free counter with statistics Dollhouse Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

090203-dollhouse-hmed.hmedium.jpg
Not So Shiny

“Dollhouse”/ Dustin Rowles

TV Reviews | February 24, 2009 | Comments (102)


I don’t like butting heads with the Whedonites. They’re good people — a little myopic, perhaps, and occasionally humorless. But good people. So, I decided to watch at least two “Dollhouse” episodes before offering a verdict, hoping to avoid some potential ugliness. In fact, I watched the pilot episode twice, hoping that I’d somehow missed something the first time around — something that would endear me to the show, something that had the underpinnings of a cool mythology, or at least something that distracted me from how godawful Eliza Dushku’s actressin’ is. The second viewing, unfortunately, only hardened my dislike. It was better, if only by a little, but it also validated Fox’s decision to move “Dollhouse” to the Friday night wasteland. “Dollhouse” probably won’t make it to a second season, but it’s not because of Fox, and it’s not because of the bad time slot. It’s because it’s not a very good show.

The premise: Eliza Dushku plays Echo, one of several personality vessels in the Dollhouse. She is programmed to be whoever the client wants her to be, and after each mission/adventure, Echo’s memory is wiped clean, until the next episode, when she’ll be reprogrammed for another client. Essentially, she’s a very high paid call girl/mission operative controlled by a mysteriously sinister corporate organization. In the first episode, she’s programmed to be someone’s dream date, and then as a hostage negotiator, secured by a wealthy businessman whose daughter was kidnapped. In the second episode, she’s again programmed to be some guy’s ideal outdoor date/lay, but that client is a little on the psycho side and decides to take her on a bow-hunting adventure, where Echo is the prey.

Meanwhile, there’s also a government agent (Tahmoh Penkiett) of some sort who is trying to uncover the secret Dollhouse, though his motivations — which seem well-intentioned — aren’t exactly clear. Meanwhile, the show’s mythology, shades of Jason Bourne, revolves around why Echo decided to give up her civilian life and become one of the Dolls, which is being revealed slowly through a scant few flashbacks, since Echo has no trace of her former personality left. Also, it appears that someone — either from her civilian life, or a former Doll who went HAL — is trying to kill or save her. Echo’s only real ally, so far, is stoic stock black character (Harry Lennix), who is channeling the vibe of “Alias’” Carl Lumbly. All the while, Echo also seems to be recovering, albeit slowly, some of her past memories, full recovery of which would make this show even more pointless than it already is.

So far, anyway, “Dollhouse” feels similar to the less than mediocre and cancelled Christian Slater show, “My Own Worst Enemy,” only “Dollhouse” is even less compelling, as Echo has no home life to conflict with her prostitution work. When she’s not programmed for one of her clients, she’s vacant — she walks ethereally around the Dollhouse offices with a bored, oblivious expression. In other words: She’s Eliza Dushku, the dimpled female version of Keanu Reeves. Dushku (who is also a producer) is the show’s weakest element — she can barely act, and while you’d think her robotic nature would work well in the context of the premise, it’s hard to tell the difference between when Echo is the listless vessel or when a programmed personality is inhabiting her. Even her “personalities” have no personality. She looks pretty, but the pebble rattling around in her head must have knocked out the light.

Dushku is not, however, the show’s only problem. The entire cast is wooden and flat. In part, it’s because the characters are supposed to be sterile corporate types or government agents, but there’s more to it than that. There is nothing about anyone on the show that might give you any reason to care about them. “Dollhouse,” like its residents, is empty. The dialogue is clunky, and the mythology is shallow. Whedon may have been better served, in fact, to fully reveal Echo’s human side at the outset, so at least there’d be something familiarly human the viewer could cling to.

Indeed, it feels as though Whedon — who has been burned too often by the lack of commercial appeal in his shows — is overshooting now. He’s trying to create a J.J. Abrams mythology and merge it with the preposterous action elements of “24.” What Whedon’s forgetting, however, is his greatest strength: Character development. There are no Captain Reynolds in “Dollhouse” or a Jayne Cobb or Captain Hammer or a Willow. The show has zero humor, and nothing in it resonates either cerebrally or emotionally. The show is inert, catatonic. It’s a program that deserves to be on Friday nights, where maybe it can skate by unnoticed long enough for Joss Whedon to flesh it out and turn it around.

He might want to start by getting rid of Eliza Dushku.


Feast 3 Review | Colonel Lingus



Comments

too bad

Posted by: Li at February 24, 2009 4:24 PM

I agree that I have not been bowled over by the show thus far, but I'm willing to give it awhile longer to find its stride--in no small part because Whedon has said everything gets turned on its head about half-way through. So, we'll see.

Posted by: tamatha at February 24, 2009 4:31 PM

So did she, like, turn you down for a date or something, Dustin?

I didn't love the pilot, but I quite liked the second episode.

And I'm...completely...offended that you think "My Own Worst Enemy" was anything but wretchedly conceived. They were grasping since the second episode to make their mythology and premise not completely retarded, and much like Heroes, just kept making it worse.

Posted by: Kat at February 24, 2009 4:32 PM

I've only seen the first episode, but I agree. Something was definitely missing...as evidenced by the fact that I forgot to tape the 2nd episode. Clearly it didn't leave enough of an impact on me.

I love Tahmoh on BSG, but he's wasted here.

Posted by: Aslana at February 24, 2009 4:33 PM

This is a perfect summary! I watched the premiere only to see Tahmoh Penikett play a role other than Helo. It's great to see him getting work post (or nearly post-)BSG- too bad it's a crapfest. I think a little plot tweaking and re-casting would fix it, however. Imagine someone like Lucy Lawless playing Echo and suddenly the whole premise sounds really fun. if they'd cast someone that could really engage the audience and and have a good time with it then maybe it would make us care about a character with no consistent identity... But with that droopy-eyed Eliza Douchecooch as the star who cares what happens to her?

Posted by: snarla at February 24, 2009 4:37 PM

Much like "Fetch" a successful Eliza Dushku series just AIN'T. GONNA. HAPPEN.

And she really is plain awful, worse than SMG, which is REALLY sayin' something.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 24, 2009 4:38 PM

I've also watched both episodes and am so far underwhelmed. Maybe most bothersome is the show's central conceit that the super rich would want to hire these dolls to be "perfect". Sorry, but think about it. You are some super rich guy (or girl) who presumably is elbow deep in free ass but it's not enough. So you accept a "perfect" doll who is essentially sloppy seconds from your golf buddy! And you risk going to jail for the privilege! And you don't mind that essentially you are raping the doll! So to sum up you are an amoral, psychopath douche. This is the Dollhouse target market? I'm supposed to root for someone here?

Maybe they can make this work, but they have a lot of work to do.

Posted by: ed newman at February 24, 2009 4:46 PM

Count me as one of those who thought the first episode was lifeless but really enjoyed the second, mostly for the development of the relationship between Dushku and her handler. I think the second episode should have been the pilot. After all, Firefly started with the train job episode. (Remember? ... Guys?)

Word on the street is the show doesn't kick into gear until episode six, which is the first Whedon actually wrote. You have to wonder what alternate universe where Joss Whedon is always given the opportunity to develop his shows on Fox Whedon and his fellow producers live in if they openly admit that the first five episodes aren't that great, expecting the series to remain on the air long enough for it to actually be worth following.

Posted by: Macafee at February 24, 2009 4:50 PM

I'm about half in the same boat. I wish the show had something approaching humor. That has always been the strongest element of Whedon's shows, and goes hand-in-hand with his great characterization. The only character sort of witty is the programmer guy. Probably because he's a Whedon alum.

After re-watching Firefly in it's entirety (Fuck you forever, FOX!)this month I noticed it did take Firefly a bit to get going too. Same with Buffy. But after their pilots those shows found a groove. I'm not as sure Dollhouse will and I'm more suspecting it already has. I like the overlying arc (Echo's past, the introduction of killing machine Alpha) but they really should have left the FBI agent out until season 2. It's like they know the premise and logic behind it is strained so they are trying to fill time with 3 separate stories at once. It doesn't feel like a full show, only a half realized idea.

I'm also not sure how plausible it is that Helo is having such a hard time finding a place that has an apparently never ending supply of clients.

I'm sticking with it for now, it makes a decent lead in for my BSG viewing on Saturday morning. But I'm not seeing a season 2 in their future unless there is a shakeup.

Posted by: TylerDFC at February 24, 2009 4:52 PM

Word on the street is the show doesn't kick into gear until episode six, which is the first Whedon actually wrote.

Fuckity what?

Posted by: twig at February 24, 2009 4:56 PM

I was actually surprised by how much I liked it. A lot of what you say is true, and as a Whedon show it's lacking, but it was better than I was expecting. Maybe I just had really low expectations? I didn't know too much about it to begin with, maybe that helped?

Dushku isn't a good actress, but she didn't annoy me as much as I thought she would either. I really did like her as Faith, but when she's doing the good girl thing, it just comes across all wrong, wooden.

I'm not really sure where it's going, or how much of a shelf life it can have. I'm going to watch a couple more, see how it goes.

Posted by: Puddy at February 24, 2009 4:59 PM

Also, I find the FBI agent's rapport with the rest of the agency unintentionally hilarious:

"Who's glasses are these on the ground? The kidnapped girl said a pretty lady in glasses rescued her."

"Oh look at Mr. Dollhouse, talking to the victim, finding an erroneous piece of evidence. Those glasses probably belonged to the girl, dipshit."

"She doesn't wear glasses."

"Pssh. Whatever. We'll 'investigate' it if it gets you off our case, you whackjob."

Or something like that. Seriously, is he the only competent agent in the entire FBI?

Posted by: Macafee at February 24, 2009 4:59 PM

You will recall, perhaps, that the first few episodes of Angel blew serious ass and Buffy didn't get good until the second season. It isn't Fireflying, but Dollhouse is doing better than they did, at least.

I'm not entirely sold on it yet, but I do like it. Eliza Dushku is doing better than I thought she would, story arcs are setting up nicely; have faith in the Joss Man.

Posted by: James at February 24, 2009 5:01 PM

I liked the second episode better when Gary Busey and John C. McGinley were hunting Ice-T in crazy ass dreadlocks.

Posted by: coltaine at February 24, 2009 5:20 PM

I REALLY wish he would have used someone other than Dushku, I haven't liked her since Faith, and goddamit she hasn't played a single character that actually differs from Faith (pissed off cheerleader-hating type [who's a cheerleader at heart] who's willing to get nasty with the boys).

We were pretty underwhelmed by the pilot. in fact, I spent most of the episode counting all the exBSG, exBuffy/Angel/Firefly peeps, etc.

But, that said, I liked the second episode a lot more, so I'm holding out hope.

Still think Dushku sucks as an actress...

Anyone else catch the promos for another soon-to-be-cancelled show starring Fillion? Like, hello, originality. Thy passing is mourned deeply.

Posted by: Stella at February 24, 2009 5:21 PM

Also, twig, "Fuckity what?" had me snortling ... that's my new favorite phrase from now on.

Posted by: Stella at February 24, 2009 5:24 PM

I really, honestly, see where you're coming from. However, his interview with Rolling Stone revealed that the first few episodes were massively fucked with by Fox, and that's one of the reasons there's no humor and it's a bit soft. By his own admission, it'll get better after the first couple episodes. But yeah, I'm disappointed so far, a lot of which is becaue of Eliza Dushku.

Posted by: AudioSuede at February 24, 2009 5:26 PM

the first few episodes were massively fucked with by Fox

So why does he keep working with Fox? Surely there has to be other production companies willing to work with him?

Posted by: Drake at February 24, 2009 5:40 PM

I felt the same way about Firefly for the first few episodes. Then I loved it. I'm not saying you'll come around, but don't judge a Whedon show on its beginnings.

Posted by: Lucas at February 24, 2009 5:44 PM

Because we're already talking about Firefly, can I step in here and say that I recently bought the DVDs because of this website.

I was hooked from the start, and watched the entire series in a binge-like manner over the course of a few nights (You know that "Well ... it's only midnight and I don't have that much to do tomorrow" mode? I know you do)

What a show. Seriously. What. A. Show.

Posted by: Neon at February 24, 2009 5:56 PM

The first episode sucked majorly, especially for Joss Whedon.

But yeah, I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt for now. After all, it's Whedon - his modus operandi is creating shows that start out awkward and get really good. Plus the second episode was so much better than the first - as long as the show keeps on improving on itself like that, I'll keep watching it. Wish they'd move it to a time slot I actually have time for, though.

Posted by: Joe the Plumber at February 24, 2009 5:58 PM

don't judge a Whedon show on its beginnings.

There's no need to judge this show on its beginnings, because a good beginning is the only thing that could have saved this show.

Buffy had a basic, simple concept: girl fights vampires. Angel had a basic, simple concept: good vampire fights other vampires (and monsters). Firefly had a good, simple concept: space cowboys do jobs and occasionally steal/smuggle things. These are basic concepts that have an easy-to-work-with ongoing engine of conflict right at their core.

Dollhouse doesn't have that. It's about a prostitute/slave ring, and - where's your conflict? Helo "investigating" them in the background is not conflict. Lennix having to kill people who fuck with the girls isn't conflict either. At its core, there's no inherent conflict in the idea behind Dollhouse, which means the storyline has to be character-driven rather than plot-driven.

And that's problem two: all of the characters are fucking creepy. It doesn't matter how humane and decent Lennix is towards Echo: he is still, fundamentally, somebody who willingly signed on to be a pimp/enforcer for a really fancy sex-slave ring. Amy Acker's scarred doctor? Someone who willingly signed on to work for a really fancy sex-slave ring. And those are the likable characters; don't get me started on creepy-ass Xander wannabe guy or Olivia Williams, who is apparently determined to make her character the most soulless thing ever committed to screen. If you were in a room with any of these people, you would not have the slightest problem with declaring them scum.

Combine that with Echo's soulless state making her fundamentally lousy to hinge character development on, and guess what - the entire story is being driven by characters I don't care about or actively want to see get killed.

But wait, there's more! The idea behind the Dollhouse doesn't make sense. If I am super-rich and want a prostitute, I will hire myself a really good prostitute. If I am super-rich and need a mercenary, I will hire really good mercenaries. There is no particular need for a mindwipe slavery ring where the slaves can be both prostitutes and mercenaries; the show can't even be bothered to explain why it exists beyond a stupid "well, if you're rich, you want Prostitute Supreme, not just a regular prostitute" throwaway line.

So the show is stupid right from the get-go, and it needed a really good start to even explain why it exists. It did not get that.

Posted by: mightygodking at February 24, 2009 6:04 PM

I'd argue the problem lies with the cast. Buffy and Angel and Firefly all had incredible ensemble casts. This show has one Central Character that's not even chatting half the time and a supporting cast that's drab and lifeless.
It seems like more of a writing exercise than a good show. As if he wanted to write something different each week so he made a loose overlying plot that could encapsulate all this.
I watch it with a fellow Whedonite and I can really only feign excitement and hope it gets better.
I've also heard that they've been showing these eps out of order so... I don't know. I can at least hope for improvement over time. Buffy wasn't spectacular for the first season either, I can only hope this is the case.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at February 24, 2009 6:19 PM

I am easily sucked into shows, movies, etc. When I notice someone is "actressin'" in every scene instead of getting vapidly sucked into the plot like I normally do...well, that's when I know I'm watching something with Eliza in it.

Posted by: Cassandra at February 24, 2009 6:29 PM

Seriously Whedon? Fucking Eliza Dushku? The weakest actress in Buffy history? You want another hit show, and you hire someone as one note as Dushku?

What the fuck were you thinking?

Posted by: George at February 24, 2009 6:40 PM

Like many of you, I was disappointed in the first episode, but the second was much better. I am keeping my hopes up by remembering that the first episode of Firefly that aired (the Train Job) was also a lousy way to start a show.

I fear it won't matter either way, however, as the ratings for the second week were even lower than the first week. This show won't make it out of the first 10 episodes. That's my bet.

Posted by: the_wakeful at February 24, 2009 6:51 PM

My parents spoiled me with HBO since I was weee. I find most if not all basic cable series utter shit.

Posted by: Trollin' at February 24, 2009 7:18 PM

Personally, I enjoyed the first episode and was very pleasantly surprised to find that I enjoyed the second episode even more. Still, I knew - just KNEW - that Dustin would rag on the show. It would have almost been a shock if people didn't hate on the show since it was an expectation that it wouldn't be a success. And don't we all just love to watch things crumble?

Now look, I'm guessing we all love Whedon's past work, so with that in mind, why wouldn't we give this show a chance when most of us here see every piece of shit directors like Apatow put out, still clinging on to the hope that one of his wretched movies will have a glimmer of the brilliance found in "Freaks and Geeks"?

It's the same thing here. I believe in Whedon and his vision and his craft, so I will continue to follow Dollhouse and let him unroll the mythology as slowly as he wants. Eliza Dushku isn't THAT bad of an actress, and if you'll all recall, Sarah Michelle Gellar's acting was about as stiff as a Kennedy cocktail when Buffy began. It wasn't until she connected with and BECAME the character that her acting seemed to become imbued with some sort of life. Something tells me that Echo's character and the plot of the show have much more in store than a week-in, week-out programmable hooker on a mission premise.

Still, Dollhouse provided more entertainment bang for my time than most of the formulaic procedurals, reality programming, and depressing sitcoms offered up on our sets today. Why not give an original show with an original premise at least a fighting chance?

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at February 24, 2009 7:20 PM

I agree with those that say that Whedon's shows take time to find their strong elements -- I remember watching Firefly as it first started and not thinking much of it. By episode 4 or 5, I was with it to its (shortened) end.

That said, I think the problem lies in the show's sterility. So far we've nothing to latch on to. Dushku is attractive, but the role isn't riveting and she doesn't make it either. I think Dushku has done her best work as the foil opposite to the nice hero (Faith to Buffy or in Bring It On versus Kirsten Dunst).

If Whedon and Dushku are expecting people to hang on till episode 6 though...good luck. FOX has never shown patience.

Posted by: Fredo at February 24, 2009 7:27 PM

For once, I completely and utterly agree. I couldn't understand why Whedon would choose Dushku to headline a show, but I hoped the premise would allow for her poor ability somehow. It feels like a poor man's Alias to me. I've seen it all before, and a better version at that (not that Alias was so great either).
And Dushku is seriously one of the worst actresses I've ever seen.

Posted by: Cindy at February 24, 2009 7:34 PM

Eh, it helps if you don't expect too much from any show. They can't all be "Buffy" or "BSG." If something holds my interest for more than a minute, I usually keep watching. It's not like there are a ton of other choices on Friday (except for What Not to Wear - Stacy and Clinton have personality). I still don't mind Eliza. So she's not Streep. Big deal. I'd rather watch her than any of the skanks on the various "dating" shows, who all seem to believe that screaming and slutty are personalities.

To each his/her own.

Posted by: Slash at February 24, 2009 7:41 PM

Am I the only one who really liked her as Faith? I know nothing about the rest of her work... I don't care. She was FAITH! Faith was cool, is all I'm saying.

Even though I liked Faith, I still thought this show looked queer and I was right. That makes me sad. i am a sad, sad klown.

Posted by: Fuckles Duh Klown at February 24, 2009 7:45 PM

First: a confession. I pretty much adore the Whedon, and I self-identify as a BVS geek. (I liked, but did not love Angel, and I FUCKING LOVED Firefly.)
But.
That Eliza Dushku is a train wreck. When she appeared in the Buffy series, I was always rooting for Spike (or Buffy) to punch her in the throat. I admit it: her voice drives me crazy. I mean: seriously: YOU ARE BEING PAID TO BE ON A TEE VEE SHOW. HIRE A VOCAL COACH. I secretly yearned for vocal nodes to 86 her career.
So, I will not, cannot watch DOLLHOUSE. It would hurt me. Inside. Where it counts.

Posted by: Tira at February 24, 2009 7:46 PM

Don't listen to them, my wonderful Albanian beauty! You are terrific, Eliza!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at February 24, 2009 7:49 PM

Firefly started with the "Train Job" episode, but was that actually a good idea? I think the Firefly pilot is terrific television. That was just plain stupidity on Fox's part showing them out of order. If Firefly took time to find its bearings (a statement with which I disagree), it certainly wasn't the fault of the show. I remember watching "Train Job" that first week and wondering why the hell we were jumping into the story as we did and who the hell the characters were.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at February 24, 2009 7:53 PM

The premise of the show a)makes no sense and b) is creepy and not in a good way

a) why would a father risk his little girl's life by having a fembot "programmed" to be a hostage negotiator when you can hire a REAL one? That way you don't risk your negotiator spazzing out, which she did, and he got shot, hello, did he get a refund?

b)premise is just icky and I find it hard to connect to the heroine, because she's, well, a cipher. A blank. And she can't act her way out of a paper sack.

Posted by: lil_a at February 24, 2009 7:55 PM

mightygodking, I agree with you. Dollhouse's premise is rotten at the core, and I don't think it'll last the 6 episodes necessary to clean the bad taste out of people's mouths.


I would disagree about Firefly, though. It's lack of a simple concept (are they lovable roughnecks this week or hard-bitten thieves?) was a structural defect. Whedon couldn't decide what the nature of his crew was, and that prevented the plots from being consistent. The characters were so well-drawn that fans could overlook this, but it really shows up on repeated viewings.

Posted by: ironchefoklahoma at February 24, 2009 7:58 PM

Hotter Amy Acker: Librarian, smurf colored, or all scarfaced?

Posted by: coltaine at February 24, 2009 8:11 PM

yeah. Hmm. The british woman and that computer programmer kid are salvageable, though.

Posted by: jasper at February 24, 2009 8:20 PM

oh, and I know he' on battlestar galactica or stargate atlantis but that detective is the worst.

Posted by: jasper at February 24, 2009 8:22 PM

First off, Eliza had the development deal with Fox which is why Whedon is working with both Eliza and Fox. I liked the first episode, I wasn't blown away but I saw some promise. I really liked the second. I hear that the full Whedon force doesn't show up until the sixth episode. I hope people don't abandon this before we get the chance to really see Joss' true vision.

Posted by: AbbyNormal at February 24, 2009 8:27 PM

THANK YOU. This review summed up my feelings for Whedon, Dushku and this show just perfectly.

I hated Buffy, Angel and Firefly. And I gave all those shows at least 3 episodes to show me what Whedonites were raving about, and they all failed. I think I'll just never like Whedon. Not ever.

Posted by: figgy at February 24, 2009 8:27 PM

God please KILL ME now, the Whedon Defense Brigade is out in full force.


oh brrrrrrother, this show's a stinker.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 24, 2009 8:34 PM

Dustin,

I've been reading Pajiba for many years now. I was even once mentioned on your list because I posted so many times (under a different name).

But dude, take a vacay. Or two. It seems to me that you've lost some of your sense of humor. Your reviews are scathing enough, for sure, but you seem tense.

And you cannot review a show based on one episode. You just can't. Episode 2, "The Target", was heads and shoulders above the first. Give it time, give Whedon a chance.

Posted by: Songbird at February 24, 2009 8:40 PM

I don't like alot of what I'm hearing on this thread regarding Miss Dushku. True, she's at about 7.5 on the Meg Ryan Scale of Fail, but that just means we will get to see full frontal in about, what, two more projects? Hopefully she does a couple of movies during the summer. I hear they're casting The New Guy II.

Posted by: admin at February 24, 2009 8:49 PM

"the first few episodes were massively fucked with by Fox"
and
"Word on the street is the show doesn't kick into gear until episode six, which is the first Whedon actually wrote."

Yawn.
That's the same ole Whedon mythology sure, but i'm not convinced that Fox's fucking with the show was the culprit here. Obviously Dollhouse has some seriously fatal flaws with its core concept.

And word, Dustin.
Harry Lennix is a piss poor Carl Lumbly.

Posted by: scott at February 24, 2009 9:25 PM

It's really not that great of a show. And I love Joss Whedon, so it really pains me to say it. But Dustin is right- it's Eliza Dushku, all the way. The girl just can't act to save her life. but even that, I was ok with (because I just yelled, "Faith! what are you thinking??" during the episodes) because I was expected some ass-kickery memory imprints. But so far, prostitute seems to be the common imprint, so I just feel kinda... bleh.

Posted by: dene at February 24, 2009 9:30 PM

lil_a,

a) No he didn't get a refund. In fact, he lost the entire ransom, which i might add... Echno negotiated upwards. Conflict of interests? Hello?

b) A cipher? Sweetheart, she's a WHORE.
And she doesn't even know it. Talk about ick.

Posted by: scott at February 24, 2009 9:36 PM

Just gonna throw this out there: it's supposed to be creepy, ie, renting out pretty young people to the wealthy. I imagine that's kind of the point, to give you a big, evil organization to go up against (like Wolfram & Hart), for when the Eliza character finally gets all her memories back and starts kicking ass and taking names or whatever. I assume that's where this is going (assuming it doesn't get canceled before the end of March). I guess we're supposed to think it's some kind of Russian mafia outfit.

Also, she's supposed to be blank and kinda stupid when she's not "imprinted" or whatever. Yeah, it's dumb.

Posted by: Slash at February 24, 2009 10:05 PM

100% in agreement with Dustin.

If I'm watching TV on a Friday night, so far Dollhouse is a distant fourth to FNL, The Soup, and Terminator.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 24, 2009 10:12 PM

Fifth. You forgot Skinemax LOVE.

Posted by: admin at February 24, 2009 10:18 PM

I'm officially announcing a schism and the formation of Pajiwhedon.com, where the smarter, more refined ex-readers of Pajiba.com can freely congregate away from the simpler masses.

Tomorrow's first post: "Why People Who Don't Give Shows More Than Two Episodes to Prove Themselves Should Be Shot In the Face" and, of course, "Oscar Fashions."

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at February 24, 2009 11:01 PM

I haven't seen the show yet. I forgot about it the first night it aired (I KNOW!) and DVR'ed last Friday's ep and haven't gotten around to it yet.

I do think some of you are being a little hard on Eliza Dushku. Her voice is not the greatest, true, but the rest of her is great--I don't mean her rockin' bod, but her expressions, stance etc. make her a good actress (not the greatest, but good). Her looks and her athleticism make her a natural Whedon muse, so it doesn't surprise me that he says he created this show with the idea of her as its star. That doesn't mean I think it was a good idea.

I gotta admit, most of you make it sound reeeeeally crappy. But every other time I decided not to watch a Whedon creation (Angel, Firefly) I wound up regretting it bitterly and having to catch up, so I'll be watching this thing for at least two-three episodes before I give up.

Posted by: Jerce at February 24, 2009 11:05 PM

Don't forget the blackpeoplemeat, Pink.

admin, that's on my porn/reality show dedicated Tivo. I call it my Skeevo.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 24, 2009 11:09 PM

You heard it here first people, a Whehad has been declared.

Alalalalalalalala!

Posted by: admin at February 24, 2009 11:10 PM

I dig the Whedon. Eliza Dushky is one of my same sex top 5. But this show sucks donkey taint.

Honestly, I thought the second ep was kind of cool, if you ignored the fact that it was part of a show whose premise makes no sense whatsoever. As a standalone concept, the idea of a hot rich dude playing the hunter with his date was interesting. But as just an episode of this show, with characters I don't give a shit about and a mythology that is already blowing its wad, it just falls flat.

I DVR it anyway so I might watch it hungover on a Sunday, to give it time to blossom if thats going to happen, but I sure as hell wont get all that invested.

Posted by: MG at February 24, 2009 11:18 PM

Tomorrow's first post: "Why People Who Don't Give Shows More Than Two Episodes to Prove Themselves Should Be Shot In the Face" and, of course, "Oscar Fashions."

Ideas... blah blah .. newsletter.. etc etc. In ohter words, I wish to join your Whehad. (admin, that is completely, absurdly awesome and I am stealing it.)

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 24, 2009 11:30 PM

Admin, I appoint you High Priest of of the Hellmouth, and you Anna von Beaverplatz will now be known only by your writing moniker "Serenity von Beaverplatz."

So it is written.

Alalalalala!

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at February 24, 2009 11:36 PM

Nooo! I wanted to steal Whehad but AvB was too quick for me. I'm stealing it from her.

Whehad!

Posted by: Jerce at February 25, 2009 12:19 AM

If I was the Doctor lady working for a super secret powerful, I would expect to have far better health coverage than she does. I mean is it to much to ask for a little plastic surgery. She could get her tits done at the same time.

Posted by: will at February 25, 2009 12:21 AM

"Whedonites"? Now I feel like a door-to-door hooker in long skirts and a wimple. Maybe I can borrow Phillip Seymour Hoffman's. THAT would get me some recluse geek lovin' at comicon.

Posted by: Captain Steve at February 25, 2009 12:48 AM

Joss Whedon gets my benefit of the doubt. I'm not in love with it, but I think it can(by which I mean has the ability to) get better than it has been so far. Bottom line I'm going to watch the first season. He has that long to make me love it.

Posted by: Darwinfox at February 25, 2009 1:21 AM

Enough with this FOX bullshit. Whedon got to air his show exactly the way he wanted to, and it blew. Big fucking deal. This shit happens all the time. He made a mistake, and the show will get canceled because it's no fucking good.

George Lucas, Francis Ford Coppola, Stephen Spielberg, Mel Brooks, David Zucker, Sam Raimi, and countless other big wigs who have made works I adore and revere have done this all the time, Joss Whedon is no different. He's just a genius who made a mistake, but will never hear about it because he's surrounded by obsessive fanboys. I've acted the same way, but even with those people I've drawn the line at some point. (The movies Clone Wars and Howard the Duck for those of you who know I defend the prequels.)

Joss Whedon fucked up big time, but I'll accept that, and move on, because of the memories, and hope for the future. He's screwed up before with Season 4 of Buffy, but he'll probably rebound. Live with the mistakes, and move on.

Posted by: George at February 25, 2009 1:33 AM

Fucked up big time? Seriously? It's been TWO episodes. And for the record, I'm not some Whedon fanboy. I kinda thought Angel blew. And Firefly? Well, I hate to rain on the parade but even that I didn't love so much. I just really loved Buffy. It just happened to be an amazing show with amazing direction and an amazing ensemble cast.

But, all that aside, even I know better than to only give a show that is likely to be steeped in mythology, as is Whedon's signature, a measly two episodes before calling it a fuck-up of substantial proportions.

Ugh.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at February 25, 2009 2:03 AM

Fucked up big time? Seriously? It's been TWO episodes. And for the record, I'm not some Whedon fanboy. I kinda thought Angel blew. And Firefly? Well, I hate to rain on the parade but even that I didn't love so much. I just really loved Buffy. It just happened to be an amazing show with amazing direction and an amazing ensemble cast.

But, all that aside, even I know better than to only give a show that is likely to be steeped in mythology, as is Whedon's signature, a measly two episodes before calling it a fuck-up of substantial proportions.

Ugh.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at February 25, 2009 2:03 AM

Gosh...a lot of people here are so negative and cruel, watching a toilet flush is more uplifting than reading many of these messages. I'm otta here and I won't be back!

Posted by: Doug at February 25, 2009 3:11 AM

I warned Joss about this last May, but nobody listened to me? I was roundly attacked by the folks at Whedonesque.com and harassed by one of their Moderators who went under the named Dr. Horrible. People said that I couldn't possibly be right about the show, or its flaws that early, so I was shunned...and viciously assailed. Now I feel somewhat avenged and vindicated therein, seeing that this, critic (see above)...and others, have pointed out many of the same flaws in the show that I sighted last May...and into June, July, and throughout the rest of 2008, until now.

That said, I loved the second episode of Dollhouse. It is just sad that they didn't make it the pilot episode--it is that good...or should I say, great! Also sad is the fact that Joss Whedon chose to listen to the "Yes Men" (Group Think) masses at Whedonesque.com, instead of the minority view that I represented? I think if he had listened, he would have had plenty of time to change the series in time to save it, now however...he is 13 episodes in, meaning 13 episodes have been written, and or, shot...and there is no way to re-imagine the series in time to avoid the critic driven rough ride, and possible cancellation, that it now faces.

Posted by: Blue Gloves at February 25, 2009 4:02 AM

Note To Commentors: Dollhouse was created as a part of Eliza Dushku's TV development deal with Fox. The show came about when she was having trouble developing series ideas to satisfy her contract with Fox. After asking Joss out to lunch to discuss what she should do, during that lunch...Joss started brainstorming with her...and came up with the idea for the show...and wrote it on a napkin. The point is, this was created as a part of Eliza's pre-existing deal...and she could not be replaced...unless she wanted to replace herself as executive producer of the series.

In defense of Eliza however, Joss endorsed her acting chops and said that she was up for the job. Her work as Faith (very good) made me believe that he was indeed correct, that was until I saw a 2 1/2 minute scene from the original series pilot for Dollhouse posted on a web site that Whedonesque.com had linked to, last May. I complained about her acting, saying that she was not emoting properly, and Joss appeared to be reluctant, or afraid to direct her; after all, she was dating Fox' 100 million dollar man at the time, that being Seth McFarlene (Family Guy), but no one listened to me...choosing to attack me instead, with vicious and repeated personal attacks! I explained to them that I was only trying to make sure that the show would be the best it can be...but I was ignored...and promptly kicked to the side by Whedonesque.com fans. Now, look what they have created for themselves...by failing to listen to contrary views other than their own...choosing to embrace the reckless mantra..."Don't worry, be happy!"

Posted by: Blue Gloves at February 25, 2009 4:36 AM

Wow, a lot of people seem to have a problem with Eliza. I think Whedon knew a lot of folks would have issues with a show where the main character starts off as an empty shell. The challenge is interesting, no? How to build character development with no base to build on, just other people's personalities that she temporarily acquires. Joss did never did do anything the easy way.

Posted by: The Magoo at February 25, 2009 4:44 AM

I must say, I'm a little bit sad.

Not about Dolhouse, but about Pajiba.

Isn't there a difference between puking bile and scathing comments? I'm used to negativity with humor on this site, this is just complaining bluntly.

Not used to that, Dustin.

So my big question here, and I might have missed it:

Where's the TVwhore????????????????

This should be his rant.

To add my opinion, I like that Joss takes a detour from his normal style of writing. It's not a great start, but I'm a little fascinated by the
grey morality areas this show is walking.

So I'll stay watching*

(*Until FOX canceles)

Grtz from Amsterdam

Posted by: magiel at February 25, 2009 6:24 AM

I didn't love the first episode, but I enjoyed it. I really, really liked the second episode. So if the pattern continues, I'll like the third episode even more :) I'll keep watching, and hopefully Nathan Fillion, Alexis Denisof and/or James Marsters will guest star ;)

Posted by: emmaketurah at February 25, 2009 6:24 AM

I just won't to point out cause there's quite alot of confusion about this for some reason, but the first 13 episodes of the series have already been produced so no matter what it will get that many! So as long as people stick with it for the next few weeks when it gets "good" according to people then hopefully you will al begin to love it as much as I do cause personally I thought the first two episodes very awesome in particular "the target" and I think Eliza Dushku is a really competent actress who plays all these seperate parts with high leveld of believability! Also...I think everyone is comparing this to much to Buffy...Yes Buffy is like the best TV show every made so how would Dollhouse ever be able to beat it?! Think of it as it's own show with it's own ideas and not just a cast off from the Buffy ideal and you'll enjoy it a hell of alot more!!

Posted by: morda898 at February 25, 2009 6:43 AM

As the first act of the Whehad, I hereby decree that all faithful followers shall obtain multiple cans of aerosol cheese, bbq sauce and a dog.

Go fourth to the heathens homes on the pretense of bbq, seize the evildoers, slather them in tasty, tasty bbq sauce and I'm sure you know where the cheese goes. Then, my faithful Whedophiles, let loose the dogs of war.

Start with George, the force is somewhat detectable in that one.

Posted by: admin at February 25, 2009 6:51 AM

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIT! ....Seth MacFarlane was hittin' that trim?


*bows down in front of Family Guy/American Dad box-sets*

*sacrifices goat*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 25, 2009 7:05 AM

Bluegoves.. just shut up. No one cares about your retarded rant about Whedonesque and how you were treat oh so horrible, you've got a chip on your shoulder mate and it makes you look utterly pathetic that you're going on about it.

The first two episodes have been good, the second was better but 'Ghost' was still a decent episode with lots of good themes.

Dushku can act and has acted very well in both episodes. I find it hilarious people are abusing her for acting lifeless and boring when she's playing mind-wiped Echo.. ah she's supposed to! She's a shell devoid of all human quirks and charms, she has no memory no genuine feelings. She's not meant to be entertaining, she's meant to be a mindless clone. And until she starts getting her memory back (which has already stated in 'Target') she'll stay that way. Why would Whedon write her or ask her to act entertaining when the very message he's trying to get across is that mind-wiping people is wrong, as the character Paul Ballard stated in the first episode; it's basically murder.

Dushku did a fantastic job as the negotiator Eleanor Penn and in 'Target.' She's not like Faith whatsoever and I think that's people's problem, they want her to be because that's what they're used to. The people saying she's acting like Faith are just being plain ridiculous, Faith *never* was level-headed and calm like the negotiator was, she was the exact opposite. Nor did Faith ever shriek and scream over the sight of a body or run around all terrified and meek. And if you want to compare how the character Faith dances to how the girl Echo was in the very first scene of 'Ghost' ... well nuff said, there's no similarity whatsoever. People are just talking out of their arse they have nothing to support the ludicrous claim that she's playing Faith over and over again.

And Whedon wrote 'Ghost' so no, episode six is not the first episode he writes for the season. Whedon had a completely different pilot written and shot but Fox wanted changes made and he re-wrote it and re-shot it to the pilot you got now, the whole opening scene with the motorbike race was Fox's idea for example. Fox has also said that they will left all 13 episodes air and play out so it can gain viewers so nope, it'd be very doubtful they'd cancel it before then.

The show has a lot of promise, go Dollhouse!

Posted by: Adam at February 25, 2009 8:05 AM

The only time SMG showed any acting skills in Buffy was when she was with James Marsters/Spike or David Boreanaz/Angel and the problem with Eliza in Dollhouse is she does not have anyone like those two to act with. I never cared for Faith in Buffy, but she got a little better in Angel. I did like her in Tru Calling.

And just what does this mean:"Indeed, it feels as though Whedon -- who has been burned too often by the lack of commercial appeal in his shows", HELLO Buffy ran for 7 years and Angel 5, sounds like commercial appeal to me. Fox screwed with Firefly. Although I will say if Spike had not been in the last 4 seasons of Buffy I would not have watched and season 5 of Angel was my favorite, again because James Marsters/Spike was in it.
I also thought Dollhouse ep 2 was much better and I am looking forward to the next one, the music video ITunes is giving away has scenes from other eps and looks good. I will always give Joss a chance, I have loved all his shows, he does come up with some excellent actors, so I am hoping for the same thing this time. HINT, get James Marsters.

Posted by: elainecleo at February 25, 2009 8:20 AM

Well said Adam.

And for all those who think Ms. Dushku a light weight in the thespian department, check out her turn in the film "City by the Sea" where she more than holds her own opposite a certain well respected talent by the name of DeNiro.

I understand the criticisms on full display here but I have to concur that judging a TV show after two episodes is like proposing marriage after the second date; not a good idea.

Posted by: Carter at February 25, 2009 9:02 AM

Who are these people that didn't like Firefly from the start? Anyway, I'm sure as hell not going to stick with Dollhouse for six episodes in hopes of it getting interesting. Plus, I've heard people say the second episode is good, too. If that's the definition they're using, I want no part of it.

And, as Dustin said, these aren't minor issues we're bitching about here. It's not like "Oh, the plot was sort of slow this week". No, the show is fundamentally flawed in its premise, cast, and done.

Don't get me wrong, I'm as big of a Whedon fanboy as anyone else on the internet, but the show's garbage. And yeah, you can tell something like that in just two episodes. There's a reason no one's watching it and no one's praising it. The only positive comments I've heard is that its rumored to get better halfway through the season and that Eliza's acting isn't "that bad" (And, for the record, it is that bad. Probably worse)

Posted by: Bissrok at February 25, 2009 9:14 AM

There were some rough spots in the first episode, but overall I didn't think Dushku did a bad job. I chalk that up to the last-minute rewrite and reshoot. I'd love to see the original pilot. The second episode was even better.

The idea that "it's hard to tell the difference between when Echo is the listless vessel or when a programmed personality is inhabiting her" is just ridiculous. Did you actually watch the show? And I say this as someone who absolutely hated Dushku in Buffy.

The show's premise is not without problems. But I'm not sure this is as much of an issue as people are making it out to be. It's not as if Alias or X-Files or any other genre show hasn't had glaring holes in its premise. It's kind of the nature of the beast. Dollhouse's premise is at least as solid as these other shows.

That said, I still worry about Dushku's performance. She does tend to channel Faith a little too much (particular in the first episode), but I'm willing to give it time. Ensemble casts are difficult to handle in the first few episodes of any show. The pilot, unfortunately, did not really give us much of the ensemble. The second episode did, and I'm beginning to see where it's going. A third episode will probably round it out.

I'm not liking it as much as I liked Firefly, but it's definitely got potential to be that good. Time will tell.

Posted by: ern at February 25, 2009 9:14 AM

I'm not a Whedonite, so I've felt utter indifference with regards to "Dollhouse" thus far. I don't give a hoot about Dushku, so I wasn't going to tune in for her, either. I was prepared to ignore this show entirely, until I read that motherhumping Helo is in it.

That is a tasty, tasty man.

To the Tivomobile!

Posted by: Clee Shay at February 25, 2009 10:24 AM

Whedon's made a weird pacing decision. He's trying to build momentum towards the Big Episode when Echo recovers enough of her memories and/or something weird happens and she makes a run for it. And he's taking his sweet, sweet time.

The first episode set up the rules of the Dollhouse and the FBI guy chasing it. The second episode set up "Alpha," the idea that the memory wipes aren't perfect, and hinted at the Secret Powers What Made That There Dollhouse. I'm sure such "revelations" will continue until the breathlessly awaited Episode Six, when Echo wakes up or some such.

The problem is that the individual episodes that lay the groundwork aren't that interesting in and of themselves. (Yes, let's redo "The Most Dangerous Game." Again. Yes, again. -sigh-) I think we're supposed to feel some sort of emotional link, an ache when we see what's being done to Echo. But I don't. Disgust, sure, but as she lacks a personality that lasts more than half an hour, an emotional link doesn't form.

As many folks have pointed out, there's no one to care about on the show, no one we "want to see win." Not even the FBI guy, who's a total stiff.

Whedon's working like a modern comic book writer. He just assumes that people will be hooked long enough, or give the show a shot long enough, for the meta-plot to kick in and the show will "really" begin. The show seems to have a "six-episode intro arc." Not a good plan. Network television isn't known for its patience.

If you want to make the "Echo escapes" meta-plot climax halfway through the first season, which I don't think is a good idea at all, you'll have to find an emotional hook for the first five episodes. There isn't one. Eliza Dushku is crazy-hot, yes, but it's not enough to carry the show.

Posted by: Soulless Merchant of Fear at February 25, 2009 10:50 AM

Don't write us all (Whedonites) off as blindly following subservient zombies. I've watched every episode of Buffy (I even loved season 6), every episode of Angel, Firefly, Serenity, Dr. Horrible. Bought the DVDs and even the odd T-Shirt.

Despite this, I'll freely admit that every point is spot on here. Eliza is a very poor actress, the characters are unrelateable (Even Jayne in Firefly, despite being a bit of a douche, had an amazing sense of humour and some endearing qualities). I'm also finding it hard to workout the 'point' of the dolls. Do men who use prostitutes really care whether or not their hearts in it, and why not just hire an actual hostage negotiator rather the memories of a dead one channeled into someone else.

I'll watch it to the end, because I'll loyal like that and have faith, but were it not for this, i'd not have come back for the second episode. Which although an improvement, made me seriously miss 'The Middleman'. Eliza's no Wendy Watson!

Posted by: Riley at February 25, 2009 11:42 AM

He's screwed up before with Season 4 of Buffy,

George, you're outta the Whehad. Season 4 is probably the most perfect season of television ever made, in the history of ever. I'll grant you, I didn't really like it that much on the first viewing, and referred to it as the boring season, but since collecting all the DVDs and watching them repeatedly, I realize now the error of my ways. It's paced beautifully, it makes major contributions to the overarcing 'verse, and some of the individual eps are the best single television programs ever made.

In other words, I disagree with your assessment.

I think that Dollhouse, while it's still in its expository stage right now, can go in some really interesting directions. This is an organization that is fucking with people's *brains*! That can't end well. And we see a glimpse that it hasn't, on at least one occasion. The technology question is there to be played with, as well; the human brain is an amazing machine, and I for one am interested to see how they work with that. I mean, you've got both functionality and psychology issues, there. You've also got your "ethics of big corporations" scenario, as well as those of the individuals who pay for these services.
There's a lot there to do things with, and sometimes, a slow build is what's needed to introduce all of those elements into a single, cohesive organism. While I would have liked to actually *like* the first two episodes a little more, I can't wait to see how it plays out.

Posted by: Serenity von Beaverplatz at February 25, 2009 11:51 AM

I'll admit that I'm less than enthused about Dollhouse, and I'm an avid Whedon fan. However, can no one else see that this article was just a giant Eliza Dushku slam? Now, personally, I think she's a fine actress, though admittedly does tend to be type-cast as the "tough chick" (and let's be honest, it is what she does best). But regardless of whether or not you think she's a good actor, three quarters of your review shouldn't be based around this fact. This was a poor excuse for writing, honestly. Get another job, Mr. Rowles. One that you can actually perform competently?

Posted by: Seun at February 25, 2009 1:15 PM

To those that condemn us for blasting poor Dushku's terrible acting with the excuse that "she's playing an empty shell."

Did anybody catch this Nurses pilot? Yikes!

Posted by: Scott at February 25, 2009 2:28 PM

What the hell...?! I come back in here to see if there are any further intelligent comments, and instead I find this Seun person maligning Dustin?!

Oh, there is gonna be a throwdown, beeyotch.

The. End.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 25, 2009 3:11 PM

I saw Dushku and Whedon when they were hyping the show at the Apple Store in SoHo. Joss is really wrapping his head around the show and all the themes. He's gone to lengths to make sure this is a show that people can care about now and in the future, but Eliza really is that pretty and that stupid in person. She's another pretty face with a lot of omg I can't form words for how I'm feeling, but I wanna be 'more' actresses.

Apparently she's got as much hotness collateral as Jennifer Love Hewitt to get this show going and it's kind of sad in that way.

Joss is sacrificing a lot of himself to sell the network and the demos something they can at least accept long enough for him to be himself again, but it just hurts.

The girl isn't talented, isn't smart (no getting older and being experienced doesn't mean you got smart, it means you haven't forgotten all the times you didn't know enough to do better) enough to make a Joss show.

I cry inside, because I really liked her in the New Guy and Bring It On was funny too. That's your limit Eliza. Just stop it already.

Posted by: schmee at February 25, 2009 3:45 PM

I haven't paid attention to the credits (and I forgot to tape the second episode completely), but if it's true that Whedon hasn't written these eps himself, and won't until the fifth or sixth, then I'll hang on. Because the first episode was a mess (I'm glad to learn that Fox insisted on the "look-at-us-we're-superbad" motorcycle chase; I hate it when people try so damn hard to be badass), and I couldn't believe it was Whedon's writing. I didn't laugh once. I may have snorted when Programmer Dude mentioned he gave Echo asthma. But that was it.

Whedon may even be able to salvage what seems like a poorly thought-out premise. Seriously, these people have the ability to wipe and program minds, and all they do with this power is create really nifty dates? I do not want to see one more "made-to-order" date. NOT ONE. DO YOU HEAR ME, FOX?

I know Whedon likes to make his shows about the creation of a family (blood or not), so hopefully the characters will blossom a little more and we'll be given a reason to care about them. I just wish he could have managed it from the first episode like he did with Firefly.

Posted by: DeadBessie at February 25, 2009 3:46 PM

yes....pajiba....i...........agree.............must eat brains....... (slobber)....


does anybody remember season one of buffy? i certainly do, and i seem to recall that it was mediocre, at best. it felt campy, the acting was weak (sorry, SMG only started actually acting when she got to season 2), until an episode called "angel" sparked my attention.


A friend of mine had shown me firefly, and I fell in love with it, watched the season and the series over and over and over and over, and realized i should start watching this buffy show, and I felt the way about it as I do now with dollhouse.


Personally, while i don't love dushku, she can act, just not in certain roles (looking at you, scared damsel but you only really look confused). I maintain faith (no pun intended) that echo will actually gain a personality (they're sort of hinting that this mind wiping isn't permenant with Alpha), and since it's joss whedon, it's one we're going to love.

That is, unless we're all to cynical and mindlessly agreeing with Pajiba to actually enjoy the show.

Posted by: Chayes at February 25, 2009 7:03 PM

I don't really see the problem with the premise. Sci-fi has involved robot prositutes for decades. Assuming one could actually program a real live human it seems reasonable to assume that twisted people would pay for the service. Real Dolls exist for a reason.

And it's fairly obvious that the show will eventually revolve around Echo breaking free of the mindwipe aided by the dark Alpha character and her handler.

I don't think the show is as good as Firefly, but I never expect commercial television to be that good. And it's a better story, better executed than either Buffy or Angel were early in their runs.

Posted by: VoiceofReason at February 25, 2009 7:07 PM

The only reason why Dushku got the job is because she gets nekkid at every opportunity and runs without a bra.

Actressin' at its finest...

Posted by: Raisin'Cookies at February 25, 2009 7:24 PM

To Adam And The Person Who Endorsed You:

You have acted in a way which only serves to proves my point about Whedonesque.com and its many readers. If one has a different viewpoint than the rest of you, we are told to shut-up...or you are banned from Whedonesque, and are assailed on links provided by Whedonesque.com, like this one. You have just assailed me for no reason other than the fact that I have posted a contrary opinion to your own, no other reason, and that is why this show is in trouble right now...as you folks allow no room for others to critique anything Joss Whedon other than the positive.

I complimented Joss...and even Eliza...as well as the second episode of Dollhouse "The Target"...however, I also pointed-out the many flaws with the series plot, and when you do that, offer a criticism of Joss, et al, the Whedonesque.com folks act like stalkers in their crazed attacks against anyone who fails to share their "Mind Controlled" zombie like (Hive Mind even) views that everything Joss Whedon is Pleasantville perfect. You move, and act like brainwashed Stepford Wives in your devotion, like the Operative from Serenity who wanted to build perfect worlds, and that is just sad, because Joss created that character to show you what is wrong with the world when people follow blindly without bothering to think for themselves--that is what it truly means to be a Browncoat, it is about thinking for yourself as a rebel, and that message has been lost on you, and others Adam.

I love Joss too, but even he would tell you that you have taken it too far...and that he isn't always right, or perfect, the man is a human being, after all, we all are! Stop acting like it is the end of the world...should Joss fail...because it isn't...and this will not lead to a nuclear war if he does. It is only a TV show, get the balance right in you brain, and grow-up a little!!!

Posted by: Blue Gloves at February 25, 2009 7:28 PM

I thought Dushku was fine as the hostage negotiator and the date, and the other date. Not special but not bad. Not Whedon-caliber, just average.

But when she's playing Echo in the dollhouse, it really is painful to watch. And I mean I had to look away at one point because I was embarrassed.

The failures of the show go far beyond her, she's just the most visible.

Posted by: monk at February 26, 2009 4:17 AM

It seems to me that the 'second' episode was actually from earlier in the show's time line as the scars on the doctor's face are angry red and fresh looking in that episode and they looked more healed in the 'first' episode. I sort of liked the second episode but the first was a real yawn fest.

Posted by: stan at February 26, 2009 12:11 PM

Blue Gloves,

It is not your opinion that got you flamed. Most of the posts here are pointing out the flaws in Dollhouse. Rather it is the self aggrandizing "look at me and how badly I was treated at some other website" manner in which you express them. I quote:

I warned Joss about this last May, but nobody listened to me? I was roundly attacked by the folks at Whedonesque.com and harassed by one of their Moderators who went under the named Dr. Horrible. People said that I couldn't possibly be right about the show, or its flaws that early, so I was shunned...and viciously assailed

Nobody cares that they hurt your feelings over at Whedonesque.com. Grow up, state your opinions without being a whiny bitch, and you'll find they'll be accepted or rejected on their merits.

Posted by: ed newman at February 26, 2009 2:03 PM

Blue Gloves, you were actually banned from Whedonesque three years ago so I'd be fascinated to hear how you were assailed by people there last May.

Posted by: Simon at February 26, 2009 3:13 PM

okay okay please remember that joss has a way with archs, which means that from this large group of people working for dollhouse are going to split the good the bad thats why joss cant concentrate on just one character, the lines are going to be drawn soon with what appears to be next weeks episode toady is march the 13 so nexts weeks episode echo's true personality or the mixture of are going to flourish upon the evil doll and whoever his trying to do or kill or whatever like all things you cant just jump into stuff like a b action movie you got to have some build up to it some story line and thats what i like about joss that almost every episode fits in a larger way to the big story......... im a fan of joss so it might be that too.....lol

Posted by: jesse at March 14, 2009 3:09 AM

As expected from someone who not only LIKES Friday Night Lights, but created a cult around it.

Let the poor, misguided losers who actually watch television do the TV reviews, okay, Sparky? Don't dirty your pretty little hands with it.

Posted by: Name at March 16, 2009 3:42 AM

Big big big Buffy fan. Suffered five episodes of this dross in the hope it would get better. I think it's time I threw in the towel. In a word, horrible.

Posted by: Cohen at March 16, 2009 1:47 PM

I could not agree with you more, the show is horrible, although I really Eliza Dushku as a person (in real life I mean). She has a sweet personality. But the show is crap.

Posted by: Isabel at March 26, 2009 10:25 AM

And Whedonites are the creepiest weirdest people, Joss Whedon is their god and they pray to him every night for salvation, just weird and disturbing.

Posted by: Isabel at March 26, 2009 10:27 AM

Really, Isabel? Do you honestly believe that about people? All people, or only the ones you've deemed "creepy"?

Then I might suggest you get out of your house more and meet some. You'll find they're largely quite different from what you seem to have made up.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at March 30, 2009 3:11 PM