web
counter
 

There Is No Hope For Any Of Us: "The Walking Dead" Season 2.5 Trailer And Promo Clips

By Rob Payne | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (25)



pajibawalkingdeadtwotwotrailerpromos.jpg

While I haven’t been the biggest fan of AMC’s “The Walking Dead” television series, I think it’s pretty fair to say that it’s far from perfect and could drastically improve in quality with just a few tweaks. To be fair, I’ve been saying that since being disappointed with the show after the brilliant season one pilot, and I’ve read a good chunk of the comics, so I might be a bit biased in proliferating that sentiment. But that doesn’t mean the back half of season two shouldn’t be more exciting (tensions in the tribe!), more interesting (characters that might do something!), and more entertaining (don’t forget about the zombies!) than the front half, considering that things have come to a head on Hershel’s farm.

If that last scene of the mid-season finale is any indication, the February 12th premiere will hopefully get Rick, Shane, Lori and the rest off to a good start. And by that, of course, I mean being reminded they live in a gorram apocalypse where animated corpses eat the living. The trailer for season two-point-five is pretty okay:


The below promo video should look familiar to anybody who stuck around for “Hell on Wheels,” when the preview initially aired after the finale. It answers at least one question some of you may have had following that episode, so, if you still haven’t seen it I would suggest no watching. Even though there’s no good reason not to have seen it. For the rest of you, enjoy:


The latest promo clip also appeared during an episode of “Hell on Wheels” but I stopped watching that as soon as I saw the above promo. It’s… It doesn’t really showcase the best acting in the series’ history. Or, it could be that this particular storyline is being resolved in a very sloppy manner.

I expect this from Sarah Wayne Callies, but not Jeffrey DeMunn.

(via Bleeedng Cool)


Rob Payne also writes the indie comic The Unstoppable Force, tweets on the Twitter @RobOfWar, and his ware can be purchased here (if you’re into that sort of thing). Being a masochist, he’s going to watch the entirety of “The Walking Dead” whether it drives him crazy or not.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



They Keep Hacking Akira To Bits, But The American Remake Just Won't Die | The 10 Best Comments of the Week Features a Talking Cravat Charmer









Comments

And people were complaining about the Catherine Bach header pic...

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 6, 2012 10:04 AM

I'm going to be that guy and say I don't think 'proliferate' is a transitive verb.

Posted by: space oddity at January 6, 2012 10:14 AM

Is that header pic suppposed to look like a PS2 level CGI shot? Whoa. That is ugly for all the wrong reasons.

I decided over break I'm done with the show. Season 2.0 was a disaster, AMC has demonstrated they want to cheap out on the show and have really hurt the series in the process. Let me know if it gets better, maybe I'll tune in when Michonne or the Governor shows up to see how badly they mangle that one.

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 6, 2012 10:15 AM

I will also say I'm done with this. I got hooked in by the season one pilot and it's just taken this long for the disappointment to sink in. Watching season 2 was just not fun for me.

Posted by: space oddity at January 6, 2012 10:17 AM

Man, am I the only one who thinks this show is still good? I, unlike all the rest of you, like the show's slow pace; it allows for development of even the smallest of changes in characters to be significant. Granted, I'm not going to say that that is exactly what the writers managed to do, because... well... I've seen season 2. But still, I thought it handled reveal of Laurie's "secret" very well, not to mention Shane's downfall.

Maybe it's because the moment season 1 was over, I got out and bought myself all the current issues of The Walking Dead comics that I feel this way. Even the comic wasn't very fast paced or focused that much on the zombies. The moment they get to the prison (which I'm hoping is season 3), it's all about the isolation and change of society in a zombie apocalypse, rather than the looming threat. Then again, maybe I'm just weird; I thought Benjamin Button was well-paced, for one.

Also, I think I know how season 2 might end (with a gunshot), and it will be worth all the wait...

Posted by: FDBluth at January 6, 2012 10:33 AM

space oddity - Is it a grammar issue or just an odd word choice? Is transitive even an issue? It's a present continuous modal verb, right? I'm not sure any more. I might be talking out my @ss.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 6, 2012 10:35 AM

I don't know what's wrong with the rest of you but I can't wait till 2.5 starts. I'm so addicted to this show.

Posted by: sarah at January 6, 2012 10:36 AM

@space oddity and Mrs. Julien: It's possible I used "proliferate" awkwardly, but I was thinking of it in terms of this definition, "to spread rapidly and often excessively." Emphasis on the excessively, in regards to my consistent badgering about the woes of "The Walking Dead" TV series. I think my usage here was fine, but I can see why it might make one go, "Eh?"

@FDBluth: I agree that Shane's development has been one of my favorite parts of the show, besides Norman Reedus's Daryl. I just don't like how Dale's been thrust into the middle of it rather illogically. And I think if the mid-season finale had been episode four, it would have made for a stronger and more compelling storyline. And you're probably right about the ending, and that should be fairly good. Emphasis on the should.

Posted by: RobP at January 6, 2012 10:55 AM

When it comes to "The Walking Dead" the DVR is your friend. Fast forward through the endless chatter, watch anything that looks interesting (about 7 minutes per episode now) and pat yourself on the back that you are at least smarter than the doofus characters in this show.

Posted by: Spudboy at January 6, 2012 11:01 AM

I was extremely disappointed and irritated with the first half of this season. But I plan to keep watching with some hope that the show will redeem itself. I'll wait until the end of the season to decide whether or not to throw it in the same bin as The Killing.

Posted by: lubeg at January 6, 2012 11:03 AM

...so I might be a bit biased in proliferating that sentiment.

...so I might be biased in my proliferation of that sentiment?

Posted by: PissBoy at January 6, 2012 11:22 AM

The first half of Season 2 was, to be kind, extremely uneven. The slow pacing has been noted by others. I don't mind deliberate pacing, but pacing so slow it had the effect of turning almost half a season nearly into a bottle episode is maddening. The confused timelines ie: how long would it take for Carl to recover from a gunshot wound to the belly after being treated by a vet(erinarian) with only meagre supplies? Weeks? A month or more? Either way, Sophia is dead, or a walker. Hershel wants Ricks crew gone, then GTFO. The zombies also got stupider. When the walker finds Daryl unconscious on the riverbank and starts gnawing on his boot? WTF? And Laurie. And Andrea. And the ongoing gun control PSA. And laundry, dear Godtopus, so much laundry. But the development of Shane, Daryl and to a lesser extent Glenn were high points. Also, some cool zombie kills. So I guess what I'm saying is, I'm cautiously looking forward to Season 2.5, and hope they can right the ship. But, if Season 2.5 is more of the same, I won't be around for Season 3.

Posted by: Groundloop at January 6, 2012 11:24 AM

Is it strange that the grammar discussion turned me on? You people and your transitive verbs, swoon.

Posted by: catagisreading at January 6, 2012 11:51 AM

Count me in the "still love it" camp. I haven't read the graphic novels, and I'm not going to sully my enjoyment of the show by doing so right now. No, the show is not perfect, and there are annoying characters, as there are annoying people in real life. I like a slow pace, and even as a rabid horror fan, I would get bored if there were just constant zombie attacks.

Posted by: PrincessPiglet at January 6, 2012 11:51 AM

Were still gonna watch it but another zombie-in-the-well episode might make me want to give the show a head shot.

Posted by: logan at January 6, 2012 12:49 PM

So now we have Grammar Zombies?

Posted by: Odnon. at January 6, 2012 12:59 PM

Yes.

Veeeerb . . . . nooooooun . . .

Posted by: Lauren at January 6, 2012 1:36 PM

Nooooooooooominaaaaaatiiiiiiiiiive

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 6, 2012 1:45 PM

Haven't you seen Dead Snow? We're Zombie Grammar Nazis!

Posted by: MM at January 6, 2012 1:46 PM

FDBluth, I'm not a huge fan of the show myself(just not generally a fan of the zombie genre) but my BF is still a big fan and he's got the same views as you with regard the slow development if character over all the action.

Having checked in now and again(almost exclusively for Mr Reedus) I can see the issues the show has but also that there isn't a lot of reason for them to be there, the cast is mostly excellent so it should't be hard to write them even just half decent material they can turn into gold. As it is, from what I see, it seems as if the writers aren't sure where to actually take the show and are stalling for time with slow grow plots.

Obviously for some this is frustrating and a let down, for others it isn't.

I think the reason this show continues to frustrate so many but still have a pretty die hard audience is similar to why Lost did around the middle when it got really confused with its self; it's a great concept, great cast, great setting, it just seems as if it's...only that. Great idea but not a whole lot of substance.

Posted by: Nadine at January 6, 2012 2:20 PM

I'm still a fan of the show. Now, for the real reason I posted: What do vegan zombies crave? Graaaaiiiins!

Posted by: Bob Frapples at January 6, 2012 4:43 PM

Oh God. I can’t even say how disappointed I am. THEY ARE STILL ON THAT STUPID FARM? I hoped that now after they found Sofia they would finally leave that farm. And here we are. At least one entire episode will will be on that damn farm.

Should I just stop, read reviews and return when recap will say to me that they finally moved? Shane is stupid and crazy and lost his charm when he shaved his head... But he is the only one who brings life to that boring show. He is the only one who acts and does something. All the other just talk and talk and talk.

Posted by: Shy at January 6, 2012 8:34 PM

I'm with Tyler and space...wake me if this show suddenly gets good (hell, mediocre even)...otherwise pass. The thing that finally put me over the edge wasn't the roughly 40 minutes per episode of absolutely NOTHING going on (a DVR solves that problem), it was the writers' utter inability to create consistent rules for TWD's world or characters that have any semblance of a survival instinct or basic common sense. The characters (i.e. writers) are *so* stone stupid as to take you completely out of the suspension of disbelief.

Is the source material this idiotic?

Anyway, it's pretty fuckin' bad when cannibalistic rotting motile corpses are the most believable aspect of your "human drama".

Posted by: Barry at January 6, 2012 10:56 PM

My bet is that the slow season 2 is mostly related to budget issues. Filming at a single location like the farm lowers productions costs; scenes of two non-zombies talking - lower production costs. Scenes of two people walking in a sunlit field? really low production costs if you can do it with natural lighting.

One of the best things about Battlestar Galactica was listening to the producer's real-time discussion of the episodes. They really helped to put into perspective the way that budget dictates nearly everything in TV. And I guess in a sense it should.

Remember that ad-supported TV shows are really just filler to get you to watch the real content, advertising. Sure, the actors, directors and producers are trying to make a great show, but the people paying them to do it have one thought in mind: "Does this show bring in more ad revenue than it costs to make"?

Posted by: Pragmatist at January 7, 2012 11:53 AM

I'm only still watching because Norman Reedus is a sexy beast. As soon as Daryl dies, I'm out.

Posted by: Tilly at January 8, 2012 4:13 AM