web
counter
 

The Reprehensible Sexualization of Rape

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (101)



spitgrave1_071210.jpg

Three years ago, after I had a kid, a lot of the commenters razzed me and suggested that I’d mellow out. In my mind, I told them to go fuck themselves, but they were right. There’s still quite a bit that will get my ire up, but my default setting is no longer quiet, bubbling rage (that’s TK’s territory these days). You have a kid and the unicorns and rainbows come out, and it’s harder to hold a muzzleloader to the world.

I no longer want to kill everyone, but I still want to murder the people behind the I Spit on Your Grave remake in the face. And the neck. And in the junk. I know I’m a broken record on this, but the movie poster for the film came out, and even though I told myself I wouldn’t speak of the remake again — because in doing so, it inadvertently promotes it — I can’t help myself. Because my lips curled, and my hands started to tremble like a goddamn nursing home geriatric trying to button his sweater vest. I even slept on it, thinking the feeling might subside, but when I woke up this morning and caught another glance at the movie poster, I wanted to cause malicious, violent harm to director Steven R. Monroe and everyone at Anchor Bay Entertainment responsible for this bullshit. Because as bad as the original film was — and no movie has ever made me as homicidal as that 1978 film — at least the movie poster highlighted the fact that it was supposed to be a feminist revenge flick, even if it was the absolute farthest thing from that.

This new poster, which pays homage to the original movie poster, doesn’t even get that right: It pays lip service with the very small “Day of the Woman” caption tucked away in the lower right hand corner. But otherwise, the only thing you can say for this poster is that it sexualizes a rape victim. And not just any rape victim, but a woman who is brutally gang raped by several men and left for dead. And they show the bruises and the dirt and the dried blood, but they make goddamn sure that they also airbush that ass. Because the assholes who put together this poster want to titillate you; they want you to see the movie, not because this woman takes revenge on her rapists, but because this hot lady with a nice ass gets gang-raped on a rock. That is the only explanation for this movie poster. It’s inexplicable. It’s fucked up. And they make motherfucking sure to highlight the fact that it’s unrated, as if to say to the redneck assholes who get off on this bullshit: She’s gonna get raped real good. Those fucking troglodytic peons: Jump up my ass. Die in a house fire. And not from the blazes, you shitheels, but slowly from smoke inhalation. And I hope, while you’re coughing up your goddamn lungs, someone is standing behind you and shoving a bar stool up your ass. This bullshit is inexcusable.

Here’s the movie poster, and for anyone that sports wood at the sight of this woman’s ass: 1) Get a life, 2) Don’t be so fucking pathetic, and 3) I hope you stub your dick in the door.

_1278966237.jpg









Machete Character Posters Will Beat Your Ass | ¿Quien Es Mas Macho? | Where Have All The Good Times Gone | True Blood: "9 Crimes" (S3/E4)













Comments

Me too Dustin - you're not alone.

Posted by: sara at July 13, 2010 9:44 AM

This deserves an "O.M.G." So fucking wrong.

Posted by: sars at July 13, 2010 9:44 AM

I tend to reserve my anger for certain things...and this raises my ire...so, with that said.

Steven Monroe...I hope your wife crashes into a gas truck, and it's a pity you didn't suffer a crib death.

Posted by: PissBoy at July 13, 2010 9:47 AM

Your outrage is, to use an overused word in its proper context, awesome. Especially this early in the day.

Posted by: , at July 13, 2010 9:48 AM

What. The. Hell? Didnt anyone in the marketing room say 'Wait hang on a minute, this is actually a bit sick and wrong?' or were they too busy eyeing up their cheques?

Posted by: Nieve 'The Threadkiller Queen' at July 13, 2010 9:49 AM

I'm going to stand outside my local googleplex on Oct. 8. and anyone who says they just came from I Spit On Your Grave gets the hammer. We gon' have us a big ol' HAMMA PAHDY. Jes we is, jes we is.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at July 13, 2010 9:55 AM

thank you, dustin. i like pajiba the most when it's not just criticizing bad movies, but also examining and slamming the machine and cultural elements that create and encourage them.

Posted by: celery at July 13, 2010 9:56 AM

So we've graduated from torture-porn to torture-rapey-porn.

*SIGH

Yeah...thanks to the trend of many of the recent threads, I'm all raped out. The movie looks like a sociopath's wet dream, and I can only hope there aren't enough sick fucks out there with disposable income to make this into another sub-genre. May this suffer a very quick death.

Poop.

Posted by: bleujayone at July 13, 2010 9:57 AM

Just.


Just SO BEYOND WORDS. CAPLSOCK RAGE. JUST GOING TO MASH THE KEYBOARD. BEYOND MUCH MORE. THSEIFDGSDFMKL;BVSFUO;AERUO;SVJUVBSDASOECCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNCUNTFUCKANAJL;ASGUI;IVBFBASO/GRSBRMZV\SVSW/'

HIT.SEND.HNOW.BYE ALL.

Posted by: Nadine at July 13, 2010 9:58 AM

TracerBullet I loved your comment.

Posted by: sara at July 13, 2010 9:59 AM

Brings up the image from The Unborn poster to me (http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/3400000/The-Unborn-Movie-Poster-International-odette-yustman-3436235-540-800.jpg) which was clearly designed to raise some sexual feelings. In the context of THIS totally unnecessary remake this poster is disgusting. Thank you Dustin, you should send this blurb of yours to the film makers/producers/ studio.

Posted by: petalfrog at July 13, 2010 9:59 AM

Uhh, where's the blood running down her inner leg? Where are the bite marks left by the rapists? Where are the fingernails hanging on by a thread and the broken digits mangled from fighting off her attackers?

Fucking amateurs.

Posted by: Kballs at July 13, 2010 10:04 AM

Well said, boss. I think you've got plenty of rage left in the tank for this pile of garbage.

Oh, and just in case this didn't really drive home how fucked up this whole idea is (remaking a film that centered on a graphic rape and then marketing it by glorifying/sexualizing that rape), I jumped over to IMDB just to see the actors names. Out of curiosity, I scrolled down to the message boards, despite knowing that those are the sewage backups of humanity.

The first post listed has the following header:

Will Jennifer(Sarah Butler) be nude in this?

And people wonder why I'm the way I am.

Posted by: TK at July 13, 2010 10:08 AM

So, this one's over the tipping point?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at July 13, 2010 10:10 AM

This is just sick

Another thing what makes me feel ill like this is the rape condom. Not because of the jagged teeth and a Doctor having to remove it from tiny little rapist peen, but for the fact that women are living lives where the fear of being raped is such harsh reality that measures like this aren't even considered extreme. No one should have to bear trap their bajingo!

A women shouldn't have to arm her vagina in case the scary menfolk get on up in it. Convicted rapists should have to have 'I am a Rapist, please fist me in the facehole' tattooed on their foreheads (same goes for pedophiles)

Or better yet, how about all males are forced to wear Saw-like mini guillotine contraptions on their junk poised at the read to chop the minute any forced sexual activity goes on?

Trust me, the rate of rape will go down like THAT *click*

*End feminist rant, stamps out burning bra*

Posted by: Camilla at July 13, 2010 10:11 AM

"When you look at this poster, what do you see?"

The perfect litmus test for an asshole.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at July 13, 2010 10:12 AM

That is disturbing on so many different levels that it defies reasoned explanation. I'm just going to assume Mel Gibson had approval authority on this one.

Posted by: admin at July 13, 2010 10:19 AM

It is a sick, sad world that will not only see this project green-lit by studio execs but that it would be completed and then marketed in such a sad, disgusting manner.
Let's be real though.
The internet is brimming with porn of every imaginable type - including simulated "rape style" gangbangs - and people are becoming more and more desensitized. I would say this applies especially to the mouth-breathing cousin humpers who will line up at the googolplex to see this piece of shit.
You can't regulate the internet and you can't stop the Hollywood Shit Machine from cranking out this kind of stuff. All we can do is voice our outrage and urge people not to patronize it.
You have done well on that score, Mr. Rowles.
Let us all pick up the cry.

Posted by: Spender at July 13, 2010 10:23 AM

Thanks for posting this, Dustin. I hear enough shit about women from men I forget there are actually a few of y'all out there who getting pissed the fuck off by a completely disgusting act of disrespect and objectification. This bullshit is deserving of righteous anger.

Posted by: Kayanne at July 13, 2010 10:24 AM

I can't really form words. Just red seething blindness and the need to punch and tear a scrotal sack belonging to the cock wallet shitbags that made this poster.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at July 13, 2010 10:31 AM

it doesn't even make me angry, it just makes me incredibly sad. Because there are so many people out there who don't think there is anything wrong with this or, even worse, are aroused just because a woman's ass is hanging out.
And it feels defeating, knowing that things like this will only outrage the few, rather than the many.

Posted by: ninetwenteetoo at July 13, 2010 10:38 AM

Yeah, what Spender said. This is essentially another type of porn. An unwelcome reminder that some people don't think there's much wrong with rape, especially simulated rape.

Posted by: Slash at July 13, 2010 10:40 AM

There are so many other creative choices that could have been made for this poster; color palettes unconsidered, grain sizes, perhaps a different background with a happy little tree. I mean, I like Photoshop's desaturation filter as much as the next hack graphic designer. But really, couldn't they try messing with the white balance or morphing her with a woolly mammoth, like those clever lads on the message board groups?

Posted by: Jim Doggie at July 13, 2010 10:48 AM

I was raped as a young girl (I am not telling anyone this for pity's sake but just for background information). I didn't tell anyone about it for a good chunk of my life; I repressed it and inadvertently caused myself much more psychological trauma when those memories came flooding back. Most days, I can handle thinigs like this. I value logic and reason and I try not to let the bastards get me down. But today, they won but only for a second. Sure, seeing this made some tears fall and I'll probably be in a funk for a little while but I won't really let it get to me. You see, I've been through a ton of therapy. Hard, painful therapy and it's made me stronger. My real revenge, the real day of the woman, for me, is every goddamned day that I fight to stay strong and make my place in this world. Victim, am I none. And so to the people who created this shit, the people who get off on rapey-torture-porn bullshit? You can just go fuck yourselves because I am way more badass and hardcore than you will ever be.

Posted by: AbbyNormal at July 13, 2010 10:48 AM

Oh, you're so damned evil, Mel! And YOU, Polanski, you're a child rapist bastard!! Pathetic little bitch Lindsey can do anything she wants & just gets a slap on the wrist!!! And now these disgusting perverts trying to sexualize rape!??!!

The oil spill, Proposition 8, Lady fucking GaGa, 'Last Airbender' - -

How the hell am I supposed to contain all this pent-up righteous indignation boiling over inside me?!??

PuhLEEEZZ, civilization, could ya stop being so douchebaggy for a little bit? This anger shit is wearing me out!

Posted by: toni at July 13, 2010 10:51 AM

Abby normal if we were in the same room you would see me applauding you right now. As it is Ill send love and vibes and Hell Yeahs! across the internet.

Posted by: Nieve 'The Threadkiller Queen' at July 13, 2010 10:53 AM

God bless you, Abby and stay strong.

Posted by: Spender at July 13, 2010 11:00 AM

I will say this, without condoning the film or those who wish to see it: If there is a market for something, there will be a product. Is the film morally reprehensible? Yes. I actually bought a copy on the advice of a friend (who is not my friend anymore) because Joe Bob Briggs did the audio commentary for the film.

Exploitation cinema has existed as long as there has been cinema. We can't condemn this film without condemning all the other exploitative films.

Dustin I agree with you that this film shouldn't be remade. I agree that it is trashy and exploitative and will more than likely cater to the guys who want to watch a graphic gangrape. There's no but forthcoming. I destroyed the copy I purchased on the advice of my ex-friend after getting through the first 20 minutes of the film. This film doesn't sit well with me. I for one won't have anything to do with it.

Posted by: bignick at July 13, 2010 11:01 AM

I saw the header pic and thought, "Well, it's a bit like a rough fashion shot but I don't think it's too out of line". Then I finished reading the article and saw the whole thing.

Good God Almighty, who's responsible for this? Did someone actually utter, "She's horribly brutalized but goddammit, she's going to look fucking hot".

I wasn't planning on seeing this (rape themes upset the shit out of me), but I'd rather blow a sawed off shotgun then watch a minute of this dreck.

Posted by: Kaleena at July 13, 2010 11:02 AM

Thanks Nieve & Spender. Now if only I could spell "things" correctly, I'd be set.

Posted by: AbbyNormal at July 13, 2010 11:02 AM

Dustin - I agree that the poster is an affront to humanity and that the losers who created it, okay'd it and get off on it should be sealed up in their mother's basement, subjected to an endless stream of Lady Gaga and then terminated with extreme prejudice.

However, I think that smoke inhalation is an easier way out than the fire licking at their bodies. (that's why when people were put on the bonfire there was a barrell nailed up above their heads to act as a chimney so that they couldn't inhale the smoke and pass out, instead they'd feel the full fury of the flames.)

Send them off to a small deserted island with absolutely NOTHING and let them starve to death! Hell, put them all together so they can cannibalize each other until only the strongest survives, and then put his ass on a plank and let the sawyers at him, starting at the toes.

As others have said, hopefully this flops major at the b.o. and this trend dies a quick death. (Followed by bone cancer for each of the dickwads who ok'd this up the line.)

Words fail me. (believe it or not)

Posted by: Uncle JR at July 13, 2010 11:08 AM

Question: is calling it "unrated" just an early promotional bait and switch, attempting to take advantage of the fact that the MPAA has not yet rated it when it will in fact eventually garner a rating before release? I ask because the last time I checked the vast majority of movie theaters in this country still refuse to exhibit unrated films, as mainstream newspapers and television stations as a rule do not advertise them during theatrical distribution. Money remains the bottom line for the studios, the distributors, and the theaters.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at July 13, 2010 11:11 AM

100% agree

Posted by: SarahReznor at July 13, 2010 11:39 AM

isn't sweet that Roman Polanski got out of house arrest just in time to enjoy this?

Posted by: rio at July 13, 2010 11:39 AM

HA! Oh Rio I really shouldnt laugh but I did.

Abby you spell how you want to spell chickee!

Posted by: Nieve 'The Threadkiller Queen' at July 13, 2010 11:46 AM

Abby, my heart goes out to you big time. If the people behind this piece of shit poster (or film, for that matter) were each 20 times the human beings they are, they still wouldn't add up to half of the hard core, badass, unbelievably fantastic human being that you are.

Now, I can get plenty pissed by looking at this poster thinking, "Wow. Someone thought it would be a good idea to sexualize a rape victim to boost ticket sales." But when I consider how actual rape/abuse survivors must feel when they see this shit...well, that's when I want to go Lisbeth from The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo on somebody's ass. Seriously, anyone have a taser and a tattoo gun I can borrow? I'm right here in Hollywood.

Posted by: ShinyKate at July 13, 2010 11:54 AM

Rotten, scum sucking, bastard pig-sons of pox-ridden whores, dickwad, fucktard, screaming douchebag assholes!

There's no escaping that we live in a rape culture. Anyone who has suffered this (or pays attention) will see the acceptance of rape tropes in mainstream media, and as long as they aren't pushed past a certain limit, most folks will pretend that's not what's going on right in front of them. That limit is reached* when you try to make an actual rape, or actual rape victim, into something inherently sexy. There is no one out there who doesn't know someone who was raped. The victim might not ever mention it, but trust me when I say there is nowhere you can go where you will not encounter someone who has suffered sexual assault.

One wonders if the victim in this movie had been a man who was brutally raped by a bunch of guys, would the poster try to sexy him up? No, I didn't think so. Because while we dehumanize women who have been raped by placing blame or equating the attack with sex instead of violence, we completely fucking ignore the fact that men get raped, too.


*for your average person with a reasonably stable mental state. Socio/psychopaths and other fucked up people may have a different reaction, and they're the target audience for this flick.

Posted by: Reba at July 13, 2010 12:13 PM

I used to visit Ain't It Cool once in a while in the early aughts, but never went back after reading their review of the movie Wrong Turn:

"Well, in a way the whole film suffers from not fucking the audience hard enough. I mean – first off, this is an R-rated Horror film, and there’s no T & A. Ok – a definite minus here… not only that, but hell, there isn’t even any grotesque titillation in the movie. When one female character is captured alive – well here you have the potential for HORROR. What would 3 Retarded InBred West Virginia Middle-Aged Hillbilly Mountain Men Family Cannibal’s do to a pretty little thing tied to their bed?"

It goes on from there, but I'll spare you. All these years later and I still remember reading that review and just gaping at the screen in disbelief. Seriously icky.

Posted by: kronos at July 13, 2010 1:13 PM

The original movie was a steel toed boot kick to the nuts of my soul, so I find it relatively unsurprising that anyone who thought it deserved to be revisited are pretty much the scum of the earth.

-frob

Posted by: frobme at July 13, 2010 1:15 PM

RE Reba
"Because while we dehumanize women who have been raped by placing blame or equating the attack with sex instead of violence, we completely fucking ignore the fact that men get raped, too."

Except for prison rape. People make jokes about that all the time. I get your point, just saying, people don't ignore rape against men, per se, they just don't care. You won't find too many people who say they don't care about rape of women and kids (except for Polanski's defenders, I guess), but lots of people don't care about rape in prison and will say so. And they assume that's where most male on male rape (that doesn't involve children) happens. Maybe they're right, I'm not sure on those numbers.

I think a mainstream movie about male on male rape wouldn't be sexed up because most men who rape, rape women, not other men. You could "sex up" a male on male rape story, but you'd be targeting an extremely small audience there. Hell, there probably are male on male rape-themed movies that actually market the rape part, but they're probably all porn. I assume they exist. Rule 34. Rape of women is simultaneously less acceptable (publicly) and more acceptable (privately). My theory, anyway.

Lots of men think lots of women secretly want to be raped, and to be fair, a lot of women express that fantasy. Of course, it's usually an extremely controlled fantasy. If they were to be actually raped, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't enjoy it at all.

Human sexuality is fucked up.

Posted by: Slash at July 13, 2010 1:18 PM

Thirty years ago, right out of college, as an optimistic and vocal feminist, I participated in Take Back the Night marches and protests against strip clubs and porn shops -- in ultra liberal San Francisco. I spray painted "Women are not Chicks" on a Harrah's billboard that depicted showgirls wearing feathers and heels. How naive. Today, those strip clubs are Gentlemen's Clubs, frequented by famous actors and atheletes. The "porn" plays nightly on my TV as "Girls Gone Wild." That Harrah's billboard is nothing -- so tame, wouldn't even raise an eyebrow.

I see an movie poster like this and think, how did we women let this happen? I can hear the thinking -- women are now empowered by their sexuality and are in control of their bodies. I have a 15 year old daughter. My heart breaks for her, sometimes. This is not the "empowerment" envisioned her.

Posted by: Stillnadine at July 13, 2010 1:25 PM

Abby, thank you for sharing with us. Your strength is an inspiration.

Posted by: Kayanne at July 13, 2010 1:33 PM

OK that just made my stomach churn. In a very real, not-at-all-exaggerating way. I'm disgusted. What the fuck is wrong with these people? and the people who are allowing this to be made and promoted?

And the worst thing is you KNOW they'll try to defend it. Like every asshole who has defended the original movie: and I'm sayign it flat-out: if you liked that movie, you're an asshole and a sick fuck. There's no other way around it. As is everyone involved in this fucking remake. It just makes me sick.

I just..."UNRATED". For a RAPE movie. WHAT THE FUCK?!

You know, I'm all against censoring in movies, but this is one where I would cheer on the protesters. Hell, I'd join them happily.

Posted by: figgy at July 13, 2010 1:50 PM

Here's the contact link for Anchor Bay Entertainment. You'll notice you can also email them directly regarding Children's DVD's, which made my stomach turn. Join me in emailing strong complaints and protests to this disgusting excuse for advertising. Then, pass it along to friends and have them do the same thing...

http://www.anchorbayentertainment.com/index.asp?p=Contact_Us

Posted by: Barnes78 at July 13, 2010 2:39 PM

The thing that annoys me the most is like...to be blunt, I know rape victims. Im sure a lot of the Pajibans do, and to be awful, I'm sure a few Pajibans and Pajibette's have suffered through rape or sexual abuse.


This?
Is a slap and a spit in the face of everyone who was ever raped, molested or made to feel endangered and violated.
Fuck these people. Fuck anyone who sees this film, fuck anyone who helped make it.

I do not believe for a second, Dustin, that you or any other Pajiban will see this film even to review it.

But if you do I'll have to actually murder you.

Posted by: Nadine at July 13, 2010 2:53 PM

That is juts so wrong in every level. It defies moral, goodness, sense, intellect and logic. The F&*^?!!! I don't wanna look at it again so I might be missing on the details but, my first thoughts seeing it were a) This is terribly messed up but I bet they gonna try to justify with "sexuality empower women" bull feces and b) how does whatever cloth or whatever covering her can so tactically uncover just that area like that? I have taken costume design and I know that every details are filled with an intent of one kind or other. And that whatever costume thingie's intent is so very clear that it bridges all fucking excuse they can try to hurl and shoot...in addition to whoever came up with this marketing idea, I enlist the people who is responsible for designing and constructing that piece of ARGGGGGGGGGGGGG, my wit is scorched with disgust!!! - Whoever made that stuff should drawn in blood of their dick!!!!

On tangent, I found a misspelling tat you probably would really like to correct: "airbush that ass" sound just wrong....I don't wanna go into it.

Posted by: yocean at July 13, 2010 3:04 PM

May everyone reponsible for this rot in the deepest, darkest pits of hell.

Posted by: Aislinn at July 13, 2010 3:04 PM

I just want to say, the across the board, to a Pajiban rage?

Is why I fucking love you people.


Fuck this movie

Posted by: Nadine at July 13, 2010 3:21 PM

RE Stillnadine
"I see an movie poster like this and think, how did we women let this happen? I can hear the thinking -- women are now empowered by their sexuality and are in control of their bodies. I have a 15 year old daughter. My heart breaks for her, sometimes. This is not the 'empowerment envisioned her."

The way I figure it, the pendulum swung way the other way. It used to be any sexual expression by women (ie to imply their enjoyment of sex) was awful and wrong, and now if you don't choose to "celebrate" your sexuality by joining in or at least noting approval of the other "empowered" women, you hate sex. So women still don't have much of a choice (that's an exaggeration, but not by a lot). If we don't agree that porn and the other forms of exhibitionism are the coolest, ultimate, most honest portrayal of sexuality out there, we not only hate sex, we hate men, because men love porn. If we don't agree that spreading it for Playboy or stripping (sorry: exotic dancing) is a celebration of our power and womanhood, we obviously aren't as enlightened as all those super-confident women out there flashing the beav and twirling around the pole.

Porn "stars" and strippers and the nekkid women in magazines have never struck me as particularly empowered or confident. But I'm just a woman, I must not know what I'm talking about. I'm not saying no sex worker enjoys the work, but I bet those people are in a distinct minority. Feigning enjoyment is part of the marketing. If women could make as much money slinging fries at McDonald's as they can stripping or doing porn, there would be a lot fewer strippers and porn workers.

BTW, I'm certainly not suggesting that women (and men) who work in the various sex industries should be scorned, but I sure would like it if - at least - people would acknowledge that porn is way more about money than sex. It's commerce. That's it. Porn isn't sex any more than Cheetos are food. I love Cheetos, but I wouldn't argue they are superior to every other food out there. But people who are into porn really seem to expect the rest of us to agree that it is superior to every other sexual expression and that if somebody doesn't particularly like porn, they must hate sex, as if the two are inextricably intertwined. Yeah, I'm well aware that depictions of sex go back literally thousands of years. Not really the same thing as porn and stripping, but thanks for playing.

Posted by: Slash at July 13, 2010 3:43 PM

I've lurked on this site for years, soaking up all the scathing-ness and bitchy-ness, but THIS is the reason I read this site. Knowing that there are people that can look at this for what it really is and rise above what the studios are trying to tell us. Knowing that there are people out there who see this and are as enraged as I am.

I'm proud to be a scathingly, bitchy pajiban! You people rock!

I'd say the execs that produced this should have to live it but I wouldn't wish that on anyone. I like Dustin's punishment better.

Posted by: banDanna at July 13, 2010 3:48 PM

Abby, I didn't see your post.

You rock.

Posted by: Nadine at July 13, 2010 3:51 PM

DarthCorleone, the submitted the movie to the MPAA who told them they had to make something like 100 and some odd cuts. The director and studio have decided to bypass the MPAA and go to the theater chains themselves to see if they can get it released unrated. Hopefully this means it will go straight to dvd as I cant think of any chain willing to release it without a rating.

Posted by: digitalboy at July 13, 2010 3:56 PM

I'm happy to see another man get upset about this shit. Too many think it's not cool to get upset about a picture and the message it sends. Believe me, it is very cool to get upset about it.

Posted by: Jonzo at July 13, 2010 4:04 PM

Dustin, I actually think I love you.

That is all.

Posted by: onewing at July 13, 2010 4:09 PM

I emailed Anchor Bay. Can't wait to see how they took my outraged chastisement.

Posted by: Chickaboom at July 13, 2010 4:11 PM

The thing that annoys me the most is that the people releasing this film will overlook the outrage and will comeback with an excuse like 'this is a rape revenge film! It's totally about empowerment and feminine revenge and her kicking ass!'
And will miss completely ALL OF THE HORROR OF WHAT THEY'RE DOING.
They will overlook our anger that the poster is, frankly, supposed to be sexy despite portraying what is a rape victim only hours, if that after the GANG RAPE.

I think this is going to get into The Accused territory.
When I wrote my dissertation one of the more interesting aspects was the voyeurism bent in The Accused; the way the rape scene was shot making, filming it almost entirely from the point of view of the men in the room making the audience feel like part of the crowd who stood by and watched a woman get gang raped.

A poster like this invites the audience to find a rape victim sexy which invites them to find RAPE sexy which invites them to blur the lines between, say, rough sex fantasy and out and out rape.

I'm not saying this film will change the world but the fact is the poster alone sends an alarmingly dangerous message about how 'we' should view rape victims- as sex objects.

And that is honestly one of the most frightening things Hollywood has ever done.

Posted by: Nadine at July 13, 2010 4:28 PM

I just sent over this little screed to the folks at Anchor Bay:

Is this honestly the kind of publicity your company is looking for?
http://www.pajiba.com/trade_news/the-reprehensible-sexualization-of-rape-i-spit-on-your-grave-remake-poster-.php#comments

Congratulations, you're somehow managed to make a deplorable remake of a deplorable film even MORE deplorable! That's truly an accomplishment, Anchor Bay!

The original Spit On Your Grave at least pretended to have a feminist argument of revenge, despite a grotesque and overlong gang rape sequence that fetishizes the act entirely too much to be redeemed through any actions of the victim character. But now, your company has chosen to release a poster that makes that fetishization more explicit, for the delight of audiences of degenerates everywhere!

Now you have a poster that tells the public, "Hey, America! Not only have we released a movie with graphic sexual violence, but we've made sure the victim is nice and sexy, too! That way you'll be sure to get off when that bitch gets what she deserves! Come join the fun!"

To recap:
1. The film's source material is repugnant - could have been a political statement, but chose to be a glorified rape fantasy.
2. Making a remake is deeply irresponsible at best, and certainly morally questionable.
3. Making sure that the poster for a morally questionable and irresponsible glorification of rape onscreen is nice and sexualized, as well as ensuring that you promote how "Unrated" it is (just to make sure audiences know that that character gets raped "real good!") is unconscionable.

Do none of you have daughters, sisters, or wives? Please tell me someone realizes just how horrifying it is to create a sexualized promotional piece for a film about violent rape.

Disgusted, and gleefully passing along links decrying your company all over any social media platform that I can,

[full name redacted - Pajibans call me Tammy]
Demographic: Women aged 25-30 - i.e. the ones that (potentially) buy a lot of your products. Enjoy the backlash, which I can only pray will be coming your way.

Posted by: Tammy at July 13, 2010 4:37 PM

The remake is going to be shit. They will not be allowed to go to the level of brutality and degradation they need to to even come close to getting to the message of the story in 2010. Not happening.

I've written my piece on your anti-ISOYG stance in the past and care not to tread that water again.

Posted by: Robert at July 13, 2010 4:40 PM

Tammy, I am whooping and cheering in my kitchen.

Posted by: Nadine at July 13, 2010 4:52 PM

Slash, to paraphrase that old line, if you had a newsletter I would subscribe to it, because, what you just said about porn/Playboy? YES. I agree! (Not to start a diversion or anything)

Tammy - Now THAT'S what I call eloquent rage!

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 13, 2010 5:18 PM

I get why everyone is so mad about the movie but it sounds like to me the reason for this article is the poster and the poster looks basically the same way the 1978 one did.

Aside from that, keep in mind that they are playing to their audience. Sex sells and they’re in the business of advertising to sell a product.

I noticed someone else mention the poster for "the Unborn" too which makes less sense then complaining about this one. Do you have any doubt that girl got the role for any other reason than she's attractive? I saw the movie, because I knew that hot girl would be in it, and it sucked. She can’t act but she's fun to look at it. One of the best scenes in the movie was the shot of her in her underwear, and that was one of the only bearable parts of that movie. Aside from Gary Oldman who is always awesome.

Again, I get why this movie makes people sick, I just don’t get why so much hatred is being focused on those who were paid to make the poster.


Posted by: chris at July 13, 2010 5:53 PM

I just don’t get why so much hatred is being focused on those who were paid to make the poster.

Because they had the choice to go in another direction, but they chose to rehash the old exploitative poster - except now, With More Sex Appeal! (more heavily Photoshopped to appeal to the modern magazine aesthetic, etc). But really, we're mad at Anchor Bay for accepting the design and for choosing the "Lookie, we've got Unrated Rape Here!" strategy.

Pretty simple.

Posted by: Tammy at July 13, 2010 6:01 PM

I too see this advertising campaign as a fetid dung-load popped out, steaming and still wet, from the sick minds of a few male marketers who capitalize on the audience that jerks off for such shit.

But in all seriousness, this really sickens me.

I talked to a man a few years ago, and he mentioned how he would *never* see the movie "Hostel" because it showed a woman being raped.

I hate gore movies because I find their violence sickening. (Hostel being just one example of those gang-rapey movies that show females being violated in excruciating ways. )


In my friend's mind, there was no excuse for showing a rape scene in a movie in such a way. It's done only for the over-the-top edge (if we can call it that) of showing such a titillating and taboo issue. It has nothing to do with art or expression.

Thanks for putting this up.

Also Dustin, tell us where we can send complaints. I think if everyone on here could copy (clean up a bit perhaps) their comment and send it to the marketers, the distributers, the movie house, and to the head of any cinemas showing this movie, it would be the best thing.

Maybe we could actually force them to admit what they have done if we make enough fuss about it.

Posted by: LBees at July 13, 2010 6:05 PM

@LBees,

I provided a link for Anchor Bay's contact information in a comment above. Scroll up in the thread, you'll see it....

Posted by: Barnes78 at July 13, 2010 6:19 PM

"Aside from that, keep in mind that they are playing to their audience. Sex sells and they’re in the business of advertising to sell a product."

All kinds of wrong. Rape is not merely another form of sex. To equate the two in an advertising campaign (much less a movie) is beyond disgusting.

Posted by: dubiwag at July 13, 2010 8:39 PM

...wow. as a rape victim myself, words fail me- which is kind of a rarity. all i can suffice now is a massive braincramp followed by a facepunch. that's kinda like a facepalm i'd give myself when confronted with such sheer asscavern-deep levels of stupidity, but with a bit more kick, and directed outwardly towards any dumbshit who actually thinks this looks like anything remotely resembling a good idea.

Posted by: betsy at July 13, 2010 8:53 PM

unpopular comment of the day: to everyone who is outraged by this poster, i direct your attention to the scene in the original where the retard is in the grocery store and there's a quick shot of a butcher slicing ... some smaller animal, legs spread, straight down the middle. think about this image. i then suggest anyone further interested in why things are the way they are read The Sexual Politics of Meat. you may not agree with everything in there, but i feel any discussion of the abuses of women is incomplete without also considering our abuses of animals.

Posted by: kristin at July 13, 2010 9:22 PM

Sexualizing rape is like wetting water. Rape is sex. If no sex occurs then it's considered wrestling. Did you mean eroticizing rape? As far as eroticizing rape goes I doubt that it could be worse than Irreversible where the rape is shot like a commercial video with Monica Bellucci looking ravishing and the whole thing looks like a high concept art shoot and she is wearing something more sheer while walking around in public than Victoria's Secret lingerie models wear on the runway but the rape ends looking like something from a UFC match except she's essentially naked and getting kicked in the head which is more realistic than cutting a pair of slacks into bikini bottoms. The movie is very good and not the exploitation flick that ISOYG was. The moral and psychological consequences of revenge are explored and the conclusion is a very interesting one for a European film. You can download the rape scene at rapidshare.

http://rapidshare.com/files/152472209/Monica-Bellucci-Irreversible-Rape-Scene.wmv


Who is the woman in the picture? I assume it's the protagonist wielding the castrating garden shears in the trailer, Sarah Butler. She posed for the poster and made the entire movie for that matter, why no hate for her? And castrating and murdering someone with shears was already done in Hostel 2.

As far as being unrated are they going to actually show real sex like 9 Songs or Short Bus or that mainstream movie Rocco Siffreddi did in France called Romance? I seriously doubt it. The 2000 movie Baise Moi (Rape Me) actually had hardcore sex scenes and a violent rape and a revenge plot so even if they did they'd be 10 years behind curve.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at July 13, 2010 9:49 PM

I just hope and pray that this film NEVER makes it to Trinidad. I hope it flops in the states and the idiots in the distribution industry down here will not get the bright idea to pick it up.

This movie has gone beyond reprehensible and picking up speed. Morality deprived fucks.

I think I feel a headache approaching.

Posted by: Four Eyes at July 13, 2010 9:56 PM

kristin, people might take your point better if you didn't so casually throw around the word "retard." I think you dull your argument about our inhumanity to animals when you can't be bothered to find a less dehumanizing term to describe a human being.

OscarTamerz, I take your point to a degree, but I subscribe to the belief that, despite the use of sex organs as a weapon, rape is a crime of power and violence, not of sex. (This is something of a debate in both legal and feminist circles and has been for some time - can and should rape be called sex, or should it be considered seperately? Personally I think saying "Rape is Sex" taints sex by association - they should have nothing to do with one another).

You are probably right that "eroticizing" would be more technically correct, but there is a compelling argument that while sex parts are involved, rape is not a sex act. We're objecting to the equation of the two - not just making it sexier (the connotation I get from "eroticizing") but making it sexy at all.

Posted by: Tammy at July 13, 2010 10:11 PM

OscarTamerz I can agree that eroticizing may be a slightly more accurate word than sexualizing. I argue that rape is not sex. It is a horrifying hate crime that uses sex acts to humiliate, dominate and abuse another person physically and mentally.
Sex is consensual, shared, and hopefully entirely pleasurable for everyone involved. Equating rape with sex is like equating blunt force trauma assualt with a hammer with any other kind of normal tool use. No, it is brutal assualt. It is also disrespectful to the survivors (and sadly, non-survivors) of the hate crime.

I can't imagine any rape scene being artful, and it creeps me the hell out to know that you do. I'm not sure why you would think the majority in this thread would want to view the link to it. You sure seem to have viewed a lot of rape movies. What difference does it make what Bellucci was wearing? Are you saying it is her character's fault that she was raped because the men just can't help themselves if they see an attractive woman? And why are you pushing for hate for the actress in the movie poster and none of the male actors? I realize the poster is the focus of the thread, but considering your post as a whole, well, you just seem to really enjoy the rape, which is part of hating women.

Dustin your wife is a lucky woman. I hope I can find and fall in love with a nice feminist sympathizer like you someday (some feminists would argue that unless you have a vagina of your own, you can only sympathize because you can't fully experience the daily influx of hate from men on a visceral level for yourself).

Abbynormal and Tammy you inspire me. I want to hug so many of you Pajibans right now.

Posted by: Viking at July 13, 2010 10:34 PM

Slash I want to second what you said, then print it out and wall paper my room with it.

Posted by: Viking at July 13, 2010 10:48 PM

I imagine much of the thought process behind this poster was to appeal to those (un)fortunate enough not to know the content of this abomination, and too stupid to find out.
"Hot chick with knife and ass sticking out? I don't care WHAT this is about, I'm heading down to the megaplex!"
It's cynical and disgusting.
I'm always pleased to read your rage, Dustin. I wish it were more widespread...

Posted by: JQ at July 13, 2010 10:59 PM

I can't imagine any rape scene being artful, and it creeps me the hell out to know that you do.

I said it was shot in that style. She's done a lot of ads for various product lines and none have been shot as sensually as the beginning of the scene. Saving Private Ryan was artful and well done despite being far more violent and bloody. She wasn't dismembered or disemboweled during the scene.

I'm not sure why you would think the majority in this thread would want to view the link to it.

You answered this comment with your first comment. Download the link and watch it until you feel uncomfortable.

You sure seem to have viewed a lot of rape movies.

I watch movies of all genres but my local Blockbusters does have a rape section.

What difference does it make what Bellucci was wearing? Are you saying it is her character's fault that she was raped because the men just can't help themselves if they see an attractive woman?

You've seen through me and that's my point, all women in movies should wear chadors. The sensuality of the beginning of the scene increases the shock at the end when she's being beaten like she's in the ring with Kimbo Slice. You literally fall in love at first sight with her during the first seconds of seeing her on screen and it increases the impact of end of the scene and ultimately the end of the movie.

And why are you pushing for hate for the actress in the movie poster and none of the male actors?

I only saw the actress on the poster but all of the comments were directed at the people who developed the poster and none for the actress who participated in the shamefulness, is that fair? As was pointed out above this is a homage (copy) of the original poster so maybe we should let everybody off the hook.

As far as tainting sex well do a video search for Mr. Hands, that's sex too. Necrophilia is sex as are any perversions you don't like let alone the perversions you do like.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at July 13, 2010 11:57 PM

I understand rape films are not uncommon in Japan, and have been for several decades now. What does that say about them?

Posted by: Pat C at July 14, 2010 12:06 AM

Rape is also about turning human beings into objects. That is, turning a living, breathing individual persson with the right to say "no," into an object that you can use and abuse. This poster turns a living breathing human female into an object of lust. Her face is turned away and all we have is her body. The focal point is her butt. So, this tells me that the poster and the movie is about exploiting rape to objectify women as objects. That's as low as you can get. What's next? The sexual fetishization of slavery? A movie where we see images of oiled-up Africans in chains looking hot? Just gross. The people involved with this movies need an empathy check to see if they are actually human or replicants. I have my bets set on the latter.

Posted by: saphire at July 14, 2010 3:56 AM

OHMYGOD I just wrote this HUGE thing and it just randomly for no reason vanished before I could post it!!
What I said was this;

Oscar, rape isn't sex. Very few rapes are about sexual release, they're about power, dominance, degradation. The few rapes genuinely fuelled by sexual desire usually have a lot of back story in the sense they rapist and victim usually know one another and the rapist has unresolved sexual tensions for the victim, but even then, the rape isn't sex, not for the victim.
Rape, simply, is a violent physical assault, just one that happens to involve the sex organs.
So saying that Rape is sex does not make this poster okay.( I know you didn't say that but...)

The OTHER thing I said was, was that this is the original poster;

http://www.critcononline.com/images/i%20spit%20on%20your%20grave%20poster.jpg

It's just as horrible and exploitative how ever you could, theoretically argue that in the original, the victim is shown walking through the woods with more of her arse covered(just a little though). She's shown with some...purpose. it doesn't make the image okay but arguably it's shows a certain aspect of part of the plot, her actual revenge desires, which like I said, doesn't make it okay but is just a way of looking at it.
Plus her bikini fits her snuggly but smoothly. It happens to cover her butt but the new poster's is actually up her butt, giving her a cleavage which is far more suggestive of nudity which in this context is far more suggestive of sex.

In the NEW poster, it's a model shot. Simple as that, the over the shoulder pose, the coy, half show face, it's the same pose used by models and celebs all the time. It's a favourite for women on the red carpet to show off their pretty dresses more favourably.
You look half over your shoulder to make yourself look slim and hide a wobbly chin.

The there's the knife.
Total fem rant here but;

The knife is already a phallic symbol for a lot of people and in this instance it's no different. It's huge, framed against her buttock and the first six inches are soaked in blood.
It's supposed to represent the dicks of her rapists, after the rape(In my fem reading of this) And framed against her buttock it, to me, from my current fem point of view, it looks like a BRAND, like a mark of ownership, which is in fact what it is.
In the films, the victim uses their lust and warped views of women to get close. They do leave her for dead but then figure she must have liked the gang rape so let her get close to each of them individually. She uses their idea they own her now to literally castrate/drown etc them all.
But that faint idea of empowerment doesn't come through here. The poster makers are trying to go for 'she's totes a bad ass who will get revenge' and missed by all of the miles in the world. What they've landed on is 'sexy rape victim is only capable of mindless blood lust revenge after her forced dicking' which is not empowering, it's pathetic.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love for every rape victim to be given an array of pain causing tools and a day with their attacked, who would be bound but not gagged, so his screams could be heard by all, but this poster doesn't convey a sense of empowerment, it just shows me a victim, marked by her attackers for the rest of her life, and nothing more, using her big phallic knife to get revenge because a rape victim can only move past her assault by flirting with her attackers then using a tool the film makers have actively worked to make represent the rapists dicks, to get their revenge.

I could sit and analyse this for days and never find a positive thing about it. Fuck this movie.

Posted by: Nadine at July 14, 2010 5:50 AM

Really don't understand how people like you can go around and be pissed of at things like this. You do know that there are places in the world that gangrape is a-okey? Someone puts up one poster where you live and you explode, but thousands of miles away women are raped for the stupidest reasons (that they are lesbian etc) and you what do you do?

Posted by: qwert at July 14, 2010 6:03 AM

Qwert you'll find that more than a few Pajibans contribute to and/or are heavily involved in a lot of charity and relief work for, amongst other things, rape. A lot of Pajibans are victims of rape themselves, or know victims of rape.

Name ONE PLACE where gang rape is A-Ok?

I understand your point, but you must understand, it's because there are places in the world where rape happens all the time to female and male victims THAT we're so pissed off. This poster takes one look at victims of rape and slaps them in the face.
We're pissed off because this poster is wildly insensitive to victims of rape and sends the message that rape victims are sexual objects.
It sends the message to people, young people, that it's okay to sexualise rape and rape victims and when that message is sent out, women who are gang raped because they're lesbians or any victim raped for any reason lose voices in their fight for their rights and justice. People see stuff like this and think 'oh this poster makes rape sexy, rape must be sexy' because there actually are people THAT dumb in the world.

We're not ignoring those victims, we're pissed on their behalf because this poster sends the message that the fight against rape in those 'places in the world' is going no where because rape is sexy.
Rape isn't sexy and this poster is sick.

Posted by: Nadine at July 14, 2010 6:19 AM

God I know its Nadine posting just from the first two words, damn sisterly bond.

Its heartening to know that women and men are still able to get outraged over things like this poster. Sex and rape has become a commodity in Hollywood leading viewers to become desensitised and less empathetic to what they are watching. Im glad I can come here and see that there are still humans who dont want to watch torture porn in the cinemas no matter how hard Hollywood tries to shove it down our throats.
That poster and the idea behind it sickens me, I honestly thought we had moved on from video nasties, but unfortunately Hollywood and the film industry will keep recycling crap until everyone jst puts stops watching it.

Posted by: Nieve 'The Threadkiller Queen' at July 14, 2010 6:28 AM

God I know its Nadine posting just from the first two words, damn sisterly bond.

Its heartening to know that women and men are still able to get outraged over things like this poster. Sex and rape has become a commodity in Hollywood leading viewers to become desensitised and less empathetic to what they are watching. Im glad I can come here and see that there are still humans who dont want to watch torture porn in the cinemas no matter how hard Hollywood tries to shove it down our throats.
That poster and the idea behind it sickens me, I honestly thought we had moved on from video nasties, but unfortunately Hollywood and the film industry will keep recycling crap until everyone stops watching it.

Posted by: Nieve 'The Threadkiller Queen' at July 14, 2010 6:29 AM

I know, it's almost like you didn't totally try to murder me at all, the bond is so strong!

But you're right, and video nasties is just the right expression too, there was a reason some of these films were banned back in the day and it wasn't hysteria or prudishness

Posted by: Nadine at July 14, 2010 6:32 AM

"Another thing what makes me feel ill like this is the rape condom. Not because of the jagged teeth and a Doctor having to remove it from tiny little rapist peen, but for the fact that women are living lives where the fear of being raped is such harsh reality that measures like this aren't even considered extreme. No one should have to bear trap their bajingo!"

I wonder if there's been any case of a girl actually wanting to have sex with a guy, but forgetting to take out the rape condom. That would be hella funny if I weren't a guy and found that thought to be pants-shittingly horrifying.

Posted by: Danny from Puerto Rico at July 14, 2010 1:53 PM

Danny, this is a discussion we had, with a combination of terror and amusement.

When we thought about it for a while...we uh...we stopped laughing...the men paled...then wept.

We ignored it. It was only right

Posted by: Nadine at July 14, 2010 3:24 PM

Seriously, you guys are espousing all this feminist shit when 99% of guys agree with you. I saw the first one on TV when I was a kid and thought it was sick. Almost everyone who sees this will think its sick. I agree that it is needless porn for those who truly get off on it. I remember seeing the Hills Have Eyes 2 and when there was the rape scene, there was some guy in the theater laughing. That shit pisses me off too. Heres the lowdown though, for all of you making stupid threats, why dont you go on those websites who list the names and addresses of pedophiles and rapists and make good on your threats if you really want to do somthing about it. Or better yet, how about you carry a fucking gun so you can kill any degenerate scum that would try? The problem with rapists is the fact that weak ass people dont think its bad enough to give the fucker the death penalty or at least 50 fucking years. Its weak bitch ass people like that who destroy America. Everyone can kill germs and plants etc but dont have the moral aptitude to do whats right and put the fuckin goons 10 feet under. Most of your problem stems from dumb ass females who dont get that if it was ever me vs them, the only chance they have is a gun (maybe a knife).

You fem-nazis should be preaching to your compatriots. Not this bullshit self-defense, not fucking pepper spray, give them a gun, better yet, make it perfectly legal for people who arent convicted under violent crimes to carry a concealed weapon.

Rapists should die in my opinion.
Women should protect themselves.
Criminals should stop, but they wont, nor ever will.

Now stop bitching and either find some way to protect yourself or stfu, because the real problem is not this movie, the real problem is
1. The Judicial system.
2. Gun Control
3. Rapists!
4. Dumb bitches who wont protect self from #3

Im not saying it is a victims fault that she was raped, im saying if you do nothing to prevent such an act, its hard for ANYONE to not look within and say "I should have been prepared".

No you shouldnt HAVE to be prepared, but fuck man, we shouldnt HAVE to have a military, I shouldnt HAVE to wear a seat-belt, We shouldnt HAVE to have a border, but therein lies the fucking problem, if you dont have a way to deter those who are wicked than you empower them.

PS. If I seem pissed off, I am a little but I HAVE to protect myself and my family as well, I dont like carrying a loaded gun around everywhere its a friggin pain in the ass LITTERALLY, but I do it because I feel that my saftey is MY RESPONSIBILITY, not joe-schmoe-police officer. I never even bought a gun until I thought "what if someone breaks in my home? or tries to hurt my family" well gotta have at least an equal battle ground.

PS. Ive known 4 rape victims, and even my mother was raped. So stop bitching and do somthing about it.

Posted by: Anon at July 15, 2010 7:15 PM

To be fair, that is a great ass.

Posted by: Angstrom How at July 23, 2010 5:41 PM

So you're against a rape-revenge movie, and to show your anger wish anal rape upon those who might like it? By doing that you're trivializing the very thing you are supposedly against.

Stay classy.

Posted by: James at July 23, 2010 6:07 PM

I don't know what this movie is gonna be like, I'm actually really looking forward to see how they are gonna treat it differently from the original (which, while it's not a great film, I really don't think is encouraging rape. If some douchebags in the audience think it does, that makes them idiots, not the filmmakers).
If you compare the two posters, I find the new one quite clever.

The woman on the poster really has a totally sexualized body, and it is doing all that airbrushed shit that make women selfconscious of their own bodies. But as opposed to the old poster, her butt has the knife right connected to it. Her sexuality and her right to protect it against whoever she does not want to be a part of it are foregrounded, and the fact that she has a sexualized body doesn't mean she's "asking for it" - she is free to reject whoever she wants, and she is free to defend that right violently.
What I don't really like is how aesthetic the poster is...no blood, just a bit of dirt, and the thing is in black and white. Let's hope they don't make the rape artsy, that would certainly be terrible and possibly make the act seem harmless (if such a thing is even possible).

But the way I anticipate it, many of the comments here suggest exactly what the film does. In fact, if you look at the wikipedia site, the poster shows the woman holding shears that are half open, so that they resemble the abstract form of a vagina. The toothed vagina being one of the most used images for women rising up against the patriarchy in feminist discourse, I really feel like the campaign is playing with these images and particularly on our expectation (and hope) that the villains will be punished. That's why yocean who commented "Whoever made that stuff should drown in blood of their dick!!!!" might actually quite like the film, since I'm pretty sure that there will be a castration as a revenge for the rape. And I also assume that, while the rape will be brutal and non-pleasant for the audience, slaying the rapist-villain will be portrayed as reasonable.

Showing a woman being raped doesn't make a movie disgusting. Having the audience enjoy that scene from the perspective of the rapist is.

Yay feminism,

neither

Posted by: neitherofyoutwo at July 23, 2010 7:19 PM

"Seriously, you guys are espousing all this feminist shit when 99% of guys agree with you."

That 1% of guys who don't agree must be spending every waking moment raping and assaulting, considering roughly 1 out of 4 women experience sexual assault.

And then you go on to describe women who are raped as "dumb bitches" who simply didn't protect themselves well enough.
Because, you know, everyone has easy access to guns.

Your stupidity, sir? It is fucking epic.

And for the record: "I've known four rape victims, so I can say these things!" is hilariously analogous to "But my best friend is black!!"

Posted by: serenity_now at July 24, 2010 12:48 AM

Or better yet, how about all males are forced to wear Saw-like mini guillotine contraptions on their junk poised at the read to chop the minute any forced sexual activity goes on?

Trust me, the rate of rape will go down like THAT *click*

*End feminist rant, stamps out burning bra*

Posted by: Camilla at July 13, 2010 10:11 AM

I re-visited this discussion in light of Dr. Pisaster's recent post. There is a problem with this guillotine premise, as much as I would like for it to work. Simply put, people don't need intact penii to rape.

In the state of Illinois, there are special facilities for folks who have served their criminal sentences for a violent sexual offense but have not finished rehabilitation sufficient for them to rejoin society at large. There isn't a way for the public to know who these offenders are because they are in a "health" facility, so listing these people's locations on a sex offender registry would constitute violation of HIPAA. Relax, though. Since the facility opened in the early 2000s, no one has ever passed the "test" necessary for re-entering society. I won't go into what the test entails because it would probably gross people out, but as long as it keeps bad people away from me, I don't care.

My father's friend works at one of these facilities as a correctional officer. I asked him one day about his work and whether chemical castration worked. He said he wished it were that simple, but castration doesn't work. If a person doesn't rape with their sexual equipment, they will simply resort to sticks, pipes, baseball bats, hands, etc. to violate the people they want to. If there were a way to remove the desire to violate, that would be much more effective.

Posted by: LibraryChick at August 4, 2010 11:51 AM

Somebody probably said this already, but I find it funny that all these people getting bent out of shape over this seem to be wishing violence against the people who made the film. that's fucking stupid, and contradictory. I for one don't think that a simple poster for a movie makes anybody evil. It's a marketing ploy, and they have every right to push their movie in a way that will sell it to more people. Regardless of what anybody here is saying I bet most of us here will still go out and see it. And when/if you do go see it, and God forbid even like the film, it doesn't mean you support or endorse rape.

Posted by: Trav at August 7, 2010 9:14 AM

To be honest, i fapped to this.
Really. i'd like to say to you that i hate this image.
Of course, that would be a lie, because frankly i just
LOVE the idea of a brutal redneck gang rape.
Like, really. i got hard just by writing it.
.
.
.
.
.
seriously though, i think you're reading
way too much into this. in fact, i think your
reaction says more about you than it does about
the marketing people. like how it's always the
closeted gay people who are the worst
homophobes? or like paedophile priests,
accusing everyone else of being evil sinners?
basically what i'm saying is that you're a dirty rapist.
.
.
.
.
.
it's a art.
.
.
.
.
.
post-script: not that there's anything wrong with gays.
just an apt analogy (those who doth protest too much).

Posted by: kapow at August 7, 2010 1:31 PM

Dude, seems like you got a lot hate bottled up. see a psychiatrist or something before you go all Virginia Tech on your workplace one day.

Posted by: Jon at August 7, 2010 1:38 PM

Wow, so much negative feedback about this poster?? almost exactly the same as the original! only thing that shits me is how all these movies are getting re-made and not many do the originals justice ( bar a hand full). Condolences to those who were raped, abused etc, sad but this shit and much worse goes on every day. Do as Abbey has done...harden the fuck up peoples, she gets her revenge in the end

Posted by: Snegs at August 16, 2010 9:32 AM

This poster is the farthest thing from "titillation": it's meant to be shocking. It plays upon a common cultural representation of sexuality, but brutalizes it to a point of repulsion. It screams "VICTIM" and "DANGER." When I look upon this image, I am not turned-on, but afraid.

So, if such visceral outrage stems from a belief that this is meant to be titillating, then perhaps a small part of you IS titillated--and for that, you feel much shame.

Posted by: AAAutin at August 17, 2010 2:41 PM

I think if you had no idea that This film features rape as the turning point for the whole movie then I would simply see this as your typical exploitive horror movie poster.

Knowing about the original and having seen the trailer, this poster makes me cringe in all the wrong ways.

Posted by: MikeyGorman at August 21, 2010 5:59 PM

I’d be inclined to give the go-ahead with you on this. Which is not something I usually do! I love reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to speak my mind!

Posted by: Clifton Roger at November 8, 2010 2:22 PM

Hey! I would like to inform you that if I look at this page on my android the page looks very strange. It’s very narrow. I know this is a simple fix. Other than that great blog! I’ve bookmarked it.

Posted by: Trista Stuck at November 23, 2010 12:18 PM

I salute you, I really adore the way you put the thing... maybe u could look at my site and make a few corrections. thank you in advance :)

Posted by: Eve Figueira at December 27, 2010 6:27 AM

Your blog is brilliant I will have to read it all, thank you Thank you.

Posted by: hunter original 23855 - 52" fan black at January 24, 2011 4:47 PM

Hi I live in India. Even Wikipedia did not even come close to your article.

Posted by: Matthew C. Kriner at February 14, 2011 6:24 AM

















mindholeblowers.gif viral_hits.gif
>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time