web
counter
 

Now Raping Your Grandpa's Childhood

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (26)



flyingMonkey.jpg

Frank L. Baum’s Oz novels haven’t been under copyright for quite some time and it’s been over seven decades since the release of The Wizard of Oz, so it’s probably less surprising that two versions of a remake are in development than it is that there hasn’t been one yet.

There’s been one version attached to Todd McFarlane of Spawn and Getting Sued by Neil Gaiman fame for several years, which reportedly has a script ready by Josh Olson, who also wrote the screenplay for A History of Violence. It isn’t a reboot so much as a sequel, with Dorothy’s granddaughter going to Oz and battling evil. So it’s like Buffy with flying monkeys.

But a second version has been slowly grinding through preliminary development hell for the last year, with a script written by Darren Lemke, one of several writers of Shrek Forever After. Temple Hill, the company behind the Twilight films, is producing this version. So it’s got those three strikes against it. Maybe they can land Kristen Stewart as Dorothy!

The Los Angeles Times (a paper that’s printed, how quaint!) is reporting that Warner Pictures is looking at both takes and trying undoubtedly to imagine which has the best chance of replacing the Hogwarts gravy train.

Of course, there’s also the film adaptation of Wicked that Universal has been working on for the last year, which throws a third potential adaptation in the mix. Poor old Baum’s been resting easy for decades and now you have to take a number just to get in line to bugger his corpse. Here’s hoping that whichever remake makes it through the gauntlet actually goes back to the source material, because Baum’s novels? Fairly fucked up and terrifying for children’s novels.









Blog Trends from My Bunk 03/10/10 | Robert De Niro in Vince Lombardi Biopic













Comments

Warner Pictures is looking at both takes and trying undoubtedly to imagine which has the best chance of replacing the Hogwarts gravy train.

As if there's really any question. The company behind that which may not be spoken? I think we've found a winner, Or loser as the case may be.

Posted by: admin at March 11, 2010 9:09 AM

I don't think poor Frank Baum has been resting easily since SciFi (I refuse to acknowledge the bastardation they use now!) foisted "Tin Man" on an unsuspecting public.

I just want to know, when is the Tim Burton/Johnny Depp version coming out?

Posted by: Uncle JR at March 11, 2010 9:11 AM

A Wicked movie would be interesting...to see if they went with the novel or the play. The novel is fairly fucked up, with some very unfamily-friendly aspects.

If they cast Kristen Stewart as Dorothy or any relative thereof, I am going to finish repairs on the MurderVan and load up as many of y'all as can fit, and we're gonna go misbehave.

Posted by: dammitjanet at March 11, 2010 9:15 AM

Speaking of re-makes, what ever happened to the Bonny and Clyde re-make with Hilary Duff as Bonny? I was really looking forward to that one.

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 11, 2010 9:39 AM

My fiance just saw Wicked (a play) and came home raving about it. I can get behind a movie adaptation of that.

Posted by: superasente at March 11, 2010 9:40 AM

No one will ever take this seriously. I maintain that it is a joke.

Posted by: Cindy at March 11, 2010 9:43 AM

Well, somebody wrote a sequel to "Gone With the Wind" and there was a big to-do about it at the time, and now people still remember "GWTW" and I'm probably the only one who remembers "Scarlett" even existed, but even I don't remember if it was made into a movie.

Quality endures.

Shit stinks, but only for a brief time. Then it turns to dirt.

Posted by: , at March 11, 2010 10:12 AM

Oh, comma, I have a vague memory of that atrocity, but it took me years to convince myself that it never happened. I won't even speak the name of the "book." (It was made into a miniseries. Guh.)

Posted by: Nicole at March 11, 2010 10:31 AM

Rolling over in his grave.

Posted by: Mick J at March 11, 2010 10:41 AM

I just want to know, when is the Tim Burton/Johnny Depp version coming out?

I had the exact same thought. No childhood classic is safe from the Burton/Depp machine.

Posted by: stardust at March 11, 2010 10:54 AM

the film adaptation of Wicked - SQUEE!

I can't decide if I wouold rather see an adaptation of the book or the musical. Oh, who am I kidding, I would rim Schwartz for a shot at Galinda.

:: hums Popular ::

Posted by: Patty O'Green at March 11, 2010 10:57 AM

Return to Oz and Tin Man were both excellent films so fuck the alternative take haters... (Especially as Return to Oz was actually a pretty accurate version of the 3rd book in the series Ozma of Oz)

Posted by: Adam C at March 11, 2010 11:05 AM

Ain't nothing wrong with a new Wizard of Oz. I fully endorse these projects and wish them safe and speedy journey through the studio system. It's not like the Judy Garland version was that faithful to the original novel, nor is there a dirth of material to adapt from. Please: there are 15 books written by Baum and countless further progressions into Oz by approved and unapproved of torch bearers. The first book's not even the good one. Give me the mangaboos--vegetable people--of Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz anyday. Now that's a story with some meat to it. I'll also settle for Jack Pumpkinhead and the living sawhorse of The Marvelous Land of Oz.

Posted by: Robert at March 11, 2010 11:26 AM

Oh, I love Jack Pumpkinhead. I need to go get these books. Half Price, here I come.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at March 11, 2010 11:32 AM

Someone really needs to stop Todd McFarlane. Preferably with a large truck.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at March 11, 2010 11:50 AM

dammitjanet: I'm pretty sure they're going for the musical with Wicked. I didn't really like the book so much but love the music for the show and it could be really good? I just want them to cast Chenoweth.

And...honestly I'm not so against the idea of someone revisiting Oz, and going all-out with the visuals. I mean, let's be honest, the original was groundbreaking btu the painted backgrounds can only take you so far.

comma , Scarlett was an ABOMINATION. Actually, there's a new sequel called Rhett Butler's People that isn't so bad. Not perfect, but pretty good. Maybe this sequel could go the good way?

Posted by: figgy at March 11, 2010 12:05 PM

Figgy, don't speak of it!

Posted by: Nicole at March 11, 2010 12:24 PM

I'm fine with the idea of a sequel involving a granddaughter and such. I'm also ok with a movie adaptation of Wicked.
I just worry that if a "new" Wizard of Oz movie is filmed, it'll replace that great classic for children...like Willy Wonka did.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at March 11, 2010 12:28 PM

You shut your whorish mouth, Whorish Mouth! That garbage remake of Willy Wonka replaces NOTHING except the fecal-smeared door handles of a Port-o-Shitter!

Sorry, I went a little TURKEY DAMN BUTT HELL ASS back there... my bad.

God, please bless me with children who love reading and exhibit good sense and taste.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at March 11, 2010 2:35 PM

Eerily appropriate... my kids watched Wizard of Oz last night for the first time.

Hand to God, when Dorothy was running home to beat the tornado, my daughter asked why she didn't call her aunt (on her cell phone) and tell her to pick her up.

So, my question of the day is:

Should remakes be updated or just regurgitated re-takes of existing films?

Posted by: courtney at March 11, 2010 2:54 PM

Is it too much to ask to get a quaint, true-to-the-books version that features an actual little girl with short blonde hair? Yes, probably so.

Posted by: Average Jane at March 11, 2010 6:21 PM

Sure,I worship JUDY as much as any self respecting man..but give me Baum's terrifying,fun,radically feminist Oz. Something like "Return to Oz" but with tons of violence and action and feminist politics would be more faithful than MGM's film.

Posted by: Case at March 11, 2010 8:18 PM

I sure hope robert downey is one of em!

Posted by: logan at March 12, 2010 12:18 AM

logan, your suggestion is acceptable to me. I will watch just about anything that my secret husband, RDJ, chooses to do.

Patty, "Popular" is my favorite number to sing in the car. If you lived in SoCal, I would invite you to go sing songs from the musical at this noraebang (that's what we Koreans call karaoke) in Fountain Valley. I'll even let you be Galinda (the "guh" is silent).

Hey, and do you read The Pioneer Woman, too? I love her.

And that comment needs to be in next week's EE. HILARIOUS.

Posted by: Jelinas at March 12, 2010 6:24 AM

I ACTUALLY appeared to be happy to discover this web-site. I want to thanks for your time for this excellent learn!! I absolutely taking advantage of each little bit of it and I had you saved as a favorite to check out fresh items you text.

Posted by: Linken at January 23, 2011 1:41 PM

I don't even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you aren't already ;) Cheers!

Posted by: Cayden at February 16, 2011 3:47 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time