web
counter
 

The Weakest Zombie Movie Director Today?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (16)



survival-of-the-dead-2.jpg

It’s ironic to me that the subgenre of film that seems to have the most energy, creativity, and originality today is the one essentially created by George Romero, and yet, Romero’s new zombie films are the only ones that I don’t care to see any more. In the 40 years since Night of the Living Dead, Romero has somehow regressed. The original Dead trilogy still stands as the greatest contributions ever to zombie movies (yes: Including Shaun of the Dead, which couldn’t have existed without Romero), but Romero’s last two films — Land of the Dead and Diary of the Dead — are two of the worst zombie movies in recent memory.

And it’s hard to make a zombie movie I don’t give a shit about.

But, it appears, he’s done it again with Survival of the Dead, which sets the zombies on an island off the coast of North America. From the looks of the trailer, there’s nothing new here. In fact, it appears that he’s rolling out the same shots and the same zombie kills that he’s been rolling out since 1968. I’d argue, in fact, that the the trilogy had much more sophistication than Survival of the Dead, which looks like a quick cash out thrown together by an aging icon with about $100 and a few six-packs.









Up in the Air Clip | Lord of the Rings Lawsuit Settled













Comments

Poor Romero. It's sad to see one of your favorite directors take a dive but then I think about Bruiser and Monkeyshines and I don't feel so bad. I think I'll go watch Dawn again...

Posted by: Kurdt at September 8, 2009 8:48 PM

It looks like a made for TV movie (with a little more gore) but if you want me to be honest, all a movie has to have is "zombie" in it somewhere and I'm going to see it. Whether that be in the plot description or the title itself.

What can I say? I'm a sucker for the undead.

Posted by: Deistbrawler at September 8, 2009 8:55 PM

Yeah, that was pretty weak sauce alright (and I actually liked Land of the Dead!). Remember when Romero actually built upon the themes of the previous entry with every Dead film he made? Now it seems as if he's regressing. Diary was cinematic white noise...and this doesn't look much different.

Posted by: Case at September 8, 2009 8:56 PM

weak.

but you know i'll see it.

Posted by: gp at September 8, 2009 9:11 PM

Oh, George, George, George.

*weeps copious tears for a fellow yinzer*

"Zombieland" is just gonna clean your clock.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 8, 2009 11:14 PM

If you showed me that trailer and told me it was directed by Uwe Boll i would not have doubted it.

Posted by: returnofthesmith at September 9, 2009 12:30 AM

Deist, I'm with ya on that one. At the slightest mention of "zombie" I'm like "I.want.to.go.there".

Also I have this baseball card type thing that my sister gave me from this "American Hero's" collection of cards. It features George Romero. I carry it around with in my purse . What can I say, he also gave me Night of the Living Dead, and for that I love the man unconditionally.

Posted by: ashes at September 9, 2009 11:16 AM

To be fair, this is not a trailer. It is a VERY unfinished show reel. A slate pops up at the end that says: "In Production" tells you that.

I really liked LAND and thought that there were some interesting moments in DIARY so I'm going to give Romero the benefit of the doubt.

Let's wait until we see the finished product before jumping on the guy.

Posted by: ShinyKatesShineRag at September 9, 2009 3:57 PM

"Land of the Dead and Diary of the Dead — are two of the worst zombie movies in recent memory."

So what was better?

Shaun of the Dead? Of Course.

I'm not even going to go into remakes OR 28 Days Later.

Land of the Dead and Diary of the Dead are perfectly good movies. In there own way.

I would just like to know what else has been a good zombie film.

Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Posted by: captainsarcasmo at September 14, 2009 1:16 AM

So you are panning the movie based on a pre-production trailer...hardly seems fair.

I enjoyed Land of the Dead and thought Diary of the Dead was an interesting, though somewhat less than classic entry into the series.

I still immensely enjoy Romero's "Dead' films and look forward to seeing this one.

Posted by: Kevin at September 20, 2009 1:31 AM

Land was bad. I liked Diary. Modern Zombie movies are generally MTV filmed crap with no social redemptive value and pointless gore that are not scary in any way. Shaun and Zombieland will be drek. Fun probably, but of no cinematic value at all.

Posted by: Phil at September 21, 2009 2:10 PM

There is a lot of criticism for a 1:14 clip. George Romero is about the only directer making zombie movies that reflect the flesh eating zombie genre he created.

The newest spat of zombie movies with running zombies and by adding the comedy aspects such as with Zombieland barely deserve consideration as a zombie movie. They are like movies based on a true story where someone sails away in a ship and from there a fantastic story is invented around a simple fact.

Zombieland only resembles a zombie movie because it contains reanimated corpses. 28 Days Later was a good movie but it did not involve zombies rather people affected with a virus who did not die before they became ravenous.

I could go on.

Posted by: maxxdeth at September 22, 2009 6:40 PM

Everyone is forgetting about the fact that zombie movies inherently portray zombies as such and not such as. A genre is only as good as the movie it stifles and stiffling, zombies are. Therefore I'm anxious to see if "Survival" will exist in; or merely near the genre that Romero created that will ultimately judge all others. In other words, zombies eat people... right?

Posted by: RobinWilliams at October 1, 2009 11:44 PM

It does go without saying, that "zombie people" like most of us will go see anything Romero cranks out for grocery money, because, well, it's Romero...and others won't give a shit. That being said, is there anything wrong with a one trick pony? Sure, not the trick, but how it's executed, and maybe when the man stops putting any sort of care into the way his films are made (crummy acting), it's time to hang up the hat.
??

Posted by: Aaron L. at October 2, 2009 12:14 AM

The last two Romero films do not even come close in any way to the original trilogy. What makes some of you think this will be much better? I am a fan of of George A. Romero but i am not a "fanboy". Just because his name is on it doesn't mean its the greatest thing since sliced bread. Thats the problem anymore to many "fanboys" there like lemmings....

Posted by: deaths_shadow at November 5, 2009 1:57 AM

"Land of the dead" was just plain weak compared to the remake of "dawn of the dead". The pace was too slow, and too few hungry killer zombies - 6 billion people on earth, mostly dead, and we see just a handful of the same ones? The social/political plot line was boring, too much time spent on the class distinctions not enough on the essence of zombie operas - the struggle for personal and "wolf pack" survival against overwhelming odds. What happened to chewing up zombie guts with mini-guns, flamethrowers, and cannons shooting steel frisbees? The final insults were the pseudo-hero not drilling "smarter zombie's" head into a bloody stump and happy face survivors driving off into hopeful future celebrating with fireworks - total crap!
Survival of the dead better be twice the movie "land of the dead" could have been or Romero is done. In the end there is no possibility of hope only the resignation that you MAY have another day, and probably not. No one gets out of here alive in any case - fantasy or reality.

Posted by: Hammer at December 25, 2009 8:20 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time