web
counter
 

Why Androids Drink Electric Sheep: Blade Runner Remake

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (29)



bladerunner_harrison_ford.jpg

It’s said, possibly apocryphally (which is a fancy way of saying that it’s a clever lie about the past), that when William Gibson saw Blade Runner in the theater, he left halfway through and had a nervous breakdown in the street because the images he saw on the screen were the same as the ones he was seeing in his head while writing the half-finished Neuromancer. Somehow I doubt that he’d have the same reaction to whatever comes out the recent rumors of a remake/reboot/TV series/game show/tentacle fest that is currently in the works for Blade Runner.

Alcon Entertainment is in final talks to acquire the “film, television and ancillary franchise rights to produce prequels and sequels.” That doesn’t sound terrible at face value, it really doesn’t sound like anything. What does Alcon have to say?

“This is a major acquisition for our company, and a personal favorite film for both of us. We recognize the responsibility we have to do justice to the memory of the original with any prequel or sequel we produce. We have long-term goals for the franchise, and are exploring multiplatform concepts, not just limiting ourselves to one medium.”

Oh yeah, speak marketing to me, baby. But we can’t completely hold that against them, I mean that’s just how marketing people talk, it’s a genetic thing. So let’s start digging until we are completely unsatisfied.

First, the producers of the resultant film are going to be Andrew Kosove, Broderick Johnson, and Cynthia Sikes Yorkin. We’ll get to the first two in a second (they own Alcon Entertainment). Know why Cynthia Sikes Yorkin is producing? Well the guy who is trying to sell the film rights is Bud Yorkin. Cynthia Sikes Yorkin is his former Miss Kansas wife who is 28 years his junior and has been producer on exactly one film: a late nineties television movie called “Sins of Silence,” that was a rape drama starring Ms. Yorkin and Holly Marie Combs. TK will be reviewing it imminently I’m sure.

Don’t cry yet, it gets better! Want to know all of the great films that Alcon Entertainment (and Andrew Kosove and Broderick Johnson) has been responsible for? Here’s the complete list!

1. Joyful Noise (2012)
2. Dolphin Tale (2011)
3. The Apparition (2011)
4. Late Bloomer (2011)
5. Something Borrowed (2011)
6. Lottery Ticket (2010/I)
7. The Book of Eli (2010)
8. The Blind Side (2009)
9. The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2 (2008)
10. One Missed Call (2008)
11. P.S. I Love You (2007)
12. The Wicker Man (2006)
13. 16 Blocks (2006)
14. The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants (2005)
15. Racing Stripes (2005)
16. Chasing Liberty (2004)
17. Love Don’t Cost a Thing (2003)
18. Insomnia (2002/I)
19. The Affair of the Necklace (2001)
20. Dude, Where’s My Car? (2000)
21. My Dog Skip (2000)
22. Dude Cam (2000)
23. Lost & Found (1999)

That’s right! Blade Runner will be brought to you by the same brilliant producers who gifted the world with The Wicker Man and The Blind Side, and 21 other films so mediocre that I can’t remember enough about them to bother hating them. I just hope that Nicolas Cage is available to play the role of Deckard.

In case you’re wondering, I’ve already checked, and the answers for why this is happening to us do not exist at the bottom of the bottle.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Dark Knight Rises Rumors Go Round And Round: Catwomen And Ninjas | Superman's Mom Will Be Way Hotter Than Lois Lane: Diane Lane Cast As Martha Kent









Comments

In case you’re wondering, I’ve already checked, and the answers for why this is happening to us do not exist at the bottom of the bottle.

Maybe you checked the wrong bottle. Let me help you with the research.

Posted by: twig at March 3, 2011 10:11 AM

I apologize for this being unrelated, but since this is a SLW piece and geek-related, I thought I would pass along that:

George RR Martin just announced (on his site) that "A Dance With Dragons" will be released on July 12, 2001.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at March 3, 2011 10:15 AM

Maybe it hit me at just the right age, but I enjoy Dude Where's My Car. Incredibly stupid, but all the side cast members are fun. Zoltan (makes Z shape with hands).

Posted by: benjiep at March 3, 2011 10:16 AM

Maybe you checked the wrong bottle. Let me help you with the research.

Posted by: twig at March 3, 2011 10:11 AM

------------

Ditto. Because whywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhydearlordWHY? is a very long and fundamental question that needs a fucking answer.

I will not digress from this quest until I find the answer, or die trying. Or die killing those guys.

Waitaminute, those guys produced Insomnia? I find that a bit odd.

Posted by: zeke the pig at March 3, 2011 10:16 AM

Sorry, Forbiddendonut, but I've gotten to the point where the book has to actually be in my hands before I'll believe a release date, even from him.

Posted by: Todd at March 3, 2011 10:42 AM

George RR Martin just announced (on his site) that "A Dance With Dragons" will be released on July 12, 2001.

Your 2001 typo made me twitch. Also.. holy hell, it comes at last. I couldn't be more excited (actually I could, but not by much). I'm gonna have to reread the entirety of this monster series. I've forgotten too much.

I’ve already checked, and the answers for why this is happening to us do not exist at the bottom of the bottle.

I'm gonna double check for ya, just to be sure.


Posted by: elgarcon at March 3, 2011 10:45 AM

Insomnia is definitely the one diamong amongst the rough. And I'm not sure you can say that Gibson tale is necessarily apocryphal since it seems to have originated from his own blog.

What gets me is, while Blade Runner isn't a "perfect" adaptation of the book, it's the best one possible and is a damn near perfect film. Why even try to mess with that? There are plenty of untouched Dick books (teehee!) that are ripe for adaptation. The Man in the High Castle should be Sam Rockwell's final, big break out role.

But probably not if it were produced by these schmoes.

Posted by: RobP at March 3, 2011 10:49 AM

16 Blocks was pretty ok, and Insomnia was good.

Posted by: Bucko at March 3, 2011 10:50 AM

Wait. The title says remake but the press release says prequel and/or sequel. So which is it? If they wanna make shitty prequels and sequels I can cheerfully ignore them but a remake of a PERFECTLY GOOD MOVIE REALLY PISSES ME OFF!

Posted by: logan at March 3, 2011 10:53 AM

No! No! NO NO NO NO NO No! No! NOO! NO! No! NO! NO! Yes? NO! NOOO! OH GOD NO! NUU! NEIN! NYET! NON! Nde! Nee! Nedda! Lo! Nahin! Nne! Ne-keh! Neen! Mecheye! Nej! Yuk! Na! Haai ngeko! NO!


Posted by: LEROOOY at March 3, 2011 10:53 AM

Lo did Godtopus gaze down upon the sinful in their woods of holly. Lament did He for their wickedness and spite and their defecation of his blessed medium. His fury did he summon with a righteous rage to hurl upon those foetid soulless whom then decried the justness of their production, but their lies did not taint the ears of His Legion.

The skies did darken as His minions did gather. And the faithful did visit upon the lands of holly His most benevolent of judgments. The earth did tremble as The Tanks of Murder unleashed their terrible wrath of fetapult and machined guns. The moral did rejoice in the sounds of bones being ground to powder under the tank's angelic treads whilst they imbibed at the bar of whiskey. Virtuous flames did flow forth from the marauding ark and they did land upon the sides of the wicked faces and Rutger Hauer did preach upon the damned. And the land of the screen silver did beg for the mercy of Him and His followers but it was naught to be given as millions paid price for their transgressions.

Rains of taco dip did fall from Heaven to quench the cleansing fires of truth so that the just may be spared fate. And the faithful did gather to the boards of word-making clad in naught but their own glorious nudity to celebrate liberation from pictures most repugnant. Nachos most macho were to be enjoyed by the scrupulous though none could conceive of what lay beneath the cheesy mound. And He did look upon this gathering of the virtuous he did smile upon them whist baptizing His legion in His magnificent ink as His Blessed. And they did thank him.

Posted by: admin at March 3, 2011 10:56 AM

^^^
I'm taking the rest of the day off.

Posted by: , at March 3, 2011 11:04 AM

TK will be reviewing it imminently I’m sure.

[grits teeth]

Shut.

The fuck.

Up

Posted by: TK at March 3, 2011 11:17 AM

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKK
*head explodes*

Posted by: the bees knees at March 3, 2011 12:50 PM

I might have a nervous breakdown at my desk. It's my favorite movie. I may never get over this.

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at March 3, 2011 1:13 PM

Yeah, there's a few titles in that list that are o.k. movies, even if there are several more awful ones. If they get the right creative people involved and give them enough control, the production company alone doesn't seem like the deathblow to the project's quality.

That's not my concern as much as this: the strengths of Blade Runner are its atmosphere and its philosophy. Those are what make it a transcendent film. I'm not against sequels, prequels, or remakes, but in this particular case it seems like an especially tough act to follow. Expanding the universe will necessarily result in a focus on more plot-driven elements, which will inevitably pale in comparison to the poetry of the original film. And if that's not the point of going further with Blade Runner, I have even worse news: you're not going to improve upon Rutger Hauer's "tears in rain" speech.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at March 3, 2011 1:32 PM

I have even worse news: you're not going to improve upon Rutger Hauer's "tears in rain" speech.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at March 3, 2011 1:32 PM

That's not really fair. Nothing can ever improve 'pon that.

Posted by: RobP at March 3, 2011 3:15 PM

Jesus F. Christ.

*walks off, shaking head*

Posted by: SB at March 3, 2011 3:36 PM

Dudes, it's not worth getting excited about.

The license terms specifically preclude remaking Blade Runner, so the headline here is misleading (Steven Lloyd Wilson should know better).

Posted by: Justin Halliday at March 3, 2011 9:28 PM

You can all go screw yourselves. Dude Cam was magnificent.

Posted by: Johnnyboy at March 3, 2011 9:33 PM

Let me put this as simply as I can to the potential producers, directors, and actors involved with any remake prequel or sequel of Blade Runner. I have access to firearms a great deal of ammunition and the skill to use them. You have been warned.

Posted by: clancys_daddy at March 3, 2011 9:41 PM

Maybe you checked the wrong bottle. Let me help you with the research.

Posted by: twig at March 3, 2011 10:11 AM

------------

Ditto. Because whywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhydearlordWHY? is a very long and fundamental question that needs a fucking answer.

I will not digress from this quest until I find the answer, or die trying. Or die killing those guys.

Waitaminute, those guys produced Insomnia? I find that a bit odd.

Posted by: cosplay costumes at March 3, 2011 10:48 PM

Imagine a world children, before the internet with its wikipedia and movie database, before the dvd with its select a scene feature...
I know rough times. And there was a mother who made a statement, a bold statement, one afternoon to her unforgiving son and in front of her impressionable younger daughter... This woman stated something like "Blade Runner? Isn't that the movie that Mel Gibson was in, and they spun his character off onto all those Mad Max movies?" And I was dumbfounded, I mean and her son was dumbfounded. There were minutes of just blinking, mouth hanging open ready to refute this claim, and right before I, I mean he could she said, "I know I read that somewhere, and how he got his start in it, then went back to Australia to do the Mad Max films." (remember this is before there was an message board thread for her to read this "fact" on, it would have been a legitimate publication. And since this didn't happen there was no literature spouting this willynilly)
I should point out that in my household when one makes a statement of this kind it is our duty to correct this mistake with proof. Nowadays with the internet this can be done in minutes. This was an incredible chore, and my sister and I never let her forget this statement. To this day I know that she has never seen Blade Runner, any time that I HAVE seen it I spent most of that time looking for Mel Gibson or anyone who looks like him that could have been confused for him. Regardless of the fact that even if he was in the movie, his character would have nothing in common with MadfuckingMax!

Posted by: protoformX at March 4, 2011 3:14 AM

Imagine a world children, before the internet with its wikipedia and movie database, before the dvd with its select a scene feature...
I know rough times. And there was a mother who made a statement, a bold statement, one afternoon to her unforgiving son and in front of her impressionable younger daughter... This woman stated something like "Blade Runner? Isn't that the movie that Mel Gibson was in, and they spun his character off onto all those Mad Max movies?" And I was dumbfounded, I mean and her son was dumbfounded. There were minutes of just blinking, mouth hanging open ready to refute this claim, and right before I, I mean he could she said, "I know I read that somewhere, and how he got his start in it, then went back to Australia to do the Mad Max films." (remember this is before there was an message board thread for her to read this "fact" on, it would have been a legitimate publication. And since this didn't happen there was no literature spouting this willynilly)
I should point out that in my household when one makes a statement of this kind it is our duty to correct this mistake with proof. Nowadays with the internet this can be done in minutes. This was an incredible chore, and my sister and I never let her forget this statement. To this day I know that she has never seen Blade Runner, any time that I HAVE seen it I spent most of that time looking for Mel Gibson or anyone who looks like him that could have been confused for him. Regardless of the fact that even if he was in the movie, his character would have nothing in common with MadfuckingMax!

Posted by: protoformX at March 4, 2011 3:19 AM

Imagine a world children, before the internet with its wikipedia and movie database, before the dvd with its select a scene feature...
I know rough times. And there was a mother who made a statement, a bold statement, one afternoon to her unforgiving son and in front of her impressionable younger daughter... This woman stated something like "Blade Runner? Isn't that the movie that Mel Gibson was in, and they spun his character off onto all those Mad Max movies?" And I was dumbfounded, I mean and her son was dumbfounded. There were minutes of just blinking, mouth hanging open ready to refute this claim, and right before I, I mean he could she said, "I know I read that somewhere, and how he got his start in it, then went back to Australia to do the Mad Max films." (remember this is before there was an message board thread for her to read this "fact" on, it would have been a legitimate publication. And since this didn't happen there was no literature spouting this willynilly)
I should point out that in my household when one makes a statement of this kind it is our duty to correct this mistake with proof. Nowadays with the internet this can be done in minutes. This was an incredible chore, and my sister and I never let her forget this statement. To this day I know that she has never seen Blade Runner, any time that I HAVE seen it I spent most of that time looking for Mel Gibson or anyone who looks like him that could have been confused for him. Regardless of the fact that even if he was in the movie, his character would have nothing in common with MadfuckingMax!

Posted by: protoformX at March 4, 2011 3:39 AM

Between the Blade Runner and the A Dance with Dragons news, I can't decide if I should be crying or whooping with joy.

Seriously: How moronic must one become to remake Blade Runner?

Posted by: FabMax at March 4, 2011 8:00 AM

I dunno, I can see how one might confuse the titles Blade Runner and Road Warrior. I used to get Kurt Russel and Michael Douglas mixed up. I was also nine.

Posted by: RobP at March 4, 2011 10:29 AM

I think a good remake of Blade Runner is possible. Let me rephrase that. I think a good adaptation of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep that doesn't just retread Blade Runner is possible. The book and film are so different that a whole other movie could be made from that book. Buster Friendly? The Empathy Box? The, uh... Electric Sheep? There's so much philosophically and emotionally that's going on in the book that the film missed. Which is not to besmirch the film. I wouldn't change a frame of it (the Final Cut, that is), and I think it may even be a better movie than DADOES was a book. But I reiterate, a good, not-redundant movie could still be made from that book, with the right creative team.

Of course, these guys aren't doing a remake, they're doing sequels/prequels to the MOVIE Blade Runner. There is almost nothing to add in that department. Deckard's backstory is inessential at best and mythos-ruining at worst, and honestly, where could the plot go after the movie ends? It's a cliffhanger, sure, but the possibilities are: they're replicants, so they die soon, or they're not replicants, so they live happily ever after. And even if they were doing a re-adaptation, their pedigree does not promise quality (Insomnia notwithstanding).

Posted by: Robin at March 6, 2011 4:16 AM

Studying other people's writings and solutions towards the nagging questions all of us have is a superb method to discover coping techniques and methods that function.

Posted by: Russell Rittenour at March 23, 2011 7:57 PM