free counter with statistics Was Your Pajiba Drunk? | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

rogenisting.JPG

Was Your Pajiba Drunk?

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | July 24, 2007 | Comments (51)


Oh, fuck it: I made a first pass at this round up in a tone meant to exude a certain amount of give-a-shit, but the truth is, I’m tired. Thanks to “Life” (which keeps getting in my goddamn way) I’m way behind on Harry Potter; I’m cranky as fuck; and I just want to get through this round-up so I can get back to what matters: Finding out how Deathly Hallows ends. And for those of you itching to talk about the book with fellow Pajibans, the review should be along very soon.

Until then, you’re going to have to put up with this half-assed round up, starting with this: There will be an adaptation of The Green Hornet. And the truth is, I hate comic-book adaptations (the occasional Batman or Spiderman flick notwithstanding), but if I were in any sort of mood to give a damn about the future of Hollywood right now, I’d tell you I was excited about this project. Not because I care about the comic-book superhero (and yes! I know it started out as a radio program; screw off, you don’t think we get Wikipedia in upstate NY?) but because for the first time ever in a movie not called Mystery Men, a comic-book hero might be played by someone with an actual sense of humor. Indeed, the hairy-ass wonder of the Apatow World, Seth Rogen, is set to write and star in The Green Hornet, about Britt Reid, a newspaper publisher by day and masked crime-fighting vigilante by night. I’m not sure how Green Hornet purists feel about having a comedic actor take on this role, but since there are only four of you, I don’t give a shit. I’m pretty thrilled to see a schlub put on a costume and kick some ass, if you wanna know the truth. And guess who Rogen wants to play his sidekick, Kato? Stephen Chow, y’all. The director/star of the rocking Kung Fu Hustle. That’s one of the ugliest pairings I can possibly imagine, and yet I find the whole thing strangely intriguing. I mean, I would, were it not for the fact that continuing not to give a shit is the theme of this round up.

Moving along, but sticking with comic-book crap, a director has now been attached to the long-gestating Wolverine spin-off, starring Hugh Jackman. Gavin Hood will take the helm. And if you haven’t heard of Hood, well, that doesn’t actually make you an idiot or anything. He directed a movie called Tsotsi, which garnered him as Oscar for Best Foreign Language Directing. It’s a damn fine flick, but if I hadn’t reviewed it, I’d have never heard of Hood, either. Of course, Wolverine is still a comic-book character, and since I don’t give a shit about them, I can’t muster any enthusiasm for this project, the script of which was written by David Benioff (25th Hour, Troy). I understand that Mr. Jackman tingles many of your nether regions, but claws or not, he doesn’t do much for me; he’s got the all the debonairness of an ’80s television detective.

Finally, because I’m feeling awfully masochistic this morning, let’s make this a comic-book hat trick: There will be a sequel to The Punisher. However, the original Punisher, Thomas Jane (who was the bomb in Stander, yo!) won’t be reprising the role. Instead, Ray Stevenson (not to be confused with Ray Stevens, author of such hits as “It’s Me Again, Margaret,” and “Mississippi Squirrel Revival) will be taking over the role — he’s probably familiar to many of you as Titus Pollo in HBO’s “Rome.” The villain in the sequel will be Jigsaw, though the role has not yet been cast.

Jesus, don’t get too excited or anything.

On DVD this week, check out The Host, Zodiac, and The Wind that Shakes the Barley and don’t check out The Number 23, Slow Burn, or Perfume — The Story of a Murderer.

Informal poll: How many heterosexual men out there, besides socalledcousins, are willing to confess to a fondness for Jane Austen? Because, in the trailer watch, I am no more interested in costume dramas adapted from Jane Austen novels than I am in costume dramas about Jane Austen. That’s because I’m straight. And here is the trailer for Becoming Jane?


Pajiba Love 07/23/07 | Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows



Comments

Sorry dude, but Dolph Lundgren was the Punisher *years* before Thomas Jane.

Regardless of the actor, I felt more punished by the end of those movies than the villains did.

Russell
(why didn't Travolta just have Xenu whoop T-Jane's ass?)

Posted by: Russell at July 24, 2007 10:01 AM

Dang, Dustin, how'd ya let little things like a new baby and your job get in the way of finishing a Harry Potter book?

Posted by: Kolby at July 24, 2007 10:03 AM

So the big deal about Jane Austen was that she didn't want to be a gold digger? Because that is what the trailer seems to be saying.

I am a bit disappointed that Jane won't be coming back. I actually liked his Punisher, mostly because he played him more as a soldier than as a nutcase with a lot of guns (being in Stander obviously helped). And how can you top taking out the entire family at a reunion? That has to be the pinnacle of retaliation in action movies.

Posted by: Vermillion at July 24, 2007 10:23 AM

Finding out Thomas Jane was off Punisher 2 actually ruined my whole day. His Punisher is definitely one of my guilty pleasures. I looked around and saw he chose to leave after disagreeing with the way the movie was going. I guess I can respect that, but as much as I loved Titus Pullo I won't be able to bring myself to see Punisher 2 when it comes out.

Posted by: Patrick at July 24, 2007 10:39 AM

Dustin, I'm with you on comic book adaptations. Unless they're by Chris Nolan starring Christian Bale. Those guys, right now, can do no wrong. (And I do have a fondness for Superman.) Actually, I shouldn't say I hate comic book adaptations so much as I'm tired of them. Do we really need a movie about every goddamned superhero in the comics ever? I mean, another Punisher movie? Did anyone SEE the last one? (Why, Titus Pullo? WHY!?!?!?!?!) (Ray Stevenson must have boat payments to make...) The Green Hornet? Does anyone remember that character? I mean....why?

As to Harry Potter: he gets colon cancer and dies at the end. The last four chapters are a heartbreaking chronicle of Harry's last weeks in the Hogwarts infirmary, saying goodbye to his friends and taking stock of his all too brief life. It's truly stunning.

COME ON! Another character I'm sick of! Go read a real book!

(Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll go take my meds.)

Posted by: Armando at July 24, 2007 10:47 AM

Hey Dustin, when is the little Pajiblet gonna put up his first review? I mean, you gotta make the little ankle biter earn his keep somehow, right?

Posted by: Manny at July 24, 2007 10:49 AM

Sorry to hoard the comments, but I want to say that, really, read anything you want. I don't get into fantasy literature, so Harry Potter has never appealed to me, but I hear those books are quite entertaining (and anything that gets kids reading is all right in my book). I just had to vent after that disappointing roundup (Ray Stevenson? In a Punisher sequel? REALLY?).

Really, I should just go back to not giving a shit too.

Just keep that in mind before all you Potter fans, whatever your communal name for each other is, start throwing vitriol my way. Please.

Posted by: Armando at July 24, 2007 10:51 AM

Shame Tom Jane isn't sticking around for The Punisher 2, even if the first one blew anyway. I seem to check out everything he's in, regardless of suckage... I think this is because he looks a bit like Christopher Lambert, who is the only person cooler than Tom Jane (one must concede that if Tom Jane could do that French cackle thing he'd be unstoppable, cool-wise).

Posted by: Craig at July 24, 2007 10:52 AM

Someone is cranky this morning. Sounds like you need a nap and a warm beverage. I won't spoil it for you...but Harry...

Posted by: anikitty at July 24, 2007 10:58 AM

Ruining any credibility I had: I think Mystery Men is one of the more underrated movies of the last 10 years.

Posted by: Seth L at July 24, 2007 11:36 AM

Hermione gets pregnant at the end with Voldemort's baby. (sigh) I knew I shouldn't have spoiled it for you...

I'd be all about 'Becoming Jane' if there was any remote historical truth to it. But... blech, away with you, Anne Hathaway.

Posted by: shyestviolet at July 24, 2007 11:50 AM

It's weird. I have no interest in Hugh Jackman in any role exept as Wolverine. Then I get all hot for him. Something to do with hormones?

Posted by: lizzy at July 24, 2007 11:53 AM

I love Mystery Men as do my ankle biters. You do seem to be suffering from a little sleep deprivation and I don't blame you for being pissy over crappy roundup news like this.

Posted by: bebemiqui at July 24, 2007 11:57 AM

Not to worry, Armando, all the rabid Potter fans are too busy not reading Chez to worry about you.

Posted by: JulieD at July 24, 2007 12:11 PM

Anne Hathaway's accent in that trailer is HORRENDOUS. They could have at least cast a British actress in the role. But James McAvoy? Yummy.

Posted by: Kristina at July 24, 2007 12:12 PM

Y'know, I got all crazy over Harry Potter in the beginning, but stopped reading after the third book. The movies were gaining so much hype and IMO, the first film was the best and the others were ok. I lost interest. I'll read the final one after I read the other 3.

No Thomas Jane for Punisher 2? Damn!

Posted by: Brie at July 24, 2007 12:24 PM

Oh, not only is Becoming Jane completely inaccurate, but it's supposed to be boring as hell even for those of us who like Austen. I won't be seeing it for the 'she needed a man to inspire her' theme, but I doubt I'll be missing anything.

Posted by: Karyn at July 24, 2007 12:29 PM

FUCK NO!
did you somehow follow me? jesus christ, i've seent that stupid motherfucking trailer 5 times in 2 days. i saw all these indie and foreign films ,and for some reason, they all kept playing that stupid trailer at the beginning. i hate you jane, i hate you frilly puffy shirt guy, and i hate you james cromwell(no i don't).

i needed to vent

Posted by: MAx at July 24, 2007 12:33 PM

James McAvoy. LE SIGH. Sexy Mr. Tumnus!!!

Posted by: redbeaniegirl at July 24, 2007 12:42 PM

p.s. Stander rocks my world, But Tom Jane on Arrested Development playing Tom Jane was my absolute favorite.

Posted by: redbeaniegirl at July 24, 2007 12:44 PM

I will confess that i can enjoy Jane- IN WRITEN FORM. I wouldn't wish any of the films/adaptations I have seen on my worst enemies. They all seem to miss the point that allows me to tolerate and enjoy the books. She rips on the culture that she is describing and presents its flaws to be savaged by an intelligent reader. These books shouldn't be read as romantic female fantasies but scathing reviews of a earlier era.

Posted by: Eric at July 24, 2007 12:46 PM

As a heterosexual female I've always felt like I was missing out by being totally uninterested in Jane Austen. So much so that I read the books AND watched the movies, just sort of hoping that I'd get struck with a lightning bolt of girliness and collapse under the weight of all that longing and romance.
Alas, it never came.
For me it's always been the frustrating equivalent of listening to the most annoying girls you know complaining about their boyfriends/lack thereof, and I just can't take it.

Posted by: missmle at July 24, 2007 12:47 PM

DUSTIN!!!! I can't believe you showed NO love for the release of Mother-fuckin 'Monster Squad'! Who else, other than me will be picking this up very soon?

And Harry Potter gets a sex change and runs off with Voldemort to open a chihuahua farm. Ginny and Hermione realize some hot schoolgirl stuff and get into the girl/girl thing. Neville joins in. Ron videos. Best ending yet.

Posted by: PissBoy at July 24, 2007 12:53 PM

[Hank Kingsley voice]: Hey now ... that list is called the "If I Had to" list for a reason ... and Titus Pullo is on it, baby. Mmmm, punish me, big boy.

That said, Anne Hathaway is one of those pretty, empty-ish people, like Jessica Alba or Josh Hartnett, who were put on Earth for one reason -- and it ain't acting.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 24, 2007 12:53 PM

hehe...Mr. Tumnus gets him a piece of ol' Miss Jane.

Posted by: PissBoy at July 24, 2007 12:57 PM

I was asked to read the Harry Potter books by a friend when there were only five out. I gave up pretty early in the fourth one (and it took a while to get there, so tedious. Dang, I read Ulysses faster), when it turned out she was going to pull out the SAME COCKING-FUCKING PLOT AGAIN! I keep hearing that the actual story hasn't started at this point, well Joanna, how many g**damn mulligans do you need to actually start a story? Astro-fuck! Now I know that all of the H.P. acolytes are going to be chanting for my blood, I'll live with it. You can say whatever you want to me, because I've heard it all already. The books are not entertaining to me, I don't find them good, they are overhyped dross. Yes better this than CHUCK AND LARRY, but are those our only choices?

And it's pretty mind-blowing that J.K. Boring (who has gotten WAAAAAAAAAY too big for her britches, has anybody else seen that 'Boston Tea Party' remark? Cunt, please!) has made 100 million dollars this weekend. So I'm sorry to everybody who loves these books, if you like them, fine, I'm not mad at you. But don't ask me to give them another chance, I won't do it. I'm only five feet tall, so if somebody hands me another one of these books, I'm just going to stand on it to reach a book that isn't recycled horseshit. Okay, I've said my piece, hand me my cigarette and blindfold.

I guess that was 'scathing and bitchy'. Sorry guys, end rant.

Posted by: M at July 24, 2007 1:03 PM

Oh yeah, and just because your name is 'Anne Hathaway', it doesn't mean you're automatically British. Good call on the stunt-naming of your baby though, mister and missus. Not a stupid move at all. Feh, I'm in a bad mood, I have to babysit tonight, I'm not sleeping well and my neck is swollen. Sorry again.

Posted by: M at July 24, 2007 1:08 PM

Dustin, whilst reciting today's DVD releases I was shocked and appalled that you did not mention the 20th Anniversary Edition (only edition) of Monster Squad. Come on man, don't tell me you've never had the good graces of viewing the most overlooked and underrated film of our generation?

Posted by: ian at July 24, 2007 1:09 PM

Potter what? I'm too busy cabbage patching with joy over the faint possibility of more Stephen Chow in my life.

Posted by: Melicious at July 24, 2007 1:31 PM

Okay, first of all, Mr. PaddyDog will love you forever for the Austen/hetero male dig.

I'm an Austen girl, no shame about it either although I really hate the people who don't get her enough to understand that Bridget Jones' Diary was not an homage or a clever modernization. It was just a bowl of santorum shoved in our faces (google the definition of santorum if you're not keeping up here).
As others have noted, this trailer indicates that the film bears very little resemblance to her actual life (having read three well-researched biographies, I believe I am in a position to say this).
If the trailer reflects the film, then it's aimed at the aforementioned Bridget Jones cluster of girlies.
On the other hand: Maggie. Smith. She is President Emeritus of the Jane Austen Society. Would she lower herself to this if it didn't have some merit?
Anyway, I'll probably see it just to punish Mr. PaddyDog for some offense he's bound to commit in the next few weeks: maybe leaving the toilet seat up would do it.
However, the big question on this one is WWRD: What would Ranylt do?

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 24, 2007 1:52 PM

Good question, PaddyDog, WWRD?

Sense and Sensibility seems strong to me and still holds up; I ache for Emma Thompson's character every time I watch it. Colin Firth was, as I understand it, the defining Darcy of our time. Contra: Anything with Gwyneth; any modernizations involving cloying stains like Alicia Silverstone. (And, yes, I know I'm not part of the poll. It's discrimination, man.)

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 24, 2007 2:56 PM

Socalledonlycousins: Absolutely the P&P mini series with Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehles was a truly loyal adaptation which succeeded in conveying all of the burning sexuality that I first read in the book (at age 12) without even one era-inappropriate lip-on-lip kiss.
S&S was good in spite of the exceptional mis-casting of Hugh Grant (hate), plus any film that puts Hugh Laurie and Alan Rickman on the screen for me at the same time can do no wrong.
Now watch Ranylt rip apart everything I've said.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 24, 2007 3:14 PM

Good Lord. Is it not yet time to move on to a discussion of the Bronte sisters' canon? Wake me up when class is over.

Posted by: JP at July 24, 2007 3:40 PM

Persuasion. Ciaran Hinds as Captain Wentworth (the man is NOT russian. . .though you wouldn't know it based one his past few films), Amanda Root as the non-starlet Austen heroine. Truly a LOVELY adaptation of my favorite Austen novel.

Posted by: redbeaniegirl at July 24, 2007 3:42 PM

Jane Austen, who fucking cares. Apparently since I lack a Y-chromosome I'm supposed to revere her above all others and get tingly with joy whenever one of her craptacular works gets any sort of attention. Whatever, I don't think I could have less interest if I actively tried.

Posted by: Telis at July 24, 2007 4:14 PM

How refreshing to see that other women dislike Austen. Thank god. As an English teacher, I have been taught to revere her works like a gift from the lord. What the fuck ever.

Posted by: tawnia at July 24, 2007 6:54 PM

hang on, a trailer for Becoming Jane? wha...? That movie has been and gone here...Don't think I missed anything either...would be the only movies we get in Australia BEFORE the US would be the crap ones...

Here's a concept for you - screw Anne Hathaway, and actually get, oh, I don't know, SOMEONE ENGLISH? There's plenty of far more talented English actresses out there...

Posted by: rach at July 24, 2007 8:31 PM

Ah, Ray Stevenson, how I long to see you kick ass on the big screen. However, the "crap flick" warning is going off in my head, so unless convinced otherwise by scores of good reviews, I'm going to skip Punisher 2.

And as a heterosexual female, I have a strong revulsion toward any Austen. I wanted to sock Elizabeth Barnett right in the mouth for being such a stand-offish bitch and find Mr. Darcy a real woman. That being said, I saw this trailer before Away From Her last weekend and thought it looked adorable, mainly because of James "I'm completely human this time" McAvoy. Matched with Maggie Smith and James Cromwell, it's the hat trick of people I long to hear talk in elevated accents while wearing puffy clothing and shoes with buckles.

Posted by: Hannah at July 24, 2007 9:09 PM

congratulations anne hathaway on having possibly the worst british accent ever in a movie. she has a spot at the top next to don cheadle for his terrible cockney accent in ocean's 11 through 13 and (even though i loved this movie, and her in it) natalie portman's accent in v for vendetta.

anne hathaway is one of those actors i find terribly insufferable, like emmy rossum and hayden panetierre (or however the hell you spell it).

Posted by: citizen_cris at July 24, 2007 10:37 PM

"Not to worry, Armando, all the rabid Potter fans are too busy not reading Chez to worry about you."

Whew! Thanks for the heads up, Julie. Although I think my colon cancer idea would've made a more believable ending. (Hence why I don't make my living as a fantasy writer!)

Posted by: Armando at July 25, 2007 12:23 AM

I will always love Kate Beckinsale for her version of Emma (pre-Gwyneth or Alicia). That woman was meant for BBC miniseries, not blockbusters and plastic vampire fangs!

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at July 25, 2007 12:54 AM

Straight man and reader of Jane Austen novels right here.

But my wife does write an Eng Lit essay blog on Austen novels, so there's that. And she hates this film already without having seen it. It's bullshit and not a biography, just cashing in on Austen's name.

Shame that men are getting put off a great and historically important author by a bunch of crap, corset, romantic comedies that can't for one second convey the depth of the novels.

Posted by: Jamieson at July 25, 2007 4:54 AM

God. I just want to take Becoming Jane and rip it's stupid head off and punch it in the face.

Firstly, it's fictitious and can we stop altering history to cash in? It's History. There are facts. You shouldn't be allowed to fuck with them.

Secondly, don't be deceived by Maggie Smith's presence. She was in First Wives' Club, after all. It looks terrible, contrived, badly written and with lukewarm performances.

It just..it gives me a headache and I want it to die.

Posted by: Rebecca H. at July 25, 2007 5:13 AM

I have inhaled these books and am an active member in fandom. While this book ultimately achieved what the last book in the series was meant to achieve, maintaining Harry's innocence, while fulfilling of the prophecy and NOT killing Voldemort (vanquishing him with a paltry spell), the book, IMO, was tired. The contrivances were endless, as she tries to marshal the trio from plot point to plot point. I'm not going to list them here, this is not the place, but in several key instances I wondered if Harry had taken stupid pills. The book succeeds as the final installment of the concept, but it fails utterly as a book.

Posted by: Claire at July 25, 2007 2:25 PM

Ya know, I kept reading "Hathaway" but kept thinking "Heche." Which made for a very weird spin on the Austin before I watched the trailer.

Posted by: lunabelle at July 25, 2007 3:22 PM

Rebecca H., what's wrong with The First Wives Club?

Posted by: Hannah at July 26, 2007 12:07 AM

"Mystery Men" blew big time. It was stodgy and obivious from the first frame to the last.

If a comic book movie with a sense of humor is what you want watch "The Incredibles." It's humorous without being condescending, poignant without any a hint of mawkishness. Granted it is animated but it's "witty" enough to amuse the "high brow" set while at the same time delves into comic book lore to keep aficionados enthralled.

Not to keen on Rogen as the Green Hornet but paired with Chow it could be very interesting. Still there might be the chance that the film could be like many other adaptations of pulp TV material with all the urgency sapped out of the work with only an adumbration of wit stuck in its place. "The Dukes of Hazard" and "Starsky and Hutch" come to mind as prime examples of adventure/action television adapted for the big screen just for laughs and nothing else. "Miami Vice" to me seemed to be the exception to the rule
and was better for it.

Finally I love Stevensen as The Punisher. Not built like Jane but certainly wields the heft to give a visceral performance as Frank Castle. Kevin Nash ain't gonna push him around.

Posted by: Mr. West at July 28, 2007 9:58 AM

"Mystery Men" blew big time. It was stodgy and obivious from the first frame to the last.

If a comic book movie with a sense of humor is what you want watch "The Incredibles." It's humorous without being condescending, poignant without any a hint of mawkishness. Granted it is animated but it's "witty" enough to amuse the "high brow" set while at the same time delves into comic book lore to keep aficionados enthralled.

Not to keen on Rogen as the Green Hornet but paired with Chow it could be very interesting. Still there might be the chance that the film could be like many other adaptations of pulp TV material with all the urgency sapped out of the work with only an adumbration of wit stuck in its place. "The Dukes of Hazard" and "Starsky and Hutch" come to mind as prime examples of adventure/action television adapted for the big screen just for laughs and nothing else. "Miami Vice" to me seemed to be the exception to the rule
and was better for it.

Finally I love Stevensen as The Punisher. Not built like Jane but certainly wields the heft to give a visceral performance as Frank Castle. Kevin Nash ain't gonna push him around.

Posted by: Mr. West at July 28, 2007 9:59 AM

Uh, nice accent Miss Hathaway.
James Macavoy deserves so much better.
Ugh.

Posted by: Gabrielle at July 28, 2007 12:50 PM

Sheesh, lots of overeaction to Anne Hathaway-she was pretty good in Brokeback Mountain. I mean, she is definitely not the most riveting example of female acting but I would say she is at least..."credible"? I would have never thought to have much of an opinion of her until I read some of the responses to this column-does she sacrifice little babies to Satan or something besides trying to have a film career?

Posted by: fatpat at July 28, 2007 10:43 PM

Why the Austen hate? Why??

People, she was a woman writing about current affairs in a time when women weren't supposed to do much else beyond snag the richest man they could, then shut up for the rest of their lives. She at least had the guts to point out the hypocritical truths about the plight of middle class women.

And frankly, if you can find other female authors of the time that do better justice to that theme, I'd like to hear it. Because that general time frame is all about Bronte and Austen, at least as far as my high school curriculum was concerned.

I LOVE Austen, she created the sort of intelligent, spirited and lovable women I wanted be as when I grew up.
Dear lord, I practically had a shrine to Lizzie (and Anne Shirley) growing up.

That aside, S&S was ridiculous, for all that it had some good actors in it. A&E's P&P was *the* definitive adaptation for the screen, large or small. And although I expected to loathe (loathe I tell you!) the latest P&P, watching Mr McFayden stroll across a dew laden field.... be still my beating heart! oh dear.... now where's that dvd?...

Posted by: Stella at August 16, 2007 10:21 PM