free counter with statistics "Star Trek" The Original Series | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

030624_ncc1701_04.jpg
The Original Final Frontier


"Star Trek" The Original Series / Steven Lloyd Wilson

TV Reviews | March 25, 2009 | Comments (43)


War is instinctive. But the instinct can be fought. We’re human beings with the blood of a million savage years on our hands, but we can stop it. We can admit that we’re killers … but that we’re not going to kill today. - Kirk, “A Taste of Armageddon.”

So this little science fiction show goes on the air on CBS. The creator pitches it as a space western, “Wagon train to the stars.” Dedicated fan base, lousy ratings. It gets bounced around to worse and worse time slots before getting yanked off of life support. Funny thing, fans. A fan base surges up from coast to coast, publishing newsletters, holding conventions, dressing up in character. The short lived and unfinished show unexpectedly hit success in syndication. The years pass, and the mounting fan pressure yields a film.

“Firefly”? “Star Trek” was “Firefly” before Joss Whedon realized vampires lived in his closet. And it managed that whole fan thing when computer interweb doohickies were still confined to, well, sci-fi shows.

Then ten more films. And five more television series, amassing over 700 episodes. So J.J. Abrams has more than a little baggage hanging over his shoulder as he finishes the final edits on the reboot of Star Trek. So 40 years on, is the original series worth seeing?

To be blunt: Forty-year-old special effects do not hold up very well. It could be worse. Over the last year, CBS has released all three original seasons in re-mastered versions on DVD, and they did an admirable job of adding subtle touches of CGI to render the original effects a little more palatable. External shots of the Enterprise, ships and planets have been replaced with CGI, which is heretical in some quarters but is an enormous improvement to the non-purist. Interiors and props are still extraordinarily dated of course … the props really look like nothing more than props. It takes a bit more imagination and suspension of disbelief. To a degree this is easier in the original series than in shows from the 70s and 80s with nominally better special effects. The props and sets are so clearly just props and sets in the original “Star Trek” that it’s easier to just accept them as that. Later special effects that still aren’t photorealistic tend to fall into the Uncanny Valley and actually end up being less tolerable overall.

So if you can’t look past unrealistic effects and dated props, then you probably are not going to enjoy any of the episodes of the original series. But give this a try first before dismissing it outright as unwatchable: Do you like plays? The skull Hamlet holds doesn’t look even remotely real, the ghost of his father clearly just has white makeup dredged on extra thick, and the swords are obviously plastic and draw not a drop of believable blood in all the fighting. The point that I may be beating into the ground is that if you are willing to accept that the story is more important than the props, then you may find something to appreciate in the original “Star Trek.”

The original “Star Trek” series was never really about the starships and space battles, though in the wake of Star Wars, the movies and later shows incorporated much more of that element. The original series at its heart was a vehicle for weaving particularly philosophical short stories. Great science fiction is not about the future, it is about the present. The trappings of the future give flexibility and license to tell broader stories that are metaphors for universal themes.

The show is famous for having recruited rather accomplished science fiction authors of the day to write occasional scripts, most notably Harlan Ellison, Theodore Sturgeon, and Richard Matheson. Despite only running for three seasons, the original series managed seven nominations for the Hugo award, including all five slots in 1968. These bits and pieces of trivia give the show a modicum of gravitas in retrospect, a sort of credibility independent of the fan phenomenon it became ex post facto.

The culture of the series has one iron clad rule, the Prime Directive, the rule that cannot be broken. It states that there should be no interference in the natural development of other societies, that even though they might construct hell and destroy themselves, that it is their right as societies to either build something horrible or something beautiful. It’s a daring philosophy, even several decades removed from Vietnam. Kirk of course breaks the directive about every other episode, but it is not something treated lightly. It’s a lesson in the construction of ethics in society that still rings true today. Sometimes horrible things are necessary for the greater good, but a responsible society does not respond by institutionalizing horror, but by outlawing it. And investing command in people who are willing to break the rules anyway, even if they will be damned for it.

In Gene Roddenberry’s vision of the future, might does not make right. The plot is rarely resolved by fighting and winning in the original “Star Trek,” the focus not just on outsmarting, but on understanding and empathizing. It’s a curious and powerful sort of nonviolence: willing to defend oneself, but not willing to kill without reason. Prepared to fight, but more interested in talking. There’s an inner strength to the philosophy that is at home with the libertarianism of Heinlein. A free man can never be defeated, only killed.

The original series did not have any real story arcs to speak of, which makes it particularly amenable to the watching of a handful of episodes. There are numerous top ten lists floating around if you’d like to snag a few of the best. Personally, if you’re only going to watch a couple of episodes, I’d recommend “City on the Edge of Forever” (season 1, episode 28), “The Enemy Within” (season 1, episode 5), and “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield” (season 3, episode 70).

At least for now, all of the episodes of the original series are available on CBS’s website.

“I do not say that we have the right, but it is possible that we have the duty. It is why one makes rules not to be broken, and chooses a man able to break them.” — Spock, “The Price of the Phoenix”

Steven Lloyd Wilson is the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. He is a hopeless romantic who can be found wandering San Diego’s strip malls and suburbs looking for his mislaid soul and waiting for the revolution to come. Burning Violin is still published weekly on Wednesdays at www.burningviolin.com, along with assorted fiction and other ramblings.


Pajiba Love 03/25/09 | Where the Wild Things Are Trailer



Comments

Oh, the effects are really, really bad and the acting isn'y much better, but I still watch it whenever I come across it. It will always have a place somewhere in my heart.

Posted by: Elsie at March 25, 2009 2:05 PM

For me, the terrible effects and props (by today's standard) really haven't detracted from the series at all. They add to the fun campyness of it all and, the music, oh the music. Eddie Murphy had it down pat.

Nice column Stipe.

Posted by: admin at March 25, 2009 2:10 PM

Although I prefer Next Generation, I'd be lying if I didn't say that the original Star Trek was one of the greatest series of all time. The best part is that you can watch the episodes out of order, and still get full enjoyment out of it.

Posted by: George at March 25, 2009 2:12 PM

I just got a glimpse of the 'remastered' Star Trek with the CGI external shot of the Enterprise. No, no, and more no.

It doesn't help that it looks extra fake next to the clearly fake sets. It's worse that the "CGI" effects look like they're outtakes from "The Last Starfighter".

Posted by: Neodiogenes at March 25, 2009 2:12 PM

I was disturbed to learn in Pajiba love that I wasn't going to get my Burning Violin/Stipe fix here anymore.

And then, there's this awesome column by Steven and I think, well at least they replaced Stipe with another intellegent guy who can also work the language like a street pimp. I continued reading and had to check the end before I finished because I was convinced it was you. Yeah! No Stipe Steven withdrawals!

Posted by: Sharopa at March 25, 2009 2:13 PM

Nicely done.

While the effects may not hold up well, certainly Shatner and Takai have. And it will always be impossible not to compare any follow-ups to the original.

Posted by: Cindy at March 25, 2009 2:14 PM

I don't care about the cheap sets and bad makeup, but the writing on the original show bores me to tears. I can't watch it.

Posted by: Lucas at March 25, 2009 2:16 PM

You're a damn good writer Stripe, but it's a little confusing referring to you by your real name. I'll get used to it, thought.

Posted by: George at March 25, 2009 2:19 PM

I am shocked that you didn't mention the Star Trek Kung-Fu Style. As A kid I practiced the jump up with both feet into the opponent's chest move daily. I never could make the Karate Chop of Unconsciousness work though.

Posted by: ed newman at March 25, 2009 2:22 PM

Star Trek was originally broadcast on NBC, not CBS. The series was initially offered to CBS, but they turned it down.

The DVDs are being released by Paramount. CBS got broadcast rights when Paramount/Viacom sold off their TV division to CBS back in 2005.

Posted by: jthomas666 at March 25, 2009 2:33 PM

I don't care about the cheap sets and bad makeup, but the writing on the original show bores me to tears. I can't watch it.

Posted by: Lucas at March 25, 2009 2:16 PM
---
I used to be riveted by this show as a kid, but I catch one now and again today and ... It's hard to believe something so cheesy that took itself (usually) so seriously ever became popular. The plots bludgeon you in the forehead with a morality-play 2-by-4.

I was channeling surfing the other night and saw the opening with the Enterprise floating against some planet, and I kept going.

I'm with Lucas. Can't. Watch.

Posted by: bucdaddy at March 25, 2009 2:33 PM

My personal favorite was the "Interlock Fingers and Club with Forearms Across the Back" technique.

TOS took a rather casual view of the Prime Directive. It really was only a struggle for Kirk to enforce it whenever he didn't care. Aside from that it was "Prime Directive...Schmime Directive."

God...I wish the theme song to Enterprise had been better. I would have liked it aside from that damn song....

Posted by: alphawhiskey at March 25, 2009 2:36 PM

I confess that I have a weakness for old, cheesy, sci-fi shows. Dr. Who and the original Star Trek have something in common. There was nothing else like them. I love them for what they are, and not for what they lack.

Star Trek's theme music was unique and memorable.
They had computer monitors in everyone's room 40 years before that sort of thing became common for real.
They had small floppy disks 20 years before they were invented.
They had electronic doors before I ever saw them in stores.
They had a black woman on the bridge, as an equal to the white men, when Martin Luther King was still hoping his dream would come true.
They had tribbles and Harry Mudd.
They were not afraid to do the occasional comedy sci-fi show.
I like my sci-fi with a dose of comedy every now and then.

Posted by: BWeaves (from a different IP address) at March 25, 2009 2:36 PM

I am totally a TNG girl but I do catch an episode of the original every once in a while. I just love it cuz it is pure camp. It entertains bad effects and all.

Posted by: Tra at March 25, 2009 2:39 PM

I've been watching the movies recently - compared to the TV series episodes they don't age well. The first movie, despite how boring it can be, fits surprisingly well with the series. Khan needs nothing said than, "Yours is the . . .s-s-superior. . ". III is tripped up over its own plot since Nimoy decided to come back (again). And unlike most, I like Christopher Lloyd as a Klingon.

But watching IV last night - with the whales - it struck me how badly this movie has aged. It's tedious even with the genuinely funny parts. The things that ST could get away with in bad acting or bad plot before really glare and feel painful.

I won't watch V, and I'm actually thinking VI could also have turned into a haggish crudfest in the VCR box . .

Posted by: idiosynchronic at March 25, 2009 2:40 PM

For nerds of a certain vintage, this series was the fountainhead. Before discovering Tolkien, before reading Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov, before my first desktop programming experience, before D&D, and way before finally getting my pencil sharpened by some young lass, there were treasured afternoon reruns. 4:30 p.m. every schoolday.

You want to talk about appointment television? I'm on my way to the schoolbus, motherfucker, and if you're still in my way in four nanoseconds, there are going to be dorky Converse marks up your back and over your shoulders.

And the writing wasn't bad, it was revolutionary. This was 40 years ago, and many of the concepts offered in the show were unheard of at the time. Some of the dialogue was a little clunky, but if you watch other shows from the 60s, "Star Trek" was miles ahead of most of it. It's easy to throw stones with all the conceptual and dramatic riches we have available today, but there was nothing like it at the time, and that's what makes it special.

Also: Television's first interracial kiss, between Kirk and Uhura. While it was not voluntary, being force upon them by telepathic aliens, it was highly controversial at the time, as was the Bennetton ad casting.

Top 10 epis:

1. "The Menagerie"
2. "The City on the Edge of Forever" (Joan Collins!)
3. "Journey to Babel"
4. "Mirror Mirror" (Evil Spock!)
5. "Errand of Mercy"
6. "Balance of Terror"
7. "Bread and Circuses"
8. "Day of the Dove"
9. "The Tholian Web"
10. "Obsession"

Posted by: rikkitikkitavi at March 25, 2009 2:41 PM

They show that clip of Kirk and Uhuru kissing at the National Space Center in D.C.

It's sad that even today it can prompt some to anger.

Every time I see a Klingon in any post-original Trek series, I've got a nagging urge to question a real Trekkie about them. In the origional series the Klingons look like regular Humans but by the time of TNG they've become all crested ridges and bad teeth. I know it's from some sort of genetic manipulation but how much time passed for the entire society to so radically alter it's concepts of "beauty"?

Posted by: Sharopa at March 25, 2009 2:56 PM

I don't care who you are, tell me you haven't tried the "Live Long and Prosper" hand salute at least once, just to see if you could get your third and fourth fingers to stay apart like that.

Posted by: BWeaves at March 25, 2009 2:59 PM

Personally, I love how you can date a Star Trek episode by what the aliens look like.

Pointy ears? ST classic
Blue skin? ST classic
Bumpy forehead? TNG
Bumpy nose? DS9
Big boobs? All of them.

Does every alien have big boobs? Why don't some of them have udders?

However, it's also wierd that the most interesting character in every Star Trek incarnation has also been the character with the least personality.

Spock ST Classic
Data the robot TNG
Holographic Doctor Voyager

Posted by: BWeaves at March 25, 2009 3:06 PM

BWeaves, When we were kids my sister and I practiced long and hard to be able to do that. Testing. Yup, still can.

Posted by: Sharopa at March 25, 2009 3:07 PM

Still can't, BWeaves. Never could. Heaven help the poor Jew with my dexterity.

The Holographic Doctor had -a- character; it was like all the anti-social issues they could muster short of smoking & drinking. Just nothing that made him remotely 3 dimensional (ha) until very, very late in the series.

Curmudgeon doctors work, but more character has to show early on. McCoy, Cottle, et al.

But I digest . .

Posted by: idiosynchronic at March 25, 2009 3:30 PM

"The Original Final Frontier" heading and no cracks about Uranus?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at March 25, 2009 3:49 PM

...no cracks about Uranus?

Sorry L.O.V.E., but they renamed it to end that joke once and for all. It's now Urectum.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at March 25, 2009 4:00 PM

It's Kirk, it's Spock, it's McCoy.

'nuff said.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 25, 2009 4:11 PM

I never got into the series, but with the increased ad stuff for the movie, I've been wondering if I should check it out... I still haven't made up my mind, but I'm at least a little more intrigued.

Posted by: Kayanne at March 25, 2009 4:23 PM

The idea that anyone could think the original Trek not worth watching under any circumstances appalls me. This is why so much science fiction stinks. All they want is special effects (thats what we called CGI when I was a kid, whippersnapper). All other Trek's are less watchable and age less well because they are more PC and less Wagon Train, although I liked Enterprise

Posted by: jjv at March 25, 2009 4:38 PM

Urectum? But I hardly knew him.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at March 25, 2009 5:11 PM

Stipe, was Star Trek set before or after 2660? Cuz if Star Trek was before 2660 then you're wrong.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at March 25, 2009 5:14 PM

I'm still surprised by how Mr. Wilson hasn't thwacked George yet, unless it's a joke between them.

"The Enterprise Incident" is a really good episode too, though the Romulan captain looked better in her uniform than her "something more comfortable" while working it on Spock.

Posted by: Jay at March 25, 2009 5:48 PM

Ah, Star Trek is set before 2660, but it is in an alternate timeline from Futurama. We know this for sure because the Star Trek actors appear as actors in Futurama.

But, you might say, even if that is true, then it isn't appropriate to make a joke about 2660 in the past tense in the year 2009. However, if you recall, Fry goes back in time to 2000 after hearing that joke, so that reference does make sense in his relative past tense at this moment, as long as you realize the terrible truth ... that I am Fry.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go see about a narwhal.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at March 25, 2009 5:53 PM

I'm still surprised by how Mr. Wilson hasn't thwacked George yet, unless it's a joke between them.

Well on several occasions I started typing replies to George wondering about his calling me "Stripe", because he's so insistently consistent about it, and I can't for the life of me figure out a double meaning or pun to it. But each time I do, I get this vision of George screeching "Why do you mock my bad spelling? Why does the dyslexia always win in the end?" and then hanging himself in my front yard dressed as Anakin Skywalker. I just couldn't handle the guilt.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at March 25, 2009 5:58 PM

Wellll, it's alright. I'll be the dark knight of spelling.....cause I can take it.

Posted by: Jay at March 25, 2009 6:02 PM

rikkitikkitavi>> Well said!!!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at March 25, 2009 6:12 PM

...that I am Fry.

Not Bender?!
Are you sure?

Posted by: Sharopa at March 25, 2009 6:23 PM

Aw, Jesus, dude, that opening quote is my absolute favorite Star Trek quote of all time, not just TOS but all of 'em.

You write like John Lennon played guitar: you make a lot of technical mistakes but the tune and the chutzpah are so bitchin' that nobody cares. I've bookmarked Burning Violin, but please keep writing for The 'Jiba.

Posted by: Jerce at March 25, 2009 6:35 PM

i must mention the 'other' gene, my cousin gene coon. did a lot of great work on that series. funny thing is, no one ever told me we were related. i just started watching reruns of the show when i was 12 and thought it was funny he had teh same last name. when i mentioned watching it to my dad, he mentioned my cousin.

funny? no. interesting? no. who cares? me. a little.

Posted by: jimmy at March 25, 2009 8:02 PM

And he actually co-wrote the aforementioned "A Taste of Armageddon"! I went ahead and watched it just now. It's a good example of something Nicholas Meyer said about how Trek takes "intractable" Earth problems, puts em out in fantasy space and suddenly "Oh! Well the solution to this is really simple!" Stupid Earthlings.

While the filmmakers feared it was possibly too on the nose, "The Undiscovered Country" is another good example (though Meyer said no one seemed to notice at the time how directly it addressed the death throes of the Cold War).

Posted by: Jay at March 25, 2009 8:12 PM

its like visiting an old friend whenever Star Trek is being rerun!live long and prosper....

Posted by: pasadenamike at March 25, 2009 10:15 PM

"Sharopa: Every time I see a Klingon in any post-original Trek series, I've got a nagging urge to question a real Trekkie about them. In the origional series the Klingons look like regular Humans but by the time of TNG they've become all crested ridges and bad teeth. I know it's from some sort of genetic manipulation but how much time passed for the entire society to so radically alter it's concepts of "beauty"?"

IIRC, I think Worf was asked this question once in an episode, and he simply growled, "We don't discuss it." When the series was in its infancy, they hadn't created backstories for all the alien races....

still one of my fave shows, and I used to watch the original series in the 60's.

Posted by: nancy at March 26, 2009 12:17 PM

I think the obvious answer to the question, "Why do Klingons look so different now?" is "budget reasons". That DS9 episode in which Worf claims they don't discuss the matter with outsiders was just the writers having a little fun.

Posted by: DeadBessie at March 26, 2009 2:34 PM

dead horse- take that!

and good old dead cousin gene invented them thar' klingons.

Posted by: jimmy at March 27, 2009 1:47 PM

ok

Posted by: sam at March 30, 2009 11:26 AM

Thank you, Bucdaddy. I've reserved you a seat at the next meeting of the Cool Club.

Posted by: Lucas at April 4, 2009 4:19 AM