web
counter
 

I've Got The Need, The Need For Speed; Specifically 299,792 Kilometers per Second: The C Trailer

By Rob Payne | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (18)



pajibaCtrailer.jpg

If you watch as many science documentaries as I do — mostly about dinosaurs and space — then you probably know that despite what most science fiction tells us (even “hard sci-fi,” Roman), it’s all a bit fantastical in terms of galactic (and especially universal) expoloration, colonization, and domination. Mainly, the practically dragon-sized bullsh comes in the form of Faster Than Light Travel, like the warp drives in “Star Trek” or the hyper drive in Star Wars, that posit humanity will eventually be able to literally travel faster than the speed of light — or faster than 299,792,458 m/s (that’s 186,282 miles per second for us backassward Americans, thanks Wikipedia!), thus allowing our species to move beyond our solar system and stave off eventual, inevtiable extinction. Like time travel, allowing for the possibility makes for some excellent drama, and while there are theories and formulas that seem to indicate FTL probability, the actual possibility is much closer to zero. But that’s less fun to think about.

Or is it? Take the planet that NASA’s Kepler space station recently discovered, Kepler-22b, which is merely 600 light-years away from Earth. Our galaxy is over 200,000 light-years across, so 600 light-years is a relatively short distance as far as our The Milky Way is concerned. But that means even if we do find evidence of water or life there, and the world’s best scientists create some sort of lightspeed (or, C) technology by the end of next year, it would still take 600 years for us to travel there. We could send some sort of radio signal to there, but even at C, it would take 1200 years before we ever got a response — and that’s assuming the inhabitants of Kepler-22b will be able to even send a message of their own. Discovering a possible Earth-like, habitable extra-solar planet is indeed exciting, but it’s rather moot for now, and kind of deflates the idea of a sci-fi story utilizing non-FTL technology. After all, that would be one helluva long movie.

But two independent filmmakers are going to attempt just that in C, a short film about one spaceship’s flight officer trying a last ditch attempt to save humanity by taking a one-way voyage to the stars in the hopes of finding new home for her species. As she says in the below trailer, the length of the trip won’t matter as long as she and her shipmates are successful in the end. Naturally, not every member of her crew is looking forward to certain death, so complications undoubtedly arise. But writers/directors Derek Van Gorder and Otto Stockmeier are doubling down on their movie’s premise by mimicking the stripped-down tech approach by only using in-camera, practical effects, and no fancy schmancy digitial trickery. No greenscreen, and no CGI. If you thought Duncan Jones’ excellent Moon (my favorite movie of 2010) harkened back to sci-fi’s filmic golden age of the 1970s, then you haven’t seen anything, yet, space cowboy (or cowgirl).

Here’s the fairly bare bones, but incredibly effective trailer:

c (299,792 kilometers per second) from Derek Van Gorder on Vimeo.

Looks pretty good, huh? There’s only one problem: C still hasn’t been made. In fact, this trailer was produced entirely for Van Gorder’s and Stockmeier’s Kickstarter campaign, which reached its $18,628 goal as of last night (likely helped by [hat tip] Topless Robot’s original post). That’s not a lot of money, and I’ve seen artists asking for twice as much to produce their own graphic novels, which, I can promise you, doesn’t cost nearly that much money to produce. But with a lot of effort and a little help from friends willing to work mostly pro bono, it definitely seems feasible. Though the filmmakers aren’t asking for more money, if you’re as interested in seeing the final project as I am, you might still be able to donate whatever you think is fair until the deadline 16 days from now.

We could consider it penance for bankrolling all those Transformers movies so many of us seem not to get enough of. Though, I’ve only seen two, so my guilt is merely 2/3 some of yours. If the trailer above isn’t good enough for you, the Kickstarter page has a fun and (and I believe) faux documentary trailer for a Carl Sagan-ish mini-series called “Beyond The Infinite” that looks like it might go into the science behind the space travel in C. And the title of that, I’m fairly certain, is a reference to Douglas Trumbull’s making-of doc about Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. This is the poster mock-up for the doc:

pajibaCtrailerposter.jpg

I’m already a fan.


Rob Payne also writes the indie comic The Unstoppable Force, tweets on the Twitter @RobOfWar, and his ware can be purchased here. He’s going to consider his Kickstarter pledge the charitable gift his excessively liberal aunt asked each member of his family to donate in lieu of buying each other Christmas presents.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Sadly Sad Lindsay Lohan | The Effect of Simultaneous Orgasms On Your Quality of Life









Comments

ooo i like it.

Posted by: gp at December 9, 2011 10:37 AM

The trailer reminds me of Zero Tau by Poul Anderson. But that's not a bad thing and I'll be checking this out as soon as I can.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau_Zero

Posted by: Yastobaal at December 9, 2011 11:14 AM

Caught it on Netflix a couple of years from now.

Posted by: The Wanderer at December 9, 2011 11:16 AM

I really hope that it gets made.

Posted by: admin at December 9, 2011 11:19 AM

Hmmm, I don't know if anyone's made a movie on time dilation yet.

Posted by: Jay at December 9, 2011 11:43 AM

So? This is about a bunch of people standing around, waiting to die, so their great, great, great, great, great, great, great, . . . great grandchildren can crashland on a planet that might support life? Oh, wait, they have to have children. That means theirs lots of sex on the spaceship, right? Although the spaceship could run out of room for people over 600 years. Or are the people in sleep mode (oh, what's that called?) hibernation? OH, this is the C ark? I get it.

Posted by: BWeaves at December 9, 2011 11:48 AM

Wouldn't it be easier to just preserve the resources we've got now, rather than using them up and then saying, "Oh, fuck, now we gotta find another planet!"

Yeah, I know ...

Posted by: Slash at December 9, 2011 12:43 PM

Thanks, Yastobaal, that book sounds worth checking out. You guys are always giving me book recommendations, and I'm spending way too much on them and have absolutely no time to read them. But I'll probably end up ordering the Anderson book from Amazon by the end of the weekend. Huzzah?

@Slash: Well, the point of colonzing other planets/moons is simply because no matter how well we safeguard our resources here, over time we simply won't be able to remain on Earth. Climate change, tectonic plate shifts, asteroid colisions, the Milky Way merging with the Andromeda galaxy, and the eventual red dawrfing of our Sun are all reasons why Earth isn't a permanent spot for any species. Humans are just the only ones capable of doing anything about it. Right now, anyway. Our eventual ape and/or ant overlords might have more luck.

Posted by: RobP at December 9, 2011 1:05 PM

"earth search" a novel by ken follet has a lot of time dilation effect in it can't think of any movies

Posted by: Andydean at December 9, 2011 1:18 PM

"earth search" a novel by ken follet has a lot of time dilation effect in it can't think of any movies

Posted by: Andydean at December 9, 2011 1:19 PM

one key point, it's 600 years in terms of the people on earth, not the people in the ship. This is Einstein's theory of relativity. In other words since they are traveling so fast time actually slows down in their perspective. Thus if they get close enough to the speed of light the trip could take as little as a day for them (of course this will mean VERY close), however it's very possible they arrive within only a few years in their perspective if they have a "c drive"

Posted by: chris at December 9, 2011 5:25 PM

That is an excellent point, chris, but I'm terrible at math dealing with astronomical numbers. So I tried to keep it from an Earthling's point of view. But, yeah, time dilation would certainly make the trip shorter for those onboard.

Thanks for commenting!

Posted by: RobP at December 9, 2011 5:39 PM

I always thought the Star Trek's warp drive based on folding space rather than superlight speed?

Posted by: FabMax at December 9, 2011 7:26 PM

Planets are for wimps.

Artificial colonies can support trillions of people.

Looking for habitable planets is a sign we have not emerged from childhood yet.

Posted by: eman at December 9, 2011 10:39 PM

Hey Rob, just wanted to let you know this is an awesome article, you really read between the lines and picked up on everything we're going for with this film! Thanks!!

- Derek Van Gorder
www.c-themovie.com

Posted by: Derek VG at December 11, 2011 3:48 PM

The trailer reminds me of Zero Tau by Poul Anderson. But that's not a bad thing and I'll be checking this out as soon as I can.
if you interested, please check this exciting club for fun goo.gl/R6pfL
Thank you very much.

Posted by: kengao46 at December 11, 2011 9:42 PM

Andydean, it's actually James Follett who wrote Earthsearch. There's a brilliant radio serial version of it, quite dated but still really scary. The bit where they find out about how time means something different to them than it does for Earth's inhabitants - SO good !

Posted by: Ponytail at December 12, 2011 4:47 AM

Shiptime of 1 year on a ship travelling at 0.9c is about 2 years earthtime. However travelling at 0.999c one year shiptime will be over 22 years earthtime. Get the ship accelerated to 0.999999c and one year shiptime will be over 700 years in earthtime. Meaning that in theory you could reach Keppler-22b (600 lightyears away) in a year, however acceleration and deceleration would mean the length of the trip would be a lot longer. At a constant 1G acceleration it would take over 12 years to reach Keppler-22b.

Posted by: Acolyte at December 21, 2011 2:55 AM