web
counter
 

Needs More Jet Li, Less Crappiness

By TK | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (23)



maggie-q-jump-kick.jpg

Can someone please explain Maggie Q to me? I mean, her American movies have been pretty much disastrous. She was somewhat charming and entertaining in Mission: Impossible III, and possibly the second-best thing in Die Hard With A Vengeance (the first-best being, of course, Timothy Olyphant). But other than that? Shit. A steady stream of cinematic shit. Balls of Fury? Seriously, Maggie. You are lovely and appear to be quite skilled at kicking ass. There must be more out there for you.

I say this because what we have here is the trailer for The King Of Fighters, based on a long-running series of video games. It’s directed by Gordon Chan, who directed the excellent Jet Li vehicle Fist of Legend (Jing wu ying xiong), and I’ll be honest — it looks absolutely horrendous. It co-stars Sean Faris (Never Back Down… oh no), Will Yun Lee (Elektra, “Bionic Woman,” “Witchblade”… blergh) and motherfuckin’ Ray Park, aka Darth Maul. The problem with Park, of course, is that he’s not really an actor — he’s a martial arts dynamo, no question, and a hell of a stunt guy, but not an actor (there’s a reason he was cast as Snake Eyes). And he looks particularly terrible here. Exhibit A:

kof02mpic2.jpg

Anyway, it looks like some sort of monstrous combination of Mortal Kombat, D.O.A: Dead or Alive, and The One. Well, you know what they say — if you’re gonna steal, steal from the absolute worst. But you’ll watch this trailer because it is howlingly bad. Because the make-up is insane, the effects are cartoonish, and there’s some scattered decent asskickery to be found. And because like me, despite things like Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever, you have a strange soft spot for Ray Park. I don’t expect this to make it to the big screen, but rather to go straight to the DVD bargain bin.

Really, only one question remains to be answered: Can it be as bad as Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li? Is that even possible? We shall see, gentle readers.

We. Shall. See.

I gotta say — I didn’t see anything in there that was potentially universe-destroying, despite what that Mr. Voice wannabe said.









Universal Soldier: Regeneration Trailer | Exclusive: Miramax Secures the Film Rights to Ian McEwan's Next Novel, "Solar"













Comments

Well that trailer looks unrelentingly horrible...

Posted by: Adam C at November 30, 2009 9:56 AM

I swear the shots near the end with the car flying through the air were stop motion using a matchbox car or something. I will be seeing this.

Posted by: Chugga at November 30, 2009 10:00 AM

I actually think Park is doing a pretty good job on Heroes this season. Fuck, I didn't even know it was him until I bothered to look it up. I kept thinking it was someone else.

Posted by: Snath at November 30, 2009 10:03 AM

Even the voice-over guy was like, "I can't believe I'm reading this shit" You bet your ass I'm going to see it.

Posted by: admin at November 30, 2009 10:05 AM

Maggie Q's career is less than stellar because she's in the wrong genre of movie. Martial arts? Big-budget action? Dan Fogler comedies? Feh.

Where she would truly shine is in the "erotic thriller" genre, co-starring me. And the "erotic drama" genre, co-starring me. And the "erotic workplace comedy," co-starring me. And Rainn Wilson, because that guy's hilarious. Though not terribly erotic.

Posted by: Soulless Merchant of Fear at November 30, 2009 10:09 AM

Coming Soon? More like Going Quickly! Fuck yeah!

*high fives a live shark's mouth*

Posted by: Kballs at November 30, 2009 10:11 AM

Say what you want about the guy in the photo, I don't have two hot chicks hanging off me. Not that the moment anyway.

I don't know what bores me more, the 500 comic book movies or the 500 video game movies that come out each year. You guys who watch that mindsplat, you all owe Twihards a huge apology.

Posted by: , at November 30, 2009 10:39 AM

*--at the moment

Posted by: , at November 30, 2009 10:40 AM

I think the only fighting-game-turned-moviefilm I've ever seen is Mortal Kombat. That movie holds a special place in my heart, both for being ridiculously awesome (and bad), and for having my favorite movie soundtrack. It's so much better than The Crow.

Actually, I think I'd buy the soundtrack again only for "Halcyon + On + On," because it's my favorite song. For sheezy.

Posted by: Snath at November 30, 2009 11:06 AM

I should state that obviously I have terrible taste in music. I know this.

Posted by: Snath at November 30, 2009 11:07 AM

I don't know what bores me more, the 500 comic book movies or the 500 video game movies that come out each year. You guys who watch that mindsplat, you all owe Twihards a huge apology.

Posted by: , at November 30, 2009 10:39 AM
-------

I tend to agree with you about the usual quality of those movies, but I think for different reasons. There's nothing wrong with the source material. Most video games and movies are no worse that way than most books. The problem is the process used to pick them and make them into movies.

Take video games. There are video games out there with great stories and/or great worlds in which to tell stories. Now... games themselves have to do something different from books and movies. They have to give the person with the controller or keyboard some agency. But if you strip out the things required for that and just tell a straight story..... Well, most of what Bioware puts out has as good a story as the top 5% of Hollywood fantasy movies. Some of the big Nintendo franchises (notably Zelda and Metroid) have a lot of meat on their bones. But those games don't make enough money or have as much mainstream name recognition as others.

Everyone knows who Mario is. So they make a Mario Bros movie.... even though the Mario games are not remotely about narrative and have almost no narrative structure. They are just games. That's like making "Wheel of Fortune: The Movie" when you have dozens of actual story-driven scripts on your desk. This is the same thinking that tries to make "Battleship" and "Monopoly" movies.

If they wanted to actually make movies that people could enjoy, they would look at the games themselves for those with narrative. Team Ico has made some beautiful, atmospheric games. Google up the trailers for "The Last Guardian" or "Shadow of the Colossus." Not only are they great games, but they do a better job of trailers than Hollywood does. They give you a taste of the game and some atmosphere without spoiling anything of the plot.

The problem is that Hollywood does not trust their audience, and they do not trust their source material. Instead of focusing on what is there that is good, they gin up the gimmicky aspects. When they look at a game they see two things: 1) "That game made a bunch of money;" and 2) "That will look great as a visual effect." They do not see "that could tell a great story on screen."

The same applies somewhat to comic book movies, but the audience is a problem there, too. If you change it enough to make a good movie out of it, the geek brigade will burn you in effigy and actively try to prevent people from going to your movie, so you have to play an asinine appeasement game. Rather than make a good movie from the available source material, you are forced to become a slave to some aspects of the source material.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at November 30, 2009 11:34 AM

ZombieScientist, you spun off a way-more-thoughtful comment than my snarky comment deserved.

/tips hat

Posted by: , at November 30, 2009 11:46 AM

I think it's great that videogame fighting movies are back. And what's even better about these movies is that they don't give a damn if it's any good and they don't care if it makes money. That's what art is, the value is in doing it, not in people liking it or being willing to give their money for it.

Posted by: zito at November 30, 2009 11:52 AM

I like Ray Park as a martial artist, but the guy has been reduced to going to Star Trek conventions to do demos of the Darth Maul tricks. Granted that's still better than a spot on Heros, but still he deserves better.

Snath, I've defended the Mortal Kombat movie and soundtrack before. You can never have enough bass.

Posted by: mrcreosote at November 30, 2009 11:57 AM

"Needs More Jet Li, Less Crappiness" So much truth. Perfect title.

It looks even worse than those really bad, special effects laden, Hong Kong "martial arts" movies starring pop-stars. And it looks so cheap, like a made-for-tv movie that would play on SciFi.

But it's got lightning shields and arms on fire so I'll probably see it.

Gordan Chan should just get together with Jet Li, make Fist of Legend again, only update it with lightning and fire bolts.

Posted by: laurel at November 30, 2009 1:04 PM

I would have to agree with Snath that Park has done a pretty good job on "Heroes" this season, despite the fact that I think his character is now gone. Look at his roles though.

Sleep Hollow - Headless Horseman
Mortal Kombat: Annihilation - Raptor #3
Star Wars: Episode I-The Phantom Menace - Darth Maul
X-Men - Toad
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra - Snake Eyes

The only one of those that had a speaking role was Toad. Even then, in "Heroes" his dialogue is pretty thin...most of the time he just sits the and looks mean.

Fist of Legend!! My favorite martial arts film.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at November 30, 2009 1:55 PM

So Ray Park cant act unless he's whispering his lines in a deadly hiss while painted up to look like AN ACTUAL DEMON.
But having watching the man kick EVERYBODIES ASS IN THE ROOM I will not be telling to his face that he can not act.
I'll leave that up to y'all and will steal from your destroyed corpses once he's sated and sleeping

Posted by: Nadine at November 30, 2009 2:58 PM

I think you meant "Live Free or Die Hard", not "Die Hard With A Vengeance".

Posted by: Neal at November 30, 2009 5:04 PM

Ray Park is so not-an-actor that they had Peter Serafinowicz (awesome) re-do his Darth Maul dialogue.

It was kind of neat.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at November 30, 2009 11:01 PM

I like how it specifies/emphasizes 'acclaimed ACTION director.' Ya know, in case you couldn't tell. Like maybe it was a rom-com or something.

Posted by: Gabs at November 30, 2009 11:49 PM

What's this movie about? I couldn't tell from the trailer. At all.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 1, 2009 12:19 AM

The sad thing is that the King of Fighters games had a decent plot for a stretch (the '95, '96 and '97 installments); one that could be conceivably refined into a pretty decent story on film without sacrificing any action.

But, alas, KoF still remains that series of games found on those stand-up arcade machines that survive only in laundromats nowadays. Not surprised it's getting the 'throwaway action film' treatment. Is it really being released in theaters? Yeesh.

Posted by: vic at December 1, 2009 1:23 AM

Holy hell, that's some stupendously bad writing--"They live among us, living normal lives"? Redundant much?

All I got from the trailer was that these dudes had some technology that took them to another dimension, and all that dimension contains is a single abandoned warehouse in which they fight. Seriously, people, market that astonishing technology and you could buy whole cities of warehouses in which to kick ass--in style. With cool weapons instead of garbage cans.

Who travels to another dimension and decides to hang out in the grimiest, most boring section of town and get their ribs pummeled? I'd be looking for otherworldly gadgets to sell, or hanging with my alternate-dimension self, or seeing if they'd invented holodecks yet.

Posted by: DeadBessie at December 1, 2009 9:39 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time