web
counter
 

Call Me A Cynic

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (18)



school_pride_nbc.jpg

We don’t normally get to review shows or films in advance because of our official policy of not being whores, but a funny thing happened on the airplane. First, they showed a screening of Grown-Ups, which thanks to Dustin’s sacrifice, I knew better than to plug in my ear phones for. But after that movie finished, the little NBC logo came on and I thought I knew exactly what was next, having flown an excessive number of times in the last year. An episode of “The Office” from a season or two ago, or sometimes “30 Rock.” The flight was almost three hours old, my iPod was almost dead, so I figured a little of that would hit the spot. Instead, for some reason, they showed the pilot for “School Pride,” which isn’t slated for broadcast until October 15th.

I’m not sure what made me keep watching it since I generally loathe any reality television that doesn’t involve food.

The show’s premise is sort of like one of those home makeover shows except instead of a house, they’re renovating an entire school. A really shitty middle school to be precise. Enterprise Middle School is a deteriorating school in one of the worst neighborhoods in the country. Everything is falling apart, to a degree just shy of what you see in those online photo galleries of abandoned schools in Detroit disintegrating under the elements. There are holes in walls, paint not even peeling anymore because it all finished peeling a decade ago. Drinking fountains hang at 45 degree angles off of walls. The basketball courts outside have holes wide enough to lose smaller children in, and grass has overgrown so much from the cracks that there’s more green there than asphalt. The football field looks like someone detonated a series of landmines underneath it, and in one shot they catch a gopher popping up to survey its field. In short, this school is drowning in neglect.

So in come our intrepid team of four renovators. There’s the buff looking former SWAT team member leading the group, a painfully hipster chic journalist, a former Miss USA, and a former teacher. They survey the wasteland of a school and have the usual reality show montages of determined faces and setting up folding tables to gravely look at blueprints of the school. They divide up the work into chunks and then set about the next montage, because reality television is really just an excuse for more montages per minute than any other genre.

Before I give in to my hope-killing inner cynic, here’s what’s good about the show: It’s not about which colored swatches go best with which designer school desks. Sure, everything looks nicer than any school I’ve ever set foot in by the end, but there’s absolutely no focus on that process. The focus is on the community surrounding the school. See, four people (however photogenic) cannot rebuild an entire middle school in ten days, and instead of just bringing in other photogenic specialists or hand waving the entire process while obsessing over color schemes, the show is premised on getting donations and community volunteers to do the work. Local businesses are approached on camera and gently cajoled into donating the labor needed to actually do the work. The families of students are involved with the work that they can help with, from hauling out junk to painting and tiling.

The most successful part of the show by far is its decision to focus the narrative on a pair of students at the middle school. Far more compelling than the ubiquitous time lapse progression of construction is the series of small conversations cast members have with these kids while they help with the construction of their own school.

The other compelling part is the realization that there is an entire store room in the school filled with the very things that the classrooms are missing: printers, paper, projectors, projection screens. The confrontation between the former SWAT commander and the toad of a principal is wonderfully cathartic. There’s an element of what the fuck? that goes far beyond the initial disrepair of the school. But that’s also the core of my problem with the show.

While it is very successful at humanizing the community of a horrendous inner city middle school, and demonstrates the power of individuals to make a difference, there are looming cracks in the facade. The principal mismanaging the school into the ground? The community and television show can’t get rid of him, so after that confrontation, that problem is swept under the rug. There is a human element to the problems of the school that cannot be addressed by a physical renovation. They’ve used donations to fill the school with expensive microscopes and shiny new gym equipment in a neighborhood with one of the highest crime rates in the country. I can’t imagine what could go wrong with that idea two weeks after the cameras leave.

I’m being unduly harsh, I know. The show does a legitimately good thing and I’m looking for the rain clouds. Communities should take back their schools and they can make a difference. But that difference is only slapping bandaids on the gusher if the roots of problems aren’t also addressed. Five minutes on Google maps finds another seven middle schools in Compton, all within 3 miles of Enterprise Middle School. Can you go back to those same businesses that donated money and labor in the community and expect to get them to do it seven more times? What about the high schools and elementary schools? Are you going to get Dell or HP to donate all the computers for all of those schools too? Where is the money going to come from to maintain that fancy equipment? It’s great that someone donated projectors for every classroom, but are they also going to donate the $100 replacement bulbs for them for the next twenty years?

You can sit here and be an asshole picking holes in this sort of thing indefinitely, which seems unfair since for once a television show was doing something good. But I think that that’s exactly why the holes need to be poked at. Change without sustainability is not change, it’s just something to make you feel good without actually going through the pain of fixing a problem. It might seem boring in the context of a television show, but what I want to see is a plan. I don’t want to see a series of one-off “look what a difference we can make” circle jerks. That’s hollow. I want to see them lay it out: here’s what we did, and here’s how it can be maintained, and here’s how it can be done in every other school in the neighborhood.


Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Freakonomics" Review | Turning Perfectly Good Currency Into Monopoly Money | The Pajiba Axis of Evil -- The Six Most Detestable People in Hollywood









Comments

That right there is much of do-good government boiled down into a one-hour TV show.

Posted by: , at October 6, 2010 2:16 PM

That kind of thing usually seems like a really great idea...but I always think about the after math. Not that I'm trying to be a cynic in away...it's just...logic. Even with the Home Makeover show or whatever it is, more than one of those houses have been lost in some way.

Posted by: Candee at October 6, 2010 2:52 PM

Why is there such a heavy focus in the US on facilities and equipment versus learning? Most schools outside of the US that I have encountered have a fraction of the dedicated rooms, equipment, etc. (we had one microscope per 30 students in chem class) and yet they consistently turn out better educated students than the US (regardless of neighbourhood). I think the priorities are all turned around with a focus on stuff versus substance. You can take 30 children into a field and teach them mathematics with one chalkboard and a box of chalk.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 6, 2010 2:54 PM

Steven, your points are all well taken and I enjoyed your review of the show. In addition to hopefully helping academics by fixing up deteriorating facilities, getting people talking about the state of education in the United States is our goal. The fact you were affected and engaged by the show is a good thing and I'm glad you're talking about it.

Jacob
aka "painfully hipster chic journalist"

Posted by: Jacob Soboroff at October 6, 2010 3:00 PM

Steven,

I understand where you're coming from, and agree to a large extent with your critiques; unless the principal gets switched out (and probably a fair number of teachers with him/her) then the school still faces significant problems. Nevertheless, there's nothing more depressing than going to school in a total shithole (and one of my three schools qualified), the simple act of fixing up the facilities *will* make a difference. I'd rather see this reality show on the air doing some actual good than watch "Undercover Boss" or "The Apprentice," both shows that purport to make a difference but act as little more than hour-long advertisements.

Posted by: doom at October 6, 2010 4:11 PM

I'm happy the show focused more on the social aspects of the schools renovation than the physical construction. One of the many things that makes me say loud and profane things while watching TV are makeover shows that misrepresent construction. You CANNOT build a good structure in 24 hours, no matter how people work on. Concrete cures in a certain time, and that time cannot be helped along enough to build in less than about a week. Mortar has to set, walls have to be plumb and straight, paint actually has to dry.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at October 6, 2010 4:21 PM

I'm with doom in that I appreciate reality TV if it is trying to accomplish something meaningful, however inconsequential the results in the long run. And I don't mean things like Biggest Loser, which creates a completely unrealistic set of expectations for daily life. I mean shows like this and Home Makeover that at least get the ball rolling. There will be other issues that need addressing, but at least they've got a start.

I don't know that I've ever sounded that optimistic, let alone on this site. I think I need to lie down.

Posted by: KatSings at October 6, 2010 4:56 PM

We can't "fix" the educational system. Almost nothing ever get fixed permanently. We can only improve and maintain, assess the good and the bad from the change, and then in the future maybe improve and maintain again. Hopefully this show has given the school system and the community the knowledge that it is possible to improve things, and some of the tools the community needs to make that happen.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at October 6, 2010 5:38 PM

Cynic :-)

Points fair and well made as always, but I’m open to anything that shines a beam (however narrowly focussed) on crumbling education infrastructure. It may not tackle all the questions but if it draws an audience to at least ask the vital questions, it’s a start. I’ll give it a shot.

Posted by: Punxsutawny Phil at October 6, 2010 7:02 PM

It’s great that someone donated projectors for every classroom, but are they also going to donate the $100 replacement bulbs for them for the next twenty years?

Hopefully they learn that after this, they can start approaching tech billionaires and have them donate money, $100 million at a time. Much more realistic, I think.

Posted by: SaBrina at October 6, 2010 7:11 PM

SaBrina, I think that's the completely wrong approach. Even though this show may not do much at once (i.e. the other schools in the district that are unfixed, long term maintenance costs), it takes the right approach by getting the community to take responsibility. No matter how many tech billionaires throw money at schools (I'm looking at you, Zuckerberg), it's not going to make people show up to PTA meetings, pay attention to school board elections, vote for school bonds or make local businesspeople understand that their labor pool is coming from those shitty schools. People who use schools have to take care of schools before gifts will make a difference.

Posted by: Ficas at October 6, 2010 7:41 PM

Love Jacob owning Steven's offhand comment about him.

Pure gold.

I always enjoy when the creative types producing the content interact with the hoi polloi at Pajiba.

Makes it feel more real somehow.

Posted by: Peter G at October 6, 2010 9:51 PM

I can't imagine they get too deep in the repairs. You scratch below two paint layers on pretty much any school built before the 80's your hitting asbestos, lead paint, and PCB's. And pretty much the New York school system has painfully shown, its a hell of a lot cheaper and safer to leave that stuff in place.

Posted by: Diablo at October 6, 2010 10:46 PM

I also think that 'ship shaping' generally tastes like a false victory - but then again, when it comes to something approached like this - engaging the people who use the place, creating points of community interaction, and most of all - doing it in front of little kids and on their behalf - well, I'll take it.

The new thinking (I've heard) is that it's all about 'modeling' for kids - they do as adults what they have seen done in their childhood. The action could carry forth in great ways, and likely beyond those walls. Teaching a pattern of making something happen and using initiative is a fantastic thing. The rest of the adults have worked on something they can act to maintain...it's kinda cool.

Baby steps are still steps.

Posted by: replica at October 6, 2010 11:17 PM

Peter G >> Agreed. I got a big kick out of Jacob's appearance as well.

SLW >> Nice job as always!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 7, 2010 12:12 PM

I think this School Pride show rocks... I believe the appearance of the school matters a lot when it comes to the students. Beautiful building makes them more comfortable and safe. The good thing I like that you have mentioned is the labor provided by the community. The Bayahihan spirit is always an inspiring to me.

Posted by: Katrina at October 7, 2010 9:00 PM

I read your article and enjoyed a few of your points. However, I am from the city of Compton and was one of the volunteers during School Pride week -- I was there every day. I thought it'd be good for you to hear from someone inside the community.

A lot of people don't know about the changes that have actually been slowly taking place in the city of Compton for a number of years. I have lived and worked here since 1994, and I have been very encouraged by what's happening here. So much so that, as a photographer, I started a blog about it this year. Please check it out to get the real story -- www.OtherSideOfCompton.com. It's more than I can explain here but the blog will tell you a lot.

School Pride knew very little of what they were undertaking when they showed up here. Being behind the scenes that week was a very interesting experience. Since 2006, there is an initiative of folks partnering from both in and outside Compton to restore the city. (www.justdogood.org) Had NBC come and the Compton Initiative not existed, there is no way they could have gathered the volunteer army they needed to pull off what they did. Because they partnered with the Initiative from the beginning, it was possible. That story, from what I understand, ended up on the editing floor. However, NBC did learn a lot. From what I've been told, the school projects they've taken on since have been just that -- projects, as opposed to entire schools.

Yes, the principal was mis-managing the school and is now gone. The new principal of Enterprise has come from Compton's Laurel Elementary that currently has the highest academic performance indexes of any Compton Elementary ever, and one which blows away the scores of any suburban school around. At 888, it's probably one of the highest in the state. (That elementary would be one of the 7 close schools you mentioned, a school that was renovated by the Compton Initiative at the same time School Pride was being filmed. Some of those other 7 schools have been renovated as well.)

Anyway, I'm all for real, deep change over slapping just some fresh paint on top of the buildings. No doubt that paint alone is not enough. However, sometimes I get so sick of all the negativity. Frankly, how much time have you and your readers spent painting a run-down school? Mentoring kids? If everyone served as much as we criticize, shows like School Pride would have no staying power.

Still, I'll take a freshly painted painted school for our kids any day, over a school that looks like a prison. A surface change is not everything, but it's something. And surface change or not -- it makes a difference to the kids. Laurel's test scores were up 115 pts last year after their renovation, success the principal attributed to those surface changes. She's far too kind -- the real credit goes to her and her staff. But did the aesthetics affect the student's learning? Absolutely. Statistics consistently show that when a school's facility starts being taken care of, test scores go up.

And BTW, I visited Enterprise 2 wks ago, and was pleasantly surprised by how good the school STILL looks. They are working hard to take care of what they've been given.

Posted by: Tonya at October 11, 2010 7:45 PM

I was delighted to discover pajiba a few weeks ago and appreciate the refreshing perspective from the fawning praise showered upon nearly everything (it seems, sometimes) that crosses in front of a camera. Is it typical for the reviewer to set his or her comments out free into the world without engaging in conversation with those who comment? Is Pajima about hit and run strikes on your topic - going into hiding when reader contributes thoughts, words, emotions that enhance the discussion and might even enlighten you?

Posted by: Margaret Shore at October 16, 2010 2:13 AM