (I might be making that last one up to make a point)? The numbers were made into a big deal by the show, by Lindelof and Cuse and co., and the audience clamored for an answer to the mystery of the numbers. Why are they everywhere? It can't just be coincidence, can it? It's not like it's a digit or two, it's a specific sequence of six numbers. So, we got an episode detailing Hurley's search for the meaning of the numbers, and it turns out, they're pretty much meaningless. They're not significant.

I think this sums up the entire show pretty well, which is to say that if all the mysteries are meaningless, then what's the point? Why focus SO HARD on those things, the things that are part of the mystery, if what you want to focus on is the character stories? The problem is, you can't create the mystery aspects and then just say, "Well, it's not about the mystery, it's about the characters." Because it IS about the mystery, too. It has been since the first episode. It's kept me on the edge of my seat for nearly 6 seasons. All these little coincidences are introduced, things that seem too linked to possibly be coincidence, and then they just... disappear, chalked off to coincidence. But then they come back again, "Well, was it REALLY coincidence?" I think my being okay with the alternate timeline stuff stems from this: if none of the rest of it, the numbers, the bird, the myriad other details that have made up half the show, if it's really going to be just about the characters in the end, then why shouldn't it end that way? Why shouldn't it wipe out all of the backstories and all those little details that we've learned over the years? Because if they don't matter anyway, then why shouldn't the characters go on to have better lives, and happy endings all wrapped up in a neat little bow made of puppies and rainbows?

You can't have it both ways, is all I'm saying. You can't make it 50/50 character/mystery and then turn around and say, no, it was really 80/20 all along. Because no it wasn't. I was there. I watched it being 50/50. I mean, you *can*, but you HAVE to expect that a good chunk of your audience is not going to be satisfied by that. I really don't think I'm wrong for being a bit disappointed.

Posted by: Anna von Beaversmack at May 13, 2010 10:35 AM

They tried to nuke 'em. We still don't know if it worked. That's one of
the questions.

Hee!

Posted by: Carrie (Teabelly) at May 13, 2010 10:35 AM

Listen, when it comes to the little stuff, like the questions Darlton bring up in that snippet up there, I am totally in agreement. They can't possibly answer every little question or bit of information they roused over the years. That's not what people are so upset about, I don't believe.

I have said all along, the main story here has to be pretty simple. It was planned from the beginning, and the show wasn't even expected to be a hit - so it's something that might have been resolved in season or two. But as the show went on, more and more mythology was added and we were taken on a journey with all sorts of cool connections and side trips. But the cool connections and the side trips were just that - to essentially drag out the main story until whatever end point was decided.
What the problem is going to be (and if Across the Sea is any indication...) is if the main story is not satisfying and we don't get answers to the truly important/main story. Magic light is a little rough. I really don't think anyone is terribly impressed with the magic light. And when all the teasers promise answers, I think we'd all have given up knowing for sure who Adam and Eve were for say, something more about Mother Dearest and how she came to her position of knowledge on the island. At this stage of the game, to give us yet another character who says the same old thing that Ben, Richard and Jacob have already said (the island is special, we must protect it, don't ask questions, talk in riddles), and to spend that whole episode just to show us that Mother was a bitch and MIB has good reason to be who/what he is. All that could have been done in fifteen minutes in a flashback or something.
So the magic light ate MIB and spit him out as Smokey - that's just dandy. There's no logical reason why he sounds like a roller coaster, I can deal with that. But is it satisfying? No. And it doesn't give us much hope for any main storyline answers in the next few hours.

I think what we're going to end up with is resolution for some of the characters who are left (Jack Hurley, Sawyer, Kate). I think some of the resolution is going to be in the sideways. I think we will never be told exactly what the island is, which is wholly unsatisfying. (And I think even if the producers and writers have an idea of what the island is, it would be disappointing.)

Do I love the characters of Lost? Yes. And I have loved this show throughout, even that crappy season. But I certainly expected my devotion to lead to a respectable, believable (with a little stretch) and not entirely silly ending. YOU HAVE TO GIVE US SOME KIND OF INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THIS ISLAND IS! As much as I want to know about what happens to the characters, you can't creae this wacky, magical place and then just ignore the island in the middle of the room when you wrap up the story.

This feels like when I am reading a wonderful book, with a great beginning and middle, and then as the story winds down it becomes more and more muddled and disappointing, and then the end goes off into something completely unbelievable. Then I get mad and throw the book in the garbage. For Darlton to not see that coming seems incomprehensible. People aren't upset that you won't tell us MIB's name. People are upset because they see the unsatisfying end heading their way.

Posted by: Cindy at May 13, 2010 10:43 AM

Well, and I'm going to stretch here and say that what's enjoyable about Lost is how bewildered both we and the OG Losties are. The show has been the perfect vehicle for us as viewers to follow some ordinary (some extraordinary, some douchey, some Brazilian) people as the try to figure out WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON AROUND THEM. And yeah, you know what, sometimes we (royal we, "one" if you will) focus on the WRONG thing, an insignificant thing unable to (ugly island pun alert) see the forest for the trees. If the island is a metaphor for life, where the big issues are faith and logic and just trying to figure out how to survive and how to get along and WHERE DO I COME FROM, then how utterly fitting that it's rife with MacGuffins and Red Herrings.

Personally, I think plunging us into this bizarre world, in medias res and encouraging us to hitch our wagons to whichever Lostie we think has the traits to make it through the hurdles and the crazy Frenchie laid traps is brilliant story telling. Mirrors and parallels have always been a rather heavy-handed motif of Lost and so I don't think it's preposterous to see the Island as a microcosm for the human condition at large, especially with the Flash Forward/Back/Sideways plot device.

This may not be coherent at all, and, essentially I'm repeating myself when all I want to say is, I really really like Lost and I'm going to miss it when it's gone.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 10:45 AM

I just want answers to the big questions and a feeling that a story was begun and ended. I don't care about the polar bear, or the guy Sayid killed on the golf course, or where the dog went, or any of that little shit. I don't mind if those little island mysteries are left open. Answer the big stuff (see below).

This is where I disagree with some people about the writers "owing" explanations. Well, they kinda do, and not just to the fans. When you're talking about movies or books, there is a limited amount of time invested as compared to YEARS of investment in a TV show. Should they explain every single thing? Of course not, that's absurd. But if they don't wrap some shit up, they do a disservice not only to the fans, but to the amazing story they've told. If they go "Dark Tower" (or some other equally ridiculous ending) on this, it will rank #1 on my list of Promising And Entertaining Things That Were Ruined By An Unfathomably Stupid Ending (copywright: Battlestar Galactica).

Incomplete list of what should probably be answered in some way:

1. Time Travel/Alternate Timeline: Seriously, they can't leave this hanging. It is far and away the most important thing that needs explaining. I'll deal with the rest. Just explain how this is possible in Lost world or you fail. And wrap up the divergent timelines. Only one reality can exist since leaving both is a bitch move 100 times over.

2. What is the Smoke Monster?: Like, what the fuck is that thing? How is it possible that it exists? When you introduce completely foreign entities, you need a better explanation than, "he is the embodiment of 'worse than death' or 'he's the MIB, duh.'"

3. Some character resolution. Already been promised.

4. How was Jacob able to leave the island and what is keeping MIB from doing so? And what is the true issue behind letting him loose? The last episode muddied these questions more than ever.

I'm sure I'm forgetting something, but for me, these issues have either not been addressed at all or need to be fleshed out a lot more. I'm sure Lindelof and Cuse don't give a rat's ass about myself and the rest of the viewers, so I hope they feel a responsibility to their creative natures to end the story with conviction and purpose.

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 10:48 AM

to spend that whole episode just to show us that Mother was a bitch and MIB has good reason to be who/what he is. All that could have been done in fifteen minutes in a flashback or something.

That's so interesting because while I give no fuck for gold lights or magic spells, I did take away from this episode a compelling portrait of the psychology of sibling rivalry and, more importantly, the undermining (which yes, we all saw coming) of our perceptions of what is good and what is evil, what is black and what is white.

Jacob's "God" is Mother, yes? And the MIB tries to expose this "God" for what it truly is, illogical and batshit insane. And Jacob resents the sh*t out of this and basically closes his ears and rages out. And Jacob, who all this time, was a beatific presence shows himself, in this flashback, to be insecure and petulant. I find the character journey there SO interesting. Especially in the way it mirrors Jack's journey from Dr. Douchebag to genuine leader. But is their belief system a sham or, even worse, a justification for the perpetration of violence and genocide?

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 10:52 AM

I didn't think Mother was God - I thought the light was (representative of) God. And people doing everything, including murdering, in the name of God does parallel our world. Mother was just one of those rabid followers.

Posted by: Cindy at May 13, 2010 10:55 AM

OK so I really AM fine with most questions not being answered--because I'm not an idiot and I understand that it's all part of the mystery. I don't care about Vincent or who Sayid killed or the stupid little things. But it's not just that they bring up these mysteries and never mention them again--it's that they DRAG THEM ON FOR SIX SEASONS. And you expect us not to be curious about the fucking numbers that kept showing up everywhere, or about Walt who was a major character for who knows how many seasons, or about the Dharma initiative?

Fuck you, dude. This doesn't smell of keeping the mythology and the mystery interesting, it smacks of pure goddamn laziness. You could've done away with all the mysterious shit or just given us some goddamn answers instead of filling in episodes with shit we've already seen.

THIS JUST SMACKS OF LAZINESS AND BAD WRITING.

Don't come at me with this shit just because you dug yourself in too deep and you can't find your way out, so you'll just sit there and tell me that that was your plan all along. NO.

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 10:58 AM

And just...really, using the 'it's all part of the mystery of life' is as bullshit as that 'I did it because I LOVE YOU' line the other night. It's nothing but a cop-out.

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 11:00 AM

Let me expand on some of the criticisms I made in the episode recap thread yesterday.

I am fine with leaving some things open-ended. I don't need every answer spoon fed to me as a viewer and I don't need a tidy little bow placed on each and every geeked-out question posed on Lostipedia. I am even fine with the fact that some mysteries will never fully be resolved. Hey, if they implied that Walt was special in Season Two and then decided to go in another direction, that's cool.

The problem with LOST is that they are starting to do a really poor job with the things that they are focusing on. This episode wasn't bad because we didn't find out MIB's real name or who built the statue, this episode was bad because the entire focus was on the characters that have been revealed to be the foundation on which everything else was built and it was a sloppy mess of unmotivated and inexplicable actions. It did give us answers to very big questions (how did Jacob and MIB come to be on the island) but it was still unsatisfying because of poor writing, poor character development, poor plotting, poor dialogue... just an all around lack of quality.

What makes a show like Lost work is that you get sucked in and invested in the characters and the drama of the situations they are in. The whole thing relies on your ability to identify with the characters personality, understand their motivations, and accept their actions. I can accept without question that there is a supernatural island with ghostly voices patrolled by a magical smoke monster as long as the characters we are following are responding to these events in a way that makes sense.

When the characters turn into caricatures or, worse yet, when they simply become pawns and slaves to the plot that's when you lose me as a viewer. When I lose the suspension of disbelief and see the strings attached to each character's actions leading back to the hand of the writers orchestrating it all from behind the scenes the spell is broken.

Early season of Lost were great because the drama felt natural, it arose from the personalities and the situations. Of course the writers were taking us for a ride all along but you could ignore that and get lost in the mystery. What's in the hatch? What's with the numbers? What is that smoke monster? Who are the Others? It was a hell of a lot of fun to ask those questions and consider the possibilities. Occasionally I would be baffled as to why certain characters did what they did (especially Locke, Jack, Ben, and Widmore) but I could accept that fact that there could be reasons for these actions that were not clear to us yet (they know more than we do, or they are being manipulated by someone else that knows more than we do).

Which brings us to Season 6, where it all falls apart. The characters are no longer acting in any kind of a consistent or logical way. They exist purely to advance the plot (Hurley blew up a fucking boat a few weeks ago. Hurley!) And there are too many of them to follow so the show has basically ignored the ones who are not in focus (I used the deactivated video game characters who aren't on your team analogy a few weeks ago, it is very apt. WTF is Ben doing? Or Richard? Or anyone?) Characters who used to be mysterious and who were assumed to possess knowledge of the nature of the island have sort of shrugged their shoulders in Season 6 and gone blank. (Again- WTF, Ben? You always have a plan, you have been abducting people and running experiments and living on the island and leading "your people" for a lifetime and now you just sit there blankly and have nothing to say and nothing to do? You kill Jacob and that's it?)

You see, it just doesn't work. It undermines everything that has come before. The prior seasons worked because we believed that there was a reason for Ben and the Others and Charles Widmore to do the things they did. In fact, we had so much faith in their motivations that we assumed they not only knew what they were doing, but they knew the Big Picture and were taking steps to achieve larger goals. We made these assumptions because they frequently did crazy shit and took huge leaps of logic so the only way to reconcile that was to assume they had a grander vision as to where things were headed.

But no, here we are and it is revealed that none of the characters seem to know what is going on after all. And last episode we see that even Jacob, MIB, and the "mother" are acting irrationally and without motivation. It just doesn't make sense. They may give us a resolution, but they have failed to give us a reason or a compelling character-driven story. The problem with Lost isn't the answers of lack of answers, it's the lack of motivation and explanation.

The most important question that they are failing to answer is "Why?"

Posted by: Yossarian at May 13, 2010 11:01 AM

You're full of wisdom, Yoss. I agree with every single thing you said up there.

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 11:06 AM

*reads figgy's and Yossarian's comments*

*nods vehemently*

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 11:06 AM

That's the cool thing, Cindy, I think so MANY things on the island can be "God." The light, Jacob, Mother, Smokey even. It depends on the follower. Jacob behaved to Mother the way an acolyte would to a deity. The MIB felt that same adulation for the light. There have been so many conversations/monologues the past few seasons, when the Losties and Others (I'm thinking chiefly of Ben, Richard and Jack) have raged against Jacob and his ineffable plan. In any of these cases you could replace the word Jacob with God and it would sound very familiar to all of us. I mean, after all, in a Judeo-Christian society, isn't our faith/our relationship with God the ultimate Daddy Issue?

Jacob, in my opinion, just happens to have a Mommy Issue.

But then, OK, you RAGE against God because his "plan" seems illogical and CRUEL, but, in Judeo-Christian belief, at least, is counseled to have "faith." Are Darlton showing us that blind faith could be tantamount to trusting the plan of a Jacob. That is not the Man I want in charge. Not at all. *

*Full disclosure, I'm an athiest so I'm not pushing and religious agenda here. Not even Dawkinsism/Hitchensity.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 11:07 AM

Excellent points, Yossarian.

The characters are the story, yet most of them have drifted into nothingness. Sun, Sayid, Locke...each of them extremely strong personalities and characters that faded out until they were practically zombies. Jack has been so destroyed that he has nothing left of himself to question anything - he's just going to follow blindly. And I think that's what we're expected to do as well. Follow while we wrap it all up in a tidy little sideways world.

If the island is sunken and we get nothing more than happy sideways zombie people...

Posted by: Cindy at May 13, 2010 11:10 AM

I think covered is saying that Mother is Jacob's god. Not that she's God, or whatever.

I have lots of questions, I do. Most of them will never be answered, I've accepted that. But they seriously are never going to give us MIB's name? Why have they gone out of their way all season to never tell us if they're never going to tell us, you know? Honestly, that is nothing less than fucked up.

I agree with kballs up there on what they really do need to answer if they don't want to piss off millions of fans. I'm satisfied with the explanation Jacob gave to Richard on what the island is, I think it's possible that no one really knows what it is, but maybe they only know what it does (act as a stopper for evil). I like that the writers trust us enough to let us figure out a lot of the mysteries on our own. That's what makes these discussions so fun. And, Jesus, look at what happens when they DO give us straightforward answers (the whispers, the numbers - which they did explain - the numbers represent the candidates and always have): we get all sorts of pissed off at how simple everything turns out to be, and lament the hours we've devoted to solving this complicated mess, when it turns out to be ridiculously UNcomplicated in the end.

Posted by: Kolby at May 13, 2010 11:12 AM

Oh I still love this show, I do, I do. But, yes, Yoss only speaks the truth, the character development of the OG Losties and Ben etc etc has gone to sh*t. I still found the action and the acting of Jacob and the MIB the other night to be compelling and natural. Maybe that means I need to go into therapy for sibling rivalry issues. The Mother character, on the other hand. Yeah, batshit insane has never been my favorite flavor of character.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 11:12 AM

Yeah well, apparently we're all a bunch of idiots for having faith in these producers and writers. I suppose that's why I'm so angry.

*stepping away from the computer*

Posted by: Cindy at May 13, 2010 11:13 AM

Also, all this frustration? Is why I read spoilers. Seriously, they're like Xanax.

Posted by: Kolby at May 13, 2010 11:19 AM

Kolby, I thought you didn't read spoilers? I thought you were a purist? Also, I think a lot of this anxiety comes the the machine that surrounds Lost. I watch episodes online and walk away from any commercials so I never see promos so I never feel like I'm been promised anything. I also try to ignore what the producers have said outside the show. And I CERTAINLY ignore any rumors I hear about Henry Ian Cusick (LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU, BRUTHA!). So maybe that's why I just don't care. I'm not trying to be smug in any sense, mind you. I'm just having so much trouble relating to the bile and maybe that's why?

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 11:22 AM

>>>>>> If you're gonna bust out a damn polar bear mysteriously living in the tropics, you better explain that shit.

They did. The polar bears were part of the Dharma Inititative. I'm pretty sure this was answered way back in the third season.

Posted by: Sarah at May 13, 2010 11:26 AM

I've never even been to the Lostpedia page, and have refused to go there when people linked to it. I've ignored interviews, previews, spoilers, EVERYTHING that wasn't on the show. And I'm still pissed.

You know what it is? It's disrespecting the fans. It's telling us that they've been dangling a carrot in front of our noses all along, we've reached the end of the road and they won't give us the carrot because that was totally their plan all along and life is just not fair and it's all a mystery, so don't expect no carrot.

And ok I'm sure they'll resolve some big things, but if they were REALLY good they'd tie EVERYTHING together. But they're not. So they'll just leave shit dangling everywhere.

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 11:28 AM

DUDE.

If you’re not going to answer those questions, then why did you bring it up in the first place?

AMEN!

I really think that, before they set their finale deadline for 2010, the writers were looking to fill time and starting adding storylines willy-nilly. Then, once they announced the deadline, they had an "Oh, shit!" moment when they realized they didn't give themselves enough time to wrap everything up. I know that there's no reason to expect everything to be all wrapped up neatly with a little bow, but after sticking with the show all this time, I feel I deserve some answers, and I know I'm not the only one who feels that way.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at May 13, 2010 11:28 AM

Golf clap KBalls.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 13, 2010 11:29 AM

OK I have an idea. Everyone try to think of the top...FIVE questions they want answered before the show ends. Hell, three would do. Then let's all post them here or next week's Lost thread (so we have time to think about it, I guess) and we can see what we come up with. See if everyone has the same big questions in mind, and then we can see if they get answered. How about it?

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 11:37 AM

I like that Figgy.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 13, 2010 11:40 AM

*puts on pants*

*doffs cap and bows*

Well played, Mrs. Julien.

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 11:40 AM

figgy,

I have four up there at 10:48 a.m. to start us off.

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 11:41 AM

I kind of agree with Kballs, but y'all are taking this shit way too seriously. It's a TV show, not a religion. It doesn't have to answer every question. It's just entertainment.

I thought the Jacob/Brother episode was... meh, but it doesn't bother me all that much. It was an explanation, just not a great one. They can't hit it out of the park every time. Ironic, how the least interesting episode involves the supernatural beings, rather than the fragile, confused humans.

Posted by: Slash at May 13, 2010 11:46 AM

Here's my first question:
Am I okay with having the inevitable deus ex machina be, literally, god?

Posted by: Anna von Beaversmack at May 13, 2010 11:52 AM

Slash, read the freakin' comments and you can easily see that NO ONE HERE wants every damn question answered. We just want the writers to have some goddamn respect for their viewers and fans. THAT IS ALL.

I'm done. I'm gonna go watch some videos of puppies or something while I think of my 5 questions.

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 11:52 AM

Questions:


- what is the significance of the numbers? Why do they have the effects that they do (particularly on Hurley pre-crash)? Is it just a mechanism for Jacob to exert supernatural influence on Hurley's life?

- What does Desmond know and how does he know it? What is his objective in each timeline and how does his knowledge support the decision he is making (to run over Locke in one timeline and follow him to be pushed down a well in the other)?

- What does Widmore know and how does he know it? What has motivated his actions in the early seasons and what is his objective on the island now?

- Explain Ben Linus. Provide a logical reason for any of his actions. Why was he leading the others? What was he leading them for? Why did he kidnap children and kill people? He did some crazy shit in the first few seasons and always had mysterious 'for the greater good' reasons for it. If he was acting for the greater good what did he think that greater good was and how did he arrive at that conclusion? What was he being told and who was telling it to him? What did he think he was going to accomplish?

- Explain what Jacob learns or realizes between the first century AD and the twenty-first century AD about his role on the island that causes him to do everything he does. If no one teaches him about his powers, does that mean he just has an instinctual feel for them, and how they work? Does someone/something (God? The Island?) tell him the names of the people he needs to touch and the things he needs to do or does Jacob just make it all up on his own, relying on his own intuition after centuries of life and observation on the island? If Jacob is acting on his own what are the guiding principals that motivate his actions and how did he determine that they were the best course of action. If someone/something is advising Jacob, what is it and what is its nature?

Posted by: Yossarian at May 13, 2010 12:21 PM

RE figgy: "Slash, read the freakin' comments and you can easily see that NO ONE HERE wants every damn question answered. We just want the writers to have some goddamn respect for their viewers and fans. THAT IS ALL. I'm done. I'm gonna go watch some videos of puppies or something while I think of my 5 questions."

Take a chill pill while you're at it. Might do you some good.

Posted by: Slash at May 13, 2010 12:23 PM

I like Yossarian's questions, and will be happy to just get answers to those.

I am not focusing on the polar bears, per se. My point is, if you're going to put odd things in an odd place, I want to know the value of those odd things and place. That's all. I don't think that's an unreasonable expectation to hold.

If all along the whole story was going to boil down to an ex deus machina, I wouldn't have spent a minute thinking about anything I've seen on this show, except the hotness. I don't regret a minute I've spent thinking about the hotness. :)

Oh, yeah. And the smoke monster. WTF is that?! That's one of the biggest mysteries, from the very beginning, and if they don't feel like answering that, then fuck 'em.

Posted by: Chickaboom at May 13, 2010 12:33 PM

Expected.

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 12:34 PM

1) what's up with the pregnancies on the island?
2) How did Jacob leave the Island, but MIB couldn't?
3) what was 'the incident'? what did the nuclear bomb do to the Island?
4) How did Jacob KNOW about the candidates, and how to build his magic mirror and how to go to them?
5) what is in the golden pool, and how does it turn MIB into Smokey? How did Smokey project the images to people like Ecko or Locke? What IS Smokey?

Posted by: figgy at May 13, 2010 12:40 PM

Yossarian, you really care about the numbers? That's one of the few cool things that I have no trouble letting go. They just are.

Mine:

1. What is the island. Is it a manifestation of the balance of good and evil, meant to keep the rest of the world in balance? Is it a station between life and death? Part of the physical world or not? How did the island come to be what it is?

2. Who was the first being to understand what the island was and how did that being come to understand that it needed to be protected?

3. How was the island able to time-skip and how was the exit to Tunisia (which also involved time) created?

4. Was there a specific reason the people who were touched by Jacob chosen and if so what was the reason?

5. What affect has Desmond had in the sideways and is he time-traveling there?

Posted by: Cindy at May 13, 2010 12:44 PM

Yeah, I think my other thing about this episode was that: is that supposed to be the answer to the smoke monster question? Because it's not. It's an apparently sentient plume of black smoke that came out of the cave where the light was, where Brother's body was tossed. That doesn't say what or how or why it was.

And then, what about Mother Dearest (hee) saying that dead was something he'd never have to worry about? And then he's dead? That's another question. Are these dead people dead, or are they not? It's been repeatedly insinuated (oh, and flat-out stated) that Jacob and his Brother can't be killed, yet they both were. What? Riddle me that one, Batmanuel.

Posted by: Anna von Beaversmack at May 13, 2010 12:46 PM

Hey Slash, maybe we all need a chill pill, but maybe it's also not your place to tell others how seriously they are or should be taking something.

Posted by: Cindy at May 13, 2010 12:49 PM

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaalt

Posted by: CT at May 13, 2010 12:50 PM

Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse are two of the most arrogant mother fuckers I have ever come across in my life. I read half of that interview and it just made me throw up in my mouth.

Posted by: michaelceratops at May 13, 2010 12:59 PM

AvB pardon me if I am wrong, but I think it was stated that Jacob and MIB cannot kill each other ("I've made it so you can't hurt each other!") They can (and were) killed by others.

Posted by: Scully at May 13, 2010 1:04 PM

I'm confused by these comments. Asking all the questions and then subsequently answering all the questions is not good story telling. This is a movie review website; of all people, you should understand this. Good movies don't tie up all the loose ends. Good movies make you think. Bad movies tie up everything in a neat little package at the end. Think about all of those terrible 80s movies that ended with a freeze frame of every character explaining what they did with the rest of their life. Terrible.

I'd rather leave some windows open on the show. It leaves room for debate and theorizing. It makes sense for a show like this, which was obviously more about process than product. I don't want to watch the final episode and feel like "Well, that settles that! What else is on?" That's what you do when you watch a shitty movie. When you watch a good movie, you debate about it for hours with your friends.

Posted by: mc at May 13, 2010 1:10 PM

But Jacob either killed his brother or at the very least beat him unconscious before throwing him in the water outside the Magic Light Cave. Either way, he hurt him, and now he's dead. And sitting on the beach, Brother asked Mother, "What's dead?" and her response was, "Something you'll never have to worry about." (I feel like there are other examples, but I can't think of any right now.)

I just read some of that interview, and I don't think I like the way that Cuse and Lindelof kind of reduce the audience to a single entity, and treat it as though it doesn't know the difference between what it wishes the story would do, and what constitutes bad storytelling. Yeah, I got mad about the Adam and Eve thing, but in the long run, I know that was largely disappointment because it wasn't what *I* had envisioned. The fact remains, however, that there were aspects of it that were not well done. And the fact remains that it kind of sounds like they're being very condescending to parts of their audience. There's no need for that, really. We're not stupid children.

"And the fans would say that we jumped the shark. I love the idea that some fans are literally saying we jumped the shark last night! 119 hours in! We finally jumped the shark! So good! You guys are going to spare yourselves the agita of the final three hours of the show."

See? That's just condescending. I mean, sure, it's kind of condescending to say the show's jumped the shark, but if that's someone's opinion, why do ya gotta put them down like that?

Posted by: Anna von Beaversmack at May 13, 2010 1:29 PM

RE Cindy: "Hey Slash, maybe we all need a chill pill, but maybe it's also not your place to tell others how seriously they are or should be taking something."

My place is everywhere. Look into your heart. You know it's true.

I do agree that the creators of almost any work of art, whether it be TV or book or painting are often very condescending. They put their shit out there, essentially asking for our input and when they get input they don't like (despite the fact that art can be interpreted many different ways, so the interpretations can't be "wrong," per se), they say WE'RE wrong because we don't see their vision the way they do.

That's why I enjoy art for what it is (mostly) and don't really give a shit how other people interpret it, not even the creators. I mean, I'm convinced that most of the Lost story is just purely them fucking with us, just throwing shit in there to see if we're paying attention. It's also gotten so goddam confusing that I literally can't keep track of everything, so I no longer try. I have a job. I can't spend every waking moment parsing every bit of Lost to try and figure out what the big message is. I'll discuss it until it gets old, then I'll stop.

Posted by: Slash at May 13, 2010 1:59 PM

Is it now that I mention that I think Ji Yeon is going to replace Jacob?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 13, 2010 2:17 PM

If there are 19 of us on here and a resulting 58 comments, how many
people does it mean are actually following this string? Who's lurking? Is it
really just us?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 13, 2010 2:24 PM

Mrs. Julien,

So there's 19 of us and 58 comments, and 58 - 19 = 39, and it is 3/14/10, so OUR numbers are:

3
10
14
19
39
58

Creepy, huh?

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 2:48 PM

Make that 3/13/10 . . . Awww fuck it.

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 2:49 PM

i'm lurking, cause that is what i do--mostly.

i will say that i agree with everything that coveredinbees said upstring. i don't like the thought of everything being wrapped up all nice and neat. i also refuse to read the interview and i try to avoid most outside information because Lost is one of the few shows that can surprise me, and i've enjoyed the hell outta the ride, so i want to see it through without too many preconceived ideas about where it's going to go or how it will get there.

i prefer to save my judgment until i've seen the whole story.

Posted by: pq at May 13, 2010 2:50 PM

I'M NOT ALONE! THANK YOU! Being alone was getting exhausting. And, hee, Kballs, nice numbers schtick.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 3:23 PM

I only have one question I need answered:

Do the main characters find some sort of redemption and/or peace? ie, does Jack get over his daddy issues, does Sayid find a way to be happy with Nadia and not feel like a horrible person?

For me, this is what the show is about, and it's all I really care about. To me, the island and all of its mysteries are basically just an elaborate obstacle course the characters needed to go through to feel some sort of meaning or peace.
.
.
.
That said, I will be fucking pissed if any of them turn out to be fucking angels.

Posted by: the essence of fanciness and class at May 13, 2010 3:48 PM

It's polar bears all the way down.

(Thanks, figgy.)

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 13, 2010 4:04 PM

Just to warn y'all, I don't know who is spreading them or where exactly they are, but I've read that there are now official series finale spoilers out there on the internet. If that's the case, I expect they'll only get more pervasive as we get closer to May 23rd. Hence, tread carefully! I expect Pajiba is safe, as I trust all of you, but I'm curtailing my LOST-related web-surfing immediately going forward.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 13, 2010 4:10 PM

Ok, I haven't watched the series start to finish, but have they EVER said what made Waaaaaalt so special? Like, did that kid have powers or what, and why the hell was he allowed to leave the island if he did?

Also - early on, the creators of "Lost" said that EVERYTHING ON THIS SHOW WOULD HAVE A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION and that there wasn't "magic" or whatever at play. Clearly that's just BS at this stage. Were they just lying liars who tell lies, or are they really just making this up as they go along?

Posted by: luthien26 at May 13, 2010 4:45 PM

official finale spoilers. drat. I'll keep a pact not to disseminate anything if I become infected. Good list of questions Yossarian. I would say that Eloise Hawking/Widmore are more perplexing than Charles Widmore. Isn't Charles just trying to tie a donkey wheel to the island's aether?

I don't know who suggested this show was going to light on the pseudo-science for the 6th season, but aether is totes pseudo-science. That's why I really do wish this cheeky "Answers" episode would have been aired as a Christmas special that way the Why of the island would actually stand a shot of adding mystique. Hell, it wasn't like Faraday's explanations of things cleared too much up. And I would have preferred Daniel Widmore dropping some knowledge rather than night-formulating.

If "It's a source of aether" becomes the only Why we get for the island, I, I, ....I swear I had something for that.

It's probably the lyrics Kolby posted on the recap thread, but I've been thinking about not being able to look directly into the light for in Plato's cave allegory, how the Roman etymolgy for bringer of light is gave us Lucifer, and how figs portends that rather than the AT giving all of the 'character' fans exactly what they want, the island dishes out the fates the characters deserve from their time there. I've never been a "this is hell" advocate but it does further support my feeling that the writers are giving up some ground to what the pop cultural impact has been for the show. I believe that whomever said that they are leaving mysteries unsolved so that this show gets talked about for hours after is correct. Whether its hours or years after will be determined by the strength or weakness of the finale?

Reading down the list of questions in this thread, I think that either you already know the answer to what you're asking and just don't want to accept that that's all you're ever gonna get; or that you're not going to get an answer at all. ---->How's that for a Darltonian enigma?

Posted by: Jackseppelin at May 13, 2010 4:47 PM

official finale spoilers? drat. I'll keep a pajiba pact not to disseminate anything if I become infected. I even hate seeing commercial for a show before it comes on, so I will not say a peep if I get spoiled.

Good list of questions Yossarian. I would say that Eloise Hawking/Widmore are more perplexing than Charles Widmore. Isn't Charles just trying to tie a donkey wheel to the island's aether?

I don't know who suggested this show was going light on the pseudo-science for the 6th season, but aether is totes pseudo-science. That's why I really do wish this cheeky "Answers" episode would have been aired as a Christmas special that way the Why of the island would actually stand a shot of adding mystique instead of just feeling like a fan-coerced addendum. Hell, it wasn't like Faraday's explanations of things ever cleared too much up before. And I would have preferred Daniel Widmore dropping some knowledge rather than night-formulating show-and-tell.

If "It's a source of aether" becomes the only Why we get for the island, I, I, ....I swear I had something for that.

It's probably the lyrics Kolby posted on the recap thread, but I've been thinking about not being able to look directly into the light for in Plato's cave allegory, how the Roman etymolgy for bringer of light is gave us Lucifer, and how figs portends that rather than the AT giving all of the 'character' fans exactly what they want, the island dishes out the fates the characters deserve from their time there. I've never been a "this is hell" advocate but it does further support my feeling that the writers are giving up some ground to what the pop cultural impact has been for the show. I believe that whomever said that they are leaving mysteries unsolved so that this show gets talked about for hours after is correct. Whether its hours or years after will be determined by the strength or weakness of the finale?

Reading down the list of questions in this thread, I think that either you already know the answer to what you're asking and just don't want to accept that that's all you're ever gonna get; or that you're not going to get an answer at all. ---->How's that for a Darltonian enigma?

Posted by: Jackseppelin at May 13, 2010 5:28 PM

Count me in as another one here on this thread, it takes forever to read through it all before I can add my 2 cents. Overall I agree that no one wants everything wrapped up in a little bow, because that is heavy handed and lame. But we need to have a better ending than say "The Sporanos" to make us happy.

I am not too dead set on certain mysteries being resolved, and I think that there is no way to please even half of us, but I hope to be entertained.

Oh and I have to say:
Think about all of those terrible 80s movies that ended with a freeze frame of every character explaining what they did with the rest of their life. Terrible.
Posted by: mc at May 13, 2010 1:10 PM

I think that would be awesome to see for the Lost characters, as a sort of Easter Egg on the DVD or something.

Posted by: Alli at May 13, 2010 6:36 PM

I've been reading and lurking, and while I was dissatisfied with this week's episode, I'm saving my anger (if needed) till the 23rd.

Posted by: Drake at May 13, 2010 6:37 PM

If you put "Military" and "flirting" together. You will get a place to meet military singles and admirers in the world! Are you a civilian looking to meet someone in the military? Are you serving in the military? You've come to the right place! We bring together single members of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, Coast Guard, Police Force, and Firefighters -- as well as civilians, veterans. Over the years, we have achieved tremendous success in bringing military singles and admirers together.

Posted by: lily at May 13, 2010 9:59 PM

i feel what you guys are saying, but we DO have three and a half more hours to go. they may answer ALL of kinds of shit in a completely fulfilling way.
don't fly into a tizzy and write it off just yet.

Posted by: um at May 14, 2010 10:34 AM

It may looks stupid, but I DO want to know why the fuck there was polar bears on the island. Fuck this, I want ALL THE ANSWERS ! Because to me, it's too easy to say "I'm not stupid, they can't answer to every little thing". Of course they can't, cause they waited until the 6th season to start revealing some answers ! You cannot just show fucking polar bears on this island without saying why they're there ! Everybody finds this ok cause they're biggers questions that needs to be answered. To me those bears are a big deal ! "It's just part of the mystery"... Fuck this.

Posted by: ElBlattabo at May 14, 2010 6:36 PM

And why the shark had a Dharma initiative logo on its skin ?

Posted by: ElBlattabo at May 14, 2010 6:52 PM

golfclap 2u mz julien, for the lurker numbz :)
>>>>>>>>

i'm tryin to reserve judgment til it ends.

i must say though.. i have enjoyed the ride all these years. :)
but, i don't hold out too much hope that the creators will offer any respectful ending for the show's fans... i've been disappointed too many times b4.

Posted by: kikz at May 15, 2010 11:36 AM

AVB's simply ahead of the class, I actually was at the Dutch world cup game with him and his marketing chief a few days ago. He's an amazing producer.

Posted by: Orjan Nilsen at July 5, 2010 10:38 PM

Tiesto is amazing. I think the best tune he has is love comes again . I went to see him in holland. I wish he produced like that. He is the best i have ever heared

Posted by: James Zabiela at July 10, 2010 7:32 PM

I'm in my 4th month of my pregnancy and am loving it! Simply being pregnant is a delightful experience. There is gonna be not a single thing more cherished in this world than holding my new born child in my arms for the very first time. I can't wait to meet him! My dreams of being a parent is at last coming true.

Posted by: Adrianna Wileman at August 11, 2010 8:48 PM

Meanwhile, a different kind of trance, generally known as uplifting trance, grew to become well-liked. Positive trance got buildups and also complete breakdowns that were longer and much more do not forget that, getting a lot more primary as well as a smaller amount subtle than accelerating, with more easily identifiable music as well as anthems. Numerous such trance paths stick to a group type, offering a good benefits, constant construct, a dysfunction, after which a good anthem, a questionnaire aptly known as the particular "build-breakdown-anthem" type. Beneficial vocals, typically feminine, were also becoming more and more prevalent, contributing to trance's well-liked attractiveness.

Posted by: Trance at August 28, 2010 6:43 AM

Could not have been written any better than this. Go through this reminds me of my old sch colleague! He always kept blabbing about this.

Posted by: sex toys at September 21, 2010 1:54 PM

Rats desert a sinking ship

Posted by: Solange Blassingame at November 9, 2010 6:08 PM

ÉGUA cara pode crer os filmes do Leslie Nielsen marcaram minha infância e pq não dizer até hoje achamos graça dele! uma pena...D.E.P

Posted by: Aron Mccaleb at December 1, 2010 2:08 PM

There most be a solution for this problem, some people think there will be now solutions, but i think there wil be one.

Posted by: internet marketing at December 28, 2010 1:01 PM

How could i extend the range on the Wireless N router? We have an Xtreme N handheld router (Dlink). I must extend the reach belonging to the wireless signal. I discover how to do it for your G signal. I need to learn how to do it for an N sign. Is it possible to make use of regular N routers seeing that repeaters. If so, when will i configure them. Thanks for your information.

Posted by: Best Wireless-N Router at February 18, 2011 8:47 PM

Really great read about what is popular in other countries. You kindof gave me a new idea for new post for my blog. Just have to think through, mby translate some lines from your post, as there is no other way to write it as precisely and understandable, than you did. Wish you good luck and success with your blog. Cheers

Posted by: Heavy duty chair at March 8, 2011 1:41 PM