blogspot
visitor
Televised Baseball | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

a-rod-face-full-of-mitt.jpg
A Baseball Game is Simply a Nervous Breakdown Divided into Nine Innings


Pajiba's Trash TV: "Watching Baseball" / Michael Murray

TV Reviews | September 25, 2009 | Comments (41)


My fantasy baseball team—A Fury of Pigeons—has been eliminated from the playoffs in my Yahoo league. This has nothing to do with my managerial skills, which are sneaky awesome, and everything to do with craphole performances from losers like Chipper Jones and David Ortiz. Although this investment setback will cost me nearly $6,000, the good news is that I can now actually concentrate on watching baseball.

As many of you who actually like the sport know, enjoying real baseball and fantasy baseball at the same time is pretty much impossible. In fantasy baseball— a pursuit that all the all the ladies think is deadly cool, by the way— you end up watching stats, not games, and are invested in the fate of a bunch of scattered individuals, not teams. You become obsessed with results, scarcely caring about the process that produced the results, and this, I think, is completely contrary to an authentic enjoyment of the game. And so, free of my fantasy baseball obligations, I will be happy to sit down in front of a TV and enjoy a game, not having to worry about what Rich Harden’s bad start is doing to my WHIP.

Right now, with just over a week remaining in the regular season, I plan on finding a bar stool upon which to park myself, and gear up to watch the postseaon. A bar is the perfect spot to watch a ball game. Slowly, in no hurry at all, over a couple of beers, you get to drift in and out of conversations with the people sitting around you, using the game as a sort of communicative spine. With the volume on the TV turned off, the various barflies sitting around provide the play by play, which tends to the profane rather than the informative.

One night at my local, an old alcoholic who was about an inch from being homeless, was wandering from customer to customer. Nobody much liked him, as he smelled of stale cigarettes and lemons, and was suspected of stealing tips of the tables. He put his arm around me and pointed up at the TV. ” You see that guy there?” He was pointing at Tommy Lasorda, who at the time was the manager of the Los Angeles Dodgers, ” I roomed with him back in ‘53 when he was pitching for the Montreal Royals. He was a goddamned fart machine! Although you don’t often get such unusual insights on TV, baseball broadcasts are an open invitation to surreal ramblings.

It’s a slow game, baseball.

A very, very slow game.

The moments of actual action, say, when somebody hits the ball, are few and far between, but like the music of Miles Davis, it’s not the notes that count, but the space between the notes. The pauses in the game allow other things to drift in, and over the course of two-and-a-half hours, or however long the game takes, you will have been exposed to all sorts of unanticipated treasures.

When I was younger, if I ever had insomnia, I’d tune in to whatever baseball game I could find on the radio. It seemed random and exotic, something that led me to places I’d never been to like New York, Seattle and San Francisco. Comforted by the adult voices of the broadcasters and the rhythms of the game, I felt safe, a little less lonely, I guess, and I’d relax and eventually fall asleep.

I particularly loved stumbling upon a Yankee game and getting to hear Phil Rizzuto, whose digressions were so accidentally lyrical, that they were eventually distilled into a volume of found poetry.

Here’s one:

My Secret
When I’m driving
To Yankee Stadium and back,
I do it so often.
I don’t remember passing lights.
I don’t remember paying tolls
Coming over the bridge.
Going back over the bridge,

I remember…
August 19, 1992
Oakland at New York
Mike Moore pitching to Mel Hall
Fifth inning, one out, bases empty
Yankees lead 4-1

Of course, I rarely listen to games on the radio now, as there are a billion different cable options to keep me happy, and now if I can’t sleep, I’ll just switch on the TV and watch the live feed from some west coast game.

At night, the illuminated ballparks are visions of pop art. Beautiful and idiomatically American, they’re perfect stages for the unfolding theatre that’s taking place on the field.

By virtue of the fact that there’s actually very little immediate action taking place, the camera, with scholarly attentiveness, seeks out other visual details that inform the game. Cast into high definition, everything in the game slows down. We see the manager pacing in the dugout, the rookie blowing a bubble as he shifts his position at third base. In the distance, the camera zooms in on a pennant flapping in the wind behind the fence, the theme music from Jaws playing on the organ as the pitcher goes into this wind up. The crowd chants.

And when the pitcher releases the ball, we see the stitches rotate as it heads toward the waiting batter. Somehow, a multitude of narratives, all pointing toward the outcome of the game, are all being told at the same time, and it’s always a beautiful and striking piece of storytelling.

During the postseason, Fox, the network that broadcasts the games, has a multitude of camera’s at their disposal, many of which are trained not on the players on the field, but the people in the stands watching the players. In their faces, the stories of the unfolding game are written. We see a woman biting her fist, or a man taking off his ball cap and nervously running his fingers through his hair. We might catch an unguarded glimpse of star player jumping up on the first step of the dugout, checking to see if that hit was fair or foul, forgetting for a moment the stoic professionalism that was conferred upon him by his $20 million a year salary.

The tension and drama that infuses a baseball game is rarely about what’s happening on the field, but rather what’s about to happen, the potential of that moment. Everybody shares in this anticipatory force of hope, and that energy—which sometimes radiates right out of the television set— is what can make watching a baseball game such a simultaneously transportive and connected experience.

On another note, Go, Yankees, Go!

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. For the last three and a half years he’s written a weekly column for the Ottawa Citizen about watching television. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.


End of Poverty Trailer | The Wizard of Oz Review





Comments

oh, man. i was totally with you right up until "go, yankees, go". ptooey!

Posted by: kc at September 25, 2009 11:30 AM

Oh Mr. Murray, have you read The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon it's a freaky little King novel, but it has this great moment where she just sits and listens to the radio for the sounds of the people in the stands. You pretty much captured everything I've loved about baseball since I was a kid.

Exceptin' the effing Yankees. I hate those damn Yankees more than I care to admit. Those jerks make my skin crawl.

Posted by: Kayanne at September 25, 2009 11:41 AM

Wait a minute, you pay $6000 to play fantasy baseball?! Sweet Godtopus, you may need some help my friend!

As far as breaking down the game to individual players I have the same issue with fantasy football. But it has actually made me care enough to regularly watch teams other than the Colts and Broncos.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 25, 2009 11:43 AM

go pirates!

yeah, i said it-and i mean it.

Posted by: gem at September 25, 2009 11:45 AM

Oh football is soooo much more inactive and fitful. There's like ten minutes of actual things happening.

Posted by: Jay at September 25, 2009 11:49 AM

When I'm up working late at night and the wife has gone off to bed, there is nothing better than getting the Dodgers' radio feed and listening to Vin Scully working his magic. I'm not a Dodgers fan, but the guy is everything an announcer should be.

(Something you may not know about, Michael Murray, since you're primarily exposed to the always-loathesome John Sterling and the impossibly pompous Michael Kay. ZING! Go Sox!)

Posted by: bullfrog at September 25, 2009 11:51 AM

Whooooo, go Yanks!

Posted by: Kolby at September 25, 2009 11:58 AM

Baseball is the tits. I love the postseason especially. I...have nothing interesting to say. Love baseball. Baseball good. Going to a Phillies game Monday. Whee.

Posted by: Julie at September 25, 2009 12:00 PM

Oh football is soooo much more inactive and fitful. There's like ten minutes of actual things happening.

Rugby, my friend. Rugby.

Posted by: twig at September 25, 2009 12:03 PM

Rugby, my friend. Rugby.

Hell YEAH, rugby. They don't fucking stop every 4 seconds!

Posted by: Jay at September 25, 2009 12:08 PM

A beautiful ode to a beautiful game. I grew up listening to Jack Buck calling the Cards game on the radio. You don't hear many good radio calls these days, and the situation on TV is even worse. I dread the McCarver/Buck combo every postseason.

Posted by: becky at September 25, 2009 12:17 PM

As a fan of this website (and MLB), I was happily surprised to read this here. Well done and thank you.

Posted by: Jordan at September 25, 2009 12:34 PM

Screw the Yankees. Go Tigers! 2006 redux!

That said, the best thing about post-season baseball is that it means that the NHL is starting up. Now that is the awesome.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at September 25, 2009 12:40 PM

whoooooooooooo Yankees!!

as a current ex-Pat who has to get her MLB and NFL fix via sportillustrated.com, this article has made me more homesick than anything since my friend announced she had just drunk her first Pumpkinhead beer of the season (damn Brits haven't figured out yet that beer+pumkins=heavenly deliciousness)

miss curling up on the sofa on a lazy sun-filled sunday afternoon with my boy, my cat and a beer (in that order) and watching a game.

I subliment with rugby, but somehow, no matter how much I love it, it just ain't the same...

wonderfully written piece

(Go Yanks!)

Posted by: bethy at September 25, 2009 12:51 PM

BETHY! I want your pumpkin beer.

Posted by: Julie at September 25, 2009 1:01 PM

To me watching baseball is like getting raped by, and I quote George: "11 inches of unlubbed cock."

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 25, 2009 1:02 PM

that's the problem Julie, they don't have pumkin beer in England

one of the improvements of New England...

this is the second autumn I have had to go without, and it is not right, just not right I tell you

Posted by: bethy at September 25, 2009 1:16 PM

Jack Buck calling the Cards, Ernie Harwell calling a Tigers game... these are wonderful childhood memories. I've loved baseball my entire life and this article really encapsulates all that is great about "The Great Game".
Sure, football is king, now and I do enjoy watching college and pro ball but, for me, nothing beats September pennant races and October playoff games.
Think back to 2004: Red Sox down 3-0 to the Yankees in the ALCS come storming back to make history and win the Series. No Super Bowl has EVER been as dramatic or exciting.
Great Article, sir but as many of my my fellow Boston fans are prone to say: Yankees SUCK!

Posted by: Spender at September 25, 2009 1:28 PM

Feh. I don't need Fox's cameras to spend the ninth on closeups of almost-weeping tubby white people in the club level so I know when I'm supposed to be tense. That's when I want to see the GAME and the PLAYERS more desperately than any other time. I want to see the closer lap the mound, running his fingers through his hair.

Also, baseball on the radio is a thing of beauty (assuming you have a good announcer).

Posted by: troymccluresf at September 25, 2009 1:32 PM

You know what's funny? For years, I thought I hated baseball, because I had always watched it on teevee. Then, a few years ago, a friend took me to a game (and later that summer, I went to another through my job). I loved it. That first one, that was actually kind of magical. It was at Shea, and there was a thunderstorm. We were pretty much directly across from the open side, and could see the lightning and the blackening sky off in the distance, but we were far enough under the section above us to not get soaked. And watching the whole actual game, as opposed to the closeups on players faces and 27 hours of commercials, was actually both exciting and relaxing. It turns out, I love baseball. But only in the stadium. (Actually, I should try the radio... I remember listening to Phil Rizzuto too, as a kid, on my Donnie and Marie transistor radio. That probably had more to do with Phil than anything else though.)

Football, on the other hand... way better on teevee. The same friend took me to a Jets game one year. You can't see anything in a stadium, and it's freakin' freezing, even with heated chair warmers and coats and blankets wrapped around the coats. And then there's the constant stopping and lags in action. Bleh. No thank you. I'll sit in my comfy chair with a mug of hot cocoa and my Saints lap blanket, thanks.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 25, 2009 1:46 PM

Great Article, sir but as many of my my fellow Boston fans are prone to say: Yankees SUCK!

Posted by: Spender at September 25, 2009 1:28 PM

----------------------------------------------

As a new yorker it is my duty to retort:

There was NO curse you just SUCKED for 86 years.

And you still do.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 25, 2009 1:48 PM

gem, I heart you! We'll be kings of the world in 2012, and it'll be so much sweeter for having suffered through 20 years of losing.

"and over the course of two-and-a-half hours"

Michael, if only baseball games (and especially playoff baseball games) commenced at such light speed. I love baseball, but I cannot watch it on TV anymore. I don't have 4 1/2 hours of my life to give.

This is not just my problem with baseball, but with all televised games. For all the humongous rights fees networks pay, sports is cheap to produce, certainly when compared with sitcoms and dramas. So there are two factors at play:

1. The longer the game goes, the more opportunity to cram commercials into the inaction, and

2. The longer the game goes, the less time the network has to plug with something that's more expensive to produce.

The result is the four-hour baseball and college football game, the 3 1/2-hour NFL game, the three-hour NBA game, and the 2:45 college basketball game. And I have a life to live, and not much of it left to do so.

I'm ancient by Pajiba standards, so this is going to amaze anyone under 40, but there used to be a time when most if not all college and NFL football games came in under three hours, when just about all college basketball games fit in a two-hour window with time at the end for 10 minutes of interviews with the star of the game and the winning coach, when baseball games averaged 2 1/2 hours.

And great pole-vaulting Godtopus, don't even get me started on the Olympics.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 25, 2009 2:00 PM

Well-pitched games still can roll around two hours. The problem is, at the height of the tinystadium/steroid convergence, balls were popping around like kids on a trampoline, and more offense= longer innings.

As a lover of diminuitive Latin shortstops, I'm happy things are levelling off and 3=minus ERAs have returned to being a Cy Young yardstick.

PS....Yankees Stink.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v133/stacydasilva/?action=view¤t=10-04-07_1924.flv

Posted by: Stacy D at September 25, 2009 2:36 PM

They CAN roll by in two hours; my ideal game is 3-0 in 2:10 and plenty of time for beers on the way home, and I had the great pleasure of seeing one like that this year (Zach Duke was the pitcher). It was a thing of beauty.

But that's a rarity anymore. Even a 3-0 game seems like it goes 2:50.

Anyway, my larger point was, there's absolutely no incentive for the networks to try to speed things up at all. I think they'd be perfectly happy if every game lasted eight hours, no matter how comatose the viewers were by the end.

Actually, this already happens. It's all day Saturday and Sunday afternoons, when you can watch something like 12 consecutive hours of football that if you don't have a dog in the fight might as well all be the same game.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 25, 2009 2:49 PM

Oh, BSlim! The only curse in baseball is "The A-Rod Curse" where any team that signs this self-absorbed, selfish twatwaffle is destined to fail in the playoffs. We in Red Sox Nation were delighted when Big George agreed to sign "Mr. May" and have watched with glee as he continues to flame out when it counts.
Yes, I know, it was 86 years but how many World Series titles have the Yankees won lately?

Posted by: Spender at September 25, 2009 3:25 PM

Ah Hell, the Yankees don't need A-Rod in the playoffs, they just need him to help get them there, guys like Sabbathia, Burnett and Rivera will take it from there.

There are few things as magnificent as watching a Bosox/Yanks playoff game.

Posted by: michael murray at September 25, 2009 4:31 PM

As a big sports fan, I only follow baseball because there's nothing else on. Realistically, games are starting to last close to 4 hours. It's beyond absurd.

Posted by: Mick J at September 25, 2009 4:47 PM

As big a baseball fan as I am, I would never dream of sitting down at home and watching an entire baseball game from beginning to end. It's something that I like on in the background( like the radio), something I can return to and watch for 10 minutes, and then head off and walk the dog, write an email, and then watch again for 20 minutes. And of course, I love having a ball game happening on TV if I happen to be in a bar.

There's no doubt that ball games take too long to make it a realistic source of committed entertainment. Baseball is ambient, at it's best when it's the oxygen around you and you only really notice it when you need it, if you know what I mean.

I live in Toronto, and instead of going to the Blue Jays games, which I will only do a couple of times a year ( for all the obvious reasons), I prefer to go to the Maple Leafs semi-pro games at Christie Pits. You just sit on the grass with you dog and Korean barbeque from across the street, kill some time, and then head off whenever you feel like doing something else. It's funny, although you never really have to make a commitment to baseball( it is a background sport), you always remain committed to it.

Posted by: michael murray at September 25, 2009 4:57 PM

There are few things as magnificent as watching a Bosox/Yanks playoff game.

Posted by: michael murray at September 25, 2009 4:31 PM
______________________________________________

Couldn't agree more, Michael. I'm hoping that the Tigers and Angels co-operate with us this year. Yankees-Red Sox playoff games are the best spectacle in sport.

Posted by: Spender at September 25, 2009 5:14 PM

Ah, I loved baseball. Until 2003, which was the year the Cubs ripped my heart out for the last time and I decided to just stop caring. Much. I still care a little.

But I come not to bury the Cubs but to praise baseball on the radio. Ron Santo and Pat Hughes are a joy to listen to and despite ending my love affair with the motherfucking goddamn fucking Cubs (tm), I still love to listen to a Cubs game being called on the radio. This option is infinitely preferable to the many cable tv options largely because you are certain to never have to listen to Tim McCarver.

Posted by: megbon at September 25, 2009 5:24 PM

Agreed... Buck and McCarver just suck the joy out of Fox Saturday Baseball telecasts.
Nothing beats listening to baseball on the radio.
A summer evening, cold beer, cheap jam box tuned to your local am station and listening to play by play/color combos who really paint with words.
In North Texas, I listened to Rangers games on WBAP and thought of Mark Holtz and Eric Nadel like family.
Holtzie's death from leukemia (the year before the Rangers won their first division title, dammit) was as heartbreaking as losing a close relative.

Posted by: Spender at September 25, 2009 5:36 PM

I agree, I prefer baseball on the radio, but not for the postseason--I have to watch that.

And by the way, what the hell happened to the Cubs this year? Honestly, how could they be that bad? I mean, and perish the thought, but is Milton Bradley right?

Posted by: michael murray at September 25, 2009 5:45 PM

Thomas Boswell's classic is a little dated, but it's still Thomas Boswell:

www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/563814/posts

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at September 26, 2009 12:25 AM

Michael Murray: Yes, Milton Bradley is right, and the cubs really are that bad. Go Cards.

Posted by: Austin asking for trouble at September 26, 2009 2:26 AM

I loved this up till the go Yankees. Here's the thing: The Yankees are incredibly polarizing. You either love them or you hate them. Anyone who actually follows baseball has an opinion. You can root for almost any other team, and people won't hate you. They might laugh, but they won't hate. But with the Yankees people are either fans, or they hate the team so much it is amazing they don't punch things when the name gets mentioned (unless it is the fact that they lost, in which case a happy little jig breaks out). You must be careful when you profess love for the Yankees lest you incite a riot.

Posted by: Morgan Lefai at September 26, 2009 6:16 AM

who cares? It's said more and more celebrities have their profiles on a great millionaire dating site____WealthySocial.COM_______ . The best club for seeking the rich singles, sexy beauties and even hot celebs...You should check it out!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by: Coren at September 26, 2009 10:31 AM

I would just like to ask the camera guys and their directors on baseball telecasts: Do you show 843 shots/game of Joe Torre sitting in the dugout looking stoic and doing nothing in the hopes that on the 844th shot you'll catch him with his finger up his nose or falling asleep or flipping the finger to some kid in the front row? Cause really, Joe never does anything. NEVER. DOES. ANYTHING. I don't need you to show me Joe doing nothing. I know what that looks like, and it's never pretty. (What was the line in "Ball Four," about one of the players going out with a woman who was so ugly she was "like Joe Torre with tits"?) LaRussa, OK, he's always checking the lineup card on the wall, looking for an edge, or applauding, or talking with a player. Torre ... sits there, hands in his jacket pockets, no expression. If you put together a montage of all the shots of Torre during a game it would look like Warhol's "Empire," only longer.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 26, 2009 11:18 AM

The only thing that sucks worse than a Yankee's fan is a Red Sox fan. Just because you won the WS twice in a decade after going o-86 doesn't make you the best team ever. 26 world series wins makes you the best team ever.

And if the Cubs ever win the series be prepared for a new Great Chicago fire, because they'll be louder and more obnoxious than a submarine sinking to the bottom of the ocean filled with all of the current Disney Channel stars.

That doesn't make any sense other than to say that the CUBS SUCK.

Followed closely by the Cardinals with 10.

Go Cards.

Posted by: Some Guy at September 26, 2009 12:13 PM

Oh man, you guys should REALLY stick with movies.

Posted by: Frank at September 26, 2009 12:52 PM

People, PLEASE. Rise above your petty differences, and join the ranks of the enlightened (also: Canadians) and learn to embrace hockey!

That is all.

Posted by: lordhelmet at September 26, 2009 5:48 PM

The moments of actual action, say, when somebody hits the ball, are few and far between, but like the music of Miles Davis, it’s not the notes that count, but the space between the notes.

Late to the party, but I simply could not leave without acknowledging one of the most fantastic sentences I've ever read. It might be perfect if not for that extraneous comma at the end. I'm still stealing that simile, though.

Posted by: Che Grovera at October 1, 2009 5:58 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.