web
counter
 

The Hopelessly Hopeless Marching

By TK | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (39)



Episode-5-Amy-Andrea-Dale-760.jpg

It dawned on me this week that, despite the widespread chaos and devastation depicted in the first few episodes of “The Walking Dead,” we’d yet to actually see anyone die. That all changed in “Vatos,” and that trend was carried on in this week’s episode, “Wildfire.” At this point, readers of Robert Kirkman’s graphic novel series have accepted that they’re essentially abandoning chunks of whole cloth from the storyline, and frankly I’m perfectly OK with that, provided that this new direction promises new and interesting ideas. “Wildfire” definitely showed some promise, but was also a bit of a puzzler.

We pick up shortly after the rampage that closed out “Vatos,” with the group mourning their losses and at odds about what to do next. Andrea is near catatonic, holding vigil over the body of her sister Amy, while various other group members try to both console her and get her away from the body so that they can follow up on what needs to be done — namely, destroy the brain and get rid of the body. As has been the trend, “Wildfire” had its own unique themes, this time focusing on saying goodbye and transitioning to a new path. After the slaughter from the night before, it becomes clear that trying to hold their ground at the campsite is an doomed endeavor, so the discussion is split between heading to the Center For Disease Control headquarters (supported by Rick), while Shane wants to head to Fort Benning.

But the farewells were the key component to the episode’s success. “Vatos” featured a beautifully shot opening with Andrea and Amy, but the scene was bogged down by rather clunky dialogue and somewhat forced exposition. Truth be told, Laurie Holden as Andrea appears to be the more skilled actor of the sisterly pair, and that’s demonstrated aptly in the opening moments of “Wildfire,” as she slowly comes to grips with the loss of her sister. I felt as if I could forgive the writers for that stumble in the prior episode after seeing the artful and tragic way they handled Andrea’s mourning — going from shell-shocked mess to regretful remorse, to ultimately (thanks in part to a philosophical pitch-in from Jeffrey DeMunn’s Dale) steeling herself to finishing Amy off before she can fully become a walker. That final farewell, featuring a tearful confession and apologies, Amy’s slow rising, and an unflinchingly brutal coup de grâce, was one of the more poignant moments of the series.

That theme of saying goodbye was also a deft maneuver on the part of the writers, as they made the smart decision to splinter the group. Morales (Juan Pareja) and his family (who we never got to know anyway) decide to set out on their own, and not-quite prophetic Jim ends up bitten by one of the walkers from the night’s attack, forcing him and the group to make a new type of hard decision, one which made Andrea’s actions pale by comparison. It’s a smart decision — once the group goes on the move together, it becomes too large to drill down to the type of character development that the show’s creators seem dedicated to. The fracturing of this family of apocalyptic orphans enables them to create more drama by the departures (not to mention the deaths from the prior evening), as well as to begin focusing on a core group of characters.

Of that core group, the single most complicated dynamic is the slow-burning conflict forming between Shane and Rick. Rick continues to play the de facto leader of the group, a role he bears mainly because it enables him to do what he feels is safest for his family. Shane has become a far more complex figure, alternating from solemn counselor (his working to help Jim in “Vatos”) to scorned lover (the revelations about his lies to Lori), and now, to possibly unhinged x-factor. The scene of him and Rick patrolling the forest, arguing about what the plan is and ending with Shane steadily taking aim at an unknowing Rick through his rifle scope, throws wrench into their relationship — and into Shane’s mental state in general. I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say that, after seeing that scene (and Dale’s superb moment of reaction), that Shane… might be going bananas.

With each passing episode, I continue to believe that Jon Bernthal’s Shane and Norman Reedus’s Darryl may well be the best actors on the show, although Laurie Holden and Jeffrey DeMunn are moving up in the ranks as well. Daryl continues to be a harsh, pragmatic voice of reason, a fact that more and more of the group are beginning to see. He’s built for survival, and compromises only when left with no other options. Once again, what appeared to be obvious stereotypes on the surface reveal much more intriguing forces at play once that veneer is scratched away. Dale’s poetic waxings sometimes come off as a bit overwrought, but he does it with such gravitas and solemnity that it works in the larger context.

Finally, we come to the show’s — and perhaps the season’s — climax: the CDC, and the last man alive there, Dr. Jenner (Noah Emmerich). Not much can be gleaned from Jenner’s half-drunk, half-crazed ramblings other than what is either sinister government involvement in the zombie epidemic (isn’t there always sinister government involvement?) or their futile curing efforts, and the future of the series seems to be heading in an unusual direction. One of the things people appreciated about the comics (and I know I already said I liked the change in direction, but bear with me) was that the apocalypse was never really explained — it just happened, and it became the backdrop for a small-scale story about a group of tragedy-stricken travelers. Adding this new wrinkle risks making the story too big, removing that intimate, familial feel from the story. But then again, I’ve had my doubts and trepidations in the past, and the show has proven me wrong on more than one occasion.

In the end, we’re left with a great unknown, symbolized perfectly by the flash of light as those doors slowly creep open. What will come next remains, as always, to be seen. The herd is being thinned, and the choices are becoming more desperate. People are dying, and that’s something that viewers are going to have to start getting used to. It started with a lesser-known like Amy, but it’s only a matter of time before the ones we’ve grown to like start stumbling into the meatgrinder as well. The world of “The Walking Dead” is growing more complex, and with only one episode left in the season, the fate of that small group is still up in the air. While we’re fortunate to have another, lengthier season down the road, it will likely be months before we see it. In the meantime, how the group survives, whether or not they’ll be capable of continuing to stand together, or whether the twisted subterfuges of players like Shane will devour them from the inside, all keep us guessing and hoping for their good fortune.

I wouldn’t hold on to much hope, were I you.

TK writes about music and movies. He enjoys playing with dogs, raising the dead, and tacos. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Complete Metropolis Review | Yr City's a Sucker | Jennifer Lopez is the Most Fascinating | Also, I'm Really Looking Forward to That Minority Report Movie









Comments

1. I have ALWAYS wanted to see, on screen, what Andrea finally did. This is an important aspect of zombie lore which is so frequently untouched. Someone else always does the dirty deed. I'm proud of Andrea and so absolutely, completely and terribly stricken for her. I don't watch any shows live. I DVR them and at start them, at the earliest, 30 minutes after airing begins so I can skip commercials. Before Sunday night I have always raced past the commercials to keep the story moving as quickly as possible. Not this time. That first commercial break was, for the first time in my life, NECESSARY. Fucking amazing.

2. I don't know about anyone else, but I didn't like the dramatic shift from "Rick's point of view" to "third person observer" when we were taken inside the CDC with Emmerich's character. Somehow the show really lost speed and intensity with that. Not to mention a significant amount of personal feel.

Posted by: lubeg at November 30, 2010 1:47 PM

The first thing I thought when I saw the lone CDC guy was: "Look! It's Desmond in the hatch!" You can take it right down to the hasmet suit and the bright, white light as the big "reveal" when the doors opened. It's not a complaint, just an observation.

I think things are set up for a pretty good finale. I liked how they appropriately ratcheted up the tension. The people looked tired, scared, beat up. There was no real moment when anyone relaxed. Nerves were frayed. There were some attempts to comfort other people, Andrea and Jim, but other than that it was arguments and stress.

Ever since my friend pointed out to me that the guy playing Dale was the same guy who played the serial killer in Citizen X, I haven't been able to look at him the same way. I think he's doing a great job. His look at Shane when he saw Shane pointing the gun at Rick was fantastic.


Posted by: FordbiddenDonut at November 30, 2010 1:48 PM

For those that have read the books; anyone else getting the idea that Merle is going to be The Governor? Not a bad idea I guess and it will give the Rooker serious scenery chewing time.

Sometimes the tension on this show is almost too much. Amy's slow rise and Andrea NOT pulling the trigger right away was just excruciating. I don't know where the CDC angle is going but it's nice to be at a place in the story where everyone is in the dark whether you read the book or not.

The broken down RV confused me though. I guess Shane found a hose at that "maybe its a gas station" down the road. Really odd scripting there. One minute they are stuck, the next they have loaded Jim out and keep on rambling down the road.

Posted by: TylerDFC at November 30, 2010 1:51 PM

The CDC plot worries me greatly, but like you said, this show has surprised me more than once. At its core I think it will be a road trip through Hell kind of story, and this is just a small diversion.

...Tease us with the trap that so many zombie movies fall into, then remind us we are watching something quite different.

Posted by: Vince Noir at November 30, 2010 1:52 PM

I was really disappointed with the last ten minutes of the show. One of the best things about TWD is the feeling of claustrophobia, the fear of not knowing what's going on and the knowledge that you'll probably NEVER know. With one fell swoop they've essentially lost that. TWD is supposed to be the Wild West of zombie movies, not Resident Evil. I don't WANT to know where the virus came from, where it's spread, or what the government is doing to contain it, and I don't want the characters to know either.

In real life, with a media blackout, very few of us would ever know these things, and that was part of what I thought was so great about the comics. These people are on the ground. They don't have a bird's eye view of the situation; all they know is what they see with their eyes.

I'm sure they'll pull it out, and it's still a great show, but that was a major letdown for me. I had hoped they'd at least resist the temptation to widen the scope of the story until the second season. No such luck :(

Posted by: Paul Southworth at November 30, 2010 1:54 PM

TylerDFC: That would be interesting. But the Governor is another story whose execution on TV worries me. That whole thing unfolded so slowly, and it really requires Michonne's...interactions with him to be as devastating. You think the Guv will be in Season 2?

Posted by: Vince Noir at November 30, 2010 1:57 PM

Just jumping in for a minute on the Michonne subject: According to Robert Kirkman:

“I know Frank [Darabont] is very fond of that character... There was an early draft of the pilot that had Michonne [in it] but just in a cameo role. Frank likes her and everyone at AMC is aware that she’s a popular character. They’re just chomping at the bit to bring her to the show, so I’d like to introduce her very soon.”

So I'm guessing season 2.

Posted by: TK at November 30, 2010 2:00 PM

Speaking of Michonne, that's another "story" that worries me.

Unless they tone her down quite a bit, I am not sure how that character would come across on screen. Like Wolverine's yellow spandex, she seems like an idea better suited for the pages of a comic book than in live action, especially given the world they've been trying to create with the TV show. I can't see them getting rid of her entirely, but I think they should take some of the yellow spandex aspects of her and tone it down to regular old black leather.

Posted by: FordbiddenDonut at November 30, 2010 2:03 PM

I've been a fan of each change up until this point. One of my favorite parts about the original conflict between Shane and Rick was that it wasn't complicated. Shane thought there was going to be goverment assistance coming to save them (well, he didn't really anymore -- but that's the foolish power of hope), and Rick thought staying near the city was going to get everyone killed. Dropping that fundamental conflict annoyed me. The story worked on that simple level for a reason.

And you're absolutely right when you remark that part of the story's draw is that the Zombie Apocalypse is never explained. That's how I prefer my zombies (in fact, when I saw 28 Days Later, I arrived at the theater a few minutes late and missed the entire opening sequence with the labrotory and the monkey and all that -- I awoke when the main character awoke in the hospital, and loved it). This story, more than any other of the genre, is focused on character. It doesn't matter what caused it, and to see the show introduce ideas that even suggest a cause, makes me think they might've been led astray. Clearly they have a grasp on what makes the story tick, so I wonder how this whole CDC business got introduced. It isn't needed.

I'm glad that you made mention of that moment in the woods, when Dale sees Shanes murderous potential. I thought the actor simply nailed the reaction (shock, dissapointment, disgust, horror) and I'll be watching him in the future. Dale was my favorite character in the book for a long time, and I think the gentleman playing him is knocking it out of the park. Likewise, the actors playing Shane and Andrea are also killing it.

I can't wait for the final episode. But I'm afraid of the direction they're taking it.

Posted by: superasente at November 30, 2010 2:04 PM

Shane is a man without a country. In the space of a few days he's gone from being the leader of the group with a family to care for to having his spot next to Lori & Carl taken back by Rick and his leadership position usurped by Rick.

I think it's no surprise that Shane and Rick proposed opposite directions. I wouldn't be surprised if, at some point, the group is splintered by the two.

And Darryl, for all his crying over his brother, seems very pragmatic about his survival. He didn't leave a note or a message or seem to act as if he thought Merle would one day find his way back to him.

I got the sense that Dr. Jenner was looking for a cure and was the last guy left behind. But let's see how much of his mind is really left. I got the sense he might be a few animal crackers short of a zoo.

Posted by: Fredo at November 30, 2010 2:06 PM

Oh yesssss. Michonne is hands down my favorite character of the books. Bitch was HARD and kinda fucking nuts. LOVE!

Posted by: AlexaCastro at November 30, 2010 2:08 PM

Let me first start by saying I have never read the graphic novel (although I may need to rectify that). Having said that, I think the trip to the CDC was more than logical, and perhaps more integral to the overall feel of the series than we have seen. Given the refugees proximity to Atlanta & the nature of the illness, it makes sense for them to seek out "hope" there. In that vein, Rick's reasoning is spot on. Additionally, it may very well set up the described "feel" of the books. Meaning, the writers may be establishing tha the CDC is not the "last bastion of civilization." Ultimately it places the onus right back on the survivors to look to each other as a reason to survive. Not to mention the fact that dealing with it just gets the elephant out of the room. I mean, it's right there! Why wouldn't they try the CDC?

Posted by: Jason at November 30, 2010 2:11 PM

I am going to agree that the switch to the CDC scene was jarring when viewing the episode as a whole. I felt that they could have lengthened the trip to the CDC, and then put Jenners Scene at the start of the next Episode. Might have flowed better for me that way.

In retrospect the scene with Amy and Andrea was one I throughly enjoyed. Although during it I just kept thinking that Amy was goign to startle to life and immediatly overpower Andrea. Which created a lot of tension, im sure that was the point, and shocked me at the ruthlessness of the ending. I didnt think Andrea had it in her.

I also agree with the whole wierdness of the RV breaking down scene. Seems like they were only stuck for a few minutes whitout any real resolution to the RV breaking down and then they were off. It did'nt work well.

I did think that Daryl was going to plow an arrow through Jims head though. On less Zombie to plague them. But he proved stronger than that. I wonder if that turns out to be a mistake though... Psychic Zombie, he can be where you are going to go next and hide in your closet.

Posted by: Wolf at November 30, 2010 2:21 PM

The ruthlessness of Andrea? The fuck? Were we watching the same show?

That scene was heartbreaking because of Andrea's dedication to doing right by her sister. She certainly wasn't ruthless! She was tortured and burdened with sending Amy off in the gentlest way possible even though it was a disturbing and horrific task. The way she let Amy go is the way anyone would hope to be dispatched were they turned into a zombie, with compassion and love. She decided she would finally be there for her sister when her sister needed her and it was no easy task.

Posted by: becks at November 30, 2010 2:30 PM

Yeah, "ruthless" is the last word I would use to describe that scene.

Well, maybe "pizza" is further down on the list. And "cyclops." And "magazine."

Okay, there are probably thousands of words I would be less likely to use for that scene, but "ruthless" certainly doesn't fit either.

Posted by: superasente at November 30, 2010 2:34 PM

Bad editing with the RV repair for sure.

I'm more and more happy I didn't read the graphic novels before watching, I'd be comparing the two all day instead of just enjoying this for what it is.

Posted by: Mick J at November 30, 2010 2:35 PM

As far as the RV thing goes. Someone said they saw a gas station ahead and were driving ahead to check it out so maybe they grabbed something from there. Dale did say it was nothing but duct tape anyway, they could have gotten by on just that. (I know. It would have been nice to at least have someone point out that it was fixed or something before just driving off fine but I see it as a minor omission in an otherwise incredible show.)

Posted by: Paultera at November 30, 2010 2:40 PM

Well, my first guess would be because the CDC is pretty close to the heart of Atlanta. I'm not sure how you go from 'stay the fuck out of Atlanta' to just waltzing right in, but hey.

My guess is that they're going to try to go get Rick to get some living infected tissue for crazy doctor to play with. Hopefully I'm wrong, but we'll see...

Posted by: phaedawg at November 30, 2010 2:43 PM

Andrea's performance when dispatching her sister was breathtakingly pizza.

It could work.

Posted by: Paultera at November 30, 2010 2:44 PM

I actually just checked the location of the CDC on Google Maps. In real life, the CDC is located about 7 miles or so outside the heart of Atlanta.

Posted by: FordbiddenDonut at November 30, 2010 2:50 PM

I wouldn't be surprised to see Dr. Jenner lose it in the upcoming finale. He just ran out of his last good test sample and needs new tissue. Perhaps he will attempt to infect his new acquaintances so he can continue his search for a cure.

Posted by: BradyB at November 30, 2010 2:52 PM

First...I hate zombies. I mean I really hate zombies. They give me nightmares.
That being said, I'm totally sucked in by this show.
I think they might go back to find Jim for a recently infected "living" sample for that Jenner dude.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at November 30, 2010 3:23 PM

You know what I think is an interesting part of zombie culture often overlooked is the missing lips. Wouldn't it be great to see a scene where a zombie, desperate for food, eats his upper lip off? A lot of zombies seem to be missing lips, and that would be a great way of showcasing their thoughtless, animalistic hunger.

Posted by: Jared at November 30, 2010 3:27 PM

I'm so accustomed to seeing Jeffrey DeMunn (Dale) in small guest roles on the various Law and Order series, usually as some dipshit lawyer, that seeing him on The Walking Dead is an utter and complete revelation. I had no idea he was such a good actor. Ditto Laurie Holden as Andrea, and Jon Bernthal as Shane. This show has me in its dead, grasping clutches but good.

I'm also amused that AMC managed to snag two of the best actors in HBO's The Pacific for its series (Bernthal, and James Badge Dale for Rubicon). I fully expect to see Joseph Mazzello (Pacific's Leckie) to show up next season.

Posted by: PDamian at November 30, 2010 3:53 PM

Great show. It's getting better ratings than Mad Men and Sons of Anarchy combined.

The thing that sucks (in a good way) is that you don't know who's going to die next.

There's several characters I hope they keep around but seeing as how they've already deviated from the original comic book there's no telling if those characters will be around for the duration.

Posted by: John W at November 30, 2010 3:57 PM

regarding the read it / don't read it question: go ahead and read it. Most of the characters are in both and some of he story is familiar but it is kind of like the relation between old Star Trek and the newest movie. It is easy enough to think of them as completely separate stories and the books are too cool to miss, especially if you are a fan of graphic novels.

Posted by: midas89 (heavy) at November 30, 2010 4:10 PM

Things like the CDC plot are necessary to stop people from asking why are there zombies. We just need a simple answer and then we can forget the mistery of the zombie outbreak forever.

Posted by: Radlum at November 30, 2010 4:26 PM

@Jared
You know what I think is an interesting part of zombie culture often overlooked is the missing lips. Wouldn't it be great to see a scene where a zombie, desperate for food, eats his upper lip off? A lot of zombies seem to be missing lips, and that would be a great way of showcasing their thoughtless, animalistic hunger.

What?? That was so crazy and hilarious I just had to say something. Holy crap! That is some twisted thing to think of. Funny and quite possible I guess.
I thought watching a full series about zombies would be difficult to watch. A movie is a couple hours and that's it, but I have really enjoyed this show more than I thought I would. It does bring up interesting conversations with friends. "Man just shoot me in the head please and save yourself." I know if I am having this conversation just watching the TV show they had to have it amongst eachother so the sister thing was killing me. I knew she would do it, but very hard to watch.

Posted by: daria at November 30, 2010 4:35 PM

The last 10 minutes took me out of the story a bit. I'm expecting this CDC subplot to be a one-off ep and we'll find our survivors on the road again come the beginning of Season 2.

Posted by: stryker1121 at November 30, 2010 6:37 PM

TylerDFC, I like your theory about Merle being The Governor. Especially if they follow the progression of the books. The fact that Merle is missing a hand and will want some retribution fits, if you see where I'm coming from.

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at November 30, 2010 7:14 PM

I'm with Fredo. CDC is not a "what caused it" kind of thing, but a "search for hope that will soon be dashed" kind of thing.
I also agree the ending would have been more chilling if we didn't meet the Mad Scientist til next ep and just had the scene at the door.
My two cents.

Posted by: Odnon. at November 30, 2010 8:27 PM

FordbiddenDonut, I recognized Dale as Chikatilo instantly. I always think of the ending of Citizen X when I see him on screen and have to laugh before forcing it out of my mind.

I'd have to echo Fredo and Odnon. I didn't get the impression they'd explain the cause, it just seemed like a vain attempt at finding a cure. If they need a fresh sample of an infected person in the next episode, wouldn't Jim be handy for that? I did expect Daryl to kill him, though.

The scene with the sisters annoyed me. I'd have preferred it if someone shot me in the head after I was partially eaten, rather than have an agonizing death that resulted in me being turned into a zombie. I get what they were trying to do, but the whole time I kept thinking, "Just fucking shoot her already!"

As for reading the comics, I'm really going to need to get on that soon. I feel so left out.

Posted by: Uda at December 1, 2010 1:27 AM

I am really hoping they don't turn this into a Lost/Xfiles kind of thing where we're just watching them attempt to solve one big conspiracy/mystery thing. I'd hate this to turn into a "the zombies were a big conspiracy that got out of hand" thing. But I can see it going that route and that scares and saddens me.

But read the books. If you havent, you really are missing out. They're great.

Posted by: Lennon at December 1, 2010 5:07 AM

So, readers of the books, are there enough differences to the point that I can read the books fairly spoiler free? I avoided the books because I wanted to enjoy the show on its own merits, but now I'm curious about all the deviations the show has apparantly made.

Posted by: Steve at December 1, 2010 8:33 AM

Steve, the first trade has a pretty big spoiler that might ruin the season finale for you. I'd definately start collecting them if I were you, but I'd also definately wait until the next episode airs. If what I think is going to happen actually does happen (who knows).

After that you're cool. There are some pretty great twists and turns down the road, but nothing that I would describe as being "spoilers." Mostly it's just people dying. Those who are familiar with the story aren't kidding when they say that no-one is safe.

Posted by: superasente at December 1, 2010 10:26 AM

I think that TWD show is much more like The Stand meets World War Z than Lost. In The Stand, you see how the virus starts and escapes, but once the government loses control, it's a non-issue. In WWZ you see a lot of different perspectives, meeting and leaving characters but it gives you an overall view of what happened globally. In both the real meat of the story was the surviving and rebuilding of society. Granted, I hated the good vs evil of The Stand, so I'm thrilled that those themes aren't involved in TWD.

I like seeing that there is research going on somewhere, even if it's futile. One lone man slowly going insane, but still trying to survive and understand. His hope is as real as Shane's for an army base that offers protection, or Rick's for safe haven and a cure. The government doesn't have control (a la Resident Evil), there is no organized shelter. The CDC piece just showed how futile that hope really was. So far I'm with the show.

Posted by: Vee at December 1, 2010 11:47 AM

Here is my problem with this show. It is more unlike like the book than it is like the book. They are focusing more on new story elements than they are on the elements of the story that make the book so great.

Why did they introduce a group of hostile survivors already, the group in the old folks home? They establish the danger in finding other survivors way too early in the overall story. The greatest danger to these people should be the zombies. And it should be this way for a good long time. That is why the last couple pages of the volume 1 of the book are so good, because it is the first realization the there may be a greater danger in the world than zombies.

Speaking of zombies. Is this not a zombie show? Where are the zombies? When they were on the way to the CDC why didn't they run into a single zombie, or a wrecked car, or any other indication that they were traveling in a post apocalyptic world overrun by the dead?

The whole first season of this show should have been about avoiding zombies, killing zombies, and the effects of a zombie covered world on a small group of survivors, with a very slow build up to the realization that humans might be more dangerous than zombies.

They have gone way off track and focused on human conflict way too early, and for that reason I am slowly starting to dislike this show.

Also, it worries me that they can't drop any f-bombs on this show. That is what is lame about AMC. This should have been an HBO show. They will never show the Michonne/Governor scene, how could they?

Posted by: deeder at December 1, 2010 4:52 PM

This show needs Michonne. The scene where the women scrub clothes and cluck annoyingly about the division of labor. That is so fucking Dixie Chicks.

Michonne would be all Dolly Parton. She'd wash her own clothes naked and not give a fuck about who did what. Then she'd make a few Walker-Kebobs on the way back to camp and get to business.

I don't buy the Andrea is so compassionate take. She waited until Amy came back so she could unload her dirty conscience. Andrea did that for Andrea, and put the whole group at risk to do so. We yelled at the TV when she was yammering. "It's always about YOU, isn't it honey?"

The women so far do not reflect anything but random luck and association that would predict their survival. These women are the Hillary Clintons of the Apocalypse. They need some Michonne.

Posted by: Stacy D at December 1, 2010 9:56 PM

Here's my one gripe about this episode: Rick had made such a big deal about the sack of guns he had and how important it was to the survival of the group, even to the point of insinuating it was more important than some members of the group. So they get the guns and hand them out and they don't spread around too completely. That makes sense to me so far.

But if the lack of firearms is such a pressing concern, why was nobody picking up the discarded m16s and pistols that the dead soldiers in front of the CDC had? Even if just in the background Daryl or somebody was seen picking up a rifle from a soldier, just to make the point that, "Yes the group is grabbing these weapons, we just don't want to take too much screen time belaboring the point," I would have been fine with that.

I mean, why have a zombie apocalypse if there's not going to be even a bit of light looting and plundering of the dead?

Posted by: ASterisk at December 2, 2010 11:49 AM