free counter with statistics The Pajiba Anthology of American Literature | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

mar27neal2.jpg

The Pajiba Anthology of American Literature

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | May 29, 2007 | Comments (35)


If Neal Pollack has anything to say about it, this whole hipster parent trend is gonna be huge — like, Neal Pollack huge; the kind of huge one might expect from a guy who used to bone Zadie Smith and Lara Flynn Boyle, who hangs out with Karl Malone and Biship Desmond TuTu, who was once blacklisted by Hollywood, who yachted with JFK, whose personality was partially shaped by what he saw in war-torn Albania, whose massive Internet Celebrity is a burden to him, and who is actually friends with real-life working class black women. Pollack, who was the first author to have a book published by McSweeney’s (The Neal Pollack Anthology of American Literature, a satire of journalistic self-importance and later, Never Mind the Pollacks, a brilliant parody of popular-culture excesses), finally found semi-mainstream success earlier this year with his memoir, Alternadad, a series of tales about raising his son as a “hipster Dad,” (though one might reasonably argue that hipster parenting is, itself, semi-mainstream now). Pollack, a freelance writer and popular author (in certain McSweeneys’ circles, anyway), writes about having to contend with being both a “cool” person and a “cool” parent, while dealing with diapers and spit up. Partially, this involves eschewing Barney in favor of The Ramones, but mostly it’s about maintaining a shred of one’s pre-child identity. And even if Pollack’s style of parenting is not entirely new, you do have to give the man a lot of credit for being the first to basically turn what would’ve been a great series of blog entries into a book about parenting (beating Dooce to the punch). And now, of course, he does blog about it over on Offsprung.

At any rate, Alternadad has been optioned for a film and now has a screenwriter, Dana Gould — an actor/writer probably best known for his role on “The Ben Stiller Show” and for writing a few episodes of “The Simpsons.” Unfortunately, I suspect that Gould will ultimately ruin the alterna-charm of Alternadad by trying to create a long-form narrative out of a series of anecdotes (the same reason, I suspect, that Sedaris’ work hasn’t made the transition to the big screen yet) — I’m guessing the book would’ve served better as a springboard to a memoirish television sitcom, but since the sitcom is (mostly) dead, we’re given a 90-minute feature instead. I’m also guessing you can expect Garden State crossed with The Pacifier. If we’re lucky, Seth Rogen gets the lead; if not, expect Dan Fogler or Jack Black (though, Clerk’s Dante is a dead-ringer for Pollack).

Elsewhere, Sandra Bullock — whose last two flicks absolutely sucked — is trying to break that streak by starring in Proposal, a romantic comedy written by Peter Chiarelli, who runs a production company for Dreamworks. The premise involves a demanding boss facing deportation to Canada who agrees to a sham marriage with her young male assistant. It’s not the most brilliant premise, of course, and Bullock doesn’t offer much reason to believe it’ll be a particularly great romcom, but I know Chiarelli, and he’s a pretty goddamn funny guy, so there’s probably a lot more to Proposal than the premise suggests. At least I hope so, otherwise it’ll make for an awfully awkward review.

For those of you who returned from a nice Memorial Day vacation only to be inundated with a gossip blogosphere newly obsessed with she-who-we-cannot-name, her misdemeanor DUI, and her “usable amount of cocaine” (in my understanding, any amount is a “usable” amount, right?), and her return to rehab, I’m sorry to further plague you, but assuming she doesn’t drink herself to death (fingers crossed!) before then, she-who-we-cannot-name is now attached to Poor Things, a comedy about two grandma gangsters (played by Shirley MacClaine and Olympia Dukakis) who set up homeless men with insurance policies and then hire hit men to kill them so that they can collect. The story itself is actually inspired by the real events, though I’m not sure how to wise it is to make a comedy about two blue-hairs who are currently facing the death penalty (ha!). I can only hope that whatsherface will play one of the homeless people who is unceremoniously bumped off in a Final Destination inspired goring. The script comes from Trent Haaga, who also wrote Citizen Toxie: The Toxic Avenger IV and produced Easter Bunny, Kill! Kill!, which might inspire the optimistically naïve belief that she-who-we-cannot-name has already been relegated to the straight-to-DVD features if not for the fact that Rosario Dawson and Tatum Channing have also been attached to a pretty decent cast (and Haaga’s latest, The Dead Girl was somewhat well received, though not by us). Interestingly, Ash (a.k.a. Ashley Cohen Baron), who is a cousin to Sacha, is set to direct, setting up the inner turmoil I now have about whether I want Poor Things to bomb or succeed at the box office.

Finally, Robert Rodriguez has now added another film to the slate of movies he plans to direct in the near future (including Land of the Lost or The Jetsons): Barbarella. Personally, I think it’s just about the dumbest career move that Rodriguez has made since The Faculty. You just don’t remake films that managed to gain a certain cult following because of its camp value (see, e.g., Wicker Man). Actually, I’d suggest that recapturing unintentional hilarity is damn near impossible, but for the fact that Rodriguez himself did it in Planet Terror. Still, I think the task here is considerably tougher, especially now that the majority of Rodriguez’s demographic is either unfamiliar with Barbarella or, like me, only managed to sit through the opening credit sequence before turning it off while wondering resplendently, What the fuck, man? Thankfully, however, Rodriguez has also agreed to release Machete, an expansion of the kickass fake trailer he made for the Grindhouse intermission (“They fucked with the wrong Mexican.”) However, the mexploitation flick will only be a 40-minute straight-to-DVD movie that will be released simultaneously with the Grindhouse DVD and, in all likelihood, will mostly feature unused footage from the original trailer.

There’s only one new noteworthy new film to hit DVD shelves this week, Hannibal Rising, which only further compounds my summer blockbuster misery — it’s really unbelievable, you know? For those who rely on the multiplex to get their cinematic fix, the summer kind of blows if you don’t want to see or have already seen Shrek the Third, Pirates of the Caribbean, or Spiderman 3. Those three films must be taking up 80 percent of the screens right now, so for a lot of folks, those are the only three options, which explains why they make so much goddamn money. There’s nothing else from which to choose. Of course, it doesn’t help that the art houses are still showing flicks from March. I dunno. It’s nice and all when those huge 24 screeners with stadium seating and $47 popcorn/soda combos move into town, but what’s the freakin’ point if you’re going to fill all 24 screens with the same three flicks?

Anyway, instead of leaving you with a trailer today, I leave you with this Knocked Up parody of the David O. Russell/Lily Tomlin freak-out disasterbacle. The premise: Michael Cera (“Arrested Development”) once held the role in Knocked Up that Seth Rogen now holds. Here’s the goods:

Michael Cera gets fired from Knocked Up


Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End | Supernatural Season Two



Comments

That grandma movie would sound promising, if they weren't trying to sell it as a comedy.
Although I do love to laugh about old ladies killing people and then getting put on death row for it.
HAH!

Posted by: Leanne at May 29, 2007 10:43 AM

Unfortunately, Blohan has turned out to be as evilly cunning in her film selection as she is bone-dumb retarded in the conduct of her personal life. As with "Georgia Rule," "Prairie Home Companion," and other projects, her agents have a way of attaching her to ensemble casts that help conceal or at least balance her utter inability to act or even project charisma.

If the project crashes and burns ("Bobby"), it's the director's fault or someone else's fault. If the project is a success ("Prairie Home Companion," critically; "Georgia Rule," economically), the success perpetuates Blohan's ability to remain in the public consciousness as someone associated with decent films.

Like a learning evil robot, she's learning that when she goes out on her own to carry a project ("Lucky You"), that . . . um, how can I put this? Oh: She can't carry a fucking project -- any better than an anvil can float.

Damn your evil genius, Blohan's agent!

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 29, 2007 10:44 AM

Oh god. Another reason I want Michael Cera to have my nervous, stammery children.


"Your show's not even on the air anymore!" Bwah.

Posted by: Mara at May 29, 2007 10:47 AM

Thank you for acknowledging that the Cera clip is a joke! Other sites are presenting it as an actual scoop of leaked footage and not a publicity stunt disguised as a parody.

Posted by: Ciji at May 29, 2007 10:53 AM

Summer movies to look forward to--"Day Watch" (second film in the Russian "Night Watch" trilogy FINALLY hitting North American shores; see the ads on this very site), and "Sunshine" (again, the Europeans have already been indulged... meanwhile I wait like an idiot over here). And last but not least--"Rescue Dawn".

In fact, this summer is looking goddamned fantastic from where I sit.

I sincerely hope Pajiba plans to review at least one of these. If all three get coverage, there's a homecooked meal with all your names on it.

Posted by: Ranylt at May 29, 2007 11:03 AM

Oh and--Rodriguez doing Barbarella? Normally I break out in hives and develop spontaneous botulism poisoning when I hear about classics (cult or otherwise) being revisited, but I'm actually a little primed for this one.

Posted by: Ranylt at May 29, 2007 11:06 AM

Show me a hipster parent and I see an enabler for generation douchebag.

Your kid ain't your friend and parents aren't supposed to be cool.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 29, 2007 11:10 AM

PS: that Blowhan movie WILL BOMB, any reputable actor SHOULD refuse to work with her, also, any exec who greenlights this shit should be escorted off the lot and beaten on the spot.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 29, 2007 11:14 AM

When I first saw the title, I thought this was going to be the Pajiba summer reading guide. When is that coming out?

Posted by: Nate at May 29, 2007 11:18 AM

Barbadoslim, you are so right. I'm getting really sick of being one of the few parents around here that actually dictates rules and expectations of behavior to their child and insists on her meeting them. The kids in my daughter's school are terrifyingly obnoxious, and the parents seem totally oblivious. "Oh, you're screaming? Of course I'll buy you that!"

Posted by: pinkcheese at May 29, 2007 11:37 AM

Eventually 'Paprika' will move beyond New York and L.A. to tiny little podunk burgs like... Boston. Austin. Pittsburgh. Maybe. Please, dammit.

Posted by: twig at May 29, 2007 11:41 AM

I loved Barbarella when I was younger. I have the awesome movie poster and everything. I am not okay with a remake, especially since Rose McGowan is not Jane Fonda, and they will probably try to update or remove the ending song. "An angel, an ANGEL, is lo-ove!"

Posted by: Phaeolus at May 29, 2007 12:20 PM

I'm embarrassed to say this, Dustin, but The Faculty really scared me, and not just because of the bad acting. Maybe b/c I was in high school at the time and knew a lot of those weird ass kids.

I love anything with Shirley MacLaine, but anything with Blohan makes me shudder. No can do, Shirley. It was bad enough I sat through Rumor Has It.

Posted by: Brie at May 29, 2007 12:29 PM

I'm with Nate -- the title of this post made me salivate for the reading guide. Oh well. Something to look forward to.

Posted by: Louise at May 29, 2007 12:40 PM

The question of a "usable amount of cocaine" has actually been debated in New York criminal courts. In my home state, the police regularly arrest people with empty crack vials or syringes and charge them with criminal possession of a controlled substance, a misdeamnor punishable by up to a year in jail (as opposed to possession of drug paraphernalia, which is harder to prove and carries a lesser penalty). Although the vials/syringes are empty, and cannot therefore be "used," they do contain miscroscopic traces of cocaine or heroin which show up in lab tests.

One sensible lower court judge ruled that since that kind of residue can't be used to get high, it's not really a controlled substance. Anxious to keep the failed war on drugs going, New York's highest court reversed, holding that any amount of controlled substance, miscroscopic or otherwise, can be the basis for a possession prosecution. A great moment in jurisprudence.

Sorry for that totally non-movie related tangent. I have to justify those law school loans somehow.

Posted by: bartap at May 29, 2007 1:42 PM

Ranylt, thanks for reminding me about Day Watch. I'm looking forward to that one as well. As much as I love Christian Bale (I like Steve Zahn, too), I have a mild loathing of any film related to war. Therefore, it is unlikely that I will see Rescue Dawn in the theater or on DVD. What is Sunshine about?

Anyway, I'm not looking forward to rest of the summer movie-wise. I caught Spiderman 3 this weekend, and as I stated in my late, no one cares post on the review, it was mediocre to borderline bad. Frankly, I don't understand why it wasn't lambasted the way the Matrix sequels were, as I felt that the theme of "fantastic special effects with a WTF? plot" was quite similar. Please God, let that be the last one.

Confession time! I liked Lohan in her earlier years - I even enjoyed Mean Girls. Despite her personal problems, I've cut her a lot of slack as I thought that she was a decent actress. However, as socalledonlycousins' comment so astutely highlights.....not so much. Apologies for the delay in seeing the light, I'm only human.

Posted by: Daphne at May 29, 2007 1:58 PM

Neal Pollack recently had a cool series of articles on Slate - set up like an e-mail exchange - with Paul Shirley, a pro basketball player who had a pretty cool blog while with the Suns and now for ESPN[dot]com. Very interesting read, as are his other sports writings for Slate

Posted by: Brian at May 29, 2007 2:30 PM

'Look out Grandma! Grandma's gaining on us!'

Wasn't this movie released ten years ago under the title of TOO MANY GRANDMAS, starring Bo Derek and Olympia Dukakis?

Yes.

Posted by: M at May 29, 2007 2:34 PM

What is Sunshine about?
Daphne - it is Danny Boyle's SciFi movie about "A team of astronauts are sent to re-ignite the dying sun 50 years into the future"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448134/

Posted by: Brian at May 29, 2007 2:52 PM

BarbadoSlim, you read my mind. I'm 40 and, to this day, while I appreciate the friendship that's grown between my mom and me, I want her to be my mom first. Being a good parent trumps "cool," every day of the week. Worrying over losing one's coolness once they become a parent is total self-indulgent bullshit.

I've never read Neal Pollack, but I've heard him talk. I wasn't impressed. Insisting "I'm a dad, but I'm COOL" by dressing one's kid in punk tees and Doc Martens isn't cool. In fact, when one feels compelled to proclaim their coolness to the world by using their child to demonstrate that coolness is decidedly uncool. Blech. Next, please.

Posted by: Shannon at May 29, 2007 3:32 PM

Ohhhhh....that Sunshine. Thanks, Brian. There was a trailer on Pajiba not too long ago, I think. It's all coming back to me now. Meh, I don't really want to see that, either. Maybe a DVD rental, as the trailer didn't tickle my fancy enough to check it out in the theater. Of course, my mind is subject to change.

Posted by: Daphne at May 29, 2007 3:33 PM

Show me a hipster parent and I see an enabler for generation douchebag.

Your kid ain't your friend and parents aren't supposed to be cool.

Based on the overly general tones you're speaking in, I'd wager a guess that you haven't read Neal's book. I think you might actually like it, though I realize I'm basing a lot about you on two sentences.

"Hipster," and by extension "hipster parent," gets thrown around an awful lot by people who want to paint an entire generation with a broad brush, and the vagueness and disconnectedness from reality turns it into a slur. It's "Gen X" all over again on more than one level.

Posted by: matt at May 29, 2007 3:42 PM

Hahahaha!! wooowww rowles, +1 in my book for you. any post AD clips of any of the cast makes me very happy. hurray!

Posted by: MAx at May 29, 2007 4:02 PM

Oh, wow. It's a testament to how fried my brain is today (it's the first day back after a three-day weekend! Shouldn't I be, like, slowly easing back into work? Why am I already/still tearing my hair out and staying late?! Um, anyway...) that I glanced at the title, assumed it was the long-awaited Pajibans' Favorite Books post, and didn't realize it was the trade roundup until midway through the Proposal paragraph.

Does anyone have a blade? No?

Anyway, I have the good fortune to live in NY and have access to more independent films; for those who can, y'all should go see Once as soon as you can. Absolutely beautiful and deserving of every rave review it's gotten.

Posted by: alanna at May 29, 2007 5:33 PM

"Show me a hipster parent and I see an enabler for generation douchebag"

Ouch. I think the term "hipster" is catching a lot of flack when in relationship to parenting the term, I feel, takes on a different meaning. I like to think of myself as a hipster parent under the definition of the term being that I'm raising my kids to shun the mass market drivel that Disney and other corporations shove at them from every direction as "entertainment", and embrace a more erudite view of themselves and their place in the world. And no, I'm not raising a couple of kids that are going to think they're too cool for their own good....although if they do, I'll get a good chuckle out of it.

Posted by: Manny at May 29, 2007 6:53 PM

Daphne, I liked "Mean Girls," too ... another example of an overall fine cast where Blohan was able to hide in the tall grass: Rachel McAdams, Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Lacey Chabert .... It's not an Oscar-fest, but it's a solid comedic cast for that type of movie. Blohan was okay, and she was buoyed by a good ensemble. Most of the good stuff from the film came from the Rachel-Lacey-someone else "three witches" group and from Fey's exasperated teacher.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 29, 2007 9:30 PM

"I liked "Mean Girls," too ... another example of an overall fine cast where Blohan was able to hide in the tall grass: Rachel McAdams, Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Lacey Chabert ...."

Yes YES YES, finally, I don't know where people got the idea the Lohan "made" that film, I watched it again and, sorry, she just played the SAME schtick she played on Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen. YOU KNOW THIS TO BE TRUE!!!!!


PS: I, in no way mean to offend any cool moms or dads out there. I'm pretty sure most of you know what I mean. Don't get your panties in bunch if you just bought a vintage pair of Pumas.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 29, 2007 9:38 PM

B-Slim: When I think of that film, I don't even think Blohan. The bitchy-bitch triumvirate made that film -- Rachel McAdams and Lacey Chabert in FINE form -- along with Tina Fey's open-mouthed-horror reactions and snarky comments. Blohan was a combination of two utterly unchallenging roles: the straight man and Nubile Female Number 1.

And I can finally say it: Lacey is and was WAY fucking hotter than the Blow (love the sex&drugs double-entendres that relate closely to the person's name).

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 29, 2007 9:58 PM

"Your show's not even on the air anymore!"

And neither are any of Apatow's...::sniff::

Posted by: Geetch at May 29, 2007 11:15 PM

Re Neal Pollack, hoping to be a parent myself one day, I find the concept of retaining one's own personal identity and not just becoming so and so's dad an interesting, even essential concept for a happy and healthy life as a person and a parent. I haven't read any Pollack and I don't like to judge on first impressions but I loathe the word 'hipster' with a passion and am wary of a middle aged guy willingly calling himself 'hipster', a term we usually associate 'round these parts with emptysouled tryhard posers who look like they just stepped out of an Avril Lavigne video. Not saying Pollack is, just saying it's an offputing tag to put on yourself.

I'm hope to be a good parent and I hope to raise kids who look beyond the mainstream and see the world for what it is but as for being cool and hip when you've got kids, that's just lame, my priority will be those kids, not whether or not other people still think I'm cool

Posted by: Jamieson at May 29, 2007 11:43 PM

Not saying Pollack is, just saying it's an offputing tag to put on yourself.

I definitely agree. But it's important to realize that it's a tag that was put on him by others, not himself. His embrace of it is an ironic one.

PS: I, in no way mean to offend any cool moms or dads out there. I'm pretty sure most of you know what I mean. Don't get your panties in bunch if you just bought a vintage pair of Pumas.

I'm wearing sandals from Target. My panties are only in a bunch because you're insisting on ignoring some pretty reasoned and thoughtful responses from Manny and me about who these people are who've been saddled with the hipster or cool-parent tag. I think you, I, Manny and anyone with half a brain is well aware that a parent who overtly thinks he or she is a "cool-dad" or "cool-mom" is little more than an oblivious dork, while a real no-foolin' good parent is a cool parent whether or not they want it or realize it.

All the disagreements on this thread about "cool parents" are manufactured. Whether you know it or not, we're all on the same page.

Posted by: matt at May 30, 2007 10:53 AM

Show me a hipster parent and I see an enabler for generation douchebag.

Your kid ain't your friend and parents aren't supposed to be cool.

Agreed! Stay cool to make yourself feel better as a person, but not in anyway to influence your parenting.

Posted by: katy at May 30, 2007 2:27 PM

Hmmm...I'm very torn here. I'm due in two weeks (yes, my friends, dos semanas) and have, naturally, been giving a fair amount of thought to what kind of parent I'll be. Okay, that's a huge lie: I'm scarcely prepared for the trip to the hospital. HOWEVER, I will undoubtedly be giving some thought to parenting in the frighteningly near future.

I've gotta say that I welcome Pollack et al.'s perspectives on parenting in that they espouse not giving up your identity entirely when you have a child. I've had way too many friends turn into paranoid frigging zombies after having children ("Is that PEANUT BUTTER in your cabinet?!"). There are, however, some aspects of his ilk that are, to my mind, objectively irritating. This is probably because I live in Brooklyn (though in a truly yuppefied n'hood with nothing alterna- about it), but I've had my fill of little Montessori-bound white boys named Elijah with shaggy hair and Che t-shirts. There's only so much of that any of us can take. With that said, I don't see how "alterna-parents" project their fantasies of childhood on their children any more than Lily's parents up in Greenwich do with her towheaded bob and riding lessons.

Self-identifying as "Alternadad" does, however, open Pollack up to all of the criticism he receives. It forces me to wish upon him a lacrosse-playing son who majors in Econ and listens to Hootie and the Blowfish.

Two weeks?! That's great, Samantha. I hope you've already taken off from the firm and are lounging around on the couch in anticipation. Good luck and best wishes in with the impending motherhood. -- DR

Posted by: Samantha T at May 31, 2007 10:54 AM

Thanks, DR. Sadly, still at the firm (hence the nonstop Pajiba check-ins). One must suck the corporate teat for as long as possible.

Am hoping my spawn won't feel the same way.

Posted by: Samantha T at May 31, 2007 11:24 AM

I don't know about the whole "hipster parent" thing as I haven't read Pollack's book, so I can't make any educated comments about it. However, I think it is important for a parent to retain not only their identity as a person but not let the child overtake their relationships with other people. I've seen it happen to many times and it is maddening. Some parents become completely secondary beings to their children. Their children end up dictating the rules of the house and how their parents interact with the outside world - all in the name of raising the child so that they are "happy." One day my husband and I are going to have children and we've vowed not to let our children form us into helpless beings who can't teach little Johnny or Suzy the meaning of the word "no" or that they will eventually have to grow up and live their own lives because their parents won't always be around to fulfill their every wish.

Posted by: stardust savant at June 2, 2007 12:10 PM