web
counter
 

What If You Got One Night, Free from Your Marriage, To Go Bird-Dogging for Ass?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (32)



the_freebie01-550x365.jpg

Couples in troubled relationships try ridiculous things sometimes to keep that relationship alive. I’ve known couples who have attempted to bring in a permanent third partner into a relationship — with disastrous results — and others who have gone — or at least, took a stab at — the polyamorous route, which doesn’t really work very well, either. Relationships are like the political system in America: A two-party minimum. Bring in a legitimate third party, and well, you get George W. Bush as president.

Katie Aselton’s The Freebie, which is probably my favorite indie of the year, slightly ahead of the unreleased The Myth of the American Sleepover and The Kids Are All Right. The premise sounds absurd, but then, so does a three-person relationship. What’s magnificent about The Freebie, which features the best performance Dax Shepard will ever give in his entire life, is that it takes an odd conceit — each partner in this marriage gets one free night to troll for ass — and it very organically tracks the results. It feels almost like a documentary — it’s amazingly natural and real. It doesn’t veer into unexpected territory — it works out as predictably as you’d expect a relationship trick like that to work out, but it’s no less engrossing or emotionally intense.

It opens in NYC on September 17th. I’d love to see it do well enough to get a wider release. It’s a phenomenal movie. Here’s the trailer.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Panzer 88 Concept Art | From The Good Star Wars Producer -- Nazis! Tanks! Monsters! | "Three Inches" Casting News | I Swear It's Really Six









Comments

One free night? WOW! If I got an opportunity like that, you know who I would nail? I would totally ... I mean absolutely ... I'd go after ... um, I'd, um ...

Hmmmmm .....

Curses. I've been married 28 years, I don't KNOW any women.

I'd go to a movie, then have a beer at the bar and watch the ballgame, I guess.

*sob my life is over sob*

Posted by: , at August 26, 2010 9:39 AM

I know quite a few people who would be very angry at your dismissal of polyamorous and nonmonogamous relationships. Yes, they're difficult relationships to maintain, but any relationship is difficult. Not everyone is capable of nonmonogamy, but many people are-- and those people can find some of the most honest, loving, trusting relationships I've ever seen.

People are all over the spectrum on pretty much every issue you can think of. This is one of them.

Posted by: That Girl at August 26, 2010 9:47 AM

(( M i x e d M a t c h i n g --- C_o_m)) The wonderful place where you can mingle with hot singles who are looking to date outside their race. Find your partner here whether they reside within your own neighborhood or abroad.

Posted by: Hermr06 at August 26, 2010 9:59 AM

Bring in a legitimate third party, and well, you get George W. Bush as president.

Listen, I get it. I'm still bitter about W. I'll probably be pissed about it for the rest of my life. But blame Nader? That's just bullshit. Look to the Supreme Court if you want to assign blame.

Posted by: Scully at August 26, 2010 10:00 AM

Do you not mean The Myth of the American Sleepover?

Sorry. It's the second day in a row that I've done this.

Yes. That's exactly what I meant. Damnit. I'm already messing up today. -- DR

Posted by: TSF at August 26, 2010 10:00 AM

Yeah, I kind of feel like proposing something like this in a relationship would go one of two ways:
One, you already have your freebie in mind, there's someone you've been eyeing for a while and thinking, "hmmm, if I wasn't already married..." Which to me, already speaks volumes about your relationship.
Two, you don't have anyone in mind and you're supposed to go out and find an easy lay in one night...which is both a lot of pressure and also kind of gross. That doesn't strike me as enjoyable at all.

Posted by: peachfish at August 26, 2010 10:01 AM

ThatGirl, I believe the more accepted route is to self-righteously proclaim one's monogamy and then cheat.

On another note, I always wondered who celebrities have on their freebie lists. After all, it must be a bit embarrassing if you're actually going to bump into your freebie #5 at a premiere.

Posted by: embertine at August 26, 2010 10:04 AM

Godtopus bless you spambot.

I'm really having a lot of difficulty dealing with the fact that Dax Shepard appears to have put in a hell of a performance. I mean, have you seen Let's Go to Jail? Fuck me with a splintery broom handle I thought his career was done.

Posted by: admin at August 26, 2010 10:07 AM

This is the kind of question one should not ask if one is not prepared to hear the answer.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at August 26, 2010 10:23 AM

Is it mildly ironic that many of the people who are quick to accuse their other half of infidelity do so because they themselves are unfaithful? It would seem they want the benefit of a freebie as a participant but don't want the burden of observing their partner doing so on them. The ultimate having your cake and eating it too.

The reality is that there really is no such thing as a freebie. It will always cost you. At best you'll always have a unspoken level of mistrust and and at worst toll the death knell of the relationship. I've actually known a couple involved in "open" relationships. It was utterly pointless. It was like a step below Friends with Benefits. Everything looked fine until there was a pregnancy scare and then the shit came out about how he really felt about her nailing someone else despite the fact his dance card was much longer than hers. I guess even in the cheating department quality still trumps quantity.

So guys, if you're being offered an opportunity of having a freebie, yes, this is a trap. Red flags, air raid sirens, and panicking Robots from "Lost in Space" should be apparent. You're either having your loyalty tested or you're being offered an easy out (on whose part remains up for debate). If your relationship has gone stale, screwing someone new will not likely fix things. Either find out what it is that's missing and try to discover it in your current relationship or break it off or move on.

Or better still let everyone else know what going on so we can all watch the the inevitable train wreck because some of us are ghouls in that way.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 26, 2010 10:27 AM

i dont know. The woman is not that attractive and I bet they talk A LOT. I bet most of the movie is people talking.

And you know there will be no hot sex scenes.

Posted by: logan at August 26, 2010 10:30 AM

So...like...like threesomes?

Posted by: your roommate at August 26, 2010 10:35 AM

I just don't get the nonmonogamous relationship thing, especially if you have children. Probably because in my own cop buddy film way, "I'm getting too bourgeois for this shit."

Tracer Bullet makes a salient point that applies to all aspects of life.

Also words of wisdom from a friend long ago -

Just because you're not in control, doesn't mean the other person is.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at August 26, 2010 10:45 AM

Wanted to post a defense of Dax Shepard, because while it's totally understandable why so many people are hesitant to acknowledge him as a legit actor, he really is great. I really only knew him from a couple of episodes of Punk'd, and then heard he'd be one of the stars of Parenthood. I was pretty bummed, wondering why he was in a show with so many great actors (Peter Krause, Lauren Graham, etc). Having now watched the entire first season of the show (which is FABULOUS, btw), I am a convert. He's great - handles subtle comedy really well, does wonderful emotional scenes, he runs the gamut. I knew there had to be a reason Kristen Bell was engaged to him - there had to be more to him than the guy who starred in Without a Paddle (never seen it, but didn't look good). Seriously you guys, he's good. Promise.

Posted by: Nicole at August 26, 2010 10:45 AM

This looks really good! I've thought that Dax Shepard was great on Parenthood and those tattoos....oooooh boy do I love someone with tattoos.

Anyways, the woman playing his wife looks great too! Why haven't I seen her in more movies. Definitely adding this to my to-watch list.

And I can't wait for the Myth of the American Sleepover either, when is that being released??

Posted by: grace b at August 26, 2010 10:53 AM

Oh Spambot, the one post you could have made a relevant comment on and you had to go and make it about race. For shame.

Posted by: Paul at August 26, 2010 10:59 AM

I'm with "," on this one. I don't know any men. I'd probably stay home, rent a movie, drink a cup of tea, and weave.

The thing is, you don't go out and find something better than you have at home.

EX 1: Tiger Woods. Was married to a gorgeous blond swimsuit model. Freebies. Have you seen his butt ugly freebies?

EX 2: David Boreanaz. Is married to a former Playboy bunny. Freebies. Same butt ugly ones Tiger boned.

EX 3: Hulk Hogan. Freebies look exactly like his daughter.

And these are people who can afford the very best.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 26, 2010 11:22 AM

BWeaves,

It is common knowledge that men generally cheat "down," meaning the ladies they cheat with are inferior to their partners, especially in the looks department.

Women can cheat whenever they feel like it because most single guys are patiently waiting in the wings for your girlfriend/wife to offer them sex.

Seriously, go ask a single guy if they want to have sex. You'll have penis in you quicker than you can say, "Not really, I was just testing you."

Posted by: Kballs at August 26, 2010 11:41 AM

You misunderstand the reason why men cheat. Men cheat for different, not better. It's great if she is better, but the point is that she's not you.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at August 26, 2010 11:44 AM

Kballs, that's what I don't get about the whole non-monogamous thing. The playing field just isn't level.

Posted by: jon29 at August 26, 2010 11:53 AM

I wouldn't. It would make me feel like crap about myself. Plus who? Why? I don't even want to cheat.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at August 26, 2010 12:01 PM

BWeaves - I think it's fair to say the Tiger Woods "freebies" have proven very expensive indeed.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at August 26, 2010 1:07 PM

I've been non-monogamous for the last two and a half years, and at this point, the fact that people just default to monogamy seems bizarre and foreign to me. Why limit your options just because you've met someone you like? I'm not saying I'll never be monogamous again, but it certainly isn't something I feel I have to leap into so the object of my affection doesn't skitter away.

I think the people saying "I'm married, so I don't know any men/women" are the weird ones.

Posted by: kate the great at August 26, 2010 2:28 PM

This movie looks dreadful and as far from real life as one could imagine. And come on, let's be honest, women who brag about being in non-monogamous relationships are, for the most part, hounds.

Posted by: Durward at August 26, 2010 4:04 PM

kate the great allow me to try to explain.

I genuinely like my husband. I prefer his company to most people in the world.

I also love my husband and respect the relationship we have, along with the agreed-upon boundaries it has. It's a bit stronger than that, but I don't want to gross anyone out with stuff about adoring him and thinking he's the greatest man who ever lived (though I do). Whoops, I did it anyway.

Because of those things and for many other reasons, I simply don't know any men I am sexually attracted to. I guess because I'm not looking?

That's it. I think you have to be looking with something in mind to even SEE.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at August 26, 2010 5:08 PM

@Snuggiepants, I was in a 4-year relationship during which I never even thought to stray. I understand what you're saying, kind of. But even though I was happily monogamous in that relationship, I certainly still NOTICED people. I just knew that I valued my relationship more than I did any cheap flings I might have.

It's one thing to say you're never tempted. It's quite another to say you don't know any women/men, and that was the original statement I was responding to.

FREE LOVE!

Posted by: kate the great at August 26, 2010 5:36 PM

One free night? Ugh. Honey, I don't have the inclination or the energy.

Posted by: greer at August 26, 2010 8:11 PM

Why does the expression "There's no such thing as a free lunch" keep popping into my mind?

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 26, 2010 9:29 PM

It is common knowledge that men generally cheat "down," meaning the ladies they cheat with are inferior to their partners, especially in the looks department.
---
It wasn't ever easy, but Bill Clinton managed it.

Posted by: , at August 27, 2010 1:43 AM

BWeaves,

You and I should hook up. Just once.

Posted by: , at August 27, 2010 1:44 AM

Okay, I'm newly married and doe-eyed and shit, so add THAT pinch of salt to what I'm saying, but... are one night stands really all that better?
I mean, everybody has their own little hot-buttons, and they don't seem to be something a person's going to just drop in the lap of an unknown, not without reaching a certain comfort level first. So it's going to take a lot longer than a night to figure out how what knocks each particular person's socks off.

It seems like the entire attraction of 'freebie sex' is the having-of-the-sex-with-someone-else, not the sex itself.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at August 27, 2010 2:00 AM

Hey ScienceGeek! Yeah, you're right, it often does take some time for two people to really get to know how to get each other off. But the charged atmosphere (I like to call it "the dirty dirty wrong wrong") of illicit sex can sometimes make the experienence super hot.

Also, for cheaters, it's not about the quality of the sex, it's about the thrill of the whole thing. Just like shoplifters don't always steal exciting stuff, cheaters aren't going for mind-blowing sex. They're after the dirty/wrong/forbidden.

Mazel tov on the whole "just married" thing.

Posted by: kate the great at August 27, 2010 2:24 PM