blogspot
visitor
Life On Mars | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

lifeonmars.jpg

Gotta Get Back … in Time


“Life on Mars” / Sarah Carlson

TV Reviews | October 16, 2008 | Comments (23)


Doc Brown warned us about this.

You can really screw things up when you travel through time, especially if you run into a past version of yourself, but the potential to change history is too great a draw not to try. It’s all fiction, of course, but it’s a fiction people love to imagine, a fish-out-of-water experience that let’s us wonder what it’d be like to step backward or forward in time, even just for a few minutes.

The latest pop culture piece to attempt to bring us this theory is ABC’s “Life on Mars,” a creative but mind-bending TV show in which a New York City detective, Sam Tyler (Jason O’Mara), in 2008 is hit by a car and knocked unconscious, only to wake up in 1973. That is, part of him wakes up there. Disappointingly, “Life on Mars” really isn’t about time travel because it doesn’t follow any of the fake but necessary rules to make the theory work, flying DeLorean or magic phone booth or no.

Sam in ‘08 was chasing a potential murderer who might have had as a hostage his girlfriend and fellow detective, Maya (Lisa Bonet), when he was hit by a car as he stepped out of his on a New York street. The last song playing on his in-car iPod? David Bowie’s “Life on Mars,” a helpful reason to send Sam back to ‘73 and present a Time Life collection of 70s hits as a backdrop for all the polyester, misogynism and bad hair.

His ‘08 self is in a coma, which his ‘73 self soon figures out by receiving “messages” through TVs and radios that represent what his coma self is hearing — his doctor explaining Sam is in a vegetative state, his girlfriend telling his coma self that she’s OK. Sam thinks he’s dreaming, but he can’t get over how real the details of ‘73 are, and soon, he’s helping solve a murder with his new ‘73 squad that has ties to a murder he was just working on in ‘08. So … he’s in an alternate reality? This is where my brain started hurting.

Putting pieces together with the ease a “CSI” detective solves a crime by looking through a microscope, Sam in ‘73 learns that his ‘08 killer, Colin Raimes, was neighbors with the ‘73 killer, Willy Kramer. Sam talks with the kid version of Colin, learning that Colin looked up to Willy and was angry about his arrest. Sam guesses that older Colin was paying homage to Willy with his crimes, and in what could have been an insanely dark moment, he considers shooting young Colin to stop future murders, only to back down.

This is where things really don’t work: You can’t interact in the past with people you know in the future, unless you want to change events and potentially make the world explode, or something. If he were actually in the past, he could try and make a difference in the boy’s life to prevent him from growing up to kill people, but he seems to be in an alternate universe. So what’s the point? If he can’t actually change the past because he’s not in it, then how does it affect his future, which is really his present, which he’s in right now, as well as being in the past? Crap.

“Mars,” a remake of a 2006 BBC series, does its best to be a quirky mix of mystery and cop procedural and does an adequate job of generating interest in characters and plot, an impressive cast lending support to its tone and message — Harvey Keitel as the rules-shunning lieutenant, Gretchen Mol as the lone feathered-haired policewoman referred to as “No Nuts,” Michael Imperioli as some asshole detective. O’Mara is appealing as the dumbstruck Sam whom no one actually believes is from a different era, but Sam was given the gamut of emotions to sprint through in 44 minutes, making it hard to actually know what he’s like, much less why one of his selves in stuck in 1973.

“Mars” falls into the category of shows I can’t imagine developing beyond a single season. The pilot’s pacing was a bit fast, and the viewer is thrown into the alternate world just as quickly as Sam is. We’re just as confused, but fortunately for us, we’re not stuck there. The mystery isn’t significant enough to capture fans as, say, “Lost”— another show that doesn’t quite make sense, but with style. Mild curiosity will bring me back for a second or third episode, as will the likability of Sam and Mol’s Annie, but viewers need to know that the mystery is one worth waiting for, and soon.

Apparently, the key to liking the show is to not take its metaphysics remotely seriously. A quick scan of reviews show most critics enjoyed “Mars,” with one New York Times writer saying it “exhumes a raunchier, dirtier, more dangerous New York City, the one depicted in Serpico, Mean Streets and, most recently, American Gangster.” Raunchy? Dirty? Really? Maybe for broadcast TV, or maybe we should all chip in and buy the first season of “The Wire” and mail it to the Times.

“Life on Mars” isn’t dark or dangerous in reality. Well, maybe in an alternate one. It comes closer to being mindless entertainment.

“Life on Mars” airs at 10/9c Thursdays on ABC.

Sarah Carlson has a front-row seat to the decline of the newspaper industry and lives in Alabama with her overly excitable Welsh Corgi.


Cameron Crowe Untitled Film | Home by Marilynne Robinson





Comments

Wait, he's in a coma and that is what sends him (or part of him) back in time?
Mkay. Was there just a lot of 35-year-old wardrobe around and this is an excuse to use it?
I saw a promo for it and thought the "zinger" was crap.
Sam: I need my cell!
Cop: What? What are you gonna sell?

Hoo-wee! That is some funny shit! Keep those word puns coming, guys. It's not like I get to talk to my grandfather on the phone enough these days.

Posted by: Sharon at October 16, 2008 10:09 AM

Even though I've seen, and am a fan of, the original, I figured I'd give this a shot. The only thing that I learned is that Americans take British TV and fuck it inside out.

Also, I thought the WTC shots were a little tacky. They clubbed me over the head with dozens of other details screaming "It's 1973!" I really didn't need to see the Towers.

Posted by: Nicole at October 16, 2008 10:18 AM

Sharon, blame the NYPD for calling their low-level employees officers instead of constables.

Posted by: Adere at October 16, 2008 10:19 AM

I've only seen the UK version, and not for a while, but wasn't one of the mysteries of that series whether he actually was in a coma or not? They never came out and said it directly, (if I remember right) and it was trying to work out whether he was in fact dead, in a coma, or had time travelled that made it so engrossing. We were given snippets of info - Sam heard things that suggested he was in hospital, but if they've come right out and said he's in a coma in the US version, then what's the point? There is no mystery.

Just typing this has given me a headache. Best not to think about it.

Posted by: Carrie at October 16, 2008 10:23 AM

I haven't seen this version yet, only the (really good) BBC version. But I'm not sure even Keitel can equal the impression Glenister made with the character of Gene Hunt.

Did BritSam think about killing the kid, too? I can't remember.

Posted by: Tarn at October 16, 2008 10:31 AM

Can we all chip in and buy Me the first season of the Wire? I promise I'll use the money you saved me on women and booze.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at October 16, 2008 10:33 AM

I watched S1 of the original BBC series, and enjoyed it thoroughly. I knew when I first heard about this project that U.S. network TV was going to pull all its teeth and make it boring. The short clips I've seen online showed me the lead actor is infuriatingly dull. Not even Harvey Keitel is enough to make me watch--if he can't cuss, what's the point?

Posted by: Jerce at October 16, 2008 10:33 AM

Carrie, you're right. That ambiguity made the whole first series of the UK show. That and Philip Glenister.

Unfortunately someone on the A.V. Club accidentally spoiled me about the outcome. Less inclined to watch season two now.

Posted by: Adere at October 16, 2008 10:34 AM

Did BritSam think about killing the kid, too? I can't remember.

It was strongly implied in a brief moment, mostly with good acting and a little camera editing--things American TV apparently hasn't got a handle on yet.

Posted by: Jerce at October 16, 2008 10:36 AM

"... his girlfriend and fellow detective, Maya (Lisa Bonet)..."

OOOOOOOF... aaaaaah...see, there's your problem right there.

Not on my Aquos.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 16, 2008 10:40 AM

Oh fuck, Harvey. WHY?

Posted by: bucdaddy at October 16, 2008 10:42 AM

Adere, that's a shame, (hate people who spoil things) but the very end of series two is well worth watching. John Simm is so good in that role. And Philip Glenister was amazing as Hunt. Less amazing in Ashes to Ashes, sadly. They should have left it alone.

Posted by: Carrie at October 16, 2008 11:05 AM

"Disappointingly, "Life on Mars" really isn't about time travel because it doesn't follow any of the fake but necessary rules to make the theory work, flying DeLorean or magic phone booth or no."

Ah BUT -- In the British version of "Life On Mars" Sam Tyler was played by John Simm, who was also The Master on Dr. Who. So, by association, time travel and a flying telphone police box were involved.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 16, 2008 11:07 AM

Lisa Bonet is still alive?

Posted by: Admin11 at October 16, 2008 11:08 AM

Lisa Bonet is still alive?

Posted by: Admin11 at October 16, 2008 11:08 AM

-------------------------------------------

Unfortunately

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 16, 2008 11:19 AM

I enjoyed season one of the original, and had no interest watching the US version, but my husband did - so we watched. I thought the first episode was pretty much all style, without substance or good acting. I'd put this in the category of Eli Stone: something I never want to see again.

Posted by: CIndy at October 16, 2008 11:23 AM

Sigh. Is the British version EVER going to come out on region 1 dvd (or whatever the hell region the US is)? I saw a couple episodes of the original on a trip to the UK and thus have zero interest in this shite. John Simm, where are you when I need you?

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at October 16, 2008 11:27 AM

Though I enjoyed S1 of the British version (not mentioned by any of my British friends, but lent to me by a Dutch friend!) I got annoyed by how Sam was painted as this superior modern guy, not sexist or racist like everyone around him, but when faced with sexism he said nothing about it and when faced with racism he spouted some stupid PC phrase that made no sense to anyone from the 70s. So the moral superiority was assumed rather than shown. Interesting how they will deal with this aspect in the US as I assume racism was a much bigger issue in 70s New York than in Manchester.

Posted by: ChrisD at October 16, 2008 1:35 PM

Interesting how they will deal with this aspect in the US as I assume racism was a much bigger issue in 70s New York than in Manchester.

My guess is either very shallowly or not at all. The only time racism is ever brought up on broadcast TV is in comedy (see "The Office") or one character who's an asshole anyway (paging Gregory House) and offends everyone.

Posted by: Nicole at October 16, 2008 1:41 PM

Carrie, leaving a good thing alone does not rhyme with moneymoneymoney.

The idea of Ashes to Ashes sounded like a Children In Need Special to me. I don't care for that.

Posted by: Adere at October 16, 2008 1:42 PM

This show doesn't have The Guv aka Philip Glenister so what's the point?

Life on Mars here in the UK only had 2 series before it was wrapped up and that's definitely the way it should go. So of course the U.S. will drag that shit on for at least 5.

Posted by: amanda at October 17, 2008 7:02 AM

I agree with the above comments - not knowing if Sam is alive/dead/in a coma made the UK series better. And you're right, Amanda - 2 seasons was just long enough - any longer and the premise would have gotten stale.

As for the sexism, you get the feeling that the Guv would be just as sexist in this day & age as he was then. It's part of his (kind of awesome) genetic makeup. He's a do-gooder at heart, so you can't hate him for it, which I think was partly the point.

The 'Whaaa...there's no INTERNET?' / 'Affirmative Action? What are you on about?' shtick was used so sparingly and effectively in the UK series, I really, really hope that they keep it to a minimum here...

Though I will keep my hope alive for Michael 'Christofah' Imperioli. I've thought for a while now that he's such a good actor that people don't realize that he's actually playing outside type - they think he actually is a Jersey guido in real life. It's not typecasting per se, it's more than that. But the man has cred. Dude did Steppenwolf Theater & dated Lili Taylor! C'mon!

Posted by: K at October 17, 2008 10:53 AM

I loved loved loved the BBC version, season one was weird and original and the second series really hit its stride.. Happily the beeb didn't feel the need to overdo the references to 1973, it's supposed to feel like reality, not a caricature of bad 70s memorabilia with over the top tacky and obvious reference, here's hoping they can tone it down a bit. And sadly Harvey Keitel is no match for the mighty Philip Glenister (for a start there's no nagging fear that Glenister is going to get his "lad" out at the earliest convenience) and could Keitel deliver this line so sublimely?

"I'm Gene Hunt. Your DCI. And it's 1973. Nearly dinner time. I'm 'aving hoops"

Posted by: leah at October 20, 2008 8:46 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.