web
counter
 

The Tender Breasts of Ladies Were Not Formed for Political Convulsions

By Aggie Maguire | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (24)



BE10-main.jpg

I have a confession. I am completely incapable of separating Lucy’s character in this show from the person projected by Paz de la Huerta in the attention-seeking interviews she gives. Who knows: it may all be some meta joke on her part. But when all she talks about is how she never wears underwear, loves to be naked, and how her sexual relationships are a reaction to her father not being around, it just skeeves me out completely to have to watch her naked on top of a man, moaning “daddy” over and over again. Toward the end of their sex scene on Sunday night, the hubby and I thought Van Alden was going to strangle Lucy, and we were both sorely disappointed that he didn’t.

But apart from that blimp in the proceedings, we had a really great episode this week. Michael Shannon did a brilliant job of falling apart. His scene with Margaret was shot so well. First of all he’s towering over her with fanatic zeal and she’s looking even smaller than her diminutive self as he lectures her on her morality, and then when she stood up to him, the angle they used and his body language actually made him look as if he was shrinking before our eyes. My only issue with this scene was that I thought he was going to reveal that he had found out more about her background because I don’t think I’m buying the parlor maid story anymore. I could accept that she learned some literature from reading in her employer’s library, but now she’s correcting Nucky on the history of US Presidents (and the citizenship exam didn’t come in until 1926).

All my favorites were back this week. I love the juxtaposition between Rothstein’s conflabs with his lackeys (he acts the mentor and reprimands them so calmly and they never fully sense the danger beneath the surface) and Nucky’s meetings with his guys where he’s much more authoritarian but never quite comes across as being in control in the same way as Rothstein. Another contrast I can’t fail to notice every week is their sartorial taste. Rothstein is so perfectly turned out all the time and Nucky, who is supposed to be so attuned to the right way of doing things dresses a lot more like Professor Marvel than the Wizard of Oz. This week we had a red check suit with salmon-colored shirt, a brown and blue tie and spats on his feet, and a carnation?

Chalky once again delivered. The few seconds between him pausing at the door and then turning around with his guns seemed to last for ages. You could see the realization and the fury and the immense effort to control it all pass across his face. Bravo Michael Kenneth Williams!

Placing Harrow in Margaret’s apartment is a welcome development in return for which I will forgive the annoying tin man contrivance. I sensed more than a spark between him and Margaret. I hope that was in the interests of long term relationship development and not just an expositional set-up for the ending shot of Margaret looking in the mirror at what she’s become. Interesting that she sees enabling of political corruption as more of a compromise than her personal situation.

Other nice snippets: Nucky’s pride watching Margaret address the League of Women’s Voters (although I wondered if these women would take Nucky’s mistress all that seriously); Sebso’s official explanation for how the witness got killed which boiled down to a rather timely “I didn’t want to touch his junk”; Capone’s introduction to the Jewish mob was much more romantic than the way it really happened but for the interior shots of that beautiful temple it was worth it.

The story line that bothered me this week was Jimmy’s. Beating up the photographer seemed wrong for where he and Angela are in their relationship at this point. He knew she’d had them over while he was gone. He had already suspected an affair so why react in such an incendiary way now?

Two episodes left and a lot of scores to settle, and it looks as if next week the Commodore betrays his protégé.

Aggie Maguire lives in a fly-over state where she enjoys waving at the people flying over and wondering if anybody ever waves back. She is a member of the Jane Austen society and a life-long supporter of the Home for Abused Apostrophes.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 23/11/2010 | "The Walking Dead" - "Vatos" | I Guess The Good Times, They Were All Just Killing Me









Comments

Cringe-worthy at times, but for all the good reasons.

I think the "Tin Man" allegory was exactly about that last shot of Margaret. She "sees herself in the mirror and doesn't recognize herself"?

And while Jimmy's rage/beatdown was impressive, it came off a bit hollow since: a)Jimmy has spent most of the last year since his return from Europe in Chicago and b)Jimmy had no issues with being unfaithful while in Chicago. I know it's the 1920s, but hypocrisy is hypocrisy.

Ultimately this was an episode of transitions: Capone is trying to move towards his destiny, Lansky manages to survive Nucky and Chalky's wrath, Van Alden has gone through the looking glass and surrendered all he held dear (and I wonder who he will blame for making those decisions)....

The question now becomes: who survives all this? It's unlikely that we'll see everyone back for Season 2.

Posted by: Fredo at November 23, 2010 1:07 PM

I thought the strangling scene was brilliant. Chalky's about my favorite character on the whole show.

I was also impressed by Margaret during the speech. She looked as if she felt slimy the whole time she was delivering it.

Posted by: Wednesday at November 23, 2010 1:23 PM

I think Jimmy's reaction wasn't hollow at all. It wasn't the right move and it certainly was hypocrisy but it's Jimmy. I would never be able to see him give her a pass just because he was unfaithful himself. It may be the 1920's but a hundred years later the reaction would be the same with a lot of people. Not right, mind you, but the same.

Posted by: Paultera at November 23, 2010 1:25 PM

"What tough guy? You gonna shoot me for mouthin off?"
"I wasn't going to, but you kind of talked me into it."

Best line of the episode

Posted by: Sean at November 23, 2010 1:28 PM

The first scene when Margaret's daughter screamed after seeing Harrow almost made my cry. I feel so much for that character. I was happy to see him accepted by her family.
Yes, Jimmy was hypocritical but what do you expect from him? He is not going to pick his battles and decide just because he got some trim he will excuse her from doing the same.
I'm curious what will become of Nucky and Margaret's relationship after next week. I know a lot of people don't care for her character, but I think her development has been pretty interesting to watch and measure. The compromises to her personality to become a kept woman has been interesting to see

Posted by: daria at November 23, 2010 1:31 PM

Don't get me wrong: I understand where Jimmy's reaction was coming from. I get that. But when you start peeling the onion and seeing his actions, well, I'm sorry, but his rage is misplaced (and not just cause he targeted the photographer and not the wife).

What would he have done if he'd figured out his kid meant the woman and not the man in the photo? Would he have beat her ass as badly?

Posted by: Fredo at November 23, 2010 1:46 PM

Paultera >> Bingo. That's exactly what I was going to say about this assessment of Jimmy's behavior. As realism goes, it was spot on to me. For some people, they can just move on in denial without asking the tough questions. When the object of denial presents itself so blatantly, though, the other shoe has to drop.

I must admit that I laughed when Jimmy put a bullet in what's-his-name's head at the end of the episode. Even though Jimmy does seem to be going down the road to sociopath, it was a very satisfying moment. That entire scene was great, even if I knew Meyer Lansky had to escape. (Speaking of famous gangsters that have to live on for the sake of historical authenticity, shouldn't Jimmy and his mom be dreading some payback from Lucky? I assume that will be addressed soon.)

I don't know much about parlor maids in the early 20th century, but I don't have any problem believing that Margaret is unusually intelligent and has read a lot in her spare time. Is that completely outside the bounds of possibility? I am very much enjoying this dance of moral ambivalence that Margaret is doing. The moment after her speech when she watched Nucky jabbering with the real power players instead of giving the prospective mayor his attention was on the money in conveying her disillusionment, which was a cool contrast with the actual pride I felt for her for doing so well in spite of her nervousness. I agree that it's interesting that she worries more about political corruption than her own personal situation; that's facet of her character is now one of the things I like best about her.

And once again this week, the part that you call a "contrivance" is something that I found genuinely affecting. I really dug the interaction between Harrow, Margaret, and the kids. Sometimes real people do use obvious metaphors; does that outlaw letting characters use them altogether in storytelling? I guess I'm a sucker.

As for Paz de la Huerta, I have no idea who she is other than Lucy, and I have zero awareness of these interviews she gives. She's just Lucy to me, which perhaps is fortunate judging by all this talk I've been hearing hear about her. Even without knowing anything about her, that sex scene was one of the creepier sex scenes I have ever seen purely based on the characters.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at November 23, 2010 1:51 PM

Fredo >> Funny you ask that. My roommate asked the same question while we were watching the episode. I quipped: "Of course he wouldn't have beat up the wife. He would have asked if they could have a threesome."

Posted by: DarthCorleone at November 23, 2010 1:55 PM

The sex scene with Lucy and Van Alden was traumatizing. I wondered if he was going to twist her neck 180 degrees ala the Bill and his maker sex scene from True Blood.

And I also think the "tin-woodsman" story and the family's gradual acceptance of Harrow was touching and was not diminished by the gratuitous mirror scene.

That scene got me thinking about more allegorical similarities with the show and The Wizard of Oz. Nucky is the Wizard, Margaret is Dorothy, is there a Scarecrow (Eli?)or Cowardly Lion (Doyle? -seems too minor of a character)?

Posted by: Alice at November 23, 2010 2:31 PM

I see Eli definitely as the scarecrow. Kessler is as warm and jovial as the lion but there's nothing cowardly about him as evidenced by last week's ending. Really Jimmy is the tin man: he's hard as nails but he has no heart anymore. It served a purpose with the children to give it to Harrow but that's not his role as I see it. Lucy is the wicked witch. The D'Alessios are the flying monkeys.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 23, 2010 2:51 PM

I do think Harrow's heart is broken, but not missing. The hopeless romantic in me saw a spark between Harrow and Margaret. Whether that is the spark of a genuine human connection, unique enough in this show and life in general, or something sexual, remains to be seen.

Jimmy's humanity is dissolving as he assumes his gangster role.

Posted by: Alice at November 23, 2010 4:02 PM

They officially lost me with this episode, although I am likely to keep watching and huff at the TV. The sex scene with Alden and Lucy was just blatant, revolting pandering because "it's HBO". It could have been accomplished with tighter camera shots. Just how much gratuitousness are they contractually-obliged to fit into each episode? I don't care if I'm being prudish. It's my lawn and I like it this way; furthermore, I have no need to see Paz de la Huerta's hedge.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 23, 2010 4:27 PM

Much as the Van Alden/Lucy sex scene brought bile to my mouth, I do think there was a reason for why it was so graphic. I think it was meant to be portrayed as depraved and ugly because that's how Van Alden sees it. It reminded me of some of the illustrations of scenes from Dante's Inferno and to Van Alden what he was doing was surely hellish.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 23, 2010 4:39 PM

I feel exactly the same way Mrs. Julien. That scene was gross and completely gratuitous. How about they focus on telling a compelling story instead of trying to cram in as much nudity as possible? Though after that mirror scene at the end I'm fairly certain the writers of this show aren't familiar with subtlety.

Posted by: becks at November 23, 2010 4:48 PM

I understood why I just didn't like the how. Van Alden makes me squirm uncomfortably any time he's on screen. I think they really could have accomplished the same thing showing less of her and more of his horror at his own actions. I mean, c'mon, how much of that secne was character driven and how much was "let's get her nekkid" driven?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 23, 2010 4:49 PM

I have been waiting for more than 2 months for Chalky to pull a gun on someone. God I missed Omar.

But, he isn't Omar. He is smarter, and more in control than Omar. And doesn't seem to have a sense of humor.

As for the sex scene. It was supposed to be uncomfortable. It was supposed to be dark and dangerous. Do I think they could have had less nudity? Sure. But she looks good naked. And it is refreshing to see pubic hair. I had forgotten what it looked like.

Posted by: Sean at November 23, 2010 7:43 PM

The look Nucky gave Jimmy after he shot that guy made it even funnier. And beating the photographer fit Jimmy's character perfectly. I thought it was great that his son referred to the photographer's wife as his mother's "kissing friend".

I liked the scenes with Harrow and Margaret. Particularly when he admitted to her that he didn't see past other people's looks either.

I think Lucy and Van Alden's sex scene wouldn't have worked as well if it were less graphic. Though I'm sure the fact that Paz lives to be nude made the decision that much easier for everyone involved. I don't like her, but she is perfectly cast.

Posted by: Uda at November 23, 2010 10:41 PM

I think Jimmy's reaction was perfectly logical considering the way the confirmation of his wife's infidelity came about. It's one thing to cheat behind closed doors, but it's a whole other thing to do it in front of the woman you're cheating with's own child while his father is out of the picture. Which is certainly the impression Jimmy had upon hearing about his wife's "kissing friend".

Also am I the only one that finds Harrow's mask to be way scarier than his actual face?

Posted by: wugirl at November 24, 2010 12:29 AM

No, wugirl, you're not the only one, I said something similar a couple posts ago.

Posted by: Uda at November 24, 2010 12:37 AM

Chalky once again delivered. The few seconds between him pausing at the door and then turning around with his guns seemed to last for ages. You could see the realization and the fury and the immense effort to control it all pass across his face. Bravo Michael Kenneth Williams!

I actually thought Chalky caught the slip-up when right after the guy mentioned it, because Chalky paused, examined the guy, then smiled slowly. The pause at the door seemed more like Chalky was trying to decide "should I dust these mofos now, or let Nucky in on the fun?" At any rate, MKW brings it so it's ready been broughten.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at November 24, 2010 3:23 AM

Jimmy's beating of the dude was more for his wife's benefit than anyone else's.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at November 24, 2010 3:26 AM

wugirl:

Me too. The mask is creepy. The face I could deal with.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 24, 2010 9:48 AM

Where is this week's (Espisode 11) recap? Why are you leaving me hanging?

Posted by: jollies at December 3, 2010 12:56 PM

Hi, I just wanted to let you all know that there is a project being conducted at Harvard trying to compile the most effective arguments for and against Wikileaks. I think it's a brilliant idea and would be an interesting read for many of you. http://www.voteonwikileaks.com

Posted by: Wikileaks Supporter at December 17, 2010 7:41 AM