web
counter
 

Apocalypse Porn

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (26)



life after people.jpg

“Welcome to Earth, Population Zero”

In January, 2008, the History Channel broadcast a heavily advertised documentary called “Life After People.” Running in a two hour time slot, it featured extensive CGI to demonstrate what would take place to the remains of human civilization if all the humans simply disappeared. The documentary was a coup for the History Channel, bringing in over 5.4 million viewers, the highest viewership in the channel’s history. They brought back the concept in 2009 as a 10 episode mini-series that episodically zoomed in on particularly interesting tidbits.

“Life After People” takes the basic premise of the end of the world, strips out all pretense of plot and characters, and films the spectacle as a documentary. It even uses the conceit of refusing to explore why or how humans might have disappeared (disease, mass suicide, the singularity, the rapture) and focuses exclusively on what would happen after us, boilerplate apocalypse. The show raises the bar for anyone who wants to pen a post-apocalyptic tale, mapping out dozens of set pieces into which intrepid survivors could be dropped.

The original documentary and show have three basic components that are mixed and matched throughout each episode: footage taken from an existing ghost town, CGI of buildings falling down, and tightly focused explorations of particularly interesting case studies. While the second component can get repetitive at times, the other two stay fresh over the course of the season.

The footage from real ghost towns helps ground the speculation in science, and has that voyeuristic charm that draws us to photo galleries online of abandoned and decaying towns. Prypiat, Ukraine, the small city a mile from Chernobyl that was abandoned quite literally overnight twenty years ago hosts a soccer field that’s become a forest, a ferris wheel set up a few days before the disaster and never used, trees growing on roofs of buildings. Each subsequent episode uses a different abandoned area: Hashima Island, the temples of Angkor, Centralia, Pennsylvania. These bits add texture to the speculation and CGI, weighing down the proceedings with the implicit warning that this isn’t just speculation, this has happened before, albeit on a smaller scale.

The weakest parts of the series is the recurring motif of giant buildings falling down. It gets a bit repetitive from episode to episode: windows break, water leaks into the foundations, beams and foundations gradually weaken without maintenance, and then one day fifty years down the road, it all comes tumbling down, repeat next week with the next famous skyscraper on the list. Though on paper it would seem to be the most exciting, it fails for the same reason that most giant disaster movies fail to strike home. It just isn’t personal enough. It’s enormous and impressive, but it just doesn’t resonate the same way as the more nuanced explorations of how smaller and more tangible bits of our civilization will fade away.

Those more focused segments are the best part of the show, zooming tightly in on particularly intriguing ways that things will go spectacularly wrong: breweries detonating as the fermentation tanks build up pressure, the New York City subway system flooding within 36 hours as pumps shut down, sandstorms slowly burying Phoenix, the colonization of skyscrapers by cats hunting birds hundreds of feet above the decaying asphalt, seagulls dying out by the millions once humans stop producing garbage.

“Life After People” reminds me of how the best part of The Stand was the first few hundred pages as we watched the world disintegrate without us, watched the entire Rube Goldberg edifice of our civilization tumble as the clockwork tripped without our hands. There’s an entire sub-genre of horror and science fiction premised on the exploration of the apocalypse. When Michael Bay and Roland Emmerich get on board it’s naturally idiotic, but like all genre memes, when it’s done good, it’s done really good. If part of the appeal of horror is the thrill of our own mortality, there is something in armageddon fiction that whispers to us about the mortality of our entire species.

There’s something pornographic about it, the appeal of raw spectacle. Tension and veiled references aren’t enough, we want to see the details on the screen. Apocalypse fiction doesn’t work subtly, if it was horror or porn it’d be banned in the South. We want to watch the camera linger luridly as nature ravages our civilization’s corpse back into dust.

The show alternately stresses permanence and impermanence as themes. We stored records of human DNA on the “Immortality Drive” on the International Space Station, explicitly so that if we were wiped out by something, then if someone or something else ever came along with the brains to figure it out, we might live again in some form. Hilariously though, without humans the space station would burn up in the atmosphere within a few years. Within 10,000 years, virtually no trace would remain of our civilization, but plastic Mardi Gras beads would endure in the soil essentially forever. “Life After People” works best when highlighting the tragic fragility of our greatest accomplishments and the stubborn persistence of many of our most trivial.

If you are into science fiction or those particular strains of horror that obsess over the hungry curiosity at being the last person left on Earth, “Life After People” is a truly enthralling show.

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com.









Pajiba Love 09/16/09 | The Ten Strangest Film Debuts of A-Listers













Comments

Now might be a splendid time to mention the organization I belong to: VHEMT, The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement. "May we live long and die out."

Posted by: vercordio at September 16, 2009 2:04 PM

I wonder if an alien civilization could figure out from the topography of a city that an intelligent (relatively speaking) species lived here, of if they'd think Earth naturally had hills every 100 feet separated by streams that ran in a grid.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at September 16, 2009 2:09 PM

Posted by: oskar at September 16, 2009 2:23 PM

The whole series is based on the scientifically-minded book "The World Without Us" by Alan Weisman. I'd highly recommend it.

Posted by: jensauce at September 16, 2009 2:25 PM

@ oskar

Wow. I'm burning through the thesaurus to find a word that properly balances 'hard-core' with 'sociopath' and 'hermit'.

That guy is unreal.

Posted by: strtwise at September 16, 2009 2:40 PM

We watched the 2 hr. documentary which was interesting enough. But a 10 part mini-series is stretching the premise too far. In the original show the only part that really got to me was when it showed all the poor doggies trapped in houses and apartments with no food or water, waiting for their people to come home. So humanity better get its act together, 'cause that stuff is just too tragic.

Posted by: april_kitty at September 16, 2009 3:07 PM

april_kitty >> I was going to mention the exact same thing! I liked the melodramatic escape of that one dog who broke through the window so that he could live out his days in a more feral existence.

A friend asked me recently what I would do if humanity died off and I was the only one left, and I said the first thing I would do would be to let as many dogs out of their houses as I could. Then perhaps I could march across the country as the leader of a dog army.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 16, 2009 3:17 PM

Great read Wilson, but I’m just not that interested in the apocalypse because it seems so far off. Maybe if someone took the initiative and brought about the apocalypse in say, 5 years, then maybe just maybe I’d be a little more interested.

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 16, 2009 3:18 PM

vercordio >> I checked out that site many years back. I found it disturbingly well-reasoned.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 16, 2009 3:19 PM

Oh dear Godtupus, I hadn't thought about the pets. I could NOT bear to watch that. And it's too bad because I was really excited about the premise. But if we're all dead, who's filming it?

Posted by: DeadBessie at September 16, 2009 3:24 PM

I can't remember where I read it, but another scientifically-geared apocalyptic piece I saw a while back dealt with the possibility of humanity's survival all the way up to the Sun's expansion. If we had not found a way to move on from this planet by then, the idea of buying extra time by trying to gradually expand the Earth's orbit through the use of gravitational influence over thousands of years (e.g., diverting asteroids and making "towboats" out of them) was discussed.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 16, 2009 3:24 PM

--“Life After People” works best when highlighting the tragic fragility of our greatest accomplishments and the stubborn persistence of many of our most trivial.--

Well said, sir.

Posted by: Meggrs at September 16, 2009 3:48 PM

I think the best way I've heard it summarized, DarthCorleone, is like this: you simply cannot debate the logic of the VHEMT movement. Having children today is completely irresponsible — that's inarguable. The problem is that you're coming up against an emotional/visceral need with logic. That never works.

I guess the ultimate question is whether or not you can overcome your primal desire to make more humans. For me, when faced with the vast number of species that go extinct every year, the continuing depletion of our natural resources, Glenn Beck/Michelle Malkin... it's a frightfully easy decision.

Posted by: vercordio at September 16, 2009 4:08 PM

@darthcorleone:

The dog thing would work only if your pack was strong enough to kill off the other dog packs roaming the streets/countryside.

It had better be or you'll end up dog food yourself.

Rover gets mean when Rover gets hungry.

Posted by: anderbot at September 16, 2009 4:11 PM

anderbot >> Oh, I'm like the Beastmaster. You better believe my dog pack is going to be strong. I'll be psychically tuned to them coordinating the battle with my superior primate intelligence that will trump anything another dog pack can muster.

And at night, my dog pack and I will hold ultimate frisbee pick-up tournaments and drink the moonshine that we've distilled. It will be a very merry time.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 16, 2009 4:36 PM

vercordio >> I just surfed the site for a little while. They've expanded it quite a bit since I last visited. I especially enjoyed the "Why breed?" table.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 16, 2009 4:40 PM

Nothing digests plastics because historically, there weren't a lot of plastics around to eat. Yet, there's lots of bacteria that eat cellulose - a different polymer.

I'm waiting for some bacterium to figure out how to unzip vinyl, not the fun way. Or one to figure out how to live in and digest hydrocarbons - oil & similar. Lots and lots of energy & building blocks in those materials. A bonanza for the first organism that figures out how to use it.

Wait a minute. A little lab work and I could be the guy who ends civilization!

Posted by: BeirceAmbrose at September 16, 2009 5:02 PM

jensauce is right, Alan Weisman's book that the show is based on is a good read. I heard the guy lecture at my Catholic university once. Though interesting overall, probably the most exciting part was when someone asked him how we could avoid using up Earth's resources, he said population control via contraceptives . . . definitely the quietest the room was the entire night. I almost started laughing at the stunned faces (yes, I'm Catholic too, just a more progressive one).

Posted by: nutmeag at September 16, 2009 5:51 PM

DarthCorleone:

Was the book that talked about moving the Earth to avoid the red supergiant phase of our sun "Death From The Skies!" by Phil Plait?

I highly recommend that book to everyone. It deals with all kinds of potential doomsday scenarios: black holes crossing our path, gamma ray bursts, big rocks slamming into Earth, the end of our sun, and even the end of the Universe itself.

Fascinating stuff.

Posted by: Casey at September 16, 2009 7:31 PM

Casey >> No, it was just some online article I read in the science & tech section of some website. But thanks for the recommendation - that sounds like a book I would enjoy!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 16, 2009 8:03 PM

At a time where climate models are only wrong by degree of severity and scientists are debating whether seas will rise by 20 feet or just 10 feet, it’s little surprise that apocalypse themes are becoming more and more prevalent.

“Life After People” …uses the conceit of refusing to explore why or how humans might have disappeared (disease, mass suicide, the singularity, the rapture) and focuses exclusively on what would happen after us”

And that puts the human mess in perspective. I love the idea that nature will keep on keeping on whether we’re here or not. Get in tune with it or pay the price.

Carlin said it best: The Planet is Fine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw
(hope the link works, I’m behind a firewall)

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at September 16, 2009 8:41 PM

Caught the miniseries and the shows that followed. You're right that the show gets too caught up in the porn of showing us big structures tumble -- the Space Needle, the Eiffel Tower, etc. But the smaller elements are the ones that really bring the idea of an Earth without us as scary.

Posted by: Fredo at September 16, 2009 11:03 PM

Currently he receives an old-age government pension ... Linkola blames humans for the continuous degradation of the environment.
---
I blame Linkola for allowing the government to allow Linkola to continue living and degrading the environment.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at September 16, 2009 11:32 PM

He thinks differently to you, but doesn't harm anyone or incite anyone to violence. Seems a bit rough, killing him.

Personally, I think if we need to turn things around 4 or 5 hundred years from now, it is going to take some pretty fucking radical steps. I won't advocate some of this guy's suggestions, but I guarantee that the shit he's talking'll seem tame when the time comes that a bowl of rice will be worth your rear-end virginity and stabbing some guy sitting next to you.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: Peter G at September 17, 2009 3:58 AM

It's said more and more celebrities have their profiles on a great millionaire dating site____W e a l t h y S o c i a l . C O M_______ . The best club for seeking the rich singles, sexy beauties and even hot celebs...You should check it out!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by: Jessie at September 17, 2009 9:17 AM

He thinks differently to you, but doesn't harm anyone or incite anyone to violence.

Really?

From the wiki article, "He advocates eugenics and genocide as possible means to combat overpopulation. He has admired Stalinist and Nazi massacres, especially The Holocaust where "six million" died by "ideally painless means"."

That sounds like a peaceful guy to me!

Posted by: Phaeolus at September 17, 2009 10:08 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time