blogspot
visitor
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy Movie | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

3661966081_2b57ef4527.jpg
Eeeny, Meeny, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy


You Are Not It / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | July 10, 2009 | Comments (36)


I guess after Matt Reeves decided to make an American remake of Let the Right One In, the Swedish director of the original decided he, too, could get in the remake game. Thomas Alfredson has signed on to his next project, a big-screen remake of Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, a 1970s British television series based on John Le Carre’s cold war best-seller. The movie, set during the cold war, will be about spy-hunt within the highest echelons of the British Secret Intelligence Service.

Has anyone read the book or seen the series? I actually received the entire series as a Christmas gift from an in-law a couple of years ago, but I never got around to watching it. I couldn’t tell you why, although Mrs. Pajiba-hyphenate watched it and dug the living hell out of it. Then again, she’s far more sophisticated than I. I was dissuaded by the DVD box cover, because that’s just how shallow I can be. Alec Guiness doesn’t do a lot for me, either. It looked like the kind of mini-series made for people who love Poirot, and I freakin’ hate Poirot. Who’s with me?

Oh, go screw.


Hangover Cast Casting News | Mel Gibson Circling the Beaver





Comments

'Poirot' was great.

So what's your point?

Posted by: OldSchool60 at July 10, 2009 10:04 AM

I was always kind of tickled that I share the same last name as another famous TV detective, though I never watched the show.

Posted by: Snath at July 10, 2009 10:05 AM

Nope, never seen. Never gonna.

Wait, isn't Guiness a beer? Did he make the beer? Then I'd be interested.

But still wouldn't watch it.

Posted by: Xtreme at July 10, 2009 10:10 AM

Cannon?

Well, my namesake was hanged for treason. You win.

Posted by: Jay at July 10, 2009 10:11 AM

No, but Guinness is. Sir Alec was English though.

Posted by: Jay at July 10, 2009 10:13 AM

You don't like Alec Guinness or Poirot????

For how many years now have I been investing my emotions in an Overlord who turns out to be all just fuzzy bits behind the curtain?

Of course this puts that Ryan Reynolds worship into perspective. Poirot doesn't have abs (but he's not cross-eyed).

But Holy God! Have you ever seen Bridge on the River Kwai? or the Ealing Comedies?

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 10, 2009 10:20 AM

"Alec Guiness doesn’t do a lot for me.."


Wow, just, wow. You say you are into movies?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 10, 2009 10:20 AM

He's more machine now than man.

Posted by: Jay at July 10, 2009 10:28 AM

For how many years now have I been investing my emotions in an Overlord who turns out to be all just fuzzy bits behind the curtain?

I just had a seriously funny mental image of Dustin peeking out.

I haven't seen the original, but I do like Mr. G.

Posted by: Cindy at July 10, 2009 10:31 AM

Yeah because Guiness is such an amateur... compared to... compared to...
whom?

Posted by: missh at July 10, 2009 10:32 AM

has that online arab dating ad always been there?

"connecting arabs worldwide"


so THAT'S how they hook-up.
just like regular people.

*ponders*

Posted by: gp at July 10, 2009 10:35 AM

....compared to RyRey.

Posted by: Stacy D at July 10, 2009 10:36 AM

Ah, come now, PaddyDog. There are plenty of intellectuals on the site. I'm just not one of them. I'm the populist. I drink light beers. I did love Bridge on the River Kwai, though. But "Poirot"? Egads. It's high-brow formulaic comfort food with bad production values, which obscures the mundane, predictable simplicity behind the plot lines. "Poirot," which runs in my house 12 goddamn hours a week thanks to Mrs. P-h, looks and feels a lot smarter than it actually is.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at July 10, 2009 10:37 AM

This reminds me of that one time I strangled a hooker in Roppongi. No more Chu-Hi's for me!

Seriously, this was the most boring and pointless post in recent Pajiba history. A fucking Poirot knockoff?!

Let me know when this horrendous piece of recycled dogshit hits the theaters so I can ignore the everloving bejesus out of it.

Posted by: Kballs at July 10, 2009 10:43 AM

A fucking Poirot knockoff?!

That's...not exactly what's happening. It's about the British.

Posted by: Jay at July 10, 2009 10:50 AM

But Poirot is not really about the plot these days (remember when Poirot and Miss Marple were written these were ingenious plots that hadn't been over-used a million times). The beauty of David Suchet's Poirot is that they infuse the production with the petty vices, vanities and irritations that permeate families and little villages.

Besides, the women wear hats and everyone lives in beautiful houses. No sub-divisions in Poirot!

If Mrs. Pajiba-hyphenate ever needs a break, she can lounge on my sofa and soak up period mysteries all day long. I'll serve Pimms and cucumber sandwiches.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 10, 2009 10:51 AM

I just re-read the comments:

Snath Poirot?

Is it possible?

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 10, 2009 10:55 AM

No PaddyDog, a different famous inspector. From Oxford.

Posted by: Snath at July 10, 2009 11:00 AM

Snath Morse?

Beautiful! Do you drive a vintage Jaguar and obssess over the Times' crossword? I may be in love.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 10, 2009 11:03 AM

No, but I do love beer.

Posted by: Snath at July 10, 2009 11:08 AM

Snath Smart?
Snath Friday?
No. Too easy and too old. Maybe a little off the wall?
Snath Mannix!
Snath Magnum!
Snath Shaft!
Not likely, unless you went and changed your name to something completely fucking awesome. What about old school?
Snath Christie?
Snath McGarrett?
Possibly. But the '80s is where I'm placing my bet:
Snath Steele!
Snath Drebbin!
Snath Tubbs!
Snath Hammer!
Wait. What am I doing? It's so obvious!
Snath Mars.

Posted by: Kballs at July 10, 2009 11:38 AM

Dammit! Took too long researching my post and now the jig is up!

I'd still change my name to Snath Steele. All your dreams would come true.

Snath Steele: "Suck my dick, stranger!"
Stranger: "Yes sir!"

Snath Steele: "Gimme that goddamned sandwich!"
Man with sandwich: "Here you go!"

Snath Steele: "Jump in front of that bus!"
Spencer Pratt: "Okey-dokey!"

See?

Posted by: Kballs at July 10, 2009 11:46 AM

If Sir Alec "doesn't do a lot" for you, then you should move over to TMZ or somewhere suited to your profound ignorance.

Posted by: jaf at July 10, 2009 12:14 PM

Dude. He should totally be Snath Hammer.

Posted by: figgy at July 10, 2009 1:44 PM

How about Snath Holmes? It's got that classy sound, no? Maybe then I could be Xtreme Watson, loyal sidekick, trusted companion?

Finally, a sidekick gig! I've always wanted one of those!

Posted by: Xtreme at July 10, 2009 1:59 PM

Sigh. Le Carre is fricken great. Especially when you're a book hound and all you've got is the massive flea market collection of an elderly old man who is searching for the post-Bond sweet spot.

Out of about five hundred books read, Le Carre's were the only ones I kept for my collection. I never saw the series though.

I think George Smiley will be a hard sell though - an older, portly, fastidious, 'retired' guy is called back to the fray - a very dense, detailed, intriguing network of spycraft, code words and secret politics. A lot of it is George Smiley sorting sh*t out and finding the rat 'cause he's smart, but at least it is interspersed with action pieces and character studies and yea drama. He's a British priss though, albeit nice and scathing. The best comparison would be like the modern 'M', only male.

The hard sell would be all the cold war stuff - it isn't playing so well to today's youth obsessed culture...although if you cast the right supporting characters it might do. In fact, if you 'hot' it up and do a Daniel Craig level on the casting it'd be like Ocean's Eleven for smart people.

SPOILER>>
I also think he's got a wealth of great material to make a franchise out of previously ruined adaptations. Tailor of Panama, for example, is the only story I've read that spends so much time on a total hoax and still makes for an excellent read.
spoiler end>>


It's all about casting then. I dunno if this guy has the pull to make a big deal out of it all, but if he can do one thing right, I say give him another chance with under-utilized source material.

Posted by: replica at July 10, 2009 2:18 PM

I went through a Le Carre phase in high school (I blame my dad), and I'm actually kind of excited for this as long as it is not as horribly miscast as the miniseries was. Smiley is supposed to be dumpy and unremarkable, which is the exact opposite of Alec Guiness. It would be like having Brad Pitt play the part. They need to get someone who has negative charisma.

And it is NOTHING like Poirot, so you can end that comparison right now. There are no daring adventures, no film-noir women, no jumping to brilliant conclusions, it's just a bunch of depressed MI-6 agents during the Cold War. And it is amazing.

(I'm protective of my love of Le Carre books, can you tell?)

Posted by: Claire at July 10, 2009 2:19 PM

I find it really depressing how many comments it took for Le Carre's name to even get mentioned. He is the absolute master - if any of his work makes for an imperfect adaptation, the fault lies with the adapters.

Posted by: S.K. at July 10, 2009 2:55 PM

Another thought - I just realized I'm old now. If you make it 'retro' and give it a greyish patina from the olden times of the 80's...well, you could embellish it like I suggested and sell it to the youts of today.

Posted by: replica at July 10, 2009 3:39 PM

a fucking Poirot knock-off?

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy has nothing to do with murder mysteries. It has nothing to do with Poirot. Please disassociate these two entities in your mind. They were only connected by DR and need to be unconnected now.

And Claire, I would have to respectfully disagree and say that the miniseries is fucking brilliantly cast, with two masters, Alec Guinness and Ian Richardson, as George Smiley and Bill Hayden. Guinness brings subtlety and a sense of unknowable, hidden depth of mind to the role which is exactly what Smiley should have. i can't put into words how plain fucking great this series is, and even if you're pretending to be a populist who hates 'smartpeoplestuff' like DR, you should definitely watch it.

That said, I bet the movie's going to suck the sweaty balls of Michael Bay. At least, that's what I'm telling myself.

I'm going with the "My expectations are so low anything's an improvement" school of Hollywood Movie Survival.

Posted by: igor at July 10, 2009 8:15 PM

We must agree to disagree, igor. I think it doesn't help that my first Le Carre screen adaptation was Constant Gardner first and thought it was so beautifully cast that all others would end up being failures in my mind.

I really look forward to dream casting the movie.

Posted by: claire at July 10, 2009 8:56 PM

@Claire
I haven't actually seen Constant Gardner, but maybe I'll give it a go now.
Who would be your ideal Smiley if not Guinness?

You have to agree though that Peter Guillam and Ricky Tarr were both excellently acted.

Posted by: igor at July 10, 2009 9:48 PM

Igor, definitely see Constant Gardener. Every time a new character walked on screen you knew right away who it was. All of the actors carried themselves very well.

I think my ideal Smiley would have been some unknown (which makes a harder sell, but you can always get the star power with supporting characters). What I love about Smiley is that he's nondescript and that's what makes him good at his job. If you get anyone too famous in there, it clouds the character, no matter how good they are.

I will agree with you on that. I'm interested to see who they'd get to play Guillam in this.

Posted by: Claire at July 10, 2009 10:26 PM

Whoa, why so much Poirot talk when it's a Le Carre remake?

The book is pretty satisfying, all in all. I find Le Carre an awfully enjoyable novelist, and he steers clear, for the most part, of being either formulaic or overwrought, the two big pitfalls in genre fiction like that. I don't love the miniseries--Guinness is fine, but the whole thing was kinda forgettable--but the book is good stuff. Le Carre's spies are almost always more bureaucrats than supermen, and so his best stories are a good, slow burn rather than a bunch of chase scenes loosely strung together.

But I will echo the recommendation of Constant Gardener--both the book and the movie, honestly.

Posted by: Lils at July 11, 2009 1:46 AM

The awesome thing about Tinker, Tailor is that at some point (maybe the fifth read?) you realize that it is a book entirely composed of conversations and yet it is so AMAZINGLY tense that you're on the edge of your seat the entire time. (Okay, so some of the conversations are about shoutouts. Still.) Plus, it's beautifully written -- Smiley is just a wonderful character.

I'm a little biased towards the miniseries because I came at LeCarre in kind of a roundabout way -- I saw Smiley's People, then read Smiley's People, then read Tinker, Tailor, then saw Tinker, Tailor. So my image of Smiley has always been informed by Alec Guinness, and I think he does a really good job of sinking into the role. Then again, LeCarre was so impressed by Guiness's portrayal in the Tinker, Tailor miniseries that he says that Smiley and Guinness merged in his mind, and he actually wrote Smiley's People with Guiness in mind.

And yeah, totally agree with Lils. The books are way more tense than the miniseries, but the miniseries is fun if you've read the books. I am tentatively excited about the big screen adaptation, as long as they keep the slow burning nature of the plot and don't make it all boom and bang.

Posted by: Becca at July 11, 2009 6:04 AM

Aaaaaaand by "shoutouts" I of course mean "shootouts". Oy.

Posted by: Becca at July 11, 2009 6:06 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.