web
counter
 

Let the Wild Rumpus Start!

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (39)



where-wild-thingsare.jpg

Until I had a child of my own, just two years ago, I had no idea who Maurice Sendak was. The only children’s book author I knew was Dr. Seuss, so it was with some embarrassment when, while discussing children’s books with other parents, I’d say something like: “Have you ever heard of Maurice Sendak or Sandra Boynton?” as though I was an early adopter. I wasn’t exposed to much children’s literature as a child myself, and to this day, the only lyrics I know to most nursery rhymes come from Andrew Dice Clay (Jack and Jill went up a hill, each with a buck and a quarter. Jill came down with $2.50. Eeeeooow! There was on old lady who lived in a shoe. She had so many kids her uterus fell out. Eeeooow!).

So, my first experience with Where the Wild Things Are came with reading it to my son. I didn’t get it at first. It was weird and disjointed. My kid has got the entire story memorized now, but even before he understood any of the words, there was something about Where the Wild Things that spoke to him. I still don’t completely get it, but especially after seeing the Where the Wild Things Are trailer, I think I know how it makes him feel — this sense of adventure, of imagination, of childlike reverie, of hope and wonder and awe of the world.

I well up every time I fucking watch the thing, in part because it allows me to better understand how it makes my kid feel, which is probably similar to the way I felt the first time I read A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius (it’s no coincidence that Dave Eggers wroteWild Things screenplay). I’m convinced that it’s the best trailer ever created — it’s no contest — and that the trailer, by itself, is a complete work of art. If the movie is a fraction as good as the two minutes above, then it’ll be worth every cent, although I fully admit to some skepticism. Maybe you can capture the feeling of a book with less than 200 words in two minutes, but how will you be able to prolong that for 90?

A featurette of Where the Wild Things Are aired at Comic-con this weekend, and Sendak himself basically addressed that question (it was the first time I’d ever seen the man, too). It’s three-minutes long, and for anyone interested in the book, and especially in the movie, it’s fascinating. The endorsement that Sendak gives to director Spike Jonze almost convinces me that the movie just might live up to the trailer.

Here, give it a look:









Comic Con IV 2009 | Downey Signs on to Due Date













Comments

im so excited for this, i just pee'd myself a little. is it wrong to be aroused?

Posted by: Heliochrome85 at July 27, 2009 5:05 PM

You could post a new column with this trailer every day and I'd watch it every time. Gods it's gorgeous.

Posted by: Jerce at July 27, 2009 5:08 PM

As somebody who's had McFarlane's Where the Wild Things Are action figures displayed on my office bookshelf for the past five years, this trailer makes me smile in my belly. I'll cut a bitch if it gets ruined. Oh yes, I'll cut a bitch. Deep.

Posted by: Skitz at July 27, 2009 5:09 PM

I tear up every time I watch it as well. It is perfectly edited to go along with "Wake Up"...seeing it on the big screen was my second favorite part of The Half Blood Prince. After Ron and the love potion.

Posted by: Julie at July 27, 2009 5:09 PM

I want it now!

Posted by: admin at July 27, 2009 5:14 PM

I had only a vague understanding of what Where the Wild Things Are growing up, and I really had no interest in it (I also thought it was a series of books, like Lemony Snicket).

But when I saw the first teaser trailer of the Gandolfini-monster quietly carrying the boy through the woods, and he says what he says, I was hooked.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at July 27, 2009 5:18 PM

This looks beautiful. I am fully looking forward to this movie still after nearly an entire year of looking forward to it.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at July 27, 2009 5:21 PM

The teary-eyed monster made me a bit teary-eyed. I can see it now.....me watching this in the theater, crying like a total twat because a big furry CGI monster is weeping on screen.

Posted by: stardust savant at July 27, 2009 5:22 PM

DR! You forgot about "Little Boy Blue...he needed the money. Eeeeooow!"
I won't write out "Hickory Dickory Dock" but... well, most of you know it already.
Heheheh.

Posted by: Spender at July 27, 2009 5:24 PM

An instant classic (the trailer I mean). This movie will be fantastic.

Posted by: Mick J at July 27, 2009 5:29 PM

I really love that they didn't try to make it really CGI and slick. I like that the monsters look like they did in the book, whimsical and fantastic. I never really loved this book as a kid, although we had it and read it, but I am *extremely* pleased that it is being adapted with the help of the author, always a good idea as far as I am concerned.

I get the feeling that this one won't be part of the 'rape my childhood' collection.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at July 27, 2009 5:31 PM

ah gods how i miss the wild rumpus. my mother raised me on sendak and shel silverstein and i miss being able to so freely access my imagination the way i could when i was young and had no trouble flipping the switch from boring real world to imaginary world of monsters or mayhem or fluffy bunnies that sang in french or whatever i was daydreaming at the time.
i can't wait to see this movie.

Posted by: JenVegas at July 27, 2009 5:33 PM

seeing it on the big screen was my second favorite part of The Half Blood Prince.
Posted by: Julie at July 27, 2009 5:09 PM

Ditto. I may have hit the person next to me several times in rapid succesion in excitement. Thank God it was someone was there with and not a total stranger. That would have been most embarrassing.

Posted by: Jeni at July 27, 2009 5:42 PM

i miss being able to so freely access my imagination the way i could when i was young and had no trouble flipping the switch from boring real world to imaginary world of monsters or mayhem or fluffy bunnies that sang in french or whatever i was daydreaming at the time.

Imagine if you were still like that? Take it from one who knows, it sucks. Like when you're sitting in rush hour traffic and imagine all the cars are telepathically flying out of your way so you accidentally drive forward a little and rear end the fucking BMW in front of you because the suburbanites of Atlanta think they have to pretend they have money. Or when your girlfriend at the time (note: at the time) has been talking to you for the last 20 minutes spilling her guts out and after about 3 you started daydreaming that you were actually fighting a zombie horde outside of your house at that very moment. It could happen right after you watch a movie, like, say The Fast and The Furious and you leave the theatre doing 90 in a 45. Maybe you just watched another vampire movie and figured you would see how hard it would take to bite your significant other to the point of drawing blood. Sometimes, having an overactive imagination just sucks.

Posted by: Deistbrawler at July 27, 2009 5:47 PM

This trailer does to me what only a few things ever have before-- the first time I heard the opening notes of Phantom of the Opera and the first time I saw the ballet Jewels being the most notable.

Now, watching that trailer again and hearing Sendak speak so highly of the film is giving me that feeling in my throat and chest where I feel like I just might burst because there's so much glee and light and brilliance there. It's a wild rumpus, all right.

Posted by: That Girl at July 27, 2009 5:53 PM

Judging by how much the trailer makes me cry, I'm betting the movie will make me bawl like a little girl.

Posted by: velocibadgergirl at July 27, 2009 5:55 PM

Hate to be this guy, but there's a rumor floating along the world wide internets that the test screenings left children in tears, and not for nostalgic reasons, either, if you catch what I'm throwing. There's no substantiating reports from the producers that anything will be changed, but that's the speculation among the blog nerds. Let it be known, my WRATH will leave children in tears if the studio tries to cock block a Spike Jonze vision.

Posted by: TheGreasedScotsman at July 27, 2009 6:06 PM

((mokin))
*cough, sits up*

sah-weet. i may just sit here all night, viewing repeatedly.

Posted by: gp at July 27, 2009 6:07 PM

This thing only becomes more amazing each time I watch it.

Posted by: Alice at July 27, 2009 6:12 PM

*sits by Alice*

i totally know.

Posted by: gp at July 27, 2009 6:13 PM

Oh Rowles, you're so cute. I bet you got all excited and tried to get your friends to read Sendak, didn't you? And then you recommended they listen to this amazing new band you discovered called "the Beatles," right?

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 27, 2009 6:49 PM

Deist, I suppose you make a valid point but still i'd take a little bit of that over the ho-hum that adulthood has turned out to be.

Posted by: JenVegas at July 27, 2009 7:03 PM

To Julie & Jeni:

I had the same heart-leap-from-chest moment. And, unfortunately, I am a super lame chic who feels like they have to "keep to themselves" and do the "proper" thing. But, no joke, I punched my hand upward so high and so fast at that trailer's end that my persnickety inner voice had no chance against the magic of that Arcade Fire/Spike Jonze combination! The best part, I didn't sink into my theater seat, I didn't regret the outburst, I just glowed at the screen.

To the GreasedScotsman:

I'm with you. We don't need anymore of the sappy, pansy-growing, over-stimulating-via-Michael-Boom-Bay-explosion with their terrible attempts at comedy to-the-point-that-it-is-offensive movies. Where are the films that are intelligent or imaginative which can strengthen a kid's resolve like The Neverending Story, The Dark Crystal (and for some reason, I hate to say it, An American Tale). These movies scared me, widened my eyes, and made me cry but these are the stories that stick. ...Not bile like G-Force. Even Sendak mentioned in the featurette to not dumb-down things for children. They are smarter, or at least have the potential to be smarter, than that.

Posted by: Sara at July 27, 2009 7:16 PM

D.R.- I think I understand at least partially why as an adult the story doesn't reach you. Basically if the story hadn't been experienced by you yourself when you were that age- it doesn't have a place to come back to when you visit it as an adult. Let me explain.

Part of the reason many books I read (or were read to me) as a child still resonate with me is that when I was exposed to them I was very young and innocent. My list of experiences were naturally very short and everything was looked at in much more definite contrasts of black & white. But those books were able to reach into me and make a place within. Perhaps it was their simplicity, maybe it was a theme I could easily identify with or maybe the author was able to hold onto just enough of their own essence of childhood from which then they were able to show something that I in my inexperience had yet to see on my own. In any event those books left an indelible impression and stayed even after I grew into a more complicated world. Like layers of paint, the years pile on, but the impressions are still under it all- still a part of who I am, even if it's just in the form of a distant memory.

I must confess that even as an adult, I at times find the world of grown-ups to be a dark, cold and uncaring environment. Often it seems we've given up our innocence and blissful ignorance in our quest for mature enlightenment, only to discover that many of the joys we hoped to upgrade to are no more (and arguably sometimes less) than the joys we experienced when we were so new to the world. I think it's one of the secret joys of parenthood- we get to go back and experience some of what we cherished, even if it's vicariously through the next generation. We'd feel self-conscience if we read children's books or play with toys by ourselves as adults- but throw in a kid who's experiencing play, make-believe and simpler stories for the first time and it's all good again. We get to dabble in moments of happiness we haven't had in decades and we get to witness someone else's reaction to doing so for the very first time.

I hope you can experience what it is that connects your child to this book. To be honest I think from the sounds of it you're already getting there. When it does happen whether during the movie, another reading of the book or even just a quiet epiphany I think you'll find an almost magical moment.

Posted by: bleujayone at July 27, 2009 7:26 PM

It's coming to IMAX! It's going to be glorious!

Posted by: vikky at July 27, 2009 7:33 PM

Oh wow. That has made me so super excited. It made my heart beat that little bit faster. I can't help but feel happy and hopeful after seeing that, and that is a rare occurence. I just adore that bit at the end of the trailer where they are all howling at the sea - it gave me chills. It reminds me of a more innocent time. Fucking. Amazing.

Posted by: redhead at July 27, 2009 7:55 PM

I am totally ROLLING MY TERRIBLE EYES AND GNASHING MY TERRIBLE TEETH right now bitches.....

I cannot fucking wait.

Posted by: Janey at July 27, 2009 8:45 PM

I actually choked back sobbing when I saw the trailer in the theater, and I've gotten the same feeling every time I've watched. I really believe this film could live up to the book.

I've loved Maurice Sendak for Wild Thing, but I love him even more for Little Bear. Not only are the books filled with simple sweetness, the animated show on Noggin captures all the innocent wonder of children like nothing else. It's absolutely the favorite in our house and we've watched all the episodes over and over.

Posted by: Cindy at July 27, 2009 8:47 PM

I honestly get choked up and have chills every single time I see this trailer.

I can not wait.

Posted by: Colin at July 27, 2009 8:50 PM

I don't want to watch this. The trailer, I mean. I don't want to see too much of this movie so I can be completely blown away at the beauty of it when I finally see the whole thing. So I'll take your word for it.

Posted by: figgy at July 28, 2009 12:07 AM

I can't watch the trailer and I don't think I'll be able to watch the film. I know this book off by heart; I have bought it for every baby born into my social circle; I used to copy the drawings when I was a kid. Even if it's spectacular I just don't think I can do it.

P.S. My first crush (age 5) was on the Wild Thing that looked like Chris Cornell circa 1992. You know the one. Not that I have a type or anything...

Posted by: embertine at July 28, 2009 3:25 AM

Aw, that featurette just made my day. Maurice Sendak seems like such a lovely man, and Spike Jones seems so respectful of his legacy. So looking forward to this.

Posted by: K at July 28, 2009 5:45 AM

I think the trailer may be my favourite cinematic experience of 2009. It's perfect in every way, making me fear for the film. Do you think the producers saw the trailer and actually started panicking just a little bit? Still, I can't wait for the film.

Posted by: Caspar at July 28, 2009 6:04 AM

Hmm...I hate to be the curmudgeon here, but...

...I've had kids for seven years. Where the Wild Things Are is a lovely book and Sendak is an absolute master at telling stories that children AND their parents want to read, no question. I just don't see how such a simple little book the moral of which can be boiled down to, "I want my mommy" (and who doesn't?), could be adapted into a two hour fantasy by the director of Being John Malkovich and Adaptation, even if written by Dave Eggers.

I remain skeptical.

Posted by: Armando at July 28, 2009 8:45 AM

And then I watched the featurette. I am now a lot less skeptical.

Posted by: Armando at July 28, 2009 8:55 AM

the featurette video has died! any other links to it available?

Posted by: aprileee at July 28, 2009 9:01 AM

Seriously, if I had been on that set, I would have spend the entire day just hugging Wild Things and there wouldn't be any filming possible.

I CAN NOT WAIT.

Posted by: Linda at July 28, 2009 9:30 AM

Mary Mary quite contrary don't need no fuckin' cuchini, if you get my drift.

-- Dice

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 28, 2009 9:46 AM

Imagine if you were still like that? Take it from one who knows, it sucks.

I beg to differ. I'm still like that, and I wouldn't want to imagine life without a wild, child-like imagination. I love that I'm "different" from the other adults that I work with. I love that I have music playing my my head all day, and that I dance in the bathroom and sing in the elevators. I love that children will choose me out of a roomful of adults to play with, and that I still enjoy a game of Hide and Seek. They appreciate that I still "get it."

Don't regret that you've been able to retain such an important aspect of your childhood, Deistbrawler. Instead regret that so many other grown-ups haven't been able to. You're one of the lucky ones.

I'll be seeing this. And I'll be sure to run out and buy my little one a copy of the book straight away.

Posted by: Kolby at July 28, 2009 10:56 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time