web
counter
 

Gyllenhaal Gets His Freak on with Portman; Maguire Goes Freak Sh*t

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (42)



Jake_Gyllenhaal.jpg

Here’s the trailer for Brothers, from director Jim Sheridan, responsible for one of the very best movies of the decade, the flawless and often overlooked In America, which can do permanent damage to your tear ducts. Brothers stars Tobey Maguire, as an Iraq War soldier who is presumed dead. While he’s MIA, his brother, Jake Gyllenhaal, does a little funny business with his funny parts on Maguire’s wife, played by Natalie Portman. But surprise! Maguire didn’t actually die; he just turned into a psychopath.

It’s a remake of the Danish film Brødre, but the whole love triangle has some serious parallels with Cider House Rules, where Maguire was in a similar position with Paul Rudd’s character, only reversed. And despite the overbearing Fray song in the trailer (aren’t they all?), it looks like a solid goddamn film, one that’s certainly a contender for end-of-the-year awards, which is damn near a given when Jim Sheridan is involved. The man can absolutely kill you with restraint. Plus, the best U2 song of all time. It’s still somewhat strange for me to see this trio in adult roles, though.









Doctor Who Movie to Be Announced at Comic-Con? | Stephen Dorff in a Blade Spin-Off













Comments

I couldn't watch all of In America. I'm sure it's brilliant but all the horrible things that happened were too much for me. Obviously I am far too sensitive, but I got to the bit with the air conditioner and gave up.

Posted by: Carrie at July 7, 2009 10:41 AM

I do want to see this one though. Tobey Maguire looks psycho. Bit of a change.

Posted by: Carrie at July 7, 2009 10:46 AM

Tobey Maguire looks about as far away from Spider-Man as you can get. It looks pretty damn good, and Natalie Portman is gorgeous, as usual.

Posted by: Snath at July 7, 2009 10:48 AM

This looks like one of those beautiful sad films that I can't get enough of. Plus, Maguire looks TERRIFYING.

When is it out?

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 7, 2009 10:50 AM

Is it weird that I can't see Natalie Portman around snow without thinking of her as Marty and not wanting anyone to lay a fucking hand on her?

Posted by: jM at July 7, 2009 10:53 AM

Seems that Tobey Maguire went Machinist for this role?

but the whole love triangle has some serious parallels with Cider House Rules

Then why did I immediately think it paralleled Pearl Harbor?
Because Michael Bay is a virus. A tiny-dicked virus.

Posted by: branded at July 7, 2009 10:57 AM

Tobey Maguire's dead eyes seem to be working in his favor for this film. I like the guy just fine, but he has a bit of a blankness to him that isn't well suited for some roles.

I can totally buy him as a psychopath though.

Bad trailer, but I think it'll be a good film. Just say no to The Fray.

Posted by: Melissa at July 7, 2009 10:57 AM

Seriously, NO-ONE does realistic children on film like Jim Sheridan. He just nails that mixture of childishness mixed with a few fleeting moments of adult perceptiveness. He never lets it stray into the "wise beyond their years" cliche.

Nice shout-out for "Bad", truly the best piece of drumming ever!

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 7, 2009 10:57 AM

Hey way to tell the entire story in the trailer, guys.

Posted by: Paul Southworth at July 7, 2009 10:59 AM

jM:

Agreed, especially the scene when she's skating outdoors: eerie parallel there.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 7, 2009 10:59 AM

Jim Sheridan also directed Get Rich Or Die Trying. Portman is a marginally more compelling actor than 50 Cent though. Marginally.

Posted by: TSF at July 7, 2009 11:13 AM

WHY ARE THEY MAKING A TEN THINGS I HATE ABOUT YOU SHOW!

And TSF, from the Saturday Night Live skit I learned that Natalie Portman is not only a better actor, but also a better rapper than 50 cent. Maybe they should remake Get Rich Or Die Tryin' with a "harder, more realistic feel" and have Natalie Portman be the up and coming rapper who gets shot repeatedly, but survives to befriend a burnt out rapper well past his prime, going on to a life of whoring herself out to advertising companies and getting torn apart in the rap feuds that get started by people calling her out for being a media whore.

Or she should just get nekkid again, or fund remakes of the last 3 star wars movies where George "excelsior" Lucas isn't allowed to do anything but sit in the corner and play with Jar Jar Binks and Hayden Christenson action figures while making the "b-b-b-b-b-b" noise like you did when you played with trucks when you were 6.

Posted by: Braski at July 7, 2009 11:35 AM

This looks like one of those beautiful sad films that I can't get enough of. Plus, Maguire looks TERRIFYING.

When is it out?

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 7, 2009 10:50 AM


Exactly, I love the heartbreak, I'm glad I'm not a sick puppy afterall - or at least not the only one ;)

Still though, it wouldn't kill people to try and learn the art of trailermaking again. I blame the birth of the teaser trailer, I mean seriously isn't the point of every trailer to be a teaser? Why make a distinction?

Ah whatever - Jake Gyllenhaal is HOT, hence I will see this movie!

Posted by: Mona at July 7, 2009 11:43 AM

And the old lady says, "Ooh, look! Mare Winningham is in this!"

Seriously. I love Jake and Natalie, but I love Mare and Sam.

Posted by: Louise at July 7, 2009 11:44 AM

Wow. That made absolutely no sense. I think I need another cup of coffee.

Posted by: Louise at July 7, 2009 11:45 AM

This looks really powerful. Reminds me of Snow Angels (which haunted me for DAYS). I'm really glad to see these three in adult roles--I think they are ready for it (well in their 20s/30s) and yep already smelling award nominations. Wonder who it will be--Jake or Toby for the Oscar?

Posted by: grace b at July 7, 2009 11:47 AM

i typically abhor portman and macguire, but that trailer wasn't so bad. nat still makes me wanna gag, but toby look solid. i think it's what melissa mentioned-his dead eyes working for him instead of against him this time. i really do wish they'd stop giving away every last f'n detail in trailers tho. jake actually looks pretty hot for once too. interesting premise overall. will probably wait to rent it tho. as a side note-u2's best song, in my opinion, is 'all i want is you' off of rattle & hum.

Posted by: gem at July 7, 2009 11:53 AM

Hate to be a spoilsport, but I got to see what looked like a pretty final cut of this film a few months ago and it was TERRIBLE. Unless they've re-edited the hell out of it, it's gonna be a hot mess. It's a shame, 'cause the actors are all pretty good in the movie.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at July 7, 2009 11:57 AM

The trailer lost me when it skipped from sad sack into psycho smash territory. Did anyone else get the feeling they were watching the trailers for two different films spliced together? The first movie I'd see. The second one, not so much.

Posted by: Kolby at July 7, 2009 12:01 PM

This movie looks terrifying and intriguing... like most things in my life which means I'll probably love it for making me feel something but hate what I'm actually feeling.

Posted by: soto at July 7, 2009 12:18 PM

i'm so confused. why is emo-spidey so skinny and angry????

cannot wrap brain around these folks being parents/soldiers/grownups with real emotions.

Posted by: JenVegas at July 7, 2009 12:26 PM

Am I the only one who's seen Brødre? This looks like they've replicated many of the scenes almost exactly. The cast is eerily similar, too. Why bother with a remake? (I guess because I'm the only one who's seen Brødre.)

Also, yeah, the trailer TOTALLY tells the whole story! That's ridiculous.

Ugh... I can't tell if I was in a bad mood before seeing this or if it put me in one. THANKS, PAJIBA. THANKS A LOT. *rassafrassin' website...*

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at July 7, 2009 12:28 PM

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at July 7, 2009 12:28 PM

Didn't you know? Americans are stupid, and we only like American movies with American actors. We hate foreign films. They frighten and confuse us.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 7, 2009 12:42 PM

Jake Gyllenhaal and Tobey Maguire, right, on some level I kinda feel sorry for white women, I now know why some of them seek out black men.

Posted by: Guess Who! at July 7, 2009 12:43 PM

Nice to see Tobey Maguire working again. Very "machinist"look! i don't remember his last time i saw him in a movie(may be a funny trailer with RDJ)

Nice to see Jake Gyllenhaal .I don't remember the last time i saw him in a movie exception in "Persia"photo (when is it out? is it finished?)

Not nice to see Nathalie Portman because she may be charming but she looks so childish even her daughter looks older!

Posted by: caro at July 7, 2009 12:43 PM

Natalie Portman has a daughter? I do not concur.

Posted by: Snath at July 7, 2009 1:48 PM

Anna, I guess you're right. I guess I wonder from a creative standpoint why a director would re-make a film so similar to one already there (and not that old)?

I am not opposed to re-makes in different cultural contexts (The Magnificent Seven and Seven Samurai were both plenty good) so why not adapt the story instead of just re-shooting it with English-speaking, quasi-identical actors? Why would a director want to do that? The easy paycheck?

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at July 7, 2009 1:58 PM

Kolby - that's a pretty accurate description of my reaction too.

Posted by: tamatha at July 7, 2009 2:39 PM

Then why did I immediately think it paralleled Pearl Harbor?

I concur. Didn't even have to watch the trailer to get that thought in my head.

Of the trailer though. I thought it was going strong up until the point of the psycho shit. Why is it that they always seem to have to portray soldiers with PTSD? Not everyone who comes back comes back with messed up heads. I have plenty of friends who come back unchanged and the same amount who come back different.

So really, why couldn't they have just done a film that involved the love triangle, and left out the crazy shit?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 7, 2009 2:49 PM

Why couldn't they just have done a film that involved crazy shit, and left out the love triangle? Just go all-out crazy. Like Weeds.

Posted by: Angus at July 7, 2009 3:07 PM

Even better idea.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 7, 2009 3:55 PM

but the whole love triangle has some serious parallels with Cider House Rules

Then why did I immediately think it paralleled Pearl Harbor?
Because Michael Bay is a virus. A tiny-dicked virus.

Posted by: branded at July 7, 2009 10:57 AM


GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!

Posted by: blacksred at July 7, 2009 4:56 PM

Wandering Parakeet, you are not alone!

Brode is one of my favourite films, and I am alternately intrigued and revolted at the idea of a Jake Gyllenhaal, Natalie Portman and Tobey Maguire remake.

And I echo your comment - it looks like a shot-for-shot remake. The pancake scene, the shot of the helicopter... it looks the same, only way, WAY more trite.

Posted by: jay at July 7, 2009 6:06 PM

Think I will just watch Brødre again instead of this.

Posted by: silchas ruin at July 7, 2009 6:38 PM

I was also thinking that she looks too young to have kids that age. In earth years, she is. In Hollywood, hmm.

That dinner table scene, in which mother's desires are spouted? No. No kid that age would believably say that. No, it should be some impossibly glamourous, quick-witted bon viveur who glistens gin and tonic while launching into a chorus themed as 'Live! Live! Live!'

Hushed longings, why can't can they re-up my heart?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at July 7, 2009 7:11 PM

Jo Mama, kids really WILL say the most insane things. Especially if they get the hang that what they've overheard is secret/important. My nephew told me yesterday that, "My mommy is cut off of her credit cards and she yelled and threw a dish. Also, she says you gained weight."

He's four. My six year old son also likes to remind adult men not to pay so much attention to their penises if they are shifting around a lot. It's just a helpful thing to know.

Posted by: replica at July 7, 2009 10:23 PM

This film was remade with the blessing of Brodre's scriptwriter, Bier, because
she felt that while people were into the family dynamic, they didn't really relate to the war angle as Denmark has like 15 soldiers in Afghanistan.

So the film is a remake that tries to approach the story from a different angle.

The film was not only re-edited, but other scenes had been shot regarding Toby Maguire's character.

I've never been big into Maguire, and In America could be a little too much for
me. But I like Sheridan overall, he's great with actual actors, and Portman and Gyllenaal are pretty reliable. If it gets solid reviews I'll probably see it in a
theater, otherwise: Netflix.

Posted by: Samantha at July 8, 2009 12:44 AM

Tobey Maguire freaks my shit out. I'm pretty sure the dude has never blinked once in his life.

Posted by: PissBoy at July 8, 2009 7:30 AM

Bollocks, the trailer's been pulled...

Posted by: K at July 14, 2009 7:26 AM

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at July 7, 2009 12:28 PM
Am I the only one who's seen Brødre?

As Jay said, you're not the only one who thinks Brødre is excellent! I'm rather sad to see it being remade, especially since it appears to be almost exactly the same, except in English and probably a lot worse. There is also an American remake of Bier's Open Hearts in the works. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Hollywood won't butcher two spectacular films.

Posted by: Lena at July 20, 2009 8:55 PM

Having just seen the original film, I think out of many remakes out there, this one makes sense. I mean, a film where a young man sent to war is presumed dead and his wife has to deal both with her 'loss' but life after him. So when he returns, conflict arises. It has the potential to be very powerful.
Still, the trailer gives away a lot of the film, and direct scenes from the original seem to be pulled very much so. I hope the director sticks with the wife as the main character because unlike many of these war films, she is truly the character who the story revolves around. And Anne von Beaverplatz, if sad dramas suit you, this one is at the top of the pile. The second half will make you feel so somber and compelled. It's fantastic filmmaking, the original one, let's hope for a second shot of beauty.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at July 20, 2009 10:10 PM

I liked Brødre and compared to that, Tobey and Jake seem far too young, I suppose any age soldier can go missing, but they're definitely pretty young to have kids that age.
Why is it that they always seem to have to portray soldiers with PTSD?
The older brother was always the good capable one while his younger brother went to jail. Now their roles were reversed.

Possible spoilers, depending on how similar the films are:

The older brother was messed up as he was forced to kill a fellow soldier. Guilt made him deny it so they thought he might still be alive and his wife and baby son were waiting and hoping he'd come home. The guilt was eating him up.
Also in Brødre, there was no affair between the younger brother and the wife, the trailer was totally misleading. The film was about the older brother coming to terms with what he had done.

Posted by: ChrisD at July 23, 2009 12:11 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time