web
counter
 

The James Badge Dale Audition Tape

By Ted Boynton | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (10)



leckie.jpg

This is the fourth in a multi-part series examining the origins and progress of HBO’s original miniseries The Pacific. Full critical analysis will be reserved until the series has completed its run. Please note that minor spoilers are included below.

Ten months after the First Marine Division arrived in Melbourne, Australia to thunderous, grateful applause, the same Marines shipped out with a return ticket to their jungle nightmares, this time headed to an island called New Britain. As they celebrated Christmas on their naval transports, the First Marines’ military objective was relatively straightforward: the capture of two airfields and a Japanese military base on the western end of the island. Far more formidable than the gritty Japanese resistance was the island itself, and the Marines experienced a type of jungle warfare that made Guadalcanal look like a city park. A near-continuous downpour perpetually kept men miserable, wet and rotting and turned the island into a pile of loose mud that sucked boots off feet and rendered motorized vehicles virtually useless. Dysentery and fever ran wild, and matters hardly improved when the First Marines moved on to Pavuvu, another Japanese-held objective in the Russell Islands. Although the First Marines were at the beginning of a long passage through a hellish warscape, many of them later described New Britain as the lowest point of the war.

Episode Four, though not without strong moments, epitomizes the flaws of The Pacific. Despite the viewer having virtually no backstory on Private Robert Leckie, he and his squad remain the primary focus of the narrative. Alternate sources indicate that Leckie is a rich character, and James Badge Dale does excellent work with the material provided to him in bringing Leckie to life on-screen. Beyond his writing ambitions and hints about his chilly upbringing, we know little about Leckie from the storyline, but Dale’s portrayal successfully shows a man by turns both heroically courageous and overwhelmed by his sensitivity to the violence and dehumanization around him. Dale makes the most of his chances to shine in Episode Four, including a crackling confrontation with his commanding officer over some Japanese contraband, a riveting sequence in which he witnesses a fellow Marine’s gunshot suicide, and a series of interactions with a military psychiatrist after Leckie is evacuated to a hospital for stress-related fatigue.

In the absence of a larger context, however, Leckie might as well be in Vietnam. The relationship between the particular characters in The Pacific and the momentous events they rode and helped shape remains frustratingly vague. Although the opening narration provides the location of the action, the significance of these particular battles of men’s guns and humanity’s conflicting will is lost among the ponderous opening sequences and the occasional narrative non-sequitur.

The gaping lack in The Pacific seems almost deliberately emphasized by a bewildering plotting decision only a few minutes into Episode Four. Early in the episode, viewers finally get another tantalizing glimpse of Eugene Sledge (Joseph Mazzello), the Marine private initially denied the ability to enlist over a heart murmur. Mazzello is a winning, charismatic actor, and Episode Four dedicates all of three minutes showing him in a training drill at Camp Elliott in the United States before returning to New Britain, after which … we don’t see Sledge again in this episode. The spastic inclusion of a single scene showing Sledge’s whereabouts is simply a terrible choice on the part of the series’ creators. Not only does it raise the question of “Why the hell is this one scene in this episode?”, it also emphasizes the over-reliance on a single narrative thread in what is supposed to be a look at the war through the eyes of an ensemble cast.

Private Sledge is lucky to be included, however. Left out of Episode Four completely — barely even mentioned, despite being a primary character — is Sergeant John Basilone (Jon Seda). Basilone, already more of a concept than a character because of weak plotting, doesn’t appear at all in Episode Four, which prompted me to ask the television, “Who’s directing these episodes, Stevie Wonder?” (Thanks, McClane!) As a result, Episode Four consists almost entirely of Leckie’s journey from his unit’s battle with the cruel elements of South Pacific warfare to Leckie’s personal struggle with combat stress and fatigue, ultimately landing him in a psychiatric unit after he begins wetting himself in his sleep. Dale does an admirable job as the de facto leading man of the series, and if nothing else, The Pacific is turning into quite a résumé for Dale’s acting career.

The problem is, The Pacific so far is pretty much that “nothing else.” The scenes are beautifully shot; the actors all deliver on the material provided; the subject matter could hardly be more grave. Yet the cinematography and acting are window-dressing on a smoky, cracked pane of glass revealing little about the meaning of the events taking place on the other side. The character development is fitful at best; the plot gives the appearance of a by-the-numbers Wikipedia article; and the Japanese soldiers, among the most fascinating subjects in military history, remain an elusive night-time phantom, courageous in the face of certain death (and impressive to the Marines, as noted in our recap of Episode One), but without any grounding to tell us why they behave that way.

A great story can take time to develop, and HBO’s history is littered with top-notch dramas that doled out the greater context of the story in painstaking bits and pieces, from “The Wire” to “The Sopranos” to the elder sibling of The Pacific, Band of Brothers. To succeed with this strategy, however, a narrative must deliver an intriguing reason for its own existence early in the proceedings, typically in the form of a compelling, character-driven plotline; otherwise, the viewer has little incentive to invest the upfront time for the potential dramatic payoff later. Four episodes in, The Pacific is in danger of collapsing on its own penurious paucity of these elements.

HBO’s The Pacific airs Sunday nights at 9:00 p.m. Eastern.

Ted Boynton is a dedicated sot who holds down a job and a wife, three hours each per day, whether they need it or not. Readers may scold, hector, admonish or taunt Ted by e-mailing him at thecarygrantrules@hotmail.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 04/07/10 | Field of Dreams Review | Maybe This Is Heaven









Comments

I'm confused...what happened to Ted?

It has him listed at the bottom but Dustin at the top.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at April 7, 2010 2:04 PM

While I agree with the "lack of bigger picture" criticism, I liked this episode far better than the previous three. For the first time, I felt that I actually cared about a character. Leckie is finally starting to come together as a human being and not just a composite of the obligatory sensitive writer who can also manage a gun when duty calls. The scenes in which it slowly dawns on him that his problem is psychological, not physical and when he glimpses his future (Gibbs???) if he doesn't start to pull it together were really well done.
I have to wonder if some of the flaws in the series come from trying to show things only from the perspective of the marines: they didn't know much beyond the fact that they were shuttled from island to island and ordered to kill Japanese soldiers, so that's what we're shown.

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 7, 2010 2:42 PM

Yeah, I've gotta say that I'm liking the series less and less with each passing episode, pretty much the exact opposite reaction that I had to Band of Brothers.

Pity, I *really* wanted to love this series.

Posted by: Soylent Green is Sheeple at April 7, 2010 2:54 PM

I have to wonder if some of the flaws in the series come from trying to show things only from the perspective of the marines: they didn't know much beyond the fact that they were shuttled from island to island and ordered to kill Japanese soldiers, so that's what we're shown.

Possibly, but I'm not exactly sure how you work that into the narrative without it coming off as a cliche of "this-is-where-the-soldier-finds-out-the-enemy-is-human" scene.

The fact is, most Marines never *had* that moment during the war, indeed, a lot of them barely reached that point *after* the war and I don't think the series has done a very good job of grounding the viewer in a) just how vicious and brutal the ground combat was in the Pacific and how deep the level of hostility ran between the Marines and their enemy.

It's true that the Marines respected the Japanese as fighters, but it was a respect that was heavily tinged with loathing that fed back into the hatred that most Marines really felt for them. The Marines may have respected that the Japanese fought hard under horrible conditions, but they hated that they would fight to the death, hated that they routinely fired on corpsmen and stretcher bearers, hated that they would feign surrender to lure Marines into range for hidden grenades and booby traps. Given that popular culture already had predisposed the Marines to think of the Japanese as animals and less than human, the way they fought cemented their status and drove the fighting to vicious new depths.

Posted by: Soylent Green is Sheeple at April 7, 2010 3:17 PM

I don't think the series has done a very good job of grounding the viewer in a) just how vicious and brutal the ground combat was in the Pacific and how deep the level of hostility ran between the Marines and their enemy.

I will completely agree with you here. At the very beginning of this episode they said it was one of the most horrendous engagements for the Marines and yet we barely see any "engaging." What we are left with is an entire episode of rain. Kind of like in Forrest Gump when he has the little rant on the rain in Vietnam.

Just getting shots of terrible looking soldiers isn't helping us adhere to the characters. We are not having to suffer with them, like a holocaust film for example.

As I was watching this episode I also thought about something else. In BoB we didn't really see the "fun" side of the soldiers until the end of the series. Yet here we saw them celebrating in the 3rd episode. We are not being allowed to grow with them. Instead of living the war with them we are being given brief glimpses and playing a game of follow the leader.

Maybe they shouldn't have gone with a full dynamic like Bob and simply followed one or two soldiers through one engagement. 10 episodes of one battle might seem like a bit much but we would also be much more grounded and allowed to share what the characters experience.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at April 7, 2010 3:39 PM

Capitalization, DeistBrawler, please!!

I just spent five minutes wondering who Bob is!

I've been wondering when the "Jap-hate" might show up. To date there have only been night battles, but one assumes when they start to come upon villages of massacred people, there will be some racist commentary from the Marines: it's odd that there was none of that in Ep 1 when they passed the mutilated bodies of (I think) other Marines . If that doesn't happen, then they have absolutely sanitized what really happened (on both sides). I was recently watching a documentary on WWII and one of the surviving soldiers said it was a great relief to be posted to the Pacific because it was so easy to get ones head around the concept of killing "Nips" (his word, not mine) rather than Germans who were just like the people in the US (I think a lot of people forget how dominant German-descendant population was in much of the US in the 1940s).

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 7, 2010 3:52 PM

Maybe they shouldn't have gone with a full dynamic like Bob and simply followed one or two soldiers through one engagement. 10 episodes of one battle might seem like a bit much but we would also be much more grounded and allowed to share what the characters experience.

I think I would have just stuck to Sledge's story. Make the 1st episode or so him in college, hearing about the early battles, seeing the newsreels, reading the magazines and papers and reading his buddy's letters to him, all the while desperately wanting to be able to enlist and join the fight.

It would give a much better grounding and overview of the social and culture circumstances that many Marines went to war under as well as introducing a singular focal point around which the series would revolve.

Make the 2nd episode about training and then shipping out to join the 5th Marines at Pavuvu, being thrown into a veteran unit as a replacement, meeting his squad mates and wanting to be like them, scared of being under fire for the 1st time, hearing tales of the Japanese and how they fought ... then being shipped off to fight somewhere unknown, debarking into LVTs towards the inferno that was Peleliu.

Spend 3ish episodes on Peleliu, 1 episode back on Pavuvu and then 3ish more on Okinawa. If you want points for interesting, you could finish the series with another episode with Sledge in China and then being sent home and trying to deal with that reality.

10-11 episodes with a single character through line that walks you through 2 of the worst battles the Marines had to fight in enough depth to really realize the physical, mental, emotion and psychological toll it took on the men who fought in those engagements.

Thus far, the series has just felt too diffuse, we don't stick to one guy, or even one unit. The single scene with Sledge in this episode is like that, it's a plot place marker to remind you, "hey, there's stuff happening with *this* guy, it's not enough to really pay any time or attention to it and it doesn't really matter, but don't forget about him, ok?"

Posted by: Soylent Green is Sheeple at April 7, 2010 4:06 PM

I am a Band of Brothers fan par excellence.

But it was with trepidation I finally watched the first episode of The Pacific this week.

I deleted the rest of the episodes when I was done.

To be kind, lightning didn't strike twice. Only makes me appreciate the original even more.

Posted by: icecreammang at April 7, 2010 6:52 PM

I dug this episode. I liked that it focused on one character and showed a complete campaign through his eyes.
It also developed him very substantially as a character. I cared about this guy after last episode and I care about him even more after this episode. I think that showing the mud and the rain and the misery of New Britain sets the stage for the replacement Sledge and his baptism on Peleliu. Jumping around from character to character in this episode I think would have lessened the message of just how miserable it is to live in a rain soaked jungle for four months straight.
Also, just from my view, the scene where Leckie was checking out the nurse almost made me cry . . . I am a sucker.

Posted by: williamx at April 10, 2010 3:22 AM

I also have been very disappointed with The Pacific. I too feel that the whole thing is extremely scattered. I think part of the problem is with the source material itself--instead of using one text compiled by speaking to a number of sources who all went through the same experience together (the book Band of Brothers) they are trying to cobble together a series based on three sources (books by Leckie, Basilone, and Sledge) who were in completely different places experiencing completely different things. If they had concentrated their efforts on one book or the exploits of just one company, they might have been better off. In addition, it seems that the history itself lacks a narrative line--in the European theater, the troops were fighting across Eurpe and proceeding toward a goal: Berlin. It seems in the Pacific theater there was a lot of "Hop off the boat and fight the enemy here in this random miserable mudpit until we come and get you" which doesn't lend as well to narrative structure.

Someone earlier mentioned the odd lack of conversation about the Japanese from the Marines--I suspect that the writers and producers weren't necessarily sure how handle the ugly racial overtones from a group who are supposed to be the heroes, so they've decided to pretty up the history and leave that out.

I don't know--there are definitely things I like, and this past episode was particularly good in my opinion...perhaps because they did mostly settle down and tell Leckie's story. I feel like he is the dominant character--Basilone feels more like a caricature of the "brave heroic soldier" so far, and Sledge has been a non-entity. I guess the main feeling I have is that I wish they would let us settle down and follow Leckie...I like the characters in his group and wish I could get to know them better.

Posted by: Siege at April 12, 2010 3:53 PM