web
counter
 

Dog Eat Dog. Really.

By Michael Murray | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (35)



f-Dog-Eat-Dog-4859.jpg

When I first heard about the show “Animal Precinct,” I was pretty sure that it was going to be a mushy and unintentional comedy. A documentary reality series from Animal Planet, the show appeared to be a sort of spin-off of “Cops,” only instead of having the Alphas of the constabulary pursuing the open, visible sores of the underworld, we’d get to see ASPCA officers track down people who forgot to feed their pets.

Honestly, the potential for ridiculousness was simply off the charts. I imagined some variation of a Christopher Guest movie,with the earnest officers of the ASPCA portrayed as a motley crew of the demoted and demoralized, people who couldn’t make the grade as regular cops. Self-important and physically imperfect, they’d troll about the suburbs, imposing their thin authority upon those who committed the most innocuous or benign infraction.

Well, I was wrong.

As it turns out, the show is set in New York City, where five million pets try to exist within a metropolis of eight million people. Far from being a study of a fey middle class and their love affair with pets, “Animal Precinct” is more of a portrait of how difficult it is to thrive — regardless of your species — if you’ve been relegated to the bottom tier of society.

The voice in the introductory narration has a gravelly quality, as if accustomed to hookers, whiskey, and hard times. His tone suggests that we’re about to embark on a journey through Sin City, and not watch cute puppy videos on YouTube, as perhaps we had expected.



And so, on a gunmetal gray day, we accompany officers Gankiewicz and Ryan — who look culled from central cop show casting — as they drive by low-slung buildings of little character, and across a prosaic bridge to investigate the report of emaciated dogs. Ominous music hums like a Hydro wire in the background, while the officers chat with one another in the world weary cadences of vets who hope for the best, but expect the worst.

Arriving at a housing project in the Bronx, they discover a couple of cadaverous-looking dogs in a small apartment. As the officers, who have full police authority, (including guns!) remove the animals from the premises, we catch a glimpse out the window of a barren and desolate stretch of landscape.

This is not the New York that the tourism commission would want us to see. No, on “Animal Precinct” we visit the peripheries of the city, and enter into the dreary and compromised areas where people with limited options actually live, instead of the mythologized and glittering neighborhoods of our dreams.


At any rate, the rescued dogs are then taken to the veterinary clinic where they are examined and diagnosed. The animals are utterly heartbreaking in the naked honesty of their suffering. In their faces we see an irresistible transparency, and we want more than anything to end their pain and bask in the uncomplicated purity of their love. We rejoice in the rehabilitation, cheering as they gain weight and confidence, and proudly watch as the animal, now joyous and fit, frolics upon a sunny field of green, awaiting the beautiful closure of adoption by Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks.

However, for the show to have authentic emotional gravitas, we must also see the stories of some of the animals that don’t make it and have to be put down. Indignant, we the audience thirst for justice, hopeful that somebody will be held accountable. The ASPCA officers plod along, slowly trying to corral the bad guys, but clearly it’s a next to impossible task. In an almost limitless city, there are only 20 animal cruelty officers (when the show debuted there were only 10), and it’s obvious that they spend the vast majority of their time filling out forms that will never be read, trapped in traffic jams or suffocating in offices with poor ventilation. The satisfaction in their job is not in the punishment, but in the rescue.

There’s an irony in this, I think.

In this particular economic context, pets sometimes exist as either competition for, or as a means to acquire resources, and not as the happy extension of a loving and prosperous family. In these corners of the city, it’s a dog eat dog world.

By and large, the focus in North America is to remove the criminal element from civil society. The offenders are then placed in prison, which is clearly a toxic environment that exacerbates and amplifies whatever impulses might have created the criminal in the first place. It’s punitive, with the operative philosophy being that each individual is essentially lost to the civil world.

“Animal Precinct” illustrates the opposite. The animal, abused by circumstance and environment, is presumed to have devolved from it’s ideal self, and is removed from the pestilent conditions where it’s been formed, and then cared for — both medically and emotionally — and placed in a nurturing environment. It’s instructive how attitudes toward people and animals can be so dramatically different.

However, the focus of “Animal Precinct” is on the pathos of the animals, and not the people who preside over them.

When it comes to our pets, we have nothing but sympathy and compassion. When we look into their faces, we feel that we see a truth that transcends language. We’re all touched by the story of a starving dog and root for a happy ending.

“Animal Precinct” is kind of like “Extreme Makeover: Home Edition,” only for pets. We get to meet animals with special needs, and then see a community rally around them, giving them the gift of a new and beautiful beginning. For the most part, the show provides closure, a happy ending for each animal and for us watching, allowing us to believe that yes, salvation is always at hand.

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. For the last three and a half years he’s written a weekly column for the Ottawa Citizen about watching television. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.









The Ten Most Popular TV Episodes of the Aughts | Pajiba Love 12/04/09













Comments

Pass.

Posted by: Kballs at December 4, 2009 11:42 AM

"The satisfaction in their job is not in the punishment, but in the rescue."


Amen

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 4, 2009 11:43 AM

The animals are utterly heartbreaking in the naked honesty of their suffering.

Yes. And that is why I once watched about twenty minutes of Animal Precinct and have never looked at it again--not because it's a bad show but because I simply cannot bear it.

I congratulate you on 1) making it through a whole episode and 2) writing about it so beautifully. You've done it again, Mr. Murray.

My only quibble is that Animal Precinct shouldn't be categorized as "Trash TV."

Posted by: Jerce at December 4, 2009 11:44 AM

I am a dog trainer and I volunteer for a local dog rescue group. I have seven rescue dogs, and one foster. The shit I have seen would turn your hair white. There is a reason that people quickly get burned out with rescuing animals. It is hard to believe that fellow human beings are capable of the shit that you see. My newest puppy was left on a porch with her mother and littermates because the owner wanted to see what would happen if nobody took care of them. All of them except mine rolled off and died. I have one that was beaten for the first seven years of his life, one that was a throw-away from a puppy mill, and several that were just left to die. Last Christmas, a car with a family in it slowed down (didn't stop) and dumped two puppies in the middle of the road. There were children in that car. What is wrong with people???

That being said, I could never be an animal cop, because I would walk into a bad situation and just flat-out shoot someone in the head. No thinking twice, just "BAM"

Posted by: Commander Strikeher at December 4, 2009 11:50 AM

Excellent write-up Mr. Murray. Unfortunately I won't be watching it as it will cause my one heart-cockle to get weepy.

Posted by: admin at December 4, 2009 11:52 AM

I also disagree with the 'trash tv' label on this one. And I, too, can never watch this again, unless I want to spend the rest of my day as a blubbering mess.

Posted by: Gabs at December 4, 2009 12:09 PM

Good article, but the header image is making me go "aaaaaaawwwwwwwwwww" out loud. LOVE puppehs.

Posted by: SofĂ­a at December 4, 2009 12:09 PM

Interesting commentary on the differences in the way animals and humans are treated. On one hand animals are made to suffer at our hand on a daily basis, but when we make them our cause they are treated with our utmost compassion. Humans also suffer on a daily basis, but where are the compassionate interventions for them? Where is the assumption that there is an inherent good in them that just needs to be fostered and nurtured, and that it's our duty to do just that? I have very mixed feelings about this. I'm always saddened by accounts of mistreated animals, but I'm constantly devastated by the way humans are suffering all over the world. It's good to keep things in perspective.

Posted by: katy at December 4, 2009 12:13 PM

I am not allowed to watch this show because of the anger and sadness it invokes. I, too, have worked in animal rescue off and on. "Off" because it can be too much after a while, and "on" because you just feel like you have to. I'm an active opponent of breed specific legislation because I specialized in fostering pitbulls and bulldogs, and I hate, hate, HATE to see the environments some of these wonderful creatures are raised in when I watch shows like this.

Excuse me...I'm gonna go home and give my spoiled mutt a giant hug now.

Posted by: feramones at December 4, 2009 12:15 PM

That picture so full of cute that I want to pump its stomch to relieve the pressure (and, of course, to devour the contents myself so I can be even a fraction as full of cute as that picture is).

Posted by: Christian H. at December 4, 2009 12:27 PM

i will check this out some day, but my tear ducts are still recovering from "the dog whisperer" marathon last sunday.

i too have worked at shelters, and the airing of these stories is heartbreaking but crucial for education.

this is a really good review, although i have to agree that it's not "trash tv" just because it's a reality show.

Posted by: celery at December 4, 2009 12:28 PM

Well said Katy, I do have the same feelings. Many people who claim they can't look at something like this don't give a second thought to what fellow humans are going through.

Incidentally, is anyone doing something about the situation of the previous owners of these pets? People don't often mistreat pets just for fun but because they hit hard times, they lack the proper resources to keep a pet or they are sick (example people who bring EVERY stray cat they find in the streets into their homes). If these people are punished it would probably only exacerbate their problems.

At the end of the day a show like this still just wants us to go "awwww" like those cute youtube videos. We just have to stick with the ugly parts too.

Posted by: barf at December 4, 2009 12:30 PM

Posted by: katy at December 4, 2009 12:13 PM


It mainly has to do with animals being truly helpless while adult humans(I'm not going to include children so I'm qualifying them out as another discussion)in the United States have the means, or at the very least access to said means, to help themselves.
Make no mistake about it, a lot of folks are just plain pathetic users that expect everything to be handed to them. You learn this after you work with these type of laid back motherfuckers.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 4, 2009 12:32 PM

I've watched this a couple of times and oh man it can be so horribly depressing. How can people do that to their pets?

Posted by: figgy at December 4, 2009 12:35 PM

I can't watch shows like this because I would be a blubbering mess and even just reading this review makes my eyes water. I love animals and actually just recently adopted a dog from a shelter. She was in a sorry state. She was about 8 pounds lighter than she should be and her coat was very thin and patchy. But, she was the sweetest thing and the only dog that would come up to the front of the kennel. The workers thought she was just abandoned to live on the street and there are times you can tell she must have suffered. Loud noises make her cower and she startles at fast movement. But, she is getting better slowly. She just passed her first vet visit with flying colors and I'm taking her to the groomers this weekend. My other dog is slowly adjusting to her, but ultimately I know it will be good for them both to have a friend.

Posted by: Peanut_Butter_And_James at December 4, 2009 12:36 PM

Those ASPCA commercials with the Sarah McLaughlin song turn me into a sniveling mess when they come on the television, and that's just for a brief minute or two. I don't think I have the fortitude to watch an entire show along the same vein.

Posted by: Ulterior Motive Girl at December 4, 2009 1:00 PM

Well said Katy, I do have the same feelings. Many people who claim they can't look at something like this don't give a second thought to what fellow humans are going through.

Posted by: barf at December 4, 2009 12:30 PM

Interesting commentary on the differences in the way animals and humans are treated.... I'm always saddened by accounts of mistreated animals, but I'm constantly devastated by the way humans are suffering all over the world. It's good to keep things in perspective.

Posted by: katy at December 4, 2009 12:13 PM

I've never really understood this kind of argument. Feeling horrible about what people do to animals and feeling horrible about the suffering of feelow human beings are in no way mutually exclusive. Do you really think people's reactions would be terribly different to a show that was called say, "Kid Precinct", and was about the horrors of child abuse and what kids had to go through who were in the foster care system?

While it's true that there is something about animals (well, not really all animals, mainly dogs and cats) that strikes certain people very acutely. I am definitely one of those people. I've watched plenty of movies and TV shows that show people torturing other people and haven't batted an eye. I don't think, however, I could watch a movie or TV show (knowing full well it was just fake) of a person torturing a dog. That doesn't mean that I have any less sympathy or concern about the suffering of real life people or if I had to chose between stopping the suffering of a person over stopping the suffering of a dog, I'd chose the dog, but it's just an odd bit of wiring.

As for this show, it doesn't sound particularly new. Animal Planet has been running "Animal Cops: Detroit" for years now. At least as early as 2005. (There was also "Animal Cops: Houston" and other shows). I see one of the animal cops and one of the vets who were on the show - a married couple - at my local YMCA on the weekends.

The shows can be very tough to watch, though most have a pretty happy ending for the animals.

Whenever there is a dog whining in pain or discomfort, my dog, Aegon, immediately sits up and stares at the TV with a look of concern on his face. His ears go forward and he starts tilting his head from side-to-side as if trying to figure out where the poor, hurt dog is. He does the same thing whenever he hears a baby cry on TV.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at December 4, 2009 1:05 PM

I was a total junkie for this show when it first came out, but I can't watch it At ALL anymore. My opinion of people in general is already low enough, shows like this make me murderous. I train animals for a living, and believe me when I say the depths of depravity people will sink to when it comes to animals has no limit.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at December 4, 2009 1:06 PM

It mainly has to do with animals being truly helpless while adult humans(I'm not going to include children so I'm qualifying them out as another discussion)in the United States have the means, or at the very least access to said means, to help themselves.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 4, 2009 12:32 PM

And right there is the key. I never gave people a second thought over animals until I had kids myself. You think dogs are trusting, loyal, and dependent, try a needy three year old.

Posted by: katy at December 4, 2009 1:12 PM

Yeah, like others, I can't watch this. At all. God bless those who work in this field and rescue animals. All I did was volunteer for a rescue organization for about a year and could not handle it any longer. You have to develop some sort of thick skin you can take off and on in order to do that.

But nothing breaks my heart faster than a helpless animal mistreated. Nothing.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at December 4, 2009 2:24 PM

I do agree it's bad when kids are mistreated. Very very bad.

However, some small part of me always thinks "they could grow up and come back and kick their ass." And the base part of me hopes they do. But the better part of my nature hopes they find peace.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at December 4, 2009 2:27 PM

Casting has begun to cast the role of Hannibal Lector for Silence of the Lambs: Dogpound Edition.

Posted by: bignick at December 4, 2009 4:36 PM

I agree with Forbiddendonut, the feelings a person can have for the suffering of animals and the suffering of humans are in no way mutually exclusive, and I feel that basically requesting a qualification of one if a person express the other is unfair. If we're talking about animal suffering, I don't think I should have to throw in a "and think of the children!" This is a discussion of animals, and how much their abusers suck, and how much I would like to kick their abusers in the nads (or the metaphorical lady nads, whatever).

These shows turn me into a quivering ball because I feel an enormous amount of pain and sadness on behalf of the animals, I just do. I have a great respect for those of you who can handle giving your time to shelters, but I can't deal with it and puss out by just giving money. And now I'm going to go home and spoil the crap out of my three cats.

Posted by: Katers at December 4, 2009 4:45 PM

Yeah, I have a weak stomach, and perhaps a weak soul - I cannot watch this stuff.

On the other hand, I cannot watch vapid rich people treat their pets like human children either. I'm not going to get hyperbolic and say it's cruelty, but it does indicate a loss of perspective.

It just seems so simple - give your pet a warm bed, food, water, and affection, and for god's sack, fucking spay and neuter.

Posted by: marya at December 4, 2009 4:47 PM

The show is obviously heartbreaking, but surprisingly, given the context of the presentation, one of the most poignant moments involved a person.

An officer was investigating a report of a malnourished horse at a festival in Little Italy in NYC. The horse, Oreo, was skinny, and the officer started questioning the woman who was in charge of feeding Oreo. She was probably in her 40's, and she looked just a little bit worn, her blond hair still done up by a pink scrunchie in a youthful pony tail on the top of her head. She was utterly devastated when it was suggested that the horse was poorly treated, and burst into tears when it was suggested.

In that moment you could see her life being distilled, how she'd traveled 40 odd years, to this point where she was feeding a horse in a carnival, a horse she loved and nourished, only to feel, once again, that people thought she was fucking up.

Thankfully, it was determined that the horse was fine, and the woman, too.

Posted by: michael murray at December 4, 2009 6:34 PM

I love, love, love this show. In fact, I've been trying to convince M. Provocateur to subscribe to Animal Planet, so I can watch it for months because my unemployed ass can't afford it right now. It is heartbreaking, but I am inspired by the overwhelming urge that the "cops", shelter workers, animal hospital workers etc. have to do good. I agree with Marya though, when you consider that the overwhelming majority of people in this world have less access to healthcare than most pets in North America, our perspectives might be askew.

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at December 4, 2009 7:00 PM

This is obviously a counterpoint, long belated, to the logically irreversible concept of de-evolution, except applied to pets and broadcast.

vi

Posted by: victor. victor immature at December 4, 2009 10:59 PM

Since humans arrived on this planet, we have never
had a Godly government, for if we did we would be
living with common sense, compassion, empathy,
reasoning and wisdom - A PARADISE FOR ALL ANIMALS
AND HUMAN-BEINGS....THE SECRET TO REGAIN THIS IS
TO LIMIT HUMAN POPULATION, LOVE AND RESPECT ALL
THE ANIMALS THAT THE CREATOR HAS PUT FORTH TO
ENJOY LIFE AS HUMANS CAN, AND ELECT NOTHING LESS
THAN A GOVERNMENT THAT CAN RESPECT ALL LIVING
BEINGS. Perhaps there's a chance if humans to the
right thing, that our earth can be rich again
so that plants contain the highest of enzymes to
sustain both herbevours and humans. Just think
clean air, clean lakes, clean earth, warm healthy
sunshine and healthy animals and humans.No more
killing of animals or testing on animals - we'd
all be healthy to live from the Creator's givings.

Posted by: darlingsapphire at December 5, 2009 3:05 PM

Don't forget to spay and neuter your religious whack jobs, too.

Posted by: marya at December 5, 2009 5:39 PM

I've often watched this show and I couldn't do the job they do. I would have to shoot some of these assholes who can't get it through their thick heads that the things they do are cruel and inhuman.
One thing I really appreciate about the show is they do show the human side. They have compassion for the people who started out with the best of intentions and then end up with more animals than they can handle. They help these people too. Often they are mentally ill and it's these officers who help them. So, while it is a show about saving animals it's also about saving people. They basically do this job to help those who can't help themselves both animals and people alike.
I respect them to no end. There is no way I could ever do that job and keep doing it year after year like they do.

Posted by: trixie at December 6, 2009 4:03 AM

We have the RSPCA Animal Rescue in Australia, and I watch it all the time. They did a special on the work they did after the bushfires, and featured a ginger tom much like our cat, Morgan (who we adopted from the RSPCA). The poor thing had escaped when his home burnt to the ground, and they found him near a creek, burnt all over. When the announcer told us he'd probably lose his eyes, Morgan chose that moment to leap onto my lap. I, bawling, hugged him so hard he literally squeaked, and after that, the ITGeek said I could only watch the show when Morgan was out of range, and could not go near him until I'd calmed down.

And seriously, is there anything on this earth that is happier than a lost dog reunited with its owners?

Posted by: ScienceGeek at December 6, 2009 5:58 PM

I saw some of those same bushfire rescue scenes, ScienceGeek. Media attetion was (rightly)focused on the people, but occasionally a story on how many animals had died or lost their homes would pop up. Tragic.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at December 6, 2009 6:36 PM

The HOTTEST interracial club__MixedConnect *.* C O M___for black Women and white Men, or black Men and white Women, to interact with each other. Interracial is not a problem here, but a great merit to cherish!

Posted by: brantty at December 7, 2009 12:43 AM

Whoa brantty, there's a time and a place.

Posted by: piedlourde at December 7, 2009 4:34 PM

obligatory vegan comment no one will read:

i don't know any of these "people who claim they can't look at something like this don't give a second thought to what fellow humans are going through," though it seems to be a general consensus that they exist and are immoral for behaving in such a way.

two points:

1) to think you can't help both animals and humans that are suffering is ridiculous. feeling as though there is only one cause worthy of attention is an excuse for not doing anything at all. additionally, we are all part of a global community and ecosystem, wherein justice for one species can mean justice for another, if only we choose to extend our compassion for non-human beings.

2) people feel particularly saddened because these are dogs and cats, but then they go to eat one of the 60 billion cows and chickens and pigs for dinner that were treated in a much more horrific and brutal way than the 5 million pets in the show.

Posted by: kristin at December 7, 2009 4:35 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time