web
counter
 

Camel is Better than Camel Toe, I Suppose

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (54)



sexandthecity2122209.jpg

Dear God, mother of Lord. I’d kind of hoped that someone on the Sex and the City cast might die of old age (or get run over by a bus) before they managed to make the new movie. No such luck. It’s here. And parts of it take place in the desert. With camels. Jesus on a Cracker Suck My Toe it looks awful. Not that this teaser trailer reveals much, but it reveals enough for us to know how very awful it will likely be.

Also, “Carrie On”? Really?

I would rather give head to a monkey. Will someone please Steel Magnolias this franchise into the ground already? The fuck is there left to do with these characters, anyway, besides kill them and turn their skin into coats. Sex and the City 3: PETA’s Revenge!

(Source: Cinematical)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Furry Vengeance Trailer | Inception International Teaser Trailer









Comments

...aaaaaaaaaaand then they get stranded and have to gut Samantha and crawl inside to keep warm. After applying body condoms to avoid getting Tauntaun herpes.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at December 23, 2009 11:09 AM

I honestly can't wait to see the clothing in this movie. The shoes alone! Pajiba be damned, Sex and the City is about more than plot. It's one long fabulous fashion show.

Posted by: becks at December 23, 2009 11:11 AM

I expected a most of that, but the model stomp in the desert was just too much. Pass.

Posted by: Jess-tastic! at December 23, 2009 11:11 AM

Sex And The City 2: Sandy Vaginas.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at December 23, 2009 11:13 AM

As a fan of Sex and the City (I know, I'm sorry!), I actually liked the first movie. But, this story and these characters are so tired. It just doesn't work anymore. I predict this movie will go on the way Bridget Jones 2 did. A complete embarrassment. And Kim Cattrell...please wear sleeves. Thank you.

Posted by: griffimx at December 23, 2009 11:14 AM

Bite your tongue! Kim Cattrall looks great.

Posted by: becks at December 23, 2009 11:18 AM

Is this what feminism was all about? The culmination of it was Twilight and Sex in the City? Wow. At this rate we might jeopardise women's right to vote all over again. Who the hell comes up with these ideas and who pays to watch them???

I bet the suffragettes are turning in their grave.

Posted by: angrywoman at December 23, 2009 11:19 AM

Trailers for The Karate Kid remake, Furry Vengeance and now Sex and the City 2?
A banner day for the old 'Jiba. And by "banner", I mean "alcoholism-inducing".

Posted by: branded at December 23, 2009 11:22 AM

At least there was the vampire Bad Days trailer to make up for it.

Posted by: barf at December 23, 2009 11:24 AM

Video unavailable.

Thank God. Thank you, internet, for saving me from myself.

Posted by: Skewicide Blonde at December 23, 2009 11:27 AM

I respectfully submit that Family Guy has said all that needs to be said on the subject:

"So, this show's about 3 hookers and their mom?"

Posted by: Jacktrade at December 23, 2009 11:29 AM

Already there, branded, and I don't drink! But today's onslaught of 80's nostalgia, then green zone propaganda, and now Carrie's aching nookie has had me groping myself inappropriately and winking at my coworkers all morning!

The guys are trying to ignore me, but I'm persistent.

Posted by: malikvlc at December 23, 2009 11:33 AM

There is something wrong with me. I cannot stop watching this show and the movie. AND I don't even like the characters. I hate Samantha (and Kim Cattrall has always been the fug--even way back in the day with "Porky's" and "Mannequin"), I want to punch Charlotte in her simpering mouth, Miranda is too cockblocking cynical to live, and Carrie? Is all three of them wrapped in tiny pretty clothes. You can put poo in a box and tie it with a pretty bow but it's still gift-wrapped shit.

See that? I hate them but I can't stop watching. They are crack, they are meth, they are straining the cigs out of the beer bottle with your teeth so you can get drunk again and I. Can't. Stop.

Help me.

Posted by: Shonda at December 23, 2009 11:39 AM

Are we bringing turbans back? Because I'm only ok with that if they go along with giant shoulder pads and formal caftans.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 23, 2009 11:42 AM

Shonda, you are 20% of what is wrong with American society. The other 80% are those who don't even realise they're watching a turd.

But seriously, the more you watch it the more they'll come up with this stuff. Stop already!

Posted by: pitchfork at December 23, 2009 11:48 AM

I want to punch everything. Indiscriminately. Just random punching until my hands are nothing but shards of bone and scraps of meat wrapped in bloody shreds of skin.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at December 23, 2009 11:51 AM

I'll try, pitchfork, I'll try. I won't pay to see the movie but I can't guarantee I won't watch it on cable, late at night, when no one is around. "It's just a little bit. I can quit anytime I want."

Posted by: Shonda at December 23, 2009 11:55 AM

Oh lord, I think everyone's a little dramatic. Sex and the City was a pretty good show. I didn't care for the movie and this one looks bad but the show was decent. It was funny at times and genuinely touching sometimes too. I don't think these women are reversing feminism or that they were the worst garbage on television. I feel like some people who post here think that if a show is not their cup of tea then no one with half a brain could possibly enjoy it. Get over yourself.

Posted by: becks at December 23, 2009 11:56 AM

Oh, this is going to be AWESOME.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 23, 2009 12:00 PM

Has anyone done a joke about Brendan Frasier fighting Champagne swilling, fashion-oriented mummys in the desert? No?

Good! Then I'm not to late. The spirits have done it all in one night.

Posted by: fitzwilly at December 23, 2009 12:21 PM

In the next scene a group of mounted tribal warriors whisk down on our hapless ladies and toss burkahs over their 1/2 naked asses. Tied to the backs of camels they are transported across the desert to be sold as sex slaves on the black market. Samantha considers it an upward move career wise.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at December 23, 2009 12:33 PM

becks, I'm in the same boat you are - I have no interest in the story and don't think they should have made another movie but I want to see more pretty clothes. And shiny things.

Posted by: Jen at December 23, 2009 12:56 PM

I've been to the desert on a horse with no name....

Posted by: sansho1 at December 23, 2009 1:05 PM

I enjoy watching Sex & the City. I've seen it several times and will still watch the reruns.

However I think they should have left it at the frist movie. Honestly peeps leave on a high note.

If I find myself liking this new one, I'll eat my words.

Posted by: Jean at December 23, 2009 1:12 PM

I will go see this movie in the hopes that finally, one out of four of these women will wind up with a man who's actually attractive. I guess my best hope is Samantha? Who is 50+ and a bitch.

As I'm approaching 40 and am also a bitch, I watch this movie and imagine myself dressed fabulously in designer clothes, shod in gorgeous shoes, banging a man half my age and model/diva stomping my way through the desert.

This is why women still go to see these movies. It's the sickest, worst sort of escapism, but we can't help ourselves. Now back to my regular life of Payless loafers and ramen noodles. I bid you good day.

Posted by: malechai at December 23, 2009 1:46 PM

Hah!

Old SJP insult: Horseface

New SJP insult: Camelface

One hump or two?

*egggghh, I just creeped myself out*

BTW, I was at the grocery store today and among the many attractive faces on the mags and tabs in the check-out rack was one mag with SJP's face on it. I did America a favor and turned it around so my fellow shoppers could gaze at Ellen Degeneres instead.

You're welcome.

Posted by: , at December 23, 2009 1:58 PM

My wife made me to sit through the first Sex and The City movie as punishment for pissing her off. (I swear I had no idea that stash of M&M's were for PMS emergencies only) But if I have to sit through another one will that qualify as spousal abuse, mental cruelty, or just cinematic S&M foreplay?

When I said, "Thank you sir, may I have another?" I didn't mean it.

Posted by: bleujayone at December 23, 2009 2:00 PM

And what does that mean, "The following preview has been approved for approprite audiences"?

Posted by: , at December 23, 2009 2:01 PM

At this rate we might jeopardise women's right to vote all over again.

Yes, angrywoman. We might, because it was always completely right to argue that silly, frivolous and sentimental women were not persons under the law. It was perfectly fine to say that anyone wearing a skirt, especially those that cared about that skirt, proved their inequality and stupidity. It is enshrined in the law of developed countries all over the world that the right to vote is inextricably linked to utter seriousness, leg hair, and khakis.

Some would tell me that one of the goals of feminism is to show that women can act in feminine ways while remaining intelligent, contributing members of society. To those people I say: Get me a drink, wench. Let's go watch Law Abiding Citizen. No giggling.

/sarcasm

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at December 23, 2009 3:12 PM

Oh, blah. Aren't they done with this yet?

I was a fan of the series, until it got ridiculous. The first film was silly fluff but this too much. The model walk in the fucking desert just made me laugh.

The characters are two dimensional (Shonda hit the nail on the head w/Charlotte & Miranda) and if I see another fucking fashion show disguised as a plot, I'll be reduced to tears.

I'll catch this on cable in 6-8 months.

Posted by: Brie at December 23, 2009 3:33 PM

I love you JK!

Posted by: becks at December 23, 2009 3:37 PM

I love you JK!

Hee! Me too. Also you, becks.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 23, 2009 3:39 PM

Aw, I love you guys too! But let's save some love for angrywoman. She's so... angry.

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at December 23, 2009 3:43 PM

I actually like the show. It was hilarious at times and interesting enough to keep me tuned in. But I thought the last movie was terrible (schmaltzy without being funny, and too sentimental and annoying) and this movie looks worse. It was better in show-sized increments.

Posted by: MyySharona (formerly Sharon) at December 23, 2009 4:22 PM

Oh, fuck off. Fuck OFF.

Yes, it is lame, in the way that those shitty MALE movies are fucking lame. But you know what? They make FORTY of those fucking male movies for every ONE of these fucking female movies, so you know, I'm just really not in the mood to hear any goddamned misogynistic bullshit about it. Really.

And I am REALLY not in the mood to hear ANY fucking bullshit about Sarah Jessica Parker's looks. The fact that she DOESN'T look like EVERY OTHER MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMNED COOKIECUTTER BARBIEDOLL MOVIE STAR SINCE GODDAMNED BRIGITTE FUCKING BARDOT is suddenly SUCH an insult to you cocksuckers, isn't it? How DARE they force you to look at someone whose face isn't oval perfection and whose nose hasn't been shaved down to the standard Hollywood PERK?

Christ on a motherfucking crutch. Every time someone comes along and attains any sort of prominence in Hollywood without fitting into the stereotypical female beauty mold, the barrage of insults is INEVITABLE AS RAIN IN MOTHERFUCKING SEATTLE. Because, hey, how you gonna keep 'em down in their place if they're not feeling insecure as all goddamned get out? What the fuck would happen in women in Hollywood didn't rush to the fucking plastic surgeon's office the minute they saw the first signs of falling out of the 18-26 year-old Barbie Doll range accepted by all you armchair critics -- and, of course, the parade of assholes in suits and executive suites with MBAs masquerading as people qualified to make creative decisions...

Fuck this shit.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 23, 2009 4:30 PM

... IF women in Hollywood didn't rush...

goddamned typo ruining a perfectly good rant...

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 23, 2009 4:34 PM

Assuming this isn't sarcasm, what "barrage of insults" about SJP's looks are going on here, Maryscott? Seems that most people are annoyed because the movie looks like crap. Calm down.

Posted by: Brie at December 23, 2009 4:39 PM

...clothes orgasm...

I mean, I wouldn't pay $10 for a clothes orgasm, but I would certainly lay aside two hours for one.

(Maryscott, I kinda want you right now.)

Posted by: Ling at December 23, 2009 4:59 PM

Awww, thanks AvB! I've gotta say, I love everyone on this site. In particular the women of Pajiba. Even angrywoman. I love that all these ladies don't mind speaking their minds because that is pretty refreshing even if I don't agree.

And I'm sorry Brie but I really hope Maryscott never calms down because her rage is always amusing. Rage on Ms. O'Connor.

Posted by: becks at December 23, 2009 5:03 PM

what "barrage of insults" about SJP's looks are going on here, Maryscott?

"I bet Maryscott wrote this"

Patton Oswalt addressed the issue of male movies and "Sex and the City".

Anway, just don't tell me that the above picture is an officially released still. I mean, come on, be with me here...whether you think she always looks bad or not...that is one ugly photo.

And she likes the smell of dirty diapers. Someone defend that.

Posted by: Jay at December 23, 2009 5:28 PM

I think she's always deathly serious, Brie.

Posted by: Jay at December 23, 2009 5:43 PM

DSHFBSALIGBWLIUVfuckBRSAILVBRSAILVBSALGBSDAKJB VKJVHSVBLFVBLFBLADSHBfuckSKLAGVBOIWEHROHREGFKLRBSVK;LJRGFKHDSAFOIOIWEOVPIBNOJVLDKAJBFVAODBVLJADfuck.

Yeah...let's just say I didn't read the little article. I didn't watch the fucking trailer. I haven't read any of the comments.

Why? Because I hate anything to do with Sarah HorseFace Parker or Sex and the City. Why? Because my brain starts too ooze out of my ears and I want to gouge out my own eyes. With sporks.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at December 23, 2009 5:55 PM

Fuck...I read some of them.

Maryscott O'Connor...I'm not saying that all women in Hollywood have to fit a mold when I call Parker "HorseFace." However, if you want to be "good" in Hollywood, it helps if you have looks but no acting ability (Meagan Fox). When you have no acting ability and no looks (Parker) that's just asking for a good kick around. Of course then again you have looks and acting ability (Charlize Theron)...which is really the goal.

For example. Steve Buscemi is likely one of the ugliest fuckers on the planet...but he can act.

What has Parker done?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at December 23, 2009 6:01 PM

Omg this looks ridiculous. Hahahahahahahahaaaaa.

Posted by: grace b at December 23, 2009 6:26 PM

What has Parker done?

Mathew Broderick.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at December 23, 2009 10:49 PM

MaryScott,

Your rage gives me sustenance, but tell me again why this hag

www.derober.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/sarah_jessica_parker_a.jpg

cm1.theinsider.com/media/0/34/25/parker_2_L.0.0.0x0.411x600.jpeg

is a movie star and makeup model?

Posted by: , at December 24, 2009 1:35 AM

I like Sarah Jessica Parker. I think she seems sweet. She's in really great shape too, even if she doesn't have a great face. I think she does the most with what she has. I don't think she's a bad actress either. I always found her entertaining on Sex and the City.

People also seem to be forgetting the masterpiece that was 'Hocus Pocus'.

Posted by: becks at December 24, 2009 8:05 AM

LindsEy, she also did Robert Downey Jr. for like 5 years and JFK Jr. for a little while.

Posted by: becks at December 24, 2009 9:17 AM

Yay Maryscott!

I'm not a fan of SJP's, but I too get tired of the "horseface" crap. If she's that evil, surely people can slag her for something other than her looks. Like that squeak thing she does with her voice that's supposed to be "adorable" rather than an insult to women everywhere.

Hm. It appears I am torn on this issue.

Posted by: malechai at December 24, 2009 11:49 AM

A gigantic YES to Maryscott's entire post. I don't see Heigl and her perfect face getting a lot of respect here either. Damned if you do...

What has Parker done?

Crafted a damn fine career for herself and made a boatload of money. And a decent actress.

She's a blue eyed blonde with a killer body and a very slightly unusual face with every bit of enhancement and grooming a boatload of money can provide. That most of you idiots that insult her would give your left arm to spend a moment in the company of if you could tear yourself away from your Avatar happy meal.

Posted by: Abby at December 24, 2009 1:53 PM

Gary Busey also looks like a horse.

Posted by: sansho1 at December 25, 2009 11:41 AM

These women can ride camels all they want, for all I care. They can give each other abortions on live TV, shoplift from Sears, do Zumba in the middle of a McDonalds, buddy up to Glenn Beck, even decry homosexuality as a sin.

I could give a shit less about any of that.

I will see this movie for the same two reasons I saw the last one and watched every last episode of SATC when it aired:

1. The fashion is fucking amazeballs; and,
2. I wanna fuck Big. Correction: I want Big to fuck me. In Prada.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at December 26, 2009 12:39 AM

...is a movie star and makeup model?

She didn't cast herself on behalf of these companies, so I'm not sure what kind of answer is appropriate here besides a sarcastic or mean one.

SJP may be facially unattractive (I'm used to her and like her unceasing body and lovely personality a lot) but she has carved a niche for herself and represents something very positive: a smart, capable comedic actress who constantly humbles herself onscreen and off. I respect her and it has nothing to do with whether people want to bed her or not.

Posted by: caroline at December 26, 2009 12:47 AM

Pure garbage. Read a book, girls.

Posted by: Angelique at June 5, 2010 6:24 PM