free counter with statistics Kings Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

kings_mcshane_event_main.jpg
Don't F**king Call Me Al!


"Kings" / Dustin Rowles

TV Reviews | March 19, 2009 | Comments (32)


Lookit: There’s plenty to dislike about the new NBC drama, “Kings,” but there’s reason to cut it some slack, too. It’s a network television show that is neither a procedural, a reality show, nor a bland, laugh-track heavy sitcom. Add to that acting heavyweights Ian McShane and Dylan Baker, and at least your starting out in the black. By the end of the two-hour pilot, it’s still on the right side of the ledger, if barely. It’s just a shame that the alternate universe that “Kings” exists in relies on names and places that sound like they exist in a Biblical Sci-Fi novel, which is bewilderingly distracting in a show that otherwise seems to strive for a fictional reality.

The show — based on the David and Goliath story, intermingled with Shakespearean themes — is set in Shiloh, the capitol of Gilboa (see what I’m saying?), which looks a lot like Manhattan. It revolves around King Silas Benjamin (McShane), who runs his country like a corporation, replete with a PR machine, a cabinet that looks more like a board of directors, and even an opportunity for a few unimportant stockholders to make token suggestions about the direction of the country. The wealthy country of Gilboa is engaged in a war with the military heavyweight Gath, which has tanks that are called Goliaths, although it’s difficult to parse the purpose of the war, except perhaps to line the pockets of William Cross (Dylan Baker), the King’s brother-in-law and the country’s biggest source of wealth (which is in gold, believe it or not).

Enter David Shepherd (Chris Egan), a modest farm boy who can fix a car, play the piano, and talk the skirt of a lady. He lost his father in the unification war (whatever that is), but nevertheless signs up for service with his brother. Early on, David stands up to a Goliath tank and defeats it with his little rocket launcher (it’s not exactly a subtle drama). In the process, he saves the life of the King’s son and only heir, a whiny, privileged sniveling asshole with a wandering penis.

For saving the King’s son, the modest, unassuming David is treated with a big to-do in his honor at the King’s mansion, where he meets King Silas’ daughter, Michelle (Alison Miller). As a public-relations stunt, the King also assigns David as the kingdom’s military liaison with the press, and David somehow manages to use the post to end the war. So, half the kingdom will soon be David’s, right? Not so fast. William Cross wants the war to continue, and he threatens to empty the royal pockets, so to speak, if he doesn’t get it. There’s also the fact that Cross could probably expose the King’s second life, with a poor housemaid wife and a little kid. Because that’s how Kings roll.

“Kings” is little more than a grand, deadly self-important soap opera, but Ian McShane does self-important better than anyone. Here, he exchanges the profanity of “Deadwood” for bad, modern Shakespearean language, but it’s hard not to be taken in by him and his political machinations. The character is not too dissimilar from Al Swearengen. Chris Egan, as the hero David, is a lightweight by comparison, but he’s likable all the same, although the King’s dickweed son (Sebastian Stan) and Alison Miller — as the King’s socially conscious daughter — feel out of place among the rest of the cast, as though two cast members of “Gossip Girl” wondered onto the set of a “Rome” and asked to buy a rabbit.

Most of the dialogue feels blustery — pompous, speechifying. But that’s sort of what we want from McShane, and “Kings” is just the type of vehicle that allows him to be an arrogant, grandstanding cocksucker that he is. The show’s mythology is vaguely compelling, although it’s a little too dense for how ultimately uncomplicated it is. It feels as though creator Michael Green (“Heroes”) created enough intrigue to get you through five or six episodes, but — like “Heroes” — the nuke the fridge moment is already in the show’s headlights. “Kings” nevertheless gets points for ambition, and even if it’s too heavy-handed and the storylines seem incapable of sustaining themselves for the long-term, perhaps the characters — and McShane in particular — can carry it long enough to answer the show’s first round of questions before NBC gives it the axe for not being a procedural, reality show, or sitcom.

Dustin Rowles in the publisher of Pajiba. You can reach him by email or leave a comment below.


The Lighthorsemen Review | Benjamin Button Gets Criterion Release



Comments

I felt that the show was too pretty to be angry at. Also, Ian McShane was amazing even with third-rate Milchian lines which will eventually lead to the problem of the audience being told to root for David, when in reality, we just want to see a cocksucker or two knifed.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at March 19, 2009 4:07 PM

If Ian McShane has HALF the charisma in Kings that he did as Al Swearengen in Deadwood, I'll fuckin' watch that show even after the cunt's long dried up. Beard or not, the man looks like he's spoilin' for a fight.

Posted by: Mike R. at March 19, 2009 4:13 PM

we just want to see a cocksucker or two knifed.

Shiv me and die, Jake darling!

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at March 19, 2009 4:21 PM

I loved McShane in this, but gah, the script!
you can't switch back and forth between shakespeare-esque(blech) speech and modern talk, its too disconcerting!

Also, they let too much be known in the first episode! It could have had half the exposition-a little mystery and buildup would have been a good thing.
I am rather meh about the whole thing. Will watch only for McShane.

Posted by: MissSmilla at March 19, 2009 4:35 PM

I don't care if it's original Dustin. I want this thing to fail, and cost NBC and the Heroes people millions. After Heroes devolved into a bloody abortion of a stillborn bastard child from Dane Cook and Katherine Heigl, they had it coming.

Posted by: George at March 19, 2009 4:39 PM

I was hoping that instead of using these generic fake country names they instead had a take on what would America be like if we never became a democracy. And we were at war with Canada.

America led by a king is more interesting than watching a show about "Gilbao".

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at March 19, 2009 4:50 PM

I was unrealistically hoping for a alt-sci-fi West Wing.

When's that show coming out?

Posted by: Bucko at March 19, 2009 5:07 PM

Add me to the contingent watching only for McShane. I hoped so much that at the banquet he would serve tinned peaches. Sigh. It's so hard to let go.

By the way, those of you introduced to McShane through Deadwood (RIP) should check out Lovejoy in which he plays a rogue antiques dealer.

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 19, 2009 5:12 PM

May I also say, that's one smoldering picture of Mr. McShane you have up there.

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 19, 2009 5:34 PM

I was unrealistically hoping for a alt-sci-fi West Wing.

I think BSG has a lot of that ground covered.

...what would America be like if we never became a democracy. And we were at war with Canada.

We're not at war with Canada? Was I not supposed to be killing Canadians? Just what the hell am I supposed to do with the economy sized crate of Canuck Buck(shot) I just ordered?

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at March 19, 2009 6:00 PM

a whiny, privileged sniveling asshole with a wandering penis

Better than a sniveling penis with a wandering asshole, though.

Posted by: Drake at March 19, 2009 6:11 PM

Good point on BSG.

But it's over :(

I MISS SORKIN!

Posted by: Bucko at March 19, 2009 6:19 PM

...I can't tell if "shiv me and die" is a come on or a threat.

Either way, I am oddly aroused.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at March 19, 2009 6:26 PM

Dude, Dustin, I'm sorry, you've got to hate me at this point, but:

"and at least your starting out in the black" --> should be you're.

I'm sorry, my inner grammar Nazi will not let me be silent.

Posted by: dsbs at March 19, 2009 6:30 PM

You know what is really annoying about this show? It claims to be based on the book(s) of Kings, but except for some placeholders and some names, it has nothing to do with it.

I mean, even if you cut out all the God stuff, it is still a pretty dramatic read on its own.

Maybe the whole David/Jonathan "brotherly love" thing just wasn't going to be welcome on primetime television, so they turned the Jonathan character into such a fuckhead.

I was hoping that instead of using these generic fake country names they instead had a take on what would America be like if we never became a democracy.

That was how they promoted it at least. Nearly every damn commercial for this show had that NBC announcer voice going "What if a country had a king instead of a President?" or "He lives in the most guarded residence, but it isn't the White House." Fuck all.

Posted by: Vermillion at March 19, 2009 6:33 PM

I'm sure Harry Turtledove is writing the America as monarchy book as we speak.

Posted by: MrCresosote at March 19, 2009 6:42 PM

Better than a sniveling penis with a wandering asshole, though.

Well, if you go by the scene on the steps, Junior is that, too.

Posted by: Nicole at March 19, 2009 6:51 PM

According to IMDB, Macauley Culkin is going to be on this show.

I'm guessing he will play the prince's gay lover. It won't be the first time he's been kissed by a grown man.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at March 19, 2009 7:35 PM

I'm sticking around to see how they will translate David slaughtering 200 Philistines and giving their foreskins in exchange for the king's daughter.
Then again maybe they're not taking things so literally....

Posted by: gunter at March 19, 2009 8:07 PM

There's no reason why this show isn't intriguing or interesting -- well apart from the execution. You got Al cocksucker Swearengen as King Saul. And you got Eammonn Walker AKA Sayed from OZ or the best fictional African dictator (thanks to Lord of War) playing the role of the prophet Samuel.

And you know that war and death and violence are how it all ends. So why can't they get this right?

BTW, Dustin, it's been ages since I read the Bible (cover to cover), but I think the "unification war" they're implying refers to the unification of the various tribes around a single ruler. Now, my memory may be fuzzy, but I recall that the Israelites asked God for a king, since it was all the rage back in the BC years and they were getting picked on by Egypt and Syria for not having a king. God at first said No since he had that whole "covenant" thing with them. They kept begging and begging and He finally said (well He said through Samuel) "aiight...it's on y'all" and chose Saul. I guess the show writers want to imply that it wasn't an unanimous choice by the people of America (fuck whatever name they came up with) to have a king -- which would be an interesting concept to play with. Someone ascends to the "Throne of America" and chances are there's going to be a few people not cool with it -- and not just the gun-toting righties or the granola-toting lefties.

Posted by: Fredo at March 19, 2009 8:08 PM

I also think this show should have been set in the ancient Levant. The Biblical story has a lot of compelling characters; Saul--who's picked to be king because he's exceptionally tall--is batshit insane, Jonathan's gay, David can't keep his pecker in his pants and picks up two women at their husband's funerals. Unfortunately, most of the plot points don't translate to the modern world. People simply can't get away with that kind of stuff any more.

And Fredo, you sited a great passage. Before grudgingly allowing the Israelites to have a king God goes on a long rant about how much monarchy sucks.

Posted by: Inaras at March 19, 2009 8:27 PM

I've finally accepted the fact that I can't really tell if I like a show after the first episode (even if it is a two hour special kinda pilot-ey fun). Ian McShane as the king is the bee's knees (awesome) and really has potential to become the cat's pajamas (more awesome). I hope they focus on the things about the show that could work well (inner workings of a monarchy, character development) as opposed to stuff that seems to suck (dialog, his wife losing a cell phone seemed kind of tacked on and unnecessary).

Whatever. It worked. I'll keep watching until it sucks. A modest proposal: Gary Busey as the head of the other country they are constantly warring with. That, friends, would be the cat's pajamas.

Posted by: Billowing Backpacks at March 19, 2009 11:01 PM

Losing a cell phone is how The West Wing started, too.

Posted by: Bucko at March 20, 2009 1:44 AM

Sebastian Stan actually IS a cast member of Gossip Girl. That was a trick, wasn't it? To see if anyone notices? Ok, might as well go all the way: he is of Romanian descent and he's supposedly engaged to Leighton Meister. Card revoked? Thought so.

Posted by: Irina at March 20, 2009 5:10 AM

a bloody abortion of a stillborn bastard child from Dane Cook and Katherine Heigl...

GODDAMNIT, ENOUGH WITH THE SCARY CLOWNS! I HAVE A SENSITIVE DISPOSITION! *resumes huddling in the corner with a teddy bear*

Posted by: Mike R. at March 20, 2009 8:46 AM

L.O.V.E - We were born a Republic, not a Democracy. Big difference.

Posted by: Fuel at March 20, 2009 9:40 AM

The lost cell phone wasn't unneccesary. The mother is a sneaky bitch, she is going to turn out to be more politically motivated and connected than we all know. She "lost" the phone to keep people thinking her son isn't gay ( she knows too). That's why the assistant found it with a bra in her car. And she made sure it was found and the whole act took place in front of the press. She wants to squash rumors of his carousing with men because she wants the throne to stay in the family and also realizes that her husband is angling for a new heir from his daughter's future husband.

Posted by: MISTER Poopy Pants to You at March 20, 2009 9:56 AM

God, I miss West Wing too. TV is awful. And there are no signs of it getting any better anytime soon.

Posted by: MISTER Poopy Pants to You at March 20, 2009 9:57 AM

I enjoyed this. I really got into it. I thought the performances were good and there was enough drama in the pilot to make me want to watch more episodes.

My only worry is that with the ratings being so low, that NBC will cancel it. :(

Posted by: Neena at March 20, 2009 10:23 AM

Maybe because it wasn't a cop show or reality or a comedy POS, I enjoyed this. I went into it expecting melodrama - how could you NOT with the ads? The script was meh in a lot of places, and I saw the whole butterfly crown thing coming from several miles away, but overall it was an acceptable way to spend two hours. More entertaining than a lot of movies I've seen recently, and it didn't cost me $10. I expect NBC will cancel it right about the point where Sammuel gets all wrath of God on the king's ass.

Posted by: Reba at March 20, 2009 12:08 PM

I thought it was an interesting show and I hope NBC gets behind it. I really hate television in general, but I gotta say that I was glued to my seat for this one. I don't think the network really knows how to pitch this one though. I hope they stick with the political intrigue angle - that's where Kings seems really gets its steam from.

I think I'll be tuning in next week.

Posted by: Michael Rene at March 22, 2009 10:04 PM

"as though two cast members of “Gossip Girl” wondered onto the set of a “Rome” and asked to buy a rabbit."

Wandered, not wondered. Sorry.

And don't feel bad, Irina; I knew he was from Gossip Girl as well.

Posted by: Lauralyn at March 23, 2009 12:42 PM