web
counter
 

Why We Drink: Terry Gilliam Remake Edition

By TK and Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (32)



tumblr_ldyjnzwWZo1qewh72o1_500.jpg

What I find most remarkable is this: This news comes from Variety, wherein they were announcing that Guy Collins and Michael Ryan were adapting 1980 movie “The Long Good Friday” into a TV series. Then they casually threw this out there:

Collins and Ryan are also pushing ahead with a “Time Bandits” reboot and are in talks with a Hollywood co-producer to redo the Terry Gilliam pic as a bigscreen kids action franchise.

If that isn’t burying the lede, then mother of God, what the hell is?

Because of course, the first thing we think of when we meditate upon a dark fantasy involving time traveling dwarves, the Supreme Being, the incarnation of all evil, and the inevitable flaws in a designed creation is not the tension between free will and fate in a clockwork universe, but upon the story’s potential as an action tent pole for the same kids who won’t get the hell off of our respective lawns. Yes, there are rumors wafting out of the bowl suggesting that Collins and Ryan are having meetings and such in order to reboot Time Bandits into a kids action franchise. You can check them out on IMDB if you’d like to be impressed by just how many mediocre movies you’ve never heard of can be compiled into one list.

But seriously, kids action franchise, that’s not going to lead to any changes to the spirit of the original film. The gut punch ending is steeped in the bottomless nihilism of realizing that not only is the universe run by a dictator, but that he’s a spiteful asshole who might just set up a fantastic Rube Goldberg plan to defeat his enemy that includes murdering your parents as a footnote. Oh, they’ll totally keep that ending, it just sets up a feel good second movie perfectly.

Honestly, despite our bitching for your benefit, we have few sacred cows when it comes to film. I’ve grown so used to the unrelenting rampage of remakes that I can’t tell where the alcohol-induced numbness starts and where the jaded cinematic malaise ends. Sometimes, they are one and the same. Yet despite that, Gilliam is about as close as it gets to untouchable. What’s next? Brazil turned into a romantic comedy? (oh, right. The “Love Conquers All” ending. Never mind) Baron Munchausen turned into breezy animated fare with voice talent by the cast of High School Musical? Twelve Monkeys redone with Cole as an angst-ridden tween? No, no. Fuck it. Let’s just burn the entire “Monty Python” inventory and replace it with sketches produced by the guys who inflicted “Two And A Half Men” upon us.

I realize that Gilliam hasn’t reached quite the level of genius he once had — personally, I think the Don Quixote fiascoes broke him more than a little — but still. Gilliam created a few near-perfect films — Time Bandits is one of them. Of course, there’s no guarantee that this will actually happen. But we can assure you this: if it doesn’t, it’s certainly not because a Hollywood producer said to Collins and Ryan, “My Gods, have you two cranked-up meatsacks no decency at all?”

Terry Gilliam could not be reached for comment, on account of the two of us being drunk, in addition to having no idea how to contact famous people without violating stalking laws.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Hangover 2 Trailer: You Know, You Can't Just Make the Same Movie Again and Put a "2" On It | The Best Uses of Poetry? Let Me Count The Ways.









Comments

Who really needs an excuse to drink?

Posted by: , at April 1, 2011 11:20 AM

Terry Gilliam has stupendous difficulties raising $$$ to attempt the filming of masterpieces. If these jokers can raise a penny trashing one of his classic films I will be beyond pissed. They better not publish their addresses on imdb.

Posted by: xoxoxoe at April 1, 2011 11:20 AM

As a kid, I thought Time Bandits was a fun adventure film. The ending didn't really sink in. As an adult I find it deeply, deeply disturbing. (Well done, but disturbing nonetheless.) There's no way I'd let my kid watch it, not even reimagined as a light & breezy adventure flick. His parents! They're dead!!! Ugh.

Posted by: cydeleida at April 1, 2011 11:20 AM

p.s. this has got to be an April fool's joke, right?

Posted by: xoxoxoe at April 1, 2011 11:22 AM

Feel free to fill this in.

_____ the _____ ______ ________ in the ___________ ___________ around a _______ and up Hollywood's _______.

Posted by: commanderfunky at April 1, 2011 11:23 AM

It might be time to just give up the fight and admit that we're all old.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at April 1, 2011 11:24 AM

If I were creating a world, I wouldn't mess about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers 8:00 Day One.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 1, 2011 11:24 AM

I think Michael Macintyre said he best on Big Fat Quiz of the year back in December.

NO! NO! NO! No.

This simply doesn't exist.

Posted by: grace b at April 1, 2011 11:24 AM

I don't think this is a joke. The only seeming joke I've found so far is that I keep clicking on that River Song link without being routed anywhere.

It's interesting to me how April Fool's awareness seems to have increased greatly only over the past few years. Pajiba had a few April 1st good jokes, but now it seems that a greater and greater number of people are ready and waiting for any pranks because so many more people have been burned by the more universal forum of the Internet.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at April 1, 2011 11:34 AM

It's too obvious when it just says Posted on April 1st". It doesn't look right. Nice touch though adding the 23 comments. I actually thought that one was real.

Posted by: jesuschrysler at April 1, 2011 11:35 AM

Only April Fools Joke worse than this one is the River Song post where all the links are broken.

Dustin! Don't do this to an old woman. My heart can only take so much.

Posted by: BWeaves at April 1, 2011 11:35 AM

p.s. this has got to be an April fool's joke, right?

Not even I could be that cruel.

Posted by: TK at April 1, 2011 11:36 AM

I think my brain is bleeding, anyone got a tissue?

Posted by: Magiel at April 1, 2011 11:38 AM

Sadly, TK isn't the first to be reporting this and not on April 1st. So I doubt that it's an April's Fool.

Sadly, I think that we're set to see every movie we held sacred remade/re-imagined/sequeled. Studios are desperate for hits and it's more cost-effective to just give you more of what you liked.

Posted by: Fredo at April 1, 2011 11:40 AM

This might be my last straw. I pray that nobody messes with Time Bandits. I love that movie. I had it on VHS and bought it again on DVD.

I will never pay for another movie again if Time Bandits is fucked with.

Posted by: CarolinaHaze at April 1, 2011 11:44 AM

Not even I could be that cruel.
Posted by: TK at April 1, 2011 11:36 AM

I'm certain you can and have been that cruel.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 1, 2011 11:49 AM

Even if this were a joke, it would only give some jackass in Hollywood the idea to do it anyway. The original idea well is almost dry. The only things stuck in the bottom are shitfests like Suckerpunch.

Posted by: Paultera at April 1, 2011 12:05 PM

The ending of Time Bandits is awful? huh. I never got that message. I always felt that Kevin ended the movie freed of his boorish parents, able to dash off on any adventure he saw fit, be it in books or by the return of the bandits themselves.

I didn't like his parents much and I really got the impression he didn't, either.

What kid doesn't have that fantasy at least once?

Posted by: lubeg at April 1, 2011 12:22 PM

My in-laws and I tried to watch this movie the other day. None of us had seen it before. I think we made it past five minutes of going "what the FUCK?" before we decided to stop.

So...yeah, whatever. Truth be told I've never liked a Terry Gilliam film outside his Monty Python work.

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2011 12:24 PM

My mom took me to see this in the theater when I was really young and it scared the shit out of me.

Posted by: honeybee at April 1, 2011 12:25 PM

Did anyone watch the original movie. It's a bad movie. The original movie makes little sense. The story was very weak. I'm all for the remake.

Posted by: madclawmannn at April 1, 2011 12:41 PM

Yes. I totally think it's time for a Monty Python reboot.
Oh God. I just puked.

Posted by: Odnon at April 1, 2011 1:16 PM

I'm certain you can and have been that cruel.

Harsh, but fair.

Posted by: TK at April 1, 2011 1:25 PM

I saw this when I was a kid and I thought it was totally apropos that Kevin's dumb-ass parents blew themselves up with concentrated evil at the end because it's illustrative of both how dim-witted they are and how they disregard Kevin completely. It's not like Gilliam leaves Kevin hanging there to be shipped off to the orphanage. Sean Connery the fireman is there -- in other words, the only character that Kevin connects with and cares about in a parent sort of way reappears at the end. Seems like it worked out perfectly to me.

In other news, if Hollywood sumbitches can defile my childhood by remaking "Arthur" with Russell f'ing Brand and Jennifer f'ing Garner, then what the hell hope do I have for them to not do it to this also.

Posted by: JrFanBoy at April 1, 2011 1:32 PM

I shall unleash the ghost of Graham Chapman on these two assholes! Let The Colonel bash them each over the head with his swagger stick and bark, "Stop that! It's SILLY!"

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 1, 2011 1:52 PM

JrFanBoy - I agree. I thought, as a kid, that Kevin was better off and I still feel that way, now.

Though, to be fair, Sean Connery the firefighter does rather casually and quickly abandon him. He winks, nods and hops right on to the firetruck and races off without so much as a look back.

Posted by: lubeg at April 1, 2011 1:54 PM

touche, Lubeg. It's been a while since I saw it, so I forgot that part.

Nevertheless, my impression of that close is still that Kevin hasn't been left completely alone. Even if Sean Connery doesn't recognize Kevin, Kevin sure recognizes SC. This in conjunction with his earlier relationship with Agememnon (which he didn't want to leave) seems to say that SC is Kevin's true parent, not the dopes he was living with.

Posted by: JrFanBoy at April 1, 2011 2:12 PM

April Fools'! There's no sources. Write a fake source!

Posted by: AlexaCastro at April 1, 2011 2:26 PM

Nevertheless, my impression of that close is still that Kevin hasn't been left completely alone. Even if Sean Connery doesn't recognize Kevin, Kevin sure recognizes SC. This in conjunction with his earlier relationship with Agememnon (which he didn't want to leave) seems to say that SC is Kevin's true parent, not the dopes he was living with.

I completely agree. Kevin did recognize him and is left with some measure of hope. One can only surmise how a boy as resourceful as Kevin might resolve his circumstances. After all, it can't be very far to the local fire station and Kevin never demonstrated a fear of approaching the unknown.

He also still has his photographs, so far as we know. Including the one with the map.

Posted by: lubeg at April 1, 2011 2:27 PM

Time Bandits 2: The Bludgeoning.

Posted by: Odnon at April 1, 2011 2:40 PM

Y'know, now that I think about it, Tideland is sort of a spiritual sequel to Time Bandits. At least, in terms of what might happen when a child is freed from their dim witted parents and allowed to "adventure" of her own accord.

I've been feeling the same way recently, Darth. Not even 30, yet, and I just wanna drink prune juice and yell at kids for being so, so stupid. At least we'll always have our own Time Bandits.

Posted by: RobP at April 1, 2011 2:40 PM

Sorry for being late to the party but you are all missing the point of the true evil in this April Fools, a TV show of The Long Good Friday. Not even Satan himself would attempt such blasphemy.

Posted by: captainfireypants at April 3, 2011 10:07 PM