gemma-arterton.jpg
Three Musketeers: The Video-Game Movie?


And Other Headlines from the World of Movies / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | September 2, 2009 | Comments (20)


More evidence that God doesn’t exist? Paul W.S. Anderson, the tiny addled brain behind Mortal Kombat and Resident Evil is inexplicably bringing back the Three Musketeers. Again. He’s apparently unaware that Stephen Herek’s 1993 version can never be topped: Keifer Sutherland, Charlie Sheen, Chris O’Donnell, and Oliver Platt? That right there, folks, was a cinematic experience! Who needs an enema? That movie could flush any man’s bowels.

Anyway, Anderson thinks he can breathe new life into a tired old franchise that no one gives a shit about by making it into a 3D movie. And here I thought Anderson only did video-game movies? Perhaps someone will have to first turn the Three Musketeers into a video game before he can properly adapt it. And then proceed to massacre that adaptation. Circle of life.

Anderson’s version will apparently be “rich in eye-popping action, romance and adventure.” And it will also be modernized, yet still set in the appropriate era. I’m not sure how he plans to do that, but I suspect it will look something like “A Knight’s Tale,, only much, much worse.

Andrew Davies (Bridget Jones Diary) is set to pen the script along with Anderson.

In much better news, Stephen Frears (The Grifters, High Fidelity) has decided to adapt Posy Simmonds’ acclaimed graphic novel Tamara Drewe for the big screen. More importantly, it will star Gemma Arterton, who you may know as Quantum of Solace’s Strawberry Fields or the woman that is featured prominently in many a man’s nighttime fantasies. She will play Drewe, a sexy flirt who returns to her small country village and stirs up dark passions among the locals. Dominic Cooper, Roger Allam, Luke Evans, Bill Camp and Tamsin Greig will also star.

Meanwhile, that fat fuck over at AICN is reporting that Marvel is considering converting Iron Man 2 into 3D. In other words, this is not news. Also, a bad idea. 3D is still a gimmick, mostly for horror movies and kiddie films, and converting something into 3D that was filmed in 2D doesn’t look that great, and Marvel is not dumb enough to risk fucking up a good thing. It looks great for CGI films, but it still looks a little cheesy in live-action movies.

Finally, here’s a nice little featurette for Wes Anderson’s Fantastic Mr. Fox, narrated by Jason Schwartzman. The most fascinating thing about it is the revelation that the voice work was done, not in a sound studio, but on location. At a farm. And the actors, actually, seemed to duplicate the character’s movements. All of which is to say: That might be a more interesting film to watch.


Downey and Favreau Cowboys and Aliens | The Best Tribute Albums





Comments

Fuck 3D, man. What, it's not bad enough that I have to sell bone marrow to pay for a damn popcorn, now I have to pay an extra 5 bucks for a ticket, and I have to wear glasses that make me look like the worlds biggest dipshit while talentless actors eye fuck me to death?

A line needs to be drawn somewhere, and unless you're planning on making a total cinematic abortion (My Bloody Valentine 3D), 3D contributes nothing but expen- sive popcorn filled vomit cluttering seat isles, and a visual medium for the fucking Jonas Brothers to ejaculate all over the audience with a fire-hose.

Posted by: George at September 2, 2009 11:37 AM

ARGH. ARGH. ARGH. This is my fault. I know it is. Because when people were asking about what movies should be remade, I said The Three Musketeers. Because I love that book to death. FUCK. FUCK. WHY DID I DO THAT? I should know better.

THEY HAVE EYES EVERYWHERE, PEOPLE. EVERYWHERE.

*beats head against the wall as punisment*

Posted by: figgy at September 2, 2009 12:40 PM

Eh, god's non-existence was clearly established by The Hottie and the Nottie, circa 2008.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 2, 2009 12:51 PM

Oh and the only place were 3-D becomes an experience enhancer would be Porn. From "inside the ass" shots of hard, spit lubricated cocks going in, monster sized, pulsating clitorii. High velocity cumshots EXPLODING off the screen.

How come no one is doing this?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 2, 2009 12:59 PM

I love the Kiefer, Charlie, Oliver, etc. version of Three Musketeers. I has some strange power over me. If I come across it on cable, I can't change the channel or leave the house.

Posted by: Smello at September 2, 2009 1:15 PM

I'm still waiting on the day they make a movie based on a video that's based on the movie. I'm pretty sure the universe will fold in on itself.

Posted by: commanderfunky at September 2, 2009 1:21 PM

I'm with you there, Smello.

Also the version with Michael York is still the best out there.

Posted by: FabMax at September 2, 2009 1:24 PM

Hey! Didn't anyone else watch the video? Did no one else like it? Am I the only one a wee bit more excited about this? Hello?

I'll show myself out.

Posted by: Eyvi at September 2, 2009 2:02 PM

Eyvi, I'm very excited.

Posted by: Alon at September 2, 2009 2:53 PM

Eyvi, that post gave me a warm and fuzzy Fast Show vibe..."I'll get me coat"...

Posted by: laredo at September 2, 2009 2:59 PM

Yes FabMax! I love Michael York! I grew up with that movie and was in total shock to see Michael York in Austin Powers. Still love him, and that movie, despite it being a little loose with the book. Not nearly as loose as the damn Kiefer Sutherland version, sheesh.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at September 2, 2009 3:07 PM

Kiefer Sutherland, Charlie Sheen, Chris O'Donnell, and Oliver Platt? What an odd combination. It's like a more attractive version of The View.

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at September 2, 2009 3:39 PM

"Fat fuck"? Meeeooow.

Posted by: John W at September 2, 2009 3:46 PM

Harry "the Hutt" Knowles is a fat fuck and everyone knows it.

I will NOT watch the Mr. Fox crap. I will NOT. It looks terrible. It looks like the kind of bad dream brought on by eating a whole garlic-cheese ball at your parents' house during the holidays. NO.

Posted by: Jerce at September 2, 2009 5:09 PM

Am I the only one that heard And it will also be modernized, yet still set in the appropriate era and that it could kind of be badass if they made a modern Three Musketeers set in the present?

Posted by: Deistbrawler at September 2, 2009 6:28 PM

I don't think that I will be able to watch The Fantastic Mr. Fox. Something about the way they look and move reminds me of the time-lapse videos they would show in school of the animals decomposing. Creepy.

Posted by: misty at September 2, 2009 7:07 PM

Humhum... It makes me more intrigued, but still not very pumped, you know? Like, I have this bad feeling it's going to be terrible and I don't ever want to leave an Anderson film thinking bad thoughts about it.

Posted by: Sapphiar at September 2, 2009 8:18 PM

Yes the animation looks cool. There may even be a decent plot/story behind it. I'm still not going because every furrie on the planet will be filling the theatres, multiple times. Orgasming every *freaking* moment.

Maybe a decade later, on DVD.....

Maybe.

Posted by: bjs1109 at September 2, 2009 8:42 PM

Deistbrawler, uh... no. As in Baz Luhrmann's Romeo & Juliet? shudder.

Or are we just talking any modern movie with 4 bad-ass dudes who go around fucking shit up? But like, for a good cause.

Either way, no. No no no no no.

Maybe the musketeers could support Obama and the cardinal's men could support...Falwell? I don't know, but it's ugly as sin to think about. I'm gonna go take a bath to wash off the icky.

Posted by: ahamos at September 2, 2009 10:10 PM

Ha! It's funny 'cause he IS a fat fuck.

With the ugliest site on the internet.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at September 3, 2009 9:31 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.