web
counter
 

The Literature of Sports

By Michael Murray | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (25)



04lidz_600.jpg

Let me illustrate for you just how cool I am.

While channel surfing last week I stumbled upon a documentary about the genesis of Fantasy (Rotisserie) Baseball. I was riveted, like I had just caught a glimpse of the face of God. I dropped everything I was doing (not really very much) and sat transfixed until the very end of the movie. It was entirely awesome. Funny and ironic, the movie managed to maintain an intelligence and sincerity in spite of the completely dorky subject.



I found out much later that the movie was called “Silly Little Game,” but at the time, the menu on my TV listed it simply as ESPN Films, and so I decided at that moment that I absolutely loved ESPN Films and would watch whatever they had to offer. For the next couple of weeks I tuned in whenever possible and watched about a half dozen different sports documentaries.

For the most part, sports fans have to endure pretty lame treatments of the culture surrounding the games we watch. There are the shrieking furies of talk shows, which really just provide sensational, often grotesque amplifications of the event we’ve already seen, or reduce it to a militaristic, statistical analysis, with virtually no effort made to decipher the anthropological or social meaning implicit in the game.

Well, the documentaries that ESPN produces have more in common with literature than they do with box scores. They’re really social documents, rooting themselves in a particular time, place, and experience that speaks to a much larger and more lasting reality than what happened on the field.

The documentaries never stretch too far back (most of them took place within the last 15-25 years) so there’s an appealing and familiar nostalgia to them. It’s kind of like flipping through an old yearbook, and as you come across names and faces you’d long ago forgotten, you find each one inspiring an avalanche of memories that return with a biting, emotional clarity.

I watched one on the 1995 Knicks-Pacers play-off series, and when I saw Rick Smits, the awkwardly white Indiana center doing battle with a flat-topped Patrick Ewing, I was as happy and astounded as if I had bumped into two old friends. And look, there’s Spike Lee yelling from the sidelines! Remember when he was, well, edgy? And there’s Reggie Miller, (who has always reminded me of a Ferengi), impossibly erasing a 6-point Knick lead in the blink of an eye!

With the movie as a prompt, I was instantly able to recall the world of 1995, and all that it contained for me. I remembered who I was in love with, the stupid bar I waited in line to get into and that Christmas party where Dan threw up in the sink. The movie was the gift of time travel.

But the movies are a lot more than just an opportunity to wallow in the tranquilizing buzz of personal nostalgia. The films, now many years past the focus event, are able to encompass so much more than we saw at the time. In particular, ESPN Films does a great job of showing how sports cast a light on different realities of race in America.

Watching the story of 17-year-old Allan Iverson’s sentencing following a racially motivated brawl (he was called a “nigger”) back in 1993, what became clear was not just what informed the man Iverson became, but what must inform the lives of so many black youth living in Virginia. The movie was really about the intersection between race, sports, and celebrity in America, and it was bracing.

Using the cut-and-paste documentary template, the movies tell their stories through video clips, archival photographs and interviews with the participants and observers of the time, and through this pastiche a clear picture of what happened and what it might mean emerges.

In “Without Bias,” a movie that examines the death of Len Bias, the Boston Celtics first round pick back in 1982, we see a portrait of a young man who seemed near perfect. Impossibly gifted and alive, he was just the sort of person we all hoped to be. Likeable and optimistic, he was a hard-working and grateful exemplum. It was happily obvious to everybody that his career was going to be exciting and rewarding, and he would step out of the University of Maryland like a single combat hero and seize the world that eluded the grasp of the rest of us, who sat back watching. However, just two days after the draft, he died of cocaine intoxication, his potential, and somehow that of the rest of the community, too, never realized.



There’s perhaps nothing quite as heartbreaking as watching a gifted athlete die young. Teammates, journalists, coaches, and family, now almost 30 years after the tragedy, still seemed shell shocked by his death. Speaking slowly and with hard-earned wisdom, they try to make sense of the sadness and to find virtue out of necessity.

It’s widely and sincerely believed that Bias was not a drug user, and that his first foray into cocaine also proved to be his last. There was a cocaine epidemic at the time, with crack exploding into the culture like a dirty bomb. It was everywhere, and everybody was doing it. Bias, who was living in Washington D.C. would have been surrounded by friends and a culture in which coke was as common and culturally accepted as bottled water is now. It would have been weird, perhaps even rude of him, not to try it with his buddies on a night out celebrating his future.

The death of Bias, who everybody rightly loved, sparked a media tsunami that resulted in the evisceration of the University of Maryland basketball program, and helped inspire a Congress eager to crack down on drugs to impose Draconian new sentencing laws where anybody possessing five grams of cocaine was thrown in jail for five years. This, of course, nailed small time users, stripping communities, largely black communities, of young men like Bias. It was an awful law that yielded devastating results, and through this movie we saw that what we really lost on the night that Len Bias died was not just his beauty and potential, but that of an entire generation.

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. For the last three and a half years he’s written a weekly column for the Ottawa Citizen about watching television. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Hit Review | Death Is Not the End | Actors We Hate in Roles We Love









Comments

I have seen the one on Ricky Williams, the LA Raiders(which was directed by Ice Cube) and the one on Ali. All three were excellent pieces of sports writing and I hope to catch more of them soon. ESPN has recently turned into TMZ for sports fans but every once in a while they turn out gems like the 30 for 30 series.

Posted by: schrome at June 24, 2010 2:26 PM

I find these fascinating because they don't necessarily examine the sport, but the people behind the sport and a lot of behind the scenes action. The one on Wayne Gretzky and the infamous LA trade was excellent.

Posted by: admin at June 24, 2010 2:31 PM

Who wrote this, Michael or DR?

Kudos either way, just askin'.

Posted by: , at June 24, 2010 2:33 PM

The Two Escobars which was on the other night was fascinating. Great documentary, and if you are interested, also worth listening to the podcasts' Bill Simmons does with the Directors.

And yes, this is very much Bill Simmons' creation. Deal with it.

Posted by: D-Day at June 24, 2010 2:36 PM

The one about Miami football in the 90's was damned good.

Posted by: Melody at June 24, 2010 2:41 PM

Everything I've learned about sports I've learned to have something to talk about with my husband. The 30 for 30 series(30 Films to celebrate 30 years of ESPN) has been pretty fantastic and most of them have kept me interested in topics I've never cared about before - Allen Iverson and the 1994 Colombian soccer team to name the most outstanding. Kudos to ESPN on this series. I think, for the most part, everyone can find something interesting in each of these documentaries - historically, sociologically or sportsiologically speaking. And yeah, I made that up. So what? Ya wanna fight me?

Posted by: JenVegas at June 24, 2010 2:46 PM

I've been enjoying this series too. The Allan Iverson one grabbed me first, and the Ricky Williams one and The Two Escobars were also both really interesting.

Posted by: phaedawg at June 24, 2010 2:50 PM

I agree. This has been a great series so far. I enjoyed the Gretzky one and the USFL one. I remember the USFL very well, but never knew all the forces that were at work that finally put it under.

It's funny, I remember exactly where I was when I heard Wayne Gretzky was traded. I was 14 years old and heading to a video store next to a Little Ceasar's on the corner of Maple and Inkster road with two friends of mine.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at June 24, 2010 3:01 PM

"There’s perhaps nothing quite as heartbreaking as watching a gifted athlete die young."

Sorry, but this is where you lost me. There are many, many things that I take more seriously.

Posted by: Mike at June 24, 2010 3:10 PM

Len Bias was drafted and died in 1986, not 1982. The Celtics didn't overcome this and devastating injuries to their best players until 20 years later. Sure they are a storied franchise, but their fans are still incredibly traumatized by Bias' death. He was a BEAST on the court and I am sad that we missed all the class and entertainment he would've provided through the years.

I've seen about half of these, but I don't think I can watch "The Two Escobars." I felt guilty about the soccer Escobar's death because I celebrated mightily after his own-goal against the US in '94. I know it's stupid but I can't face that.

Posted by: Kballs at June 24, 2010 3:17 PM

love this series.

look forward to when they all come out on dvd.

and yeah, kballs, if you haven't seen "the 2 escobars" out of guilt, then i'd keep it that way. you'll end up wanting to get shot 6 times outside of a nightclub by the gallon brothers.

Posted by: gem at June 24, 2010 3:42 PM

My bad on messing up the date of the death of Len Bias. I have no idea why I typed in 1982 instead of 1986. And you're right, he was completely astonishing on the court, and he just seemed like a really cool, nice guy, too.

And Mike, human tragedy comes in all different manner, but I've always found a visceral kind of sadness when a person, so perfectly alive in their body, somebody whom the entire community took great pride and pleasure in, passes away before their time. It's just that what was lost was so vivid, and so immediate, that it really causes a kind of aftershock, one that lasts years, through the community.

Posted by: michael murray at June 24, 2010 3:47 PM

I absolutely love this series. It brought me back to ESPN, a network that I swore off of three years ago. Seriously - I'm a sports nut and I stopped watching or reading ESPN completely, because they were that annoying.

That Pacers one was amazing though. I remember watching that series when it happened, and reliving it blew me away all over again.

Let's not talk about Len Bias though. That still smarts.

Posted by: TK at June 24, 2010 3:51 PM

Here's hoping they do a documentary on Joe Delaney someday, if ever an athlete needed to be more remembered it's him.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1029120/1/index.htm

Posted by: Pastor of Muppets at June 24, 2010 4:25 PM

ESPN's "30 for 30" has been the best thing the sports giant has put out in a long, long while. Watching "The Two Escobars" this week was sad. Watching "June 17, 1994" (about the day the Rangers celebrated their Stanley Cup triumph, Arnold Palmer played his last US Open and the NBA Finals were all trumped by the OJ Simpson chase) I was struck how, that day, gave birth to reality TV.

Posted by: Fredo at June 24, 2010 4:47 PM

I haven't seen any of these films but I'll look for them now. I have seen HBO's Magic and Bird and I assume that it's of the same ilk.

Posted by: Peter at June 24, 2010 4:51 PM

Each of the documentaries is done by a different director. The directors choose their own subject. I think it gives them an opportunity to do a project about something about which they are passionate. I think that comes flying through the tv in the end product.

30 for 30 is the brain child of Bill Simmons to celebrate the 30th anniversary of ESPN.

Posted by: Grover at June 24, 2010 5:59 PM

Some of these are better stories than they are documentaries (the one on the Gretzky trade, the one about Paul Westhead's system at LMU) but the ones that are pulled off well are fascinating. "June 17, 1994," "The U," "Muhammad and Larry," and "Winning Time" have been the best ones so far, I think.

Posted by: ivn at June 24, 2010 6:37 PM

Like JenVegas, I don't care about sports for the most part (World Cup when my two teams are playing is the exception), and yet I find the 30 for 30 series riveting. Without Bias brought back a lot of memories since he died when I was a teenager. I must admit that his death from a likely first experience with cocaine kept me from ever trying it. I was at an impressionable age and seeing someone with so much promise just die like that really did a number on me in regard to drugs.

The Two Escobars is the other one that I absolutely loved for a similar reason - a connection with Colombia's unrest at the time and when I was younger. I still can't believe they killed Andres; it's just mind boggling. He was such a gentleman, and I'm so sorry to say this, but that is rare amongst highly successful athletes. The Two Escobars highlighted the horrible situation in 80s and 90s Colombia - hell, it's still pretty bad - and the plight of people oppressed by violence and corruption in a way that I haven't seen in a long time. It was very affecting, and I highly recommend viewing it to anyone.

30 for 30 and the My Wish series are my favorite ESPN productions. If it wasn't for those two series, I would only ever tune in for World Cup.

Posted by: Groovy Violet at June 24, 2010 10:42 PM

I was a huge Pacers fan. Watching the miller documentary was absolutely amazing because it showed me the other side of Reggie. While he is still my favorite basketball players, I now understand why my new york friends hated him. I loved how the documentary provided me with a different perspective.

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 24, 2010 11:08 PM

"The documentaries never stretch too far back (most of them took place within the last 15-25 years) so there’s an appealing and familiar nostalgia to them."

Yeah, it's almost like this "30 for 30" series of documentaries is all about sports stories that have occured within the last 30 years...

Posted by: MooseKGJ at June 25, 2010 4:04 AM

These documentaries are really great, and I'm no sports fan. We tuned in for The Band That Wouldn't Die, directed by Barry Levinson.

It's about the Baltimore Colts Marching Band and how they went on after the Colts moved to Indianapolis.

I'm proud to say that my brother plays in the Ravens band today, so that's why I tuned in, but it was still immensely entertaining.

Posted by: mswas at June 25, 2010 6:17 AM

I take issue with the way you spellded wierd.

Posted by: victor. victor immature at June 27, 2010 1:20 PM

Thank God we have a common interest, thank you for sharing, you're a good author. Hope to see more of your articles. Juno sincere.

Posted by: Boston Celtics jerseys at October 26, 2010 11:02 PM

excelent web. Good info congrats. This is one the best Reviews and info I have read lately; one important thing I came across is the fact of the growing Chinese market so english to chinese translations for websites and documents are increasing in demand.

Posted by: john at December 19, 2010 9:55 AM