fringe.jpg

The Truth May Be Out There


“Fringe” / The TV Whore
Sept. 9, 2008

TV Reviews | September 9, 2008 | Comments (27)


When I first heard about J.J. Abrams’ “Fringe,” a show on Fox about federal agents investigating paranormal shit and fringe science, I naturally thought of “The X-Files.” I wasn’t alone, so much so that Abrams and company have been going out of their way to say it really isn’t much like “The X-Files.” Which may be true because, until it got mired under the weight of its own mythology, I suspect that “The X-Files” was better. Which isn’t to say that I don’t like what I’ve seen of “Fringe” or that I won’t be coming back. I’m just suggesting that expectations should remain tempered for the moment (and, to be fair, the pilot I watched isn’t what will air tonight, as they’ve since made edits, so I’ll even be tuning in tonight to again watch the first episode).

For those not playing along at home, “Fringe” follows an FBI agent, Olivia Dunham (Anna Torv), who winds up teaming up with crazy scientist Walter Bishop (John Noble) and his smart but pain-in-the-ass son Peter (Joshua Jackson, R.I.P.). Dr. Bishop isn’t just crazy in the “mad scientist” way — he’s actually been locked up in a loony bin for 17 years. And that’s how his son gets roped into things, because Dunham needs Dr. Bishop’s help for a bizarre case she’s been put on, and only PaceyPeter can get the good doctor released. I won’t give too much plot away, but suffice it to say that Dr. Bishop used to work in the realm of “fringe science” (hey … I wonder if that’s where the title comes from), studying all sorts of crazy shit. By the end of the first episode, unsurprisingly, the trio are set up as a sort of team to start looking into a variety of other paranormal cases. But they’re not X-Files. Nosireee. These are cases dealing with “the Pattern.”

With that background out of the way, there are two things this show is going to need to pull off to succeed. First, the actors and characters are going to have to be compelling, so the viewers have something to get behind. It’s a bit early to call this one way or the other just yet, but the show at least seems to be heading in the right direction on this point. While the secondary characters who show up in the pilot are all pretty solid (particularly Lance Reddick — “The Wire’s” Lt. Daniels — who plays Dunham’s boss and is always solid), the key here is whether the lead trio can carry the show. The Australian Torv, an unknown in the states, seems to warm up to the role as the pilot progresses, and I could easily see her getting comfortable in it very quickly (and hopefully her American accent settles down a little). As the viewer’s tour guide into the rabbit hole that is the global conspiracy behind the Pattern, her reaction as she swallows the red pill is well played, jumping from skepticism and relative disinterest to an eventual compulsion to fight the good fight. More importantly, she plays relatively well off Joshua Jackson’s Peter, although I’m already worried about them eventually heading down a romantic, something I’d rather they avoid.

As for Jackson, I’ve actually never been a big naysayer. I don’t think he’s great, mind you, but in the right role, I find him entirely watchable — when I actually *looks around to make sure nobody is reading this* watched “Dawson’s Creek” for its first year or two, he was by far my favorite part of the show. And his character here actually feels very similar to that role, insofar as he’s kind of a smart-ass fast talker. In fact, the main difference between Pacey and Peter is that this character is significantly smarter, and this is the one area of doubt for me, as I’m not sure how well Jackson can play smart. The one scene in the premiere where he really gets into some smart talk was a bit distracting, and I’m not sure if it was his performance or just the way the scene itself was set and played. That bit of dialgoue also involved his father, Noble’s Dr. Bishop. Noble has the hardest job of the three, as he’s asked to walk right on the campy line of a truly crazy yet brilliant scientist. It’s an interesting character and Noble seems up to the task (although I do think there was one time I rolled my eyes a little) and I think the more interesting character relationship in this show could well be that between the father and son. So all told, the potential chemistry for these three to carry the show is there.

Which takes us to the other thing the show will need to do well, which is to successfully blend the stand-alone plotlines with the greater underlying mythology. This is because Abrams and company have said that this won’t simply a mythology-based show, but will be more akin to the early seasons of “Alias,” where each episode had its own bottled story which fit into the greater arc. As to this aspect of the show, the pilot felt a bit thin. Of course, it didn’t exactly have a “stand-alone” plot line to it, since it was setting up the series as a whole. But when it did go into that direction, it all felt a bit stale to me. This is particularly true in the second half, where we were given both a car chase and foot chase which felt, if you’ll pardon the pun, a bit pedestrian. And as for the greater mythology of the show, it would seem that we’ve got this global mega-corporation that may be up to no good, and some paranormal shenanigans to go with that — again, nothing that new or fresh. Which isn’t to say that something must be new to be good, it just means that the show is going to have to work to earn our respect, and in the meantime, we’ll have to wait and see how things go.

The one thing that did stand out to me was the show’s style. They seem to be going for a “cool” thing, playing around with some of the way they shoot and frame scenes, and it largely works. An early scene involving a character waking up from a likely concussion was very well executed and one of my favorites, although a later quasi-dream sequence felt like it was trying a bit too hard. But I applaud the effort to try to get visually and stylistically creative, particularly with the use of a Panic Room-esque method of identifying scene locations (in fact, my favorite single shot of the whole episode comes from where they’re setting up a scene in Baghdad).

Of course, my biggest worry about this show is that it’s on Fox, as many of us could rant eternal about the network’s mistreatment of shows. As of now, the network is strongly behind this show, and they’ve been promoting the fuck out of it (although their recent promos about how mind-blowing the final two words of the episode are is a bit over the top, particularly since the impact of that line was hinted at earlier in the episode). But if it doesn’t pull big ratings, one worries that the Fox winds could quickly change. The optimist in me hopes that they’ll give the show a chance to find its legs, particularly since I can’t imagine they want to get on Abrams’ bad side by mistreating the show. And that same optimist in me hopes that the show builds on the good elements of this first episode and becomes something worth sticking around for, as the Tuesday night TV landscape is pretty bleak. I guess you could say I want to believe.

(“Fringe” premieres tonight on Fox at 8 p.m. with an extended episode, before moving to its regular Tuesday slot, at 9 p.m., next week.)


theTVwhore.jpg
Seth Freilich is Pajiba’s television editor. Something he does believe in is DeSean Jackson.


Cannonball Read | Secret of My Success, The



Comments

Sounds like this has potential. I'll give it a look.

Posted by: rlr260 at September 9, 2008 2:05 PM

Joshua Jackson, R.I.P.

I still just can't believe he was taken from us so young.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at September 9, 2008 2:07 PM

"...his won't simply a mythology-based show, but will be more akin to the early seasons of "Alias," where each episode had its own bottled story which fit into the greater arc..."


Aaaaand we all know how THAT went. Look, first, I don't trust the networks to give Science Fiction series enough time to come into their own, so I'm not falling for that trap. Second, I'm not a fan of "J.J" and; third, this is just a rehash of the X-Files, sorry but it is, EVERYTHING that they can POSSIBLY come up with has been done already ..TWICE.

PASS.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 9, 2008 2:13 PM

I'll watch this, it sounds intriguing enough.

Something he does believe in is DeSean Jackson.

Hell. Yes.

Posted by: Julie at September 9, 2008 2:14 PM

I will somehow mind up watching this. I don't know why. I really expect Hole in the Wall, which I did watch, to get a series pickup and this to not.

Don't ask me. I have seen far too much from the FOX network.

Posted by: Melody at September 9, 2008 2:15 PM

More importantly, she plays relatively well off Joshua Jackson's Peter, although I'm already worried about them eventually heading down a romantic, something I'd rather they avoid.

JJ's already said they will eventually hook up.

I'm looking forward to this one even if it takes a few episodes to find its footing.

Posted by: Cindy at September 9, 2008 2:29 PM

I was bartending on Sunday nights during the pre-DVR years of the X-Files and never saw it. I tried to watch the DVDs, but I just missed the whole cultural phenomenon. I think I'm going to check this one out and see if it catches some pop cultural lightening in a bottle.

Posted by: megbon at September 9, 2008 2:40 PM

I'm already worried about them eventually heading down a romantic, something I'd rather they avoid.

It's Abrams. Of COURSE they'll hook up. And then he'll manufacture some BS triangle with someone else and drag it out through the whole fucking series until all three are ridiculous cardboard cutouts and no one gives a damn about any of them.

I'm taking a pass on this. I've learned my lessons from Alias and Lost.

Posted by: Gabs at September 9, 2008 2:40 PM

she plays relatively well off Joshua Jackson's Peter

giggle.

Posted by: ewg at September 9, 2008 2:52 PM

I'll be tuning in because

A) there ain't shit to see on the TV these days; and

B) that's Denethor, goddamnit!!

But I will withhold love, even if it's good. I will withhold love because it's on FOX and I know in my heart what's going to happen and I will never. Allow them. To hurt me again.

Posted by: Jerce at September 9, 2008 3:21 PM

Joshua Jackson? So how did they reanimate his corpse? Should he be credited as a zombie? Are zombies allowed into the SAG? How's he able to emote, let alone engage in dialogue beyond "braaaaaiiiinnnnnnsssss" or assorted grunts and moans (y'know, when they've got her playing off his Peter)? Either way, damn shame he had to go. RIP.

Posted by: lordhelmet at September 9, 2008 3:27 PM

10 bucks this goes the way of all of JJ's shows--good, even awesome for the first two seasons, then JJ jumps ship to start a new show or movie and all of a sudden the show makes no sense and starts to suck.

Happened with Felicity, Alias, and Lost (which apparently doesn't suck as much, but I stopped watching because it really stopped making a lick of sense and had no Jennifer Garner to keep me interested)

Posted by: Masey at September 9, 2008 3:46 PM

I'm glad that Joshua Jackson (R.I.P.) is still getting work but can't they just leave his zombie corpse alone? I love Charlie Conway as much as the next kid, but for real, just leave him in peace before his reanimation-nonzombie drugs (it's like that shit that Blade took to make him not want blood, duh) wear off an he eats the entire cast.

Posted by: Kash at September 9, 2008 4:13 PM

When I saw the first preview for fringe I thought "X Files Knock off" and swore never to watch it. Since then, Fox has been pounding me with previews, and I'm starting to like it. Maybe they're just wearing me down. Your review brings me hope for a new sci-fi show to watch (or torture my husband with as he says).

I do, however, have 2 major problems with it. Pacey cant be smart, he can be witty, but not smart. I dont buy it. Joshus Jackson (RIP) is always Pacey - nothing else.

Like all the above commenters, my second beef is Fox. They'll let me get emotionally involved. Then they'll jump on the next shameless hussy of a sitcom that comes along. Ignoring my needs! They'll let me hang for months, maybe years with crappy heartless writers who are in it for a buck. Maybe they'll change our date night and not tell me before they finally put me out of my misery and cancel the show.

Here I go getting my heart broken again.

Posted by: elusive at September 9, 2008 5:14 PM

Hmm...so we've got a blonde Australian with a stupid fake accent in the lead role? Does that mean she'll wake up after losing two years of her life to find out that Pacey's married to an attractive brunette who doesn't irritate the hell out of everyone?

Eh, I'll be giving it a try I'd say. Yeah, Abrams' shows tend to spin off into madness after a couple of years, but I loved the first 2.5 years of Alias and tolerated the last 2.5 for the wigs and hilarity. And Lost...well, Lost might just end up being salvaged if they keep up the current upward momentum. Besides (and I know this is kinda necrophilia-tastic) the late Joshua Jackson is quite attractive, and always charming at minimum.

Posted by: Shay at September 9, 2008 5:56 PM

i saw a film at TIFF this morning that starred joshua jackson as a man diagnosed with terminal cancer, taking a road trip across canada to a hipster soudntrack.

true story.

Posted by: celery at September 9, 2008 7:50 PM

Saw the promos on TV, and thought "reheated X-Files". Based on chemistry alone, Duchovny and Gillian Anderson beat Pacey and Anna-whats-her-name (does she kind of look like Cate Blanchett, or is it just me?) . I'll buy X-files season DVDs instead.

Posted by: True_Blue at September 9, 2008 7:58 PM

Just finished watching it. I found all the condescending "honey"s and "sweetheart"s thrown Dunham's way beyond irritating and unnecessary. Pretty weak pilot overall.

Posted by: Nika at September 9, 2008 10:39 PM

She is my favorite. Just saw her on milllionaire personals site """" W e a l t h y D a t e r . c o m"""""" last week. I am wondering what kind of relationship she is looking for on that site.Is she single again now? ☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

Posted by: Jamie at September 9, 2008 10:50 PM

FUCK YOU MOTHERFUCKERS!!!! I'm hijacking a couple threads to post this so that ALL of you get it.
Seriously.
Since I finally just got the time to do so in the past FUCKING week, I decided to start Deadwood. Yeah, wasn't doing it for me. But I trusted you DUMB MOTHERFUCKERS and I tried again. I watched that FUCKING pilot 3 FUCKING times (I may have been drunk and didn't understand a damn thing each time...) ANYWAY.
I just got done episode 4. FUCK ALL OF YOU.
Seriously.
I have never been so pissed at the end of a fucking episode as I am right now. That was so fucking HARD to watch. I literally might cry.
GRRRRRrrrrrRRRrrrr.
I'm never watching this fucking show again.

And I can say 4 episodes in, FUCK the FUCK out of whoever thinks this isn't one of the best shows ever cuz I'm already waaaaay sold.
Okay now I'm gonna stay up all night watching this FUCKING show...with the absence...of...oh hell, I hate you all.

Posted by: jamiepants at September 10, 2008 12:14 AM

I watched this show last night and again the Whore has pretty much nailed the review. It has potential but needs some work. Whore, I'd be interested in what they may have changed between the presentation you saw and what was shown last night.

1. Torv was the weak link among the cast for me. I can't help but compare her to Gillian Anderson and there just is no comparison. And she's no Hugh Laurie in the accent department either.

2. I got a chuckle out of the fact that a show with Joshua Jackson (RIP) so quickly delved into reanimation.

jamiepants, it's about FUCKING time you got on the MOTHERFUCKING bandwagon, COCKSUCKER. PUSSY half price for the next half hour!

Posted by: Ed Newman at September 10, 2008 10:25 AM

Grrr. My cursing wasn't even a shoutout to the show. I was just that FUCKING pissed about what happened in the episode. Sad face.

Posted by: jamiepants at September 10, 2008 11:01 AM

Jerce, thank you. I was racking my brain trying to think of where I had seen Noble before. He overdid the crazy in ROTK; let's hope he doesn't do the same here.

I didn't watch the show in its entirety, but the parts I saw seemed entertaining enough. A couple things bugged me; agent Dunham watches a woman display her cyborg arm and barely changes expression. Are cyborg arms that common nowadays? Ones that apparently hook into your nervous system and function just like a real arm? Because I would think it warrants more than a raised eyebrow.

That, and the FBI's failure to have the building surrounded so their suspect can run out the back door. Please tell me they're not this inept in real life.

Posted by: DeadBessie at September 10, 2008 11:07 AM

"Excellent, let's make some LSD!"

I thoroughly enjoyed the pilot, especially the interaction between Bishop and his son. The pilot definitely laid the foundation to be a great blend of Alias and Lost in a crime procedural setting.

Hopefully, they won't try to force a romance and keep the conflict of her unabashed belief in Bishop (i.e. Mulder) and his general skeptisim of everything involving his father.

Oh, and I also loved the location set-up graphics. Thanks for reminding me where I had seen it before. I'm kind of surprised no one used it before now.

Posted by: Daisy at September 10, 2008 1:43 PM

Daisy,
according to an interview with the other two show-runners at E!Online;
"sexytime is not a foregone conclusion. Says Orci, "We don't want to have a preconceived notion, necessarily, about where that relationship is going to go. We know where the world is going to go, and we know what kind of things they're going to face, but we want to let the actors surprise us with their reactions to things." Kurtzman adds, "Keep in mind, you have one character who is so guarded he can't have relationships and another who just lost someone she cares about--so it's not going just happen by default."

So maybe they aren't going to force a romance just yet. Until the ratings fall, anyway.... ;-)

Posted by: Tarn at September 10, 2008 3:14 PM

"and hopefully her American accent settles down a little" -- why? I suspect this is for the same reasons they remake foreign movies, so the audience is spared to see something less american.

Posted by: Arthur Dent at September 10, 2008 5:33 PM

Okay, I don't get the Joshua Jackson (RIP) reference. Anyone?

Posted by: medusa at September 23, 2008 9:45 PM