free counter with statistics The Way They Treat Pajibas | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

lost-michael.jpg


Yeah! I Don’t Like the Way They Treat Pajibas Either!

The Daily Trade Round-Up / The TV Whore
June 4, 2008

Trade News | June 4, 2008 | Comments (60)


Because you asked for it. Because you begged for it. Because you must’ve done something really terrible in your prior life — Hitler and Stalin-type terrible — A&E will be hitting you with a second season of “The Two Coreys” in lo a few weeks. Ten p.m., June 22, if you’re not sitting on your couch watching A&E, you are sparing yourself the kind of mind-numbing trauma that comes from watching more of the “no-holds-barred fresh look at the two former friends’ damaged relationship.” Holy fucking hell.

ABC’s signed Roger Bart (best known, perhaps, as the crazy pharmacist in the first season of “Desperate Housewives”) for a new pilot. Unfortunately, it’s yet another lawyer show, with Bart playing an L.A. law firm partner where his wife is also a partner, blabbity blah blah.

You know what? For the next month, these Round Ups will not be mentioning any television show that focuses on doctors, lawyers, or cop/investigator-types. I need a fucking break.

And there’s been some casting news related to “Crash,” the Don Cheadle and Paul Haggis produced show based on the wonderful, wonderful film. But I’m putting a temporary Round Up moratorium on this fucker too.

But I can definitely talk about Ronald D. Moore — over at Fox, they’ve landed a lead for Moore’s “Virtuality.” The show, about a crew on a 10-year space mission, will have James D’Arcy playing the lead role of the onboard officer responsible for the virtual reality technology that will be the show’s focus. If you’re asking yourself who James D’Arcy is, that’s a fair question. He’s a Brit, and while I’ve never seen anything he’s been in, you might know him from Exorcist: The Beginning or Master and Commander. Maybe. In any event, I’m still way skeptical of this show, but with Moore behind it and Peter Berg directing the pilot, I remain willing to give it the benefit of the doubt until I have a solid reason not to.

In HBO news, I know most people never tried watching the show, let alone tried sticking with all 45 episodes, but I kinda dug “In Treatment.” Gabriel Byrne’s accent was a tragic mess, but his performance was otherwise pretty great, as was Dianne Wiest’s. And young Mia Wasikowska was quite the find. While I assumed the show would be a one-and-done, it seems there’s now a chance that we could get a second season. Normally, I’d be excited about a show I enjoyed coming back for more. But truthfully, I’m not sure I would’ve had the patience to stick with the five-episode-a-week format if it weren’t for the fact that the strike had decimated most other shows and in a non-strike season, I can’t see its weak numbers going anywhere but down. However, I’d gladly dedicate two hours a day to “In Treatment” over watching even one hour of Kim Cattrall’s new HBO series, “Sensitive Skin.” The show is yet another British adaptation (I’m this close to banning talk of Americanizations, too), with Cattrall playing a middle-aged NYC woman rediscovering her sexuality and place in the world. Way to stretch yourself, Kim.

And lastly, let’s talk about “Lost” for a second. If you didn’t watch last week’s Season Four finale and don’t wanna be spoiled about something, best consider yourself down with this week’s Round Up and scroll on down to the comments. For the rest of you, turns out that Harold Perrineau is pissed off about the fact that Michael went all kablooey. In an interview with TV Guide, he said, upon hearing about the finale’s use of his character: “It’s like, what the hell? I came back for that?” He goes on to say that he’s disappointed, because he was hoping Michael and Walt would have a happy ending and that the show has just carried on with a pattern of treating black characters poorly:

Listen, if I’m being really candid, there are all these questions about how they respond to black people on the show. Sayid gets to meet Nadia again, and Desmond and Penny hook up again, but a little black boy and his father hooking up, that wasn’t interesting? Instead, Walt just winds up being another fatherless child. It plays into a really big, weird stereotype and, being a black person myself, that wasn’t so interesting. [Responds Cuse: “We pride ourselves on having a very racially diverse cast. It’s painful when any actor’s storyline ends on the show. Harold is a fantastic actor whose presence added enormously to Lost.”]

I’m calling major bullshit on this. Michael and Walt already had their relationship moments on the show. And if you look at the big picture, how about the fact that Sayid and Desmond are considerably more sympathetic characters than Michael, who sold out his fellow Losties, killing two of them in the process, and then squandered his relationship with Walt after getting back home. And as for the show’s treatment of black people, Eko was only killed off because Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje only wanted to do one season of the show. Yes, Walt may now be a stereotypical black child with no father, but I think it’s safe to say that there’s nothing particularly otherwise stereotypical about the show’s portrayal of Walt, and one suspects he’ll have a rather important role in the final two seasons of the show. How about you be a little less bitter, Harold? Particularly since, much as I enjoyed you both on “Lost” and “Oz,” you’re not a particularly great actor in the first place and should consider yourself at least a little lucky for the career you’ve had.

And besides, Perrineau has already signed on to a new pilto for ABC, “The Unusuals,” which is a dramedy wherein he’ll play a NYC detective who’s so nervous that he never takes his bulletproof vest off. Sounds splendid, and the perfect way to officially begin my one month moratorium on crap like this. Starting … now.

…And since originally writing this rant, Perrineau has clarified his statements, sorta, telling EW “I should probably think more before I say things.” You think? And it turns out he’s not bitter, just disappointed like he thinks the fans were. Sorry dude, wasn’t disappointed at all.

And for no reason — other than the fact that someone linked to Patton Oswalt’s “Deathbed” bit in the comments yesterday, and I’ve had Oswalt on the brain ever since — here’s a clip of Patton I discovered which warms my Philly heart (Butterscotch Krimpets, oh how I miss your waxy icing):


theTVwhore.jpg
Seth Freilich is Pajiba’s television editor. He’s more concerned about the treatment of polar bears on “Lost.” Seems as though they were being used for some island-moving slave labor, and that’s some bullshit.


Pajiba Love 06/03/08 | Beginner's Greek James Collins



Comments

I actually was disappointed by Michael's death. I wasn't sure if he was dead until I read all the backlash stuff from Perrineau. "You can go now." could mean all sorts of things on Hell Island, I figured Christian Ghost was going to teleport him away or something. What was the point of having him back, and even more important story wise, why was it important to the island? That was really the only unsatisfying bit out of the whole season. There was a whole thing about the island not letting him die but as far as I can tell he didn't do all that much and sure as hell wasn't pivotal to the events of the finale.

I think I'd be annoyed too if I were him. However bitching about it in a public forum and calling it racism was probably a bad move, especially since LOST does have such a diverse cast.

Posted by: Rob at June 4, 2008 8:40 AM

While I agree that Harold Perrineau came off as bitter and silly for playing the race card, I was disappointed in the way the Michael/Walt storyline played out. We still have no idea exactly how they got back to the mainland or what happened in between them heading off on whatever bearing and Walt ending up with his grandmother. And regardless of how terribly Michael went about trying to protect Walt and get him home safely, Walt doesn't know the lengths to which Michael went (to *protect* him). It seemed like every time Michael tried to be a good father, he screwed it up, but Walt should at least have been aware of the intent.

Meanwhile, HP should know better than to burn bridges in his industry.

Posted by: Cindy at June 4, 2008 8:41 AM

I completely agree with you, Seth. Harold needs to shut up. I thought that they wrapped Michael up really well. I forgot about what he douche he was until he was back on screen. I'm looking forward to Walt's role. Remember he has "powers" too.

Posted by: lyricalcatt at June 4, 2008 8:41 AM

How about you be a little less bitter, Harold? Particularly since, much as I enjoyed you both on "Lost" and "Oz," you're not a particularly great actor in the first place and should consider yourself at least a little lucky for the career you've had.

Harold why are you complaining? Stop being all uppity and thank the good lord that these good white folk seen fit to let you have a career in the first place.

Posted by: Pookie at June 4, 2008 9:11 AM

On HP, what Cindy and Rob said. Some Lostfans who've met him say he's actually a pretty nice and funny guy, and he held his own next to William Hurt and Harvey Keitel in Smoke, so I'm going to pretend never to have heard this rant.

Eko was only killed off because Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje only wanted to do one season of the show.

The Wikipeople claimed it was because both of his parents died and he asked to be written out.

Good luck on keeping up your moratoria, Seth.

Posted by: Adere at June 4, 2008 9:17 AM

I thought they wrapped up Michael okay, but I still was left thinking, they made such a huge deal about brining him back on the show... for that? 4 or 5 episodes? Of which only 1 really featured him for more than 5 minutes? I thought it was a waste, but calling it racist is just stupid.

It's a lot like how I felt about Nikki and Paulo. I didn't mind them so much until the producers admited to us that they were worthless. As long as I thought they had a point to the overall storyline, I could tollerate the sloppy introduction. But once they killed them off, without having them add anything whatsoever to the story, I got angry.

Feels like the same thing here. A huge character wasted on something that doesn't seem nearly as important as the hype led us to believe.

Posted by: Bistro at June 4, 2008 9:17 AM

I thought they did explain what happened to Walt & Michael after they left the island in the Others' boat at the end of season 2. And he kept trying to kill himself but the only way he'd succeed would be when the island was ready for him to die. Hence his duty to sabotage the freighter, and Spooky Christian appearing before him in the moments before his death. It was his time. He wasn't particularly special anyway - it was always Walt who was the more fascinating character.

My only question: Was he there to sabotage the freighter inorder to prevent the bad guys from hurting the island & it's inhabitants, or to prevent anyone from the island from escaping? Maybe both?

Posted by: Kolby at June 4, 2008 9:22 AM

Aaron was a fatherless child long before Walt was. I guess they have something against Australians too.

Posted by: Jab at June 4, 2008 9:22 AM

I actually kept with "In Treatment" through its entire, but yeah, now that the strike is over that's gonna be way to much work. It was a nice little show, though I never got the feeling that I really need more.

As for Harrold Perrineau, bitch please. Considering that the last time we saw his character before this season he had pulled a Judas and screwed over everyone, I think someone should count themselves fucking lucky to be brought back and redeemed. Also, for all of the daddy issues that run rampant on Lost he was actually one of the better portrayed fathers, since all of the dumb shit he did was done to save his son. With the lack of black characters on TV at all, he should be grateful that he isn't forced to work UPN/CW pipeline.

Posted by: jM at June 4, 2008 9:39 AM

Goddamnit, television makes me crazy. I'm about to start making my own television shows on my farm. Hell, spending all day with my dogs is just like watching "The Hills", they all sit around and just stare at each other or off into space. A couple voice overs and some segue music and I've got a hit show on my hands.

Seriously, I watch like three shows currently on television and only one of them is respected by it's network. The other two constantly get fucked over when it comes to scheduling and promotion.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at June 4, 2008 9:57 AM

Is it just me, or does anyone else find that Perrineau plays the "black guy who gets killed" in just about everything? Granted I'm not familiar with his entire filmography, but I know he got killed as Mercutio in Romeo and Juliet, and I seemed to recall his ass being mauled by a bear in some weird movie with Anthony Hopkins, plus he died on Oz too... and now Lost? Can't dude catch a break?

Posted by: b at June 4, 2008 10:11 AM

b, (which, by the way, is the wierdest name to bold), you're thinking of The Edge with Anthony Hopkins... which may be the worst movie I've ever seen, as I scoured it out of my memory until right this moment.

Posted by: twig at June 4, 2008 10:27 AM

b, HP did catch a break, because he himself got reunited with his estranged father in Smoke. Hence the character dadday issues.

Posted by: Adere at June 4, 2008 10:32 AM

Actually, in Micheal's recent backstory episode, didn't one of the Others figure out that Micheal was so torn with guilt over killing Ana-Lucia & Libby that he told Walt about it, and that's why Walt refused to see him?



I was sad that they were not reconciled before the end, but I wasn't sad when Micheal died. I was too busy screaming about Jin still being on the boat. I'm still holding out hope he's not really dead!! (I know, we've seen Sun visit his grave - I have trouble believing anyone is *really* dead on the show. Until the actor starts showing up in other things.)



All that said, I kind of half-heartedly agree with Harold: it would have been great to see Micheal get to be the dad he never had a chance to be, instead of a suicidal turncoat. I have doubts as to whether the writers were motivated to kill him off by racism, or to get Walt back to front and center so we can figure out why birds like to commit suicide around him (they will tell us, won't they?!?!)

Posted by: JanetFaust at June 4, 2008 10:38 AM

I just realized something. The new moratoriums mean MUCH shorter TV trade roundups. Like, maybe three sentences short some weeks.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at June 4, 2008 10:59 AM

Genny, I think you may have stumbled onto the Next Big Thing: reality shows starring pets.

I'd like to suggest Project Runaway and a very special episode of Canine Intervention, where a distraught pack confronts a troubled dog about his cat-poop addiction.

Posted by: Wednesday at June 4, 2008 11:00 AM

Ah HBO...you used to be so cutting edge. Nothing but hit shows. Awards out the ass. Now you're becoming like every other network in the 1990's: a handful of hits, some great miniseries, and some really shitty shows. Here's hoping you don't catch up with present day network "standards". (FX, consider this your bubble notice. You're high on the hog now, but there's nowhere to go but down.)

Posted by: Mike R. at June 4, 2008 11:11 AM

" Virtuality. The show, about a crew on a 10-year space mission, will have James D'Arcy playing the lead role of the onboard officer responsible for the virtual reality technology that will be the show's focus."

Um, wasn't this the plot of the entire run of Star Trek: The Next Generation?

Perhaps they should have called it Star Trek: The Next Generation In My Pants?

Posted by: BWeaves at June 4, 2008 11:16 AM

i frequently choose to watch my dog, 5r, over the offerings on television. he's both more interesting and better looking.

likewise, i often find myself in movie theatres thinking, "would i rather be here, watching this mediocrity, surrounded by chatty kathys and loud-breathers OR at home snuggling with 5r and a good book?" it takes a pretty good flick to make it worth giving up a night with the super pup.

dogs are the new sponge... and i don't mean that in a dirty way.

also, perrineau was cool on oz until he started doing heroin to impress rick fox. seriously.

Posted by: celery at June 4, 2008 11:20 AM

your dog is named 5r celery? I kinda like it...

and as I don't watch Lost (nothing against the show, I just never had the time in the beginning and I can't get myself to jump in so many seasons in), most of this round-up/comments mean nothing to me

sooo, back to my lunch!

Posted by: Bethy at June 4, 2008 11:42 AM

Mike R on the HBO front, I'm hoping True Blood will be something cutting edge. And in a neat Lost connection, Michael Emerson's wife has a role.

Posted by: Cindy at June 4, 2008 11:51 AM

I thought HP's comments were ridiculous. Sure, there was a little too much hype for Michael being brought back, but it probably would have been a lot more exciting if we didn't all already know the actor was returning. TV and movie surprises have really been ruined by this Internet thing...

Anyway, I actually liked that Michael died. He did what he set out to do, he did save them with his whole freezing the battery thing/knocking out the engines/whatever else he did while he was on that boat. And because his purpose had been served, he was finally able to rest. Like someone else said, there wasn't much more for his character to do on the show anyway. So he didn't get to reconcile with his son... plenty of people don't. That's life. Get over it.

Posted by: Jen Diff at June 4, 2008 11:55 AM

Bethy, that's why I started talking about my dogs, I don't watch Lost either.

celery, with one dog it's probably great, when you have 4 competing for attention (three of which are most assuredly NOT lap dogs) it can get a little hairy. But they are far more entertaining than most television. Especially when one of our three cats makes an appearance.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at June 4, 2008 12:05 PM

I don't watch Lost but mmmmmm...butterscotch krimpets. I think I need to run to the vending machine.

Posted by: Patti at June 4, 2008 12:10 PM

Didn't HP die in one of the Matrix sequels too?

Posted by: SCG at June 4, 2008 12:20 PM

well I don't have a dog Genny, but I have a cat!

and shes been driving me NUTS lately...

Posted by: Bethy at June 4, 2008 12:42 PM

I read the movie title as Exorcist: The Beginning of Master and Commander, strange.

I was disappointed with the Michael storyline this season, way too much hype. He even got a flash of Libby at one point which I thought would mean bigger and better things, but nothing.
And I'm going to have to disagree about him coming back, because they've already got Emilie de Ravin (Claire) under contract for Season 6 but not 5. If HP was coming back I think they'd do the same just to make sure he was available.

Posted by: Stew at June 4, 2008 12:46 PM

Stew- I read it the same way and was very confused. In fact, I didn't realize that I had misread it until your comment. Now, it makes much more sense.

Posted by: tamatha at June 4, 2008 12:49 PM

BWeaves I think you clearly meant Star Trek: The Next Generation: The Search for More Money (in your pants). Fixed that for you.

Posted by: lordhelmet at June 4, 2008 12:54 PM

Regarding HP and the Lost issue, the way I see it, Christian telling Michael that he could "go now" meant "now you finally get to die, and the writers did you a favor by making your death have a redeeming quality to it, since you killed people and fucked over your friends to get off the island in the first place." Shut up about the "black" thing. It has nothing to do with being black; we all know he busted out the race card to keep his name in the blogs and whatnot.

Thank you for the clip. I was laughing my ass off. "Come to Roxborough, I'll make you a hoagie." Also, Chocolate Juniors RULE, but nothing beats Peanut Butter Kandy Kakes.

Posted by: Nicole at June 4, 2008 1:00 PM

I have two cats -- Dash, Dash Riprock (the trouble maker), and Cyka (the fat mouthy one). They generally entertain me more than TV does most nights.

I bet Pajibans are just naturally drawn to more entertaining pets. I think we should get all of the Pajiban pets together, and set them loose in a few strategically chosen TV execs offices. At best, the pets might eat them. At worst, they might eat some network notes and crap out some pilots and scripts that suck less than the ones currently available.

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at June 4, 2008 1:01 PM

Agree about Perrineau's nonsense, but there were a couple of things that got lost (hah!) in the furor about it:

1) How funny is it that he referenced Sayid's plotline to support his argument? Sayid plays an Arab (though I think Naveen Andrews is Indian), and Arabs are probably the most discriminated-against group in the U.S. right now. So, Harold, aside from being paranoid, you're fucking stupid too.

2) How do we know Perrineau's character is actually dead? Yes, the ship blows up, but I never saw Michael's body or other proof. They do crazy shit all the time like bring back people we thought were dead. Having said that, if he was in their future plans before, he's probably not now. So again, Harold, you're a fucking idiot.

As for Perrineau's predilection for getting killed, he appeared to survive 28 Weeks Later, though it's not clear, and that is a movie in which it is easy to get yourself murdered.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 4, 2008 1:10 PM

What, Harold, no love for Rose?

Posted by: KateNonymous at June 4, 2008 1:25 PM

Okay, devil's advocate time.

Is what he said really that horrible? I can see why, when other characters were able to reunite with their loved ones, as short-lived as the reunions are, it was off-putting that he didn't get to enjoy such a moment with his character. Especially since, he had to play such a traitorous jackass for so long, maybe he just wanted one thing to go right for the character.

Now I agree that it was weird that he said it about Lost, which as many of you pointed out, is far from happy bunnies and such. But to call him an idiot and saying he should be grateful and shut up just because he criticized one aspect of the show? Especially since he did regret what he said? It is a bit ridiculous.

Just as ridiculous: saying that Michael somehow didn't deserve to reconcile with Walt because of all the shit he pulled. Yeah, he was a fuckup, but it isn't like he did it for shits and giggles. He was doing what he thought was right, and paid for it dearly.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 4, 2008 1:31 PM

I am ALL for that PaleoLithchick !

My Dinah (short for Diana:Goddess of the Hunt) could probably inflict some serious damage too.
She bats a faces with paws/claws, has a mean teeth nibble and has learned how to pul my hair by biting and pulling...

and she has a vendetta against all paper and writing utensils, so those afore-mentioned notes on the TV schedule line-ups? Gone my friend

gone

Posted by: Bethy at June 4, 2008 1:38 PM

But to call him an idiot and saying he should be grateful and shut up just because he criticized one aspect of the show?

Is that what he's being criticized for, though? It's one thing to say, "I thought it was a compelling storyline, and I thought fans were reacting well to my character, so I'm irritated with the producers for writing me out. I did everything they asked, and they crapped on me, and that sucks." But throwing race out there is pretty incendiary. I'm sure the show relies on drawing fans of all backgrounds (though it's probably a primary candidate for thingswhitepeoplelike.com), and this kind of PR ain't the good kind.

He had a significant part on a huge hit show, so he should be grateful in a general way, just like stupidass Claire (wheh's maheee bah-beeeeee!) should be glad they plucked her out of obscurity. It's understandable to be pissed about being written out of the show. But even a passing comment linking it to race is inexcusable -- is a white driver's frustration over heavy traffic an excuse to mutter a passing comment about "Asian drivers," even if it's just to himself?

I do think it's an odd response to his comments to say, "Well, Michael did a bunch of bad/crazy shit on the show, so Harold Perrineau deserves to go." Michael is a fictional character with no relation to HP's deserving more work, and a redemptive storyline for that character could last for several seasons -- they've done more with less.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 4, 2008 1:45 PM

I side with Harold on this. I was THOUROUGHLY disappointed that they killed michael - i mean, what was the point of making such a big production for so long, just to blow him up? They really didn't even do much with the character. I was looking forward to more Michael storyline developement, but now it's all literally blown to bits.


Very disapponted, LOST, on your sad use of what was a fantastic character, and definately had more potential for upcoming tear jerker moments.

I mean, you definately won't see me crying tears of anything if there's ever a kate and jack reunion or whatever.

Posted by: sarah at June 4, 2008 1:50 PM

"He was doing what he thought was right, and paid for it dearly."

Which scenario are you referring to, Verm? When he murdered two people in order to save his son so they could get off the island and leave everyone else behind? Or when he joined the crew of the freighter in order to sabotage it and finally succeed in killing himself? Because the way I remember it, before Tom came to see him to tell him about the "project" the Others had for him, he was all about committing suicide and leaving his son behind.

Posted by: Kolby at June 4, 2008 2:19 PM

Because the way I remember it, before Tom came to see him to tell him about the "project" the Others had for him, he was all about committing suicide and leaving his son behind.

Word, Kolby.

I don't get why people are disappointed about Michael's arc. His return was his way to redeem himself. He saved the people on the island and the people in the chopper. Yes, he had to pay with his life. That's the way it goes. Closure with Walt? Wasn't going to happen. Walt wanted nothing to do with him.

Posted by: Nicole at June 4, 2008 2:47 PM

A second season of The Two Coreys?! Alert Stacey, I'm sure she'll be thrilled.
And since I have not watched Lost, ever(Minus one episode on DVD) I will go into my corner and wait until the spoilers are out of the way.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at June 4, 2008 3:03 PM

Not quite true Vermillion. Michael had a quite nice reunion with Walt at the end of season 2 when he's finally allowed to see and leave with him. Reconciliation is a whole different issue, but why should his story be all rosy when it seems increasingly likely that no one else's is going to be that way.

I don't understand everyone's gripe with his role in season 4. Someone had to be an insider on the boat for Ben to have all the information he did, and better that it was a juicy character from the past rather than yet another new character being introduced. And I also like his redemption through the process. I was saddened by his actions in season 2, so to see his good side come through again was a relief.

I also don't understand how there could be any doubt to Michael being dead. His backstory and the way he was 'released' from the island by Christian Sheppard are clearly indicative of his being gone for good.

Posted by: katy at June 4, 2008 3:10 PM

Because the way I remember it, before Tom came to see him to tell him about the "project" the Others had for him, he was all about committing suicide and leaving his son behind.

But that is what I meant by "what he THOUGHT was right." I agreed that he made some dumbass moves, but as any dumbass with tell you: it always seems like a good idea at the time.

Plus, I agreed the race thing was ill-advised at best, but it seemed like folks were criticizing him for even daring to question what the writers did to his character. And he did regret his statement, didn't he? So why all the sore feelings?

I am not saying he needed a happy ending, or that the race-baiting was right. I am just saying that the reaction to it seems a bit harsh. What, people can't just say stupid shit anymore?

Posted by: Vermillion at June 4, 2008 3:23 PM

What, people can't just say stupid shit anymore?

Yes. But that's what the MurderTank is there for.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 4, 2008 3:26 PM

Oh Vermillion, I see your friends are turning on you, LOL. Now when I was trying to defend TP about the same shit that you're railing about, you tried to tell me in so many words, to shut the fuck up and stop complaining. So I said to myself one day he will come to understand what I've been trying to say, and now that day is here. Vermillion you were the best thing since sliced bread when you were speaking out against TP, but now that you're speaking up for Perrineau you offend them. Oh well.

Posted by: Pookie at June 4, 2008 4:05 PM

LOL. Now when I was trying to defend TP about the same shit that you're railing about,

Except Perrineau didn't build his entire career off of stupid shit.

Besides, it isn't like they HAVE to agree with me.

Nice try, though.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 4, 2008 5:26 PM

" Except Perrineau didn't build his entire career off of stupid shit."

Exactly, and yet they still want to bust his balls because he made a comment about the direction of the story line. Actors make comments all the time about characters that they play, but HP's comments are somehow considered blasphemy.

Posted by: Pookie at June 4, 2008 6:13 PM

Where does it say that a character has to have a happy ending? Michael was redeemed and I think that was a good enough ending for the character, all thing's considered. [And btw, we know that Sayid's 'happy ending' doesn't turn out well.] Yes, HP is probably disappointed but I seem to remember Dominic Monaghan was too when Charlie was killed. The bitching about the race thing just makes him look bitter and stupid.

Posted by: Subi at June 4, 2008 7:23 PM

Eh, I agree with him, ie, that the way they dealt with his character was dumb. I don't think it was racially motivated, though. But it's not like he can never be on the show again (well, before he said anything, that is), they show us dead people all the time, in flashbacks. As far as controversy over his statements, this is the first I've heard of them. So must not be too much controversy. I was also disappointed in the Eko ending. I liked him and really really wanted to see more of his character. I like Perrineau as an actor in other stuff too.

I guess if forced to reach a conclusion, I think Perrineau was making an assumption he probably shouldn't have about why his character appeared to die on the show (we don't know that he did for sure, maybe he'll turn up later but Walt thinks he's dead and that becomes some sort of major plotline/motivation, you know how this show is), was quite unwise to bring up the race thing, but people say shit like this all the time. Accusing people of doing things because of race, gender, sexual orientation, age, whatever.

Posted by: Slash at June 4, 2008 7:31 PM

Slash said it perfectly. People say shit like that all the time; what makes this instance so special? Why is it this particular remark is so unforgivable? If Cuse et al don't have a problem with it, why do you folks?

Posted by: Vermillion at June 4, 2008 8:20 PM

Verm, all I can say is that I don't appreciate that his bitterness was coupled with the race card. Monaghan was disappointed to be written out, but he wasn't all "It's because they don't like Hobbits." It would have been far more gracious if he realized that he was an important part of a cultural phenomenon and accepted that the character's arc had come to a believable (insofar as we can call LOST believable) conclusion. Saying I'm sorry afterwards doesn't make it right. It just means your agent was hissing in your ear, "Jackass! You're going to end up like Isaiah Washington!"

Posted by: Nicole at June 4, 2008 9:42 PM

'ABC's signed Roger Bart for a new pilot. Unfortunately, it's yet another lawyer show, with Bart playing an L.A. law firm partner where his wife is also a partner.'

Yawn...that sounds boring...

Posted by: Neena at June 5, 2008 2:33 AM

Then what is the point of apologizing then? Since nobody is going to believe it? What else can he do? And even if they did tell him to back off so he didn't end up like Washington, isn't that a good thing? That means somebody is doing their job and making sure that the guy doesn't get his head completely wedged in his own ass.

Plus, why is it such a big deal to you guys, the audience? Did he accuse you of racism? Not that I can see. And yet it seems like it is being taken personally. Like he slapped your mother and kicked your childhood pet/first love/etc at the same time. And it isn't like he pulled a Caruso, and totally ditched the show because he thought he was hot shit or anything.

And, if we must bring Washington in this, I can have to point out that Washington was a real-life jackass who screwed himself multiple times, and never really apologized. If Harold had pulled the "rehab" card, then I would be pissed right along with you. But he simply said he should have thought about his words, and that he was more disappointed than bitter. Isn't that pretty much it, then? Or is it that he can't be disappointed AT ALL?

It just seemed like folks here were getting super-defensive and indignant for no apparent reason. He said something remarkably stupid, and then regretted it. That is all he can do. If that doesn't count for something, what does? I mean, you don't have to give the guy a parade, but at least calm down and let it go.

And still, all this "grateful" business is bugging me. I don't see where he expressed he wasn't grateful for being part of this show anywhere. And unless I am wrong, I do not believe it is required for him to agree with every decision made simply out of gratitude.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 5, 2008 6:05 AM

Vermillion you can pontificate until the cows come home. You and I both know what this is about, but yet still want them to come around to your way of thinking, which they never will. You know damn well what they mean when they start talking about being "grateful". To tell you the truth Vermillion, I kinda fell sorry for you. You were under the impression that they thought HP and TP were somehow different. Maybe in your eyes you thought HP and TP were different, but the good folk here at pajiba told you and showed you otherwise. Vermillion, I got a spot on my team if you want it, it's all yours.

Posted by: Pookie at June 5, 2008 10:58 AM

And still, all this "grateful" business is bugging me.

Those comments rubbed me the wrong way as well. I can accept HP making a mistake and apologizing. I still think it's not smart to burn bridges, and hopefully Perrineau is smart enough to have made a couple of phone calls to smooth things over.

Posted by: Cindy at June 5, 2008 1:10 PM

I wanted to like In Treatment because of the cast, but I only made thru a couple episodes before giving up.

"Is it just me, or does anyone else find that Perrineau plays the "black guy who gets killed" in just about everything? .....Can't dude catch a break?"

His character managed to survive in Woman On Top. I don't watch Lost so I have nothing to say about that.

Posted by: Olivia at June 5, 2008 1:34 PM

Plus, why is it such a big deal to you guys, the audience? Did he accuse you of racism? Not that I can see. And yet it seems like it is being taken personally. Like he slapped your mother and kicked your childhood pet/first love/etc at the same time.

Whoa camel. I didn't know that was the test for discussion topics, in which case things are going to get awfully quiet around here. Someone said something stupid in the media and is getting ridiculed for it, just like every day.

Is Harold Perrineau's nonsense trivial on a micro level? Of course. Do lazy, empty-headed accusations of racism injure everyone in our society, especially people who actually experience real racism? Yes.

Making an accusation of racism is a big fucking deal -- when it's true, it's an important problem that needs to be jumped on and fixed. When it's not true, it's a hurtful, slanderous injury that needs to be jumped on and fixed.

It's not that he bitched and moaned about his character's fate, because who cares? And it's great that he apologized, but sometimes an apology is pretty weak coffee compared to the insult. If he were right about the racism angle, would an apology from the producers or writers be enough?

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 5, 2008 2:42 PM

Things I learned from the Pajiba website:

-People get a sick, hedonistic thrill out of watching black people die violent, senseless deaths.

-Black actors aren't allowed to question the motives of their former white employers to why they're now out of a job.

-A show like LOST promotes diversity yet all the juicist roles go to white actors while the USA's largest visible minority group cannot even get decent screentime.

-HP is fucking right- Micheal, Walt, Rose, Ms Clue, Mr Eko, Abbadon- all either dead, villainous or get 2 secs airtime. Rose and Walt will never be important. Blacks almost don't exist in this series.

-Every series on network televison does this. When it comes time to trim down a cast the black actors are always the ones on the chopping block. Just look back the past coupole of TV seasons:
-Alex (CSI Miami)
-Warrick (CSI)-murdered
-Elise (Close to Home)-murdered
-Aisha Tyler's character (Ghost Whisperer) crushed by plane debris
-Dr. Burke (Grey's Anatomy)-villianized,gunned down
-The Applewhites (Desperate Housewives)- murdered, stereotyped as criminals
-Micah's Dad (Heroes)-murdered
-countless blacks (Prison Break)-murdered
-Pres. Palmer (24)-murdered
... and the list goes on!

-the fact that none of you find any of this odd is disturbing. Blacks have every right to voice their disdain with the unbalanced protrayals of black characters on television. Especially given how close to home it mirrors the real-life racism and unfair, unequal treatment they daily face.

-Micheal wasn't perfect but he was a good father and I hope he appears again on the island as other ghosts have reappeared. It was a waste to bring him back just to give racists a hard-on as Keamy and Sayid kicked the living shit out of him, as his own son and mother disowned him, as he went around half loony trying to kill himself for no good reason and finally blow him to bits without even resolving anything with the people he turned in for the Others- Jack, Kate, Sawyer, Hurley.

And you expect HP to grovel at the feet of Cuse and Lidenof for that? Why don't you all now shut up and GFYS!!

Posted by: Reality Check! at June 6, 2008 4:57 AM

Until that last last sentence, I almost believed you were sincere. Now you're just being angry.

(and Palmer had run his course on "24", Haysbert still has "The Unit". Curtis would've been a better example: underused and ungracefully disposed of)

Posted by: Adere at June 6, 2008 5:58 AM

Why don't you all now shut up and GFYS!!

Yeah, I'll get right on that. Now, STFU! LOL!

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 6, 2008 8:55 AM

Angry? lol, really? Adere, why not just say Reality Check is just another angry black person? Who gives a fuck if what Reality Check says is true, lets just label him or her angry. That way we don't have to deal with the reality of which Reality Checks speaks of, kinda like Clinton saying the only reason she lost was because of sexism.

Posted by: Pookie at June 6, 2008 9:39 AM