web
counter
 

In A New HBO/Scorsese Documentary, George Harrison Is A Material Girl Living In The Material World

By Rob Payne | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (25)



pajibageorgeharrisonlivingmaterialworld.jpg

When I first discovered The Beatles, in the heyday of high school in the late 1990s, I was most definitely a John Lennon Man. Paul McCartney always seemed like he was just in it for the chicks, and Ringo Starr was merely along for the ride. George Harrison was the likable, talented workhorse but not worth the attention of my arty pretentiousness — I also thought I was the only teenager who liked Bob Dylan, Jimi Hendrix, and Kurt Vonnegut. (I was, how you say, the worst.) In college, I remember being asked several times: Paul McCartney or John Lennon? (After, of course, being asked: The Beatles or Elvis Presley, because I went to film school and Quentin Tarantino is God there.) The answer was always (The Beatles, immediately followed by) John Lennon, and it didn’t hurt that, at my absolute best, I kind of resembled Julian’s and Sean’s dad.

Even today it is still remarkably easy to identify with Lennon’s geeky music romanticism, but as I’ve gotten a little older, it has become increasingly clear that the choice between The Beatles’ dual frontmen is patently false. The real answer is, and always was and will be, George Harrison and his unadorned realism. As much as I love Imagine and McCartney (or, at least, “Imagine” and “Maybe I’m Amazed”), Harrison’s album All Things Must Pass is the best non-Beatles Beatle recording of all time. I come to that conclusion because it contains real world ideas and concerns, and not merely pop pabulum or drug-induced mindscapes. If not for “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” (and, sure, a dozen other brilliant songs in The Beatles catalog) All Things would just be the best Beatles thing ever.

HBO and Martin Scorsese, who both have pretty prestigious documentary stripes, seem to agree, at least according to the trailer for their two-part film on the man who helped bankroll the Monty Python films, George Harrison: Living in the Material World.

Watch:


It will be interesting to see how deep Scorsese goes, or if the movie ends up just kissing a dead man’s ass for several hours. Honestly, I would probably be okay with either option, because the quality of the production itself looks damn good. But what do you think? Is George your guy, and if so, do you want a warts n’ all approach, or are you still wrapped up in the mystique of Lennon v. McCartney? Or, are you insane and prefer Ringo Starr, of all The Beatles?

Rob Payne also writes the indie comic book The Unstoppable Force, co-hosts the internet radio show We’re Not Fanboys, and can be tweeted @RobOfWar on the Twitter. He doesn’t mean any offense to Ringo, after all, he did inspire this.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



In the First Poster the Marilyn Monroe film, "My Week with Marilyn," Michelle Williams Pops Off the Page | The Sun Will Never Shine On This Cold Dead Heart Of Mine: New Clips From "The Walking Dead," Season 2









Comments

Ringo was always my favorite. After the Beatles broke up, it was Ringo who first came out with a string of hits. Although to be fair, I always felt that Ringo was a hired hand.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 24, 2011 11:08 AM

I must be insane because Ringo is my favorite Beatle, and it's precisely because he was along for the ride. He wasn't pushing half-baked spirituality or transparent hippyocrisy. Plus, he snagged the most beautiful wife out of all of them!

Posted by: Monte X. Hector at August 24, 2011 11:14 AM

Always John. And Plastic Ono Band is easily my pick for best of their solo albums. That is as 'real' as an album gets, in my humble opinion.

Can't wait for this documentary.

Posted by: Caillan at August 24, 2011 11:19 AM

Well, as a kid, I friggin' LOVED George Harrison's "Got My Mind Set On You," or, more accurately, the video for ths song, so I think he's always been my favorite.

But really, what endeared him to me most was reading about his friendship with the Monty Python crew in Michael Palin's "Diaries." I had no idea he was a producer for their films (I never pay attention to names in credits). If he was a big fan of their work, then how could I not like him?

And "Sometimes" is just a lovely song.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at August 24, 2011 11:26 AM

I have always loved George. When I first got into the Beatles as a pre-teen, it was because he was the shy, quiet one (I also loved Wil Wheaton because of Gordie in Stand By Me at the time, so that was clearly my "type"). It wasn't until I first heard All Things that he became my favorite simply because he is AMAZING. George forever.

Posted by: Andie at August 24, 2011 11:26 AM

George was an amazing talent. I think there's brilliant stuff from both his Beatles and Solo work, and also some of the Traveling Wilburys stuff that carries his mark.

I still tear up when watching "A Concert for George". (Yes, I am that cheesy, thankyouverymuch.)

But I'm not sure what was with the sitar fascination. Seriously.

Posted by: NateS1973 at August 24, 2011 11:36 AM

Ooooh, this documentary looks good. Call me a sucker for cheesy pop music, but I have always been drawn to Paul McCartney over John Lennon. But who doesn't love George Harrison? I will definitely be seeing this.

Posted by: Rachel at August 24, 2011 11:57 AM

George was/is my favorite Beatle. Here Comes The Sun is one of my all time favorite songs. It gives me hope in my heart when I hear it. Looking forward to this doc.

Posted by: ChickaBoom! at August 24, 2011 11:58 AM

I was 11 when the Beatles first appeared on the Sullivan show. Each of my three sisters and I received a Beatle doll (still have mine in the box). I don't know how I ended up with Ringo. Always thought he was the luckiest man in show business and couldn't stand to hear him sing. "It don't come easy"...my sweet lord, indeed.

Posted by: DenG at August 24, 2011 11:58 AM

Yeah, I'm with George. The Beatles are so great on so many levels, though, that it's almost a disservice to try to rank them. I'm looking forward to this doc too.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 24, 2011 12:06 PM

George has always been my Beatle, ever since I was about three years old and saw him doing that little dance he used to do while playing guitar (if you've never seen it, check out the old B&W footage: your heart will melt). I have both Concert for Bangladesh and Concert for George on DVD.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 24, 2011 12:19 PM

I love the Beatles, always have. John's my favorite, followed closely by George and Paul (I was on board with Ringo until he became a crotchety old man.)

I think it was Jay Mohr who pointed out that God was taking the Beatles to heaven according to the amount of talent each member had. If this is true, you're next, Macca...

Posted by: SugarKane at August 24, 2011 12:27 PM

"Nobody loves Ringo Starr"
"That's what I love about him"

Posted by: quirk at August 24, 2011 12:28 PM

Always a Beatle fan. When I was very young (13 in the 8th grade) I was a McCartney fan. When I met my best friend in the 10th grade I became a John Lennon fan. Later that year when All Things Must Pass came out, we both became George Harrison fans and stayed fans. We were lucky to have seen him in concert during his Dark Horse tour. I can't wait to see the documentary.

Posted by: Bobby C at August 24, 2011 12:31 PM

I think John Lennon had the most sheer talent, but he was also very smug. He seemed like he could be a real shit. I love the music he created, but I found him personally grating.

George Harrison might have been a notch down in out-there brilliance (but only a notch), but he seemed like such a sincere person, someone with a lot of honest integrity.

Really though, picking your favorite Beatle is like picking your favorite ice cream flavor. Can't I just love them all?

Posted by: Freller at August 24, 2011 12:36 PM

Freller:

You're right. As talented as Lennon was, he has come across as insufferably smug in everything I've read or heard from him since the Beatles broke up. I always hated how much he downplayed the talents of George and Ringo. If I hadn't already loved George, I would have loved him merely for refusing to let Yoko perform at Concert for Bangladesh because really, Queen of the Talentless Hangers-On right there.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 24, 2011 12:41 PM

George is my Beatle. Always George. What a lovely soul.

I can't wait to see this.

Posted by: linny at August 24, 2011 12:44 PM

I always get all blabby and rambling when it comes to The Beatles, so I'll try to contain that, but George was always my favorite. My father, uncle, brother, and I tried to determine who was our favorite by listing our Top 15 favorite Beatles songs and then determining who wrote which, whoever writing the most being our "favorite". While Lennon had the top 2, Paul still edged out George by one. However, even after all that I didn't feel right about it, and still declared George my favorite.

I don't really know what I want exactly out of the documentary, I guess just that it is good and does the man a service. It can have the warts, because I still think the man's character would shine positive through it. I mean, he loved Monty Python, right?

And Imagine and McCartney have "Oh Yoko!" and "Every Night", respectively. Come ahn.

Posted by: =DocDoom1= at August 24, 2011 1:05 PM

I always thought George had the sweetest eyes and he has always been my favourite Beatle and, in fact, was one of my first celebrity crushes when I was a wee girl. (My other crushes were Sean Astin esp. as Mikey in the Goonies and Gene Wilder, so maybe I was a bit unusual.)

Posted by: scary biscuits at August 24, 2011 1:27 PM

McCartney. Hands down the most talented of the four, in terms of creating songs with sheer commercial appeal (plus some true masterpieces). Lennon was talented but, boy, did he sometimes come across as a self-involved mama's boy, the apotheosis of this coming with the "bed-in" that he and Yoko organized. If you want peace, roll up your sleeves and work for it - don't lie in bed for however many days, smoke up a storm, and tell everyone how wonderful you are because you're "bedding-in" for peace. I've had less respect for him as the years go by, though I'll always admit he had a lot of talent. George, I like, but in a neutral way. "Something," though, is the best Beatles song - heck, one of the greatest songs - ever.

Posted by: Whatever4 at August 24, 2011 1:49 PM

One theory would be that, during the Beatles heyday, George Martin (Beatles producer) pushed the Lennon/McCartney songs since they were more commercial and would make more money. A Harrison style album would have found a smaller audience. So Harrison took a background position. It looks like Marty might be righting that wrong.

Posted by: Mickey at August 24, 2011 2:23 PM

My dear old dad always used to be a George guy. Took many years for me to see how that could possibly be; John being the clear and obvious choice in my younger years.

George is like fine wine - matures better than all the others.

Posted by: zeke the pig at August 24, 2011 4:01 PM

lame question really.... as the answer is and always will be: all four of them. to raise one above the other is to dismantle the whole. none of them would have been who and what they were/are without each other! period.

granted it took me a long time to come to that conclusion, as i grew up a paul girl and then proceeded over the past 45 years to favor each of them at different times and for different reasons.

Posted by: maxwell at August 24, 2011 6:25 PM

I'll watch anything on the Beatles. Anything.

Posted by: NeoCleo at August 24, 2011 7:26 PM

The Beatles were four amazingly talented individuals, but George wrote more of the songs that ended up on my favorites list. Not just Here Comes The Sun, What is Life, and All Things Must Pass, but also Photograph, Flying, I Need You and just about all the collaborative works with the Traveling Wilburys.

I miss him.

Posted by: funtime42 at August 25, 2011 11:21 AM