web
counter
 

"Doctor Who" -- "Night Terrors": Reliably Creepy Doll Faces

By C. Robert Dimitri | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (24)



DOCTOR-WHO-Night-Terrors-Season-6-Episode-9-2-550x366.jpg

“That’s what it’s called: pantophobia. Not fear of pants, though, if that’s what you’re thinking. It’s the fear of everything, including pants, though, I suppose…”

Don’t get too excited. If you’re afraid of everything, then you’re also afraid of a lack of pants.

There is something elemental about being a child at bedtime and worrying about what lurks in the dark just beyond sight. I used a nightlight in my bedroom out of habit into my teenage years, but the inspiration for its first use when I was extremely young must have been related to one of those fears.

I had a variety of vivid, macabre nightmares as a kid; perhaps this was a product of my very early exposure to movies like Alien and The Shining. A recurring one involved a panther perched outside my second-floor window on the roof of my house that then burst through the glass in an attack pounce. I would wake up just before he landed on the bed. (Later I realized this dream was the cause of the déjà vu I experienced during my first viewing of The Neverending Story when the Gmork attacked Atreyu, even if the Gmork is more canine than feline.) One nightmare about a rabbit-eared humanoid serial killer sent me hiding in my closet.

George has his own fears about monsters. He insists his mother, Claire, perform a light switch warding ritual before she leaves for her night shift at his bedtime, and once alone he sees peril in the subtlest shadows cast on his bedroom wall. His pleas for help summon The Doctor, Rory, and Amy for a rare “house call.” They show up to George’s apartment building, thus eschewing the “planets and history and stuff” for another adventure in present-day England.

A door-to-door canvas of the units in the densely constructed building brings The Doctor to George’s doorstep. However, when Rory and Amy use the building’s elevator, the car rapidly drops before they are mysteriously teleported to the interior of a large, dimly lit house in which everything is constructed of wood. For example, a wooden pan they find is painted to look as if it is made of copper. In this house, figures wait just around the corners and giggle mischievously like children. Rory guesses that he has died again.

They are not the only ones that fall victim to this odd phenomenon; an elderly tenant is sucked into a pile of garbage bags before disappearing, and a grumpy landlord leaves behind his bulldog sidekick when he sinks into his living room carpet. The common bond for all of these people: they passed outside George’s window and inadvertently aided in frightening him.

The Doctor meets George’s father, Alex, and poses as a social services worker to gain an invitation inside. Alex is under stress from the aforementioned landlord due to lack of employment. Kudos to Daniel Mays for skillfully playing the straight man to The Doctor’s manic self, as he gradually takes in stride the fantastical events that always accompany the Time Lord. George’s parents have been so concerned about his extreme fearful condition that they had asked for help and were considering sending him away for treatment, and The Doctor serendipitously has arrived at the correct time.

The Doctor does not ascertain much useful information from George himself, but he does find the source of George’s fears, which are centered inside his bedroom’s closed cupboard, where all the items that frighten George have been moved. Frustrated with The Doctor’s manner, Alex asks him to leave, but The Doctor reveals that he is from a location a bit farther away than social services and that the force in that cupboard amplified a little boy’s fears to produce a distress call across time and space. They settle on opening the cupboard, and inside The Doctor discovers nothing out of the ordinary. He realizes that the source of the power is George himself and that George is not the biological child of Alex and Claire as they believed. Stressed by the revelation and pressed by The Doctor for his true identity, George asks for rescue from the monsters once again. In a scene reminiscent of Poltergeist, the cupboard bursts with light and pulls in both Alex and The Doctor, who find themselves in another section of the house that captured Amy and Rory.

Stalking this house’s visitors and serving as the source of the creepy giggling and nursery rhyme chanting (e.g., “Tick tock… and all too soon, you and I must die”) are a group of lumbering wooden dolls. Yes, we have another creature in the Doctor Who universe that relies on an unmoving, unexpressive, unsympathetic visage for scares. Perhaps they are not quite as frightening as earlier monsters with that characteristic, but they did bring to mind one room full of seemingly innocent dolls I once saw that I found to be unsettling.

The dolls capture the landlord and transform him into one of them. Despite the best efforts by Amy and Rory to escape, they transform Amy as well. The Doctor realizes that they are inside the dollhouse contained inside George’s cupboard.

The dolls corner The Doctor, Alex, and Rory, when The Doctor realizes what George is: a Tenza. This alien creature latched onto Alex and Claire and used a perception filter to make them believe that he was truly their son. It was an adaptive reflex and not a malicious one, as George simply wants Alex and Claire to love him. Realizing this, The Doctor encourages George to open the cupboard, and George is transported into the dollhouse. Alex assuages any fears that George has about being sent away by embracing his adopted alien son.

All the people captured by the dollhouse revert to normality back outside, including Amy, who is a little shaken by her sojourn as a wooden dolly. The Doctor assures Alex that George will adapt perfectly into life as a human, although perhaps he should pop back in to check on them at puberty. Back on the TARDIS, The Doctor, Amy, and Rory depart for another adventure, as the dolls’ song informs us that even for The Doctor the clock is ticking, as we see a visual reminder of The Doctor’s impending date of death.

***********

For those wanting to escape from the highly serialized nature of “Let’s Kill Hitler,” “Night Terrors” fits the bill as “stand alone episode” as much as any in the Matt Smith era. That said, it seems odd to see Amy and Rory back on the TARDIS interacting almost as if the whole drama with their daughter never happened. (This episode was originally slated for the season’s first half and rescheduled with only a couple minor adjustments.) Even if Amy and Rory essentially knew their daughter throughout childhood and thus “raised” her in a sense, there is still a parental experience that has been completely stolen from them. Carefree, random adventures on the TARDIS should only satisfy them for so long.

This palpable shift in urgency contrasts too sharply with the imminent events that will lead to The Doctor’s death. The fact that we are biding time is all too evident. Don’t get me wrong: I am eager for quality Doctor Who adventures that are not dependent on the surrounding episodes. Perhaps the fact that the characters themselves now joke about the frequency of Rory’s death removes the suspense from the story.

If you were to ask me during this episode if Rory or Amy were in any genuine danger, even in the absence of any in-jokes I would have said “no.” If we ever witness Amy’s true demise, then being turned into one of those wooden dolls would not be the method. I realize at its most basic level Doctor Who is a children’s program and a light adventure, and heroes rarely die in that sort of story. Explicitly reminding me of this can undermine the tale, however. Humorous winks only work so many times before one begins to feel emotionally divorced from the stakes.

Perhaps the scares in “Night Terrors” were a little too obvious. What made the episode enjoyable for me was another fine performance by Matt Smith. I particularly liked his delivery in describing how far George’s message had traveled across the universe to reach his “old eyes.”

If you were wondering, my recurring nightmare about the panther ended happily when for some reason I slept through the end of it without waking up in fear. The attack pounce culminated in a friendly lick to my face. Just as little Tenza George did, facing the night terror worked out.

C. Robert Dimitri wishes that he had had a TARDIS at his disposal to help him move over this Labor Day weekend.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



A Good Old Fashioned Orgy Review: The Sweetest Little F*ckfest You'll Ever See | "Breaking Bad" -- "Hermanos": Every Man Has to Die









Comments

as the dolls’ song informs us that even for The Doctor the clock is ticking, as we see a visual reminder of The Doctor’s impending date of death.

Hasn't he got 200 years left though? I know we've seen his death, it's been and gone for us, but he's got a while yet. It's gonna be a slow countdown. Unless, of course, I'm being dim.

Didn't like this episode all that much. We've seen it before, children with night terrors, Doctor to the rescue. And in parts the acting was terrible. Rory and Amy in the lift especially. And it was slow to get going and never all that scary, even with the dolls, which I do not like in general. And the landlord thing didn't really go anywhere. No, not a good one this.

Posted by: Carrie at September 6, 2011 11:45 AM

1. It makes so much sense to find out that the episode was originally scheduled for earlier in the season. I was perplexed at Amy and Rory not mentioning their daughter even once in an episode dealing with a child in crisis.
Other than that I loved this episode. I have no gripes with episodes that are located on earth because the Doctor has such a love of humanity that he really shines in these kinds of stories.
2. Loved the creepy dolls.
3. Loved the fact that there's still someone on earth named Elsie (oh the horrors of the coming world where all the crotchety old women will be called Brittney and wear Uggs instead of slippers!).
4. Kind of wished there was a better close to the landlord's arc. He was so horrible and didn't seem to learn a lesson.
5. Was so glad when the child was revealed as a cuckoo because his accent was so different from his parents and I hate when they cast children with accents they couldn't possibly have acquired based on their parents or where they live.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 6, 2011 11:49 AM

And I've been singing: "And there's a creepy doll, that always follows you, it's got a ruined eye, that's always open".

Rory guesses that he has died again.

Don't sell it short. That guess along with Rory's deadpan delivery of it was my favorite line from the whole episode:
"We're dead, aren't we? The lift fell, and we're dead. We're dead... again."

Posted by: branded at September 6, 2011 12:07 PM

---I realize at its most basic level Doctor Who is a children’s program and a light adventure, and heroes rarely die in that sort of story.

There you go. We adults have glommed on Dr Who and think it's for us and judge its stories and emotions as weak or incomplete by our standards. But Dr Who has always been and shall always be a kid's show at heart and should remain so. I think kids would have found this episode more engaging and understandable than the whole "Amy/Rory/River Song is your daughter and you don't seem to care very much" plotline.

Posted by: spljt at September 6, 2011 12:17 PM

1. It was nice to have a "little" story that didn't involve the collapse of the entire universe.

2. George's accent should have matched his parents' accents, as he was raised from a baby.

3. I thought he was a Sensa, (I wish I had CC). It made sense to me that he would "sense" what the family needed and then provide it. What do I know?

4. I loved Rory's comment about being dead again. I'm actually looking forward to all the ways they can kill him.

5. Pantophobia must include my all time favorite phobia: hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia.

It's the fear of long words.

6. What do I know Alex from? He looks familiar, but I don't know why.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 6, 2011 12:34 PM

ASHES TO ASHES. Figured it out. It's not available in the USA, but I screened a couple of the last episodes on the internets because I always read the last page of a novel first and want to find out how it ends. Then I go back and see how it got there. Drives Darling Hubby nuts.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 6, 2011 12:40 PM

I was disappointed that Bernard the bulldog didn't ditch the awful landlord and stow away on the TARDIS.

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at September 6, 2011 12:45 PM

Standalone episode...fine. This one...crap. Not scary, not funny, just dull. The highlight of the episode was Amy turning into a mute doll. Would that it were so.

Posted by: Cindy at September 6, 2011 12:52 PM

Totally agree Cindy, it was all set up and no payoff. It did scare the crap out of my niece though.

http://presentedwithcomment.blogspot.com/2011/09/same-time-different-place.html
More ramblings.

I am really excited about next week though, all the reviews for The Girl Who Waited are really positive.

Posted by: Katie at September 6, 2011 1:00 PM

I loved this episode and in particular enjoyed the interaction between Alex (the Dad) and the Doctor.

Best part of the episode was when Alex (the Dad) was listing all the things George was frightened of. The Doctor's reaction "Understandable" when Alex said "Clowns" was priceless.

The kid George was brilliant -- specially his heartbreaking "Dad" at the end when he was in his father's arms; with his first tear rolling down his face. Made a couple of tears roll down my face too!

"Hasn't he got 200 years left though? I know we've seen his death, it's been and gone for us, but he's got a while yet."

The Doctor lies. I found it very strange that the Doctor should have mentioned his age in such a particular way in the episode "The Impossible Astronaut". Think it was meant as some kind of diversion.

I might be dim but I didn't see much difference in the accents between George and the parents. They all had what is ostensibly known as "working class accents".

Posted by: Meenakshi at September 6, 2011 1:16 PM

I liked it better when it was called Fear Her

Posted by: YesPlease at September 6, 2011 1:55 PM

Alex was also in Outcasts, if you watched that.

I didn't like this episode much, but I don't think you can fault it to much because Rory and Amy weren't in any danger. Suspense doesn't need to come from feeling the characters are in danger.

Of course, this ep wasn't really suspenseful either, and the plot made no sense. What were the dolls? Why were the dolls turning people into other dolls? The origin of George's fear couldn't be that he was afraid his parents would send him away, because his parents didn't talk about sending him away until his fear got really bad, so what the hell?

Posted by: Three-nineteen at September 6, 2011 2:20 PM

I enjoyed it, and I nearly pissed myself when they turned the landlord into a creepy doll. This perhaps explains why I don't watch scary movies...

#wuss

Posted by: Patty O'Green at September 6, 2011 2:33 PM

I agree with 3-19. The episode didn't make any sense for all the reasons you stated.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 6, 2011 2:49 PM

1. Did anyone else get a "Fear Her" vibe off this episode? I felt there were quite a few smaller similarities that it seemed very much like a rip-off. A child in terror, a seemingly harmless childhood activity made into a monster and hiding out in the cupboard, the Doctor's companion(s) and then later the Doctor himself succumbing to said monster, an child-like alien influence, the Doctor posing as a social worker in a working class neighborhood....etc.

2. So now we have YET ANOTHER (third now) option to who/what we saw being killed instead of the Doctor. That is an alien who can take on the appearance of something else via projected perception. Again that would explain the sight of a possible "regeneration" because if he hadn't been shot again, they'd see him regenerate into...well perhaps nothing as it is only a projected illusion rather than the real thing. The burning of the body would have been needed so as not to have proof he isn't the real Doctor. It would seem pretty obvious that isn't the Doctor being killed and burned in a pyre. Now it's just a matter of figuring out what it really is.

3. One of the themes of this episode makes me wonder if it won't carry over to the season's ongoing story. Now by that I mean something that I hadn't considered before. What if River isn't actually Rory and Amy's biological child?

Stay with me on this one. The Doctor had already stated that River developing Time Lord DNA and abilities simply by being conceived in the TARDIS was impossible, as it took generation of Gallifreyans living and working within the vortex, not just a chance schtupping. We also know that the Silence (or whatever alien member of the Silence) already told Amy she was being used in "Day of the Moon" after she was captured. So what if they only used Amy's womb and not her & Rory's genetics? Say she was implanted with an engineered embryo rather that them counting on Amy & Rory genetic lottery working in their favor. Had the Doctor not realized they had a 'Ganger Amy wired to her mind on board, she would have given birth and then theoretically been returned to the TARDIS none the wiser. Arguably, she'd be kept at Demon's Run because the ruse was discovered by then.

I ask this because Alex is asked if he's still father to a son that technically isn't really his. But in Amy and Rory's case, they never had a chance to raise or bond with Melody/River. So it stands to reason to ask if they would still consider her their child if it were in fact proven that she wasn't theirs? What if like this story, they will find out that River isn't theirs and will be asked if it matters. Maybe this is the big, depressing secret the Doctor is seen with at the teaser of the previous story.

Posted by: bleujayone at September 6, 2011 3:08 PM

This episode made me realize why Amy doesn't work for me: no character development. Parts of her life have changed - she's married, had a child - but she has not grown or matured as a person. Compare that to any of the other companions (especially Donna), who grew and changed and became better people as their time with the Doctor influenced who they were. I don't think Amy has changed one iota, and my interest in her as a character is fading considerably.

Posted by: Lauren at September 6, 2011 5:28 PM

I've always been one of Amy's most ardent defenders, but she's starting to lose me for the reasons Lauren mentioned above. She's not changing and she's not playing an active role in the episodes and this might be the fault of the writers as much as Karen Gillan. Maybe the next episode, which seems to be very Amy-centric, will help to redeem her a little bit.

That said, I enjoyed the episode a lot even though it had plently of plot holes and not much was really explained (why did the dolls transform them again...?). It was fun and spooky and I appreciated that a great deal.

Posted by: beckster at September 6, 2011 7:15 PM

The Oz Sci-Fi channel are re-running the Tom Baker years and it has crystallized a few thoughts on the current incarnation: specifically where I have been going wrong in my criticism. It’s not that the season arc is too complex to follow, or even that the standalone episodes are exceptionally poor- it’s that the central questions are overwhelming everything else.

The Doctor and his companions had back stories in the original, however they were mostly subordinate to the situations in which they would find themselves. Even the most beloved of companions Sarah Jane Smith was a journalist…and that’s about the limit of her background. Character growth was a product of her participation, not foisted upon her in large slabs of exposition over which she has little control.

Dr Who was all about how interacted with places they visited, the cultures they would meet, the situations they would be dropped into: the thrill of learning and discovery, the victory of (pseudoscientific) intellect over of force, etc. An advert for the diverse wonders of the universe.

The resurrected series may have introduced more detailed backstories and series arcs- mostly for the good, although a little too London centric for mine- but RTD was smart enough to remember what made the original run so enduring. The season long threads were there, but mostly as a background hum (eg Bad Wolf) rather than a front and centre distraction, and Rose, Donna (and to a smaller degree Martha and Mickey) grew through their choices and actions. There were rarely the jarring shifts that have become so evident this year, this episode being one such example. Thinking back, it was probably not that the mermaid episode was poor, so much as my thinking “hang on: how can you be caught up here when you haven’t wrapped up the last one?”

The frustrating thing is that Amy aside*, all the elements are there: Matt Smith is a fantastic Doctor, Rory is an excellent foil and My Favourite Milf Alex Kingston is camping it up and clearly having a ball. The few character moments they are allowed reveal a terrific rapport between the players and the current showrunner has conceived some of the finest moments of the New Doctor Who. Yet it is steadily turning from an engaging piece of escapist fun into an overthought drag that is steadily draining my ability to care. Hopefully whenever the next series happens, it settles down a bit, goes with slightly fewer "spoilers" and explores the universe a little more and themselves a little bit less.

*Amy has become a more notable problem as the series has worn. I don’t know whether it is the way the character is written or the way Karen Gillam reads it, but she just doesn’t seem “big” enough for the significance the narrative demands of her. But that’s another essay

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at September 6, 2011 10:44 PM

bleujayone,
All good points except for one thing. The Doctor said Amy carrying the child on the Tardis wasn't a problem but he got instantly silent when he heard she concieved on the Tardis. And he said the Time Lords develpoed their powers by being in close proximity to the untempered schism on Gallifrey for centuries, not actually working in the vortex

Posted by: JackRandom at September 6, 2011 10:49 PM

And Dave,
come on man, only porn sites use the term MILF anymore. Don't be that guy.

Posted by: JackRandom at September 6, 2011 10:57 PM

My humblest apologies, my netiquette glossary is clearly out of date. Substitute for whichever "appealing woman over the age of 40" acronym or epithet you deem appropriate.

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at September 6, 2011 11:16 PM

JackRandom,

But again, it was only after generations of Galifreyans being exposed to time travel before other developments happened. Arguably previous Doctor Who stories suggested that regular Galifreyans were very much human-like and that only those selected to be Time Lords received extra conditioning to give them the ability to regenerate. At one point the Time Lords even offered the Master a new regeneration cycle in return for his services- since he used up his ability. They seemed to have made good on that offer during the Time War as we have seen him regenerate since then. I am not going to be as ironclad to continuity since there have been so many contradiction in it over the decades- especially between the original and revived productions.

I mean if it were that easy and probable for the Doctor's companions to breed little Time Lords of their own, I would imagine previous TARDIS crew would have done so already. For that matter the Doctor being the whole "Last of the Time Lords" diatribe that NuWho has had would mean very little if they were so easily replaced. And if for some reason if this were indeed always a distinct possibility, then the Doctor must have taken a eon's worth of Moron Pills since he regularly let a newlywed couple go carnal in his temporal treehouse without so much as a second thought. Never once did he state, "No shagging in the TARDIS".

For the Silence to depend on the chance for Amy and Rory to bumps uglys in the TARDIS and hope for the seemingly random chance that they would both conceive a child AND that it should happen to develop Time Lord traits is a hope hinging on a herculean number of improbable odds. It would be far more likely that certain elements were deliberately manipulated. It wouldn't be that hard to get DNA samples and engineer them accordingly under the guise of a random natural act. However, I am saying that if Moffat and company really did write this story as such where the whole River into Time Lord as just the Doctor's enemies taking advantage of something they didn't really control in the first place, then the Silence has got to be quite literally the luckiest SOB's in the history of the universe. And if that's the case than clearly someone left the Improbability Drive on overload, and we should next expect a vat of Nestle Chocolate Milk to become the new cure for cancer because the sonic screwdriver was set to 'Wubble". It would make about as much sense.

Posted by: bleujayone at September 6, 2011 11:49 PM

Fear Her was a good premise and beginning (fingers on lips!) that ended up being awful. Night Terrors worked with a similar concept but was much, much better.

For those who complained that it wasn't scary. A reminder that Doctor Who is still a family show, as in, able to be watched and enjoyed by everyone from 8 to 80. Our 7 and 8-year-old's have watched every episode of the new Dr. Who and both agreed that this was the scariest yet, scarier than The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances, and scarier even than Blink. And the nightmares and difficulty getting to sleep since they've watched it would seem to bear that out.

If you want truly scary, go find a show that isn't shown at 7pm in the early afternoon.

Posted by: Keven at September 7, 2011 2:43 AM

my favourite is the amy doll.

Posted by: Charlie Bowden at October 16, 2011 10:08 AM