free counter with statistics Spooks: Code 9 | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

2732163086_620e667350.jpg

Are U Hip? Are U Edgy? Boy Golly, Have I Got a Show 4 U!


“Spooks: Code 9” (UK) / Alex (the Odd) O’Brien

TV Reviews | August 27, 2008 | Comments (46)


“Spooks” is a home-grown British drama show about the lives and loves of agents within MI5, our country’s secret service. In a shocking break from tradition (for any program not based on a series of books containing grisly murders or starring Charles Dance) “Spooks” set out from the beginning to be taken seriously as a drama. And sure enough an interesting and ethnically diverse cast was introduced, all with their own issues and heavily hinted moral grey zones, the youngest and prettiest of which was very swiftly plunged head first into a deep fat fryer. On screen. Because “Spooks,” we were to understand, was serious business. And, up until the dwindling final seasons when every one including the network executives in charge of advertising it forgot it existed, it was able to maintain a generally high standard.

The spin off, “Code 9”, is set after a nuclear detonation following the London Olympics in 2012 devastates the capital and necessitates the formation of a new MI5, apparently from impossibly young and pretty spies. Because that’s who you want on your side in a crisis: Really, really pretty people with really, really shiny hair. “Spooks: Code 9” is the younger and edgier cousin who skates in on one of those newfangled wheeled-boards and puts on its dance metal (or whatever it is the kids are listening to nowadays) before drinking all your diet soda and then trashing the place. This is only mild hyperbole, I’m slap bang in the middle of their target demographic (which I know is not the kiddie set as iPlayer requires me to confirm that I am over eighteen before it will allow me to get to the hip and edgy action) and the immersive advertising campaigns make even me feel like telling the whippersnappers to get off my lawn.

From the very beginning sequence, a series of smug introductions to the main cast framed as their “recruitment videos”, I decide that I hate these people. Not just a mild dislike but rather the sudden and incredibly pressing desire to hurt each and every one of the main players repeatedly with something dull and rusty. There’s Jez, the ex-criminal who is “streetwise” and “doesn’t play by the rules” with an accent more suited to the halls of Oxford than the streets; Rachel, an impossibly pretty, impossibly young police officer with impossibly shiny blonde hair; Rob, a ludicrously smug ex-medical student with a perma-smirk towards whom most of my ire was immediately directed; Vik, whose desire to serve his country is expressed before the show reveals that he is…. Asian (see? Edgy!); and Kylie, a pretty psychology student sick from the blast who evidently has no sense of self preservation whatsoever. The only bearable character in the first few minutes is Hannah, the recruiter, so of course it is written that something horrendous must happen to her by the end of the pilot. There is also new recruit Charlie added to the mix later on; he is immediately put in charge because a 22-year-old mathematician with less experience than everyone else on the team is obviously the best person to have running any kind of operation, ever.

The show’s tagline is “For Queen. For Country. For Kicks.” lest we forget that the show is a) edgy and b) British. Incidentally they will be reminding us of the following two facts throughout the proceedings with roughly the force and subtlety of 18 hippos tap dancing on the back of your skull which, after 50 minutes of this crap, is what you are going to wish had actually happened to you. The filming style on a whole is reminiscent of whenever “Hollyoakes”, — “Code 9’s” equal both in terms of script writing and acting talent — decides to do a very special and very edgy episode. For the uninitiated this usually consists of taking whatever technique the director learnt in film school that week and using it in every. Single. Fucking. Shot. In this case: Extreme close ups combined with quick cuts and jerky camera movements. This gets very annoying very quickly. The show also likes to use juxtaposition, a technique which is surprisingly effective the first time it is used — shots of Jez sexing up one of his informants (because he doesn’t play by the rules, you see) with the videotaping of some grusomeish corpses. Unfortunately by the “spies having fun in a club/police at a dark and spooky building” scene that starts episode three it has worn more than a little thin. And then come the fucking Union Jacks. Because the viewers of the show are evidently morons who will forget that the show is, in fact, British. Despite the accents and continual geographical references the entire length of the program is peppered with Union Jack flags. You could say they were going for a motif, but I think that would probably be giving them entirely too much credit. From the insipid Union Jack Challenge initiation ritual in episode one, to the billowing flags that mark scene transitions, they are everybloodywhere. Perhaps the most grating example of this is the marking out of surveillance targets by pausing the action and overlaying a Union Jack pattern on their face. This is irritating from the off, because it was already made perfectly clear who the target was by the fact he was the only person in the techno club wearing a leather jacket and scowling at people.

As far as the actual acting goes, each of the main cast members have that very special and particular brand of English accent that can only be found after the speaker has spent several years at drama school and taken at least three classes in “regional accents”. Every line is studied, measured and incredibly forced. If you can watch even five minutes without being hyper aware that these people are acting then you have far better abilities to suspend disbelief than I do. Stresses are placed on the wrong words, lines run too smoothly into one another and it’s all very, very dramatic. And annoying. (Did I mention that it’s annoying? And also: edgy.) Georgia Moffett, who plays Kylie, and is probably more recognisable from “Dr Who”, is absolutely wasted here — she outshines every single other cast member and it is actually kind of embarrassing to watch.

The overall premise of the show is an interesting one, the reformation of a society after a devastating event, but it is mainly wasted potential. The writers appear to have embraced the “Oh my god the sky is falling, let’s get drunk and fuck while it does” aspect of such a disaster with gusto, but whether they’ll explore any of the darker themes remains to be seen. They make a decent attempt with episode three’s plot concerning black market radiation sickness drugs but it quickly descends into a badly acted, poorly scripted and very strangely edited farce. There is certainly potential for the show to improve but with the current cast and production team I can’t say it is particularly likely.

Alex (the Odd) O’Brien covers British television for Pajiba. You can follow her travails over on Ink and Apples.


DVD Releases 08/26/08 | Wanted



Comments

I've seen the original Spooks advertised here (here being the convict colony in the Southern Hemisphere) on the Pommy Channel (UK-TV Foxtel) and thought it looked interesting. Are you saying this should be avoided or just the spin off?

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at August 27, 2008 4:32 AM

Ooo... pajiba's gone and got someone to do British TV. Very exciting. Are we gonna have reviews of Life on Mars and Peep Show?

Posted by: jim at August 27, 2008 5:32 AM

Good call Jim, I love me some Peep Show.
Favourite lines have to be
I'm a dirty hobbit and she's a sexy elf so she might be... "Oh! You dirty hobbit. Take off my bodkin and my jerkin." "Oh, yeah... pixie ears. But that sword." What if she was a hobbit slayer? I'd just use my enchanted amulet. "Yeah. Yield to me, hobbit-slayer. You will touch my magic cock."
or
She's ignoring me. Of course, she's ignoring me. I sent her a swastika.

Posted by: Dexter Morgan at August 27, 2008 5:40 AM

Welcome back Alex!

And with some fine news as well. Admitted, I gave up on Spooks mid series 3. Not that I didn't like it anymore, if anything, I was glad to see Matthew "less facial expression than Keanu" McFadyen go. Now I don't know how high they kept up the "this is serious business" attitude afterwards, but at least they didn't pummel to extreme silliness like The Wonderful Shenanigans of J. Bauer & Foes. (still a fan, though).

This sparks my interest. Alas, I only have Auntie Beeb's One & Two. Here's hoping for a rerun.

Thx

Posted by: Adere at August 27, 2008 5:55 AM

Too eager too comment: having read the whole thing now, this does not sound interesting at all.

What's your take on Bonekickers, except for that gdwfl title?

Posted by: Adere at August 27, 2008 7:06 AM

*to comment.

Sigh.

Posted by: Adere at August 27, 2008 7:07 AM

"...From the very beginning sequence, a series of smug introductions to the main cast framed as their "recruitment videos", I decide that I hate these people. Not just a mild dislike but rather the sudden and incredibly pressing desire to hurt each and every one of the main players repeatedly with something dull and rusty...."

----------------------------------------------

*wipes tear*

One day I'm gonna marry a girl like this.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 27, 2008 7:13 AM

I had a feeling....and then I saw what the Times critic said which confirmed it: "Spooks: Code 9, which is to Spooks what Torchwood is to Doctor Who (ie, not as good)."

Doesn't mean it's a fact that it's not good, but it probably is "Torchwood", which leaves me kind of indifferent. Poor Miss Moffett. Come back, Jenny!

Posted by: Jay at August 27, 2008 7:30 AM

Pajiba is a strange little vagrant community. I've been around long enough to be aware of AtO's absence, but not long enough to feel comfortable asking about it. Then her name appears in the masthead and it's strangely compelling...like, "so that's what she's been up to." Very cool.

So it's with a tinge of regret that I find myelf a slave to compulsion and thus forced to inquire about the grizzly murders described in the opening paragraph. Really? They murder bears in the UK? On the positive side, they aren't pandas. That would be creepy.

Enough with the punking. She redeemed herself almost immediately with her disdain for all things pretty and shiny; it was a smooth ride after that. I have a hard enough time ignoring TV on this side of the Atlantic, and she managed to make me feel smug in specifically ignoring something from the other side. Well done, Alex! I look forward to your sophomore effort.

Posted by: Che Grovera at August 27, 2008 8:10 AM

Hey Girl! Look at you, running with the big dogs now.

At first, I thought this review would frustrate me at my lack of BBC or BBCAmerica and force me to bang my head against the wall at the loss of more good programming.

But ah, now I feel better. Not all the shows across the pond are exceptional. Apparently, I am naive.

Spooks:Code 9 sounds like someone sliced and diced The Mod Squad, Charlie's Angels, 21 Jumpstreet, and 24, dumped in a pint, stirred it with a cricket bat, put the whole mess in a ramekin, draped a crust in the shape of the Union Jack over the whole thing, and tossed it in the oven. Then it was baked into a gooey mess.

Color me shocked; I was not aware that the British accent could be mangled by actual British people. I thought only Americans were capable. Then again, I've heard some pretty atrocious Southern accents from Yank actors.

Good shootin' Alex. Can't wait for more.

Posted by: Alabamapink at August 27, 2008 8:49 AM

The overly affected "English accents" AtO describes are what linguists call the: "Speaking in Paltrow" phenomenon, it happens when you spend too much time with your head up your own ass.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 27, 2008 8:54 AM

Good review. Clever, entertaining writing and I got the point early enough that I never felt like you were leading me on just to give me blue balls and low self-esteem at the end of the night.

Posted by: Lucas at August 27, 2008 8:59 AM

..."Spooks: Code 9, which is to Spooks what Torchwood is to Doctor Who (ie, not as good)."

Doesn't mean it's a fact that it's not good, but it probably is "Torchwood"...

But it bears mentioning that Torchwood got an awful lot better during its second season. Sometimes shows take time to find their tone. That said, since I never actually watched the original Spooks (though I've heard about that deep-fat fryer thing before and feel oddly compelled to search for it on YouTube) I'm unlikely to watch the teen-y spin-off. Nice review, though.

Posted by: Shay at August 27, 2008 9:19 AM

But will Code 9 go all pansexual too, or is it pre-watershed?

"HETRO LOVE IS WRONGS!!"

Posted by: Jay at August 27, 2008 9:30 AM

Forgive me, but aren't spies supposed to be really, really ordinary looking? Real spy agencies don't even hire redheads, so they don't stand out. It just kills me that every spy show or spy movie has impossibly good looking spies that would turn your head and make you stalk them. And they would never hire people who don't play by the rules. Actually, that's what annoyed me about Torchwood, season 1. Everyone kept taking the alien artifacts home to play with. Stupid, stupid.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 27, 2008 9:32 AM

This is so exciting! Now I can read about crappy British TV shows too! I don't even have BBC America, so I'll probably never have any idea what you're talking about, but still. Fun! And, yay for Alex the Odd!

P.S. Back to the old header-thingie? Awesome. I hate change. Not new-reviewer change, site-design change.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at August 27, 2008 9:42 AM

Shay, the early original Spooks has some fine heart-stopping moments, other than the frying incident. My favorite, at least the one I remember best, was the episode with Alexander Siddig as an ambiguous Algerian spy trying to uncover a sleeper cell in a mosque. He later reprised the role as Kiefer's lapdog.

Plus, it had Jenny Agutter.

I like me some Jenny.

Posted by: Adere at August 27, 2008 10:28 AM

Yes, but was it edgy? And British? I only watch things that are edgy. And British. So bloody impossibly soaked in British.

Great review, Alex. Your absence was noticed many times. Glad to see you've become one of the almighty columnists of the site. Now we can bitch you out for unsnarky reviews and gratuitous pandering.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at August 27, 2008 10:44 AM

"dance metal." I am still giggling over that one. Great review, Alex, so glad to see you again.

Posted by: nancy at August 27, 2008 10:55 AM

Oh come on! So emm effing what if these spies are young and beautiful! Who wants to watch plain people do interesting things? No one, that's who!!

And oh my gosh I'm SOoo freaking sorry if these poor kids don't live up to your exacting standards of acting ability! Were the producers supposed to hold off casting the show until they somehow magically found young, impossibly beautiful British people who could convincingly play an elite team of superspies?? Please! You might as well ask them to cast a unicorn!

Finally, please lay off their sexy accents! I know that Brits are immune to them, but red-blooded Americans like me love the automatic class and sophistication that comes with being British, and we LOVE ACCENTS!!

You guys are SOOO CRANKY!

Posted by: Mella at August 27, 2008 11:16 AM

Wait... spy agencies don't hire redheads? You sure about that, BWeaves?

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at August 27, 2008 11:20 AM

Nice review, Alex. Haven't heard much about this one, but never watched Spooks anyway, so probably won't check it out.

Have you heard about Pater Kay's new sitcom? It's a spoof or reality talent shows...looks good. Any chance of a review when it comes out?

Or how about a retrospective on Phoenix Nights?

Posted by: boogs at August 27, 2008 11:21 AM

Uh...that should be Peter Kay.

Posted by: boogs at August 27, 2008 11:22 AM

"Speaking in Paltrow" phenomenon

Didn't this originate with Madonna? Her head is so far up her own ass that it's back in its original position. That's why she always looks so strained and veiny now.

Back with a bang, AtO.

Posted by: katy at August 27, 2008 11:42 AM

Brilliantly done Miss Odd, you've reminded us that stupid television truly knows no geographical bounds. Just when I was wondering why no British shows appeared on the top 20 of 20 list, I now realise you must be just as starved for good material on that side of the pond as well (although I do love me some "Yes Minister"). Not that I'm likely to watch it, though, I'm glad you were able to hit the shows weaknesses and summarise its essence without giving away any key spoilers. Good job!

One day I'm gonna marry a girl like this.

Best of luck to you Slim, although I think this particular lass is already spoken for (by her stalkers, anyway). She does have a very winsome sense of snark, no?

Posted by: lordhelmet at August 27, 2008 12:03 PM

Pater Kay...hehe. It isn't even that funny but I still choked, for some reason.

I have missed you Alex, but I figured you were all busy with the teaching and stuff, and thus was too busy to frolic about with us. Glad to see you back.

Posted by: Jaci at August 27, 2008 12:13 PM

how do you really feel AtO?

i'm sure i will end up watching this show, even if i do hate all the main characters. i love Spooks--MI-5 in the states--and i have fairly low standards for tv (AI, Dancing with the "Stars" and most sitcoms being the only shows i can't make myself watch).

i also love Torchwood but i probably wouldn't watch it without the sci-fi/supernatural theme.

Posted by: pq at August 27, 2008 12:14 PM

Saw the first two episodes & truly couldn't stomach any more -- Spooks Jr. took the worst aspects of Torchwood and embraced them with gusto. The actors are awful and the plots suck and oy vey, the dialogue is worse than what Vaughn had to spit out in the last seasons of Alias.

That said, I'm totally on board for Spooks season seven (October, I hope!) with the addition of Richard Armitage (yum). Spooks is SERIOUS BUSINESS, PEOPLE.

Posted by: zh at August 27, 2008 12:17 PM

"For Queen, for country..."

Are fucking kidding me? In a post apocalyptic world, you people choose to keep the monarchy? You deserve every bad television show they throw at you.

I suppose the only saving grace is that if it's still "queen" in 2012, we can assume the rest of the idiot parasites were wiped out in said apocalypse?

Oh and welcome back Alex, Sweetheart. You've been missed.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 27, 2008 1:27 PM

Ugh, I've only seen two episodes of Spooks, and the second one was the deep-fat fryer episode, which haunts me to this day. Actually, it probably tops the list of the most disturbing hours of TV I've seen... beating Jack Bauer shooting Ryan Chapelle, or that episode of The Shield where Dutch choked a cat.

Again: ugh.

Posted by: Crat at August 27, 2008 1:29 PM

zh:

Did you jusy say Richard Armitage? I. Love. That. Man. Hated that fact that he was stuck in Robin Hood for so long. I'm a happy woman now.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 27, 2008 1:47 PM

Paddydog: I agree, he was wasted as Guy of Gisbourne (though you have to admit that he looked great in that same leather suit week after week). He's listed in IMDB as the new lead for Spooks, coming in to replace the current one (Adam Carter is cracking up, woo hoo!). I predict that my computer may short out from my drooling on the keyboard.

Posted by: zh at August 27, 2008 1:52 PM

zh:

Did you ever watch some of the "behind the scenes" clips from Robin Hood where he was interviewed sans shirt in just the leather britches? It was a beautiful thing.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 27, 2008 1:59 PM

Yay Alex! I am so excited to read your reviews!!

This review just made me happy to know that even overseas they have to deal with lame-ass over-done tv shows. But you know, I guess the people in America (that's right, every one of you) LOVES, just LOVEEEEEES those sophisticated British accents, no matter how poorly done! The accent doesn't have to be good, or you know, authentic, because I'm from Amurrica and I can't tell the difference. The only thing I know for sure is that my front fanny gets all tingly when those cockney twitterings enter my ear canals.

Phew, I'm glad I got that off my chest.

I'm off to look for unicorns.

Posted by: Just Amanda at August 27, 2008 2:03 PM

Saw a commercial for this when I was in London - it made me laugh. I doubt this will be the trashy fun that Torchwood is, so I will skip it.

Most importantly, when will the BBC iPlayer work outside of Europe?

Posted by: Marianne at August 27, 2008 2:09 PM

" Actually, that's what annoyed me about Torchwood, season 1. Everyone kept taking the alien artifacts home to play with. Stupid, stupid."

Well, to be fair, Jack had given them strict orders not to play with the alien artifacts - but the Torchwood team weren't terribly good at obeying authority. Not when it has twinkly blue eyes, dimples, white white teeth, and chooses team members based on their hotness, anyway.... ;-)
(Actually, I think season 2 TW had more good episodes than season 4 DW had. So sue me...)

Thanks, Alex. I never considered actually watching this show except to make fun of it & tear it to shreds, but now I don't even have to do that. You have parked your flag on that peak, it's all yours, and I salute you!

Posted by: Tarn at August 27, 2008 2:21 PM

I AM ONLY 25! STOP MAKING ME FEEL OLD, YOU GODDAMN YOUNGINS!!!!!!!!

AND STOP RUINING GOOD SHOWS WITH YOUR...YOUNGIN...NESS?

Um...I mean, great review, Alex.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 27, 2008 3:10 PM

Wait--Spooks is the same thing as MI-5? Maybe I'll have to start watching it now!

Posted by: gelis at August 27, 2008 3:34 PM

Yes, they renamed MI:5 into "spooks" for the US audience, presuming I suppose that we are all too stupid to figure out what MI:5 is.

Paddydog: I haven't seen those interviews, but I ... uh ... is it hot in here? ... I will be on the lookout for them. Usually I spend my time watching "North & South" and dreaming of untying his cravat. Heh.

Posted by: zh at August 27, 2008 4:36 PM

Ah...so THIS is what you've been up to, AtO. And teaching. And The Boy. And your blog. Ok, so you have a life, you don't have to rub it in our faces by...not being here to rub it in our faces...I'm not making sense, am I?

This sounds like the sort of show I loooove to watch when I'm really bored just so I can laugh at it. Because I'm smug and a hipster and like to smugly smirk hipsterishly at silly shows.

Posted by: Joker at August 27, 2008 5:43 PM

crat - the deep fryer episode is the ONLY episode I have ever seen, and the reason I have only ever seen one episode of spooks. Even my deep deep love for Rupert Penry-Jones is not enough for me to watch anymore.

However, if there was an episdoe with Rupert AND Richard Armitage, this may force me to reconsider.

Great review, Alex! Everyone expects me to be watching this because I will try anything British once, but this just sounded so bad that not even I downloaded it. Glad to hear I was justified...

Posted by: rach at August 27, 2008 9:56 PM

Can only agree with the reviewer ... I "obtained" the first three episodes, but couldn't get beyond the first ten minutes of the first episode. Immediate hard delete of outrageously feculent telly.

Enormous sympathy to anyone who had to sit through even one full episode.

Posted by: hell.kelpie at August 27, 2008 10:47 PM

"For Queen, for country..."

So, it's a show about a cover band?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at August 28, 2008 3:30 AM

Yes, they renamed MI:5 into "spooks" for the US audience, presuming I suppose that we are all too stupid to figure out what MI:5 is.

Other way around, zh. The original name was 'Spooks', but IIRC, somebody thought that could be taken as a racist term in the US, so it was renamed 'MI5' for broadcast over there.

I've only seen one episode, which guest-starred Anthony Head. It was ok, but didn't make me want to watch any more of it.

Posted by: Tarn at August 28, 2008 11:47 AM

"I am James Bond" is one of my favourite Peep Show quotes it kinda morphed into me and my friends cry of stupidity when we'd made a mistake.

Theres also a reverse Paltrow happens and young british actor comes back with a totally different accent. Ringo Starr being the creator of this. This hybrid accent only actually exists in the Richard Curtis version of Britain.

Ooooh Pajiba could do a British week or a look at the films of Britain like they recently did with pensylvannia. Although being British most of that went informatively over my head.

Posted by: jim at August 28, 2008 12:13 PM

I really lost intrest in Spooks after the 1st season after they got rid of "Tom"
I was really addicted to it for ages, but this show seems less like Spooks and more like Spy Kids attempting to be "dark & mature"

*sigh* I dont think i should waste my time beating my head against a wall trying to work out why

Posted by: Andromeda at October 1, 2008 10:28 PM