web
counter
 

The Emasculation of Dog Ownership

By Michael Murray | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (31)



4626.jpg

Three years ago my girlfriend and I went out and got a puppy, a Miniature Dachshund named Heidi. I was new to being a dog owner, and one of the things that I’ve learned through this experience is that if my abilities to raise a dog are any indication of what my actual parenting skills might be, then I should never have children.

Over the course of the last three years I’ve essentially created the canine equivalent of a bratty teen that’s utterly embarrassed and ashamed to be seen with me. Whenever another male walks into our apartment, the dog will gravitate to him and sit on his lap, refusing to come to me when I call. The creation of this disloyal and disobedient little monster is entirely my fault, of course. Over-protective and obscenely indulgent, I’m a needy wreck who enables whatever canine desire happens to pop into her limited brain. If she does so much as look at a fly, I will instinctively praise her as a GOOD DOG, and so naturally enough, she sees herself as the leader of the pack.



Of course, it’s both humiliating and emasculating to find myself lower in the pack hierarchy than a Miniature Dachshund named Heidi, but there you have it, and as a result, I often find myself hating our stupid dog.

Actually, that’s not true, I love our little dog.

It’s Cesar Millan I hate.

“The Dog Whisperer,” now it’s 6th season of cultural domination, features Millan— a kind of Mexican Dog God—going into homes in California where he “rehabilitates dogs and trains humans.”

In spite of the unalloyed machismo that informs his professional demeanor, I’ve always found there to be something fussy, almost delicate about him — he looks anal, like a figure skating instructor. With his perfectly configured hair, skin and teeth, he carries with him the appearance of a man who visits a spa at least four times a week, and even from three thousand miles away, you can still catch a whiff of his cologne. Vanity radiates from the man.

But the most striking thing about him is his physical composure. His posture is impeccable, and there’s an economy to his movement that’s really quite striking. He exudes a physical focus and balance that’s practically preternatural, and therein, may reside the secret to his success.


At any rate, on his show, which is equal parts illumination and humiliation for his middle-class audience, he takes our devilish and temperamental animals and transforms them into the peaceful and beloved pets we always thought we deserved.

On a recent episode, we visited a wealthy California neighborhood. The large houses, contained by white picket fences, all had pools in the backyard and well maintained women in yoga pants and pearls taking pure breeds for walks. It was in this environment where we met Cotton, a beautiful Husky, who was causing all sorts of misery for his family.

Sitting in their expansive living room, Caesar listened as the husband and wife explained their canine woes. As the man spoke, the wife, the real owner of the dog, kept interrupting him, making excuses for the dog as if for the child of her previous marriage. She described what she thought motivated the dog to it’s behavior, revealing far more about how she viewed herself, than the dog did, I’m sure, all the while allowing a hard edge of bitterness to creep into her voice that suggests all was not well in paradise. Caesar attempted to maintain a mask of objectivity, but beneath it you could see just the faintest twitch of amusement.

In short order, he headed off to the garage to confront the penned beast. As mystical, vaguely American-Indian music plays, Caesar leaned over the cage, at one with nature. In short and edited order, Caesar had triumphed and was taking the once impossible dog for a happy walk around the block. Creepily, as if a diabolical consummation had just taken place, Caesar said of Cotton, ” he belongs to me.”



He next visited a couple of college-aged women and their two dogs, finding out that the masters had been treating their pets like little children, instead of, well, dogs. Practically rolling his eyes, he demeaned the girls for their “weak energy” and for fulfilling their own needs rather than the dogs. Stepping into the “leadership void” he righted the sinking ship in no time, and when one of the girls, happy, remarked that she wanted to tell her pet that it was a “good dog,” Caesar told her no, and that we should have been saying “good girl” to her, and then he patted her on the head, treating her like, well, a dog.

It’s entertaining enough, I guess. I mean, we all like to see cute dogs on TV, and it’s a kick to look into the homes the privileged and see how their warped lives have fucked-up their relationships with their pets, but still, there seems something cruel, even misanthropic running beneath it all.

There’s no question the Millan has a keen and unique understanding of dogs, and that he’s able to achieve a harmony with them that’s almost spooky. Jesus, I wish that I had his knack, but the truth is that the only way I can achieve a “calm and assertive state” (whatever that actually is) is by knocking back a couple of scotches, and after six seasons, Millan seems bored, even contemptuous of people, and each episode is a monotonous repetition of the preceding one. It no longer feels like he’s trying to help the people who are having trouble with their pets, but is merely relishing the opportunity to point out their weaknesses.

There’s no doubt that many of us in North America pamper our pets. Infantilizing and ascribing human characteristics to them, we use them as surrogates, seeking from them the love, relevance and approval that we should really be receiving and cultivating in relationships with other people. In our culture of excess, we imagine that spoiling and fussing over our pets is cute, that we’ve rescued them and ushered them into some sort of doggie paradise. It’s a self-serving conceit, and we’re probably just gratifying ourselves and fulfilling our needs rather than the animals, and it’s this all-too-human impulse that Caesar Millan hovers imperiously above, choosing to have more sympathy for the animals he can dominate, than the people he never seems to quite understand.

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. For the last three and a half years he’s written a weekly column for the Ottawa Citizen about watching television. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.









Legend of the Guardians Trailer | Anne Hathaway Career Assessment













Comments

I've enjoyed the few episodes of The Dog Whisperer that I've seen, but after those few episodes "I got it."

Why has this show been on 6 years?

In England they run a show for 6 episodes and then stop. That's the full run. That's all you get. Watch something new. Why can't we do that?

Posted by: BWeaves at March 5, 2010 11:30 AM

a keen and unique understanding of dogs

Yeah. It's called treat the dog like a dog.

It's no surprise his show has nothing but middle to upper class families with pet problems. People who treat dogs like humans and then can't understand that the dog doesn't behave like a human (OK, so some humans will pee on the carpet, but that's only after 6 whiskeys).

Posted by: Fredo at March 5, 2010 11:31 AM

It is so amusing to me that people need "help" in raising their pets/children (ie, Supernanny) so that the pets/children do not become ill-behaved monsters.

I'm pretty sure I'm full up with contempt for these people already, so I probably shouldn't ever watch this dog show, and I only watch "Supernanny" occasionally, where there is nothing else better to watch, not even paint drying.

Posted by: Slash at March 5, 2010 11:37 AM

TSST!

Posted by: superasente at March 5, 2010 11:52 AM

TSSST!

Posted by: henchman for hire at March 5, 2010 11:55 AM

Damn you, superasente.

This ain't over.

Posted by: henchman for hire at March 5, 2010 11:56 AM

Michael, man, I feel for you. We have a miniature dachshund too, and that little brat is as spoiled as can be. She's always barking, always bossy, always trying to steal food. My wife refuses to train her, because she's her little princess. We got her while my wife was pregnant with our first child so she'd have someone to "practice taking care of."

And I wonder why my daughter is a spoiled brat as well?

Here's my wife and her pretty little princess.

Posted by: Snath at March 5, 2010 12:10 PM

You should really read the article on him in...well, it was some recent women's mag. Honestly, there's a lot more to him than people realize, as far as his growing up extremely poor, being made fun of and ostracized, finding he related much better to dogs because people could stab you in the back and make fun of you to your face, but dogs were just dogs -- much easier and safer to befriend.
That was one long run-on sentence! Anyway, he has trouble relating to people, he admits that in the magazine, to the point where he and his wife's marriage nearly fell apart because he could barely connect with her or their infant child. His lack of empathy for the humans in each episode isn't intentional, I think it's just his natural state to be more in-tune with the animals -- he can't relate to people so well.
Just my two cents! He's actually a pretty interesting person.

Posted by: cassiepants at March 5, 2010 12:17 PM

Wow,I was not expecting the Cesaer hate. Sure he is a fussy little celebrity. Sure he is a little contemptuous of some of the people on his show. But he has genuine compassion for many people stuck in situations where they are trying to do the best for their animals and just lack the training. There is an episode where this huge Great Dane has developed a fear of shiny floors and lioleum floors because he slipped once as a puppy and was seriously injured. Ceaser did the pack leader thing and got him to trust him and helped him overcome his fear. He has had a couple episodes dealing with individuals overcoming anxiety issues, serious grief and a family with an autistic child whose behavior was seriously freaking their dog out.

He has also done more to repair the reputation of Pitt Bulls than anyone. They are no more dangerous than German Shepards or any other similar sized breed.

One of my dogs was seriously abused by his previous owners before finally being surrendered to the ASPCA. He is thirteen now and I have had him for nearly ten years. When I first brought him home, he used to have these terrifying nightmares where he would shake and howl in his sleep. He also used to suck on his back feet to the extent that he created bald patches. I took him to several trainers and finally put him on anti-anxiety meds for those behaviors. In time he got better, but he was still terrified of high pitch beeping noises. The vet's theory was that they used a shock collar on him for fun and it would emit a high pitch beep before it shocked him, so anything that sounds like that used to send him into a panic. I caught a few episodes of the first season of Ceaser and tried out some of his techniques. It took a little while but I can now use kitchen appliances without him even waking up from one of his many naps.

Posted by: Jennifer at March 5, 2010 12:30 PM

I agree, cassiepants. If Cesar Milan is making fun of pet owners, it's because they deserve it. I love the looks he gives people when they tell him they can't sleep in their own bed, or that the dog won't let the wife sleep with the husband. What the frak? It's a dog. If you're stupid enough to let the pet run your life, you deserve the condescending looks Cesar gives you.

At least read about the guy - he's self taught and learned his methods by observing wild dogs around his grandfather's farm. And I don't mind that he cleaned himself up (whitest teeth on television!), for as poor as he grew up, I'm not going to begrudge him a few luxuries.

Posted by: Cindy at March 5, 2010 12:35 PM

My family has a lot of mini-dachshunds, and if you get them some training, they are actually good dogs. If you spoil them, they are the worst brats imaginable.

Posted by: Drake at March 5, 2010 12:36 PM

No offense, but that is a terrifying sentence. All that barking! Thank you no.

Posted by: Skewicide Blonde at March 5, 2010 12:43 PM

I'm certainly not a dog trainer, so I can't attest to how safe/humane some of his methods for overcoming aversion are. I'll say that up front, and openly admit that the stuff below is opinion.

Cesar came up in the 'sick-day TV' thread the other day as well. I said it there, and I'll say it again; anybody willing to tell people that they need to exercise their dogs is doing good work. Good work for the dogs, because it keeps them happy, and good work for many of the people on the show, who could use the exercise. I recently cared for a dog that had quite a few neuroses, and when he was walking 2 hours+ a day with me (rather than 45 minutes a day with his owners) you could see a vast improvement in his nervousness.

The episodes where he advises people to not buy/adopt dogs based on pity or "oh look at the cute puppy!" are full of really solid advice. He stresses that people need to objectively evaluate temperament and energy level of the dog, and that's a good thing too.

Posted by: Jacqueline at March 5, 2010 12:44 PM

I do not take issues with Cesar's contempt for his clients. I take issue with the fact that his methods have been found to be ineffective, and to actually do more harm than good in the long-term. I also take issue with the fact that he employs choke collars and various other "training" measures that the ASPCA actually claim constitute animal abuse.

“This study [completed by the School of Veterinary Medicine at Penn and published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science] highlights the risk of dominance-based training, which has been made popular by TV, books and punishment-based training advocates,”Herron said. “These techniques are fear-eliciting and may lead to owner-directed aggression.”

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090217141540.htm

http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/current/research/030509.html

Here are some excellent video resources on alternative training methods and why they are more effective than Cesar Millan's dominance based "training":

http://www.drsophiayin.com/dominance.php

Posted by: hazel dean at March 5, 2010 12:48 PM

Like BWeaves said above, I watched and enjoyed a couple of episodes before I got really bored by the whole thing. I got it. And actually, I used his tips on walking dogs when walking out my bratty mutt, and after a lot of work it became much easier and much more fun to do. So, I don't know. Maybe some of his methods are wrong or bad, and I wouldn't like to try them on some seriously crazy dog, but I think you can get some tips here and there that might be useful for small problems your dog might have.

Posted by: figgy at March 5, 2010 12:52 PM

As someone who has met, and been fawned over by, Michael's dog numerous times, I can attest to his hilariously emasculating situation. There is an absolutely captivating master/slave dynamic at play there where you're never really sure where the power truly lies.

And I can also agree to a number of the ideas in both the piece and the commentary below. Millan has got his schtick down pat at this point, and as someone who also could only ever watch a couple episodes of the show, I've got to say that watching it feels like watching House, but with far less of the amazing Hugh Laurie.

Like watching House and shouting "House is always right!", every episode of this show can be summarized by shouting "It's the owners, stupid!", so much so that I'm continually amazed that people submit to being profiled. There is never, ever, any doubt as to who is at fault.

Do the owners profiled, especially now into the sixth year of the show, really believe that they'll be the first ever owners not to be at fault for screwing up their dog? Do these people, who are at least cognizant enough of their situation to realize there's a problem, not stop to look at how they might be influencing the dog?

My mom loves Millan, but she's as terrible with her dog as most of these people. She shrieks at it, even with positive commands, and is sharp, tense, panicked and frantic when dealing with the dog, yet always questions when the dog acts out when under her supervision. Yet when my dad, or I when I'm home visiting, have the dog, we're calm, measured, and in charge - as all smart dog owners know you must be, and as she sees reinforced and repeated every time she watches this show (which is frequent) - and the dog is fine. Exuberant, but she knows who's boss.

Bizarre the blinders on behaviour when we're dealing with our pets.

Oh, and Michael: say hello to Heidi for me.

Posted by: Liam at March 5, 2010 1:07 PM

You know the thing about his methods? They work as far as people are concerned. Most dogs will learn quite well based on punishments. Some will turn into quivering wrecks and some will turn into biting monsters, but most will get "better" from their owner's perspective. He's not "whispering" and it's not rocket science and it sure as shit ain't new.

But damn, there's so many better ways train/do behavior mod that won't make things worse. Many of Milan's methods are sink or swim, so most dogs swim. But do you really want to risk YOUR dog being the sinker?

You need three things to be a good, compassionate dog trainer: common sense, patience, and the ability to see the dog's point of view. I've been training and teaching people to train their dogs for almost 20 years now, and it's remarkable to me how many people lack the ability to put those three qualities together at the same time.

Posted by: Wednesday at March 5, 2010 1:25 PM

I really enjoyed hearing that sultry smoke & whiskey voice you've got going Michael. Nice!

Posted by: replica at March 5, 2010 1:47 PM

No mention of Milan, pro or con, can go by without remarking on one of the most brilliantly funny Southpark episodes in recent memory, "Tsst":

http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/1007

Posted by: frobme at March 5, 2010 2:05 PM

I've always been able to raise wonderfully well-behaved pets, but that's no indication of parenting skills, cause I suck at that; just ask Smith, Jr and Miss Smith.

Maybe I should call SuperNanny 911.

Posted by: Mrs Smith at March 5, 2010 2:52 PM

@ frobme

Yes and yes. The only reason 'Dog Whisperer' needs to be around (at any time) was so that they could spin it up on South Park. I hate that show (a lot), but that episode was great.

Posted by: NY not NYC at March 5, 2010 3:46 PM

It's interesting to me that The Horse Whisperer is so not about being alpha and domination, compared to the doggy-version of speaking softly. I'm pretty sure that softly whispering: "blood, blood, blood, kill, hurt, blood" has not much calming effect.


... and that he’s able to achieve a harmony with them that’s almost spooky.

The trainer of service dogs and their trainers I mentioned in the other thread has the most amazing connection with any dog in the area. People, too. She's scary.


But the most striking thing about him is his physical composure.

I think this is a big part of it with dogs. They are incredibly attuned to non-verbal cues. As humans with the words (and the interwebs - yay!), we spew our actual agitation of the moment our in posture and gesture all the time.

Maybe everybody should have a dog as an auditor, and anyone who ends up with a spoiled, neurotic little purse-payload ought to be neutered just so they can't mess up a bunch of proto-humans the same way. Seriously. Should we be neutering dogs & cats because there are too many & / or can't take care of themselves, or maybe the problem is somewhere up the "dominance" chain and it should be the twisted sheeples?

Just putting that out there.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at March 5, 2010 3:55 PM

My "test" for bad dog owners (and out of control dogs):
1. Does the dog wear clothes? Unless the dog is a Mexican hairless and you live in Minnesota, no dog needs to wear a dress/sweater/hoodie/@#$% bikinis.
2. Does the said owner carry the dog around (by the arm, in a purse, or pushed in a dog carriage)? Dogs need to sniff (and sometimes roll on) things--it's part of doggyhood. Getting sprayed by a skunk is occupational hazard for dogs.

Posted by: True_Blue at March 5, 2010 3:58 PM

I've only seen a few episodes of Dog Whisperer so I don't know how bad his training methods are. That said, I can't hate on someone who insists on dog owners walking their dogs everyday. My dog is so happy on walks, and when I skip a day he's just that much happier when I finally do take him out. Don't begrudge your dogs some outdoors time, people.

Posted by: Turtle at March 5, 2010 6:36 PM

Dude, frobme, I love that ep. It's hilarious!!!

And I don't care what none of y'all say, I love "The Dog Whisperer". I enjoy watching him "train people." Wish I could train my dad to put the toilet seat down.

Posted by: Jelinas at March 5, 2010 6:41 PM

I adopted a pair of dogs in the last year: one from an animal hoarding situation, one from a three year stint in a wire kennel knee-deep in crap. Millan's methods are working beautifully on both.

I think the key is consistent, patient, control. And I've dropped another ten pounds with all the walking, so for that alone he gets my vote!

Posted by: funtime42 at March 5, 2010 8:13 PM

hazel dean, want to come live with me and my seven rescue dogs? You seem to know your shit as well as I do!

I AM a dog trainer, and every single day, I see the detriment that this man has done to the dogs of America. It's not even Cesar himself, but the fucking idiots that watch his show and think they have a clue about what they are doing. I get students every day that if their dog is not wanting to sit, they PUSH the dog down into a sit, because obviously their dog is defying them. Then I have to jump all over their asses and tell them why that is so wrong. First of all, you are not giving your dog the opportunity to think for himself. Secondly, what if the dog isn't sitting because it is uncomfortable? Many dogs develop hip or knee problems as they age. Would you want to shove your dog down into a sit when they are in pain? Thirdly, sometimes dogs don't sit because they aren't sure what they are being asked, which points to improper training.

Dominance training is a slippery slope to animal abuse. I had a customer this weekend, thankfully not in my class, that every time his 15 week old, 3 pound malti-poo puppy barked, he popped the leash and collar so hard, the dog almost came off the ground. The puppy was barking because he wanted attention, and he wanted me to play with him. He was rewarded with abuse. How long until this dog learns that every time he looks at a person he gets abused? How long until he learns to hate people? How long until this dog gets put to sleep, all because his owner was a fucking idiot who watched Cesar Milan?

Posted by: Commander Strikeher at March 5, 2010 11:37 PM

I can't see a thing in your discipline video, but this all doesn't really apply to me anyway, since Mrs. , doesn't allow any four-legged creatures in the house (and, of course, I am deputized to take out any creatures with more than four legs, such as eight, or 1000).

Also, "Dog God" is a palindrome.

So is "Godtopus, 'sup, 'ot dog?"

Posted by: , at March 6, 2010 11:43 AM

I have been a dog trainer with Petco (where the pets go!) for the past two years and this guy is very good at what he does. And he's right: it's the people who need to learn to read the dog.

Every situation with every dog is absolutely 100-percent different. The show is a great way to see very specific situations, but, naturally, if you have problems, it's best to consult a trainer or behavioralist.

I've yet to see any dangerous or abusive behavior on his show. He genuinely loves dogs and as a fellow trainer, I can recognize his skills as a "surrogate" pack leader.

Posted by: Kristin at March 7, 2010 12:48 AM

[i]It's interesting to me that The Horse Whisperer is so not about being alpha and domination, compared to the doggy-version[/i]

Do you have any experiance training or working around horses to back that up? Because with a horse, if it doesn't think you are the dominant one, then you will have NO control. Good luck getting a 1000+ pound animal to do what you want if they don't think you are the leader. Yes the styles of 'whispering' are different. That is because you are dealing with a prey animal. Their 'flight instinct' is highly developed.

Thing is that if you start a physical confrontation with a horse--where they aren't backing down--you will lose. You can't lay or sit them down as Ceasar does with dogs because that isn't natural to them. What a dominant horse does to a member of the herd that isn't acting properly is to drive them out of the herd... basicaly the horse version of Cesar's blocking/claiming territory. This isolation is scary for a prey animal. It makes them a target.

And I suppose you can use ropes to pull a horse off their feet, but that is terrifying for a prey animal, not to mention that you can break limbs that way if the animal truely panics. As far as their instincts tell them, it means they are going to die. Not so for a dog. Watch puppies playing, they pin each other all the time; and so will their mother when she wants them to quit.

If you watch the Dog Whisp ep with Parelli you can actually see some of what I mean. When he is moving towards Cupcake's (the horse) hind end, she moves it over, pivoting away from him. If she refused to move or moved towards him (as she did to the side-walkers, trying to kick them) then he would have used his 'carrot sick' to make her give ground. Once she did what he wanted then he moved away as a 'reward'. That is no different to what Cesar does when he moves into a dog's space and only backs off after they relax.

Posted by: Shine at January 12, 2011 11:55 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time