web
counter
 

Lady, What You Don't Know About Jack Abramoff Is Enough to Fill a Warehouse

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trailers | Comments (12)



bagman-trailer.jpg

I had the opportunity last month to see Alex Gibney’s Jack Abramoff documentary Casino Jack and the United States of Money. I’ll be honest with you, too: I didn’t review that documentary largely because I didn’t follow it particularly well. Jack Abramoff was a terrible motherfucking sleaze, and he was involved in so much evil that it all blurred together incoherently. I don’t blame Alex Gibney for the muddled nature of Casino Jack — he was simply trying to be complete and, in doing so and without providing a simple enough narrative structure, the documentary got bogged down in too much minutia, minutia of which I had a difficulty understanding. The Abramoff scandals were a lot more involved and, really, entrenched into the government structure than I think many of us might believe. He screwed over a lot of people and he pulled more government strings than you’d imagine was possible from one man. The casino scandal was just one of many — he pitted Native American casinos against each other and against the government and profited wildly in doing so — it was just the easier one to understand (the work he did with Tom DeLay to encourage sex shops and sweat shops and compel women to have abortions in the Northern Mariana Islands was a lot more sinister, but harder to understand (and, in the end, harder to prove)).

Most of us are generally leery of Hollywood depictions of reality, but in the case of Abramoff, I actually think — in order to begin to grasp the situation — we need a simple, black and white Hollywood narrative, a movie with a sharper focus that will highlight the lobbying conspiracy in terms most of us can more easily grasp and understand. I have no doubt that George Hickenlooper’s Bagman will take plenty of liberties, both dramatic and structural. But to fully understand what happened, we need an accessible entry point. I’m hoping that Bagman will provide it.

And no one does sleazy business man type better than Kevin Spacey (well, no one except Michael Douglas). Here’s the trailer for Bagman (formerly Casino Jack).










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



News: Rumors Abound About X-Men: First Class Cast | Trailer: Mortal Kombat Promo Reel | Michael Jai White In The Unthinkable









Comments

Will Lovitz be ACTING?!

Posted by: mswas at June 9, 2010 11:31 AM

I love it when Spacey goes Sleazy. I think it's what he does best, however much he wants to be (and now look like) Jack Lemmon.
As for Lovitz, I really hope he does it right.
There's a couple shots there where I see the SNL, but then some where he looks good. My fingers are crossed for this movie. It does look good.

Posted by: Odnon. at June 9, 2010 2:29 PM

And for the record, I just bought the rights to "Spacey goes Sleazy", the story of an ex-surfer caught up in the naked madcap hijinks of the corporate underworld.

Posted by: Odnon. at June 9, 2010 2:32 PM

I read John Lithgow for some reason.

Jon Lovitz doesn't as a dramatic actor doesn't make sense in my head.

Posted by: ChristianH at June 9, 2010 2:34 PM

This is the only time I've every had iMDB fail on me - there's no listing for this movie, nor do the listed stars have Bagman listed as completed & awaiting release.

PS - I'm always happy to see Graham Greene get a bit of work.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at June 9, 2010 4:00 PM

If you wanna see Lovitz showcasing his dramatic chops I suggest you take a look at Southland Tales. He's got 'em.
This one looks like a winner, I loves me some sleazy Spacey.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 9, 2010 5:08 PM

How weird is it to see Lovitz get third billing in a flick like this? Does Dana Carvey have a supporting role?

Posted by: stryker1121 at June 9, 2010 9:24 PM

@Idio--IMDB has the film listed as 'Casino Jack,' which explains why you couldn't find it as 'Bagman.'

Posted by: stryker1121 at June 9, 2010 9:29 PM

Oh, the same song from Wall Street 2? How original!

But hey, Kevin Spacey and Barry Pepper!

Posted by: Franzibald at June 9, 2010 11:43 PM

Yay! I love Spacey! And Lovitz! Can't wait!

Posted by: Chickaboom at June 10, 2010 12:10 PM

Looks promising, but, for fuck's sake, stop recycling the Stones for auto-emote factor.

Both of these songs are ridiculously overused in film in general.

Posted by: Recondite at June 10, 2010 7:30 PM

This particular actually solved my dilemma, thank you!

Posted by: Nollen at January 23, 2011 1:41 PM