web
counter
 

You Wanna F**k? Take Me to F**ktown!

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (149)



0_61_052908_jameson.jpg

A couple of not-really porn related items to report this morning. First off, Christina Ricci has signed on to Born to be a Star, a “porn-tinged” comedy (as THR) reports, written by Adam (fucking) Sandler and Jack Giarraputo. The movie is about a nerdy Iowan who discovers that his parents were porn stars back in the 1970s, so he decides to move to Hollywood and join the profession. Ricci will play the nerdy kid’s innocent girlfriend. And although a lot of the Happy Madison regulars are part of the production (Allen Covert and Barry Bernandi are producing, and Tom Brady (The Hot Chicks, Animal) is directing, it’s not actually a Happy Madison production. It’ll be released by Sony, but don’t get your hopes up — it’s sure to suck as much as the rest of the Happy Madison productions.

In related news, here’s the teaser trailer for How to Make Love to a Woman, which features Jenna Jameson and Krysten Ritter. It looks pretty goddamn moronic:










Cherrybomb Trailer | Sugar Review













Comments

There better a lot of Ricci titage footage on this.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 10:37 AM

What is with the porn is funny thing? Am I the only one who looks at the actors and sees damaged children and an almost certain legacy of child abuse? OR am I so pre-Camille Paglia "My Sexuality Is My Own to Exploit So Fuck You!" feminist that I should catch up to the 21st century. The latter? I thought so.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 10:37 AM

Porn is funniest when you fast forward it.

Posted by: Julie at April 6, 2009 10:45 AM

My Name is: no, you're not alone. We're the old fuddy-duddies who recognize that the sex industry is bad for about 99% of those in it and that stripping isn't necessarily always "empowering" for women. It's not hip now, so keep it low.

Posted by: samantha t at April 6, 2009 10:45 AM

And then BarbadoSlim totally justifies my feelings! Well done sir.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 10:52 AM

That's Jenna Jameson. I thought that was a picture of Mickey Rourke in drag. My god she's in bad shape.

Posted by: George at April 6, 2009 10:53 AM

Samantha T. ...

I'll go put some ironic chick mudflaps on my Camry.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 10:54 AM

The biggest lie that has ever been told to women is that porn is not empowering, it is very empowering. Pussy is the greatest commodity the world has ever known, pussy must be embraced as a tool for change. Ladies of pajiba, the majority of the men here don’t know about women. I know women, I love women, I know what a women will and won’t do, I crave women. You will not find a bigger advocate for women than Pookie.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 11:03 AM

I read that as "Porn to be a Star."

Posted by: BWeaves at April 6, 2009 11:03 AM

Pookie: Spoken like a true man. And you're still wrong.

Posted by: BWeaves at April 6, 2009 11:04 AM

BWeaves, are you saying that porn is not empowering?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 11:07 AM

Julie...remind me to show you my 'fast forward porno' impression and my 'midget fuck' impression when next we meet. And bring a diaper or something. Yer gonna pee.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 6, 2009 11:12 AM

'midget fuck' impression

Hee hee! I will definitely be requiring a viewing.

Posted by: Julie at April 6, 2009 11:17 AM

For a minute there I thought you were gonna quote J. Lo's "Pussy" monologue (as seen in Gigli), Pookie.

Posted by: Sofía at April 6, 2009 11:17 AM

We're the old fuddy-duddies

There's a few youngish fuddy-duddies who share your sentiments around here, too. Well, at least one.

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 6, 2009 11:20 AM

As long as the attitude still stands that a woman is a slut if she sleeps with more than X number of people and that she will always be considered "less than" if she sells her body for money, then porn is not empowering.
If you're confused on that fact, all you need to do is take a look at the women who have been through the porn wringer and judge whether they used the porn or the porn used them.

Posted by: missh at April 6, 2009 11:20 AM

Thanks Sofia, now I have a reason to see Gigli. But to tell you the truth, I'm already well versed in the fundamentals of the "Pussy."

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 11:27 AM

Man... I thought you were gonna give out directions to a magical place called Fucktown. I had a picnic basket full of flippity-floppity dildomabobblers and a Super-Soaker filled with looby-doob. I bought a Slip-N-Slide, fer chrissakes...

Posted by: Skitz at April 6, 2009 11:31 AM

Oh Pookie. Seriously dude!

Because what every little girl needs to learn is how access to her "power"? I get to choose who violates me for money, but just until I get too old and they have no use for me. Lucky me!

Here is what most men need to understand about women and empowerment and sex if they don't already:

Long version -

Women are aware of their power in terms of sex, i.e. anytime they want sex they could theoretically get it; however, woman are also very aware that men are almost always physically stronger than them and empowered in an entirely different way. It balances out that whole My Body Is My Power Thing.

Short version - The Accused

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 11:35 AM

...and then you catch the Herp-A-Derp.

Posted by: Snath at April 6, 2009 11:35 AM

I generally like porn (Fuck you and you're goddamn politics) but if Jenna Jameson's face is going to be the result I may have to re-examine my position.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 6, 2009 11:36 AM

THAT VIDEO DIDN'T TEACH ME ANYTHING! Post more trailers for this. A ... friend needs some tips.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 6, 2009 11:49 AM

Listen My Name is for my Friends, get off the internet and call the police and tell them that the nearest strip club closest to you that women are being held hostage and are forced to dance naked for men.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 11:57 AM

I came for the porn but I'm staying for the enlightening conversation.

Also...PissBoy? No midgets. I beg of you. That intrigues me and scares me at the same time.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 6, 2009 12:00 PM

Porn isn't empowering for women. There are a select few who have managed to parlay it into wealth and fame, like Jenna, but they too have a history of sexual abuse. It's extremely common.

That said, as an entertainment medium, it's often goddamn hilarious.

Posted by: MG at April 6, 2009 12:01 PM

Porn is fine and entertaining and empowering and not hurting anyone... until your daughter, mother or sister does it. Any man that says he's okay with seeing his mother get it up the ass while choking down cock is full of shit.

Posted by: courtney at April 6, 2009 12:07 PM

Pookie. you have left me no choice but to quote
the anti-Pajiba movie Crash:

Look at me. You embarrass me. You embarrass yourself.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 12:14 PM

Of course no one wants to see their daughter, mother or sister doing it. But unfortunately someone's daughter, mother and sister are doing it.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 12:17 PM

"seeing his mother get it up the ass while choking down cock"

And the Most Disturbing Mental Image of the Year award goes to...

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 6, 2009 12:17 PM

I watch porn for the dialogue.

Posted by: Kolby at April 6, 2009 12:18 PM

I enjoy the rich tapestry of plot, foreshadowing & boob shots at unique angles.

Posted by: Skitz at April 6, 2009 12:26 PM

I watch porn for the dialogue.

Kolby, I heart you so much right now, I'd like to improve some dialogue with you.

The trailer reminded me how hot Ian Somerhalder is. And that his Lost syndication checks must not be as big as I thought.

Posted by: Kayanne at April 6, 2009 12:34 PM

I don't necessarily dislike porn, but do you ever notice how seldom any of the pros seems to enjoy what they're doing? They make sex seem so uncomfortable and forced--and the mindless, parrot-like dirty talk! It's hilarious because it's so damn unsexy. Blargh. Give me the amateurs any day.

Many, many jobs are soul-crushing and distasteful--that's why we get paid to do them--so I really don't care if anyone wants to be in the porn/stripper business, but spare me the indignant "empowerment" justification.

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 6, 2009 12:38 PM

Frankly, if you get off on watching family members screw, female empowerment through porn is really the least of your problems.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 6, 2009 12:40 PM

Tracer, define family?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 12:45 PM

Kayanne - it'll be $12.95 for the pizza. Delivery is free...

Bow chicka wow wow

Posted by: Kolby at April 6, 2009 12:51 PM

Family - traceable to you by blood or marriage in some way within 6 generations. Like that time my hot cousin came on to me, and I had to let her down. There's a time and place for everything. And that's West Virginia.

Kolby...please continue.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 6, 2009 12:56 PM

If everyone only knew just how many women in porn were molested as children/young girls, you'd think differently about this whole empowerment bullshit. In fact, you'd see it in a *completely* different light, I promise you that.

And as a woman, I'll tell you what's "empowering" (what's up with that word, anyway?): my education, my knowledge, my capability, my career, my relationships with others, all kinds of things that don't involve what women do in porn. I'm extremely thankful that getting ready to do my job doesn't involve hot wax, an enema, and either shots of whiskey or a hit of meth. Or both.

All this being said, I've seen the stuff, obviously. But I don't for a second tell myself the lie that they're somehow "empowered" by it. Lord have mercy.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 12:59 PM

Darn hitting that post comment button too early!

Does anyone think for a second that any of these women chose making porn videos over a career in marketing or academia or medicine? I mean, it's preferable to being a hooker in the street, I suppose. Safer, I guess, in some ways, but it's just a step up really.

Nothing is empowering when it's what you have to do because your other options are either extremely limited or non-existent.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 1:04 PM

Thanks for nothing SoD, you’ve left me in a pickle with that definition of yours. I didn’t ask you a goddamn thing, I asked Kolby. Kolby, can you give me a more favorable definition of the word family?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 1:10 PM

Woo hoo and a shout out to Snuggiepants the Deathbringer!

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 1:12 PM

Amen. I have watched porn in my day, and there nothing less sexy than that dead look in the actors' eyes. It's fucking depressing. I'd rather read a nice batch of erotica any day.

Posted by: Treena at April 6, 2009 1:12 PM

But...Pookie...I was just trying to help.

Sniff...

Stop pimping out your sister.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 6, 2009 1:15 PM

Actually, Pooks, you asked Tracer. I don't really know how to define family, because I don't think you need to be blood-related to consider a person to be a part of your family. You just have to love that person, and they have to be an important part of your life. They're the folks you depend on.

Posted by: Kolby at April 6, 2009 1:16 PM

Actually, some women have chosen to do just that. Annabelle Chong was a grad student at USC when she did the World's Biggest Gangbang and decided she'd rather get railed for money as a career instead of just a hobby. Shit, MOST people have limited career options and most people live lives of quiet desperation. Working in porn probably isn't a sunny day at the beach, but assuming ALL porn stars are hollowed-out loser junkie victims is just paternalistic and self-righteous.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 6, 2009 1:17 PM

nothing less sexy than that dead look in the actors' eyes

That could be a turn-on to fetishists. Just saying.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 6, 2009 1:17 PM

Snuggie, are you saying that smart successful women don’t like to watch porn?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 1:21 PM

No one wants to see their brothers, fathers or sons in porn either. But I don't think the porn industry if filled with nothing but orphans either. (Although I would believe that many don't have what they would consider a traditional family.)

Porn isn't empowering, it's a business transaction. As a woman, I'll gladly admit I love porn for the entertainment value. It's hilarious, and fun to watch the boys' reactions when you tell them you'd love to watch a little porn with them. I'm not worried about the Jenna Jamesons and Katie Morgans of the world. They make enough money to get out if they want but chose not to because I think they genuinely like their jobs. I do worry about the nameless, faceless internet porn girls who might not have a way out. They are not empowered, they're usually young girls, who are probably not that smart, and have few other options financially.

Posted by: Austin asking for trouble at April 6, 2009 1:22 PM

I mean really SoD, you’re better than that. What’s next, jokes about each other’s mother?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 1:24 PM

Ricci will play the nerdy kid’s innocent girlfriend.

Really? I love CR, but isn't this the role she would have played about five years ago? She's not even 30 yet, but this role sounds more Zooey Deschanel than Christina Ricci.

Re the porn thing:

Why is porn funny? Well, why are inbred hillbillies living in tar paper shacks in Appalachia funny? Their parents put them in a bad situation, they never have a real chance to better themselves, and they live in abject poverty. We still laugh at them if there's a good joke to be had. How does a porn actor get better treatment than those folks, or people going through a horrible divorce, or people in prison? Hell, there are decent movie jokes about the Holocaust and 9/11.

News flash: All humor -- all of it -- is based on some form of pain, even if might be only irritation in some situations. Are jokes about porn always funny? Of course not. Do some attempts at porn humor have the potential to cross the line and denigrate women (or men, too)? Of course they do. Can it be mined for a rich vein of character-based humor? In the right hands, of course it can.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 6, 2009 1:25 PM

I don't think there is anything I can say about this that hasn't been said already. Porn has played a huge role in the commodification of the female body, as well as sex itself. Porn has become mainstream, and, based on what I have seen, has been glamourized to an unhealthy degree. I worked in a sex shop, and some customers had absolutely horrifying attitudes towards sex and women, which they would frequently share with me while rummaging through the DVD section, making disgusting comments about the girls on the cases. I guess what I'm trying to say here, perhaps not very well, is that by bringing porn into the mainstream, we are bringing those unhealthy attitudes along with it.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 1:25 PM

this role sounds more Zooey Deschanel than Christina Ricci.

I guess not. Deschanel is virtually the same age as Ricci.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 6, 2009 1:27 PM

Thank you Austin, finally, a woman that will admit she enjoys watching porn. And I agree with you about the Jamesons and the Morgans. Yes, sadly some young women have unfortunate experiences in the porn industry. And those are the ones we should be vigilant about protecting.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 1:30 PM

Pookie hearts puddin' cup. A sex shop, really? Wait a minute, you're a broad, right?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 1:35 PM

I freely admit that I assume they are broken children because life
has taught me that healthy, well-balanced people don't do things like that.
I don't care if you think that's paternalistic or self-righteous. When I
watch an interview with Jenna Jameson and she says "I was 21 and horny and
figured why not do porn?" and then acknowledges she was gang-raped as a teen
I don't think there is a total disconnect in my conclusions.

I don't know anything about Annabelle Chong so I can't comment on her
actions. Perhaps she is the exception that proves the rule.

You know what's paternalistic and self-righteous, or self-justifying at least? The
assumption that because the people choose to participate, it absolves the
viewer of any responsibilty for thinking of them as human beings. It also
allows a complete denial of the fact that there is more to sex than
just mechanics.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 1:37 PM

Here's the way it goes: not all women who were molested as kids grow up to be in porn. Not at all.

However, it does work in the inverse: a significant percentage of women in porn were molested/sexually abused as either children or teenagers (eg before they could or would give their consent).

This doesn't make their being in porn empowering. It means a lot of things, but not that. Most likely it's the only way they feel they have value--as an orifice, as a means to an end, as a thing. It's the opposite of empowering. Their potential autonomy as a human being was taken from them before they could exercise it. And so they submit to being violated again and again, but figure it's better now because a) they are adults and b) they're being paid for it. And I can't really disagree with that. Thank God they're adults and at least getting paid for it!

But seriously, let's not kid ourselves. With very rare exception, this is something a woman goes into when she feels she doesn't have a lot of other choices. It's not cheeky fun for the woman involved, it's fairly sordid.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 1:40 PM

Pookie "Yes, sadly some young women have unfortunate experiences in the
porn industry."

I think the point some of us are trying to make is that their "unfortunate
experiences" are what lead them to the porn industry.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 1:42 PM

Succinct and fantastic Snuggiepants!

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 1:43 PM

My Name Is for My Friends

Interesting handle, particularly for this site. I doubt anyone expects a real name as a handle, so I'm genuinely curious about the implication.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 6, 2009 1:46 PM

There is nothing wrong with being paternalistic or self-righteous, the problem comes when the self-righteous want to preach their morals and values to someone else. Porn is not illegal, society has said that porn is an acceptable form of entertainment. One can pick and chose any industry to protest for having some form of dehumanization attached to it. One day I hope we become a society that says if you don’t like something, don’t fuck with it, but if I like it, don’t fuck with me for liking it.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 1:52 PM

You're making conclusions based on nothing more than your own biases. You may be right, but you don't know it and you can't prove it. Instead, you've decided, "I don't like porn" which lead to, "I would never do porn" and from that concluded, "Only severely damaged people would do porn." Your choices aren't appropriate for everybody and you're standing on the precipice of a real slippery slope when you start assuming they are.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 6, 2009 1:55 PM

Another thing no one has mentioned yet is exactly how much money these girls are being paid. The bigger name actresses like Jenna Jameson usually have big contracts and I believe she might even own her own production company. Pookie, you're the expert, is that correct?

But, most just get paid for their work per film and don't see any of the royalties for each dvd or download. It's a lot like the early days of professional sports when athletes had to hold down second or third jobs during the off season while the owners raked in the millions. There is nothing empowering about that.

Posted by: Austin asking for trouble at April 6, 2009 1:57 PM

socalledonlycousins - It's a reference to Lawrence of Arabia and I started using it when I learned that Dustin hasn't seen the movie yet he runs what began as a movie site. Paternalistic and self-righteous right down to my nomenclature.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 1:57 PM

No, Pookie, I am not a "broad." I am a woman. And Snuggiepants, you said it better than I could. Women in porn tend to be perceived by the people watching them as sexually liberated and completely lacking any inhibitions. Perhaps that is the case for some, as I am not going to assume that all women in porn are somehow "damaged," but for the most part, I think that porn IS a last resort. The sooner people realize how damaging porn can be, not only for those involved, but for those watching it as well, the sooner our attitudes towards sex and women will change for the better.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 1:58 PM

When I was seventeen, a friend and I traded two Meat-Lovers pizzas for a free porn rental called Let My Puppets Cum. It was good for a laugh until about halfway through when I recognized the owner of the "full-blooded cocker" was a stagehand from season three of The Muppet Show. Sadly, her dreams of making it big had failed and she wound up pleasuring a plush pup with googly eyes...

Sad, really...

Posted by: Skitz at April 6, 2009 1:59 PM

Oh no he didn't! Motherfucka went to the precipice card, and in broad daylight too. Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 2:00 PM

Regarding bad porn:

The mark of a really good porn is what someone up there said, if the girl looks dead eyed, doped up etc...it's more depressing than anything. However, you when you get one of the GREAT ones where she looks like she really is *into* that pounding maaaaaaaaaan *sigh* anyway, that's what separates your Jennas, your Traci Lords, Sekas, Vanessa Del Rios from your average dead eyed meth-skank from the Valley trying to score her next hit.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 2:03 PM

It's a reference to Lawrence of Arabia and I started using it when I learned that Dustin hasn't seen the movie yet he runs what began as a movie site. Paternalistic and self-righteous right down to my nomenclature.

Great. Exactly what we need.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 6, 2009 2:06 PM

BarbadoSlim, the fact that you included Traci Lords in that is kind of disturbing, considering the fact that she was sixteen years old when she started in the industry.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 2:08 PM

Yeah, Nina Hartley's a more solid example, Slim.

What?

Posted by: Jay at April 6, 2009 2:10 PM

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 2:08 PM

I see nothing to be disturbed about, nobody knew, I'm not gonna get all hypocritical and deny it now. The FACT is she was THE porn star of her day, 16 or not.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 2:14 PM

No shout-outs for Samantha G?

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 6, 2009 2:14 PM

"Comedy is when you fall into an open manhole and die. Tragedy is when I cut my finger" - Mel Brooks.

It's all perspective. The worst porn is the type that objectifies and/or degrades one or more of the parties. Some appears to feature both sides enjoying themselves - ok I guess. While there's the lucky few who do porn for a bit then get out, financially better, there's enough who just get used and discarded that I'd consider it more of a harmful thing than a good thing.

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 6, 2009 2:16 PM

Yes Austin, you are correct on both counts. Lately there has been a push by the Jamesons and the Morgans to make and distribute their own product. With the advent of the internet and webcams and other computer related products, the individual has over taken what was once controlled by the conglomerate. So now any female with a computer can attach a webcam and make, produce, and sell porn. And with the money she makes, she can now get counseling to find out why she has a psychological need to make porn.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 2:16 PM

That may be true, BSlim, but I can't help but find it creepy that people still watch the stuff she was in despite the fact that they now know that she was sixteen when she made them.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 2:19 PM

Tracer You'd be wrong. I've seen some softcore stuff I found appealing. In some cases, very softcore. (I've never supported the industry with my money, however.) I don't hate porn, I don't have any strong feelings about it, actually. It exists and like Pookie said, it's not illegal. This is very true! What I am addressing here is the ludicrous notion that women are empowered by being in porn. It's the only thing I've addressed here.

Do you have some reason to assert that most women in porn were not sexually abused before going into that line of work? I'd be curious to hear it.

Pookie Who's fucking with you? I'm disagreeing with your assertion that working in the porn industry is so wonderfully empowering for women. Specifically this:

The biggest lie that has ever been told to women is that porn is not empowering, it is very empowering. Pussy is the greatest commodity the world has ever known, pussy must be embraced as a tool for change. Ladies of pajiba, the majority of the men here don’t know about women. I know women, I love women, I know what a women will and won’t do, I crave women. You will not find a bigger advocate for women than Pookie.

Later you even said that "unfortunately someone's mother, daughter and sister are doing it." If it's so empowering for women, why is it unfortunate if someone's mother, daughter or sister is doing it? It's ok as long as it's not a woman you love, I guess. Because I don't know many men who could watch their daughter up on the pole at all all-nude venue and smile and say "I'm glad she's so empowered and uses her pussy for money!"

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:20 PM

Seka! Vanessa Del Rio! BSlim, do you know how many towels I destroyed in the name of those women?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 2:21 PM

Without pornography, there would be many smooth bass riffs out of work...

Posted by: Skitz at April 6, 2009 2:23 PM

I don't know that anyone here stated that working in porn, whatever else it is, is empowering, so there's kind of a straw man argument going on.

Posted by: Jay at April 6, 2009 2:25 PM

Pookie " One can pick and chose any industry to protest for having some form
of dehumanization attached to it."

I think I can safely say that I am against dehumanization full stop.

"One day I hope we become a society that says if you don’t like something,
don’t fuck with it, but if I like it, don’t fuck with me for liking it."

I believe you are describing a democracy and the fact that we are having
this conversation says it is working.

Tracer - You may be right, but you don't know it and you can't prove it.

I would try to prove it, but I'm at work and it gives my employer agita when I type in search terms like "Child sexual abuse and the porn industry."

Tracer - Instead, you've decided, "I don't like porn" which lead to, "I would
never do porn" and from that concluded, "Only severely damaged
people would do porn."

I don't like rape. I have never been raped.
Only severely damaged people would rape.

I don't like cookies. I have never had cookies.
Only severely damaged people like cookies.

Quite an assumption on your part there.

Tracer "Your choices aren't appropriate for everybody and you're standing on
the precipice of a real slippery slope when you start assuming they are."

I'm not assuming that. I assume we all have different choices based on our life experiences and opportunities good and bad. Porn is not such a great
path. Do you honestly expect to convince anyone that it is?

Also, I don't think I see porn as immoral per se and I don't think the
actors are bad people. The people who run the industry though? I'm
pretty sure they are not so nice.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 2:25 PM

Skitz
HA!

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:25 PM

Jay Pookie, early in the thread:

The biggest lie that has ever been told to women is that porn is not empowering, it is very empowering.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:26 PM

can't help but find it creepy that people still watch the stuff she was in despite the fact that they now know that she was sixteen when she made them.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 2:19 PM

-----------------------------------------------

Just to be *precise* I never said I still watch her stuff. So you'd have to take it up with those who do.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 2:26 PM

Pookie, early in the thread

You know waaaaaay better than that. Anyway, the Pookie thing didn't use the word first so it's even more irrelevant.

Posted by: Jay at April 6, 2009 2:29 PM

socalledonlycousins - I've been here a while. Just the name is new.

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 2:30 PM

I wasn't directing that at you specifically, I was speaking in general terms. I didn't say "you still watch," I said "people still watch." Just to clarify.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 2:30 PM

Consider it clarified :)

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 2:31 PM

On a side note - Does anyone else think Dustin threw us a bone (pun intended)
with his original post? Thanks for lining up the hijacking Dustin!

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 2:31 PM

Jay You're right, samantha said it in quotation marks. Is Pookie a thing? I was never completely clear on that. Mind you, I've suspected.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:32 PM

Dammit, I hit the button again too soon.

Jay you didn't ask about who said it first, you just said no one was arguing that it was empowering for women. The Pookie thing is/was.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:33 PM

This might be the exact opposite of keeping it above the waist, though it is, strangely enough, pretty on-topic.

Posted by: Snath at April 6, 2009 2:35 PM

Don't anyone ever say "The Pookie thing" again. I'm picturing a salivating gelatinous monster with a copy of Juicy Cheerleaders in one claw and a keyboard in the other.

Posted by: Julie at April 6, 2009 2:37 PM

Connie and I enjoy "adult cinema" now and again. Soft focus and a tender touch can really get the fires going. Sometimes the stories are downright ridiculous and we'll have to pause and recap things plot-wise.


Posted by: Conrad (last name withheld) at April 6, 2009 2:38 PM

You all can think of me as a thing if it will put me into your neat little conformist box.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 2:40 PM

you just said no one was arguing that it was empowering for women. The Pookie thing is/was.

Exactly. No rational intelligences posited that argument. Whenever a straw man might be conjured (in addition to other situations), Pookie shows up to embody it. It's simple Pajiba mechanics, really, and never worth prolonging an argument over.

Posted by: Jay at April 6, 2009 2:41 PM

Gotdammit, while I was reading the comments in this thread, my boss walked in and said, with no context, "Ok let's do this thing and let's keep it quick and dirty."

I'm scarred for life.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:42 PM

Softcore is porn in the same way chicken salad is chicken shit. We're talking about hardcore pornography, as you very well know, and from your earlier statements I feel pretty safe in assuming you find it utterly disgusting. To each his own, but let's not play semantic games.

My point was not to claim that women who go into porn weren't sexually abused in some way. I was arguing with your ironclad contention that only fucked up people go into porn, and that the only reason they're in porn is because they're fucked up. That may very well be true; I acknowledge that I could be wrong. I object to you pretending that your position is both unequivocally true and unequivocally universal simply because you don't like porn.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 6, 2009 2:43 PM

Jay I comprende. Gracias.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:43 PM

A fair enough point, Julie. But should I just say "HAL"? I welcome a succinct non-anthropic suggestion.

Posted by: Jay at April 6, 2009 2:43 PM

But you can’t resist Jay.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 2:44 PM

Pookie, I like to think of you as the guy with the unbeatable character from "Make Love Not Warcraft," except instead of playing Warcraft, you visit sites and make comments to get people all riled up.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 2:49 PM

Of course you’ve got to explain yourself to them Tracer, you broke a pajiba rule, never disagree with groupthink.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 2:49 PM

Tracer

I object to you pretending that your position is both unequivocally true and unequivocally universal simply because you don't like porn.

There's your mistake, right there. I assert that most women in porn have been sexually abused at some point in their past because that's what's borne out by the facts, not because of my own personal feelings about the subject. As I said to you above, I don't dislike it or hate it. I see it as something that just is and even something that, in certain contexts, I've found entertaining and pleasurable.

I'm blocked by firewalls right now, but do a Google Scholar search on the percentage of sexually abused women working in porn. Even better if you have access to a university search portal.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 2:50 PM

I'm not anti-porn by any means but the only porn I've viewed and actually enjoyed has been made by women for women and generally has nary a man to be found. There is something beautiful and empowering about seeing a woman enjoy sex, but as far as I've been able to see that ain't straight porn. Which, by the way, I think is incredibly sad.
Even the "better" straight porn has lots of look-at-me!-look-at-me! mugging for the camara that gives me a cold feeling in the pit of my stomach when I watch it.
My primary objection to most porn is that it makes sex kind of yucky and awful and that's just so incredibly wrong.

Posted by: king at April 6, 2009 2:54 PM

Actually puddin’ cup I visit this site and "Huffington Post," and "Daily Kos" mainly. I love reading about politics.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 2:54 PM

Puddin' do you really think I'm damaging myself by watching porn? I'd love and stay for this chat, but I gotta go to work now. Ya know, that thing I do to earn money so I can afford to buy more porn. I'll be damaging myself later tonight in honor of everyone here.

Posted by: Austin asking for trouble at April 6, 2009 2:55 PM

See, I wouldn't have guessed that Pookie. I don't know why, because you are a person on the internet, and you could be making that up, but I think you're starting to grow on me.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 2:59 PM

Snuggiepants, you said you found porn entertaining and pleasurable in certain contexts, what contexts would those be? Because there isn’t any context that does not include those very females that you claim to have been sexually abused. Please don’t tell me you’re one of those females that thinks her farts smell like potpourri?

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 3:03 PM

Is this where the group discussion on the correlations between World of Warcraft and modern American politics is taking place?

Posted by: admin at April 6, 2009 3:05 PM

Well puddin’ cup people are very complex, I would not assume to know anything about someone merely because on occasion they may write some fucked shit here at pajiba. That’s why I get a kick out of certain people here that think they can diagnose a motherfucka by something they wrote.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 3:10 PM

I'm calling into question the assertion, being presented as fact, that "most" women in porn have been sexually abused.

When and how did this become fact?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 3:12 PM

Me me me BSlim!! Um, through osmosis.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 3:17 PM

Pookie, I've answered your particular question a few times in this thread. Maybe more.

No one is stopping you from having at it, dude. No one. I'm not even suggesting it. Just don't kid yourself that this is such an awesome life plan for them.

Sure, I have found it pleasurable to watch here and there, but I know what I'm looking at. The overwhelming chances are that I'm looking at women who did this because it's what they know, because it's where they feel their value (and skill set) lies, and because they are short on other options. All of those things are interrelated, by the way.

If you still don't get it at this point, I can't help you.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 3:34 PM

I'm looking at women who did this because it's what they know, because it's where they feel their value (and skill set) lies, and because they are short on other options. All of those things are interrelated, by the way.

If you still don't get it at this point, I can't help you.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 3:34 PM
-------------------------------------------------
Where are you getting that from?

Keep in mind that we are in the era of Girls Gone Wild and "reality" tv where college grads are more than willing to whore out and fuck on some lame cable/network show for 15mins of alleged fame.

I'm not buying it.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 3:40 PM

BarbadoSlim:

Are college girls never sexually abused as children or teens?

And you do know, right, that a lot of the girls on things like Girls Gone Wild are not even in college, much less college grads? You can take any 20 year old and say she's in college. Does the audience care if that's true or not? Nope.

Oh there are women who will flash you after a few drinks, sure. I've been with them, LOL. They'll even do it in front of a camera. For free. And without any prior issues or troubles. We're not talking about that, though. We were talking about women who make their living in the porn industry.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 3:48 PM

BarbadoSlim: A lot of that has to do with the fact that a woman's value as a human being tends to be linked to her sexuality. Many women look for validation by flaunting their bodies. It is a fact. Yes, it is their choice, but our choices are almost always influenced by outside sources.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 3:56 PM

Poor Jenna went and turned into Jocelyn Wildenstein on us.

Thank god for film.

Posted by: Recondite at April 6, 2009 3:57 PM

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 3:48 PM

Well, the way I see it, it's all part of the same thing, same attitudes. Women, who have no problem with getting undressed and performing sexually for an audience. Be they college students/cosmetologists/secretaries or welfare recipients. I don't see any proof that a vast majority of them have been sexually molested, like you are declaring here.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 6, 2009 3:59 PM

Oh I see Snuggie, when your friends are flashing after a few drinks it’s all harmless fun, look at the fun smart girls everybody. Maybe your friends should stop drinking because drinking drives them to expose themselves, you should suggest counseling to your friends Snuggie.

Posted by: Pookie at April 6, 2009 4:01 PM

I'm going to side with BSlim on that one, I'm afraid. I don't think that the majority girls who appear on Girls Gone Wild and things of that sort are victims of abuse. I think that, for the most part, they just want attention, or to appear sexy and cool and "liberated." After all, nobody wants to be seen as a humourless, prudish feminist. Seriously, though, I think that some of them might have some daddy issues, but to say that they've probably been sexually abused at some point is a pretty big generalization. I still don't agree with it, though.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 4:09 PM

By "it" I mean their behaviour, by the way.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 4:09 PM

I think it could be argued that a somewhat significant percentage of women in general have either been sexually assaulted or otherwise abused in some way. Not all, or even most, of these women turn to life as porno stars, strippers, or prostitutes. I agree with Tracer - there are most likely a number of factors that go into the decision to enter the pornographic film business, just as there would be when any important life decision is made. And I highly doubt that every actress in every porno was abused as a young girl. Why is it impossible to think that perhaps they chose their career because that's what they want to do for a living? I guess I just don't see the big deal about porn - if that's what someone has chosen to do with their life, so be it. It doesn't make them a bad person, it doesn't make them ignorant nor does it make them trash. it just makes them willing to do something to pay the bills that other people aren't necessarily willing to do.

Kind of like becoming a lion tamer - only with your clothes off. Most people wouldn't dare do it, and plenty of people would think you were crazy for trying it, but they'd still watch you at work.

Posted by: Kolby at April 6, 2009 4:15 PM

Pookie, get a grip please. I said I've been around women doing this. You seem to have some issues of your own with porn. Work them out, for the love of God.

Barbado, I suggested to Tracer doing a Google Scholar search or better yet, a university research portal if you have access. For the search terms we're looking at, I get blocked at work (and mightily hope a log is not kept of such search attempts), but have at it. I really thought it was commonly known that the porn industry has a disproportionately high percentage of women who were sexually abused. And it really shouldn't be all that surprising.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 4:17 PM

"Me me me BSlim!! Um, through osmosis."

Jesus, Pooks - should the two of us ever cross paths, I'm buying you a drink...

"...we are in the era of Girls Gone Wild and "reality" tv where college grads are more than willing to whore out and fuck on some lame cable/network show..."

Jesus, BSlim - should the two of us ever cross paths, I'm buying you one too...

Take what BSlim just said about "reality" television... I think that shit's more degrading than anything - especially given that nowadays, people have made a goddam career out of whoring themselves out on these shows. I mean, fucksake, how many of those Real World/Road Rules dipshits have returned to make complete and total jackasses of themselves year after year? Jesus, there was a lady on there (Beth?) who was OLDER THAN ME participating in that mindless bullshit. Then there's the ones who line up to get friggin' annihilated and actually fight over who's gonna fuck/be BFFs with the likes of Bret Michaels, Flavor Flav, Tila Tequila, New York, and Napalm Vag... Not only do these jackasses make complete and utter fools of themselves publicly, but more often than not, we can tune in and watch them do it all day, motherfucking marathon-style. And the worst thing about it? People line-up to be the next goddam moron. Dipshit adolescents think "reality-star" is a legitimate career choice, that being on I Love Money or Tool Academy is something to aspire to. Granted, once you pop your cherry on film, it's out there forever. Granted, there are many pornographic actors/actresses who have hit absolute rock bottom due to addiction and being taken advantage of. Granted, there are films in that genre that set out to be degrading, disrespectful, and even violent towards women (and in some cases, men). But catch an episode of Rock of Love, and tell me that watching too-drunk-to-stand mothers/daughters who brawl over who gets to fuck an ex-hair metal icon is any worse. "Reality", along with the celebration of greed, stupidity and instant fame is shoved down our goddam throats every friggin' day, and quite frankly, it makes my belly hurt...

I gotta make a dook...

Posted by: Skitz at April 6, 2009 4:22 PM

Puddin' cup I never said a majority of the girls on things like Girls Gone Wild were sexually abused. I was responding to this:

Keep in mind that we are in the era of Girls Gone Wild and "reality" tv where college grads are more than willing to whore out and fuck on some lame cable/network show for 15mins of alleged fame.

Inside that quote you'll find the assumptions that
a) all the girls in things like Girls Gone Wild are college grads and
b) college grads or college students aren't ever the victims of sexual abuse.

I disagreed with both, NOT that a lot of the girls in Girls Gone Wild are sexual abuse victims. I even said that there are plenty of women who will flash a camera, especially after a few drinks, and they don't all have issues contributing to it.

And this:

I think it could be argued that a somewhat significant percentage of women in general have either been sexually assaulted or otherwise abused in some way. Not all, or even most, of these women turn to life as porno stars, strippers, or prostitutes...

I said that very thing very early in this thread. Not everyone who has been sexually abused goes into porn! But a large number of women IN porn (not drunken girls flashing their boobs to a camera, but women who make their living in porn on a regular basis) have been.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 4:24 PM

Whoops, that last quote I was responding to was from Kolby, I should have added her name in there.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 6, 2009 4:25 PM

Kolby - I think it could be argued that a somewhat significant percentage of
women in general have either been sexually assaulted or otherwise abused in some way.

Sadly, that is true.

Kolby - Not all, or even most, of these women turn to life as porno stars,
strippers, or prostitutes.

It's as though different people react to things differently. Are you hoping for
some sort of mathematical equation {P=(Violation)/age} to forecast potential
outcomes?

Kolby - And I highly doubt that every actress in every porno was abused as a young girl.

Why not look up the evidence?

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 4:29 PM

Fair enough, Snuggiepants. I guess I misunderstood what you were trying to say. I do agree with the majority of what you're saying.

Posted by: puddin' cup at April 6, 2009 4:32 PM

I gotta make a dook...

As in a shit, or a reality show? As awesome as a Skittian show might be, I'd have to kill you just on principle..

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 6, 2009 4:37 PM

Point me in the direction of the most recent study, My Name Is, and I'd be glad to. I'm just thinking along the lines of common sense here - the odds are against every actress in porn having the exact same background and reasons for getting into their business. Yes, it's certainly possible that many porn stars were sexually abused at some point in their lifetimes, and that their career is serving as a sort of coping mechanism. But to say that is why all porn stars do what they do is going a bit too far in my opinion.

Posted by: Kolby at April 6, 2009 4:37 PM

If Sex Positive Feminists in the '70s and '80s could have seen the current outcome of their fight against the patriarchy, would they have been proud? 'Cause I think they cracked the door and the flood swept it completely off its hinges.
SPF sounds so innocuous, but now it's almost a requirement to flaunt our sexuality. But none of those almost hardwired biases against women's sexuality have changed. I'm glad I'm not a teen trying to make sense of it.

Posted by: king at April 6, 2009 4:41 PM

Poor Jenna went and turned into Jocelyn Wildenstein on us.

I thought so too. Egad! There's a real tragedy in the performing arts of "wow, I thought you were pretty and natural looking! Didn't you like that about yourself?"

Posted by: Jay at April 6, 2009 4:45 PM

I do watch and enjoy porn on occasion, but do find a lot of it shows the women being treated quite roughly. I think more woman would enjoy and use porn if that wasn't a factor.

Posted by: grinder at April 6, 2009 4:56 PM

The thing that all of you are forgetting, and the most relevant piece of information to this debate is this: Abused as a child or not, whether or not they enjoy it, do it for the cash or attention; they are fucking, for money, for you. They are getting paid to do things some people only get to fantasize about. They are choosing to do it, for whatever reasons. Those reasons are their own.

Stop analyzing it, and stop making porn not fun.

Posted by: Dagon at April 6, 2009 5:48 PM

I find the idea that sexual abuse = porno star really annoying. It's bad enough when ignorant fucks imply (or outright state!) that 'they must have been asking for it', without the added joy of hearing that your entire career options now apparently involve cameras, pasties and/or dicks up your arse. It'd be nice, if, after being the victim of a crime, you didn't have to be the victim of society's bullshit as well.

Frankly, given how many people suffer some form of sexual abuse in their lives, you'd probably find that most careers have a 'high proportion' of abuse victims.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at April 6, 2009 6:10 PM

... and Kolby just said the same thing. Sorry, Kolby.

But as requested, I just did a search on Pubmed (main resource for scientific articles). I couldn't actually find an article specifically examining sexual abuse with different career choices. There were a few examining 'personal history' of 'sexual deviants' so I'm left to wonder if maybe a lot of these links exist because people are looking for them.
You might be interested to know, however, that I also found a few articles examining the level of childhood sexual abuse amongst physicians, clinicans and nurses. So I guess we have to consider these to be degrading careers as well, now. Right?

Posted by: ScienceGeek at April 6, 2009 6:32 PM

Kolby - My research ...

In Female Chauvinist Pigs, Ariel Levy talked to people in the industry about
this and they confirmed that the vast majority of porn stars were victims of
sexual abuse or rape. « It's a cliche that bears repeating (and substantiating)
that most women in the sex industry have been victims of sexual abuse.
Unfortunately it's difficult to find reliable statistics on this subject for two
reasons: women in the sex industry are often reluctant to talk to researchers
because of the stigma - and, sometimes, laws - against what they do; and,
in many of the studies that do exist, the researchers sound so irate it can be
difficult to determine if they are biased extremists or if their outrage is
simply the natural product of doing research in a field in which the findings are
so frequently heartbreaking.

Dr Melissa Farley, a psychologist and researcher [...] says that the vast
majority of women in the sex industry have experienced incest or other
childhood sexual abuse. Estimates range from 65 to 90 percent, and she is
inclined to believe the highest numbers, as
are all the other experts I spoke with."

Posted by: My Name Is for My Friends at April 6, 2009 8:05 PM

My name is for my friends - Ariel Levy's book was specifically about the ways that women are pressured into sex. Dr Melissa Farley is the founder of 'Prostitution Research & Education', whose website states that they are 'offering services to women escaping prostitution' and quotes 'It takes a village to make a prostitute'.

I'm not disrepecting their work in any way, but both have them have a substantial bias. If you can find a peer reviewed study comparing the number of sexual abuse victims in porn versus, say, mental health care, then let me know.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at April 6, 2009 8:54 PM

And all these years I've been giving it away for free....

Posted by: Porkchop at April 6, 2009 10:31 PM

They could have just titled it The Thora Birch Story. Both of her parents have hard core credits on IMDB or IAFD if you're a true cognoscenti but she went mainstream instead of heading into porn.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at April 6, 2009 10:47 PM

Aside: According to the doco Sex: the Annabel Chong Story, she (Grace Quek) was gang raped while in London to study law. Shortly after, her porn career started.

I agree an awful lot of straight porn is depressing, misogynistic horseshit that obsessively pursues “extreme” at the expense of “erotic”. I must be in the minority, because I really can’t see the appeal of women being passed around like vacuous fuckdolls, gagging/choking, “dirty talk” that sounds like it was written by a 14 year old, obligatory anal sex (did I miss a memo? Do all women love it now? I simply must tell the wife), etc, etc, etc… To underline my minority status, I have never understood the aesthetic appeal of that old fashioned porn staple, the money shot. What's the symbolism here- marking territory?

My main problem with porn is what it could be, but rarely is: quality production and healthy fun. Something that demands a modicum of respect for it’s participants and the audience, and maybe even a reasonable dose of filmmaking skill. Something that might even encourage a healthy attitude to sex on film and the performers who choose to do it. I won't hold my breath.

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at April 6, 2009 11:20 PM

What the hell happened here? I've been busy watching porn.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 7, 2009 12:34 AM

I think that Dave Shepard and grinder make some of the only constructive comments on this thread - porn has a lot of room for improvement. Obviously, some people enjoy it the way it is, which is fine. However, as a woman I would like to see a wider variety with less rough behavior toward women and/or the "dead eyes" phenomenon. How we get there is probably another discussion.

Posted by: Amy at April 7, 2009 3:40 AM

Having seen The Annabelle Chong Story, I have to say that she comes across as pretty darn fucked up for all the empowerment she claims it gives her.
I suggest anyone who would like to use her story as an argument for the empowerment of women in porn, should watch the documentary first.
I saw her as a sad, damaged girl who was desperate for attention, and who had talked herself into the idea that she was strong enough.
Maybe I'm wrong, but aside from her issues with gaining acceptance from her family, she seemed hell-bent on destroying herself e.g.
she refused to ever used condoms because she felt sex was "worth dying for".

Posted by: missh at April 7, 2009 10:05 AM

Is it just me or is Jenna Jameson starting to look like Jocelyn Wildenstein (the NY socialite (e.g. cat woman) who has had way too much surgery)? Also, should I have had more parenthesis in this comment?

Posted by: SoupSandwich at April 7, 2009 11:57 AM

Soup:

"Poor Jenna went and turned into Jocelyn Wildenstein on us.

Thank god for film.

Posted by: Recondite at April 6, 2009 3:57 PM"


You should be more circumspect.

Posted by: Recondite at April 7, 2009 1:57 PM

You damn crusaders and your causes, trying to make people behave like you want them to.

Good luck with that.

Posted by: Recondite at April 7, 2009 2:06 PM

Recondite,

There was such a long string on this one topic that I just went to the bottom and posted what seemed like an original thought. I guess great minds think alike.

SS

Posted by: SoupSandwich at April 7, 2009 3:50 PM

Okay...I am not getting into the empowerment debate ...I have had pretty normal exposure to porn in my adulthood. I watched some cheezy internet porn recently and after a while, it got boring.

It bugs me that the women don't seem to have orgasms in these things. There doesn't seem to be an effort to get the woman off, like her pleasure is gleaned from penetration only...oh, and the outrageous hugeness of cock. Yawn.

I had to break up with a guy recently because he had no idea how to pleasure a woman orally, and refused to do so. His impression was that all women climaxed through penetration only. That he didn't have to do anything to move things along in that direction. He watched a lot of internet porn and thought that p in v was all he had to do to get someone off.

The problem with most porn, for me, is that it lacks intimacy. I agree that it is mostly hilarious and ridiculous. It's also unfortunate that a lot of people are growing up believing that what happens in porn is reality and have no idea what they are doing when it comes time to deal with an actual person. It's also problematic if only because it seems that people need more extreme scenarios and situations to get themselves off.

And there is, of course, always the likelihood that they end up being horrible lovers.

Posted by: Kelly Booth at April 7, 2009 11:15 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time