web
counter
 

Details of Your Incompetence Do Not Interest Me

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (31)



Meryl-Streep-Devil-Wears-Prada.jpg

It’s a slow morning and, to stave off having to run a red-band clip for The Ugly Truth, I’ve decided to show you the trailer for The September Issue (don’t worry — if it remains slow, that Ugly Truth trailer will be along soon). The September Issue is a documentary about Anna Wintour, who — if you’re like me — you may only know because it’s the person that Meryl Streep’s character in The Devil Wears Prada is based on.

This doc’s major focus, it seems, is on that September issue of Vogue, which is apparently a really big deal in the fashion world. I know nothing of it, but from the looks of this trailer, these people may be the only subset of Americans more obnoxious than hipster douchebags (L.A. variety). Wintour does seem icy, though — but I think I preferred it when she was played by Streep. Maybe Wintour should get Streep to play her in real life, too.

Also, is it really true that people care about this stuff? Waify women walking around in funny hats and dresses no one in real life wears? If the Fug Girls live-blog it, I’ll watch. Otherwise, I think I’ll remain blissfully ignorant:


Oh, look. Here’s some PR copy about the movie:

Anna Wintour, the legendary editor-in-chief of Vogue magazine for twenty years, is the most powerful and polarizing figure in fashion. Hidden behind her trademark bob and sunglasses, she has never allowed anyone to scrutinize the inner workings of her magazine. Until now. With unprecedented access, filmmaker R.J. Cutler’s new film THE SEPTEMBER ISSUE does for fashion what he did for politics in The War Room, taking the viewer inside a world they only think they know. Every August a record-breaking number of people can’t wait to get their hands on the September issue of Vogue. The 2007 issue was and remains the biggest ever, weighing over four pounds, selling thirteen million copies, and impacting the $300-billion global fashion industry more than any other single publication. An intimate, funny and surprising look at Anna Wintour and her team of larger-than-life editors as they create this must-have Bible of fashion, Cutler explores the untouchable glamour of Wintour’s Vogue to reveal the extraordinarily passionate people at its heart.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Marvel/Avengers Update | Hitman Sequel









Comments

Whoopee.

Posted by: Snath at June 25, 2009 11:35 AM

1. VOGUE SUCKS. They have no clue.

2. My sister and I went to see "The Devil Wears Prada" and as soon as we saw Meryl Streep come on screen, we both shouted, "MOM?" Same haircut and fashion sense.

3. Later that same day, Mom called me and said, "Turn on such&such show. Anna Wintour is on and she looks just like you." I immediately went out and got a different haircut.

Posted by: BWeaves at June 25, 2009 11:47 AM

"Fashion is not about looking back, it's about looking forward."

Umm, I'm no expert, but I think fashion is about keeping your old clothes in your closet until some moron decides to recycle an old idea.

Posted by: admin at June 25, 2009 11:47 AM

It would be funny if it weren't real.

Posted by: courtney at June 25, 2009 11:47 AM

Well I don't know about the rest of you, but I wish that trailer didn't just dangle out there the question of what we are supposed to do with feathers this autumn and not provide any answers. I'm really worried now. What if I have taken my feathers in the wrong direction? What if I don't have enough? Too many? It's going to ruin my summer fretting over this Fall's feather trend. Thanks a heap Dustin.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 25, 2009 11:52 AM

I find fashion incredibly boring. I am always pissed when the New Yorker's fashion issue comes in the mail. No interest whatsoever - and I'm somebody who likes clothes and likes to look nice.

Posted by: samantha t at June 25, 2009 11:54 AM

Paddy - don't worry, I believe that that was for last September, so you've already missed the feather bandwagon. Or, I could be wrong, and it's for this September, in which case, I'm afraid you're going to have to see the movie the moment it opens, so that you know exactly what to do with your feathers.

Sadly, I have to say I'm a bit intrigued by this. On the other hand, as I've mentioned before, I'm so behind on movies, it's unlikely I'll ever get around to seeing it. So, there ya go.

Posted by: tamatha at June 25, 2009 11:59 AM

as a vogue subscriber for 15 years, i'm actually very psyched to see it.

Posted by: gem at June 25, 2009 12:03 PM

I honestly like buying magazines like Vogue purely for some of the spreads and advertisements. I think they're beautiful and if I had money I probably would spend a certain amount on designer clothing. I mean, some of it is completely crazy-pants, but some of it is gorgeous and borders on artwork that you can wear.

But Wintour has a tendency to push for thinner, whiter models while at the same time featuring mostly actresses on the cover of the magazine and that's annoying to me. If it's a fashion magazine then put the fashion on the cover, not some starlet of the moment.

Posted by: Genny (actually Rusty now) at June 25, 2009 12:05 PM

This stuff is important, to the extent that it is, because the dumb shit they're shown in Milan this year will be tweaked and turned into the stuff actual people wear two years later.

That said, "September is January for fashion." What the fuck does that even mean? It's cold and everybody is broke from over-spending in August?

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 25, 2009 12:05 PM

Tracer,
"September is January for fashion."

You're hungover for the first week while your kids play with the loud (why the loud ones?) toys they got for Christmas, then your car breaks down because the radiator froze but you spent all your money on Christmas presents so you can't fix it and have to take the bus to work, then you throw out your lower back shoveling the driveway like your dumbshit wife asked even though your car isn't fucking going anywhere, then you observe Martin Luther King, Jr. day in a respectful and somber manner, then you watch some NFL playoff games but the massively retarded QB of your favorite team crushes your one possible moment of joy, and then you start dreading Valentine's Day.

Man. September fucking sucks for those clowns.

Posted by: Kballs at June 25, 2009 12:20 PM

I know a LITTLe about it, only because my boyfriend is a doorman near where the Bryant Park Fashion Week tents are, and because I work for a wholesale fashion merchandising company.

It goes like this:

Besides the fashion weeks in Paris and Milan, Bryant Park Fashion Week in New York city is an entire week of every major fashion designer (and some newcomers) showing off their seasons lines to buyers, the press and celebrities. Think of it like an open house only your display is strutting down a runway. Buyers from all over the world come and decide what designers they'll showcase in their stores (this can run the gamut from Target to Nordstrom to Saks.) Designers usually show 20-40 pieces/outfits, and their asses are on the line because the more people like their clothes, more companies will buy them. If they suck, the press crucifies them and they don't sell their product.

The Fashion Week in January (combined with the Weeks in Paris and Milan) pretty much decide what the "in" people will be wearing that year; it could be a specific time period, a color, a texture, etc. That "look" will be incorporated into the mainstream markets during the year (like the trucker hat, the skinny jeans, oversized purse, leggings, etc). The September issue of Vogue for the "in" people is basically a culmination of what was shown at the fashion tents. It literally is the "Bible" if your job is clothing and designs, because it shows what you need, what to buy, how much it all costs, and the trickle down effect of trends.

Here's a big scene in the Devil Wears Prada that basically explains it. People in the fashion world literally hang on one trend from moment to next because it makes or breaks careers. I actually don't care and that's why I'm the Executive Assistant :-)

"This... 'stuff'? Oh... ok. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You go to your closet and you select out, oh I don't know, that lumpy blue sweater, for instance, because you're trying to tell the world that you take yourself too seriously to care about what you put on your back. But what you don't know is that that sweater is not just blue, it's not turquoise, it's not lapis, it's actually cerulean. You're also blithely unaware of the fact that in 2002, Oscar De La Renta did a collection of cerulean gowns. And then I think it was Yves St Laurent, wasn't it, who showed cerulean military jackets? I think we need a jacket here. And then cerulean quickly showed up in the collections of 8 different designers. Then it filtered down through the department stores and then trickled on down into some tragic casual corner where you, no doubt, fished it out of some clearance bin. However, that blue represents millions of dollars and countless jobs and so it's sort of comical how you think that you've made a choice that exempts you from the fashion industry when, in fact, you're wearing the sweater that was selected for you by the people in this room. From a pile of stuff."

Hoped the classroom lesson helped!

Posted by: scorzi at June 25, 2009 12:35 PM

Ick. Anna Wintour is one of the most vile, loathsome women on the planet. She's the main force behind all these hideous magazines and their ridiculous standards of beauty. She's awful.

I like and I mostly understand fashion, but this woman is just horrible.

Posted by: figgy at June 25, 2009 12:48 PM

Hey now. NY hipsters are way more annoying than ours.

Ours prattle about how much meaning they got after reading freaking Catcher in the Rye for the 47th time and how amazing LA Mill Coffee is.

Theirs blather about....actually I don't know what they blather about because I was too busy walking away as fast as my legs could carry me. In LA I have to wait to sober up so I can leave.

You know what, you're right. LA hipsters ARE more annoying, if only because you're usually trapped six deep at the bar at 4100, wishing, just wishing, the bartender who might be sort of cute under all that irony would SHOWER, and you can't leave because your DD isn't ready yet and you've sucked down 14 vodka tonics just to deal with all the douchebaggery.

Not that that's ever happened. To me.

Posted by: SavageCats at June 25, 2009 12:49 PM

Hey, just thought you might like to know.. Farrah Fawcett died this morning.

Posted by: legib at June 25, 2009 12:56 PM

I'm not a regular Vogue reader, but I believe September is their big fall fashion issue, and it's huge, like close to 1000 pages or something like that (per Google, their 2007 version weighed over 3 pounds).

And yes, people care about this shit. They're called "rich people." And unfortunately, yes, these fashion nitwits decide, in part, what the rest of us wear (thanks for all the ugly-ass styles in Target the past couple years, Anna, you hag).

RE "September is January for fashion" - it means that fall is kinda like the start of the fiscal year for the fashion world. It's considered the most important season, I assume because it's full of more expensive winter clothes (coats, formal dresses for holiday parties, etc.).

Posted by: Slash at June 25, 2009 1:04 PM

What would DD mean in the context of Savagecats post? On other message boards it means 'Dear Daughter'. If you're chaperoning your daughter to hipster bars in LA, then my hat is off to you as coolest parent ever.

Posted by: mums at June 25, 2009 1:29 PM

I'm pretty sure that's designated driver. That fits in with the few things I know about LA--nobody walks.

Posted by: racahel at June 25, 2009 2:12 PM

SHUT YOUR MOUTH, I am not a mother.


Designated Driver.

Posted by: SavageCats at June 25, 2009 2:13 PM

Wow, she looks like such a happy person. Move over, Rabindranath Tagore. There's a new role model in my life and she's got a bob.

Posted by: SofĂ­a at June 25, 2009 2:23 PM

I don't buy (or even scan through) Vogue or any other fashion mags. They peddle impossible dream (both in size of body & wallet) to women, leaving them @#$% depressed that they can't be size 2 with $1 million dress budget.

My favorite example--I remember (this was like 20 years ago, mind you) seeing a photo spread about "return to simplicity". Vogue suggested that instead of a dress, put on a simple white button-down shirt and wrap a big scarf around as a skirt. Of course, the simple white shirt was a $500 Calvin Klein shirt and the scarf was a Hermes which cost over $2000. Assuming Hermes makes a scarf large/wide enough to encircle average woman's hips (I doubt it).

Posted by: True_Blue at June 25, 2009 2:41 PM

I love discussing TDWP with people who take things at face value. Oh, she's the villain? "Miranda" took a kid straight out of college and full of idealism and taught her (or inspired her, through sheer terror and emotional torture) how to rule the world. I don't think I'd have lasted a week, but I'd apply anyway.

"Everybody wants this. Everybody wants to be us."

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at June 25, 2009 3:39 PM

I don't buy the mags, and if somebody would just make a black zip-front jumpsuit I'd wear it every damn day of my life...but that said, this woman is one of the biggest ball busters in the world. I like powerful women. I'm gonna see this.

Posted by: replica at June 25, 2009 3:41 PM

Nobody walks in LA? Maybe if it was all centralized and had public transportation like NYC, that would be great. But when everything is spread the hell out and traffic is always miserable, one must band together and kiss the ass of one's DD (designated driver, yes).

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at June 25, 2009 3:54 PM

I proudly read Esquire, GQ, Maxim, Details, Stuff, FHM and Rolling Stone and I'm a girl. I love reading the true life/true crime stories, music reviews, technical reviews, jokes, movie reviews, cool bbq recipes and seeing a hot chick is always a plus. Vogue, Cosmo and the rest of the stupid chick mags cater to women who only care about makeup, fashion, and playing games to get a guy. "How to land the man of your dreams"? How about fucking walk up to him and ask him out on a date!

Posted by: scorzi at June 25, 2009 4:47 PM

Now now, some intelligent, non-superficial, and in my case, very poor people do care about this stuff. I took fashion studies for years in high school, and I can draft my own patterns, do my own alterations, and create my own garments. The process is difficult and steeped with creativity and requires tremendous skills.

I also find fashion incredibly interesting. Look at how style has evolved over time and the meanings that go with it. In Victorian times, pink was associated with powerful masculinity, while blue was seen as tranquil and serene, so more feminine. Fashion also reflects changing times, think of flappers, women during the war effort, hippies, and even shoulder pads. They all represent something bigger that's going on in society, so fashion is very much worthwhile to pay attention to.

Do you have to read Vogue, or wear what is on the pages of Vogue? No, but Scorzi is right, the stuff on those pages ends up in stores anyway. Couture inspires fabric, shape, volume and colour trends, which ends up in our closets as ready to wear garments.

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at June 25, 2009 4:59 PM

Agreed with Agente Provovcatrice , having an interest in fashion and being able to string together a coherent sentence are not mutually exclusive. Fashion is simply another art form and another element of society and culture.

And I respect Wintour for making people afraid of her. I aspire to that.

Posted by: MG at June 25, 2009 5:17 PM

I would totally read a Fug Girls live blog of this movie. But I too think this could be a somewhat interesting movie, if only for the fact that Anna Wintour is a crazily interesting person. I also love flicking through old editions of Vogue when I'm at the doctor, dentist, etc. Whilst it basically sells the unattainable dream, I'll be damned if some of it isn't art. Art, people.

Posted by: redfeathers at June 25, 2009 7:46 PM

Oh I care, I care very much.
I can't wait to see the evil that is Anna Wintour up on the big screen.
And just what the hell is Andre Leon Talley yelling?
"you know what honey, it is a famine of beauty"????

Posted by: Jules at June 25, 2009 10:05 PM

I find fashion incredibly boring. I am always pissed when the New Yorker's fashion issue comes in the mail. No interest whatsoever ...

Posted by: samantha t at June 25, 2009 11:54 AM
---
I give TNY credit for actually making the fashion issue articles (most of them) interesting enough for even a fashion idiot like me to read.

Now the fiction issues ... OctoJeebus. Whatever happened to stories with beginnings, middles and ends?

Fashion? Everything I know about fashion or need to know about fashion I learned from "Pret-a-Porter."

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 26, 2009 1:33 AM

First of all, do NOT put Vogue and Cosmo in the same category. Vogue is not about the "Top 10 sexiest moves in the bedroom!" Yes, the fashion spreads and articles are a big part of it, and I love looking at them even though I'm a poor teacher and wouldn't never buy a $3500 dress in my entire life -- even my wedding dress was $125. That said, these clothes are wearable art that (as others have pointed out) end up coming down the line to inspire what we can buy retail. Also, they have great articles about books, art, movies, theatre, food, even politics and science. It's not just about clothes, but about what's "in vogue." I love my subscription and am quiet happy with my size 6/8 figure, thank you very much.

Posted by: Ariel at June 26, 2009 11:04 AM