web
counter
 

Another Damn Hollywood Sequel?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (23)



zzz.jpg

It’s not official, and at this point it’s merely in the discussion stages, but I think we’re familiar enough with the machinations of Hollywood to predict the inevitable: A Zombieland sequel. Will there be one? Well, of course. Even if it wasn’t one of the most badass movies of the year, Zombieland recouped its production budget in its first weekend, and we can all smell sequel. And it smells like glorious, rotting flesh (and maybe a leaky boob, if the first movie was any indication).

In fact, one of the writers of Zombieland (who has left two comments on this site applauding our readership, as it should be) essentially suggested, in a tweet today, that he’d like to do a sequel, but the second weekend’s gross will probably determine whether it gets made: “Zombieland must do well again this wknd to merit a sequel. I feel like I’m on a reality show where America decides.” And given that the only wide opener this weekend is Couples Retreat, I think it’s safe to say that Zombieland should not only have another strong weekend (to be on the safe side, we recommend you go see it again).

In the meantime, the movie itself does leave plenty of room for a sequel (that won’t require any Crank: High Voltage absurdities to get it going), and Paul Wernick — the other writer of the movie — told MTV that he’s already brimming with ideas:

“We would love it, and everyone involved creatively wants to do another one,” Paul Wernick told MTV News before the film’s release. “Woody came up to us after the final cut of the last scene and gave us a hug and said, ‘I’ve never wanted to do a sequel in the previous movies I’ve done until this one.’ ”

In addition to Harrelson, Wernick and co-screenwriter Rhett Reese said the returning core crew would include Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin and first-time director Ruben Fleischer. If and when another film gets the green light, the writers have more than enough material with which to work.

I suspect they do. There’s not shortage of zombies to kill, and let’s be honest: At 81 minutes, Zombieland hardly quenched anybody’s thirst for ridiculously awesome zombie kills.

However, a word of caution — this statement might be taking it a little too far:

“We would love to do several sequels,” Wernick said. “We would love to also see it on television. It would make a wonderful TV series.”

A TV series? Ummm. No. Let’s leave well enough alone, why don’t we?









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 10/05/09 | Dave Letterman's Affairs Monologue









Comments

I dunno.

I feel that if there's ever a genre that doesn't require sequels, it would be the zombie genre. Anything after the fact just feels like a gas station burger after a delicious steak.

Or perhaps I just fear change.

Posted by: Schlegel at October 5, 2009 8:16 PM

As one who is now extremely familiar with leaking boobs I can attest that they smell nothing like rotting flesh. As far as a sequal, yes please. As long as it's as good or better than the first. Otherwise, just let me alone with my Zombiewood. TV? Bitch, yuo crazy.

I'll be seeing it again on the weekend.

Posted by: admin at October 5, 2009 8:29 PM

So, I'm the only person who didn't get to see Zombieland over the weekend? Shite.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at October 5, 2009 8:33 PM

I dunno. A series might be really good - look at "Walking Dead" (the comic series). The creator specifically stated that he wanted to explore what happens after the initial adjustment to the zombiepocalypse that is the usual subject of most zombie flicks. In, you know, an ongoing format - the lives of these characters keep on going, and so the question comes up, what do they DO? Of course, in the case of a Zombieland series, we'd hardly be seeing deep psychological exploration - rather, it'd be weird humor and awesome kills. I'm okay with that, strangely.

Posted by: Landon at October 5, 2009 8:35 PM

The UK release is on 7th so keep your damn leaking boob talk and whatever other cute/repulsive tid bits from the film to yourselves until Thursday, gatdamnit.

Posted by: TSF at October 5, 2009 8:36 PM

They should do a sequel but only have Woody, we don't need anyone else. Ok, Woody and Emma. I have spoken and my word is LAW.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at October 5, 2009 8:36 PM

As noted, I'll be seeing it tomorrow night, as my bestest zombie-lovin' friend was out of town this weekend. So our dollars have yet to be counted.

Posted by: MM at October 5, 2009 8:36 PM

So, I'm the only person who didn't get to see Zombieland over the weekend? Shite.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at October 5, 2009 8:36 PM

Don't worry, these guys could easily pull an Army of Darkness with this. They have talent, and there are no shortage of directions for this thing to go. Hell, they could do a great comic series with this.

I wish them the best of luck, and I hope the sequel tops the original.

Posted by: George at October 5, 2009 8:38 PM

Why in the shitting crotch did my post pop up twice on here? Three minutes apart?!?

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at October 5, 2009 8:58 PM

I'm all for a sequel if they don't spend the first 20-25 minutes really milking the rule-card gimmick again. You can't even begin to understand how close I was to walking out of the film when it felt like the gimmick wasn't going to evolve at all. I packed up my pens and review notebook and started looking for the least disruptive path through the crowded theater this morning. God bless Abigail Breslin, for it was her performance alone that compelled me to stay. Then the film made good on all the hype and I forgave it for being more trick-filled than your average reality dating show cast.

You can only laugh at the cartoon villain slipping on a banana peel so many times, if you catch my drift. Zombieland exhausted that banana supply ten minutes in and kept throwing the plastic grocery bags and shipping material for at the screen for the rest of the first act. Is the American film-going public so stupid they need that much repetition to get something a little off-beat in a film? I sure hope not.

Posted by: Robert at October 5, 2009 8:59 PM

Apparently it was originally pitched as a TV series and adapted into a film for budget reasons. So a TV version could potentially work, if that's how the writers originally envisioned it.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at October 5, 2009 10:54 PM

Pinky is a WITCH!


burn the witch, burn the witch...

Posted by: gp at October 6, 2009 12:21 AM

Please forgive the ignorance on display, here, but...
Do "they" only look at weekend numbers?
What about the Mon-Fri in-between weekends?
(five whole days-worth when some people plunk-down the same amount of real cash-money as they would on the weekends to "go to the movies" [no, really -- it happens! I are one of those people, since I work 12(+)-hour shifts over the weekend])
Or does the revenue from those days get tacked-on to the proceeding weekend?
(FFS, I feel stupid for asking the question... maybe I shouldn't cli-

Posted by: Rykker at October 6, 2009 12:32 AM

-ck on the butt- Awwfuck.

Posted by: Rykker at October 6, 2009 12:34 AM

And here in the Antipodes (that's Australia, bitches) we have to wait until fucking December 3 for Zombieland to even show in cinemas.

I consider this cruel and unusual punishment. It'll be out on gorram DVD in the US before then!

Posted by: trib at October 6, 2009 1:46 AM

I could see how the rules would give way to a specific story in a tv series. And the movie didn't have over-the-top FX, meaning it could be made.

That said, I'm all down for a sequel. I'd take more Woody kicking butt.

Posted by: Fredo at October 6, 2009 2:16 AM

There's already going to be a zombie-themed television show soon. A&E has signed Robert Kirkman and Frank Darabont to develop Kirkman's Walking Dead comic series into a TV show. So, you know, we got that goin' for us.

Posted by: ASterisk at October 6, 2009 8:46 AM

Anybody know where I can find a breathalyzer for my keyboard?
(like the kind that DUI convictees sometimes get installed on their cars as part of their sentence)

Posted by: Rykker at October 6, 2009 10:00 AM

Pinky, you're not the only one... I was sick all week and through the weekend, so I haven't seen it yet either! You can bet your ass I'll be hauling mine to that theater this weekend, though!

Posted by: Anna "Switchblade" von Beaverplatz at October 6, 2009 10:37 AM

Hold on there a sec, DR. A ZOMBIE show. I don't jive with all of the zombie love. I mean, I do if the conversation ever veers to End Of Times, this is Texas for John H. Cusack, but almost all of the books and movies are disappointing.

A Zombie tv show in the style of Twilight Zone would kick the fucking shit off the air. Maybe 2 or 3 ep arcs at the most. Also, it goes without saying that this show would need to be outside the realm of network. Zombieland, for instance, delivered on the goop towards the start, but would not have been as enjoyable for its drama. How can the climax in an action comedy feel like descending action? I can think of a cliche or two, but it wasn't like Jesse Eisenberg had the Zombie cure coursing through his veins and the leader of Pacific Playland was some evil Re-Animator type with Kim Jong-Il, Charlize Theron, and Dirk Nowitzki among his menagerie. Like a deranged human collector with the power and aspirations to take advantage of a zombie apocalypse. Still totally open for the sequel to get at the cause or any number of evils that would arise in a desolate, caro syrup and red dye #40 soaked world.

Sorry, got sidetracked.

Make a tv series. Get a DP or director that knows how to shoot action, dammit! High Speed Slo Mo is trick, not a style.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at October 6, 2009 11:06 AM

Doesn't matter good how a film is, doesn't matter that there are, just occasionally, good sequels, when you encourage sequels, you become one of them, you know, the wankers who think the public are idiots.

Posted by: Donalb at October 6, 2009 2:20 PM

Called it.

Posted by: ChristianH at October 6, 2009 3:16 PM