web
counter
 

The Sherlock Holmes Sequel Gets a Title, and the Movie Blog Nerds Send the Rumor Mill Off the Rails

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (30)



sherlock-holmes-robert-downey-jr-naked-in-bed.jpg

Let’s start with what we do know, and that’s the new title for the Sherlock Holmes sequel, which is set to star Robert Downey, Jr., Jude Law, Jared Harris, Stephen Fry, and Noomi Rapace. It’s called: Sherlock Holmes and A Game of Shadows.

That’s not only mesmerizingly vague and unhelpful, but it breaks the Sherlock Holmes rules of titling.

However, the new Sherlock Holmes title does tie-in to the snorting, frothing-at-the-mouth, hump-your-computer-monitor scuttled butt going around the movie blog interwebs, which right now is centering on Guy Ritchie. Ritchie, who is not only working on the Sherlock Holmes sequel, but is tied to a remake of Excalibur. He has now been asked to step in and direct the prequel to 300, according to Vulture. Like 300, Xerxes is based on a Frank Miller graphic novel and it was originally developed by 300 director, Zack Snyder.

Now, here’s where it gets interesting. The reason the gig is being offered to Ritchie, instead of Zack Snyder, is not entirely because Snyder is too busy with Superman: Man of Steel (and because time is about to run out on the rights to the property). It’s because research screenings for Snyder’s upcoming Sucker Punch have been less than stellar. Again, according to Vulture, one Warner’s exec stated, “”It was bad; like, really bad. They’re [Warners brass] really not happy with it over there.” Add that to the apparent third act problems with Superman: Man of Steel, the underwhelming receptions for Watchmen and that animated owl movie, and it looks like we have a director problem. That’s not exactly what you want to hear about the guy trying to reboot Superman, after the latest mostly unsuccessful effort. The man has style, but there’s no there there. He’s like the super-slo-mo Brett Ratner.

Of course, there was also a bullshit rumor floated around last week over at Bad Ass Digest from Devin Faraci (normally, the sourpuss who calls out bullshit rumors) that Guy Ritchie was also up for directing a remake of Cannonball Run. According to that rumor, Ritchie was not aware that he was tied to the remake, but in a weird twist — despite his lack of knowledge of the project — he wanted George Clooney for the Burt Reynolds role.

Make of that what you will.

My suggestion: Ritchie should take the casts of Xerxes and Sherlock Holmes, and enroll them in a All-Star Laff-A-Lympics version of the Cannonball Run in which those two teams are pitted against The Avengers. That’s three movies and a cartoon. I call that the perfect studio remake.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Adjustment Bureau Clips | Primal Review: Hello, My Treacherous Friends









Comments

There is no Holmes but Cumberbatch.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 16, 2011 10:59 AM

What are the Sherlock Holmes rules of titling?

Posted by: The Mutt at February 16, 2011 10:59 AM

Sherlock Holmes and Zeke Couldn't Give A Shit would be a more apt title. I seem to be the only one who hated the first Holmes. Minutes after leaving the cinema I told my then-girlfriend it wasn’t gonna work out between us; she left crying and I watched a pigeon use a zebra crossing. I had a better time during that part of the day.

Posted by: zeke the pig at February 16, 2011 11:00 AM

And why, exactly, are we remaking Excalibur?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 16, 2011 11:04 AM

"And why, exactly, are we remaking Excalibur?"

Because cinema is dead.

Posted by: Will at February 16, 2011 11:06 AM

is tied to a remake of Excalibur.

Uh no. He's not gonna find anyone that can top Helen Mirren as sexy, deviant, dangerous Morgana nor Nigel Williamson as a weird, out-there Merlin.

As for Snyder and Sucker Punch problems/Watchmen problems/etc...I like him visually and stylistically but he needs to find a strong writing partner that can give his sauce some meat. I'm less worried about Man of Steel because, so far, there's no footage filmed whatsoever -- so it can be fixed.

Posted by: Fredo at February 16, 2011 11:08 AM

"Uh no. He's not gonna find anyone that can top Helen Mirren as sexy, deviant, dangerous Morgana nor Nigel Williamson as a weird, out-there Merlin."

I swear if I see Sienna Miller anywhere near this I'm gonna fucking frag somebody. On the other hand we'll probably get the Statham.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 16, 2011 11:11 AM

Am I the only one who's not backlashing on Snyder? Has he shown some sort of flashes of brilliance that I missed, or is everyone looking for things that aren't there. The dialogue in 300 was gut bustingly awful, but it looked cool. Watchmen was apparently not true enough to the novel, and blah blah, for me it was a little slow, but I was completely engrossed after it got going. He has a distinctive visual style, and he's sticking to projects that lend themselves more to flash than plot and character development. Relax.

Posted by: Ian at February 16, 2011 11:18 AM

Day Of The Dead wasn't terrible. 300 & Watchmen were cool. Haven't seen the owl movie but it looks nifty. All of those films have made money. Now dude has an original property & a Superman update in the pipeline. Sounds like dude's doing fine.

Posted by: the new transported man at February 16, 2011 11:29 AM

Ian, I watched that animated owl movie and enjoyed it, but I swear I could hear him desperately trying to hold back the need for slow motion, must put slow motion in the movie, must have SLOW MOTION RAIN SEQUENCE SLOOOOOW MOOOOTION.

Seriously, the guy has an issue with speed, and amazingly not of the pharmaceutical kind. Maybe. I don't know.

There is no Holmes but Cumberbatch.

I am a huge RDJ fan, but I gotta agree with this.

Posted by: twig at February 16, 2011 11:31 AM

I could most definitely see The Statham reprising Williamson's role as Merlin.

"A dream ... to some. ::long beat:: A NIGHTMARE TO OTHERS!"

Posted by: The Wanderer at February 16, 2011 11:32 AM

i liked the owl movie because it took itself seriously and wasn't constantly winking and nodding and breaking into a pop tune. the kiddies don't get that too often.

Posted by: idleprimate at February 16, 2011 11:37 AM

I can keep ignoring that Holmes like I'll ignore any "remake Excalibur" though it probably wouldn't really be a remake, it'd just use the title for a different story but call itself a remake to try to fool me, like "Clash Of The Titans", which I ignored.

Yeah, I just hope a Superman movie gets made by someone.

Cumberbatch.

Posted by: Jay at February 16, 2011 11:50 AM

Cucumberpatch.

Posted by: Vi at February 16, 2011 12:56 PM

Excalibur remake?! Oh.............wait. NO!

Posted by: Lordninja at February 16, 2011 12:57 PM

The Maltese Falcon
Ben Hur
The Magnificent Seven
The Fly
The Thing
Scarface

Yeah, remakes sure suck, don't they?

Posted by: The Mutt at February 16, 2011 1:42 PM

You know, I think I may be alone here, but I actually like the idea of Jason Statham getting cast in an Excalibur remake (well, if we HAVE to have one). But let's make things interesting and cast him...

As Morgana Le Fay.

Posted by: Wintermute at February 16, 2011 1:52 PM

I second that, wintermute.

Posted by: twig at February 16, 2011 2:21 PM

In fact, let's take that idea to its logical conclusion and invert the genders of the entire cast. Helen Mirren as Merlin, Gemma Arterton as Arthur, maybe someone like Tom Felton as Guinevere...

Thoughts? Thrown Stones? Vituperation? Casting suggestions?

Posted by: Wintermute at February 16, 2011 2:28 PM

Helen Mirren as Merlin

Well it's not like she couldn't kick ass at it. I mean damn.

Posted by: twig at February 16, 2011 2:32 PM

@twig

Exactly. And it would at least be a fresh take on things... and it would give the cast a chance to stretch themselves... subvert everyone's expectations a little and try something new.

Posted by: Wintermute at February 16, 2011 2:36 PM

It goes against my DNA to make any argument against a round table full of badass noble women in armor.

Posted by: twig at February 16, 2011 3:08 PM

What Mrs. Julien said. Sorry RDJ, but Mr. Bendy-dick Cum-on-my-Baps outclasses you in the Holmes department.

Posted by: Aislinn at February 16, 2011 4:07 PM

What are the Sherlock Holmes rules of titling?

Posted by: The Mutt at February 16, 2011 4:53 PM

What are the Sherlock Holmes rules of titling?

Posted by: The Mutt at February 16, 2011 4:53 PM

I'm not an expert (hell, I barely of a passing knowledge of Holmes), but most, if not all, his titles don't include the "Sherlock Holmes" part. I suppose a more correct title would just be "A Game Of Shadows".

But that would probably confuse most people who aren't familiar with the stories. At least based on the title alone. Once the trailers are released, it would probably clear it up.

Posted by: Kargoyle at February 16, 2011 5:13 PM

/\"barely have" not of.

It's been a long day.

Posted by: Kargoyle at February 16, 2011 5:15 PM

The Excalibur remake will have Gwyneth Paltrow as Morgana and Johnny Depp as Merlin... "as you've never seen him before!"

Major US box office... Or flop.

Posted by: JoJo at February 16, 2011 5:26 PM

Well thanks, JoJo... now I'm both disappointed and disheartened.

And wondering if I can somehow pull together a hundred million or so in funding to give MY idea a try. *grin*

Posted by: Wintermute at February 16, 2011 5:29 PM

There is no Holmes but Cumberbatch.

Cumberbitches FTW.

Sorry RDJ, I loves you and all but....

Posted by: Jules at February 16, 2011 10:45 PM

Cucumberpatch.

Posted by: Vi at February 16, 2011 12:56 PM

--------

I burst.

Posted by: zeke the pig at February 17, 2011 5:11 AM