free counter with statistics Who Knows What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Pajiba? | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

theshadow.jpg


Who Knows What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Pajiba?

The Pajiba Trade Round-Up / Pajiba Staff

Trade News | December 13, 2006 | Comments (57)


Item #1: With the passing of Peter Boyle, it’s important to remember that in addition to giving us the “Puttin’ on the Ritz” sequence from Young Frankenstein — which is funny every time — the man also starred in some genuine crapfests, and I don’t just mean Kickboxer 2: The Road Back. Back in 1994, in that heady post-Jurassic Park era when anything was possible, Boyle had a costarring role in The Shadow, the most unintentionally hilarious Alec Baldwin flick since the playful romp that was Malice. Apparently, 12 years was enough to wash the stench of failure from the brand: It’s been announced that Columbia has picked up rights to the crimefighter for a movie to be produced by Sam Raimi. For those who don’t know, the Shadow has the power to “cloud men’s minds,” which would seem to be a little redundant for a superhero who both wears a scarf across his face and also undergoes some kind of weird facial transformation; I guess nothing sends criminals running quicker than aquiline features. Enjoy that final repose, Clyde Bruckman. You’d spin in your grave if you could see things now. — Daniel Carlson

Item #2: Man, I love me some Tom Perrotta. And it’s not just because we used to share the same barber. (What can I say? We both love $14 haircuts.) No, dude knows how to write a story without letting his prose get in the way, which is one of the reasons I think that the two films (Little Children and Election) adapted from his novels have been so critically successful: His books do not rely on virtuoso feats of language, as do the works of Eggers, Foster Wallace, or Zadie Smith — fantastic writers whose novels will nonetheless never make a successful transition to the screen because of their reliance on the author’s voice (see, e.g., Running with Scissors). Perrotta’s language, on the other hand, is exceedingly normal (think Tobias Wolfe), and there is just enough there to tell a punchy, absorbing story about typical people in ordinary circumstances, which lends itself easily to the big-screen transition. All of which is why Warner Pictures is already making a movie based on Perrotta’s next novel, which isn’t even due for release until next fall. The Abstinence Teacher, which will be directed by the husband-wife team behind Little Miss Sunshine, will follow a divorced sex-education teacher in small-town Middle America, who must fight off conservative groups who want to deny children their right to sex ed. The woman, however, eventually falls in love with a Bible-thumping, born-again soccer coach. Consider me stoked. — Dustin Rowles

Item #3: Finally. After years spent languishing in the light comedy arena with 25th Hour and Inside Man, Spike Lee has decided to turn his directorial eye toward a fresh topic: race relations in modern America. Sure, he explored the topic briefly with, well, everything he’s ever done, but I get the sense that all that was a warm-up for his recently announced project: L.A. Riots, about the spring of 1992, when Los Angeles loosened its already tenuous grasp on reality and tried to eat itself, just like the Midwest had been praying would happen since the late ’60s. Lee will direct a script from John Ridley, who wrote the amazing Three Kings and the deeply lamentable Undercover Brother. So look for the film to be an intense, unflinching look at the emotional toil of the riots, mixed with Eddie Griffin mugging for the camera and making puns about Denise Richards’ ass. I smell an Oscar. — DC

Item #4: In light of my burgeoning understanding of feminism and its role (or lack thereof) in “chick flicks,” along comes Happiness Sold Separately, a chick flick based on a chick-lit novel, featuring Julia Roberts in the lead role. The story, initially, seems fairly simple: A 40ish woman, unable to conceive, withdraws into a world of isolation and laundry and later realizes that her husband is cheating on her with his nutritionist. Instead of going all Alex Forrest or even War of the Roses on her man, the catch here is that this 40ish woman decides that she wants to win her husband back. Makeovers, self-help books, ice cream, guilt, and a Pussycat Dolls cover of “I Am Woman,” follow, all meant to imply that if a woman would just cut her hair short, put on some goddamn makeup, and stop obsessing over motherhood, maybe she could hang on to her man, who is so obviously a victim of the 40ish woman’s neglect. The man, however, is reluctant to return to his wife, because he’s torn between his love of the new and improved 40ish woman (who now looks 35!) and his mistress’ 10-year-old son, who is cute and precocious and probably played by another in an endless supply of factory-produced Culkin kids. And holy shit, if Happiness Sold Separately doesn’t sound like it’s capable of setting the feminist movement all the way back to the ’50s. To which I say: Fuck you, Julia Roberts. It’s amazing that you found a film that manages to be nearly as offensive as Pretty Woman, a movie that taught us all that if you become a brooding white man’s Hooker Barbie, he’s bound to crawl up a building for you. — Dustin Rowles

Item #5: Picture Johnny Carson, dressed as Karnak, holding an envelope up to his turban-enshrouded head. Hear him, in your mind’s ear, saying “the biggest steaming pile of shit ever to be thrust upon us.” Slowly he opens the envelope, as Ed McMahon sits next to him in wild anticipation, ready to let loose with one of his trademark guffaws. Only that laugh never comes. Instead, Karnak reads the following off of the paper he withdraws from his envelope: “What do you call the new animated show being set up by Comedy Central, focusing on Larry the Cable Guy and being written by the men who foisted Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties upon us?” If you haven’t had an aneurism yet, you can visualize the only plausible outcome to this mental play: Stunned silence sweeps across the “Tonight Show” audience, only pierced minutes later when McMahon pulls out a gun and takes his own life, muttering something about the death of all that is good in the world, while Carson crawls on his hands and knees to the bandstand, weeping all the way, and pleads for Doc Severinsen to bludgeon him to death.

… I don’t even have a way to process this information yet, but I, too, am looking for a brass player to repeatedly bash my noggin. — Seth Freilich

Item #6: The box-office round up for the weekend reveals that the whole goddamn country has gone straight to the abyss of hell, as Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto scored first position, with $15 million worth of proceeds now heading toward the Holocaust Denial Anti-Semitic Fund. Happy Feet finally fell to number two, while The Holiday landed in the number three position, clearing a somewhat respectable $13 million. Based on the winsome coupling of Jack Black and Kate Winslet in the film, however, hundreds of police reports were filed over the weekend, as borderline obese men with zero in the looks department attempted to approach beautiful women in bars and win their affection by scatting. Good times. Blood Diamond kind of stunk it up, registering around $8.5 million; Zales stock, however, shot through the roof, as they quickly realized that not even Leo DiCaprio could affect their stranglehold on artificial supply and demand. Finally, Unaccompanied Minors pretty much fell flat, coming up short of $6 million.

What do we have this weekend? Ah, yeah — Will Smith in The Pursuit of Happyness, y’all. Good movie or bad, the man makes me mushy. I’ve seen the trailer no less than 367 times, but that scene in the bathroom still gets me all wet around the eyes. Eragon also opens, hoping — I presume — to create this generation’s The Neverending Story. Wait a sec; this is that movie based on the novels of Christopher Paolini, who wrote Eragon when he was 16, right? Nice. I love films that make me feel like a failure in life. Also on tap this weekend: Charlotte’s Web, featuring the voice work of Julia Roberts and Oprah Winfrey. Here, let me just save you the trouble: The spider bites it in the end. What else do we have? The Good German, yet another one of Clooney/Soderbergh’s vanity projects, which I swore for the longest time was based on a Graham Greene novel. Also, in very limited release, the Iraq war film Home of the Brave — featuring Sam Jackson, Jessica Biel, and 50 Cent — opens in three theaters. You might recall that Sam Jackson once turned down a role because he would’ve been cast alongside 50 Cent? And 50 Cent then called Jackson a crackhead? I guess they resolved their differences. — DR









Pajiba Love 12/13/06 | Pajiba Love 12/14/06


Comments

John Ridley wrote the ORIGINAL script for Three Kings... David O. Russell rewrote it to the point where it was almost unrecognizable from the original.

Posted by: S.K. at December 14, 2006 5:22 AM

I second the reaction to the bathroom scene of "POH."

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at December 14, 2006 7:51 AM

What's with the disappearing Round-up/Love posts? That's twice this week--or does that always happen and I'm just now having a moment of alertness?

No more handy link to that kinky "300" trailer? Sigh, I feel robbed.

Posted by: ranylt at December 14, 2006 7:55 AM

I like The Shadow, I watch it, as a comedy...


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAA


HAHAHAHAH HAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAA...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 14, 2006 9:40 AM

Damn you, Hollywood! Leave The Shadow alone! I love radio plays, love The Shadow, but that is definitely one show that is not easily adapted to a visual medium (as proven by the godawful movie with Baldwin).

Posted by: Lisa at December 14, 2006 9:54 AM

Uh, The 25th Hour and even Inside Man are not "light comedy". Especially The 25th hour. I don't remember laughing once. Seriously.

Posted by: gabrielle at December 14, 2006 10:50 AM

More Perotta = a good thing. I've been randomly wandering through his books, just finished The Wishbones, which was great. Good to see quality works getting adapted. And Undercover Brother, while awful, had some genuinely funny moments.

Two things about The Shadow: 1. Sam Raimi is a great director, when given the right material. 2. It would be a monumental task to make a Shadow movie WORSE than the last one. So we've got that going for us. Which is nice.

Eragon looks like they gave some Sci-Fi channel watching 14 year old a million dollars.

Oh... wait...

Posted by: TK at December 14, 2006 11:24 AM

psst - Gabrielle - it's a joke.

Shhh... don't tell anyone.

Posted by: TK at December 14, 2006 11:27 AM

Ahem. Gabby. That was sarcasm. It's a common rhetorical device used to mock or convey scorn. See also: Chandler Bing, Michael Bluth, or any of your friends you find always saying odd, not quite insulting things you never really comprehend.

Posted by: Anne at December 14, 2006 11:32 AM

That Julia Roberts movie is for real, eh? Get ready for some fabulous montages involving double-stick tape, botox and collagen injections, and the hilarity that ensues when you try to fit into a size 4 dress. Fucking lame.

Posted by: em at December 14, 2006 11:32 AM

gabrielle- clearly you don't understand sarcasm. don't worry- it's not for everyone.

Posted by: groangirl at December 14, 2006 11:34 AM

Can't agree with the Undercover Brother hate, it was worth the price just for Chapelle and the Doog man (or err..you know what I mean)alone. Best role Kattan is ever gonna have as well.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 14, 2006 11:47 AM

Oh God! I thought Julia had retired to raise the twins and protect them from the kids at school who will make endless fun of their names. Now, she's back with another piece of shit that Oprah will rave about. Does anyone else feel my pain of working with/living near multitudes of women who will flock to this film, love it, talk about how great it was ad nauseam and encourage me to "see it: you'll love it, it's really good" for the next 4 weeks. Why does Hollywood torture me in this way? The consistent output of crap has literally made me an outcast in my neighbourhood where apparently I'm the only person who wants to see something interesting for the price of a movie ticket.

Posted by: AmlissVess at December 14, 2006 12:20 PM

Seth, I have a trumpet that I will happily bludgeon you with. The only drawback is that I will then remain to be exposed to said Larry the Cable Guy cartoon.

Posted by: jbrader at December 14, 2006 12:20 PM

"The spider bites it in the end."

Crap! Thanks a lot, guys.

Posted by: Cody at December 14, 2006 12:26 PM

So why is it "Pursuit of Happyness"? Why the Y?

Posted by: Cheryl at December 14, 2006 12:27 PM

So why is it "Pursuit of Happyness"? Why the Y?

Posted by: Cheryl at December 14, 2006 12:28 PM

Ah, sorry for the double post. No need for a double answer; a single will do me just fine.

Posted by: Cheryl at December 14, 2006 12:29 PM

Malice kicked ass... Or did it suck ass? I can never remember.

Posted by: eric at December 14, 2006 12:31 PM

I still have a hard time believing that Julia Roberts is supposed to be some sort of desirable woman.

I nearly lost sight of her during the Polo scene of "Pretty Woman" amongst all the horses there.

One can only imagine what any spawn that had derived from her marriage to Lyle Lovett would have produced.

Posted by: UncleJR at December 14, 2006 12:38 PM

Thank you so much for referencing Clyde Bruckman! That's how I will always remember him...beware the auto-erotic asphyxiation.

Posted by: BLA at December 14, 2006 1:09 PM

I think Raimi already made a good Shadow adaptation. It was called Darkman.

To those who would point it out: That was a joke as well. I am fully aware that they are sepreate entities. I only used above line to illustrate that Raimi has pulled off similar material before, so I have no reason to doubt him now?

On Charlotte's Web: anybody besides me ever wonder why the townfolk were so impressed with a flipping pig when there was a SPIDER THAT COULD READ AND WRITE ENGLISH?!!!! Wouldn't that be more interesting than some future Jimmy Dean sausage?

Posted by: Vermillion at December 14, 2006 2:35 PM

Happiness Sold Separately? If it starred Joanna Kerns, was made in 1997 and aired on the Lifetime Network, I would be on that shit like white on rice.

But starring Julia Roberts in 2006 in mainstream cinema? To which I also say: Fuck hughhhh, Julia Roberts!

PS: You manly men types could use a female writer for this site. No one in particular that I can think of... (Taps fingers...) Just feed me twice a day and keep my bowl of Diet Green Tea fresh? Ok! Deal!

Posted by: Litelysalted at December 14, 2006 2:37 PM

A moment of silence for the best one-off character on the X-Files.

Clyde: You know, there are worse ways to go, but I can't think of a more undignified one than auto-erotic asphyxiation.

Mulder: Why are you telling me that?

Posted by: lurkretia at December 14, 2006 3:00 PM

Oh, good grief, Julia Roberts! I'll admit, sadly, that I'm a fool for a few chick flicks (Love Actually? LOVED it!), but I'm not falling for this dreck.

Besides, my husband still hasn't forgiven me (nor have I forgiven myself) for America's Sweethearts, so there's no way he'd go with me.

Posted by: idgiepug at December 14, 2006 3:01 PM

Was Julia Roberts ever good, in like ANYTHING?


really

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 14, 2006 3:51 PM

Posted by: Brian at December 14, 2006 4:16 PM

Thanks, B.

Posted by: ranylt at December 14, 2006 4:37 PM

Wait a sec; this is that movie based on the novels of Christopher Paolini, who wrote Eragon when he was 16, right? Nice. I love films that make me feel like a failure in life.




Don't worry, it's completely shitty.

Posted by: Ruby at December 14, 2006 4:52 PM

Happiness Sold Separately? If it starred Joanna Kerns, was made in 1997 and aired on the Lifetime Network, I would be on that shit like white on rice.

But starring Julia Roberts in 2006 in mainstream cinema? To which I also say: Fuck hughhhh, Julia Roberts!

PS: You manly men types could use a female writer for this site. No one in particular that I can think of... (Taps fingers...) Just feed me twice a day and keep my bowl of Diet Green Tea fresh? Ok! Deal!
------------------------------------------------

With witticisms like that how could they not! Oh, wait...

Posted by: Gmoff Tarkin at December 14, 2006 5:48 PM

Oh come now, Undercover Brother is a genuine guilty pleasure. Dave Chappelle is hilarious, er, SOLID, as Conspiracy Brother.

Posted by: KRK at December 14, 2006 6:23 PM

In Bruce Campbell's autobiography he says Raimi wanted to do the first Shadow but ended up doing the way better Darkman.

Posted by: Tim at December 14, 2006 7:25 PM

"You mess with the 'fro, you got to go."

Correct me if I am wrong, but was "Beat It" by Michael Jackson playing in the background when Undercover Brother and Mr. Feather were fighting? Easily one of the funniest fight scenes of all time. And props to Mr. Howser...he may talk a lot of shit, but he down. And one of the best quotes of the movie:

Undercover Brother: You know what they say, behind every great black man...

Conspiracy Brother: is the police.

Undercover Brother: No.

Smart Brother: A bunch of slow white athletes?

Undercover Brother: No!

White She-Devil: A cute butt.

Undercover Brother: NO!

Lance: Probable cause.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at December 14, 2006 7:32 PM

The J. Roberts movie is a particularly interesting choice seeing as Julia is a man-stealer, herself.

Posted by: Samantha T at December 14, 2006 7:51 PM

Have you noticed the poster for "Charlotte's Web"?

is it just me, or does this look like 10 seconds before Wilbur munches a spider?

Posted by: UncleJR at December 14, 2006 9:00 PM

forget "The Shadow" lets get billy Zane back as the phantom, a way better hero, plus he gets to fight pirates which this summer proved with generate money regardless of meritable film making

Posted by: matt at December 14, 2006 10:18 PM

"Fuck hughhh, Julia Roberts": great acoustic and visual, thank you litelysalted!

Posted by: woollies at December 15, 2006 12:53 AM

Are you guys going to comment on the Golden Globes at all?

Posted by: Brian at December 15, 2006 3:02 AM

Cheryl, I was going to ask the same thing...
What's wrong with 'Happiness'? This is why people feel they don't have to spell or even read properly.

"Happyness... oh, it's about happy-ness! Tee hee hee! I heart it."

Posted by: Tina at December 15, 2006 3:14 AM

In reference to Item #4, which will bring about the end of human civilization with the help of that god awful Gwen Stefani song "Wind It Up" (which is a blight on humanity): Are they fucking serious? I might as well place a foot soaker in front of my stove and cook some fuckin' pot roast because Christ knows that with this movie feminism or whatever the hell you want to call it that makes it okay for women not to spend all their time cooking and primping will be as dead as laser discs. A pox on you J-Rob!

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at December 15, 2006 3:38 AM

can't wait for your opinions on eragon. i liked the book a lot, and the movie... well, i'll just save it for the actual review's comments section. just curious...

Posted by: irina at December 15, 2006 7:52 AM

On an above comment by Cody, its a Y because the guy who's life the movie is based on just saw a mural with happyness spelled that way sometime; and i guess he decided to persue it.

Also, not to be a jerk dustin, but its De Beers with the stranglehold... not zales.

Good stuff though.

Posted by: drewskamahoff at December 15, 2006 8:45 AM

Gmoff Tarkin... That really hurt my feelings.

Posted by: Litelysalted at December 15, 2006 8:52 AM

Litelysalted, I wouldn't get too offended by someone who uses a Star Wars character as his nickname. Just my two cents.

Posted by: TK at December 15, 2006 9:03 AM

Hey Dustin, et al... you guys are getting spammed on a bunch of old collumns.... don't know the best way to let you know.... on homeland security, and a scanner darkly

Posted by: Lizzie at December 15, 2006 10:14 AM

TK...she was showcaswing her commanding use of sarcasm and italics...you and Gabrielle should get together and start a blog, I would read it (again, sarcasm).

Posted by: Gmoff Tarkin at December 15, 2006 10:39 AM

Dustin, don't go starting to feel bad about wasting your life. I read that Eragon book and man, was it crappy. It's just what you'd imagine a novel written by a 16 year-old would be. The young-uns will luv it, but anyone with a mind will give it a pass.

Posted by: monkey boy at December 15, 2006 11:54 AM

A Star Wars character?! Heeeee!!!!!

And I already have my own blog, thanks!

Posted by: Litelysalted at December 15, 2006 11:57 AM

Litelysalted, do you also post as "TK"? Must be a stellar blog, as evidenced by your fastidious attention to detail.

Posted by: Gmoff Tarkin at December 15, 2006 12:51 PM

The only thing you said that suprised me about the Julia Roberts movie is, "if a woman would just cut her hair short..." SHORT? I'm amazed it isn't EXTENTIONS. Man, it's like every woman you see has to have that long, long hair with the flippyness on the sides, now. It's freakin' relentless. Anything above the shoulders is "not sexy." Oh, and Julia Roberts as a person scares me. I read she's having her next set of kids (she WANTS more twins!) practically manufactured in utero, using the most expensive and experimental genetic determination techniques. She's like the Joan Crawford of the 21st century. Oh, and thanks to the people who say "Eragon" sucks. Everyone I know said it was great, but I didn't think so. And 16-year olds who manage to have their crappy books published can bite me.

Posted by: something-licious at December 15, 2006 1:47 PM

The big criticism I heard about the Eragon books was that they were basically Star Wars in a fantasy setting. I never knew what to make of that, really. Considering good ol' Lucas wasn't exactly original himself. But he did try to cover it up more.

And even if it is a crappy book, he still got it published when he was barely old enough to drive, have it become a best seller, and get a nice check from the movie. I don't know about you, but I agree with DR in the failure-feeling part.
And NO ONE ELSE was with me on the Charlotte's Web thing? The spider could read and write, people!!!

Posted by: Vermillion at December 15, 2006 1:58 PM

"And NO ONE ELSE was with me on the Charlotte's Web thing? The spider could read and write, people!!!"

I'll get behind you on that. I was more of a Stuart Little girl myself, but I liked CW too. I'm also kind of craving some bacon right now. Mmmmmm. Bacon.

Posted by: em at December 15, 2006 3:48 PM

On Charlotte's Web: anybody besides me ever wonder why the townfolk were so impressed with a flipping pig when there was a SPIDER THAT COULD READ AND WRITE ENGLISH?!!!! Wouldn't that be more interesting than some future Jimmy Dean sausage?

Vermillion, I'm late to the party but if that marriage offer still stands, I might have to accept. I'm still laughing at this....

The J. Roberts movie is a particularly interesting choice seeing as Julia is a man-stealer, herself.

Come on, Sam T. Surely, you're not on the "Julia's a homewrecker" train, are you? Because wouldn't that completely exempt the man himself from responsibility, given that he left his wife? I don't understand this double standard - why is the other woman worse than the man? Why is it assumed that the man was tied down and stolen in the middle of the night, against his will, to be the other woman's lover for life? OTOH, you could be using sarcasm there, and I would have caught the "more dense than Jessica Simpson" bug that has spread randomly on the thread. And then....well, I'll just feel silly. LOL. But my point still stands!

Posted by: Daphne at December 16, 2006 12:29 AM

Daphne: I highly enjoyed your writing; Vermillion: Your posts were hilarious, and I got the exact same 'Darkman' opinion you had when I connected the Shadow and Sam Raimi - after Darkman, another Shadow remake would be irritably redundant.
But Seth Freilich, that Carson show analogy, with its attendant horrifying and violently vivid description - man, I could actually visualize the pain, only in my case it was from doubling over with laughter! That was some truly entertaining reading, as I remember watching Carson religiously during my teens & early 20's.
Please write again soon.

Posted by: Tony at December 16, 2006 4:36 AM

"in a really small voice": Julia Roberts was good in Erin Brokovich...

Posted by: Gina at December 16, 2006 2:08 PM

Vermillion, I think I have the answer to your question.

I didn't really follow the argument, but T.H. White goes on for a paragraph or two about the power of advertising and popular credulity. Why, one might come to believe that a horsey, big-footed, walks like a man actress is beautiful.

"One can only imagine what any spawn that had derived from her marriage to Lyle Lovett would have produced."

I did not want that image in my mind, UncleJR. The fucking 'tater toes alone....

Daphne, I find your point a little fake dense. Let's put her personal record aside (no, I don't think it's more permissable for a man to be an asshole. Do you think it's more permissable for a woman to be the same thing?)

In the vast majority of her (successful) movies, her character is a hyper-flirtacious, horsey homewrecker. But her public, instead finding her pathetic, find her cute. Sympathetic. A good old girl-next-door harpy with a heart of gold.

Posted by: Janis at December 18, 2006 11:10 PM

Daphne, I find your point a little fake dense. Let's put her personal record aside (no, I don't think it's more permissable for a man to be an asshole. Do you think it's more permissable for a woman to be the same thing?)

Huh? OK, first of all, I NEVER implied that it was permissible for a woman to be an asshole. My point was that the trend always seems to be to blame the "other" woman when a husband leaves his wife. Like he was dragged out of it against his will or something. Julia wasn't the married one - her current husband was, at the time. IMO, he bears sole responsibility for the dissolution of his marriage, not Julia. I realize that's not the popular thought, but it's what I think. To be clear, I don't like Julia Roberts, either. And I don't think she's blameless in getting involved with a married man. But I'm also not so filled with hate for her that I'm unwilling to call a spade a spade. Assuming he was still married when he hooked up with Julia, he's a coward and a wimp for not having the balls to either 1) work it out, or 2) end the damn marriage before getting involved with someone else. If it were reversed, and she were the one married, I would say she bears sole responsibility. You either decide to stay married or you don't (I'm not sure who filed for divorce in his marriage), and frankly, if a third person is allowed into the mix, that's because the (cheating) spouse allowed it.

Posted by: Daphne at December 19, 2006 9:21 PM



searchthesite.jpg