web
counter
 

Without a Sign His Sword the Brave Man Draws

By Ted Boynton | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (29)



the_pacific_hbo.jpg

This is the first in a multi-part series examining the origins and progress of HBO’s original miniseries The Pacific. Full critical analysis will be reserved until the series has completed its run. Please note that this recap includes minor spoilers.

One of the most ignorant assertions in all of artistic history is François Truffaut’s claim that it is impossible to make an anti-war film because the medium inevitably glorifies combat as visually exciting. Whatever Truffaut’s virtues, he politicized himself to the point of irrelevance with this statement, at least as to its subject matter, though it might be fair to say simply that he had no pertinent masters to admire. In the hands of a skilled artist, the true nature of war is readily brought home as a horror, inspiring grim recognition in those familiar with it and grateful relief in those who are not. The foundation of Truffaut’s error is the assumption that one cannot honor the truth of sacrifice in combat while taking the position that war is to be avoided until there is no choice but to fight. Any film truly capturing the nature of war is, at some level, an anti-war film, in the same way that nearly every soldier who has truly seen combat would elect not to subject himself or his brothers to it again. It doesn’t mean they won’t go again if called; it means that the cost had damn well better be worth it, and we the viewers should appreciate the cost and be grateful for being spared.

Whatever else The Pacific may bring to the table during its run on HBO, its first episode follows in the tradition of Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, Saving Private Ryan, The Thin Red Line, and, yes, Band of Brothers in giving the lie to Truffaut’s notion. If the series’ tagline — “Hell was only an ocean away” — isn’t enough of an indicator, Episode One’s suspense-ridden crawl toward the inevitable meat-grinder of the Pacific theater of World War II certainly serves notice that there was no accurate notion of glory or excitement in the minds of the callow youths sent to oppose the aggression of the Empire of Japan against the United States in the Pacific region in 1941 and 1942. While not without its flaws, The Pacific appears poised to take its place in that noble line of cautionary tales of soldiers called upon to hurl themselves into a breach that no sane human would desire to fill.

From the outset, The Pacific, HBO’s original miniseries about the United States Marines’ combat experience against the Japanese during World War II, faces an incredibly daunting task: succeeding in the long shadow of what is quite simply the best miniseries ever filmed, Band of Brothers. It is impossible to evaluate The Pacific without reference to Band of Brothers, the 2001 HBO miniseries created by Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg, who are also the primary movers behind The Pacific. Band of Brothers told the sibling tale of the European theater of combat in World War II through the eyes of Easy Company, a ridiculously tough and effective outfit in the fabled 101st Airborne Division of the U.S. Army. The only thing more beautifully absurd than Band of Brothers’ tale of Easy Company’s legendary accomplishments and horrific casualty rate was the fact that the tale is entirely true; Easy Company saw heavy combat in most of the major U.S. offensives in Europe, and Hanks and Spielberg’s ten-part miniseries went to painstaking lengths to capture in great detail the experience of actual soldiers who lived, served, and died to defeat Nazi Germany. At the same time, Band of Brothers gently but grippingly dramatized the forging of those soldiers from raw civilians into battle-scarred soldiers, bringing home the universal horrors of war — Vietnam wasn’t the first time U.S. soldiers felt terror, pain, and confusion — and humanizing and explaining the habits and methods ordinary men use to get themselves and each other through such an extraordinary, hellish experience.

The Pacific takes what seems the only reasonable approach: to begin its story as if Band of Brothers never existed, grounding itself on the rock of historical fact and spooling out its story in its own course. The Pacific plainly goes to deliberate lengths, however, to avoid the appearance that it might try to outdo Band of Brothers. Eschewing Band of Brothers’s deep initial character development, The Pacific makes an election to reach hostile foreign shores early in the going. Likewise, where Band of Brothers’s combat narrative began in the immediate aftermath of D-Day, The Pacific effectively summarizes Pearl Harbor and the Japanese subjugation of the Pacific islands with a soft, atonal voiceover from Hanks, accompanied by brief interview snippets from surviving veterans, briskly setting the stage for the United States’ entry into combat operations. No dramatization is needed, of course, when the most recognized actor in the United States (non-clown division, for you Cruise and Cage fans) lends his gravitas to the proceedings. When Tom Hanks talks, we are genetically incapable of not listening, and The Pacific wisely elects to use his words to jump into the fray.

Where Band of Brothers dedicated its initial episode to following the raw Easy Company privates through basic training in 1942, The Pacific indulges in only a brief introduction to the characters in their domestic environment before moving to the combat theater. To a great degree, history works in its favor in this vein, as the United States’ first and most urgent reaction to the attack on Pearl Harbor was to mobilize for war in the Pacific — with the Japanese sewing up nearly the entire Pacific region over a six-month period, the U.S. had no real choice but to move as quickly as possible to defend Australia, in contrast to a more patient deployment in support of the relative stalemate between Britain and Germany in Europe. Because the Marines were the most combat-ready of the United States’ ground forces, they were thrown into action as soon as the U.S. could mobilize what remained of the Navy. Easy Company was still forming at Fort Toccoa in Georgia when the first Marines went ashore at Guadalcanal.

The plot of Episode One is quite basic. Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the story follows several young men as they prepare to ship out for the Pacific: Bob Leckie (James Badge Dale), a newly enlisted civilian whose Marine battalion will be among the first soldiers on Guadalcanal; Jon Basilone (Jon Seda) and his fellow non-commissioned officers already enlisted in the Marine Corps at the start of the war; and Sidney Phillips (Ashton Holmes), another new enlistee whose friend Eugene Sledge (Joe Mazzello, the boy from Jurassic Park) is despondent over a heart murmur that prevents him from enlisting. In Episode One, the story focuses primarily on Leckie, whose brief, chaste encounter with a neighborhood girl and chilly farewell from his father set the tone for thousands of unmoored boys dropped into tin cans and shipped thousands of miles across a sea they’ve never even seen.

The bulk of the second half of Episode One follows Leckie’s unit as it slowly advances across Guadalcanal toward a key airfield built by the Japanese. Following an anti-climactic beach approach — a virtual practical joke by the filmmakers, given the expectation of a Saving Private Ryan-style onslaught — the Marines’ objective becomes a march across the island to take over and secure the Japanese airfield. Episode One is fraught with suspense as the soldiers cautiously advance through a presumably hostile jungle while encountering no real resistance. (We know from the commercials that a war eventually happens.) When the soldiers finally encounter the Japanese, the contrast is as sharp as a bullet suddenly hissing by, and the Marines meet their first real test.

Episode One’s primary themes are foiled expectations and the lesson that this war will be one of lethal patience, slow advances, and creeping, rotting attrition. The Pacific theater of World War II has traditionally received far less attention in American history books than the war in Europe and Africa, a war fought in places with at least somewhat familiar names from France, Belgium, Germany, and Italy. Yet one of the most overlooked aspects of 20th Century history in the United States is the breeding of a generation of soldiers who believed that inexhaustible patience and endless resources would allow the United States to win a tropical jungle war against experienced jungle fighters. Twenty-five years later, the United States military would rely heavily on policy-makers’ experiences in Guadalcanal and the Philippines to extend a far less popular jungle war in Southeast Asia.

In its first episode, The Pacific is at its best with not-so-subtle jabs at the follies of our perceptions of war, some eternal, some era-specific. During a family gathering prior to soldiers’ shipping out, a family member delivers a toast in anticipation of a day “when this is all over, say a year from tonight.” When the soldiers are ashore and entrenched on Guadalcanal, they cheer the nighttime burning and sinking of a ship, assuming it to be Japanese, only to learn the next morning that the U.S. Navy intentionally scuttled a damaged ship and left under heavy fire, essentially stranding the Marines in enemy territory with no backup ammunition or medical supplies. Later, the young Marines are stunned to witness the Japanese soldiers’ fearless charge into machine gun fire while retaining their ferocity and defiance even in the face of hopelessness.

While the acting and cinematography are generally quite strong, The Pacific feels a little clunky in the early going in terms of pacing and direction. Particularly in the first half of Episode One, the expository dialogue and familial set-ups feel a bit forced. As The Pacific eases into its stealthy jungle patrol, however, it finds its stride in examining the wholly unpleasant business of trying to kill other people and avoid being killed, while at the same time navigating entirely foreign terrain. Episode One also effectively sets the stage for the moral conflicts involved in fighting even the most just of wars, from the casual torment of a defenseless enemy to the racist jingoism so common in rousing a nation to fight (a phenomenon fresh in the minds of 21st Century Americans). Although not without flaws, The Pacific makes an encouraging start with the promise of a challenging look at the lesser known side of the Unites States’ greatest historical moment. I can’t wait.

HBO’s The Pacific airs for ten consecutive episodes Sunday nights at 9:00 p.m. Eastern.

Ted Boynton is a dedicated sot who holds down a job and a wife, three hours each per day, whether they need it or not. Readers may scold, hector, admonish or taunt Ted by e-mailing him at thecarygrantrules@hotmail.com.









Pajiba Love 03/16/10 | Showgirls Review













Comments

So you liked that they skipped basic training?

*sigh*

Am I the only one that didn't? I already don't feel as attached to the characters in The Pacific as I did to the ones in Band of Brothers.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at March 16, 2010 2:40 PM

I have a feeling they will be revisiting basic training via flashbacks... at least I hope.

Posted by: Colin at March 16, 2010 2:49 PM

Well, you don't have that attachment... Yet. BoB has the advantage of time and being able to look at it as a whole. The Pacific has the onus of living up to it's predecessor as well as being it's own entity.

I guess what I'm saying is that it's only aired one ep... give it a chance?

Posted by: Idris_Arslanian at March 16, 2010 2:54 PM

I liked it. It took a lot for me and the boyfriend to not compare it to Band of Brothers, but in the end I thought it was well-acted and beautifully shot. And insanely tense. I'm really looking forward to the rest.

Posted by: Julie at March 16, 2010 3:10 PM

Who is going to be the WTF Jimmy Fallon cameo of this one?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at March 16, 2010 3:26 PM

Well done, Ted.

Regarding the back story, the rumors floating around are that the series will delve more heavily into the back stories by the third episode. Like we're going to stop watching anyway.

Posted by: branded at March 16, 2010 3:31 PM

I think the main problem The Pacific will face will come from the source material - in the fact that there are two memoirs this series is based on, whereas Band Of Brothers is based on one book by a single author. Band of Brothers was essentially ready to film.

Another issue, and one that isn't the fault of the film makers, is the general ignorance, on the part of most Americans, of what happened in the Pacific theatre of WWII. It's just not talked about in schools in the same detail as what happened in Europe. It's a totally different story about a totally different war. Maybe it's not romantic enough?

Posted by: Kolby at March 16, 2010 3:38 PM

My Grandfather was on the Belleau Wood in the Pacific.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Belleau_Wood_(CVL-24) His entire fight crew was killed by a shot down Kamikaze.

He never talked about the war. I hope this series will be an insight into that theater of war.

I actually know a man who was portrayed in or at least participated in the Band of Brothers. He used to come into our Antiques Store and chat with me. Not about the war, just friendly. He was interviewed on the show, taken to Europe by HBO for research. He never talks about it, but I am so glad he helped that series to be made.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at March 16, 2010 3:39 PM

My Uncle, Marine Sgt. Melvin Walden was among the first to advance on the beaches of Iwo Jima. The experience was so horrific that it, quite literally, caused him to mentally break down and he never fully recovered. In and out of the State Hospital for the rest of his life, he would have flashbacks and sincerely believe that family members were actually Japanese soldiers trying to kill him. God rest his soul, I hope that he found peace at last.
Thank you, Ted, for an insightful, intelligent and beautifully written piece.

Posted by: Spender at March 16, 2010 4:13 PM

I quite liked it a lot, too. I liked that I don't know the main characters yet but probably will through their battles and the moments in between. And I loved the tense waiting for some actual conflict, something I don't see very often in war movies.

It was kind of odd watching this first episode with a man who had a lot of horrifying experiences with the Japanese during WWII, including his village being massacred. This man has the attention span of a 3-year-old boy. He was totally riveted.

And some of those boys were not unattractive, either.

Posted by: Annika at March 16, 2010 4:43 PM

Excellent review, Ted. I watched the first episode twice. Once with my kids awake and driving me crazy, and then again after they went to bed and I could more fully engage my attention. I think that once the series in a few episodes in and has had time to stretch and breathe, I'm going to find I like it as much as Band of Brothers.

It feels a little more personal to me, as my grandfather was a WWII Marine veteran and fought in the Pacific theater. He died in 97, but my grandmother still keeps the plaque and phial of black sand from Iwo Jima mounted on the wall by his empty chair at the head of the table. I have a picture of him standing with his company in the jungles of some tropical island, a big smile on his face. Obviously they hadn't gotten to the hard part yet.

The only story he ever told about the war was about how his whole company was given cold weather clothing and told to prepare for a land invasion of Japan. Then we dropped the bomb he didn't have to go.

Posted by: Snath at March 16, 2010 4:48 PM

Yea! Boynton's back.

Mr. PaddyDog went against my wishes and resubscribed to HBO for this one (I'm still bitter about Deadwood, and would have preferred to watch in a friend's house so HBO doesn't get my money). Overall, a solid 50 minutes of drama. But that was my problem: 50 minutes (HBO is famous for the 50 minute hour). Couldn't the series premiere have run two eps together to allow us to become more vested in the characters? As branded said above, we're going to watch anyway, but I want to wait all week on edge for the next episode, not decide I'll catch it on On Demand.

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 16, 2010 5:42 PM

An excellent write-up, Ted. I had no idea this miniseries was going on despite having HBO. OK, I've only recently started watching Band of Brothers too. I'll be sure to put it on my schedule.

Posted by: admin at March 16, 2010 5:47 PM

My grandfather also fought in the "Pacific Theater" - I'm not sure exactly where. He was just a little too young to enlist, but he somehow managed to lie and go anyway. By all accounts, he was never the same after. Sadly, I only know him as an angry person who I don't particularly like.

Clearly, this is a part of history that we (Americans of post-WWII generations) need to know more about.

Posted by: MM at March 16, 2010 9:20 PM

Coming from Australia, I dare say it is the opposite for us and we are taught as much about the war in the Pacific as any other aspect of WWII.
I think I've posted this here before, but working in pubs years ago, I often served diggers who served in Papua New Guinea and Tobruk. I'll never forget one gentleman telling me about lying about his age to go on the biggest adventure of his life.
His first night in Lae, Papua New Guinea, he and the rest of the men serving were treated to a film being projected outside. He quite vividly told me about hearing a shot and the soldier sitting next to him snapping back and then slumping where he sat. He said he had pissed himself and kept mumbling that he was ready to go home now.
In my time pouring beers for those men, I heard a lot of stories. Some were funny, most were horrifying and all they told me, were for my benefit.

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at March 16, 2010 10:55 PM

Coming from Australia, I dare say it is the opposite for us and we are taught as much about the war in the Pacific as any other aspect of WWII.

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at March 16, 2010 10:55 PM
---
This was true for me, as well, coming from the Philippines. Particular emphasis in this part of history lessons include the naval battles in Corregidor and Bataan.

I'm actually setting myself up for a lot of tense moments for The Pacific, as it's a known fact [at least, for Filipinos] that there were more bleak moments in this war than usual especially when the US passed the Europe-First policy.

Posted by: ilikepie at March 17, 2010 12:08 AM

I think the main problem The Pacific will face will come from the source material - in the fact that there are two memoirs this series is based on, whereas Band Of Brothers is based on one book by a single author. Band of Brothers was essentially ready to film.

Well, I don't know if this will help at all, but one of those memoirs, EB Sledge's "With the Old Breed" is widely considered the finest American memoir of WW II. Not the finest "Marine memoir" or the finest from the PTO, but the finest of ANY.

I can't say in advance whether Spielberg (et. al.) will manage to capture the qualities of Sledge's book, but I will say that having read extensively, I've got no argument with its ranking; it's plain, unadorned, straightforward writing that describes a horror nearly beyond comprehension.

All war may be Hell, but there are certain theatres in certain wars that stand apart in the starkness of their brutality and madness. The island war the Marines fought against the Japanese was one of those conflicts; it was, as John Dower titled it, a "War without Mercy".

Some suggested reading, if anyone cares to learn more:

EB Sledge: "With the Old Breed"
William Manchester: "Goodbye Darkness"
George Feifer: "Tennozan"
John Dower: "War without Mercy"

The 1st 2 are memoirs from Marines; the 3rd is an overview of the battle for Okinawa taken from recollections from both sides and the last is an overview of the racial and cultural mindsets of both the Americans and the Japanese.

Posted by: Soylent Green is Sheeple at March 17, 2010 12:30 AM

Oh and I don't know if this will come through, but this is one of the most infamous of all Life Magazine cover ... from May of 1944, it's from an American Naval Officer in the Pacific to his sweetheart, inscribed with the simple notation Here is a good jap ... a dead one.

Posted by: Soylent Green is Sheeple at March 17, 2010 12:35 AM

Oh and Ted, it's a minor point, but telling to the topic and the men involved, they're never referred to as "soldiers", but always as "Marines".

Posted by: Soylent Green is Sheeple at March 17, 2010 12:43 AM

Would have liked it better if done from the eyes of carrier pilots. The carrier was the war machine that made the biggest impact in the Pacific and carrier tactics and flying was done on the fly(no pun intended). It would not have to be Top Gun like, but it would have broke new ground and provided true insight beyond what we know of earlier carrier warfare thanks to the movies, Tora Tora Tora and Midway.

Great review, thanks for the effort.

Posted by: richmac at March 17, 2010 1:27 AM

Watched it last night and thought it was a good start to the series. The Pacific War is incredibly interesting to me and I hope this series can match the emotional impact "Band of Brothers" had on me. The concentration camp episode is something I don't think I will ever forget.

Posted by: schrome at March 17, 2010 9:56 AM

I agree, Soylent Green, that you probably could not find a better memoir of the experiences of the Marines in WWII than With the Old Breed. It's an amazing read, and I meant not to disparage it. My point is that it may be difficult to reconcile the different experiences and viewpoints in the seperate source materials used for The Pacific. The screenwriters more than likely had an easier job when writing Band of Brothers.

Posted by: Kolby at March 17, 2010 11:11 AM

I would like to add that Bob Leckie as referred to in the review is the author of "Helmet for My Pillow" the other book on which the series is based. He became, among other things, a popular historian and I can recommend his histories of the American Revolution and the Second World War. The books are well written and very accessible to those who would like to know more about our history.

Posted by: Charles Vekert at March 17, 2010 4:09 PM

"...the U.S. had no real choice but to move as quickly as possible to defend Australia..."

What the?? That's a fairly narrow interpretation of the situation!! But what we've come to expect from everyone's supposed hero, USA.

Check out Changi for a different perspective on Pacific war stories.

Posted by: Nxx at March 17, 2010 11:13 PM

I liked it okay. I wasn't expecting it to live up to "BoB" -- and it didn't. But it was still good.

It wasn't until we were well into the episode that my friend piped up, "Hey! It's Chase from '24'!"

And that John Basilone is a hottie. I used to drive down the 5 to San Diego a lot for work, and had no idea that John Basilone was such a hero (the stretch of freeway by Camp Pendelton is named after him).

Posted by: Jelinas at March 18, 2010 4:36 AM

I believe the reason they bypassed any training stories was for a few reasons. The focus isn't on a particular company like Band of Brothers, making it difficult to jump between characters across the country, and the fact that most Marines during the initial combat periods were rushed through training. All I know is that if they don't show Chesty Pulley point out to some naval ships where to shoot on the beach I am gonna be pissed.

Posted by: Gamal at March 18, 2010 8:35 AM

This was pretty decent. I was tense throughout the ep and when the shooting started I liked how it was confused and noisy.
I thought the best moment was when the big dude who was bragging about taking on a Japanese regiment himself ended up crying in a hole unable to do his job.
It is somewhat well established that braggarts and model garrison troopers tend to not do well when the shit really starts.

Posted by: williamx at March 20, 2010 6:42 PM

Thanks, Ted. We saw episode 3 last night, and I'll agree with you on just about every point. (And thanks, esp, for pointing out that Eugene Sledge is the boy from Jurassic Park. I was having one of those can't-place-him moments.)

I don't think the slow character development will end up hurting the mini-series. I think HBO generally does a fine job of beginning in medias res with its characters, and that is one aspect I enjoy of HBO programming. They are good at not over-telling and at assuming the audience has a brain among them that can figure things out. I like letting the characters grow on me over the course of a few weeks instead of programs using lots of shortcuts, stereotypes, and sentimentality to manipulate my emotions and drag me into a soap.

Keep following up, Ted!

Posted by: Janeite1900 at March 29, 2010 4:08 PM

---Great! -yet another batch of anchronistic,
over-produced, done-to-death PC WWII retreads
---in 2010 ---on the once again 'mysteriously
overlooked' 60th Anniversary of the urgently
relevant, STILL unfolding KOREAN WAR!

---------Impeccable timing.

Posted by: tiger tim at April 19, 2010 4:28 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time