web
counter
 

Watch Wolverine For Free

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (42)



Reynoldsdeadpool.jpg

I don’t know why certain other movie bloggers are making a big deal out of reporting this, but if it’s in the trade papers already, what the hell harm is there in passing along information that X-Men Origins: Wolverine was leaked online last night? It’s apparently an early cut - it has a temporary score, and a darker appearance than the final cut. But I’m guessing that Hugh Jackman looks about the same, which is to say: Shirtless, angry, and hairy.

According to Variety:

Fox execs first heard about the breach at about 7 p.m. last night and began assessing the damage. A Fox source said the leaked version is an early rough cut, with temporary sound and music and a darker appearance than the finished footage.

Fox said they will pursue the breach as aggressively as possible with the help of the MPAA, FBI and local law enforcement.

In the wake of the leak (and anybody with half a brain and a high-speed internet connection can download it right now), apparently 20th Century Fox has decided to “recalibrate the narrative,” so reports Cinematical’s William Goss (huzzah!):

“Look,” said CEO Tom Rothman in a prepared statement, “[expletive] those weaselly little mother[expletive]ers that couldn’t hold onto their [expletive]ing horses to see this film and pay to do so. This is our way of sticking it to the so-called ‘fans’ who managed to show up for three of these flicks and purported to be willing to show up for this one, even thought the last one was a total piece of [expletive].”

James McTeigue was then hired to shoot the literal murder of the man responsible for leaking the film late last night, Guy Finch, at the hands of a firing squad. Franchise veteran Brett Ratner has just wrapped filming the film’s third portion, in which Rothman and Hood take turns actually sodomizing real-life bloggers and message board trolls who were caught downloading the film. (The last known Tweet of one Snikt683 read as follows: “4 am, time for another Hot Pock— omg who’s knockin, OMG! ITS OSCAR HOST WOLVERINE! Dude, what the F, stop shoving me, running out of char-“)

Poor Guy Finch. And I’d have posted this earlier, but the sodomy really put a dent in my productivity.

Anyway, that first part is true. It’s been leaked, but don’t download it. That would be wrong. You’d be taking money out of 20th Century Fox’s pocket. And, honestly, wouldn’t you rather see Ryan Reynolds’ Deadpool on the HUGE screen. He’s much more defined that way.









Musical Tourism | C Me Dance Trailer













Comments

I'm confused... What does "[expletive]" mean?

Posted by: Skitz at April 1, 2009 4:49 PM

Oh, shut the fuck up, Skitz.

Posted by: I Love Beets at April 1, 2009 4:53 PM

Hahaha! That is exactly what I thought when I read the title. Why would I download a crappy version when I can see RR and Taylor Kitsch on the big screen? All. That. Muscle. Definition.

Poor Snikt683, hairy Wolverine Oscar host is the last thing I'd want to see when sitting down to eat a yummy hot pocket.

Posted by: rayliota at April 1, 2009 4:54 PM

All of this ink over the Wolverine workprint makes me think they wanted this to leak so everyone could see the "rough" version, then listen to the online bitching (for once) and "recalibrate" the film. Why? Because they want the Watchmen crowd back, and they'll do ANYTHING to win them over.

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at April 1, 2009 4:55 PM

"Yummy hot pocket"? I'm sorry? Did you mean molten hot on the edges with a glacial center?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 1, 2009 4:57 PM

I'm sorry, my internet bandwidth is far to precious to be consumed with the downloading of an unfinished version.

Posted by: adminalinadingdong at April 1, 2009 4:58 PM

Seriously, I'll download it illegally when its a finished version. I mean...uh... I'll go pay good money to watch what will surely be shit in my local theater. Yeah.

Posted by: the_wakeful at April 1, 2009 5:02 PM

I'm with Doctor Controversy on this one. Fox is going to try to un-fuck this movie. And fail in doing so.

As for me....I might add it to my Netflix cue. It will be entertaining, but not $10 worth of entertaining.

Posted by: stardust savant at April 1, 2009 5:04 PM

Flush pockeeeeetttt!!

Posted by: annoyingmouse at April 1, 2009 5:06 PM

I'm really hungry and a Hot Pocket sounds good. Too good. Actually, what you have to do it just put it in a bowl and let the thing explode in the microwave. That way it will be thoroughly heated and it won't stick to the paper plate.

If this theory is true, then Fox is in a whole lot of trouble. The 'fix' should have come when the script was written, not after a rough cut was put together. I'll still watch it though on the big screen.

Posted by: rayliota at April 1, 2009 5:13 PM

Online, theater, it's still a bloated prequel to a disappointing comic book movie (which was a sequel), which has already become obsolete after the genre hit a new zenith with The Dark Knight, and Iron Man. Who could possibly give a shit about this thing other than girls who want to see Jackman shirtless, again?

Posted by: George at April 1, 2009 5:15 PM

Agreed, rayliota. I paid full price to see the third movie, what the hell else can they do to me? I mean, really?

Can Logan die of AIDs?

Posted by: annoyingmouse at April 1, 2009 5:19 PM

Because it's a summer blockbuster and I am inexplicably drawn to summer blockbusters. I love going to the movies, buying a giant soda, fighting back the crowds for a good seat, and settling in for complete and utter inanity. Then, upon leaving the theatre, I find the cool yet comfortable summer night air refreshing and pleasing. Summertime and movies brings me back to my youth, to being excited over something. I need to leave the cynicism behind and I find that being cynical about movies such as this is a complete waste of time. If not, I'd probably be beating my skull in daily.

Posted by: rayliota at April 1, 2009 5:23 PM

hahaha, exactly annoyingmouse.

Posted by: rayliota at April 1, 2009 5:25 PM

I have a Dr. Cox level of hatred for Hugh Jackman . I have never seen him in anything remotley entertaining .

Posted by: gilp at April 1, 2009 5:25 PM

I swear this is my last comment. gilp, Australia was absolutely without a doubt the most hysterical thing I've seen in awhile.

Posted by: rayliota at April 1, 2009 5:30 PM

George, let's not overlook the girls who want to see Ryan Reynolds look all hot.
We're important too!

Posted by: JenVegas at April 1, 2009 5:32 PM

It doesn't matter, we all know how much this film will blow, but we'll see it anyway because we like going to the movies. Besides, maybe it won't be as bad as I expect (I expect Fantastic 4 bad).

Posted by: George at April 1, 2009 5:34 PM

Jesus Christ, how does Ryan Reynolds fit acting into his busy schedule of living at the gym?

Posted by: Eep at April 1, 2009 5:43 PM

I think I tend to agree with Doctor Controversy; it seems like a purposeful leak in order to garner feedback.

I love the writeup of the incident, though. [expletive] weasels, indeed.

Posted by: totally not Anna von Beaverplatz at all at April 1, 2009 6:07 PM

Man, this movie looks bad. Like, Tomb Raider bad.

If the leaker came to my door with the final print and offered to pay me to watch I probably still wouldn't.

Posted by: jon29 at April 1, 2009 6:12 PM

My mama just called me and told me that she's making a Hot Pocket for lunch. I cracked up at her and now she thinks I'm crazy (er).
Today is Talk About My Parents Day.

Posted by: Blonde Savant at April 1, 2009 6:14 PM

If I see this movie, it will be at the drive-in. Ryan Reynold's abs will be fucking gigantic on that screen. Plus, I'll be in my car so I can, uh, enjoy the gratuitous man bodies to the fullest extent. (That's totally on-topic, right?)

Posted by: Dangle McGee at April 1, 2009 6:41 PM

Shirtless, angry, and hairy.

SOLD. I really wonder why Hugh Jackman only works for me when he's all hairy and unkempt as Wolverine. It's the same thing with Viggo Mortensen: only works when he's dirty and hairy as Aragorn.

This looks awful, but I will definitely download give FOX my money for it.

Posted by: Phiggy at April 1, 2009 7:37 PM

I for one am shocked, SHOCKED that illegal downloading is being condoned in this establishment.

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2009 7:38 PM

I saw the workprint last night. I realize it wasn't quite finished but it was the worst movie I have seen in a long time. It had a lot of talent involved and they all blew donkey balls. Every single character gets destroyed. I don't think there is any possible way to salvage Ryan Reynold's character for a Deadpool flick. Horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE. There is so much random crap and tons of characters that so up for five minutes and return twenty minutes later for another couple seconds.

They tried so hard to fit so much shit that all it could be was utter retarded feces. Will.I.am is a character!! FUCKING AWFUL. I can't wait to see it reviewed here. It is so hilariously bad the review writes itself.

Posted by: c at April 1, 2009 7:54 PM

/Rant=On
/On Point About the Biz=On

Pardon my density, but haven't several franchises found ways to work with fan communities, all things digital and blah, blah, blah?

They're interested, so feed them. I know my LotR DVD sets (All of them. The extra-turgid, endlessly detailed versions.) are just about worn out. Ditto for my Firefly & Serenity. And it took me years to hunt down DVDs of Brooks' adaptation of Mahabharata (Developed from Buck's translation). And the tabletop book about that project. And a couple bios. And I have followed the cast from project to project because they are so good.

Embrace the rabid fans. Because they'll invest way more than one movie ticket. Put up a web site. Feed them content. Didn't BSG just do this brilliantly? Isn't there a column on this very site about the accidental prototype for a fan-feeding franchise in TV and movies - Star Trek. This isn't news, people!(!)(!!!)

Piracy only happens when someone who wants something can't get it more easily through legitimate channels. All the effort expended to do piracy? Convert that to dollars. All the effort expended to “fight” piracy? Apply that to increasing availability and driving down the price. The freaking Grateful Dead freaking made room at their performances for the "bootleg" recorders. The freaking Grateful Dead and their drug-addled, hippie-dippie followers are better capitalists, and patrons of the arts than all the MBAs & big name donors doing the other thing.

Most of us have figured out that big-budget productions take big budgets. We get it. We'll pay. Our investment in what we like is huge. We'd invest more in if the idiots in charge will just let us. We want to patronize the things we enjoy. We hate it when an artist, group, creator or franchise we connect with goes away, and we know that money is the sincerest form of flattery. (Apologies to Heinlein.) We're a tens-of-thousands army of ten-dollars-at-a-time patrons of the arts. Different from nickles and dimes extracted from the one true variation the "owners" are willing to emit to the world, enforced with great cost and decreasing effectiveness by ever more draconian arrays of storm troopers and questionable technology, how about making it easy (or possible) for us would-be patrons to get what we want and pay up? I'll buy literally everything from artists I appreciate. I think of paying for the occasional dud really just supporting a career I appreciate.

Let's see. Co-opt the rabid fans, of genre, of particular artists, of cheesecake, of all three. (Joan Severance as Addison Carter's mind implant in Max Headroom - that's a trifecta of yummie.) Or pay extra (sunk) money to enforcement that pisses off your customers and is doomed to fail.

Hmmmmmmmmmm. Which, to do. What to do.

Boneheads.

/On Point About the Biz=Off
/Rant=Off

And while I understand all the ab / pec / studliness anticipation, will this Woolverine have boobies?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at April 1, 2009 7:58 PM

Really? No one else noticed "Deal with your consciousness"?

Posted by: Mimi at April 1, 2009 9:23 PM

Really? No one else noticed "Deal with your consciousness"?

I noticed. I thought it was deliberate. As in, deal with the fact that you'll still be conscious after you watch it, no matter how much you pray for the sweet release of oblivion.

I'll still pay full price for the promise of hairy, angry, shirtless Wolverine, and I don't want to hear a peep about it. After a couple of thousand years of misogyny, it's my turn to objectify.

Posted by: marya at April 1, 2009 11:16 PM

Watched it. First 30 minutes = A+. Last 75 minutes = C-. Ending = Big fat fucking F.

Posted by: I Love Beets at April 2, 2009 9:34 AM

I will confess (I live abroad, dear NSA) to downloading (sometimes). But I also buy anything I like.

Here's my point:

With 'Burn after Reading' I NEEDED to see it. I'ts a Coen, thats all there is to say about it.
NEED!
So I *checks over shoulder* downloaded a "good cam".
And I didn't like the shitty copy the internet served my eyes.
It Sucked..

(Wait, all you Coen lovers, there is a point..)

Then me Girl wanted to see it in the theatre, and offcourse I tagged along.

I loved it. Laughed my behind off. Thought it was really funny.

So here's my point:
You will never see the quality of a movie from an unfinshed workprint/Cam or any of that stuff. For me the suspension of disbelieve is just tottaly gone. Out of the window.
So how Fox or rabbid-fandogs can evaluate the quality of a movie from a bad copy is beyond me.

I'll see this one when it comes out in Amsterdam.

Posted by: Magiel at April 2, 2009 10:25 AM

Yeah I noticed the "consciousness" I just thought the usual suspects would pick up on it earlier. They usually do, guess the picture of Reynolds distracted them. It happens.

Posted by: Four Eyes at April 2, 2009 10:48 AM

"Deal with your consciousness"? WTF does that mean?

"Conscience," perhaps?

Posted by: Meanwhile at April 2, 2009 12:19 PM

Actually I have watched the workprint and it was pretty damn good, a few effects here and there missing but overall it seemed to be complete. And the quality was great. I didn't download it myself but wasn't about to say no when the chance arose to watch it over a few beers with some friends. And as for my conscience.....it enjoyed it as well. So in other words what I'm saying is, fuck the motion picture industry, they will make millions on this flick no matter what, if they wanna cry themselves to sleep on their money stuffed pillows over this then so be it.

Posted by: Dchaos666 at April 2, 2009 1:34 PM

Look at that picture. Look at how awesome Deadpool is in comic form. Dressed like a ninja, armed to the teeth, not cross-eyed...

Fuck you, Ryan Reynolds. Fuck you and your pube beard.

Posted by: dave at April 2, 2009 2:50 PM

I saw the working print and it was awful. No character development, incomprehensible plot, etc...
By the way, the other members of Weapon X, other than Sabretooth, spend no more than 10 minutes on screen.

Posted by: roland at April 2, 2009 3:04 PM

Can we get an unofficial review of this thing? I'd rather have a ruptured appendix than watch X-Men 3 again, so let us know if Wolverine is just as bad.

Posted by: Lucas at April 2, 2009 10:06 PM

Even without all the FX in place, it was still pretty bad.

Had you been able to see all of Cyclops' beams, you would have been dazzled for a split second longer than you were without them before going back to thinking "wow, this blows."

Posted by: Mick J at April 2, 2009 10:09 PM

Don't worry Dave, you'll get over it eventually. We all eventually get over SOME aspect of our life being irreparably damaged in some way. Think of all the remakes...yes think of them all.

But yeah, Deadpool looks awesome. Makes me tear up a little when I think of how this movie is just proobably going to ruin more of the Marvel universe. Damn.

Posted by: Four Eyes at April 2, 2009 10:32 PM

Eh. I am SUCH a forgiving loser - I'll wait and give it a chance. I like Wolverine, and I pretty much have slavered over the chance to see my heroes walk since I was a fourteen year-old 'hottest chick at the Con/Only chick at the Con' (um...before they started hiring boobies, that is). I am prepared to grant some leeway still. If they provide a few dreams-made-real, well, I'll take it.

Funny thing, I just saw Watchmen last night and I was, for once, prepared to tear it a new one if they blew it. I studied up again and all. And I LOVED it wholeheartedly. I thought they made very wise decisions in what they changed, and very brave decisions in what they kept in stone. I also enjoyed getting to see the characters actually 'move'...an element that the novel lacked somewhat in providing some 'kick ass factor' to balance the rhetoric. I know, wrong thread...but...I got to have hope. Watchmen restored my faith in the possibility.*

*not that I think this will be any good. Sadly.

Posted by: replica at April 3, 2009 3:21 AM

Any news regarding this movie has a picture of Ryan Reynolds attached. I realize that Dustin probably locks everyone in their respective mother's basements when anything Wolverine-related pops up, but can't you guys stage a coup, throw him down, chain him to the heater and get a pic of Hugh Jackman up? Or Taylor Kitsch? Or Liev Schreiber? Pretty please?
IMDB search confirms I spelled Sabretooth's name right. Go me.

Posted by: Irina at April 3, 2009 7:30 AM

I never thought I'd say this but after the three other movies, 90 minutes of Hugh Jackman shirtless, screaming with rage/agony, flexing his muscles, with multiple shots of him whipping out his bladz got. old. really. fast. Can we cut his time in half and replace it with Gambit (who after all that press is in it for maybe 10 min) doing card tricks? I'm not even asking them to improve the plot, IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK FOX?

Posted by: i don't know at April 3, 2009 10:31 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time