web
counter
 

The Feces-Throwing, Hobo-Ginger Step-Child of "Lost"

By S. P. Ashworth | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (48)



flash_forward-9.jpg

We open on Mark Benton (Joseph Fiennes, or as the Fiennes family refers to him, “Not Ralph”) hanging upside down in the driver’s seat of a car wreck. He drags himself to safety, stands, and stares. The highway strip is in mayhem: car alarms hoot in the distance, people scream and either drag a limp body to safety or cradle them in their laps. Mark stalks around, gaping, and yelling, “Demetri!” (because…Demetri? Did ABC learn nothing from “Lost’s” character, Mercutio?) At any rate, the shit has hit the fan. Roll credits.

And so opens “FlashForward,” ABC’s newest sci-fi protégé. Written and directed by David S. Goyer (the good: wrote and directed Blade; the bad: wrote and directed Blade II, Blade Trinity, Jumper, and The Unborn) and co-written by Brannon Braga (the good: penned episodes of “24,” “Enterprise,” and “Voyager”; the bad: penned MissionL Impossible II), the pilot leads off a season based upon Robert J. Sawyer’s similarly titled novel.

So let’s get to it.

We’re in Los Angeles. It’s morning — four hours earlier than the opening scene, in fact. We watch Mark say good-bye to his wife, Olivia (Sonya Walger from “Lost”), and his young daughter, Charlie (newbie, Lennon Wynn.) As he grabs his gun from his safe, a note is taped to its door from his wife, “You’re a crappy husband. I hate you,” and Mark smiles. Because they’re in love, get it? Barf. Then, before driving to work, Mark greets Charlie’s babysitter, Nicole (“Mad Men’s” Peyton List). Side note: who else finds it weird to watch a “Mad Men” cast member not in a 1960’s context? It’s against the order of things, I tell you.

What follows is a set-up before the big bang. Nicole makes-out with her boyfriend in the Benton living room while Charlie sleeps upstairs. We meet Bryce (Zachary Knight), a California hottie slash surgeon who, on a pier overlooking surfers, places a gun beneath his chin. We watch Aaron, (Brian F. O’Byrne with a terrible Jersey(?) accent), giving a speech at AA about his daughter who was killed in Afghanistan. And who is in attendance at the alcoholics anonymous meeting, but Marky-Mark Benton, because what would a male protagonist be without a good drive to drink? (Fun Fact: Joseph Fiennes has a twin brother named Jacob - ‘cause all we need is another Fiennes who looks like ol’ Rat Face.)

We then watch Mark and his partner, Demetri (the wicked-awesome John Cho), carry out an FBI stake-out. They are following a man named Omar who is accompanied by an unknown woman (played by blonde bombshell Rachel Roberts.) And guess what? There’s a car chase. I know. Fucking genius. And then guess what? A car flips over. And then there’s an explosion. It is all very exciting.

But what’s more exciting is the event we’ve been anticipating, and it occurs while everyone’s doin’ their thang: Olivia scrubs-in for surgery, Aaron services a telephone pole (that’s what she said), Nicole keeps ridin’ that pony, Bryce readies his gun beneath his chin, and Mark and Demetri careen into a tanker. And BAM.

Flash forward, bitches.

For Mark, that means a scatter of images including a poorly-lit office and a wall displaying a massive array of pictures, sticky-notes, and a timeline (“Heroes,” anyone?) In his own flash forward, Mark looks a little rough around the edges as he pours over this evidence before doing what we never expected of him - ever: He sucks back on a flask. Aw, shucks.

And then we’re back at the opening scene. Mark crawls out of his over-turned car and stalks around the shit show, everyone around him bleeding conveniently from their ears or noses. Well, that is except the poor schmuck who’s totally on fire. That’s a shame. But Mark has a thought, and he climbs to the top of a car to take a better look. Not only is this particular strip of highway a shit show, but the whole gad-dag city is. Smoke, fire, screaming, car pile-ups, even a helicopter is careening into a high rise. Explosion.

We then flip back to the other characters who are as equally freaked-out by what happened, picking themselves up off the floor (or hanging sideways off a telephone pole, like Aaron.) Back at Mark’s house, Nicole runs upstairs to check on the young Charlie who says, I shit you not, “I dreamt there are no more good days.” Oh, fuck off.

Needless to say we slowly, oh so slowly, find out that not just L.A. but the entire world experienced this unconscious flash forward - all 137 seconds of it.

Well, except Canada. And…can I be honest? We would have appreciated an invite.

At any rate, the FBI hold a meeting to find out what the hell happened. The agents listen to the man in charge, Stan (Courtney B. Vance), who lists off the body count resulting from these flash forwards. Meanwhile, Mark is recounting his own flash forward, which we should all get used to seeing. All of us. A lot.

Suddenly, as Mark’s colleagues stare at him like fucking douche bags - slow clap for the FBI, people - Mark makes a leap, surmising that he wasn’t just rendered unconscious, but had witnessed a glimpse of the future. And, thanks for that, Fiennes. No S-to-the-H-I-T, you dumb, British asshole.

We then spend the next five minutes watching a series of the most ridiculous plot devices unravel: everyone experienced the same day for their flash forwards, which, “as crazy as [this] sounds,” was on April 29th, 2010. How convenient. And we’re only half way through the episode, here, folks. Let me speed things up, which won’t be hard because the show boils down to one thing: Goyer sucks goat ass from a sippy cup.

Actually, why don’t I just throw facts at you? If Goyer doesn’t believe in an audience making their own connections, why the hell should I?

Mark doesn’t tell his wife that he was drinking in his flash forward; we watch Mark drink in his flash forward. Mark and Demetri compile a list of the evidence from Mark’s flash forward; we watch Mark drink in his flash forward. Demetri realizes he might be dead in his flash forward; and if you haven’t figured it out by now, we watch Mark drink in another G.D. flash forward.

And then we arrive at the two “twists” designed to keep us watching (and I double dare anyone to do that.)

Twist one: Olivia knows that her and Mark’s marriage is dissolving on April 29th, 2010, but not because her flash forward involved Mark’s drinking, but because - wait for it - she sees herself about to sleep with another man.

Twist two: Demetri watches a recording of a baseball game during the flash forward. However, (and I admit this is kinda cool), while everyone lies unconscious in the stands, one man saunters among them, completely awake.

Credits. And if that ending doesn’t speak to everything that was wrong with the second season of” Lost,” I don’t know what does.

So the question exists: is “FlashForward” the poor man’s Lost? The very, very, very, poor man’s “Lost,” as exhaustingly overwritten as it is? Or, is this only an example of a director with The Exposition Jitters, frightened of losing an audience from his decidedly sci-fi plot? Personally, I hope we’re witnessing the latter. Finishing “Lost” next spring will be a detriment to many of our television schedules, so I’m happy to give “FlashForward” a chance (granted the smart writing we love from “Lost” surfaces.) But, the real question still lurks: can Mark Benton become the new Jack Shephard?

Well. You don’t really want an answer to that, do you?

S.P. Ashworth is a fourth-year creative writing student from Victoria, B.C. with aspirations of screenwriting, but realizes that without penning the next Devil Wears Prada, she’s pretty much hooped.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Ten Most Terrifying Movie Creatures from Your Childhood | The Book of Eli Trailer









Comments

It was okay -- if only by virtue of the fact that the show doesn't revolve around NURSES.

But I have to say that I'm so used to seeing NotRalph in frilly shirts and Elizabethan collars that I actually had no idea that he was SO HOT!!!

I will be tuning in this week, just to see if he still be lookin' good.

P.S. Oh, no, not this with the italics again!!!

Posted by: Jelinas at September 28, 2009 5:07 PM

I had decided not to watch this because I don't care for Lost, but I tuned in for John Cho and got hooked. For one thing, I'm a fan of the cast except for Fiennes (he bores me) and the premise looks interesting. While I have a sinking feeling that I'll be forced to watch every episode of the series just to keep track of what's going on (something I loathed about Lost) at least the plot is fascinating enough.

Posted by: Brie at September 28, 2009 5:08 PM

Brava, S.P. A perfect recap and analysis of an A+ idea with D+ execution. You just might escape your Canadianism yet.

Posted by: RMT at September 28, 2009 5:08 PM

I'll watch it, but it is no LOST.

One thing that bothered me the most: why was that FBI woman getting a sonogram at 10:00 at night??

Posted by: Kate at September 28, 2009 5:12 PM

*Raises Hand*
I liked it, I'll watch it.
Then again I never got into "Lost." I did however like "Kings" and "Defying Gravity" and we see how that turned out.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 28, 2009 5:28 PM

"While I have a sinking feeling that I'll be forced to watch every episode of the series just to keep track of what's going on (something I loathed about Lost)..."

Loathed? Really?
No offense, but i think this kind of attitude is the main driving force behind why most television sucks.

Posted by: Scott at September 28, 2009 5:29 PM

"In the Company of Men" was one of the movies I was trying to think of for the "Best Debut Thread" yesterday, she thought. She thought this because obviously she can't say anything out loud in this thread, what with the italics on and all.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at September 28, 2009 5:29 PM

I'm a fan of Rob's, but I'm curious as to how far they'll have to deviate from the story to keep the TV series going.

Posted by: LowSlash at September 28, 2009 5:36 PM

Jeez, man. I didn't think it was that bad at all, and I'm a huge 'Lost' freak.

In fact, I remember after watching the pilot of 'Lost' feeling pretty much the same way you did about the pilot of this show (albeit a little less harsh) but stuck it out anyway. What a huge payoff that was!

I'm totally going to keep watching.

Posted by: Cruise at September 28, 2009 5:40 PM

No offense, but i think this kind of attitude is the main driving force behind why most television sucks.
Well, to each his own. I got tired of tying to keep up with the thousand different plots in LOST (and I wasn't a huge fan to begin with) so I simply stopped trying. Didn't miss it, either.

Posted by: Brie at September 28, 2009 5:44 PM

Unless you have the next four shows in the can and are able to render down-the-line judgment, clutching pearls over expository speaking in any pilot episode is like being annoyed at water because it's wet.

Posted by: The Judge at September 28, 2009 5:49 PM

(lip quivers)... But. . . I kinda liked it.

OK, your criticisms are pretty valid. It's an A+ concept with an average to barely-passing execution thus far. But the mystery compels me!!! Who is the guy who didn't black out? And WHY?!?! I suppose, if I was that interested, I could read the book or something.

Also, Sonya Walger! John Cho! Dominic Monaghan! Jack Davenport! And I wasn't so impressed with Joseph Fiennes' acting, but I'm a sucker for really dark hair and long dark eyelashes.

Posted by: MM at September 28, 2009 5:53 PM

Ohhh, italics, pretty!
I thought this show looked like an unsustainable plot built on a ridiculously unlikely premise. Pass.
I would totally do a Fiennes brother though. Just sayin.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 28, 2009 5:53 PM

This has got to be the 5th time ABC pulled this shit, first they had The Nine, a show about people who got amnesia after a robbery, and then had to "flashback" to piece what happened together. Then it was Daybreak, a show about a man who lives the same day over and over again, "bending the time space continuum," in order to prevent his wife's murder, and now this, when they "flash forward" to find out what happens in the future.

Jesus Christ, could you at least let Lost finish it's run before you shamelessly rip off every last scrap of meat on its bones.

Posted by: George at September 28, 2009 6:02 PM

A minor quibble, having nothing to do with the show, but I'd say Blade II was far superior to Blade.
Completely attributable to the directors. Goyer wrote all the Blade movies. Stephen Norrington the hack behind the execrable League of Extraordinary Gentlemen did the first and Guillermo del Toro did the second.
I think I like it so much becasue it's the closest thing to a live action coyote/roadrunner movie. (Note: please Hollywood - do not make a live action coyote/roadrunner movie)

Posted by: blair at September 28, 2009 6:13 PM

You can stop trying to spin Braga's involvement as a positive. He helped drive the Star Trek franchise into oblivion with cookie-cutter characters, stale plotlines and innane trekno-babble dialogue.

Apparently, all you need to do in order to write a continuing storyline drama on television these days is cram as many plot twists and cliffhangers into a moderately novel premise and have episode after episode of characters running around explaining the plot to one another. The trick is making sure that the characters never develop and the storyline never actually resolves anything.

Thank God The Venture Brothers is coming back soon. I'm gonna lie down for a sec...

Posted by: Leftylad at September 28, 2009 6:16 PM

Is it not possible to judge a show on its own merits, rather than holding it up to the same light as another? This isn't Lost, it's not trying to be Lost, so why compare it to Lost?

Also, I think The Judge's comment about being dismayed by exposition is spot on. Between the mouth breathers that keep putting mindless Law and Order and CSI spinoffs on the air, thereby dumbing down the collective TV IQ of the viewing public, and those who are annoyed at having to pay attention to every episode of a long arc show like this and thus give up, can you blame networks for wanting to get as much info in the beginning as possible?

"I really liked that first Harry Potter novel, but it never told me if he killed Voldemort, so I just stopped reading after that one."

Posted by: JustBill at September 28, 2009 6:20 PM

On that note, seriously, a little more credit for David S. Goyer, please: He wrote Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. AND Dark City. And Blade: Trinity may not be the best movie ever, but it gave us super-ripped Ryan Reynolds spouting Goyer-penned sarcastic lines. Can I hear an Amen? Goyer has a lot of stored up cred points. A LOT.

On the other hand, (and I did not know this without IMDBing), he wrote for/produced the TV series Threshold, which I also really liked. It had Carla Gugino. And Peter Dinklage, Brent Spiner and Charles S. Dutton. Sort of like FlashForward. . . a cast that seemingly couldn't go wrong.

And, like FlashForward, it had a "let's take all season to figure out what the fuck's going on" mystery. But they kinda fucked it up, and it ran aground and kind of went nowhere, and then it was cancelled, without any resolution. Let's just hope Goyer has better luck this time.

Posted by: MM at September 28, 2009 6:26 PM

Kate - I was bugged by that too! I started rationalizing it - "Maybe she got a sonogram on the East Coast? At 7 pm?" But it really distracted me.

I've already put this show on my DVR record list, but only for as long as it holds my interest. It could be my new "Lost," or it could be my new "Fringe" and three eps from now I'll forget all about it.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at September 28, 2009 6:29 PM

Close tag! CLOSE TAG!

Posted by: Jerce at September 28, 2009 7:16 PM

Meh.

I'll inflict this on jail inmates, but I won't watch it. AMC is supposedly bringing out a remake of The Prisoner, and I'm there.

"Be seeing you."

Posted by: The Wanderer at September 28, 2009 7:21 PM

All you people whining that it's just a cheap knockoff of Lost... it's based on a 1999 novel of the same name. So are we talking time travel to steal a plot of a TV show to write a book that will later be made into a TV show that has a novel based on a TV show in the future?

Posted by: snapnhiss at September 28, 2009 7:23 PM

Sounds a little like Dark City, where one guy didn't fall asleep when everyone else did while the weird alien dudes were messing with humanity. Or something. And yeah, crossed with Lose.

Posted by: Emily at September 28, 2009 7:44 PM

I think FF has potential, though comparing it to Lost is laughable (I'm talking to you ABC). I'm very much looking forward to seeing Dominic Monaghan - especially after the little snippet in previews.

The cheese factor was quite high, but I'm going to grab some crackers and a beer and see how things progress.

Posted by: Cindy at September 28, 2009 7:46 PM

I never watched one episode of Lost or Heroes in my lifetime so I have have nothing to go off of when I say that I really liked the pilot.

Posted by: Candy at September 28, 2009 8:05 PM

Here's the thing. Lost was just about a bunch of motherfuckers who crashed on an island for the first half a dozen episodes. First season plots revolved around 1)where to get food and 2)what to do with all of those dead bodies. The weird shit started later.

This show, while intriguing and will definitely be on my watch list because I am a nerd and I have no friends, starts with the weird shit and didn't provide that character base that Lost did. It works outside in.

Yes, I totally stole that idea from Sepinwall.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at September 28, 2009 10:31 PM

I thought the pilot was watchable but nothing incredibly special. Then the last two minutes of the episode arrived with the creepy guy in black. Gave me the chills and definitely piqued my interest. I'll give it a few more episodes before I pass final judgment.

I love Lost and this doesn't stand up to that by a mile but it could be a worthwhile watch if they unfold things properly.

Posted by: Prairiegirl at September 28, 2009 10:53 PM

I really like the idea of this show, but it's not s'great in the execution so far. All I got out of the pilot, apart from the admittedly bitchin' scene of the man in black du jour moseying about during while all were aslumber, was that the special effects are just awful. That gas tanker explosion was hilarious, moreso when NotRalph starts dodging the incredibly slow flying debris.

Also, was that Seth McFarlane playing one of the FBI agents, or do I just not know what Seth McFarlane looks like?

Posted by: James at September 28, 2009 11:08 PM

Thanks for the reminder, James, I saw that, too! Looked like McFarlane to me -- and, as usual, he was completely useless.

Posted by: Jelinas at September 28, 2009 11:22 PM

Yeah, that was MacFarlane. I heard he was out of place, so I was waiting for him to suck, but I think the "out of place" criticism really only comes from people thinking of him as "that Family Guy dude". He has the look for a government agent and was perfectly fine in his role.

I liked the FlashForward pilot. It didn't necessarily compell me to keep watching, but it's not as if I have anything better to do with my life. With shows like this, you really need to give it a few episodes to flesh things out to get a good feel for how things are going to progress. I'll be back until I get that impression and go from there. It certainly has a lot of potential, especially once we meet characters who had particularly cool visions.

Posted by: Steve at September 29, 2009 1:30 AM

I managed to sit through to whole 4400, which I thought was rather enjoyable, so I'm giving this a chance. Still some gripes:

- They do get back to normal quite soon after the black-out.

- Very meta comment from John Cho: "So we're basically setting up this tack force to investigate this happening because Joe Fiennes had a vision of him investigating it?" Fiennes' reaction: "Why are you taking the piss, man? This is serious business."

- A kangaroo.

But ending was cool.

Posted by: Adere at September 29, 2009 2:31 AM

Whah? The entire world was affected, EXCEPT CANADA?! Malarkey!! Motherfucker, we are HUGE! Shit can't go down and not involve The Hat . . .

Interesting review, BTW. I will have to check this out, at least to observe their preposterous notions of women who would cheat on Joseph Fiennes and asian men named "Dimitri".


Posted by: Lauren at September 29, 2009 4:14 AM

I liked the bit where his is listening to Alex Kingston and his face seems to be saying 'that sounds JUST like my brother's ex-wife'.

I also like the fact that not a few weeks ago I was watching Joe Fiennes jump on tables in a provincial theatre (Chichester) and now I'm watching him jump on cars in LA in a very glamorous fashion.

No further insightful insights from this quarter.

Posted by: Dora at September 29, 2009 5:50 AM

ABC has a worse track record with cancelling new series than Fox. I've been burned too many times to invest in an ABC show until it at least gets a season 2. The only sci-fi show that has made it beyond season 2 in years on ABC is LOST so fortune does not favor FlashForward. Doesn't sound like I'm missing much if I wait.

I'll also say that Goyer is a better writer than you are giving him credit for. Blade II has Del Toro's stamp all over it (to its benefit) but its a solid script from Goyer as well. He has had his duds but I think the good definitely out weighs the bad.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 29, 2009 8:08 AM

"as he pours over this evidence"

Pores, dude.

I enjoyed it. I don't expect perfection in a pilot, exposition is SOP nowadays so that doesn't bother me, and the premise is intriguing. Also, some fine actors in there. So I'm quite happy to watch the mystery unfold. I think Fiennes' accent is shaky at best, though. At least Jack Davenport isn't bothering with one!

Posted by: Tarn at September 29, 2009 8:37 AM

Here's the thing. Lost was just about a bunch of motherfuckers who crashed on an island for the first half a dozen episodes. First season plots revolved around 1)where to get food and 2)what to do with all of those dead bodies. The weird shit started later

That's not how I remember it. Much of the first episodes focused on basics as you say, but the weird shit also started right away. There is a beastie that gets the ground a'tremblin' and the trees a'shakin' in the first few epis. Something eats the pilot as well.

Despite the stumbles in FlashForward, I'm not writing it off yet. The premise is undeniably good even if I think NotRafe (really, how the hell is it pronounced that way?) is miscast. I've (mostly) gotten over the same problem with Anna Torv over at Fringe. I hope they drop the tired alcoholic relapsing bit. I get my fix for that kind of story over at Rescue Me.

Posted by: ed newman at September 29, 2009 8:55 AM

I know this place is all about "scathing reviews" and "bitchy people" but can we get a review I can finish reading without wanting to slap the reviewer halfway through?

The show wasn't as bad as you make it sound. ESPECIALLY compared to most of the other shit on TV. Sure the execution was duller than it could have been, but its an interesting premise floating in a sea of monotony and unfunny.

Give the shtick a rest.

Posted by: BAM at September 29, 2009 10:13 AM

What the hell? What's with all the hate? I watched it last Thursday, and except for missing the first ten minutes or so (I only managed to sit down right after the multi-car pileup), I was hooked. I thought it was an awesome start.

It's a heavily layered sci-fi mystery, with long story arcs planned out. That's one of my favorite types of shows.

But no, it's not Lost. It really annoys me to hear people go on like that about a story concept that was written about before Lost ever hit the air. There are no time travel or supernatural monsters in FlashForward, there is only a prophetic glimpse of things to come and the storyline is dealing with the ramifications of that. The 'fate versus free will' style of storytelling is the only theme between the two shows that is actually shared, but they both take very different routes to explore it.

Posted by: spideychris at September 29, 2009 10:57 AM

I watched it. Liked it ok except:

John Cho is giving the scenery quite a chewing. Is he going to do that every show?

Also, there is too much talking, not enough anything else. I see in the clips for next week, they're rehashing the same dialogue. Seems like a good premise, but perhaps thin for a series? Dark City worked because it was a movie. I'd never have sat thru a series of that, much as I liked it.

The more I think about it, the less I like the show. I thought it was going to be about unconnected characters working out their flashforwards, not cops trying to figure it out. I'm not sure I care, in that case.

It's in the DVR. We'll see for how long.

Posted by: Chickaboom at September 29, 2009 11:55 AM

I think John Cho is fucking hot. I'd like to make some Asian-esque sexual reference here for laughs, but I don't need one. He's fucking hot.

Eggrolls.

Posted by: scorzi at September 29, 2009 11:55 AM

This show is booty. I really cannot pinpoint where this show took all of the marketing data on last years shows and crammed it between Auto and Investment commercials; but as I was watching it, I began to understand Capitalism kills the Arts.

Even if you score points and ratings, and though it may be authentic in the way that it reflects more of the tastes and preferences of more people, who wants that kind of victory. It's like, okay, I found out kids love candy and fart jokes so we're gonna start teaching Candy and Fart Jokes to kids in Public schools. And we're gonna rate it. And we're gonna buy ourselves a goddamn Rolls Royce from which to throw shitballs placed in candy wrappers, becuz our goddamn marketing department has made it clear that we can still hit enough of our target audience and save 17% on next year's production. See, 'cause the fart joke is printed on the inside of the wrapper.
Shit Candy!

Posted by: Jackseppelin at September 29, 2009 1:13 PM

Uh...what?

Posted by: JustBill at September 29, 2009 3:33 PM

Did anyone else catch the Oceanic sign??

Posted by: Jeannie K. at September 29, 2009 8:05 PM

I saw a great big Desperate Housewives ad emblazoned on the side of a bus NotRalph stalked about infront of just before he met the Kangaroo. Subtle.

Posted by: James at September 30, 2009 12:46 AM

@ ed newman

Sure, yes, there was weirdess, but that's not what the show was about in those first few episodes. The was was about the people. This is a pilot, and pilots are finnicky at best, that is about weird shit. I cannot, for the life of me, remember Fiennes' character's name. I'm not even sure that they said it once, and if they did, well, it didn't stick.

On an unrelated note, I just finished the novel that this is based on: FlashForward will NOT be winning the award for the most accurate text-to-screen production ever.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at September 30, 2009 2:39 AM

Things that stood out to me:

1. News lady says "All we know for certain is that everyone on the planet blacked out at exactly the same time" OK no one on the news would say that, especially not 5 minutes after it happened. That was ridiculous and really bothered me especially the 10,000th time I heard it on their commercial.

2. Sonogram at 10pm and this not seeming weird to any of the FBI agents.

3. I was pretty sure that the mysterious guy walking around was the same guy the main character's wife cheats on him with. I was half asleep while watching and none of my co-workers picked up on it so I could be wrong.

Posted by: Emily at September 30, 2009 7:01 PM

This show is awful beyond belief, but it has enough bells and whistles to make it look purty to mass consumption America.

Posted by: Joe at October 23, 2009 4:53 PM

This show is awesome i was hooked on it from the first episode and it's nothing like lost althought i never watched lost but i know what it's about, but the next episodes are definitely better as the plot slowly unravels

Posted by: Ayame at May 24, 2010 5:29 PM