blogspot
visitor
Televised Golf Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

r2881413072.jpg
Just Because the Pants are Less Ugly Don't Mean it Ain't Still Boring


Pajiba's Trash TV: A Review of Televised Golf / Michael Murray

TV Reviews | July 31, 2009 | Comments (59)


Men, when they’re involved with golf, are deadly boring creatures.

I can hardly express just how tedious I find listening to some guy launch into a story about his most recent game. Entirely self-absorbed, and without an ounce of interest in the person he’s speaking to, he’ll give an intricately detailed account of how he saved par on the 12th. “And then from the sand, I hit this sweet wedge that trickled right in the cup! It was like it was drawn in by a magnet! Just awesome!”

He, of course, imagines the story a glittering wonder, but the truth is that it’s non-transferable. The ecstasies and furies that accompany golf are purely internal, even obsessive, and to listen to somebody enthuse about them is kind like hearing a hobo rattle on about his bottle cap collection. (It should be noted that Justin Timberlake is purported to be writing a book about his golf experiences,)

Golf is fun enough to play, but the homogeneity that pervades the culture is entirely nauseating. Standing in the parking lot of a golf course and looking around, all you will see are middle-aged white men. Accountants, lawyers, cops and doctors, they’re all pulling their clubs out of their SUV’s, overjoyed to be spending the next five hours away from their families and responsibilities.

Wearing baseball hats with the name of some golf company on them, they march about in their spiked shoes, feeling like the privileged warriors they know themselves to be. Sucking on expensive cigars, they say things like, “Get in the hole!” or “You ‘da man!” Seriously, it’s not a tribe I want any affiliation with, and when I’m stuck with a bunch of these guys on an afternoon, I just want to go home, get stoned and watch game shows.

Of course, it’s usually golf that’s on TV, the sport that now sits on the chest of North America like some military industrial complex. Appealing to a masculine fascination with weaponry, golf is always selling mightier drivers, made from crazy, indestructible alloys, or golf balls that can pierce metal. Hell, they even have their own channel from which they continue to market the delusion that a man, equipped with the right tools, can conquer anything.

This weekend, like every weekend in the summer, the PGA will be staging a tournament. In this case, breathlessly covered by CBS, it will be the Buick Open. The sponsor, of course, tells us everything we need to know about who is watching—men who might want to buy a Buick.

And so, on Saturday and Sunday, these men will hunker down in front of the TV. For stretches of four hours at a time, they will watch a pageant of product placement ads dressed up to look like golf. There will be elegant shots of the clubhouse and aerial views of each hole unfolding as if revealed by a divine hand. In hushed and respectful tones, the announcers—at least one with a foreign accent, but never, ever a French accent—will whisper as if bearing witness to a holy event.

Behind a backdrop of heroic music, narratives are spun around the competitors (who are actually a bunch of unremarkable looking men who probably enjoy Michael Bay movies) in an attempt to wrap them in some mythic fabric. Oh, it’s as if they’ve been culled from a distant era of dignity and civility! They don’t trash talk! They reek of class!

However, if we sit down to watch these men do battle, we end up seeing very little. The actual moments of action—the striking of the ball and the subsequent flight of the ball— are few and far between. And of course, once the ball’s been driven into the sky, we can’t even really see it, and are forced to wait, anticipating the appealing plop as it hits the green. We then watch, with child-like fascination, to see where it’s going.

As the continuous action in golf is pretty much non-existent, most broadcasts are heavily layered with commercials. Between these advertising breaks, we’re fed a heavily edited narrative of the sparse action that’s been unfolding at a snail’s pace all afternoon. We rarely see things unfolding in real time, or see things for ourselves, but see what the producers want us to see, and this means the mega-stars around whom they’ve built heroic stories. If you happen to like a relatively obscure golfer, well, you’re out of luck, because they’re only going to show the front-runners, and the golfers who they know are going to sell products.

In general, golf is all about merchandizing. The professional game that the vast recreational audience watches on TV, serves to sell them back an infinite variety of high-tech weaponry that might elevate both their game, and social status. This is unique to golf, and doesn’t happen in, say basketball, football or baseball.

Golf, which drips with cultivated exclusivity, is a game for those who have money and leisure time. (To play 18 holes, you pretty much have to kill six hours of your day.) The people who watch it are by and large, middle-aged white men.

I think that the game appeals to their sense of entitlement, harkening back to a time when all you it took to be successful in America was to be a white guy. In spite of the fact that Tiger Woods—who famously obfuscated his African-American heritage until Oprah rebuked him—is the dominant force on the tour, it’s still a white guy’s game. It seems likely that instead of inspiring legions of African-American kids to buy Ping golf clubs and join the country club, Woods dominance has just made square white guys feel kind of cool about themselves—like their hobby now has “cred,” man.

As each PGA tournament comes to it’s conclusion, we see the winner stride down the fairway to victory. The sun is setting and triumphant music plays, as our victor walks with such rectitude and stoicism that he appears to be trying to set an example for America’s youth. The gallery— comprised primarily of upper middle class suburbanites not unlike the winner—applaud, as if welcoming home a their single-combat hero, the champion of all that they believe America should be.

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. For the last three and a half years he’s written a weekly column for the Ottawa Citizen about watching television. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.


The Hurt Locker Review | Dogma Review





Comments

my cousin was a caddy on the pro tour for like 10 years. he told some crazy stories about the partying that goes on. He said Tiger really is a nice guy and Vijay Sing has the personality of a big toe...

Posted by: jotthedot at July 31, 2009 11:31 AM

Tried golf years ago with a boyfriend and my stepdad. The first couple of holes were decent enough because I could drive the ball onto the green in one shot on a par three--men do love their jargon.

By hole 8 the boyfriend was carrying the clubs. By hole 11 I couldn't even bother to get the sticks out of the bag.

Now the hubby wants to take up the "sport" and have me come along. What can I say? He's a middle-aged Latino guy with white male aspirations. If he takes me out to test drive Buicks, we're through.

Posted by: mamasez at July 31, 2009 11:41 AM

One of my favorite movies "Home for the Holidays" has a great bit in it about golf and how it is used in place of meaningful conversation.
"How are you Dad"
"Bogie, par, par, birdie, bogie......"
I love and it perfect sums up golf.
Ahh Leo Fish. There's is a great name.

Posted by: badalamenti at July 31, 2009 11:42 AM

I love reading your work, Mr. Murray.

Golf really is boring to watch. Take away the ball and it would be walking...

Posted by: Trouble at July 31, 2009 11:43 AM

This is unique to golf, and doesn’t happen in, say basketball, football or baseball.

Not necessarily true, though it might be the accessories more than the equipment -- for example, with basketball it's the shoes and the sports drink, at least judging from the nature of the advertising. Mostly the shoes.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at July 31, 2009 11:45 AM

Being a sports junkie, I do my best to separate the competition itself from its plutocratic trappings, all of which I readily stipulate. And having played a good deal of pasture golf in my younger days (ten bucks for the fee, plus ten more for a sixpack of beer in a plastic bag with some ice in it), I can say there's a subset of golfers who aren't exactly fatcats. And it's undeniably fun to hit a ball with a stick and watch it go.

But once I got a little older and got a few invites to some nicer courses, I found the arrogance, blowhardism, and outright racism and sexism inherent in so much golf ""humor"" (yes, so brutally unfunny it deserves two sets of quotation marks) to be more than I could bear, and gave up the game completely.

Posted by: sansho1 at July 31, 2009 11:48 AM

Why televise a game where the ball is soooo small that you can't see it and the athletes don't actually move while playing, so there's no action? AND WHY DO THE TV ANNOUNCERS WHISPER? They can't hear you!

Posted by: BWeaves at July 31, 2009 11:49 AM

there is

Posted by: badalamenti at July 31, 2009 11:53 AM

Ugh. I'd rather watch Happy Gilmore.

Posted by: Marra at July 31, 2009 11:55 AM

Having worked at a course like the one sansho1 described (the local nickname for it was "the rock pile") I can attest to the fun of the sport. Sure, there were the folks who took it a little too seriously, and made me change the t.v. in the clubhouse to the Golf Channel, but the majority of the members were there to get hammered drunk on a Wednesday afternoon and do donuts with the carts in the rough.

Posted by: battgirl at July 31, 2009 12:01 PM

I've never understood the appeal of golf, it has always seemed like nothing but a boring waste of time. While your article does nothing to dispel that impression, it does go a long way towards explaining why some people would be interested in such a thing.

Posted by: Shawn Anderson at July 31, 2009 12:01 PM

Hey Murry, you sound like one of those douches that likes to put down golfers just because you don’t like golf, you are an asshole you hockey loving asshole. Stick a puck up your ass you queen.

Posted by: Guess Who! at July 31, 2009 12:03 PM

BWeaves - I have ALWAYS wondered that... why the hell do they whisper????
They could spice it up by having Fred Willard's character in Best in Show as one of the announcers... I would watch golf if that happened.

Posted by: missh at July 31, 2009 12:04 PM

I am terrified that I have now agreed with Whookie two days in a row.

most broadcasts are heavily layered with commercials

NFL's TV timeouts are just ironically named, I suppose. And I bet that the NFL's commercials are for Darfur Relief funds or Encyclopedia Britannica or, um, Vassar. No, NFL commercials are for beer and trucks because the people who watch the NFL like beer and the option of throwing shit in their car but leaving it exposed to the elements.

You act like you just discovered that commercials, GASP, are tailored to their audience. And maybe, JUST MAYBE, that audience isn't you. And maybe, MAYBE, snarking at the fact that you aren't a part of that audience makes you seem like an insufferable ponce.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at July 31, 2009 12:39 PM

@ALL

They're sitting in towers right above the green. Yes, the players can hear them. That's why they whisper.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at July 31, 2009 12:43 PM

It doesn't trouble me in the least that advertisers target their audiences with products they think they might buy. This happens everywhere. What I think makes golf unique is that the products that the advertisers sell are actually the instruments of the game--that's how pervasive and moneyed the market they are catering to is. If you watch a Baseball game, you never see ads for gloves, or a football game, ads for helmets. No, you see lifestyle ad. With golf, golf is the lifestyle. Or something like that.

Posted by: michael murray at July 31, 2009 12:54 PM

Considering my grandpa played on the PGA in the '50s and my dad grew up on a golf course, I ended up watching a lot of golf on TV when growing up.

Oddly fascinating to watch (when nothing else is on) but I'm pretty sure the interest in golf skips every second generation in my family.

Posted by: Jim at July 31, 2009 12:54 PM

I probably agree with everything your wrote, but I will have to take it on faith because the boredom of golf transcends all things: even reading about how boring the game is is too boring to read.

Posted by: brynn at July 31, 2009 1:13 PM

My great grandmother used to watch golf. Of course she was so blind she couldn't see the tv (but really who needs to for golf?) and she was so deaf that she had to turn the volume all the way up to hear the whispering. Of course this just meant that sometimes when you walked in the house, you were greeted with deafening applause.

Actually, she watched soap operas that way too. So sometimes you walked in and heard a voice screaming about they were sleeping around, not really your father/brother/husband, whatever else soap operas use as 'plots'. It did make for good times.

Posted by: Jeni at July 31, 2009 1:28 PM

Michael Murray,

I see what you're trying to say about the advertising, but you're not entirely correct. Basketball commercials sell shoes, balls and jerseys, pretty much the only instruments aside from the baskets in that game. Football commercials sell balls, jerseys and Under Armour apparel.

Aside from these specifics, the thing you're discounting is the accessibility of golf. It lends itself to advertising the instruments of their game because you can literally grab your clubs and $10 and go play right now. Same for basketball. Wanna play? Grab your Jordans, Cavs #23 jersey and Wilson ball and find a hoop. Baseball and hockey are difficult to organize and lend themselves to bulk buying for leagues. The target audience is much smaller, though you do see ads for bats and whatnot, you just have to look closer.

Other than that, I love golf and agree with almost everything you wrote, you fucking bastard.

Posted by: Kballs at July 31, 2009 1:37 PM

Racing.

Racing commercials, as often as not, are for products that further your love of racing. And the people in the commercials are the same people driving the cars.

Especially true of NASCAR and IRL, but I know it extends to the more "extreme" racing series, too, like motocross and such.

Posted by: ahamos at July 31, 2009 1:44 PM

Long ago I bought an inexpensive set of clubs and basically taught myself to play by hitting our realtively crappy muni course on a regular basis. I enjoy the relaxed pace of the game and the skill involved as a player but fully agree that on TV it is incredibly boring.
A friend picked up passes so that I could attend The 89th PGA Championship at Southern Hills Country Club here in Tulsa a couple of years ago just so I could watch Tiger play. Honestly? It's more fun on TV - what does that tell ya? - and you don't have to deal with the reek of country club assholes who smell like bourbon, cigars, moneyed arrogance and mistress-stank.
I'll stick to the muni, where my fabulous 1994 Chevy Corsica won't get towed out of the lot for being, y'know...unsightly.

Posted by: Spender at July 31, 2009 1:58 PM

Advertisers sell you golf balls and golf clubs during golf coverage because with golf balls and golf clubs, you can go to your local muni and play.

Advertisers during football games do not sell you helmets because they cannot also sell you ten other men to be on your team, nor the 11 men needed for the other side. Golf is a solitary sport. You only need yourself and your equipment.

And whoever said that without the ball golf is just walking, without the stupidity, your comment makes sense. Without the ball, basketball is just running. Without the football, NFL is just sumo wrestling. Without the punching, boxing is just ballet. Without uniformed banal responses, a comment thread wouldn't be a comment thread.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at July 31, 2009 2:21 PM

I don't think golf is physical enough for me. I respect the skill involved and can see why people like it, but I'm more of a tennis kind of gal, ultimately.

Posted by: samantha t at July 31, 2009 2:25 PM

I don't know if you take requests, and I know this has nothing to do with televised golf, which I hate more than life itself, but could you review The Glenn Beck Show?

Posted by: George at July 31, 2009 2:28 PM

Half the dudes at my local links are asian dudes. Of course my local links is a public course, and I suppose country clubs might be the parking lot you were exposed to. Which makes you one of those judgmental hipster's i keep hearing about.

Bottom line: Everything on TV is boring. Turn it off and go live your fucking life, and stop writing op-ed pieces that the choir is obviously going to agree with.

Oh yeah, that's what we do here.
nevermind.

Posted by: psychoticmonkey at July 31, 2009 2:28 PM

Golf stories are as boring as Poker stories, and both get inexplicable amounts of airtime on television.

You need to do a better than mention that "middle-aged white men like it" about 4-5 times to really write an effective critique, though. Once was enough.

Posted by: Matches at July 31, 2009 2:33 PM

Did anyone watch the British Open this year? No? How about the U.S. Open last year? Those were two of the most compelling sporting events televised over the last few years.

Posted by: sosumi at July 31, 2009 2:38 PM

Okay,sosumi, granted that the majors in golf can be very compelling. Watson's near win was one for the ages. I like the Open, The Masters, The PGA Championship and generally watch at least the final round. I also like the FedEx Cup points chase, as it added a little something extra to the proceedings.
That said, I can't sit through the generic PGA events that many of the top golfers simply skip playing.
I'd still rather be hacking up the local muni than sitting at home watching the game.

Posted by: Spender at July 31, 2009 2:48 PM

I agree with JakesAlterEgo. Golf is unlike football and baseball in that you can play on your own, and you can play nine or just hit the range for a little quiet time, as my husband does. I certainly don't find him neglectful or elitist as some of the previous comments have suggested, and rarely is he at the course for six hours at a time. It is a hobby that he puts some time and energy into, but it is far from some strange way to hide from the real, ethnically and economically diverse world. For the record, he doesn't own a Buick either.

This column strikes me as a little pointless. If you already knew that you didn't enjoy televised golf, and if you in fact felt that golf was some sort of horrible classist way for "middle-aged white men" to fortify the boundaries between themselves and the rest of the world, then what exactly is this a review of? Are you trying to convince people that enjoy it of why they shouldn't? Or strike up some sort of solidarity between those who see it as a way to keep the working man down (which seems a little over the top when you consider that for most who partake it's only a hobby)? It seems to be condemning them any way you slice it. I read a lot of Pajiba, but this just struck me as strange.

Posted by: Baby Friday at July 31, 2009 2:54 PM

I see what you're trying to say about the advertising, but you're not entirely correct. Basketball commercials sell shoes, balls and jerseys, pretty much the only instruments aside from the baskets in that game. Football commercials sell balls, jerseys and Under Armour apparel.

As far as the shoes and jerseys (which make up the bulk of the commercials, unlike the balls), they are usually bought for general wear, not just for the game. Hardly anyone who buys Jordans actually expect to play like him; it is more of a status symbol than anything. Jerseys are even more so. And when they are bought as game wear, they are rarely the same. Nobody is going to take their ultra rare, signed-by-player, rookie number jersey and go play 21 or HORSE in it.

Football is the same - unless the consumer is indeed actively playing the sport on a regular basis, there is no reason to invest in top of the line gear except as a status symbol. And neither sport actively promotes the idea that your performance is linked more to your apparel than to your skill. You still have to be halfway good at the sport before you put the stuff on, and no name-brand shoe or shirt will significantly affect your skill after.

But golf commercials are built to convince the viewer that getting these things will not only improve your game, they are essential to the game itself; you can't slack off or use a lesser brand, not if you want to be any good. Or if you are good with them, then think about how outstanding you would be with these shiny babies!

So yeah, I totally get what he is saying. There is a marked difference in the way golf apparel is advertised vs. other sports.

Posted by: Vermillion at July 31, 2009 3:20 PM

vermillion - it's the nature of the game, much like tennis. golf and tennis are both games which require equipment to play (clubs and racquets). it's pretty clear that a better racquet (or, better yet, the correct racquet) can improve your tennis game. same thing for golf and golf clubs.

Posted by: sosumi at July 31, 2009 3:50 PM

Up yours, Vermillion! You suck!!!

Wait. That was another thread.

You're dead on about football, but I will argue the basketball angle. The advertisers do, in fact, want you to think that buying a pair of their shoes will make you play like D-Wade, Lebron, Kobe, etc. The fact that they are status symbols is not explored nearly as much. As for the jerseys, go to any local pick-up game and a good percentage of the players will be wearing one. Of course they won't wear the Magic Johnson '87 Championship replica autographed jersey, but you bet your ass that the Dikembe Mutumbo Denver Nuggest jersey is seeing the court today, baby!

I put more thought into the golf stuff and believe that the mentality of playing golf combined with the wide range of clubs and balls available makes the advertising angles completely appropriate. It is a game of precision that can easily lead to a belief that inferior equipment is the reason you suck, not your ability. And it's exciting to try out new clubs. (I'm way into playing golf right now, if you hadn't noticed.) As for the country clubs, I wouldn't know first hand about those assholes. Public links all the way!

Posted by: Kballs at July 31, 2009 4:03 PM

*WARNING - GOLF TALK*
I'm with you Kballs. My basic sticks are pretty generic but I did upgrade to an Odyssey White Steel 2-Ball putter and a Big Bertha FT-9 Tour Driver because those two aspects of my game were suffering. A good driver won't keep you from hooking or slicing and a better putter won't help you read a green but having a little more control or a little extra power can make a difference in your overall game.
*ALERT - GOLF TALK ENDED*

Posted by: Spender at July 31, 2009 4:29 PM

But Spender, I bet dollars to donuts that the muni guys you play with don't sit around afterwards drinking beer and say "Fuck man, you should have seen the way I read the green on 17. Fucking tight!" No, weekend golfers talk about hitting the ball far, fuck, weekday golfers talk about hitting the ball far, and here's the thing. Golf commercials are accurate. A new driver won't make you better, but it will help you hit a ball farther. Technology changes in golf really do affect a normal player. So those commercials selling the gear saying that they'll give you distance are right.

Which leads me back to my point: this was an incredibly vapid article.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at July 31, 2009 4:42 PM

Which leads me back to my point: this was an incredibly vapid article.

Agreed. This from a former muni guy who is now a middle-aged country club guy. Why? Because I can. It's a better course, it's more convenient, and it's in better shape. Sorry to burst your bubble but a lot of the country clubs nowadays don't give a shit about excluding anyone. In fact most country clubs are dying for members and will take an Eskimo leper so long as she can pay.

My take on televised golf: I can't see anyone being interested if they don't play. However I can appreciate just how much better these pros are than the weekend player so I enjoy the display of skill.

Posted by: ed newman at July 31, 2009 5:11 PM

The reality is that EVERY major sport in America is marketed to and paid for by rich, middle aged dudes OF EVERY COLOR.

That is why all the stadiums, parks and arenas are named after insurance companies and banks. Its why we have all these new facilities with suites and courtside bottle service, etc.

Golf is actually one of the most accesible sports for young people. A child can see a golf tournament for free if under 12 years old. How much will it cost you to take your client to a football, baseball or basketball game?

You want your kid to play golf, get his some clubs at the Play it Again, and take him out on the muni course on the cheap. But you want him to play baseball, Pop Warner, etc and you have to pay league fees, pay for jerseys...

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at July 31, 2009 5:30 PM

Don't try to sell golf as an accessible sport. It's not, it's leadership doesn't want it to be, and it's not going to be. Yes, you can go to golf tournaments for free. But watching golf without playing it is boring. And unlike baseball or basketball, a golf course needs thousands and thousands of clear square feet. Try humping those clubs onto a city bus, and see how much fun that is.

That being said, golf gets a bad rap. It's fun, challenging, doesn't require a bunch of other people to play with, and every course is different. Just because there are a large number of douchebags who play, and take the game and the equipment way too seriously doesn't mean it can't be fun.

Of course the real shame here is why there isn't more televised mini-golf. ESPN used to show the world putt-putt championship, and that rocked.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at July 31, 2009 5:53 PM

Golf isn't as accessible as other sports, I wholeheartedly agree. This is coming from a guy who played for his high school team, whose high school happened to be in the inner city. There aren't many courses near the Robert Taylor Homes.

However, the PGA is huge into charity, donating more than any other sport I believe (it could be more per professional though, don't quote me). The First Tee program is a great thing, as is anything that gives kids the chance to do things they wouldn't normally do.

But that goes against Woooooo Elitism!

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at July 31, 2009 9:12 PM

Wow, really? Golf is boring and most golfers are rich old white men who don't want to spend time with their wives (a.k.a. my target husbands)? Thanks for that unique and enlightening perspective.

Look, I agree with you. I woke up to my old man watching golf one day, and it was so tedious I made him fuck me instead. But this is something we all already knew.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 31, 2009 10:41 PM

I am hoping so hard that someone reads that comment and is grossed out at me having sex with my father.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 31, 2009 10:44 PM

Well, that depends, SaBrina. What's the age difference?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at July 31, 2009 11:09 PM

You all miss the point of televised golf. The boring sameness, the hushed tones ... it's a lullabye, meant to ease men who've spent the morning mowing the lawn or running the kids around to soccer practice into a peaceful and restful two-hour nap on the couch on Saturday and Sunday afternoons.

And when you wake up refreshed, you haven't missed a damn thing.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 1, 2009 12:02 AM

My father subscribes to a couple golf magazines. I, myself, do play golf on the school team. Everything you say is true.

I'd like to think it's because the sport is so tedious. It's very technical, because you're trying to hit a tiny ball at a tiny hole and you have to get it in the hole in a certain number of hits and -arajf;asj;a it's insane. It's not quite 'hit the goddamn ball' or 'aim for that hoop'.

Also, 18 holes? Six hours a day? The female varsity players on my team, with four to a team, can knock out 18 holes in about three hours at about par.

Posted by: Schlegel at August 1, 2009 1:49 AM

Schlegel--

Six hour rounds are not necessarily the result of you sucking, but the group in front of you and the group in front of them and the group in front of them. That and poorly planned out tee times.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at August 1, 2009 2:26 AM

16 years.

Posted by: SaBrina at August 1, 2009 7:17 AM

You know, I actually really enjoy( for the most part) playing golf. I absolutely adore golf carts, and it's nice to be out with friends and strangers alike, even if our conversation tends to be about, well, golf. However, I think I'd rather play it alone than with an army of men from the same neighborhood. I mean, it's not getting away from it all, but is actually burrowing in just a little bit deeper.

When I wrote about the 18 hole golf experience taking 6 hours, I meant to include getting there and back( where I'm from, a course is always 30 minutes-45 minutes away, and a post game beer), and of course, the game which can vary wildly in length depending on who is playing around you.

As far as TV golf goes, anything can be dramatic, if you're invested in the outcome. A lottery drawn can be a thrill, but not much is actually taking place. Watching golf, is a a little bit like flipping through a magazine at a doctor's office, it's what we do before the tension is resolved and we get the important news we've been waiting for.

Posted by: michael murray at August 1, 2009 11:44 AM

"(To play 18 holes, you pretty much have to kill six hours of your day.)" This is why one would get up when the course opens and play it in three hours and be home before the kids wake up or had just finished breakfast.


"In general, golf is all about merchandizing."

Every sport is about this, you sound as pompous as the men of the sport you deplore, and you sound like an asshole.

Baseball has become about where to stick the next rotating board of sponsors. Football is laden with scheduled breaks for the ads you pound on. Gee a college football game takes longer than a pro game because of scoring which brings in more ad time. Basketball has it too, pushing $300 dollars shoes so the next inner-city hopeful can get their guardian to work another job for their shoes. And the "world's" game, soccer, has the ads right on the fucking jerseys you shit. By the way, you nose-thumbing Canadian fuck, your national sport has the ads right on the boards, with scheduled stoppages in play, so they can sell more Moosehead, Molson, or Labatt's. Godtopus! You are a real fucking hypocrite when you do not compare what you’re blasting to the other examples.


So bottom line, is you hate middle-aged white men that drive Buicks, and spend money on expensive...weaponry as you call it. You do not even take into account what it takes to get as good as these players or hell the kid on a high school team. By the time a high school player is done for the season a blind person can read their hand, from healed blisters and calluses.

SO instead of wasting our time, change the channel and go spray paint a clubhouse in the middle of the night. This should help you get the angst out. If not, just go the fuck away.

Posted by: richmac at August 1, 2009 11:49 AM

Heh. Heh.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at August 1, 2009 1:50 PM

I've always hated the way they film golf for TV. Show the guy's swing, then zoom in as closely as possible on the ball while it's in the air. Are the cameramen just trying to show off? Why would we want to see a little white ball against a blue sky? If they left the camera behind the golfer so we could see where the thing's going it'd be much better, or even one camera to watch it go and one to watch it land.

Posted by: James at August 1, 2009 3:14 PM

Who the fuck is this cherry?
(referring to the author)

Posted by: Rykker at August 1, 2009 8:41 PM

In describing televised golf, I think you pretty much summed up the Olympics. Oh, and all other televised sports.

Also; people don't watch the Buick Invitational because they want to drive a Buick. That'd be like saying people go to Fed Ex Field or Petco Park go there because of their love of shipping packages or overpriced trinkets for their pets.

Way to overgeneralize and shit all over a group of people based on your prejudice of a sport.

Honestly, I've been reading Pajiba for a while now and this shitstorm of a post made me comment.

Posted by: NY not NYC at August 1, 2009 10:22 PM

Every sport is about this

If that is true, then why be so defensive when he says it about golf?

I get why folks are riled up by the "middle-aged white men" remark, but why get so upset with this particular part? Especially when you ultimately agree with it?

And really, you aren't doing you argument any favors with all the swearing. It is hasty and reckless, and it distracts from the point.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 1, 2009 10:27 PM

It's not so much as being defensive as it is being anti-kudos. Thi article is tantamount to writing something proclaiming the sky is blue or that Birthers are dumb. The response to this and those hypotheticals is "yes, and?". This is a George article. All anger, no substance.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at August 2, 2009 2:12 AM

A bunch of sound and fury, you might say? Heehee I'm drunk and made a Faulkner joke. Drunk and reading about golf. When did I become a loser?

Posted by: SaBrina at August 2, 2009 3:55 AM

Shakespeare joke. Whatever. They're both dirty plagiarists.

Posted by: SaBrina at August 2, 2009 3:58 AM

I do really enjoy almost everything you write.
The subject matter doesnt matter - I just like the way you think.

Posted by: Dice at August 2, 2009 2:02 PM

SaBrina has clearly won this comment thread.

Posted by: prawntastic at August 2, 2009 2:07 PM

So I'm late on this one, but I'm so mad. WHERE ON EARTH DO YOU PLAY GOLF. Maybe you've never been to a public course? Does that make you just the same as the "accountants, lawyers, cops, and doctors" who apparently are the only people who play golf? I play golf all the flipping time, and maybe it's that I'm a woman actually paying attention to the people around me, but I play with my other female friends. We then walk 18 holes, and encounter other women on the course, as well as young men, old men, young women, and old women of all races. It's the only sport I can think of in which I can play with both my grandparents and my parents, my nieces and nephews, and someday my kids. I agree with the person who wrote above: you buy your kids some Wilson clubs, take them to the public course, and pay $5 for a junior round. Yeah... sounds like you're really hard-hitting on a terribly exclusive sport there, hoss.

Are you bitter becuase you've never made par? You've never had the great chip from the sand that rolls to the hole like a magnet? That sucks for you.

Posted by: J at August 4, 2009 5:06 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.