free counter with statistics Edge of Darkness Trailer | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

edge-darkness1.jpg
Give Me Back My (Dead) Daughter!


Are We Ready to Forgive Mel Gibson? / Dustin Rowles

Trailers | October 15, 2009 | Comments (65)


Martin Campbell’s Edge of Darkness should be a decent litmus test for the rest of Mel Gibson’s career. It’s the sort of movie that’s right in his wheelhouse (he plays a detective), it comes from a higher caliber of director (Campbell also directed Casino Royale and Goldeneye), and, well, the trailer looks pretty decent. Like Taken, only in Boston (and I’m a sucker for Boston-based flicks), and the lead is searching not for his daughter, but for his daughter’s killer. The question is: Is it compelling enough to overlook Gibson’s Antisemitism? Are we willing to take a stand against Gibson’s work only so long as he’s making bad films? Or will we avoid a credible thriller out of protest?

Question’s not really to me: I have a legitimate excuse to see it, whether it’s good or not. But what about the rest of you? Does the movie look decent enough to forgive Gibson, and should that even factor into your decision? Or should we simply take an actor’s personal feelings toward an entire culture out of the equation all together?

What do y’all think, sugartits?



We Love You Bromantic Comedy | Dexter S4/E3 "Blinded by the Light"



Comments

You know, Gibson's a really, really good actor. Do you think being mentally unbalanced helps with that?

When I started posting my reply I thought I knew the answer to your question, Dustytits...But as soon as I started typing I started re-thinking, and now I honestly don't know. Will I watch Polanski's next movie? Will I watch Mel Gibson or Jon Voigt? Is there a line, and if so, where is it: somewhere between shitbrained opinions and the actual rape of a child? Or...headache now, owie.

Fortunately this type of movie doesn't ring any of my bells, so for me it's still an academic question.

Posted by: Jerce at October 15, 2009 11:43 AM

i must give this an almighty yes

i personally don't give a rat's hootnanny about an actor's personal beliefs, i'm a fan of film, and this shit looks bananacreampieriffic

but that's just me ;]

Posted by: billythekidd at October 15, 2009 11:44 AM

Is it compelling enough to overlook Gibson’s Antisemitism? Are we willing to take a stand against Gibson’s work only so long as he’s making bad films? Or will we avoid a credible thriller out of protest?

As long as someone can redeem themselves through art, bad behavior can be forgiven to an extent. Hell, Ike Turner beat the shit out of Tina, but he may have invented rock and roll, Elvis Costello called Ray Charles a stupid, blind nigger, but he still made great music, and Dr. Dre is by all accounts a sociopath, but the guy gave us Eminem and the N.W.A.

They're all shitty human beings, and deserve a good punch to the kisser, but I wont knock an ability just because someone sucks as a human being.

Posted by: George at October 15, 2009 11:46 AM

I never cared much that Mel is an alcoholic antisemite. Everyone needs a hobby. What I can't stand is he has gotten old. I hate old people.

Posted by: EricD at October 15, 2009 11:49 AM

It looks like they're capitalizing on that Taken formula, right down to the January release date. This looks like a solid modern noir flick, and Gibson + Winstone + Huston = must see. Consider my ticket bought.

Also, when an actor/actress goes off the deep end, I usually try to separate their personal life from their professional life. It works for the most part, but I've only ever really had to do it for Cruise, and now Gibson. I'll enjoy Gibson the Actor, but will continue to mock Gibson the Douchebag.

One last thing...did anyone else get a sick chuckle out of the Jesus analogy he tosses out there at the end of the trailer?

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at October 15, 2009 11:51 AM

Elvis Costello sucks as a human being? Take that back, George! Take it back now!

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at October 15, 2009 11:51 AM

No one does a revenge flick like Mel. They are his speciality.

I'm in...

Posted by: East Coast Ugly at October 15, 2009 11:52 AM

I still have a soft spot for Gibson. Can't explain it. Despite the anti-semiticism, the alcoholism, the sexism, the disregard for birth control, the penchant for getting Russian chicks pregnant......well, he's still Braveheart. And Lethal Weapon. And Mad Max. So I'll probably see this one. If anything, the Man Without a Face was a bigger offense to humanity.

Posted by: sheepeyes at October 15, 2009 11:53 AM

I was going to comment about how I just realized Mel used to have an Australian accent but then I watched that trailer and all was erased in a wave of "What the Fuck? WAS THAT A NINJA!?"

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at October 15, 2009 11:54 AM

Mel Gibson plays the same kind of character in his films. Straight, white male. Strong and relatively silent. It's a persona. Not a character. And that's fine. Lots of actors have made careers out of playing the same guy. (We're looking at you, Hugh Grant.) Only now, when I see Mel Gibson, I'm gonna think straight , white male, strong and relatively silent, but an asshole. Nope. Not seeing this one.

If he comes back and plays a straight man who's brutally anally raped for hours in a film that's made with the same detail for torture as in "The Passion of the Christ," I'm all in. I'll even buy the popcorn.

Posted by: khia213 at October 15, 2009 11:57 AM

George, you best get to steppin' before Jay gets here and reads that.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at October 15, 2009 11:58 AM

It would be easier to cast him and his projects aside if the evidence of his anti semitism was more than a drunken tirade in which he referred to a cop as "sugartits" and massive speculation surrounding a nearly (translated) verbatim bible film. As it is, he just seems unhinged- but wasn't that always the point of Mel?

Posted by: dk at October 15, 2009 11:58 AM

Meh. I wasn't really into the trailer so I don't think I'll feel a great loss if I don't see this the minute it comes out.

As for Gibson himself, well… you can't help crazy. Doesn't excuse what he has done or will do but I've got a lot of crazy floating around my family so I'm willing to accept crazy a lot more readily than I'll accept otherwise rational people committing criminal actions.

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at October 15, 2009 11:59 AM

Whoa, wait a minute. I love Elvis, both in regular form and Costello, but the guy made a dick move right there, and you can't deny that.

Posted by: George at October 15, 2009 12:01 PM

If I worried about the personal lives of those who make movies, play football, write books, build cars, etc, etc I'd be stuck doing puppet theater for my kids and traveling around like a barefoot Aborigine on walkabout.

Posted by: ed newman at October 15, 2009 12:03 PM

Is Tom Cruise a fucking loon? Yep. Are MI:3 and Minority Report fucking awesome? Yep.

Did Roman Polanski rape a young girl? Yep. Will I still watch Rosemary's Baby? Yep.

Is Gibson a relatively unhinged Anti-Semite? Yep. Will I watch this movie? Fuck yep.

An actor/director's degree of talent v.s. personal life and decisions are two different things. If someone doesn't want to watch this based on what they think of Gibson, so be it. Bottom line for me? It looks like a pretty goddam solid flick. I'll be seeing it...

Posted by: Skitz at October 15, 2009 12:06 PM

I'm perfectly willing to separate an actor/director/writer/whatever's life from their artistic output. If I didn't, my hatred would prevent me from seeing works by a ton of people, from Alfred Hitchcock (pompous ass who claims the thing he hated the most about filmmaking was working with actors; also my second favorite director of all time) to Patti Lupone (total unadulterated bitch in real life and notoriously rude during productions; also my favorite working theater actress).

That said, I'm not the target audience for "I want my [insert relation here] back" films even when they're Oscar bait. I don't like The Changeling. I really don't like Mystic River. I even dislike Flight Plan for the same fundamental reason, though for once the lead performance makes gives me something to like. I think Don't Look Now is the only film I can think of with this kind of material that I actually enjoy.

So, will this make me forget about the Sugartits incident? Nope. I'll probably never even see the film.

Posted by: Robert at October 15, 2009 12:19 PM

no. not ready.

Posted by: anikitty at October 15, 2009 12:21 PM

George, Here's a tip that will serve you well in college:
If you are going to make a really provocative statement that may incite discord,
Cite your source.
Linky-linky, no more stinky.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 15, 2009 12:28 PM

I don't care how batshit crazy 'ol Mel is. If we refused to consider art or literature because of the transgressions of the artist, it would be a boring world indeed. So what if Mel is a sexist-racist-bible-thumper. Are we the thought police? Did he act out on his beliefs in a destructive way? (really, I never read that he did, so correct me if I missed the bad acts) He said some truly stupid shit while drunk. Whoop-de-fucking-doo. Since when is it a mortal sin to be stupid in public? The Drunk Driving is the most heinous of his misdeeds, and he is certainly not the first to fall there. He should be held responsible for that reprehensible act and pay his dues, just like anyone else. Enough with the pearl-clutching already.

And, I am seriously considering changing my handle to Sugar Tits.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 15, 2009 12:43 PM

FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOM!!!!

...to hate on the Jews...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 15, 2009 12:44 PM

"Are MI:3 ... fucking awesome?"

Is Skitz an outta his fucking mind lunatic? Yes. Do enjoy his lunacy, you bettcha!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 15, 2009 12:47 PM

Okay, not as highbrow as the ongoing philosophical discussion of if the man can be seperate from his work, but...

Is it just me, or does Gibson look an awful lot like Robert DeNiro now? Right down to the scrunched face brow furrow, and especially the hair?

Posted by: Jacktrade at October 15, 2009 12:48 PM

I live in Costa Rica, and apparently Mel spends a lot of his time here nowadays. My mother ran into him and the music/video store at the mall by our house recently. She said he was really friendly to everyone there, so I guess the tropics agree with him.

Posted by: L27 at October 15, 2009 12:53 PM

my problem is not with what he thinks but that he uses his money to make other people think the same thing.

By seeing his movies that I may like I am helping him earn money that he then uses to make movies I really don't like or to build an enormous antisemitic church.

Posted by: Arib at October 15, 2009 12:54 PM

I like Gibson because he gives liberals one tiny little peek at what it's like to be a non-liberal who has some degree of taste and interest in the dramatic arts.

On the one hand I'm surprised that the overall mood is that he can be forgiven his objectionable attitudes on account of his oeuvre because I would expect liberal elements to be less accustomed to swallowing their beliefs to enjoy a good performance. On the other hand maybe that's just it: one guy isn't a big deal when most of the rest of the industry is in step.

Posted by: Eep at October 15, 2009 12:55 PM

I'll wait for the review, sweetcheeks.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 15, 2009 12:56 PM

Looks good. I'll bite...but....

"You better decide...are you hanging on the cross, or banging in the nails."

Really, Mel? We get it, you're Catholic. Yeah, we saw The Passion. Almighty sucked, that did. I'm willing to give you another chance, after re-watching The Road Warrior last weekend, and remembering how loverly your ass was in Lethal Weapon. So, you can STOP beating us over the head with Catholic imagery, ok? Seriously? Oh, and, by the way....don't keep playing the good Catholic when you are schtupping a 20-something wannabe Eastern European while the woman who bore you nearly Duggeresque amounts of kids sits at home. Counting all your money, true, but still. Don't be an ass.

Just....go kick some ass. THAT'S the Mel we want.

Posted by: dammitjanet at October 15, 2009 12:58 PM

Also: I caught a few minutes of Letterman the other night, so I guess I'm in a forgive and forget mood. As long as a guy is a dick to someone else and not to me personally, you rude little pig.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 15, 2009 1:05 PM

My two cents is that you have to ask yourself, 'What am I owed by this person?'. The answer is usually in direct relation to the impact you felt of whatever they did.

I think that at this stage of my life, I don't believe anyone owes me anything, unless I was personally wronged. That doesn't mean I don't have a stake in someone/a situation that commits a wrong upon someone else, just that I am not the person to which an accounting must be offered.

When the offender pays his price, in the agreed upon way (as dictated by a just society), they have completed the circle and deserve to move forward. It's the only answer. If it's not enough of a price, rally to change the rules.

I think it should then become a matter of informed absolution - a form of mindful awareness, acceptance and expectation.

Because if I can be such a different person from the total f*cking dipstick I used to be, I think it is possible for other people to acquire a profound change in character as well. People need the space to live and learn.

Posted by: replica at October 15, 2009 1:19 PM

Listen, just because the rest of Hollywood (and I'm sure plenty of regular people) haven't outed their prejudices, or been caught red-mouthed, doesn't mean they don't have them. Does it suck? Yes. Will I stop seeing anything by someone who is prejudiced or affiliated with anyone who is prejudiced or committed a crime? Honestly, I doubt it - I mean, that criteria could exclude a good portion of the industry.

Posted by: Cindy at October 15, 2009 1:23 PM

I just wanted to say that the still was a great choice to accompany the forgiveness question.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 15, 2009 1:23 PM

I have to admit, while I'm not a big fan of Mel's personal escapades, the trailer does look good.

Posted by: bignick at October 15, 2009 1:24 PM

Weird...
The sound wasn't working for this clip on my computer.
So I don't know if Mel blamed the Jews for killing his daughter or not.
But that's all I could think of him saying.

Posted by: Odnon at October 15, 2009 1:24 PM

This looks good. Count me in. I don't give a rat's ass about Gibson's personal belief's and they have no bearing on whether or not I see a movie that he's in.

Posted by: sosumi at October 15, 2009 1:44 PM

my problem is not with what he thinks but that he uses his money to make other people think the same thing.

Hmmm... that's funny... I've seen lots of his movies, and I don't hate Jews or women. Am I supposed to? (I even saw the Passion....) If that's the case, then he's doing it wrong.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at October 15, 2009 1:48 PM


Jerce, what did Jon Voight do? Is there some scandal I missed?

Posted by: amberlark at October 15, 2009 1:54 PM

I agree with the smart lady above. (AvB, that is, if my comment is preempted by another before it gets posted).

Posted by: Rykker at October 15, 2009 1:59 PM

Voight is openly conservative, amberlark.

Posted by: Eep at October 15, 2009 2:08 PM

Hey i love this guys movie , i mean i sat through maverick at least 2-3 times . He is a very entertaining person .
I mean okay so the Jew hating is a lil much.
But its mel gibson . we let our hollywood types get away with far worse . Hell Matthew Broderick killed someone and walked with a fine.

Posted by: gilp at October 15, 2009 2:17 PM

The best actors are and have always been batshit crazy and Mel is no exception.

No, no boycott here.

Posted by: courtney at October 15, 2009 2:26 PM

The Elvis Costello business people are talking about above was a) explained and b) apologized for before some of you were even born.

Costello was drunk. He was being (in his estimation) harrassed by a couple of social climbers who wouldn't leave him alone, and in a (drunken) effort to shock them and get them to leave him alone, he gave the notorious response to one of their questions.

Naturally the assholes then made the incident as public as they could.

Costello is so very obviously not a racist that this whole business still infuriates me--so much so that I am compelled to come and comment about it on a Pajiba Love to try to set the record straight.

Posted by: Jerce at October 15, 2009 2:33 PM

Also, I'm so upset that I thought I was commenting on Pajiba Love. I think I need a drink.

Posted by: Jerce at October 15, 2009 2:39 PM

How is it obvious that Elvis Costello isn't a racist?

Posted by: Eep at October 15, 2009 2:40 PM

Whoa, wait a minute. I love Elvis, both in regular form and Costello, but the guy made a dick move right there, and you can't deny that.
Posted by: George at October 15, 2009 12:01 PM

In defense of Mr. Costello, the incident you mentioned took place in a hotel bar. He was being harrassed and intimidated by raging alcoholics Steven Stills and Bonnie Bramlett, who were defaming the British music scene and everyone in it, tossing insult after insult. Finally, in his own fit of drunken pique, Costello fired off the single most insulting thing he could think to say and paid the price.
Mr. Costello THEN went on television, to the major music publications and radio stations, where he apologized profusely and sincerely to anyone and everyone and especially to Mr. Charles.
It took a very long time to live it down and make amends but he did acquit himself in the end.
I have never heard an honest apology from Mr. Gibson and Mr. Voight is simply an
complete and total whore for the right wing conservative movement.

That is all.

Posted by: Spender at October 15, 2009 2:41 PM

How is it obvious that Elvis Costello isn't a racist?
Posted by: Eep at October 15, 2009 2:40 PM

One close listen to his song "Night Rally" should do the trick, Eep.

Posted by: Spender at October 15, 2009 2:44 PM

I thought Night Rally was about fascism, not racism...

Anyway, my point isn't anything against Elvis Costello, it was that "obviously he's not racist" seemed like a strange statement. I think the list of things that someone can be "obviously not" is pretty short, and prejudiced is nowhere near that list. People have hidden love slaves in their backyards, you don't think that they can hide feelings about race in the backs of their minds?

Posted by: Eep at October 15, 2009 3:04 PM

Well, I was going to come back with "pretty much his entire musical output," but you did better, Spender; thanks.

Posted by: Jerce at October 15, 2009 3:05 PM

People have hidden love slaves in their backyards, you don't think that they can hide feelings about race in the backs of their minds?

Weak sauce, Eep, unless you seriously want to start a discussion about what celebrities are harboring "hidden" evil that we should want to boycott...because that would make us...moral?

Closer to topic: Current gossip has painted John Cusack, a hero to many of us here, as an arrogant and unpleasant douchebag. Should we turn up our noses at his artistic output because of his reputed personality? What about his sister Joan? Since she has not gone on the public record repudiating her brother's douchebagginess, should we punish her by not seeing her movies?

I finally saw Valkyrie this weekend and Tom Cruise was really, really good in it. I know Tom Cruise is bugshit crazy, but should that matter to me? Maybe it should, because by paying for Valkyrie in even the smallest way (Netflix subscription), am I not enriching Tom Cruise; and will he not use his riches to further the agenda of Scientology?

Is this like that "buying a dime bag gives money to Al Quaeda to buy bombs" PSA stuff from a few years ago?

Posted by: Jerce at October 15, 2009 3:14 PM

i 'll forgive every one for a good movie because Sean penn sucks as husband but he's a great actor or Josh Brolin sucks as husband but he's good in his 3 last movies or Michael Cera always acts the same character but i like his movies(no one is perfect?!)

Posted by: carrie at October 15, 2009 3:17 PM

I have a simple method to avoid being 'let down' by celebrity's:
I have very low expectations of their personal behavior.
Works for politicians too.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 15, 2009 3:22 PM

*Celebrities* Dammit!

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 15, 2009 3:24 PM

I'm not interested in which stars harbor hidden evil, or in pointing fingers at who's moral and who isn't. It just bothers me when people trust someone so much because of who they think they are (particularly one they don't even know personally) that they can say that person is obviously not ___________. That's been used for evil so many times (again, I'm not talking about Elvis Costello here, he probably isn't a racist by the modern understanding of the term, which is a whole other can of worms, I'm talking about the broader issue). You think the lower-level fascists have grand plans to oppress, or that they're completely ignorant of the evils their governments are doing? Of course not, but they forgive because they that's obviously not what the movement is really about.

Posted by: Eep at October 15, 2009 3:25 PM

No disrespect, intended, Eep and I do see your point. I do not know Mr. Costello on any level, other than his music and interviews and am basing my respect for him on those factors and on the basis of his good and charitable endeavors. Could I be completely wrong about the man? Certainly. Still, if I have opinions about a public figure, it is based on what I know and until they prove me wrong, I'll stand by those opinions.
"Night Rally" is a song about the British fascists but you likely know that they are as virulently anti-semitic and racist as any National Socialist entity in the good old U.S. of A.

Posted by: Spender at October 15, 2009 3:59 PM

ANOTHER movie remake of British mini-series?

I'm guessing that the movie won't hold a candle to the original, nor will Gibson be as good as Bob Peck.

:?

Posted by: JTL at October 15, 2009 4:28 PM

Mel Gibson's personal life is controversial. Really? That's so two years ago.

Before/During/After a DUI he made rude/racial/white guy remarks. Par for the course these days. He hasn't said anything a TeaBagger wouldn't be proud to scream in my grandma's face.

Rape is another story. Incestious relations with an adopted step daughter is a completely different story. I'm not really interested in paying to further those careers.

If we compare his actions to the bad behavior of today it looks like child's play. I mean - at least he isn't a politician coming out with great statements like 'I have a wide stance.'

Posted by: GinKirk at October 15, 2009 4:34 PM

The vast majority of musicians and actors live so far up their own ass you could punch them in the stomach and break their nose. I learned a long time ago that if you refused to partake in the art of people you disagree with you are going to be left with very few choices.

Refusing to patronize a Mel Gibson movie (or any actor) because you disagree with their views is disrespectful to everyone else involved in the project and quite honestly hurts innocent people.

As for this movie, it looks good. I like Martin Campbell, Ray Winstone, Danny Huston, and Gibson plays over-the-edge-obsessed-with-revenge pretty damn well. Looks solid to me.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 15, 2009 4:57 PM

I don't want to be misconstrued here. Inflamatory comments is one thing. Getting convicted of rape and then fleeing the country and then somehow fighting extradition is something else all together. Fuck Polanski.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 15, 2009 5:01 PM

Does Gibson have the right to spout antisemitic garbage and pose as a pious Catholic while cheating on his wife? Of course he does. Does that mean I'm going to give him any of my money or time? No way.

Posted by: legaleagle at October 15, 2009 6:10 PM

who were the ad-wizards who thought that arnold-like quip would be good for mel to say right there at the end - is that a letterman-style anti-strategy, a big-dick-swingin move, try and stop if you can - riggs is back

Posted by: furtherbeyond at October 15, 2009 6:39 PM

From the 1st comment...

"You know, Gibson's a really, really good actor. Do you think being mentally unbalanced helps with that?"

I absolutely think that helps. I bet if all the best actors were 'put on the couch', whatever, I think we'd find that Pacino, Deniro, Penn, etc were all slightly skewed as far as the mental balance equation is concerned.

I dont care one good goddamn about his views or his personal beliefs. I can divorce personal views from a movie or an album. I aint a damn socialist, but I love Rise Against. I'm no bleeding heart liberal, but I will watch Sean penn and Tim Robbins in whatever movie theyre in. So why should this be any different? I want to be entertained, and based on his track record, Mel will at least fucking entertain me, regardless.

And it'll be good to have him back, at the very least for nostalgias sake.

Posted by: Eric at October 15, 2009 11:25 PM

I like to think I can overlook someone's personal flaws. Orson Scott Card is my favourite author, despite the fact that he's a gargantuan prick. It's different with actors, where you actually have to see their faces (I couldn't read Ender's Game if there was a picture of Card on every page), but Mel Gibson seems just crazy enough to be the harmless kind of asshole.

Posted by: James at October 16, 2009 6:56 AM

See, here's the other thing, though... I don't know the majority of my favorite artists' (actors, directors, musicians, authors) personal beliefs or opinions about anything. For all I know, Nathan Fillion could be a raging homophobe. So should I stop watching anything he does because that *could* be the case? Most people on the planet probably have some kind of differing belief from me on how human beings should be treated with regard to race, ethnicity, creed, gender, or sexual orientation, or all of the above. Does that mean I should shun every single person I come into contact with because they might be a racist? Do you see where I'm going with this?

Mel Gibson, to my knowledge, has never murdered anyone because they were a Jew. He has shot his mouth off, and is clearly dumber than the average bear, but if I ignored anyone on Earth who's done that in their lifetime, I'd have a very solitary existence.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at October 16, 2009 11:17 AM

Sure, I'll give this one a shot when it comes out.

BTW, true story regarding Mel. Right after his little DWI misstep and roadside rant, I noticed a few people in my small town with "Mel Gibson For President" bumper stickers on their cars.

Too funny!

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 16, 2009 9:31 PM

I may or may not see this, mostly because of my memories of the original series, which was very good. I don't want to see the story ruined.
As for Mel, actors often say and do stupid shit. I don't let that stop me watching their work if it's any good. There are actors the mere sight of whose face always makes me stabby, Sean Penn for instance. I can't watch him. But that's nothing to do with his personal life.

Posted by: Tarn at October 19, 2009 11:56 AM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: