web
counter
 

extrasRome.jpg


Roman Tragedy and British Comedy, Together Again

“Rome” and “Extras” / The TV Whore
January 12, 2007

TV Reviews | January 12, 2007 | Comments (27)


“Rome” isn’t like its dramatic HBO brethren — it’s not as dense as “Deadwood,” nor as layered as “The Wire,” nor as addictive as “The Sopranos.” Nevertheless, it’s a ridiculously good show. But most folks don’t know this, because it seems that the vast majority of people either haven’t bothered to watch it at all or started to watch but gave up after being bored and/or confused. Truth be told, I was almost in that second category. When I first started watching the show, I couldn’t quite follow who all the senators were, I didn’t really get what was going on between Pompey and Caesar, and something just felt drudgingly slow about the pacing of it all. But I stuck with it, as I generally do with HBO fare, and sumbitch if something didn’t click around episode five. Suddenly, I was getting those finer points that were a bit hazy to me before, and I was absolutely loving all of it. Having just re-watched the first season again, in preparation for Sunday night’s second season premiere, I found it even more enjoyable the second time around (because I was able to follow all the intricacies right from the get-go).

For those who haven’t seen it, the premise of the show basically boils down to this: The first season followed Caesar’s rise to, and fall from, power, and this second season will watch the Roman Republic start to become the Roman Empire (although, depending on your interpretation, an argument can be made that the show has already entered the era of the Roman Empire). Of course, while the premise boils down into that nice little sentence, the devil, as they say, is in the details. And that’s where “Rome” really shines. Watching the various political factions vie for control of the Republic/Empire is fascinating (and even a little educational!). More enjoyable, and slightly voyeuristic, is the ancient Roman soap opera between the patrician (i.e., rich and elite) families, which is, of course, intricately woven with the political battles.

The first hour of season two (which premiers Sunday night, January 14, at 9 p.m.) picks up right where these storylines left off — the show’s very first shot, in fact, is of Caesar’s mutilated body still sprawled across the senate floor. If you know anything of the Roman history following Caesar’s death, little in this first hour will surprise you, as it merely sets the gears in motion for Caesar’s successors to start taking power. And I suspect that, knowing most of what happens on the political side of things, there will be little in the way of surprise (assuming the show continues to stay relatively accurate). Although, with this being the show’s final season, it will be interesting to see how far down the timeline they take things. In any event, knowledge of what’s to come doesn’t make it any less interesting or intriguing and, for me at least, it actually makes the show slightly better by lending an almost morose air of inevitability to things (much as the final episodes of season one had, leading up to the assassination).

Of course, the political and power struggles are really secondary here. The true genius of “Rome” has been the decision to make the heart of the show two plebeians (i.e., the non-rich and non-elite), the brooding Lucius Vorenus and the boorish Titus Pullo. We first met them as simple soldiers in Caesar’s feared 13th Legion, men who had been away from home for eight years while fighting Caesar’s war against the Gauls. Through the course of the first season, we watched Vorenus struggling with his forced upward mobility and, even harder for the man, learning how to reconnect with his family. Pullo, meanwhile, took an ugly downward spiral, culminating with several murders and his near-execution. But it was the intricacies of the two men’s journey and the friendship that formed between them that held the show together on its most basic emotional level. Plus, because the Fates seem to favor them both, Titus and Lucius frequently found themselves just off-center of the greater historical moments and political/power machinations taking place around them, adding a common-man perspective and influence to many of these moments.

With season two, it’s clear that Pullo and Vorenus’ journey is not over, although the men appear to be on decidedly different paths. Things have taken an ugly turn for Lucius following his wife’s balcony plunge. While he appears to be falling, Titus is trying to climb back up by establishing a grounded life for himself, which includes trying to reconnect with his now-freed slave (which happens to give us the best line of the hour — “I know I didn’t get us started off on the right foot, killing your man and all, and I’m sorry for that”). From things I’ve read and seen, I know that both of their stories are going to get rather dark and will also delve even more into the Roman criminal world than last season. And while it’s exciting to see how the political side of things play out, even having the knowledge of what’s to come, it’s even more exciting to have no idea what’s really in store for our Titus and Lucius.

The point of it all is this: If you were one of the few who stuck with season one, this second and final season has started out strong and looks like it won’t disappoint. Ave Roma! (Oh, and for the record, try not to let an ancient Roman ever put a curse on you — for those keeping track, the curses are winning 3-1 right now, with only Atia surviving, so far, the curse on her head.)

And after an hour of blood, treachery and tragedy, it would be nice to have something on the lighter side of things. Which is why, I suspect, HBO has chosen to follow “Rome” with the second series of “Extras” (also premiering on Sunday, January 14, at 10 p.m.). Now I know a lot of folks were somewhat disappointed with the first series, and this is largely due to great expectations. If you went in expecting something of “The Office“‘s caliber, of course you were going to be disappointed. Ricky Gervais will never again bottle that fire, and he knows it. But taken solely on its own, “Extras” was a fine entertainment. The strongest element of the show was frequently the fantastic guest appearances (Patrick Stewart and Kate Winslet were nothing short of brilliant). Now, however, things seem to be clicking a bit more and Andy (Gervais), his stumbling friend Maggie, and his woefully incompetent agent all provide several hilarious moments. In fact, I laughed just as much during the first episode of “Extras” as I did during last night’s great episode of “The Office.”

It may seem like I’m giving “Extras” considerably short shrift compared to the lengthy discussion about “Rome,” and that would be correct. Truth is, there’s just not much to say about the show. It’s funny, and the writing appears to be tighter and stronger than in the first go-round. And yes, there are more guest stars — Orlando Bloom had a great role in the opener, and the clips I’ve seen of David Bowie, Daniel Radcliffe, and Ian McKellan all look outstanding. In fact, I think the show’s taglines sum things up pretty well. The first season’s tag was “The story of a man with small parts.” This season, which follows Andy as he puts his BBC comedy together, is “The parts are bigger, but they’re over exposed.” And there you have it.


theTVwhore.jpg


Seth Freilich is Pajiba’s television columnist. If he had lived in ancient Rome, he would have liked to have owned a dwarf slave because, like Marc Antony, he would have found the dwarf amusing. But he doesn’t find dwarves presently amusing — that would be wrong. Only Ancient Roman TV Whore finds dwarves amusing. Right then.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Miss Potter | Pajiba Love 01/12/07









Comments

Season 2 of Extras is all about Stephen Merchant in the character of the world's worst agent.
Daniel Radcliffe is probably the best used guest star - there's an utterly genius moment involving yet another guest star and himself.
The funniest sequence involving a guest is definately either Keith Cheguin - I'm sure the American's will have no clue as to who he is - and Chris Martin from Coldplay
Alot of the cringe jokes are pure Larry David in Curb in how they are set up.
The season also has a really nice ending.

Posted by: PyD at January 12, 2007 11:55 AM

Season 1 of "Rome" is on sale at Best Buy this week for $60, and, for those of us without HBO, the purchase of any HBO dvd set gets you a free copy of a disc with the Season 2 premiere. And no, I don't work for Best Buy, but I don't have HBO so I took advantage and spent a little Christmas money. Just thought I'd share. And good call, it is a fantastic show if you stick with it.

Posted by: Cody at January 12, 2007 12:01 PM

Seth, you are dead on about watching the first season of "Rome" when it aired. I too was confused about the senators and what the patrician families had to do with one another (especially Atia's place in the story for the first few episodes) while following Titus and Lucius' stories gave me a break from trying to piece 23 different names and plotlines together. For this reason, it is mandatory that you watch the first season twice. Think of it like a second visit to a nice restaurant where you ordered your favorite meal but didn't have a chance to enjoy it because you had 16 different servers and fought with your spouse all the way through, and you know you need to go back and try again, preferably during lunch on a Sunday where one person is serving and you can enjoy the meal and the ambiance of the place.

Oh, and in case anyone is wondering why HBO is ending the series after only 22 episodes, each episode costs a fortune to create and the bigwigs up-on-high can't afford their crystal bathtubs and porcelain H3's if they continue to make great television shows. The fuckers.

Posted by: Kballs at January 12, 2007 12:05 PM

Love the ROME love. The characters are full-bodied and complex, and the story lines are entertaining. I am so disappointed that this season is the end of it all.

And I think you meant "first SEASON" not first SERIES" in the beginning of your paragraph on Extras.

Posted by: sarah at January 12, 2007 12:21 PM

Hee hee...full-bodied characters. Why does that sound so funny? I guess I have a dirty mind. Lucius Vorenus is definitely delicious...mmm...I'm getting all excited about this season! Whew.

Posted by: AM at January 12, 2007 12:29 PM

Sarah - I did mean "series," as that's what the Brits refer to their comedy seasons as.

Posted by: TV Whore at January 12, 2007 12:34 PM

Yup, I came thisclose to giving up on "Rome" last season, too. Lots of people with lots of odd names, lots of story threads to follow....but all with the hallmark of great HBO series....profanity, violence and sex!!! So, I hung in there and I am damn glad I did. How many times do you get to see ancient Roman brain surgery? Cleopatra as a drug-addicted, teenage, pre-Christian slut (a la La Lohan)? Really, really brilliant TV. And, it is easy to see why it costs a bloody fortune. Everything looks so authentic--grungy, ancient and REAL. And, the actors are all BRILLIANT. Looking forward to the premiere (thank God for Tivo---BF will be watching Rome while I tune in for Bauer Power) but dreading the end. Where, oh where for art thou, Deadwood?

Posted by: dammitjanet at January 12, 2007 12:49 PM

It must be said that while the first season on Extras may not have been laugh-out-loud funny for Americans, it was that and more so for those of us who grew up where we could get all of the references. The first ep of Season 1 featured Ross Kemp (former Eastenders star) and there's a line in it where Maggie says he's handsome and Andy responds "Handsome: he looks like Zippy from Rainbow". I don't remember the rest of the episode: I was laughing so hard, my dog and husband thought there was something wrong with me physically. I really relished those moments by the way because those of us who have transplanted to the US are constantly bombarded by US pop culture references that we don't get. I had a boss who once described me as having "zero sense of humour" on a year-end review because I didn't laugh at some joke that required a familiarity with a show called "My Three Sons". So season 1 of Extras was payback time for me.
Rome is brilliant: not as brilliant (and I mean that in the real sense of the word, not the Brit-sense) as Deadwood, but easily the best thing out there right now.

Posted by: Siobhan at January 12, 2007 3:59 PM

Ahw come on, Extras deserves more than that tiny paragraph!
This show is funny and poignant and makes me actually care about the characters.

Posted by: Sunsneezer at January 12, 2007 4:16 PM

I am one of the few who loved Rome right from the beggining, although that is possibly because I chose to study Ancient Rome, as well as Ancient Greece, in post-secondary school. Although I agree that at first the sheer amount of characters (and the fact that the lesser senators all kind of look like each other) was confusing, the show definitely improved in the second half of the season.

Realizing that this is the final season, does anyone know how far it will go? I heard a rumour that it would end with Octavian as the Emperor...so I'm just wondering if this season is going to focus on the whole Marc Antony/Cleopatra/Octavia/Octavian side of things...any suggestions?

Posted by: KDM at January 12, 2007 4:21 PM

Extras series 2 is Ricky Gervais at his best. Ian McKellen was hilarious "You do know that I'm not a REAL wizard, right?" and Daniel Radcliff and the "Jimmy" moment on the bus was classic ("*MAY* I have my jimmy back?") The best part of this show is the chance the guest stars get to make an absolute parody of themselves, and it works. Sam Jackson was way underused tho.

Posted by: Haggis at January 12, 2007 5:08 PM

It's interesting to read that others had a hard time sorting through characters in early S1 of Rome. I did too, but I thought that was mainly because I have a middling case of prosapagnosia (aka face blindness), to the point where even Lucius and Titus were indistinguishable to me for several episodes (all bulky white guys with short hair look the same to me, and if you're over fifty, male and wearing a suit, all bets are off). Those freaking togas really reduce people to a faceless soup for me. Thank God I had a viewing partner to help guide me, and that I knew the history--names and events were helpful signposts, and after about five shows, it all fell into place.

They can't get S2 onto DVD fast enough.

Posted by: ranylt at January 12, 2007 8:03 PM

I absolutely love both of theese shows...
Just for refrence, one of the previews for Rome made it sound like the second season will end with the Battle of Philippi, but I'm not positive.

Posted by: Victoria at January 12, 2007 11:07 PM

*SPOILERSPOILERSPOILERSPOILER*

Well, not really a spoiler in that if you don't already know Julius C. was killed by his own men, you've got some problems. However, people may not know how the season closes. Anyway, my husband and I watched the final episode. I thought the scene where everybody killed Caesar was one of the most brutal things I've ever seen. Jesus.

Posted by: Samantha T at January 13, 2007 9:28 AM

Victoria -

The same CNN article that informed me this was the final season of Rome also told me how it ends. I could post it but I don't want to be a little bitchy spoiler even though I personally don't think it was much of one.

Read this article if you really want to know (possible spoiler):

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/01/10/apontv.lindsayduncan.ap/index.html

(Interview with Lindsay Duncan, aka Servilia

Posted by: ranylt at January 13, 2007 9:29 AM

Being a huge fan of The Office UK, and not to mention that just yesterday I spent the bulk of my day cracking up to The Ricky Gervais Show podcasts for the umpteenth time... I really think it's past due that I watch Extras on DVD. No wait... as of this immediate writing, it is now moved to the top of my Netflix queue.

Part of the reason I haven't seen it yet is because I too, had heard similar reviews; that it didn't live up to The Office and so on. On the other hand, going by the fact that I will die laughing just hearing Ricky Gervais utter the phrase "Monkey News?" Thinking it won't be a problem.

Posted by: litelysalted at January 13, 2007 2:56 PM

Rome is better than Deadwood and the Sopranos has been a yawnfest for years now. Pity this is the last season, there's so much Roman Empire history the show could last twenty seasons changing casts as it moves along the little eras.

If only...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 13, 2007 5:25 PM

Wait, I've only watched two episodes of Rome-Season 1 on DVD... Caesar DIES???? Thanks a lot Whore, thanks a lot. Just kidding. I agree that knowing some of the real history (or at least, what I can remember from my 9th grade Ancient History Class with Mr. Hutchins) does add to the ominous feel of events and the inevitability of the characteres' plights. Cool so far, I'll definitely keep watching.

Posted by: Go Big Red at January 15, 2007 2:35 PM

A great way to watch season one is through HBO on-demand, if the episodes are still available. I haven't looked recently. You can have your own Rome marathon and fast-forward through those insanely long opening credits.

Posted by: Persephone at January 15, 2007 5:52 PM

"When I first started watching the show, I couldn't quite follow who all the senators were..."

This is the reason the show has not been renewed (in addition to the colossal cost, but come on, how much are they paying James Gandolfini?).

My wife has a political history degree and I had to ask her questions every 5 minutes ("who's that guy? What'd that guy say when I said who's that guy?"). Even the educated film critic has to rewatch to figure things out. So how on earth can we expect people who can't follow My Name Is Earl (which I still love, no hate here) with the voiceover explaining the whole plot and the moral, to follow Rome? Hell, I even have trouble keeping track of all the I-talians on the Sopranos and I graduated college!

As Arrested Development went, so goes Rome. Long live the empire!

Posted by: Noel at January 16, 2007 12:49 AM

I watched some of the "Rome" episodes the other day with a girl I had bought "I,Claudius" by Robert Graves for. It took the entire first episode for it to sink in that Atia was not Livia from that book and that Rome was taking places around fifty years prior to I,Claudius. My guess is that one of the reasons why they are calling a halt to the show is that after Octavian becomes Augustus, there will be a relatively calm period up until around the time of his death which would put them squarely in I,Claudius territory. I would love for them to do that, of course, but I wouldn't want to be the one to try to follow up on Jacobi, Hurt & Co. performances.

To be fair though, I got a kick out of explaining all that was going on, how the senate worked, who the characters were etcetera. It did show, in spades, just how confusing those first few episodes could be for someone who hadn't already studied the subject. Also, the show was packed with little asides that delighted classical studies weenies like myself.

As regrets go, I think they should have started earlier in the Republic in the Sulla and Gaius Marius days when Pompey and Julius were young and had Crassus as a character. They could have had the Cataline conspiracy as a plot. That would have been great.

Posted by: imk at January 16, 2007 11:26 AM

I maintain that Extras is as funny as The Office - and I LOVE The Office.

Posted by: Samantha T at January 16, 2007 9:24 PM

Imagine how good this show would get when they got to Caligula and Nero.

Posted by: Caius at January 20, 2007 4:00 PM

Maybe I'm wrong, but I distinctly remember reading an article lamenting the fact that "Deadwood" was cut short of its fully envisioned 4 season run. In it, the writer claimed that "Rome" was pre-planned to only have 2 seasons and that's why HBO agreed to take a gamble on such a costly show that would most likely go over people's heads if they didn't pay attention, like most mainstream TV watchers do. But maybe I'm wrong.

Anyway, if you enjoy "Rome", I would recommend Conn Iggulden's "The Emperor" trilogy. In the same vein as the show, Iggulden's writes fictionalized novels about Caesar's life, with all the same players and some new ones. It goes into detail and spans almost all of Caesar's lifetime, focusing mainly on him and his war effort alongside his personal relationships. Great read! Also, prepped me for understanding "Rome".

Posted by: bmg at January 23, 2007 12:31 AM

Season 1 of Rome was very difficult at first. Very good call. But absolutely worth it, and frankly, better than last seasons Sopranos.
I think Rome works because of 2 characters - Antony, Pullo & Vorenus. Every scene these guys are in are just amazing. Please give this one a second try if you quit out of frustration. My husband hated Rome for an entirely different reason - the Brits liberal use of slang words (cunny - ew - lovely, etc). I'll admit it was a little bit strange at first, but now it doesn't bug me at all.

Posted by: jp at January 23, 2007 2:19 PM

Obviously I meant 3 characters, please forgive.

Posted by: jp at January 23, 2007 2:20 PM

The Titus and Lucius characters are a brilliant mechanism for linking the historical stuff to the modern audience. The viewer can, depending on the scene, either relate in with Titus and vicariously enjoy all the fighting and fucking or be uptight and grumble along with Lucius about the injustice of it all.
So either way you feel, you end up having an emotional investment in what is happening. Great writing, really.

Posted by: imk at January 23, 2007 3:34 PM