free counter with statistics The Time Traveler's Wife Ending Changed | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

time-travelers-wife.jpg
A Series of Down Endings


The Time Traveler's Wife, Now Twice as Happy / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Trade News | August 5, 2009 | Comments (72)


Test audiences didn’t like the ending of The Time Traveler’s Wife, so they changed it so that it has a happy ending.

Director Robert Schwentke explained: “So we made the choice to say, ‘OK, we know what we need to do. We’re smarter now.’ It’s a process when you make a film. We hadn’t been dated or anything, so we felt like, ‘OK, let’s do the right thing. Let’s finish the movie properly.’”

Oh blind fury, how I’ve missed you. It’s been a week or two since you last curled my hands into claws to rip furrows from my own flesh.

“Properly”? Really? You’re going to go there? You’ve directed Flightplan and a single episode of “Lie to Me” and you’re going to swap out the gut-wrenching final scene of a beautiful story because 30 people you found at a mall on a Tuesday afternoon didn’t like being sad? It’s a tragic love story you ignorant twat, it’s not supposed to end with a warm and fuzzy “awwwwwww, how sweet.” The only things that should have happy endings in Hollywood are massages and Disney films, and even Walt killed Bambi’s mom.

Mrs. SLW pointed out The Time Traveler’s Wife to me a couple of days ago because she knew I loved the novel so much. I’d seen the trailer and explained to her that I didn’t hold out much hope for it as a movie because so much of the story is internalized characterization, which just doesn’t translate well to the visual medium of the screen. Well, I gave the film industry too much credit. The film isn’t going to suck because directors are incapable of translating internal characterization to the screen, it’s going to suck because they’re incapable of translating a fucking story onto the screen.

I flipped through SciFi Wire this morning and noticed a hilarious trend to the headlines over the last couple of days:

“God forbid you call Time-Traveler’s Wife a sci-fi film.”
“Hughes brothers: Don’t call Eli a post-apocalyptic thriller”
“Park Chan-wook: Don’t think of Thirst as a vampire movie”

Let’s just generalize the meme: “don’t think about movies as stories.” They’re not made for us to think about; they’re just there to give our reptile brains two-hour hand jobs.


Downey and Jude Law Make Out? | A Beginner's Guide to the Horror Genre



Comments

This shit looks like it was made by the Oxygen network

Posted by: helevent at August 5, 2009 3:40 PM

Even though the news is pure-grade bullshit, your delivery is excellent.

Posted by: twig at August 5, 2009 3:41 PM

The only things that should have happy endings in Hollywood are massages and Disney films, and even Walt killed Bambi’s mom.
I would have laughed at the brilliance of this comment, but the echoing emptiness in my soul drowned it out.
I wish I could just not see this movie, but I must. Well, at least maybe I can see a matinee and save myself $3...

Posted by: Patty O'Green at August 5, 2009 3:42 PM

So... What are the chances of this being some really elaborate hoax?

Can we please not rule that out as a possibility?

Posted by: DontStopNow at August 5, 2009 3:42 PM

NOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Also, "Oh blind fury, how I’ve missed you. It’s been a week or two since you last curled my hands into claws to rip furrows from my own flesh" is my new favorite quote of all time.

Posted by: tbean at August 5, 2009 3:43 PM

Wow. I've never seen you so angry, SLW.

...it's kind of turning me on. (Kidding, Mrs. SLW! Please don't hurt me. I'm very fragile.)

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at August 5, 2009 3:43 PM

I'm not even a huge fan of that book and I'm still mad that they're going to castrate it. It was going to be worthless anyway, but at least it could have been worthless while honoring the spirit of the novel and the author's intentions. Now it'll just be one of those sappy movies like The Notebook that your friends subject you to while you do your best not to make unfair judgements about them based on their movie preferences.

Also it will lead people to think the book has a happy ending and BOY WILL THEY BE SURPRISED.

Posted by: Genny (actually Rusty now) at August 5, 2009 3:46 PM

"OK, let’s do the right thing. Let’s finish the movie properly.’”

Yeah, let's finish it properly. Let's forget that this book was gorgeously crafted by a real artist before you got your hands on it-someone who had a vision for their characters and the paths their lives would take. YOU KNOW BETTER.

GAH!

Posted by: Julie at August 5, 2009 3:48 PM

I'm light headed, I might have a stroke and now I really need to go kill all my neighbors just to get the rage out, I'm sure if I explain them why I turned into the fucking Hulk they will be fine with their impending gruesome death.

Posted by: rio at August 5, 2009 3:50 PM

Okay it's one thing to change the ending of a movie with a story that was written just for the movie. Who would know but the people who wrote it/worked on the movie? But to change the ending of a movie that is based on a best selling book? Do they not understand that people actually read the books they buy, and not just leave them laying around to impress people? That we're going to notice?

Can the earthquake that breaks SoCal away from the rest of the state happen already so we can start over with Hollywood? Pretty please?

Posted by: Jeni at August 5, 2009 3:50 PM

rio, I find you adorable.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at August 5, 2009 3:58 PM

I'm a romance novelist, so happy endings are my life. But this news? Makes me think about heading into the horror genre instead. Bloody knives, decapitated movie producers, the works.

I hope like hell it's not true -- and regardless of test audience reaction, that there's enough of an uproar that they change the ending back.

Posted by: Meljean at August 5, 2009 4:02 PM

I finally watched the trailer for this movie when I was about 2/3 through the book, and was unimpressed. I could already tell that they were changing the tone to a schmaltzy love story that middle aged suburban women would love rather than a story of two flawed, rough around the edges people who happen to have a unique relationship. Adding this ending, therefore, doesn't really surprise me. But then again there were many times in this book where I felt like I was reading a glorified romance novel disguised as "literature", so why not?

Posted by: katy at August 5, 2009 4:04 PM

I so agree with you on this. It isn' the first time Hollywood has decimated a beautiful story in favor of a happy ending and I am sure it won't be the last.

Posted by: Fallon at August 5, 2009 4:10 PM

I don't even see how you can change the ending. Cut out before New Year's Eve? What about those moments he has with Alba? I CRIED FOR DAYS OVER THAT BOOK.

Posted by: Manda at August 5, 2009 4:13 PM

Do they not understand that people actually read the books they buy, and not just leave them laying around to impress people?

Um...I have several books that I bought just to say I have them.

*slowly heads toward exit*

Posted by: Marra at August 5, 2009 4:14 PM

So we're another step closer to Phillipsvision from "The Critic" and being able to alter movie endings to be more palatable. Looks like we'll see Citizen Kane's last word changed to "shwing" after all.

Posted by: branded at August 5, 2009 4:14 PM

Branded, they've tried...but Orson Welles kills every person who's tried to do it.

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at August 5, 2009 4:17 PM

What crap. The novel is an overrate POS, full of bathos and melodrama that descends into infertility porn for a good third of the book. Changing the ending, leave the ending, it's still 10 pounds of sci-fied up Harlequin presents drivel in a five-pound bag.

Posted by: katie at August 5, 2009 4:18 PM

"It's a mix of fantasy and crap - I call it fantacrap!"

Posted by: twig at August 5, 2009 4:19 PM

Oh, and I still maintain that I don't have to see this movie for one good reason: I've seen it already. It's called "The Girl in the Fireplace".

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at August 5, 2009 4:19 PM

STOP MESSING WITH THINGS!!!

Okay, I more or less love the book even though some things bother me only because I wish the author would have delved into some issues more (like how Clare seems to not have a choice, it's more or less set up for her and how much free will can she have if Henry has been her template for what she wants since she was 6?.

However, that doesn't mean you get to fuck around with an entire ending. Yes, the ending is supremely heart breaking, and it pissed me off but that's how it is and it shouldn't be changed.

Gah!

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at August 5, 2009 4:19 PM

I still don't want to see it.

That director, with his "finish it properly" bullshit, tho...kinda want to punch him in the balls for that comment. It *was* finished properly, as per the author's choice. Re-writing it to be happy just makes it...nonsensical. Go suck a bag of dicks, Mr. Schwentke.

Posted by: Chickaboom at August 5, 2009 4:27 PM

Thanks to this movie's sappy-ass, cotton candy trailer, my boyfriend refuses to give the book a fair chance.

And now he's fucked up the ending. Tell me, Schwentke, if test audiences whined about the end to Romeo and Juliet, would you have her wake up just in the nick of time? How's about a film adaptation of Les Miserables where everybody lives? Or a version of Hamlet where a magical black man played by Will Smith steps in as the family therapist and the story ends in a giant group hug? Would that be "proper?" Huh???

I said, would that be "proper" you illiterate, vapid, soulless douche-nozzle disguised as a filmmaker???

Fuck you, Schwentke. Fuck you right in the ear with an elephant's dick.

Posted by: ShinyKate at August 5, 2009 4:33 PM

see, now you'll be getting NONE of my money and ALL of my ire.

stupid, stupid people.

GAH!

Posted by: gp at August 5, 2009 4:47 PM

The makers and the audience should just go watch Altman's The Player instead. Maybe that will teach them.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 5, 2009 4:50 PM

we need a comment diversion (but label it extra-SPOILERy) where we re-write the endings to movies.
because, you know, titanic didn't have to be so sink-y.

Posted by: gp at August 5, 2009 4:53 PM

I have nothing clever to add to the vitriol, but I want to say thank you, seriously, for this tidbit, because now I can avoid this movie.

I take my books, my movies, and my love stories very seriously, and I don't want one second of this film to enter my brain and sully the memory of this book.

So, thank you.

Posted by: marya at August 5, 2009 4:58 PM

The test audiences don't know jack shit. The book was not supposed to make you feel all 'warm and fuzzy' at the end. Yes, parts of the book were sweet, but without the powerful ending the book has, it's no different than every other fugging romance movie.
I refuse to compare it to The Notebook which I HATED, because Niffenegger's story is so much better than this. Now I don't know what to think.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at August 5, 2009 5:00 PM

Oh fuck you, you FUCKS. These must be the same motherfuckers who thought that the original ending to I Am Legend was too complex for their brains.

MOTHERFUCKERS.

Posted by: figgy at August 5, 2009 5:13 PM

I agree with figgy : MOTHERFUCKERS.

Fucking motherfuckers.
.
.
.
p.s. Fuck you Robert Schwentke

Posted by: TheRealK at August 5, 2009 5:20 PM

Hell's bells.

I wonder if test audiences liked the ending of Love Story or Brian's Song. It's a sad story. Deal with it. Bunch of fucking test audience babies.

Posted by: greer at August 5, 2009 5:20 PM

When I heard they were making this into a movie, and then saw the trailer (and wept) I figured the ending was the only thing they couldn't change, because it was the strongest part of the book, it was just so emotionally strong and well conceived and just...why? Why did I even pretend to think and hope and pray that the ending would survive?

Posted by: annoyingmouse at August 5, 2009 5:25 PM

Terrible. "Properly"? Really?

Also: is the title of this post in reference to Clerks?

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at August 5, 2009 5:27 PM

What if they'd altered the ending in the original script, and that was what the test audiences responded poorly too - thus causing the filmmakers to realise their foolishness in tampering with the source material, and restoring the actual ending? Or, how about if, in a gloriously 'fuck you' manner, they've actually made the ending more depressing?

I know, I'm grasping.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at August 5, 2009 5:32 PM

I'm going to have to just agree with everyone who is now ready to kill something. The end of this book and, in particular, its tone, is a major part of why it's one of my favorites. Stupid, stupid me for thinking that there was even a chance in hell that the adaptation would resemble an utterly fantastic novel. I guess I'll just chalk this up as another reason not to watch this film, and hope that the general public doesn't latch on to the movie as they are often wont to do with poorly done, romantic comedies that lack content.

Posted by: ruby at August 5, 2009 5:44 PM

'finish it properly'. I think he meant 'finish it off'. Like, gun to the back of the head style.

Posted by: Odnon at August 5, 2009 5:45 PM

" ... they’re just there to give our reptile brains two-hour hand jobs."

Now I want one. A reptile brain and a two-hour hand job. I guess that's two, but my reptile brain can't count so good.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at August 5, 2009 5:58 PM

My new motto:

Oh blind fury, how I’ve missed you. It’s been a week or two since you last curled my hands into claws to rip furrows from my own flesh.

Nicely done, SLW. When we cease to rage we have ceased to care, and that is the end.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at August 5, 2009 6:01 PM

Somebody ought to make a movie that's just all happy endings (that isn't a porn). The dog finds his way home. The kid with cancer gets cured. The guy dumps his hot bitchy fiancee to marry the "plain" girl with the good heart. The aliens are defeated by something really, really simple just as the human race is on the edge of extinction. The action hero foils the nefarious plans of the bad guy and kicks his ass in a fight sequence so extravagantly edited it will cause seizures in many viewers. The executive guy realizes that family comes first and tells the big client in the crucial meeting to fuck off, then gets to his kid's Little League game just in time to see the kid hit a home run.

RE gp
"we need a comment diversion (but label it extra-SPOILERy) where we re-write the endings to movies.
because, you know, titanic didn't have to be so sink-y."

LOL... the sinkyness was the best part.

Posted by: Slash at August 5, 2009 6:30 PM

I should not have read this post.

My dog had 8 puppies a few weeks ago. 8 puppies that now I feel need to be punched in their fucking adorable faces.

Thanks Schwentke!

Posted by: ashes at August 5, 2009 6:49 PM

ShinyKate - Ouch! You go, girl.
figgy - So true!
gp - Of course, maybe Titanic would have been a bigger boxoffice smash if they'd have just given it a "proper" ending.

Question: Is it still an 'adaptation' when the orginal work has been rewritten?
Definition 'Adaptation': "Film adaptation is the transfer of a written work to a feature film. It is a type of derivative work."

You know Schwentke will just use this outcry as the reason to offer a special cut DVD with the alternate ending.

Posted by: Cyntia King at August 5, 2009 7:04 PM

La Fig, You generate an impressive amount of rage for someone who's supposed to be on vacation.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 5, 2009 7:29 PM

fine, maybe titanic was a bad example as that was based on history and history says the boat sinks. can't rewrite history (oh wait, they can, and will, and do.)

let's see, okay, how about the ending of thelma and louise? bit of a downer, cause of the, well, gravity.
what if we just have them make it to mexico? that's happier, right?

i mean, who will think of the MARGARITAS?

Posted by: gp at August 5, 2009 7:49 PM

My library has a new online service that lets you read an excerpt from the first chapter of a book you are considering checking out. It just saved me from (a) reading this book, and (b) exposing myself to this film. Technology rules.

Posted by: Poultice at August 5, 2009 7:54 PM

I hereby nominate gp and ashes as a tie for Eloquent Eloquence this week.

Of course since the award is for writing, their awards will be presented at an untelevised, separate ceremony; and a clip of them grinning and waving at the camera will be shown at the main awards ceremony while everyone is making a bathroom run.

Posted by: mswas at August 5, 2009 7:54 PM

I knew this looked like they had changed things around for the movie, but I didn't think they would go so far as to change the ending. That's fucking horrible, and I hope this movie causes some idiot to read the book, thinking it will be similar, but then gets so depressed by the ending that they off themselves, and the family sues Robert Schwentke for a hundred million dollars, and then he offs himself when he's bankrupt. It's the great circle of unlife.

Posted by: Snath at August 5, 2009 8:37 PM

Oh for fuck's sake! If Hollywood can kill the dog, they can use the proper ending for this movie.

Posted by: admin at August 5, 2009 8:49 PM

I don't think there are enough broad strokes to conserve the prime energy in Time Traveler's on the screen. I did finally get around to reading this, thanks Cannonballers, and really did love most of the book. I understand the whole feet thing, and wouldn't mind if they left it out of the movie. It won't translate on the screen, no doubt from what the trailer looks like. I still won't be seeing this movie, and really don't care if this gets a good movie. It is certainly one of those books worth more reading rather than watching.

Henry still is going to get it, don't you think? They just aren't gonna put McAdams through the BenjiButton machine. (To make this movie perfect, it would have a production budget comparable to B Button.)

Posted by: Jackseppelin at August 5, 2009 9:35 PM

To make this movie perfect, it would have a production budget comparable to B Button.

And it would deserve every penny of it. It deserves a better director and better screenwriters, too, while we're at it.

Unfortunately, Hollywood just saw:

(x + y) + z = ROMCOM PROFIT!

Where x = man, y = time traveling, and z = woman.

Posted by: Snath at August 5, 2009 11:45 PM

(x + y) + z = ROMCOM PROFIT!
Where x = man, y = time traveling, and z = woman.

Posted by: Snath at August 5, 2009 11:45 PM

If only hollywood arithmetic was as hard as real arithmetic...there would be no shit like this on the bigscreen.

Posted by: ashes at August 6, 2009 12:28 AM

For the love of God, NO!!! That final scene is so haunting, so heartwrenching... I can't believe they will fuck up this movie to such an extent. Those stupid, STUPID fuckers.

Posted by: Thijs at August 6, 2009 5:01 AM

Oh for fuck's sake! If Hollywood can kill the dog, they can use the proper ending for this movie.

Dog-killin' Hollywood died a long time ago.

That which remains -- what is called "Hollywood" today -- is naught but a weak-ass empty shell of a caricature of the former institution.

Posted by: Rykker at August 6, 2009 6:30 AM

Yeah, women HATE sappy tragic love stories. That's why "The Notebook" and "Moulin Rouge!" were such failu-- OH WAIT, NO THEY FUCKING WEREN'T.

I can't even believe they would change the book's (fucking perfect) ending. KILL KILL KILL.

Posted by: teacupnosaucer at August 6, 2009 1:14 PM

Awesome. The director has changed this from a movie I was kinda iffy on, to something I will not pay a fucking penny to see. Maybe when it comes on cable in a year or so, I'll try to watch it. Mr. Schwentke, kiss my money goodbye, you dumb fuck.

Posted by: sugar booger at August 6, 2009 2:22 PM

Great. And here I was hoping this movie might make up for the horrendous changes made in "My Sister's Keeper". Another book to movie fail.

Posted by: maribear at August 6, 2009 8:50 PM

I've just finished reading the book for the second time and knew they'd have to cut some parts, but they've cut the heart out. I have to pass on this to make my personal twelve dollar stand against Hollywood completely FUBAR-ing a great story and having the audacity to say they're doing the proper thing.

Posted by: Evie at August 7, 2009 9:39 PM

This makes my soul bleed.

Posted by: Clementine Bojangles at August 8, 2009 1:09 AM

This is completely disgusting- going and changing the book this much. The entire point of the book is the theme of time and longing. Clare must wait for Henry "her entire life". Taking out the scene when she is in her eighties and making a happy ending to please an audience who hasn't even read the book and want a happy hollywood ending is gross. Think of the people who have read the book and will be totally disappointed. I just can't believe the author allowed this to happen. I don't even want to see the movie now. >:[

Posted by: Alexandra at August 8, 2009 9:37 PM

FUCKKKK YOUUUUUU!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Lauri at August 8, 2009 9:38 PM

They made an happy, emotional ending to make the big bucks. Utterly Fucked up!

Posted by: Brandill G. at August 8, 2009 9:42 PM

UMMM...NOT seeing it.

Posted by: ughh at August 8, 2009 9:45 PM

Do we actually know for a fact that the film now has a happy ending? I seem to remember reading that the ending shown in the test screenings differed from the one in the book. Maybe the changes they've made actually make the film truer to the book.

Robert Schwentke wrote and directed a German film called "Eierdiebe", which was inspired by his own battle with testicular cancer. It's a black comedy, but has a very bittersweet ending. He's not a director who shies away from depicting sadness and despair.

Posted by: anna at August 9, 2009 8:23 AM

Funny how many people here think they are so smart, yet they can't seem to leave a comment that isn't laced with so much foul language I want to grab a bar of Lifebouy soap.

Personally, I could not disagree with you guys more. The author created the novel to bash romance and love because the poor wittle thing got jilted. Now that I know the movie doesn't end the way the book does - which was depressing as hell, I will probably watch it. It isn't about being illiterate - it is the fact that real life sucks enough - we go to the movies to escape it. For a short time, we can live vicariously through the happiness on the screen. What is so happy about poor Clare waiting all her life for one last brief moment with Henry? So before you all go and label people illiterate, or "twats", or label people AT ALL - why don't you try to understand how people feel? Or have you all forgotten how to empathize?

Posted by: Sam Jessup at August 9, 2009 10:00 AM

Take away all the art and literature inspired by getting jilted, and there wouldn't be much left.

There are plenty of happy movies already out there, for those who are so inclined. Aristotle was the first person we know of who wrote about catharsis, or the purging of negative emotions through the viewing of tragic dramas. This concept is a bit much for modern Hollywood, however.

Posted by: Linden at August 10, 2009 1:43 AM

I am fairly fairly certain from my inside source that everyone who is supposed to die still does. It's the VERY END, that beautiful coda we all know and love, that's gone and replaced with GOD KNOWS WHAT DISNEYFIED BULLSHIT.

Posted by: Kari at August 10, 2009 5:37 PM

Actually, I am surprised that "modern Hollywood" didn't end the movie with Henry telling Clare that he is really attracted to men and wants a divorce.

Posted by: jessupto21 at August 10, 2009 11:31 PM

First of all, its ridiculous to change the ending of a movie based on a popular novel from a tragedy to a Happily Ever After Fairytale. That out of the way...Am I the only one who HATED Claire & Henry for having a biological child? A kid that will grow up disappearing and landing stranded and naked god knows where or when?! I was just so pissed off at the characters at that point, I could barely care about them. Otherwise, I would have had a good sob-fest along with Claire after she looses and then waits her entire life for Henry! I'd like to think that if they cut out anything it was the daughter, but I already know that they did not. My bet is Claire sees Henry one last time while she is still Young and Beautiful, of course. Sort of like the corny ending at the end of the corny Pirates Of the Carribean III.

Posted by: toasty at August 13, 2009 7:38 PM

Was I ever pissed that they changed the ending! But I am comforted that when it comes out on DVD it might be included. Alternate endings often are. Why on earth did the audience not like it?!

Posted by: Jerri Willmore at August 18, 2009 8:38 PM

how about this? i just heard they are going to be making the movie into a tv series....based on the movie? based on the book? i don't know...

Posted by: Carrie at August 19, 2009 12:09 AM

I am amending the last post. The movie and it's ending actually weren't bad. The acting was great. Had I not read the novel I'd have liked it much more. A lot of people are pissed off.

A TV series? If they get it right, WONDERFUL!

Posted by: Jerri Willmore at August 19, 2009 6:05 PM

Carrie - they have already tried that series - it was called Journeyman - and it wasn't bad, but apparently didn't have enough viewers.

Posted by: jessupto21 at August 20, 2009 11:14 PM