web
counter
 

Right and Wrong. It Means Something. We Just Don't Know What

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (30)



the-runaways-movie-image-1-512x769.jpg

One of the more frustrating issues with Sundance movies — indeed, most indie movies — is that, especially during this time of the year, we devote a lot of copy to these movies because they’re often the more interesting kinds of movies to discuss. They have the better premises, the better performances, and the better hooks. The frustrating part about that usually is, despite the talent often involved, and despite the promising careers of many of the upstart directors, these movies that we’ve devoted a lot of attention to will usually come and go with barely a note about their per screen average in the box-office report.

Besides Buried, which we’ve already covered this morning, another one of the high-profile Sundance pics is The Runaways, based on the late ’70s all girl punk outfit that included members Joan Jett and Lita Ford. Why is it interesting to us? Because it concerns an influential rock group, because it stars two of the better young actresses today (Kristen Stewart and Dakota Fanning) and, because, really, the marketing folks behind it are pushing the sex angle down our throats in what is really an uncomfortable manner, considering the age of one of its major stars (Fanning is still 16, y’all). That cherry — of the Runaways’ biggest break-out hit, “Cherry Bomb” — is front-and-center in the marketing, and you know that the people behind this movie aren’t making any attempts to play down the Kristen Stewart/Dakota Fanning make-out scene. Let me demonstrate with the movie poster and a few images from the film that were released over the weekend:

the-runaways-movie-image-1-.jpg

the-runaways-movie-image-5-512x340.jpg

the-runaways-movie-image-6-512x769.jpg

Runaways-Poster.jpg

A glistening cherry and the tagline, “It’s 1975 and they’re about to explode.” Really? It’s good to know that the indie folks aren’t above exploitation, either. Here’s the thing, though: I don’t care how many pedo-friendly images they churn out, or how many times they get that make-out scene onto YouTube, in the end, nobody is going to see this movie. Remember the Dakota Fanning rape movie? Of course you don’t. It took 18 months to sell and was basically dumped into two theaters for one weekend. The Runaways will likely fare better than that, but not by much, and perhaps for good reason. The word from the first screening over the weekend is that The Runaways isn’t a very good movie. And if this clip, just released, is the best of the movie they have, then I’m inclined to believe the lukewarm reception:









Naomi Watts Signs On to Dream House | Burke and Hare Adds Isla Fisher and Tom Wilkinson













Comments

Remember the Dakota Fanning rape movie?

Hounddog, wasn't it? I didn't see it, but I remember all too well the stink surrounding that project.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at January 25, 2010 11:53 AM

Pffffffffft.. Kristen looks as "hard" as my Golden Retriever.

Seriously, this shit looks like little girls playing dress up with their big sisters closet.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 25, 2010 11:58 AM

Pffffffffft.. Kristen looks as "hard" as my Golden Retriever.

Jesus. Keep that shit to yourself buddy, before someone calls the Humane Society on your ass.

Posted by: Skewicide Blonde at January 25, 2010 12:02 PM

I respect Dakota Fanning's efforts to take on challenging roles that are going to stretch our perception of her as an actress but I'm still horrified that the little angel is going to be sexualized in any way, shape or form.

Posted by: becks at January 25, 2010 12:11 PM

Those leather and swede tan shoes "Cherrie" is wearing up there? Those
were *the* shoes to have when I was going into middle school. Hawt!

Posted by: Ms MoMo at January 25, 2010 12:12 PM

Ick. I feel like they cut off that clip just before the scene switches to a shot of Stewart and Fanning in their underwear in a shabby, wood-paneled basement as an unseen middle-aged man gives them breathless directions.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at January 25, 2010 12:13 PM

Er. That would be leather and SUEDE shoes. Maybe made in Sweeden...?

Posted by: Ms MoMo at January 25, 2010 12:14 PM

laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame.

Posted by: gem at January 25, 2010 12:14 PM

Tracer you hit the nail right on the head.

Honestly, I'm disappointed. Despite the inclusion of Kristen Stewart, whose mopey face makes me cringe, I was really looking forward to this movie. This looks like shit.
Dakota Fanning is not even a smidge believable in this scene.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at January 25, 2010 12:17 PM

"pushing ... down our throats in what is really an uncomfortable manner"

That's what she said.

Posted by: Bendiagram at January 25, 2010 12:18 PM

Yeah, Kristen looks about as hard as a Golden Retriever, especially in that second picture where they're standing by the jukebox.

Dakota looks pretty hot in that jumpsuit in the first picture, though. And now I'll wash my mouth out with soap, bleach my eyes, and report directly to jail. And I'm a girl, not a dirty old man. But that's just wrong.

Posted by: MM at January 25, 2010 12:21 PM

Whoever is in charge of Fanning's career should take a pause and reeeeeeeeeeeeeaaally think of how they are going to transition her into a adult roles. The whole hooker thing ain't workin'. And she's tittering very close to McCauley Caulkin territory now.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 25, 2010 12:22 PM

When I saw a clip of that dude in the original trailer I got all excited that Eddie Izzard was going to be in this movie. I think he could have helped them actually pull off the tone it would need. Sadly I was mistaken.

Posted by: Eep at January 25, 2010 12:41 PM

On a completely unrelated note, let me take this opportunity to remind you that the Pajiba Book Club will be reading Lolita this month. For more details see the Cannonball Read facebook page. Thank you.

Posted by: Yossarian at January 25, 2010 1:34 PM

I'm a girl, and I am not sexually attracted to Dakota in any way. Having that said, I'm not that shocked, concerned, nor do I feel dirty about watching her in this role. I think she looks like Cherie, and maybe she'll pull it of!
I think the movie will be mediocre, but because of the marketing and all the twimorons out there it will make a lot of money. Hell.. I'll probably end up watching it.
But we always complain about old people playing younger.. Now they cast a girl the age the character is supposed to be and we think it's wrong?? I say, Dakota, go for it!!

Posted by: Mariazinha at January 25, 2010 1:52 PM

On a completely unrelated note, let me take this opportunity to remind you that the Pajiba Book Club will be reading Lolita this month.

All hail Yossarian, the Lord of Segue.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at January 25, 2010 2:05 PM

As someone who doesn't generally think Kristen Stewart is hot, I think these two together are really hot. Not sure about the movie, but I'm keeping my mind open. The real-life protagonists seem to have had some input which I think is a good sign.

Maybe the ick factor is a cultural thing. The age of consent here in the UK is 16 and most people have sex before or around that age. Generally the few people who didn't have sex until they were over 18 were going through awkward/ugly phases and just couldn't get sex any earlier.

Posted by: Fiona at January 25, 2010 2:19 PM

Which bands cite the Runaways as "influential"? My extraordinarily vague memory of them from The Day is that they influenced a large case of "dog walking on its hind legs" syndrome.

Look! They're chicks! YOUNG chicks! And they play their own instruments! ... kinda, and they play punk songs! ... but not very well but we'll cut them FUCKING HUMONGULOUS amounts of slack because ... well, they're kinda hot, and hot chicks always always always get the benefit of the doubt.

Which explains about 90 percent of our modern culture.

Posted by: , at January 25, 2010 3:20 PM

A) when did Kristen Stewart become one of the better actresses? Did a bunch of others die off and I missed the memo?

B) Is it just me or is the blonde one's head kinda... freakishly HUGE in that first shot? It's making me concerned. For myself. And for her. Because she might fall.

Posted by: Gabs at January 25, 2010 3:37 PM

Same here, Fiona. Most European countries have the age of consent at 16 or even younger, so...whatever, Dakota, go get yours. And who among you (young, old, male, female, gay, straight) would say no to Joan Jett anyway?

I'll probably watch it whenever the hell it makes it to the UK.

Posted by: Joker at January 25, 2010 3:44 PM

Thank you Gabs! Even in the trailer for this craptastic movie she's doing what KStew always does: bites her lip and pretends that all it takes to act. Oy vey.

Posted by: AlannaJudith at January 25, 2010 4:24 PM

No. Not only is the subject matter completely uninteresting, but the ick factor is a little much. What's next...the rape and murder of a little girl?

...wait...

I mean...a couple of white guys on trial for killing a little black girl...

...damnit...

A middle-aged man seducing his underage stepdaughter?

...fuck...I give up.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at January 25, 2010 4:25 PM

The Runaways were simply not very good. "Cherry Bomb" was OK but I defy anyone to get through an entire Runaways album without skipping anything.

Posted by: Dr. Remulak at January 25, 2010 4:31 PM

Agreed. Just because this is an indie with big name stars doesn't make it good. Sometimes the performances by no-names in independent films are what make it good--they have a very raw quality. Since we are already familiar with Stewart and Fanning (egads she's seriously 16!?) we know they are just going to be acting. Blaaahhh.

For my money, I'd rather watch What We Do is Secret. Gives good background to the 70s LA punk scene and is much more engaging.

Can you tell I don't want to see this? Yea I'm playing movie snob.

Posted by: grace b at January 25, 2010 6:27 PM

There's no "ick" factor...seriously, this is Pajiba not, er.....Puritan-jiba.

(You can use that)

Posted by: stryker1121 at January 25, 2010 11:36 PM

I was way into the punk\ new wave scene way back when. I didn't like the Runaways then, don't now. As has already been said twice already, they were simply not a good band.

Joan Jett went on to make some great music. I even saw her live once and had a great time, but she was the only one that was at all salvageable in that band. Lita Ford was hysterically bad hair metal.

Posted by: imk at January 26, 2010 12:37 PM

"The age of consent here in the UK is 16 and most people have sex before or around that age. Generally the few people who didn't have sex until they were over 18 were going through awkward/ugly phases and just couldn't get sex any earlier."

The age of consent isn't about preventing teens from having sex, it's about preventing those who are legally adults from having sex with teens (for the most part).

Posted by: samantha t at January 26, 2010 3:43 PM

Even if Dakota Fanning is a blonde pedophile favorite, there is no denying that she is very hot!

Posted by: Jerry at January 26, 2010 8:19 PM

Well, there's no denying it if you're a pedophile.

Posted by: becks at January 26, 2010 9:17 PM

Those old school Mountain Dew bottles are making me crave some of that sweet sweet redneck juice that is my crack.

Posted by: taylor at February 3, 2010 6:33 PM

















mindholeblowers.gif viral_hits.gif
>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time