I knew absolutely nothing about Iron Man six months ago, and I wasn’t all that excited about it. Fortunately for me, Dan — who had originally been assigned that review — had a wedding that weekend, leaving me to cover the film. And, as is ancient history, it blew me away (though, I still disagree with Ted - it’s not quite The Dark Knight).
Here’s the point: While my default mode is skeptical when it comes to geek flicks, I’m willing to be won over. Hell, I was won over by V for Vendetta, and it’s still the only comic book I’ve ever read. Unfortunately, so far, I don’t get The Watchmen. I was wholly underwhelmed by the trailer, and though I am not familiar with any of the characters, I can’t help but think that half the actors have been miscast. There are certain actors who just don’t belong in comic-book movies, and Patrick Wilson, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Malin Ackerman, and Billy Crudup make up half that list (Carla Gugino, I can see). I’m not ruling out the possibility that the most anticipated geek movie of 2009 will be good, but if it’s going to be so great, why a March release date? Why not May or June?
Anyway, two more minutes of footage has been released, and based on it, my mind hasn’t changed. I’m even more skeptical. I mean, seriously? Malin Ackerman?
In other geek news, Vermillion, undoubtedly the geekiest of Pajiba geeks, sent me a trailer for Dragonball. I have no idea what Dragonball is, but based on the trailer, I’m thinking it’s probably based on a video game. And no offense, V, but I don’t think this is gonna break the video-game adaptation losing streak.
In more mainstream geek news, here’s a promo for Season Five of “Lost.” And after a invigorating, breathtaking Season Four, I don’t know how they keep the momentum up. But if this promo is any indication, they may very well have managed it.
Finally, just a geek-related site note. On Monday, arguably the coolest thing that has ever happened on Pajiba will take place. I won’t say anymore. But please do check back.
And no offense, V, but I don't think this is gonna break the video-game adaptation losing streak.
I am only doing this because it is early, and I don't want my geek cred besmirched:
1) Dragonball is actually a pretty massive media empire built on the anime of the same name. Based on Journey to the West, it has spawned sequels, animated movies (theatrical and video), toys, and yes, video games. But it is not in and of itself just a video game.
So it is a shitty ANIME adaptation. not a shitty video game adaptation.
2) I never said it was going to be any good. This is that stupid Tom Brady/Peyton Manning/Who gives a shit football joke during my "Comebacks" review all over again.
I assure you good people that it is just as crappy to me as it is to any of you.
Sheesh. It is too goddamn early for geeking out like this.
Dragonball as in Dragonball Z? I used to see episodes of that when my kid was casually interested in it, and I never could follow the storyline. But I always suspected it was like watching a soap opera: there were so many characters and threads that it just took some continuous watching to figure out what was going on.
Read Watchmen, Dustin. It is worth it. Whether or not the movie will blow, well, the jury's still out on that. But you won't regret reading it, especially in our current political environment where we are thinking about the changing nature of government and heroes.
Posted by: Wednesday at October 24, 2008 9:35 AM
Dragonball is extrordinarily cruel to inflict on the unaware, Vermillion.
Spoiler: it blows.
Posted by: twig at October 24, 2008 9:35 AM
You should definitely read the graphic novel for League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, if only to redeem the title after the movie (Proven fact: I am one of only five people in the entire world that liked the LoEG movie, one of the other people is my boyfriend and the other three are mentally imbalanced)
Posted by: Renee at October 24, 2008 9:41 AM
If you need a good shonen (read: explosions, tits) fix, the new volume of the Hellsing manga came out.
There are really no words to describe how good that manga is. It's like Quentin Tarantino humping the director's cut of A Clockwork Orange. With zombies. And vampires. And Nazis. And guns.
Posted by: twig at October 24, 2008 9:43 AM
... werewolf nazis.
ok I'm done now.
I am one of only five people in the entire world that liked the LoEG movie,
You really are. GNs are exceptional, though.
Posted by: twig at October 24, 2008 9:44 AM
Dragonball as in Dragonball Z? I used to see episodes of that when my kid was casually interested in it, and I never could follow the storyline. But I always suspected it was like watching a soap opera: there were so many characters and threads that it just took some continuous watching to figure out what was going on.
That is pretty much accurate. Dragon Ball Z (or DBZ) is the sequel to Dragon Ball. Dragon Ball Z is also the main reason some people hate anime: when the most memorable feature of your show is that a fight between two people lasts twenty(!) episodes, it tends to turn people off.
But it is a soap opera, but instead of who is giving birth to whose baby, its who is finally going to channel enough energy to blow up the frickin' planet and kill the other bastard already.
I second the "Read Watchmen!" call. Truly extraordinary book.
As for the movie coming out in March, it's a precedent. The last few years have seen a major R rated comic book adaptation release in March. Sin City, V for Vendetta, 300, even The Matrix was a March release. It's where the studios put their niche blockbusters so I see it as a good sign.
Posted by: TylerDFC at October 24, 2008 9:48 AM
I just read Watchmen and adored it Dustin, and I'm the type who usually sees a graphic novel and runs screaming. Now I'm hooked and am on the third volume of Gaiman's Sandman.
I'm psyched for the movie though...I agree with the meh-ness of Ackerman, but in the trailer the film seemed to at least capture the essence of Rorschach (Haley) and The Comedian (Morgan).
Posted by: Julie at October 24, 2008 9:50 AM
Now I'm hooked and am on the third volume of Gaiman's Sandman.
Absolute editions? God, those things are so pretty.
Also, Julie, you should be reading Ex Machina if you like Watchmen and aren't already.
Posted by: twig at October 24, 2008 9:54 AM
Kinda annoying how much of that Watchmen footage is repeated from the first trailer, isn't it? You've got a movie that's set to run almost three hours, Snyder, pony up some new screenshots.
Posted by: S.K. at October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
To me, the real question about Watchmen boils down to how well they'll be able to bring out some of the peripheral tragedies in the story. The superheroes were interesting, but the most powerful moments in the comic were the deaths of characters who had almost nothing to do with the main action. These minor characters were exceptionally well-developed, but in a movie they will be lucky to get a minute of screen time.
I knew absolutely nothing about Iron Man six months ago, and I wasn't all that excited about it.
Uh, yeah, that was late April, and I think we all knew RDJ was in it by then, and your reaction to that was pretty clear.
Posted by: Todd at October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
"Seven dragonballs must be found for all man's fate."
Color me intrigued!!!! Here's the synopsis I took away from the trailer: Chow-Yun Fat plays a recovering narcotics addict named Roshi with a penchant for Hawaiian shirts and extremely busy hands. Through the power of his dragon ballz, he teaches a young apprentice, Goku, the difference between good touching and bad.
Youtube of a chimp riding a Segway > Dragon Ball*
*Unless Nic Cage is in it.
Posted by: Just Kyle at October 24, 2008 9:57 AM
Sorry, but YES I love Watchmen but it looks like an action movie, which confuses me. I assume he's doing this for the trailer, right? And the film will be 4 hours long to really capture the Pirate subplot?
And what the fuck was that Dragonball thing? It had no sense of humor. Dragonball was always just so weird that it was funny. It doesn't fit in a real world unless Stephen Chow is making it.
Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at October 24, 2008 9:58 AM
God, those things are so pretty.
They really ARE. I find myself staring at the pretty pictures and forgetting to turn the page :)
I'll definitely check out Ex Machina...and I'm dying to read League of Extraordinary Gentleman.
Posted by: Julie at October 24, 2008 10:06 AM
to really capture the Pirate subplot?
That story is going to be its own DVD release concurrent with the film.
Julie, also, it wasn't one of my favorites but I know other Pajibans are fans and so it's an obligation to mention they just released the first Y: The Last Man deluxe graphic novel.
(Ex Machina is better, imo)
Posted by: twig at October 24, 2008 10:12 AM
Anyone who hasn't actually read Watchmen isn't going to understand jack shit about the trailer. It's designed to keep the (large) fanbase optimistic that keys points of the plot haven't been changed by showing key scenes from the book. Those scenes out of context, however, make no goddamn sense.
Do yourself a favor and read the book. It's written by the same guy who did V for Vendetta, and it really is one of the best comic books ever made.
Posted by: Gabi at October 24, 2008 10:21 AM
I gotta disagree with the miscast criticism; I was skeptical at first, but I think that the film looks pretty fantastic, and I can't wait to see Jeffrey Dean Morgan as the Comedian. Watchmen isn't really a "comic book" anyway, and I think you do it a disservice if you lump it into the spandex-and-supervillians genre.
Posted by: Girlnone at October 24, 2008 10:29 AM
Oh, Vermillion. Again with the anime? Must you make it so easy?
**guuuuuhhhh....**
Posted by: TK at October 24, 2008 10:35 AM
I loves me any kind of Watchmen news. I've loved all the footage I've seen to date. They really have seemed to capture the look and feel of all the major characters. Then again, we all know Snyder can make very pretty movies, it's really what's under the hood (pun intended) that's going to matter here.
There's simply no way anyone would be able to capture all of the subtleties and complexities of the story. There is just a massive amount of material (much of which is pretty intricate) in the 12 issues. Other than doing it in a mini-series, you're never going to be able to do justice to the complete body of work. So, it's all going to come down to whether or not Snyder was able to capture enough of the essence of the story while making the necessary cuts. I remain hopeful that he will.
Everything I've read, interviews and what not, seem to hint at the notion that Snyder "gets" the story and what's important. That said, he has mentioned that he added some more "action" to some of the scenes. Also, we're going to get his trademark slow-motion/speed-up action sequences. As much as I enjoyed it in "300", I just don't think it's necessary in "Watchmen". "300" was a story about 300 bad asses killing thousands. The violence and action was the story and making it hyper-realistic worked. That said, it wont really bother me here. I can get over that even if it's not the direction I would take it.
I am still not convinced about Akerman. Then again, I've never seen her in anything. Laurie is one of the meatier rolls and if she doesn't pull it off well a lot could unravel.
Jeffery Dean Morgan looks great as the Comedian. I think his character is one of the hardest to pull off and everything I've seen, I've liked.
They seem to have nailed Rorschach, which is awesome. I read an interview where Snyder commented that he felt that delving into Rorschach's background and his interaction with the prison psychiatrist was one of the most important threads in the story. I couldn't agree more.
Since Julie and twig opened the floor to further comic discussion... I totally agree with twig on Ex Machina. I love it. Same with Y: The Last Man. You really can't go wrong with Brian K. Vaughn. The first two League of Extraordinary Gentlemen stories are great. I was less than thrilled with The Black Dossier.
There are quite a few other great series out there. Others I'd recommend, include Fables, Transmetropolitan, Top Ten, 100 Bullets, Umbrella Academy, some Hellblazer, and probably Preacher, though the last one isn't quite for everyone.
Posted by: ajax19 at October 24, 2008 10:37 AM
It's only miscast if you're looking for the usual superhero types; one of the key themes of Watchmen is how unfit the "heroes" are for their jobs, and I think the casting reflects those characters. The only name you mentioned that were questionable was Patrick Wilson, since he's supposed to play an overweight geek with more gadgets than ability. But considering the fact that Wilson was willing to put on 20 pounds for the role, I feel encouraged that he's putting some effort into portraying the character.
Posted by: SJ at October 24, 2008 11:00 AM
I knew nothing about Watchmen before having seen the trailers, and I'm very intrigued. I've never picked up a graphic novel in my life - but based on comments here I may give it a try.
Cannot wait for the return of Lost. Life seems so uneventful without Ben.
Posted by: Cindy at October 24, 2008 11:15 AM
Ooh, Julie, I recently read Watchmen for the first time too. I loved it. I'm looking forward to the movie, but definitely aware that not everything will make it in. I'll still watch (& hopefully enjoy) it for what it is, though.
I'm currently toward the end of the Fables (love them) and debating where to go next. I'd love to start Sandman, but I'm still debating between trades and the big pretty books. I think it'll probably be Y, because a friend has a bunch of them and I can borrow instead of spending. I keep looking for the first issues of Preacher but haven't been able to find them, though I know Amazon had them last I checked. Oh, the 3rd Buffy trade should be out this week! Finally, for godtopus' sake. And thanks to everybody here for those suggestions... I wouldn't have known what to look for if it wasn't for you nerds!
Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at October 24, 2008 11:17 AM
Dragonball itself wasn't too bad, for a silly anime. The follow-ons (Z and GT) got progressively worse for the drawn-out, predictably battles.
The worst was when a five-minute countdown to a planet exploding literally took 8 weeks of daily 30 minute episodes to complete. Damn!
Posted by: Drake at October 24, 2008 11:28 AM
More Watchmen news...
Just released this week "Watching the Watchman"
Geek nirvana! Hardcover by Dave Gibbons, background, conceptual sketches, watercolors, inkblots... communication between the artists and DC. super-fucking-cool.
Posted by: bookslut at October 24, 2008 11:36 AM
Proven fact: I am one of only five people in the entire world that liked the LoEG movie, one of the other people is my boyfriend and the other three are mentally imbalanced)
Renee, count me as one of the mentally unbalanced. I own the dvd.
...Man, I've got shitty taste in movies.
Posted by: popejenn at October 24, 2008 11:38 AM
Dustin, Read Watchmen now. like now. you won't regret it. It's one of the most fantastic things I've ever read, period. Read it and you'll understand that these characters aren't typical comic book/superhero characters at all, which will explain some of the casting choices (although probably not erase all of your confusion).
Posted by: Joe at October 24, 2008 11:38 AM
Imbalanced...unbalanced... To-may-to, to-mah-to.
Posted by: popejenn at October 24, 2008 11:39 AM
Also, Dragonball looks terrible. I loved Dragonball Z when I was in like 4th-6th grad, and that trailer bears no resemblance whatsoever to the shows, other than some character names, some balls, and people shooting energy at each other. Like the shows weren't set in the real, modern world with cars and shit. that's not gonna be good.
Posted by: Joe at October 24, 2008 11:43 AM
Dustin, you admit to being ignorant about comic books, but you have the entire internet at your disposal to do some research and get a basic understanding of what you're writing about. A little bit of searching on Wikipedia never hurt anybody.
The Dragonball movie looks even more annoying than the cartoon.
Posted by: Dave at October 24, 2008 11:43 AM
*muttering*....the whole goddamn point is that she's named "Mina Murray" and exhibits nothing strange or remarkable and won't talk about her past, so you just have to get it or not, goddammit.......fucking extra pointless characters....*end muttering*
Ahem. Okay.
I think Dustin's gone too far with the supposed "Dragonball" ignorance and has been feigning all of it.
Unless I'm simply the Bizarro, not giving a damn about "Lost" instead.
It is indeed too much recycling, but I'm still hot and bothered for "Watchmen". And what other movie am I interested in seeing til then?
Again: thanks for ruining Christmas, assholes! Yeeeees you're gonna get my Federation and Hogwarts money, you know you are.
Re: Watchmen Movie - I read somewhere (don't recal where) that the Pirate subplot was dropped.
Posted by: Arnie at October 24, 2008 11:56 AM
Uhh....wasn't dragonball the one where the characters turned white when they got really powerful? As in blond-haired, blue-eyed aryan white?
Posted by: s. pisaster at October 24, 2008 11:56 AM
Re: Watchmen Movie - I read somewhere (don't recall where) that the Pirate subplot was dropped.
Posted by: Arnie at October 24, 2008 11:57 AM
Gabi, it's worth pointing out (not to you, but to others like Rowles who may not have the background) that Alan Moore wrote the comic book V for Vendetta, but absolutely disowned the movie.
My biggest complaint--side note: yeah Dustin, just read the fucking Watchmen already--is just the fact that every single main character (apart from Crudup as Dr. Manhattan, with the no aging thing) is portrayed by an actor who is at least 20 years too young. Building on what SJ said about them being unfit for their jobs, each of them is also supposed to be way past their prime crimefighting days--the Comedian is in his sixties, everyone else in their early forties and Laurie in her late thirties.
And I'll agree with Ajax, Transmetropolitan is trippy but great (though I'm only halfway through at this point).
As noted above, the Pirate subplot was dropped from the movie, but is being released on a special DVD a week after the movie comes out.
The DVD will contain an animated Tales of the Black Freighter (with Gerard Butler providing the voice for the main character) and a mockumentary called Under the Hood about the "Minutemen" and "Watchmen".
While the guy playing the Comedian is probably a good 15-20 years younger than the character, I don't think the rest are really that far off the mark. Jackie Earl Haley is 47 and Patrick Wilson is 35. I think most of the Watchmen (not Minutemen) were supposed to be in their mid-30's to early 40's or so.
The casting doesn't really bother me at all, other than Akerman being a complete unknown and Patrick Wilson, even with the extra 20 pounds, still looking a bit too fresh.
Posted by: ajax19 at October 24, 2008 12:09 PM
Well, Alan Moore disowns everything too, so he's certainly not an impartial critic. That wizard's just a crazy old man. Poor Dave Gibbons almost ends up looking bad.
I had just the same "'aaaang on!" about the ages for a while, but it was stated somewhere that the movie covers a lot of years and there's apparent aging. I can't quite tell if I'm supposed to be looking at 70s or 80s Laurie in those shots, though she and Ozymandias are the ones who still look good in 1985.
Gabi, it's worth pointing out (not to you, but to others like Rowles who may not have the background) that Alan Moore wrote the comic book V for Vendetta, but absolutely disowned the movie.
It's also fair to point out that Moore has also absolutely diowned the "Watchmen" movie as well. It's also fair to point out that Moore is also (i) kinda crazy and (ii) has been badly burned by corporate America several times in disputes regarding his material.
I am a big fan of both the comic and movie versions of V for Vendetta.
Posted by: ajax19 at October 24, 2008 12:16 PM
Watchman is the reason we had batman's slow metamorphosis into something believable. It's not about all the superhero bullshit but rather about what drives regular people to do crazy regular hero bullshit in a costume. The legal and social ramifications and their interactions as a group of people in a very fringe profession. It deals with each one's approach to crime fighting and each of their philosophies about crime fighting.
The comic is a layered story bringing to life several ancillary characters that are just paranoid about the state of the world. The trailer looks like it is going for accuracy but I'm curious to see if they can pull of the end.
The studio ruined I Am Legend by changing the ending and I have to imagine they'll want to ruin this one too.
Posted by: mothman at October 24, 2008 12:26 PM
I'll definitely check out Ex Machina...and I'm dying to read League of Extraordinary Gentleman.
Posted by: Julie at October 24, 2008 10:06 AM
Okay, this is going to sound weird (considering all the perverted stuff you have instgated over the past few months), but I want to attempt to sex you up for that.
Yeah, that is right. I am such a geek, a woman reading comics is hotter to me than her showing her bewbs.
I need help.
Oh, Vermillion. Again with the anime? Must you make it so easy?
Yes, goddammit, AGAIN! AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN!!!!! UNTIL THE BASTARDS GET IT RIGHT, COMPRENDE!?!?!?!!!
Here is the thing with Alan Moore: DC (more specifically, Warner Bros.) screwed him over. They screwed him over good. He told them they could do whatever they wanted with his work as far as movies and shit were concerned, as long as they didn't force him to shill for them. He even offered to forfeit his share of the profits (Dave Gibbons got it all for Vendetta, and I beleive the same is in place for Watchmen).
It isn't that he hates the movies based on his stuff (well, LXG notwithstanding), he just didn't care about that. He just wanted to tell his stories through comics. Some asshat went and tried to use his name to promote the films, and pissed his crazy ass off.
After looking at the Watchmen trailer, I have ONE question:
What's with the woman's (forgive me, I'm bad with names) outfit?
It seems they kept a lot of the other costumes pretty spot on to the book, but why is her's all tight PVC? Oh, wait, is that for the comic BOY nerds?
I liked the dorky appeal of the female costumes in the book. They really LOOKED like something handmade.
Posted by: MadameUgly at October 24, 2008 2:02 PM
My favorite thing about all of the love The Watchmen is getting lately is the amount of attractive women I see on the subway reading it. I guess it is now safe to read comics in public. Leave the costume at home thogh.
I second (3rd? 4th?) the comments above. Transmetropolitan and Ex Machina are great reads. Finished Trans recently and latest Ex TPB(7?) should be waiting for me in the shop when I show up next week.
Posted by: Brian at October 24, 2008 2:26 PM
I haven't the slightest idea what the hell Watchmen is all about. I mean...it looks like it could be interesting, and I'll watch just about any superhero movie out there, but I can't help but feel that those costumes look like something out of Mystery Men. Very cheap and silly looking. But...might be good if I can get past that.
Dragonball looks like a flaming ball of turd. I was cringing and cracking up all through the trailer, and that is NOT a good thing. It looks PAINFUL!
Posted by: figgy at October 24, 2008 3:11 PM
Julie has read Preacher, right? I feel like there's a lot of common ground there. I'm fairly sure you'll find it ass-out-loud funny.
Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at October 24, 2008 3:21 PM
I loved Watchmen, I love Fables, I love Bone, I love V for Vendetta, I love Hellblazer. I feel like I have a pretty solid grasp of graphic novel-dom.
But I fucking hate Y, and I can't stand Preacher. Y boils down to 90% pop culture references--and not fun pop culture references like the cooler Pajibans make, I'm talking Best Week Ever references--and 10% woe is me bullshit.
And Preacher. Please explain how this makes sense: I have the powers of the strongest being in the Universe? Well then, I'm going to find God and make him answer for his crimes. Dude, be a pissed off atheist, but make it fucking cohesive. Don't shoehorn your hate of religion into a story about guys with asses for faces. And I can't stand Bill Hicks wankery. Gag me with a spoon, you subversive-cred-seeking twat.
Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at October 24, 2008 3:51 PM
I haven't read that one Optimus, I'll have to check it out.
Posted by: Julie at October 24, 2008 3:55 PM
Well it's Jesse's history and how and why he gets his power that make him think he'd like a sitdown with the absent one. He is a disgruntled customer and thinks Creation is seriously lacking in oversight. That's the story, Arseface isn't the story with an apocalyptic subplot shoehorned in.
JakesAlterEgo -- don't get me started on Preacher. I don't have time to go into all the ways I think that comic was overrated. (And Julie, you don't "have" to check it out. It can't hurt, if you want to have comic book cred, but don't go in expecting a masterpiece. It ain't Watchmen or Sandman.)
Posted by: Todd at October 24, 2008 4:11 PM
Y boils down to 90% pop culture references--and not fun pop culture references like the cooler Pajibans make, I'm talking Best Week Ever references--and 10% woe is me bullshit.
Sounds more like you are equating the book with Yorick, the main character. Yeah, he was an insufferable twatwaffle. He even says so himself. And I don't see where you are getting the pop culture references deal from either.
But the series itself is beyond good. And anyone who even thinks about saying Agent 355 isn't worth knowing about is going to get their throats ripped out by my teeth.
As has been noted, there is a precedent for R-rated comic book movies... more significantly, however, there is a running clock or watch metaphor running throughout the novel, beginning with an explanation of the old Cold War "Doomsday Clock" that was permanently set at "Five minutes to Midnight." The release date itself is actually an acknowledgment of that metaphor as the month, day, and year reference the hands of a clock.
Posted by: Brad at October 24, 2008 4:30 PM
If you make your protagonist a twatwaffle, there better be a reason to hold me to the rest of the story. You can get by in a film with said twatwaffle just because of the medium itself. But a douchenozzle for a lead in a comic book is insufferable. In fucking sufferable. I don't care about his stories, I don't care about his survival. I kidna just wish everyone went off and had a pint and got caught up on their Cannonball read and left him to the Amazons.
Hanging a lantern on the fact that your lead character is a unlikeable dick doesn't excuse the fact that your lead character is an unlikeable dick.
Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at October 24, 2008 4:50 PM
I wasn't saying it was high art. It just made me giggle inappropriately. Like the word "Duty". You'd be surprised how much I am confronted with this problem.
Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at October 24, 2008 5:00 PM
Totally miscast as far as I can tell.
It's like they took the characters from the graphic novel and tried to figure out what they'd look like 10 or so years younger and in excellent physical fitness. In other words, like superheroes, which is kind of in violation of the one of the main conceits of the book.
Color me disappointed.
Posted by: k.benton at October 24, 2008 5:05 PM
Just wanted to point out that that's James Marsters as 'Piccolo' (the main villain) in the Dragonball trailer...
Posted by: zyzzyva at October 24, 2008 5:14 PM
Soooo...in Dragonball, the chick is named "Bulimia"???
Posted by: meh at October 24, 2008 6:40 PM
I don't get all the hate for Dragonball Z (and by extension, Dragonball). That show was easily one of the greatest animes ever made (fuck evangelion, I don't care what anyone says, any show where the mechs have power cords is going to be shit) and I hold great hope for the movie.
Posted by: Chugga at October 24, 2008 8:49 PM
You just can't have Dragonball without Goku's hair. You just can't. It makes babies cry and puppies die. It's wrong. Why isn't the UN getting involved to prevent these kinds of atrocities?
Posted by: Zac at October 24, 2008 9:21 PM
I am just trying to subside my girl nerd-boner for that Lost trailer.
Oh, that Ben. My thoughts for him are anything but pure.
Posted by: Gabbles at October 24, 2008 10:58 PM
JakesAlterEgoChugga -- don't get me started on PreacherEvangelion. I don't have time to go into all the ways I think that comicanime was overrated. (And Julie, you don't "have" to check it out. It can't hurt, if you want to have comic book cred, but don't go in expecting a masterpiece. It ain't Watchmen or Sandman.)
Posted by: Todd at October 24, 2008 10:59 PM
Dustin, I'm only gonna say this once --- READ WATCHMEN. There's a reason it's the one comic book story that's held up by literary critics as an actual masterpiece. Not Superman. Not Batman. Not X-Men.
Even your cold, bitchy heart can find the warmth in the demise of Big Figure -- an diminutive crime boss who meets a rather wet demise at the hands of Rorschach.
Posted by: BFFredo at October 25, 2008 12:24 AM
Dragonball Z doesn't deserve to be classified as anime. It's a bunch of guys standing around, demonstrating how you could force an anal prolapse.
Guuuuuuuh! Hooooooo! Baaaaaaaah! The powerrrrrrrrrr!
Fuck.
Posted by: Lauren at October 25, 2008 1:03 AM
You just can't have Dragonball without Goku's hair. You just can't. It makes babies cry and puppies die. It's wrong. Why isn't the UN getting involved to prevent these kinds of atrocities?
Posted by: jM at October 25, 2008 3:23 AM
Anyone else spot the words 'Dharma Initiative' flashing up for a single frame at the 0:40 second mark of the Lost Season 5 promo? Thought that was a cool little touch.
Posted by: Dill The Devil at October 25, 2008 8:21 AM
That's a good point ajax19, Watchmen is not going to be traditional at all. There's a very small chance it will be as good as the book, there's a chance it could be terrible, but it seems to be following a good path for the time being. For those of you wondering, Dragonball is the manga/anime that became a huge sensation and made millions of dollars everywhere in the world. The movie is bound to be terrible, and will make more money than the Gross National Product of most of the worlds nations, exactly like Transformers. Fortunately, Lost is still guaranteed to be good, seeing as it's the best TV show ever, and is better at it's worst than most TV shows are at their best. (I'm looking at you Heroes.)
Posted by: George at October 25, 2008 1:08 PM
Fables is the shit.
Posted by: Mick J at October 25, 2008 3:54 PM
Lost is still guaranteed to be good, seeing as it's the best TV show ever
Oh I just can't wait for that final episode to arrive and let down all the Lost-maniacs. Their anger and their contempt will be greater than was felt when The Sopranos went to --- or when Seinfeld ended without a major bang.
Posted by: BFFredo at October 25, 2008 7:33 PM
If Lost ends well enough. (Real answers to solid questions. Real resolutions. No more flashbacks.) I will get "The Numbers" tattooed on my arm. I can only worry that Holocaust survivors may be slightly offended. I think it'd look pretty boss, though. Subtle enough that only a big fan (And by association a big nerd, someone I'd want to hang out with) would understand. Not a definite Yes but I am getting a tattoo and it will be a subtle reference that only a select few will understand. OH MY GODTOPUS. How does the Godtopus feel about depictions of himself on flesh? Is he like Allah? HERE'S MY BOLD CLAIM, PAJIBA. IF PAJIBACON HAPPENS, I WILL HAVE THE GODTOPUS TATTOOED ON MY FLESH. Maybe Skittimus could do it? I believe he is the Cephalopodic One's prophet and chief doodler.
Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at October 26, 2008 1:46 AM
Please take Dustin Rowles off Geek Movie News. Everything he says is ignorant and sarcastic. I'm sure there is a far more appropriate person who could do this column. I realize I'm coming off like some kind of jerk, but I love this website and the usually intelligent writing found within. He doesn't have a clue about the material and always comes off like an ass. Please either lock Dustin in a room and make him read Watchmen, and maybe League of Extrodinary Gentlemen, and possibly some Manga before you does another on of these columns.
Posted by: Quiethunder at October 26, 2008 11:02 AM
YEAH SUCK IT, ROWLES!
Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 26, 2008 11:11 AM
The only thing bigger in the Asian market than Chow Yun Fat is Dragonball. This had to happen.
Like it or not, it looks to me like they're trying to reboot the franchise, and sex it up a bit. (Mai = ChiChi? Probably.)
Read Watchmen.
I OWN League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, bitchez, and proud of it - Peta Wilson was BORN to play a redheaded vampire babe in Tight Pants.
~
I wish I had the time to read every comic book mentioned in this thread. I'd use that time doing any other thing though. The point is, read Watchmen or die.
Dragonball looks like shit, but I gave up on it long ago. The animated series was a lot of fun, but as dumb as a video game, so there was no way they could have done it right.
And by the way, fuck manga.
Posted by: JC at October 27, 2008 1:13 AM
Peta Wilson was BORN to play a redheaded vampire babe in Tight Pants.
And no offense, V, but I don't think this is gonna break the video-game adaptation losing streak.
I am only doing this because it is early, and I don't want my geek cred besmirched:
1) Dragonball is actually a pretty massive media empire built on the anime of the same name. Based on Journey to the West, it has spawned sequels, animated movies (theatrical and video), toys, and yes, video games. But it is not in and of itself just a video game.
So it is a shitty ANIME adaptation. not a shitty video game adaptation.
2) I never said it was going to be any good. This is that stupid Tom Brady/Peyton Manning/Who gives a shit football joke during my "Comebacks" review all over again.
I assure you good people that it is just as crappy to me as it is to any of you.
Sheesh. It is too goddamn early for geeking out like this.